Comparing Problem Formulations for Endometriosis Lesion Detection on T2-weighted Pelvic MRI

Eliot Leguy; Krystel Nyangoh Timoh; Pierre Jannin; Baxter, John, S H; Elodie Germani

Comparing Problem Formulations for Endometriosis Lesion Detection on T2-weighted Pelvic MRI

Eliot Leguy, Krystel Nyangoh Timoh, Pierre Jannin, Baxter, John, S H, Elodie Germani

In: 2026 · 2026 · W7204860286

preprint OA: green CC0

🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex

⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-04 ⓘ

This paper compares different problem formulations for detecting endometriosis lesions using T2-weighted pelvic MRI to determine the most effective computational approach for this specific medical imaging task.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-04 · read from full text ⓘ

The provided text does not contain a research paper but rather a security challenge page generated by the Anubis bot protection system. It explains that the website requires users to solve a Proof-of-Work puzzle to verify they are not automated scrapers, noting that this is a temporary measure while more advanced fingerprinting techniques are developed. The text explicitly instructs users to disable browser plugins like JShelter that might interfere with the required JavaScript features. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

International audience

Full text 1,068 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand

Making sure you're not a bot! Loading... You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone. Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive. Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate. Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex: last seen: 2026-09-20T06:06:26.060083+00:00

License: CC0 · commercial use OK