Celebrating 30 years since the Gerhard Leyendecker and colleagues' formulation of the hyper-dysperistalsis theory in endometriosis

other OA: gold CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This paper reviews 30 years of research since Leyendecker and colleagues proposed the hyper-dysperistalsis theory for the pathogenesis of endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

This 2026 news/article in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics revisits, 30 years after Leyendecker and colleagues’ formulation, the “hyper-dysperistalsis” model describing uterine inner-myo­metrial dysperistalsis and outer-myo­metrial hypercontractility that together facilitate retrograde menstruation and tissue injury leading to adenomyosis and then endometriosis. The authors synthesize seven concepts said to have been supported by independent research, including an association of these uterine functional changes with adenomyosis (including MRI junctional zone thickening), a tissue injury and repair mechanism, the role of the basal endometrium, and the proposed tight endometriosis–adenomyosis association, while explicitly noting a major caveat that temporality has not been demonstrated and that reverse-causality bias is possible. They further propose a modified pathogenic sequence in which adenomyosis could contribute to (rather than result from) myometrial dysfunction, and they note that prevention ideas mentioned are hypothetical rather than evidence-based. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it revisits the Leyendecker hyper-dysperistalsis theory and updates a model linking uterine hypercontractility, adenomyosis, and subsequent endometriosis, with explicit emphasis on adenomyosis as a key component of the pathway.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 17,584 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · 2 sections · click to expand

