Minimal-deviation endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. A report of five cases of a distinctive neoplasm that may be misinterpreted as benign

other OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-12 ⓘ

This paper reports five cases of minimal-deviation endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the cervix, which possess deceptively benign histological features that can lead to misinterpretation.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-29 · read from full text ⓘ

This report describes five cases of minimal-deviation endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix, a distinctive neoplasm characterized by deceptively benign histological features. The patients ranged in age from 34 to 42 years, with tumors identified as incidental findings or through abnormal Pap smear results. Microscopic examination revealed proliferations of glands and cysts that lacked significant stromal reaction but exhibited specific indicators of malignancy, such as deep wall presence and cytologic atypicity. Although none of the tumors recurred or metastasized during the follow-up period, the authors emphasize that these lesions can be easily misinterpreted as benign conditions. This paper is centrally about a specific type of cervical cancer; it does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis, but was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

We describe five cervical adenocarcinomas with unusual, deceptively benign histological features that occurred in women 34 to 42 years of age and caused problems in interpretation. The tumors were incidental findings in hysterectomy or cone-biopsy specimens in four patients; the fifth patient was investigated because abnormal glandular cells were found on a Papanicolaou smear. One patient had been exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. The cervix is known to have been abnormal on gross evaluation in only one case. Microscopic examination disclosed a deceptively benign-appearing proliferation of glands and cysts for the most part unassociated with a stromal reaction. Cilia were present in four neoplasms and apical snouts in three. Features that indicated the neoplastic nature of the glandular proliferation in these cases, to varying extents in individual cases, included the number of glands and their distribution, the shapes of the glands, their presence deep in the cervical wall, the focal presence of a stromal reaction, and moderate cytologic atypicality with occasional mitotic figures. None of the tumors is known to have recurred or metastasized. In our opinion, these distinctive neoplasms represent minimal-deviation endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the cervix.
Full text 1,474 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Minimal-Deviation Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix A Report of Five Cases of a Distinctive Neoplasm That May Be Misinterpreted as Benign - Robert H. Young - Robert E. Scully We describe five cervical adenocarcinomas with unusual, deceptively benign histological features that occurred in women 34 to 42 years of age and caused problems in interpretation. The tumors were incidental findings in hysterectomy or cone-biopsy specimens in four patients; the fifth patient was investigated because abnormal glandular cells were found on a Papanicolaou smear. One patient had been exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. The cervix is known to have been abnormal on gross evaluation in only one case. Microscopic examination disclosed a deceptively benign-appearing proliferation of glands and cysts for the most part unassociated with a stromal reaction. Cilia were present in four neoplasms and apical snouts in three. Features that indicated the neoplastic nature of the glandular proliferation in these cases, to varying extents in individual cases, included the number of glands and their distribution, the shapes of the glands, their presence deep in the cervical wall, the focal presence of a stromal reaction, and moderate cytologic atypicality with occasional mitotic figures. None of the tumors is known to have recurred or metastasized. In our opinion, these distinctive neoplasms represent minimal-deviation endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the cervix.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenocarcinoma Endometriosis Uterine Cervical Neoplasms Adenocarcinoma Adult Biopsy Cervix Uteri Cervix Uteri Diagnosis, Differential Endometriosis Female Humans Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-04T09:26:46.659050+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:39.448046+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-06T06:46:56.404536+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine