Tool Choice drastically Impacts CRISPR Spacer-Protospacer Detection

preprint OA: closed Public-Domain
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

1 CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) systems are a fundamental defense mechanism in prokaryotes, where short sequences called spacers are stored in the host genome to recognize and target exogenous genetic elements. Viromics, the study of viral communities in environmental samples, relies heavily on identifying these spacer-target interactions to understand host-virus relationships. However, the choice of sequence search tool to identify putative spacer targets is often overlooked, leading to an unknown impact of downstream inferences in virus-host analysis. Here, we utilize simulated and real datasets to compare popular sequence alignment and search tools, revealing critical differences in their ability to detect multiple matches and handle varying degrees of sequence identity between spacers and potential targets. Finally, we provide general guidelines that may inform future research regarding matching, which is a common practice in studying the complex nature of host-MGE interactions.
Full text 1,121 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
1 Abstract CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) systems are a fundamental defense mechanism in prokaryotes, where short sequences called spacers are stored in the host genome to recognize and target exogenous genetic elements. Viromics, the study of viral communities in environmental samples, relies heavily on identifying these spacer-target interactions to understand host-virus relationships. However, the choice of sequence search tool to identify putative spacer targets is often overlooked, leading to an unknown impact of downstream inferences in virus-host analysis. Here, we utilize simulated and real datasets to compare popular sequence alignment and search tools, revealing critical differences in their ability to detect multiple matches and handle varying degrees of sequence identity between spacers and potential targets. Finally, we provide general guidelines that may inform future research regarding matching, which is a common practice in studying the complex nature of host-MGE interactions. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: Public-Domain