Introduction
Microorganisms create a vast array of organic molecules that are not essential to the organism’s
survival but confer them with an ecological competitive advantage. Type II polyketides are a
particularly exciting class of these secondary metabolites because of their medicinally relevant
properties (e.g. the antibiotic tetracycline and anticancer agent doxorubicin).1 These molecules are
manufactured by multi-enzyme assemblies known as type II polyketide synthases (PKSs) whic h
are spatially encoded within microbial genomes as biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs ).1 At
minimum, a type II PKS comprises an acyl carrier protein (ACP), wh ich must be post -
translationally modified via the installation of a phosphopantetheine arm to its active “holo” form,
and a ketosynthase -chain length factor (KS -CLF). The holo-ACP and KS -CLF interact to
transform malonyl-based building blocks into a nascent beta-keto polyketide chain through a series
of Claisen -like decarboxylation reactions.1 Subsequent reactions with a series of accessory
enzymes tailor the polyketide intermediate into its final polyaromatic structure. The diversity of
type II polyketides originates from variability in both the KS-CLF, which is a primary determinant
in the number of carbons in the poly -beta-keto chain, and the members of the “tailoring enzyme
roster” which catalyze the late -stage biochemical transformation and functionalization of the
polyketide backbone.1 Unlike type I synthases (or synthetases), each protein or enzyme within a
type II PKS exists as a discrete domain, making these systems uniquely conducive to mixing-and-
matching synthase components in an effort to gain access to non -native chemical diversity.
However, impaired ACP-protein interactions prevent such combinatorial biosynthesis efforts,2 so
exploring ACPs that are more suitable for mediation of these interactions is crucial.
ACPs from non -actinobacterial type II PKS s are historically understudied and represent an
interesting set of proteins to explore. While recent studies suggest that non -actinobacterial KS-
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 26, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645039doi: bioRxiv preprint
4
CLFs are uniquely amenable to expression in Escherichia coli , their cognate ACPs can be
expressed but not activated to their active holo form using conventional approaches.3–6 For
example, the Photorhabdus luminescens TT01 type II PKS ACP could not be activated by the E.
coli PPTase, AcpS, requiring the co -expression of two additional auxiliary enzymes for the
successful in vivo production of the type II polyketide in E. coli.4 A similar barrier was encountered
in the in vitro reconstitution of the Gloeocapsa sp. PC7428 type II PKS system in which neither
Sfp nor AcpS could convert the E. coli heterologously expressed apo-ACP to its holo form,
requiring strategic mutation of the ACP to enable type II PKS reconstitution in vitro.3
This activation, called phosphopantetheinylation, is catalyzed by a n enzyme known as a
phosphopantetheinyl transferase (PPTase) that installs a coenzyme A ( CoA)-derived 18-Å long,
4’-phosphopantetheine prosthetic group (Ppant arm, Figure 1A) on a conserved serine located on
the N-terminus of helix II of the ACP .7 The Ppant arm enables the ACP to tether and transport
molecular building blocks and the growing polyketide chain between the other discrete type II
PKS domains. It is well -documented that ACPs and peptidyl carrier proteins (PCPs) can be
compatible with PPT ases encoded by different BGCs within an organism ;8–10 similarly, carrier
proteins (CPs) from one organism can be activated by PPTases from different organisms
altogether11. The PPTase from the E. coli fatty acid synthase ( AcpS)12 and the PPTase from the
Bacillus subtilis surfactin non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (Sfp) 13 and its commonly used R4 -4
variant14 (referred to as ‘Sfp’ from this point forward), are well -known for their promiscuity in
converting non-cognate CPs to their holo form and are therefore widely used as biosynthetic tools.
However, as noted above, these broad substrate PPTases have limited success with activating non-
actinobacterial ACPs. Whilst the s trategic mutation of non -actinobacterial ACPs can confer Sfp
compatibility,3 identifying new PPTases which can readily activate wild type non -actinobacterial
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 26, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645039doi: bioRxiv preprint
5
ACPs will improve access to type II PKS components. Herein, we report the E. coli heterologous
expression and subsequent characterization of a previously unexplored PPTase encoded in the
Dictyobacter vulcani sp. W12 genome (vulcPPT). vulcPPT demonstrates the ability to activate
ACPs that are incompatible with Sfp and AcpS, and therefore represents an important new
contribution to the biosynthetic toolkit.
