Genome-wide association study and KASP marker development for flour color in winter wheat

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Flour color influences the quality of end-use products of common wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). To analyze the genetic basis of flour color, the flour brightness (FL*), red-green level (Fa*), yellow-blue level (Fb*), and whiteness (W) of 341 winter wheat materials grown during the 2019-2020 years and 2020-2021 years in Emin and Qitai were measured. A genome-wide association study was conducted using a wheat 40K breeding chip with the MLM model. The coefficient of variation and generalized heritability of wheat flour color traits ranged from 0.62% to 22.23% and 0.58 to 0.83, respectively. There were strong correlations across the flour color traits. GWAS identified 20 significant and stable SNP markers distributed across 16 loci, including 1 for FL* located on chromosome 5D; 6 for Fa*, located on chromosomes 1A, 5A, 1B (2), 6B, and 4D; 6 for Fb*, located on chromosomes 2A (2), 4A, 4B, 6B, and 5D; and 3 for W, located on chromosomes 2A, 4A, and 5D. Two KASP markers were developed for Fa*, which exhibited good genotype and significant phenotypic differences among materials with different genotypes. Seven candidate genes that may affect flour color during grain development were screened, including TraesCS5D02G01340.1 , TraesCS5D02G013100 , and TraesCS5D02G014300.1 on the 5D chromosome may simultaneously influence W, FL*, and Fa*, TraesCS1B02G269100.1 and TraesCS1B02G269500.1 on the 1B chromosome may impact Fa*, while TraesCS4A02G307200 and TraesCS6B02G034100.1 on the 4A and 6B chromosomes may affect Fb*.The results provide useful information to enhance the color quality of wheat flour in wheat.
Full text 175,643 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Genome-wide association study and KASP marker development for flour color in winter wheat | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Genome-wide association study and KASP marker development for flour color in winter wheat Yousheng Tian, Pengpeng Liu, Xin Zhang, Yichen Liu, Dezhen Kong, and 5 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6620467/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 12 Nov, 2025 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted 11 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Flour color influences the quality of end-use products of common wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). To analyze the genetic basis of flour color, the flour brightness (FL*), red-green level (Fa*), yellow-blue level (Fb*), and whiteness (W) of 341 winter wheat materials grown during the 2019-2020 years and 2020-2021 years in Emin and Qitai were measured. A genome-wide association study was conducted using a wheat 40K breeding chip with the MLM model. The coefficient of variation and generalized heritability of wheat flour color traits ranged from 0.62% to 22.23% and 0.58 to 0.83, respectively. There were strong correlations across the flour color traits. GWAS identified 20 significant and stable SNP markers distributed across 16 loci, including 1 for FL* located on chromosome 5D; 6 for Fa*, located on chromosomes 1A, 5A, 1B (2), 6B, and 4D; 6 for Fb*, located on chromosomes 2A (2), 4A, 4B, 6B, and 5D; and 3 for W, located on chromosomes 2A, 4A, and 5D. Two KASP markers were developed for Fa*, which exhibited good genotype and significant phenotypic differences among materials with different genotypes. Seven candidate genes that may affect flour color during grain development were screened, including TraesCS5D02G01340.1 , TraesCS5D02G013100 , and TraesCS5D02G014300.1 on the 5D chromosome may simultaneously influence W, FL*, and Fa*, TraesCS1B02G269100.1 and TraesCS1B02G269500.1 on the 1B chromosome may impact Fa*, while TraesCS4A02G307200 and TraesCS6B02G034100.1 on the 4A and 6B chromosomes may affect Fb*.The results provide useful information to enhance the color quality of wheat flour in wheat. Biological sciences/Genetics Biological sciences/Molecular biology Biological sciences/Plant sciences Wheat Flour color GWAS KASP markers Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 1 Introduction Flour color is an important characteristic in evaluating flour quality for many final product productions 1 , reflecting flour quality and milling accuracy, and serves as a significant indicator for flour grading. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the study of flour color to improve the quality of wheat products and meet the market's development needs 2 . The color of flour and its products primarily depends on the accumulation of pigment substances, such as yellow pigments and carotenoids, in the flour. Previous studies have shown that phytoene synthase (Psy) 3 , polyphenol oxidase (Ppo) 4 , lipoxygenase (Lox) 5 , 6 , and some other peroxidase enzymes in wheat grains affect the color, processing quality, milling quality, storage characteristics, and other quality traits of flour or flour products through the oxidative degradation of pigment substances. The yellowness of flour is mainly influenced by the quantity of carotenoids, lutein, and flavonoids 7 . The yellow pigment content in wheat flour is affected by Lox activity, which converts oxidative carotenoids to make wheat flour white 8 . Psy1 is the initial step in catalyzing carotenoid biosynthesis and serves as a crucial regulatory point, strongly correlated with carotenoid accumulation ( r = 0.8) 9 , directly affecting the color of grain endosperm and flour. In the presence of molecular oxygen, Ppo catalyzes the oxidation of phenols to form quinones 10 , which can polymerize to create high molecular weight black or brown pigments, thereby affecting the color of wheat products, especially yellow alkaline and white salted noodles 11 . Peroxidase (POD) is a reductase that can oxidize primary phenolic acids, such as ferulic acid, leading to the formation of chromogenic groups and brown substances 12 . High POD activity may cause the flour to darken, subsequently leading to suboptimal noodle color 13 . The browning index of noodle products is significantly correlated with POD activity ( r = 0.84–0.97) 14 . The color of flour has a significant impact on the quality of the final wheat product. Miskelly 7 found a significant correlation between the color of flour and the yellowing of noodles in China and Japan. Flour with a high yellow pigment content is the preferred choice for producing alkaline noodles in China and Japan. In many Asian countries, noodles are made with specially selected flour to enhance the color of the final product 15 . Therefore, yellow noodles from Japan and China require high b* value flour 16 . However, other end products, such as bread, steamed bread, dry white noodles, and dumplings, require white flour with a very low b* value. Similarly, in the United States and other parts of the world, white flour with extremely low b* values (0) and high L* values (100) is ideal for bread baking 17 . Flour color is a quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes with high heritability 18 . Environmental and management measures may also affect the color of flour. Grain protein content, hardness, seed coat color, grain size, and shape may all contribute to changes in flour color 19 . Previous studies have reported the discovery of QTLs that affect flour color near the hardness sites ( Pina and Pinb ) on chromosome 5DS 2 , 20 – 22 . It is speculated that these SNP markers may also control flour color through grain hardness. At the same milling extraction rate, the flour color of low-protein wheat is whiter than that of high-protein wheat. The a* value of wheat flour with a red seed coat is higher than that of wheat with a white seed coat 19 . Improving the color of flour is an important breeding goal for wheat. Under conventional breeding methods, the efficiency of selecting this trait is relatively low. Genetic improvement is the most effective method for enhancing the color quality of wheat. GWAS is an effective tool for understanding the genetic loci of quantitative traits and marker-assisted selection (MAS) in wheat. This study identified significant association sites for flour color through GWAS, providing a reference for future MAS breeding of flour color and the cloning of color-related genes. 2 Materials and Methods 2.1 Plant Materials and Field Trials The association panel consists of 341 winter wheat varieties and advanced breeding lines from various wheat regions in China excluding Libellula and Strampellula (Table S1 ). The validation of KASP markers was conducted using 200 winter wheat materials, referred to as the validation panel in this study. This panel included various wheat varieties and advanced breeding lines from both domestic and international sources (Table S2). Among them, 193 materials were different from those in the association panel, while the other 7 materials were part of the association panel. The genotypes of the 7 materials at the KASP marker development site were known, which was used to confirm the accuracy of KASP marker typing. The validation panel was used to verify the success of developing KASP markers. The association panel was evaluated at two sites, including the Institutes of Agriculture Sciences in Emin and Qitai, Xinjiang, China, during the years 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 (hereafter referred to as 2020EM, 2020QT, 2021EM, and 2021QT, respectively). The validation panel was planted in Shihezi, Xinjiang, China, during the years 2020–2021 and 2021–2022. The experiment was conducted using an alpha-lattice design with two replications. Each replication consisted of 18 incomplete blocks, with each block comprising 19 genotypes. Each genotype was grown in a plot measuring 1.8 m in length and 8 rows with 0.25 m spacing between them, each row sowed 40 seeds. Recommended management practices were applied to the trials at their respective locations. Plots were hand-harvested at maturity, and the grain was stored at 4°C. Using the MLU202 Mill (Wuxi, China), the grain was ground and passed through a 0.1-micron sieve. These flour samples were stored in airtight containers. 