Background

In recent decades, immense efforts have been devoted to understanding the origin of endometriosis. However, pro - gress has been limited and disappointing overall [1 , 2]. Looking back, the hypothesis of Gerhard Leyendecker and his colleagues clearly stands out as one of the few ideas and discoveries that have shaped the general understand- ing of the disease’s etiology. Thirty years after the initial publication describing myometrial hyper- and dysperistalsis in infertile patients with endometriosis [3 ], we honor the visionary investigators who embarked on a scientific journey to refine their model over time. While some specific potential mechanistic details of their myometrial dysfunction hypothesis have been criticized [4], seven general and innovative concepts have stood the test of time and have paved the way toward a biologically plausible explanation of the origin of adenomyosis and endometriosis. Here, we revisit these seven aspects confirmed by independ- ent research groups and propose a slightly modified patho- genic outline based on updated evidence. 1. Hyperperistalsis/dysperistalsis and myometrial hypercontractility are the functional determinants of retrograde menstruation The uterus generates peristaltic waves that originate in the inner myometrium. Wave directionality varies across the menstrual cycle, being cervico-fundal during the fol- licular phase, to accelerate the transport of spermato- zoa toward the salpinges, and fundo-cervical during the menstrual phase to facilitate the orthograde discharge of menstrual debris. The frequency and intensity of out-of- phase retrograde peristaltic waves of the inner myome- trium (dysperistalsis/hyperperistalsis) are significantly higher in patients with endometriosis than in individuals without the disease [5 ]. Moreover, convulsive contrac- tions of the outer myometrium increase the intrauterine hydrostatic pressure, thus creating a gradient between the uterine and abdominal cavities. The combined action of the inner and outer myometrium “squeezes” blood and endometrial fragments through the tubal ostia [6, 7]. 2. Hyperperistalsis/dysperistalsis and myometrial hypercontractility are associated with adenomyosis A few years after formulating the hyper-dysperistalsis hypothesis for endometriosis, Kunz et al. observed that this phenomenon was associated with abnormal thicken- ing of the endo-myometrial junctional zone on MRI [8]. At that time, this sign was proposed as a potential indi- cator of adenomyosis; today, it is one of the key imaging criteria for its diagnosis. Subsequent studies confirmed adenomyosis as the most frequent anatomical determi- nant of retrograde menstruation [9 ]. 3. Adenomyosis is associated with tissue injury and repair (TIAR) * Paolo Vercellini [email protected] Beatrice Conca [email protected] Noemi Salmeri [email protected] Veronica Bandini [email protected] Paola Viganò [email protected] Edgardo Somigliana [email protected] 1 Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Academic Centre for Research on Adenomyosis and Endometriosis, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy 2 Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Commenda 12, 20122 Milan, Italy Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2026) 313:62 62 Page 2 of 5 Leyendecker and colleagues proposed the TIAR mechanism to explain the development of adenomyosis and, consequently, endometriosis [10]. Several years later, Sun-Wei Guo described adenomyotic lesions as “fundamentally wounds undergoing repeated tissue injury and repair (ReTIAR), which progress to fibrosis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition, fibroblast-to- myofibroblast transdifferentiation, and smooth muscle metaplasia” [11]. 4. The “culprit” is the basal, not the functional, endo - metrium Leyendecker et al. proposed that the basal endome- trium is the source of both adenomyosis and endome- triosis. It infiltrates the depth of the myometrial wall, initiating adenomyosis. Additionally, once displaced into the abdominal cavity via retrograde menstruation, it implants and gives rise to endometriosis [12]. This hypothesis is relevant as the basal endometrium is rela- tively progesterone-resistant, expresses aromatase, and synthesizes estradiol locally [6, 7, 10, 12–14]. 5. Endometriosis and adenomyosis are strictly associ- ated Before Leyendecker and his colleagues published their studies, there was limited awareness of the strict associa- tion between adenomyosis and endometriosis. In their series, morphological signs of an abnormal endometrial- myometrial junction, which are compatible with adeno- myosis, were found in up to 90% of patients with endo- metriosis who were evaluated using US and MRI [6 , 8, 10, 12]. These findings opened a new line of research and changed the scientific community’s perspective on adenomyosis. Until then, adenomyosis was considered a disease of multiparous women in their late reproductive years, if not a para-physiological condition with limited clinical relevance. Bulun et al. argued that adenomyosis and endometriosis share pathogenic mechanisms to the extent that they should be considered “sister entities” [13]. 6. Endometriosis is an epiphenomenon of adenomyosis Twenty-five years ago, Leyendecker stated that adeno- myosis and endometriosis represent a unique entity, also based on the MRI findings of Kunz et al. [8 ]. He also wrote that “adenomyosis and its early manifestations constitute the primary lesion, with pelvic endometriosis being merely a sequel” and “the aetiology of endome- triosis is primarily the aetiology of adenomyosis” [15]. In our opinion, this represents a revolution in pathogenic research because the focus shifted from the peritoneum of the pelvic cavity to the uterine wall as the source of endometriosis [8 ]. Leyendecker and his colleagues further identified embryologically distinct myometrial structures, attributing different functions to the inner (archi-myometrium) and outer (neo-myometrium) myometrium. The latter would actively contribute to uterine auto-traumatization via hypercontractility and “compression by contractions” of the former, and to the development of adenomyosis [6, 7]. 7. Repetitive ovulatory menstruations trigger TIAR Habiba et al. wonder what the “primum movens” for the hyper-dysperistalsis is, what triggers TIAR, and if and how these processes can be prevented or mitigated [4]. Leyendecker et al. suppose that “ in most cases of endometriosis/adenomyosis, a causal event early in the reproductive period of life must be postulated leading rapidly to uterine hyperperistalsis” [ 10]. They also pointed out that “in the wild and also in archaic human societies non-conceptive cycles and menstruation were and still are rather infrequent incidences” and that “non- conceptional cycles, uterine hypercontractility, spon- taneous decidualization, and menstruation constitute central aspects in the pathophysiology of the disease process” [7 ]. In this regard, adolescents who experi- ence the onset of regular ovulatory menstrual cycles in the early postmenarcheal period are evolutionarily advantaged, as this indicates reproductive health, sexual maturity, and readiness to conceive. However, if dys- menorrhea (an indicator of incipient uterine auto-trau- matization) is also present and conception is delayed, they would be exposed to a higher risk of developing adenomyosis [7]. Prospectus Habiba et al. maintain that “there are no data to show that hyper- or dys-peristalsis indeed preceeds adenomyosis”. Thus, adenomyosis may be the cause rather than the result of myometrial dysfunction [4 ]. Since temporality has not been demonstrated, the sequence of events indicated by Ley- endecker may be based on reverse causality bias. The direc- tionality may be from adenomyosis to hyper-dysperistalsis and hypercontractility, instead of the reverse. Myometrial dysfunction would result from damage to the normal tis- sue structure and function caused by endometrial infiltra- tion, chronic inflammation, and eventual fibrosis. If so, then prolonged periods of repetitive ovulatory menstruation, uninterrupted by pregnancies and lactational amenorrhea [13, 14], could trigger the TIAR mechanism, rather than primary uterine auto-traumatization and biomechanical stress. Accordingly, Leyendecker and colleagues’ general concepts can be used to reinterpret the origin of adenomyo- sis and endometriosis, but with a slightly different initial temporal sequence based on considerations from Guo [10], Habiba et al. [4 ], Bulun et al. [13], Bulun [14], and Vercel- lini et al. [9], among others (Fig. 1). However, not all women with adenomyosis will develop endometriosis, because the Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2026) 313:62 Page 3 of 5 62 Fig. 1 The various steps of the pathophysiological path leading to endometriosis are based on the findings and theory of Leyendecker and colleagues [3, 6–8, 10, 12, 15], but the hypothetical sequence of initial events has been modified based on the results and interpreta- tions of Bulun [14], Bulun et  al. [13], Guo [11], Habiba et  al. [4], Salmeri et al. [5], and Vercellini et al. [9]. *The proposal for primary prevention in high-risk subpopulations is not based on evidence and only constitutes a working hypothesis. The hormonal medications indicated for secondary and tertiary prevention are a limited selec- tion of the available compounds, and relevant publications are not included in the reference list. E–P estrogen–progestogen combina- tions, P progestogen monotherapies, LNG-IUD levonorgestrel-releas- ing intrauterine device, GnRHa gonadotropin-releasing hormone ago- nists, GnRHant gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2026) 313:62 62 Page 4 of 5 sequence of pathogenic events may not inevitably progress to the final stage. Conversely, almost all patients with endo- metriosis should have even a mild form of adenomyosis, possibly reflecting a clinical or subclinical endometrial- myometrial interface dysfunction [6, 7]. Future validation of this hypothetical model would have important practical implications. If unphysiological, repeti- tive ovulatory menstruations cause the iterative uterine TIAR process that leads to adenomyosis, then the ideal sec- ondary prevention strategy for severely symptomatic young women should be pursuing ovariostasis and amenorrhea (Fig.  1) [9, 13, 14]. Indeed, Bulun is surprised that clini- cians and researchers have not yet explicitly addressed this issue [14]. Author contributions P.Ve. and B.C. conceived the text and drafted the original version of the letter. N.S., V.B., P.Vi. and E.S. participated in conceiving and drafting part of the letter and critically revising it. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. Funding The open access facility of this paper was funded by Ital- ian Ministry of Health, Current research IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan. Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. Declarations Conflict of interest P.Ve. is a member of the Editorial Board of Hu- man Reproduction Open, the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, and the International Editorial Board of Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica; has received royalties from Wolters Klu- wer for chapters on endometriosis management in the clinical decision support resource UpToDate; and maintains both a public and private gynaecological practice. P.Vi. is Co-editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders. E.S. is Editor-in-Chief of Hu- man Reproduction Open; discloses payments from Ferring and Ther - amex for research grants and personal honoraria from Merck-Serono, Ibsa, and Gedeon-Richter; and maintains both a public and private gynaecological practice. B.C., N.S., and V.B. declare they have no conflict of interest. Ethical approval Not applicable. Consent to participate Not applicable. Consent to publish Not applicable. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribu- tion and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by- nc- nd/4. 0/.