RESULTS/DISCUSSION
To identify novel promiscuous PPTases that could readily activate non -actinobacterial ACPs,
we turned to previously uncharacterized putative non-actinobacterial type II PKSs BGCs and their
associated PPTases15,16 for E. coli heterologous expression and subsequent characterization. One
such type II PKS BGC was identified in the Dictyobacter vulcani sp. W12 genome. Isolated from
the soil of the Mt. Zao volcano in Japan, D. vulcani sp. W12 is a member of the Ktedonobacteria
class, which is well known for actinomycete -like morphology and capability for secondary
metabolite production .17 antiSMASH18 analysis of the D. vulcani sp. W12 genome revealed a
putative type II PKS BGC with a unique, triad-like condensation (KS-CLF) domain architecture16
and an ACP with a non-canonical PPTase recognition motif (IDSI instead of LDSL). We selected
the sole PPTase (vulcPPT) from the annotated protein list provided in the NCBI whole genome
shotgun (WGS) Sequence Set Browser for D. vulcani sp. W12 for our heterologous expression
efforts, but three additional proteins with homology to Bacillus subtilis Sfp and Escherichia coli
AcpS were identified through BLASTp similarity searches. Interestingly, the genome is predicted
to harbor >70 CPs across several putativ e non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) and PKS
BGCs, suggesting to us that vulcPPT might display unique and/or broad substrate activity.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 26, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645039doi: bioRxiv preprint
6
The vulcPPT gene (see Methods and Table S1 in Supporting Information) was cloned into a
pET28a-derived construct for E. coli heterologous expression with an N-terminal His 6 tag and
subsequently purified via affinity column purification to a yield of 60 mg/L. The protein was
characterized via SDS-PAGE and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS; Supporting
Figures S1 and S2, respectively). The AlphaFold 319-predicted vulcPPT structure depicts vulcPPT
as a pseudo -dimer consisting of two structurally similar subdomains attached by a polypeptide
loop with high confidence (Figure S3). Together, the sequence, predicted structure, and size (249
aa) of vulcPPT suggest that vulcPPT is an Sfp-type PPTase.7 Circular dichroism (CD) wavelength
experiments demonstrate that vulcPPT contains 26.8% ɑ-helical, 8.4% antiparallel ꞵ -sheets, and
6.1% parallel ꞵ -sheets content. 20,21 Further protein melting experiments reveal a melting
temperature (Tmelt) of 45.53 ℃ (± 0.15 ℃) for vulcPPT (Figure S4 and T able S2). Preliminary
examination of its in vitro activity demonstrates that vulcPPT can fully convert its putative cognate
ACP (hereafter referred to as vulcACP) from the inactive apo form to active holo form within an
hour (Figure 1B and Supporting Information).
Figure 1. The PPTase from Dictyobacter vulcani sp. W12 (vulcPPT) converts its putative cognate
ACP from the inactive apo form to active holo form. (A) ACP activation from apo to holo form is
facilitated by a PPTase that installs the 18 Å CoA-derived phosphopantetheine (Ppant) arm on the
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 26, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645039doi: bioRxiv preprint
7
conserved serine at the N-terminus of helix II. (B) The reaction of vulcACP:vulcPPT at over 0 to
60 min (see Supporting Information for reaction conditions) , monitored by LC -MS, shows that
vulcPPT efficiently activates its native ACP partner to nearly 100% within 60 min.