2.2 Phenotype test The whiteness of the flour was measured using an intelligent whiteness tester (WSB-V, Zhejiang, China). Place the sample into the sample box, compact it with a pressure pad, cover it with the lid, invert the sample box, unscrew the bottom cover, remove the glass plate, and position the sample box on the measurement base for whiteness assessment. The parameters of the colorimeter were measured using the CR-410 colorimeter (Konica Minolta, Japan), which are represented by L*, a*, and b* color spaces. L* represents brightness, where L* = 0 represents black, and L* = 100 represents white, with a total of 100 levels in between. The a* and b* values represent different color spaces. Specifically, a* represents the red-green direction, while b* represents the yellow-blue direction. In this context, +a* signifies a reddish hue, -a* indicates a greenish hue, +b* denotes a yellowish hue, and -b* signifies a bluish hue. 2.3 Genome-Wide Association Study Genotyping was conducted using wheat GBTS 40K breeding chips. Markers with a minor allele frequency (MAF) below 5% and missing data exceeding 10% were excluded from further analysis. Population structure was assessed using clustering analysis software Structure v2.3.4 based on Bayesian models 23 . PCA analysis and LD analysis were performed using TASSEL 5.0 24 . The association panel was divided into two subgroups, with an LD decay distance of 4 Mb, which was detailed in our previous article 25 . We used the MLM model in TASSEL 5.0 24 for GWAS and utilize the population structure (Q matrix) and kinship matrix (K matrix) as covariates to prevent false positives. According to Sheoran et al. 26 , when the significance test reached P < 0.0001 (-log10( P ) ≥ 4), it was determined that the marker was significantly associated with the trait. If multiple SNPs controlling a trait were identified to fall within one LD interval, they were referred to as one locus 25 . Based on previous research reports, loci associated with multiple phenotypic traits were termed pleiotropic loci, while loci consistently identified in at least two environments were considered stable loci 27 . 2.4 Development and Verification of KASP Marker Select SNPs that were significantly and stably identified in various environments for transformation into KASP markers. We utilized the online software Polymarker ( http://www.polymarker.info/ ) to design two allele-specific forward primers and one common reverse primer. Standard FAM tags (5' GAAGGTGAGTCATGCT 3') and HEX tags (5' GAAGGTCGAGTCAACGGATT 3') were attached to the 5' ends of the two allele-specific primers, respectively. According to the descending thermal cycle protocol described by the manufacturer (LGC Genomics, Beverly, MA, USA), SNP genotyping was performed on an ABI7500 instrument using a 96-well plate. The genotyping outcomes were assessed using ABI7500 software, supplemented by manual assessment based on fluorescence values 28 . A t -test was conducted to detect significant differences in phenotypic traits between alleles. The primer pair sequences for PCR amplification are listed in Table S3. 2.5 Identification of candidate genes In order to identify potential candidate genes related to flour color traits, the IWGSC online database ( http://www.wheatgenome.org/ ) was used to search for all genes within the stable SNP marker LD region (2 Mb upstream and 2 Mb downstream of SNP flank). Protein function prediction of candidate genes was performed using the UniProt protein database ( https://www.uniprot.org/ ) and the Ensembl plants database ( http://plants.ensembl.org/Triticum_aestivum/Gene ). The transcriptome data from different stages of seed maturation in the publicly available Expression Atlas database ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/Experiments/E-MTAB-4484/Results ) were used to study the expression characteristics of these genes 29 . Based on functional annotation, we selected genes that were highly expressed at different stages of grain maturation, as well as genes that overlap with stable SNPs for further analysis. We utilized qRT-PCR to detect the expression levels of candidate genes in 5-day, 10-day, 15-day, 20-day, 25-day, and 30-day seeds after anthesis of extreme flour color materials. The extreme color materials were "Hongzhitou" and "Yupilaina", and their color traits are detailed in Table S4. Total