Calcium-Magnesium Balance—Clinical Implications for Global Human Health

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) function as physiological opposites, and their ratio (Ca: Mg) is a key indicator of health status and disease risk. An imbalanced ratio—outside the optimal range of 1.7 to 2.6—has been associated with conditions such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, dementia, and infections, including complications from COVID-19 and post-COVID syndrome. Obesity is both a cause and a consequence of Ca: Mg imbalance. While traditionally measured by dietary intake (mg/day), evaluating Ca: Mg levels in the blood as mmol/L provides a more physiologically relevant perspective. Mean values for ionized Ca and Mg yield iCa: iMg that aligns with this optimal physiological range. However, since Mg ions circulate in both RBCs and plasma versus Ca ions, a 3:2 intake ratio may better support homeostasis than the commonly recommended 2:1 ratio. As Mg is essential for vitamin D synthesis, maintaining the ideal Ca: Mg ratio may enhance the conversion of vitamin D3 to 25(OH) D and the interaction of calcitriol with vitamin D receptors—potentially improving outcomes with lower vitamin D doses and significantly benefiting clinical outcomes and global health. However, the benefits of a balanced ratio extend well beyond that due to improved vitamin D efficacy. However, the benefits of a balanced ratio extend well beyond that due to improved vitamin D efficacy. Magnesium is crucial to the function of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), critical to cell membrane signaling, CYP450 enzymes, activation of B vitamins, methylation of the epigenome, glucose metabolism, and to delay age linked oxidative stress and inflammaging. Magnesium deficiency may directly contribute to the global epidemic of type 2 diabetes and its symptoms overlap those of aging. Laboratory reference ranges, NHANES data, and pertinent recent peer reviewed reports offer objective support to speculative conclusions that require clinical validation.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0