To evaluate vulcPPT’s substrate scope relative to PPTases routinely used in the field, we
assessed the ability of vulcPPT, AcpS, and Sfp to phosphopantetheinylate four ACPs: (i) vulcACP,
(ii) the ACP from the E. coli fatty acid synthase (FAS) system (AcpP), (iii) the ACP from the
Streptomyces coelicolor actinorhodin type II PKS (actACP), and (iv) a previously unexplored ACP
from the Zooshikella sp. WH53 putative type II PKS BGC (zooACP). These four ACPs were
selected to represent diverse substrates , including the putative cognate ACP for vulcPPT (i), the
prototypical FAS ACP and native substrate for AcpS (ii), the prototypical type II PKS ACP (iii),
and a never-before-studied non-cognate non-actinobacterial ACP (iv). Plasmids encoding for the
four ACPs were transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells for expression in their majority (~90–
95%) inactive apo form. Phosphopantetheinylation reactions were performed by reacting an apo-
ACP with a PPTase in the presence of CoA, dithiothreitol (DTT), and MgCl 2 before be ing
quenched at 18 hours with formic acid and analyzed via liquid chromatography mass spectrometry
(LC-MS). Under the LC conditions used (see Supporting Information for details) the two forms of
the ACP ( apo and holo) elute at distinct retention times, allowing for percent conversion to be
quantified.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 26, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645039doi: bioRxiv preprint
8
Figure 2. The PPTase from Dictyobacter vulcani sp. W12 (vulcPPT) shows expanded substrate
scope compared to Sfp and AcpS for the ACPs studied. (A) The structures of Sfp (PDB 1QR0),
AcpS (PDB 5SUV), and vulcPPT (AlphaFold3 prediction) suggest that vulcPPT belongs to the
Sfp-family of PPTases. (B) VulcP PT can activate a range of ACPs, including ACPs that are not
readily activated using AcpS and Sfp. When apo-vulcACP (blue), apo-actACP (orange), apo-
AcpP (purple), and apo-zooACP (green) were reacted with Sfp, AcpS, and vulcPPT (see
Supporting Information for reaction conditions) for 18 hrs, vulcACP, actACP, AcpP were
converted to their holo forms with efficiencies ranging from 5 8% (± 4.5%) to 100% (± 0.0%) by
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 26, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645039doi: bioRxiv preprint
9
all three PPTases. In contrast, zooACP was only activated by vulcPPT, achieving a conversion
rate of 11% (± 1.5%). See Figures S5-S8 for corresponding LCMS data.
VulcPPT fully converts apo-actACP and apo-AcpP to their active holo states, matching the
activity of both AcpS and Sfp (Figure 2B). However, vulcPPT was significantly more efficient in
converting its cognate apo-vulcACP to its holo form than AcpS (100% (± 0.0%) versus 58% (±
4.5%), respectively). Interestingly, of the three PPTases studied, only vulcPPT was capable of
converting zooACP to its holo state, albeit at low efficiency (~11% (± 1.5%) holo, Figure 2B)
under non -optimized conditions. Together these data highlight the broad substrate scope of
vulcPPT and its utility in obtaining holo-ACPs that cannot be readily obtained using field-standard
PPTases. These results are particularly significant in the context of recent work on cyanobacterial
PPTases and ACPs, in which diverse PPTases could not outperform Sfp in activating
cyanobacterial CPs.22
Given promising preliminary results, we next sought to determine whether the apo to holo
conversion efficiency observed for the zooACP -vulcPPT reaction could be improved by altering
the phosphopantetheinylation conditions. The four reaction variables-- (i) temperature, (ii) pH, (iii)
vulcPPT concentration, and (iv) CoA concentration-- were assessed independently with 25 °C, pH
7.6, 1.0 µM vulcPPT, and 10x CoA as the standard conditions. First, a 35 °C incubation
temperature yielded the highest conversion to holo-zooACP (85% (± 2.2%)) within the range 20–
37 °C (Figure 3A). Second, vulcPPT produced the highest % holo conversion (27% (± 1.9%)) at
pH 7.5, with a broad pH range of activity (Figure 3B). Interestingly, optimal conversion from apo-
zooACP to holo-zooACP was observed at 3.0 µM vulcPPT and 750 µM CoA (Figures S11 and
S12, respectively). Taken together, these experiments reveal that the vulcPPT
phosphopantetheinylation reaction conditions can be tuned to improve conversion efficiency.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 26, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645039doi: bioRxiv preprint
10
Figure 3. By optimizing reaction conditions, the phosphopantetheinylation of zooACP by
vulcPPT could be improved from 11% (± 1.5%) to 87% (± 6.4%). To optimize the activation of
apo-zooACP by vulcPPT, different variables were tested: temperature at a constant pH of 7.6 (A,
more detailed version in Figure S9), pH at a constant temperature of 25 °C (B, more detailed
version in Figure S10), vulcPPT concentration (Figure S11), and CoA concentration (Figure S12).
The condition with the highest percent conversion for each condition explored is marked with a
triangle. (C) Under the optimized conditions for vulcPPT [35 °C, 7 50 µM ( 5 molar equivalents
relative to apo-zooACP = 5x) CoA, 3.0 µM PPT, pH 7.5], apo-zooACP was converted to holo-
zooACP at 87% (± 6.4%) , which is 8 -fold higher than the initial conditions explored. (D)
Phosphopantetheinylation of apo-zooACP by Sfp, AcpS, and vulcPPT under their respective
optimal conditions—pH 6.0 at 37 °C for Sfp, pH 8.8 at 37 °C for AcpS, and pH 7.5 at 35 °C for
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 26, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645039doi: bioRxiv preprint
11
vulcPPT—followed by analysis after 18 hours. The results confirm that only vulcPPT effectively
activates zooACP into its holo form under these conditions.
Next, vulcPPT phosphopantetheinylation reactions were performed on apo-zooACP using the
conditions determined to be optimal for each variable explored (3.0 µM vulcPPT, 35 °C, pH 7.5,
and 750 µM (5x) CoA , Figure 3C ). Under these conditions, we observed over 87% (± 6.4%)
conversion of apo-zooACP to its holo form. The nearly 8 -fold improvement in efficiency
compared to the result from unoptimized conditions (11% (± 1.5%)) seems to be primarily
influenced by temperature (Figure 3A). The zooACP phosphopantetheinylation react ion was
performed under identical conditions using Sfp and AcpS in place of vulcPPT which yielded only
0.5% (± 0.2%) and 3% (± 0.3%) holo-zooACP, respectively (Figure 3C). Finally, to more
accurately compare the efficiency of all three PPTases, phosphopantetheinylation reactions were
conducted on apo-zooACP using the literature-reported optimal conditions for Sfp (pH 6.0, 37 °C,
Figure 3D) and AcpS (pH 8.8, 37 °C, Figure 3D). 23,24 These reactions yielded 1% (± 0.4%) and
6% (± 1.0%) holo-zooACP, respectively–an improvement over the initial reactions using vulcPPT
optimal conditions (pH 7.6, 35 °C), yet still much lower than the >87% holo-zooACP achieved by
vulcPPT. These data support the conclusion that among the three PPTases studied, vulcPPT is the
most effective at activating zooACP. Compared to the optimal pH and temperature of AcpS and
Sfp, vulcPPT behaves optimally at less harsh pH conditions (pH 7.6) and cooler temperatures (35
°C). VulcPPT is therefore useful for reactions where substrates require more amenable conditions.
We hypothesized that the broad substrate compatibility of vulcPPT is derived from its ability to
recognize a broader spectrum of ACP motifs , as compared to Sfp and AcpS .25 To gain further
insight, the D. vulcani sp. W12 genome was analyzed using antiSMASH18 to collate a set of
putative CPs, including ACPs from type I/II PKSs and fatty acid synthases as well as PCPs from
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 26, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645039doi: bioRxiv preprint
12
non-ribosomal peptide synthetases. 79 CP genes were identified and further analyzed via multiple
sequence alignment (Figure S13). Notably, only a small percentage (6.3%) of these CPs contained
the traditionally Sfp-favored amino acid motif of DSL (where the S is the conserved serine at the
N-terminus of helix II that is the attachment point for the Ppant arm). Instead, this DSL motif was
frequently replaced by other motifs, such as DSI (44.3%, 35/79) and HSL (34.1%, 27/79) among
others. These data suggest t hat vulcPPT, which is the sole PPTase identified from the annotated
protein list in the NCBI whole genome shotgun (WGS) Sequence Set Browser for D. vulcani sp.
W12, may be capable of recognizing a broader range of interaction motifs. This sort of “crosstalk”,
where a PPTase activates more than one ACP in an organism (as opposed to having each PPTase
be specific to a single CP ), has been observed in recent years and can be leveraged in strategic
engineering work.8–11,26 Additional evidence to support this hypothesis lies in the fact that a DST
motif has been identified as a key residue that makes an ACP incompatible with Sfp. 3 Moreover,
basal expression of the E. coli AcpS could not convert the Rhizobia CP SMb20651, which contains
a DST motif, to its holo form. Conversion was only achieved by co-overexpression of the E. coli
or S. meliloti AcpS, suggesting that the presence of a DST motif instead of a DSL motif presents
barriers to accessing CPs in their holo form.7 ZooACP features a DST motif and cannot be
converted by Sfp to its holo form in any meaningful quantity. In comparison, vulcPPT has
demonstrated the ability to convert zooACP to its holo form in significant quantities, suggesting
that vulcPPT is compatible not only with the more accessible DSL, DSI, and HSL motifs but also
with the previously difficult to access DST motif.