References

1. Endometriosis Initiative Group (2024) A call for new theories on the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 31:371–377. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jmig. 2024. 02. 004 2. Garcia-Velasco JA, Viganò P, Somigliana E (2025) Twenty- five years of research in endometriosis. Reprod Biomed Online 50:104830. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. rbmo. 2025. 104830 3. Leyendecker G, Kunz G, Wildt L, Beil D, Deininger H (1996) Uterine hyperperistalsis and dysperistalsis as dysfunctions of the mechanism of rapid sperm transport in patients with endo- metriosis and infertility. Hum Reprod 1:1542–1551. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ oxfor djour nals. humrep. a0194 35 4. Habiba M, Benagiano G, Guo SW (2023) An appraisal of the tissue injury and repair (TIAR) theory on the pathogenesis of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Biomolecules 13:975. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ biom1 30609 75 5. Salmeri N, Di Stefano G, Viganò P, Stratton P, Somigliana E, Vercellini P (2024) Functional determinants of uterine contrac- tility in endometriosis and adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 122:1063–1078. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fertn stert. 2024. 07. 026 6. Leyendecker G, Bilgicyildirim A, Inacker M, Stalf T, Hup- pert P, Mall G, Böttcher B, Wildt L (2015) Adenomyosis and endometriosis. Re-visiting their association and further insights into the mechanisms of auto-traumatisation. An MRI study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291:917–932. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00404- 014- 3437-8 7. Leyendecker G, Wildt L, Laschke MW, Mall G (2023) Archimetrosis: the evolution of a disease and its extant pres- entation: pathogenesis and pathophysiology of archimetrosis (uterine adenomyosis and endometriosis). Arch Gynecol Obstet 307:93–112. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00404- 022- 06597-y 8. Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, Leyendecker G (2000) Structural abnormalities of the uterine wall in women with endometriosis and infertility visualized by vaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 15:76–82. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ humrep/ 15.1. 76 9. Vercellini P, Piccini M, Caprara F, Cetera GE, Viganò P, Somigliana E (2024) Potential anatomical determinants of retro- grade menstruation: a comprehensive narrative review. Reprod Biomed Online 49:104345. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. rbmo. 2024. 104345 10. Leyendecker G, Wildt L, Mall G (2009) The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: tissue injury and repair. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280:529–538. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00404- 009- 1191-0 11. Guo SW (2022) Cracking the enigma of adenomyosis: an update on its pathogenesis and pathophysiology. Reproduction 164:R101–R121. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1530/ REP- 22- 0224 12. Leyendecker G, Herbertz M, Kunz G, Mall G (2002) Endome- triosis results from the dislocation of basal endometrium. Hum Reprod 17:2725–2736. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ humrep/ 17. 10. 2725 13. Bulun SE, Yildiz S, Adli M, Chakravarti D, Parker JB, Milad M, Yang L, Chaudhari A, Tsai S, Wei JJ, Yin P (2023) Endome- triosis and adenomyosis: shared pathophysiology. Fertil Steril 119:746–750. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fertn stert. 2023. 03. 006 Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2026) 313:62 Page 5 of 5 62 14. Bulun SE (2025) Endometriosis and ovulatory menstruation: beyond the Sampson principle. J Clin Investig 135:e188787. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1172/ JCI18 8787 15. Leyendecker G (2000) Redefining endometriosis: endometriosis is an entity with extreme pleiomorphism. Hum Reprod 15:4–7. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ humrep/ 15.1.4 Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-19T00:30:24.840492+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine