“No Time for Myself”: Personality Moderates Associations Between Positive Solitude and Parental Well-being

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

This study examined whether daily positive solitude (time to oneself) is associated with lower negative affect and healthier cortisol patterns in 318 parents of underage children, and whether personality traits moderate these associations. Using daily diaries over up to 8 consecutive days (mood, positive solitude, stress exposure) and saliva cortisol sampling 4 times/day over up to 4 days, multilevel modeling tested within-person links while controlling for daily stress. On days with positive solitude, parents reported lower negative affect and showed steeper cortisol wake-evening slopes, indicating better stress recovery, with stronger negative-affect reductions for individuals high in neuroticism and openness and a stronger solitude–cortisol association for those high in neuroticism. The authors present this as evidence for restorative effects of positive solitude in parenting demands, but it is limited by its diary/cortisol sampling design across a relatively short observation window and its focus on parental well-being outcomes. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to examine whether daily experiences of positive solitude—defined as time to oneself—relate to lower negative affect and healthier cortisol patterns in parents of underage children, and whether personality traits moderate these associations. A sample of 318 parents (Mage = 40.06 years; 45% male) with underage children completed up to 8 consecutive days of daily diaries (mood, positive solitude, stress exposure) and up to 4 days of saliva sampling (4 times/day) for cortisol analysis. Multilevel modeling examined within-person links between positive solitude, negative affect, and cortisol wake-evening slopes, controlling for daily stress. Results showed that on days when they had time to themselves, parents experienced lower negative affect and steeper cortisol slopes, indicating better stress recovery. The reduction in negative affect with positive solitude was stronger for parents high in neuroticism and openness, and high neuroticism was also linked with a stronger association between solitude and cortisol slopes. Findings underscore the potential restorative value of daily positive solitude for parents, particularly those high in neuroticism and openness. In the context of the high demands of parenting, positive solitude may serve as a valuable resource for emotional renewal, self-care, self-connection, and recovery from daily parenting stress.
Full text 10,717 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
“No Time for Myself”: Personality Moderates Associations Between Positive Solitude and Parental Well-being | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article “No Time for Myself”: Personality Moderates Associations Between Positive Solitude and Parental Well-being Theresa Pauly This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7200119/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 12 Jan, 2026 Read the published version in Communications Psychology → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This study aimed to examine whether daily experiences of positive solitude—defined as time to oneself—relate to lower negative affect and healthier cortisol patterns in parents of underage children, and whether personality traits moderate these associations. A sample of 318 parents (Mage = 40.06 years; 45% male) with underage children completed up to 8 consecutive days of daily diaries (mood, positive solitude, stress exposure) and up to 4 days of saliva sampling (4 times/day) for cortisol analysis. Multilevel modeling examined within-person links between positive solitude, negative affect, and cortisol wake-evening slopes, controlling for daily stress. Results showed that on days when they had time to themselves, parents experienced lower negative affect and steeper cortisol slopes, indicating better stress recovery. The reduction in negative affect with positive solitude was stronger for parents high in neuroticism and openness, and high neuroticism was also linked with a stronger association between solitude and cortisol slopes. Findings underscore the potential restorative value of daily positive solitude for parents, particularly those high in neuroticism and openness. In the context of the high demands of parenting, positive solitude may serve as a valuable resource for emotional renewal, self-care, self-connection, and recovery from daily parenting stress. Social science/Psychology/Human behaviour Health sciences/Biomarkers Full Text Additional Declarations There is NO Competing Interest. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 12 Jan, 2026 Read the published version in Communications Psychology → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7200119","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":492465590,"identity":"4a0a587f-ba3a-45c2-9006-056afeec5780","order_by":0,"name":"Theresa Pauly","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6855-1787","institution":"Simon Fraser University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Theresa","middleName":"","lastName":"Pauly","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-07-24 00:10:17","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7200119/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7200119/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00396-w","type":"published","date":"2026-01-12T05:00:00+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":102654808,"identity":"3d8099db-5c59-4f8d-ab87-8bbf53c20417","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-14 08:10:32","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":689620,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7200119/v1_covered_d52faaf5-8fe7-40ec-96a7-8ba6a34de7d4.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"There is \u003cb\u003eNO\u003c/b\u003e Competing Interest.","formattedTitle":"“No Time for Myself”: Personality Moderates Associations Between Positive Solitude and Parental Well-being","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"nature-portfolio","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Nature Portfolio","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":false,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7200119/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7200119/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis study aimed to examine whether daily experiences of positive solitude—defined as time to oneself—relate to lower negative affect and healthier cortisol patterns in parents of underage children, and whether personality traits moderate these associations. A sample of 318 parents (Mage = 40.06 years; 45% male) with underage children completed up to 8 consecutive days of daily diaries (mood, positive solitude, stress exposure) and up to 4 days of saliva sampling (4 times/day) for cortisol analysis. Multilevel modeling examined within-person links between positive solitude, negative affect, and cortisol wake-evening slopes, controlling for daily stress. Results showed that on days when they had time to themselves, parents experienced lower negative affect and steeper cortisol slopes, indicating better stress recovery. The reduction in negative affect with positive solitude was stronger for parents high in neuroticism and openness, and high neuroticism was also linked with a stronger association between solitude and cortisol slopes. Findings underscore the potential restorative value of daily positive solitude for parents, particularly those high in neuroticism and openness. In the context of the high demands of parenting, positive solitude may serve as a valuable resource for emotional renewal, self-care, self-connection, and recovery from daily parenting stress.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"“No Time for Myself”: Personality Moderates Associations Between Positive Solitude and Parental Well-being","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-07-31 12:09:06","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7200119/v1","editorialEvents":[],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"communications-psychology","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"commspsychol","sideBox":"Learn more about [Communications Psychology](http://www.nature.com/commspsychol/)","snPcode":"44271","submissionUrl":"https://mts-commspsychol.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex","title":"Communications Psychology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Communications Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"337d99ce-f5b0-4bcd-904a-19e9c0fd465d","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 31st, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":52287817,"name":"Social science/Psychology/Human behaviour"},{"id":52287818,"name":"Health sciences/Biomarkers"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-02-14T08:10:14+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-7200119","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00396-w","journal":{"identity":"communications-psychology","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Communications Psychology"},"publishedOn":"2026-01-12 05:00:00","publishedOnDateReadable":"January 12th, 2026"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-07-31 12:09:06","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s44271-026-00396-w","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00396-w","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7200119","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7200119","identity":"rs-7200119","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0