The impact of discovering and characterizing new PPTases is highlighted by the ability of
vulcPPT to convert apo-zooACP, a non -cognate CP which was previously inaccessible using
conventional PPTases, to its active holo form. It is critical to expand the biosynthetic toolkit such
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 26, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645039doi: bioRxiv preprint
13
that diverse holo-ACPs can be accessed given that 1) holo-ACPs are an essential component to
any PKS, whether native or created via combinatorial biosynthesis, and 2) impaired ACP -protein
interactions lead to failure of a PKS to produce a polyketide product. PPTases like vulcPPT allow
us to obtain ACPs that are not accessible in their WT form and can currently only be activated by
Sfp if the ACP is strategically engineered .3,26 We hope that the introduction of vulcPPT to the
combinatorial biosynthetic toolkit will improve access to functional ACPs while also providing
additional clues that can be used to uncover the molecular underpinnings of PPTase -ACP
compatibility.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at [doi link will be inserted here later].
Detailed descriptions of materials and methods; plasmid, primer, and amino acid sequence
information; SDS -PAGE of the purified ACPs and phosphopantetheinyl transferases; LC -MS
spectra of the apo- and holo-ACPs upon phosphopantetheinylation; CD spectrum and T melt of
vulcPPT; temperature, pH, vulcPPT concentration, and coenzyme A concentration optimization
of the phosphopantetheinylation of apo-zooACP by vulcPPT; multiple sequence alignment of 79
CPs encoded by the Dictyobacter vulcani sp. W12 genome.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Authors
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 26, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645039doi: bioRxiv preprint
14
Yae In Cho (
[email protected]) and Louise K. Charkoudian (
[email protected])
Author Contributions
The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval
to the final version of the manuscript. *Co-corresponding authors.
C.M.M., C.M.F., K.K.H., L.K.C., N.B.M., K.N.M., R.F., Y.I.C. designed the research. C.M.M.,
C.M.F., K.K.H., N.B.M., K.N.M., Y.I.C. collected and analyzed data. C.M.M., C.M.F., K.K.H.,
L.K.C., Y.I.C. wrote the manuscript.
Funding Sources
We are grateful for generous support from the National Science Foundation (CHE2201984 to
L.K.C.), a 2021 Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation Scholarship and 2022 Goldwater
Scholarship (C.M.M) and Haverford College.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Professor Joris Beld (Drexel University) for helpful discussions as well as Gabriel Rocco
Sotero for technical support. We are also grateful to the 2023 Haverford College Laboratory in
Biochemical Research class for their support and guidance.
ABBREVIATIONS
PKS, polyketide synthase; BGC, biosynthetic gene cluster; ACP, acyl carrier protein; PPTase,
phosphopantetheinyl transferase; CoA, coenzyme A; AcpS, holo-(acyl carrier protein) synthase;
Sfp, 4' -phosphopantetheinyl transferase protein from Bacillus subtilis ; NRPS, nonribosomal
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 26, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645039doi: bioRxiv preprint
15
peptide synthetase; KS-CLF, ketosynthase chain length factor; Ppant arm, 4’-phosphopantetheine
prosthetic group; SDS -PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; LC -
MS, liquid chromatography mass spectrometry; CD, circular dichroism.
References
(1) Hertweck, C.; Luzhetskyy, A.; Rebets, Y.; Bechthold, A. Type II Polyketide Synthases:
Gaining a Deeper Insight into Enzymatic Teamwork. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007, 24, 162.
(2) Wong, F. T.; Khosla, C. Combinatorial Biosynthesis of Polyketides —a Perspective. Curr.
Opin. Chem. Biol. 2012, 16, 117.
(3) Li, K.; Cho, Y. I.; Tran, M. A.; Wiedemann, C.; Zhang, S.; Koweek, R. S.; Hoàng, N. K.;
Hamrick, G. S.; Bowen, M. A.; Kokona, B.; Stallforth, P.; Beld, J.; Hellmich, U. A.;
Charkoudian, L. K. Strategic Acyl Carrier Protein Engineering Enables Functiona l Type II
Polyketide Synthase Reconstitution In Vitro. ACS Chem. Biol. 2025, 20, 197.
(4) Cummings, M.; Peters, A. D.; Whitehead, G. F. S.; Menon, B. R. K.; Micklefield, J.; Webb,
S. J.; Takano, E. Assembling a Plug -and-Play Production Line for Combinatorial
Biosynthesis of Aromatic Polyketides in Escherichia coli. PLoS Biol. 2019, 17, e3000347.
(5) Liu, X.; Hua, K.; Liu, D.; Wu, Z. L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Deng, Z.; Pfeifer, B. A.; Jiang,
M. Heterologous Biosynthesis of Type II Polyketide Products Using E. coli. ACS Chem. Biol.
2020, 15, 1177.
(6) Bräuer, A.; Zhou, Q.; Grammbitter, G. L. C.; Schmalhofer, M.; Rühl, M.; Kaila, V. R. I.;
Bode, H. B.; Groll, M. Structural Snapshots of the Minimal PKS System Responsible for
Octaketide Biosynthesis. Nat. Chem. 2020, 12, 755.
(7) Beld, J.; Sonnenschein, E. C.; Vickery, C. R.; Noel, J. P.; Burkart, M. D. The
Phosphopantetheinyl Transferases: Catalysis of a Post-Translational Modification Crucial for
Life. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 61.
(8) Bunet, R.; Riclea, R.; Laureti, L.; Hôtel, L.; Paris, C.; Girardet, J.-M.; Spiteller, D.; Dickschat,
J. S.; Leblond, P.; Aigle, B. A Single Sfp -Type Phosphopantetheinyl Transferase Plays a
Major Role in the Biosynthesis of PKS and NRPS Derived Metabolites in Streptomyces
Ambofaciens ATCC23877. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87607.
(9) Jones, C. V.; Jarboe, B. G.; Majer, H. M.; Ma, A. T.; Beld, J. Escherichia coli Nissle 1917
Secondary Metabolism: Aryl Polyene Biosynthe sis and Phosphopantetheinyl Transferase
Crosstalk. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 7785.
(10) Wang, Y. -Y.; Zhang, X. -S.; Luo, H. -D.; Ren, N. -N.; Jiang, X. -H.; Jiang, H.; Li, Y. -Q.
Characterization of Discrete Phosphopantetheinyl Transferases in Streptomyces
Tsukubaensis L19 Unveils a Complicate Phosphopantetheinylation Network. Sci. Rep. 2016,
6, 24255.
(11) Pedersen, T. B.; Nielsen, M. R.; Kristensen, S. B.; Spedtsberg, E. M. L.; Sørensen, T.;
Petersen, C.; Muff, J.; Sondergaard, T. E.; Nielsen, K. L.; Wimmer, R.; Gardiner, D. M.;
Sørensen, J. L. Speed Dating for Enzymes! Finding the Perfect Phosphopante theinyl
Transferase Partner for Your Polyketide Synthase. Microb. Cell Fact. 2022, 21, 9.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 26, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645039doi: bioRxiv preprint
16
(12) Lambalot, R. H.; Walsh, C. T. Cloning, Overproduction, and Characterization of the
Escherichia coli Holo-Acyl Carrier Protein Synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 24658.
(13) Lambalot, R. H.; Gehring, A. M.; Flugel, R. S.; Zuber, P.; LaCelle, M.; Marahiel, M. A.;
Reid, R.; Khosla, C.; Walsh, C. T. A New Enzyme Superfamily - the Phosphopantetheinyl
Transferases. Chem. Biol. 1996, 3, 923.
(14) Sunbul, M.; Marshall, N. J.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, K.; Yin, J. Catalytic Turnover -Based Phage
Selection for Engineering the Substrate Specificity of Sfp Phosphopantetheinyl Transferase.
J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 387, 883.
(15) Hillenmeyer, M. E.; Vandova, G. A.; Berlew, E. E.; Charkoudian, L. K. Evolution of
Chemical Diversity by Coordinated Gene Swaps in Type II Polyketide Gene Clusters. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 13952.
(16) McBride, C. M.; Miller, E. L.; Charkoudian, L. K. An Updated Catalogue of Diverse Type II
Polyketide Synthase Biosynthetic Gene Clusters Captured from Large -Scale Nucleotide
Databases. Microb. Genom. 2023, 9, mgen000965.
(17) Zheng, Y.; Wang, C.; Sakai, Y.; Abe, K.; Yokota, A.; Yabe, S. Dictyobacter Vulcani Sp.
Nov., Belonging to the Class Ktedonobacteria, Isolated from Soil of the Mt Zao Volcano. Int.
J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 1805.
(18) Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Augustijn, H. E.; Reitz, Z. L.; Biermann, F.; Alanjary, M.; Fetter, A.;
Terlouw, B. R.; Metcalf, W. W.; Helfrich, E. J. N.; van Wezel, G. P.; Medema, M. H.; Weber,
T. antiSMASH 7.0: New and Improved Predictions for Detection, Regul ation, Chemical
Structures and Visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W46.
(19) Abramson, J.; Adler, J.; Dunger, J.; Evans, R.; Green, T.; Pritzel, A.; Ronneberger, O.;
Willmore, L.; Ballard, A. J.; Bambrick, J.; Bodenstein, S. W.; Evans, D. A.; Hung, C. -C.;
O’Neill, M.; Reiman, D.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Wu, Z.; Žemgulytė, A.; Arvaniti, E.; Beattie,
C.; Bertolli, O.; Bridgland, A.; Cherepanov, A.; Congreve, M.; Cowen-Rivers, A. I.; Cowie,
A.; Figurnov, M.; Fuchs, F. B.; Gladman, H.; Jain, R.; Khan, Y. A.; Low, C. M. R.; Perlin,
K.; Potapenko, A.; Savy, P.; Singh, S.; Stecula, A.; Thillaisundaram, A.; Tong, C.; Yakneen,
S.; Zhong, E. D.; Zielinski, M.; Žídek, A.; Bapst, V.; Kohli, P.; Jaderberg, M.; Hassabis, D.;
Jumper, J. M. Accurate Structure Prediction of Biomolecular Interactions with AlphaFold 3.
Nature 2024, 630, 493.
(20) Micsonai, A.; Wien, F.; Bulyáki, É.; Kun, J.; Moussong, É.; Lee, Y.-H.; Goto, Y.; Réfrégiers,
M.; Kardos, J. BeStSel: A Web Server for Accurate Protein Secondary Structure Prediction
and Fold Recognition from the Circular Dichroism Spectra. Nucleic Acids Res . 2018, 46,
W315.
(21) Micsonai, A.; Wien, F.; Kernya, L.; Lee, Y.-H.; Goto, Y.; Réfrégiers, M.; Kardos, J. Accurate
Secondary Structure Prediction and Fold Recognition for Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2015, 112, E3095.
(22) Liu, T.; Mazmouz, R.; Neilan , B . An In Vitro and In Vivo Study of Broad -Range
Phosphopantetheinyl Transferases for Heterologous Expression of Cyanobacterial Natural
Products. ACS Chem. Biol. 2018, 7, 1143.
(23) Quadri, L. E.; Weinreb, P. H.; Lei, M.; Nakano, M. M.; Zuber, P.; Walsh, C. T.
Characterization of Sfp, a Bacillus Subtilis Phosphopantetheinyl Transferase for Peptidyl
Carrier Protein Domains in Peptide Synthetases. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 1585.
(24) Flugel, R. S.; Hwangbo, Y.; Lambalot, R. H.; Cronan, J. E.; Walsh, C. T. Holo-(Acyl Carrier
Protein) Synthase and Phosphopantetheinyl Transfer in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2000,
275, 959.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 26, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645039doi: bioRxiv preprint
17
(25) Finking, R.; Marahiel, M. A. Biosynthesis of Nonribosomal peptides 1. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
2004, 58, 453.
(26) Brown, A. S.; Owen, J. G.; Ackerley, D. F. Directed Evolution of the BpsA Carrier Protein
Domain for Recognition by Non -Cognate 4 ′-Phosphopantetheinyl Transferases to
Enable Inhibitor Screening . In Non-Ribosomal Peptide Biosynthesis and Engineering ;
Burkart, M., Ishikawa, F., Eds.; Springer US: New York, NY, 2023; Vol. 2670, pp 145–163.
TABLE OF CONTENTS GRAPHIC
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 26, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645039doi: bioRxiv preprint