RNA was isolated from two-week-old leaves using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. The concentration of total RNA was measured spectrophotometrically using a NanoDrop instrument (Thermo Scientific NanoDrop 2000C Technologies, Wilmington, USA), and the purity was assessed using the A260/A280 and A260/A230 ratios provided by NanoDrop. Reverse transcription was carried out using a PrimeScriptTM first-strand complementary DNA (cDNA) Synthesis Kit (TaKaRa, Japan). qRT-PCR was performed using an iCycler iQTM Multicolor PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). qPCR was performed with cDNA in triplicate on 96-well plates using SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM II (TaKaRa). Each reaction (20 µL) consisted of 10 µL of SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM II, 1 µL of diluted cDNA, 0.4 µL of forward and reverse primers, and 8.2 µL of H 2 O. qPCR cycling conditions were as follows: 95°C for 2 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 seconds, 57°C for 32 seconds. Fluorescence data were collected during the 57°C step. Wheat Actin (Genebank ID: LOC123114174) was used as a reference gene. The gene ID and primer sequences are listed in Table S5. 2.6 Statistical analysis A multi-environment trial analysis was conducted using R software to perform the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) value 30 was calculated using the R package lme4 31 . Broad-sense heritability ( h 2 ) was estimated from variance components using the formula: h 2 = σ 2 G / (σ 2 G + σ 2 GE /E + σ 2 e /rE), where σ 2 G , represents the genetic variance, σ 2 GE represents the genotype × environment interaction variance, σ 2 e represents the residual variance, E represents the number of environments, and r represents the number of replicates per line 32 . Pearson’s correlation between phenotypic traits was computed using SPSS 22 ( http://www.brothersoft.com/ibm-spss-statistics-469577.html ). Other ANOVA and plots were conducted in SPSS 22 and Origin 8.0, respectively. Manhattan and Q-Q plots were created using the "qqman" package in R software 33 . Gene expression heatmap was performed using TBtools 34 . 3 Results 3.1 Phenotyping Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the association panel showed that, except for no significant difference in whiteness between environments, there were extremely significant differences in other flour color traits among genotypes, environments, and years. In addition, Fa* and Fb* showed extremely significant differences in genotype and environmental interactions, whiteness showed extremely significant differences in genotype and environmental interactions, and genotype and year interactions (Table 1 ). The variation ranges of FL*, Fa*, Fb*, and whiteness in different environments were 88.17–93.36, (-1.76)-(-0.34), 5.74–11.95, and 68.60–82.20, respectively. The variation ranges of coefficient variation were 0.62%-0.68%, 19.09%-22.23%, 8.36%-11.88%, and 2.25%-2.44%, respectively. The values of h ² were 0.56, 0.56, 0.83, and 0.83, respectively (Table 2 ). The frequency distribution of flour color traits based on BLUP values was approximately normal (Fig. 1 ). Correlation analysis was conducted on the color traits of flour based on BLUP values (Table 3 ). Highly significant correlations were observed between FL* and Fa*, Fb*, and whiteness, with correlation coefficients of -0.251, -0.316, and 0.738, respectively. Additionally, highly significant correlations were found between Fa* and Fb*, as well as whiteness, with correlation coefficients of -0.645 and 0.225, respectively. Furthermore, a highly significant negative correlation was identified between Fb* and whiteness, with a correlation coefficient of -0.764. Table 1 Analysis of variance for color quality traits in 341 winter wheat Source of variance df Sum of squares FL* Fa* Fb* Whiteness Genotypes 340 0.7 *** 0.131 *** 2.59 *** 10 *** Environments 1 51.8 *** 8.543 *** 66.92 *** 0.5 Years 1 345.5 *** 0.254 *** 36.99 *** 2118.5 *** Genotypes×Environments 339 0.2 0.015 ** 0.24 ** 1.2 *** Genotypes×Years 339 0.2 0.01 0.13 1.2 *** Residual 332 0.2 0.011 0.18 0.7 *** indicate significant differences at P < 0.001; ** indicate significant differences at P < 0.01. Table 2 Phenotypic variations and heritability of color quality traits Trait Environment Minimum Maximum Mean SD CV (%) h 2 FL * 2020EM 88.17 91.60 89.74 0.61 0.68 0.56 2020QT 88.52 91.98 90.30 0.58 0.64 2021EM 89.19 92.70 90.94 0.56 0.62 2021QT 89.36 93.16 91.14 0.57 0.62 Fa * 2020EM -1.55 -0.34 -0.87 0.19 22.23 0.56 2020QT -1.75 -0.54 -1.06 0.22 21.19 2021EM -1.45 -0.45 -0.93 0.18 19.09 2021QT -1.76 -0.46 -1.05 0.23 21.42 Fb * 2020EM 6.24 10.35 8.39 0.70 8.36 0.83 2020QT 6.51 11.95 9.13 0.94 10.33 2021EM 6.10 10.88 8.36 0.83 9.98 2021QT 5.74 11.70 8.50 1.01 11.88 Whiteness 2020EM 69.50 78.50 73.54 1.65 2.25 0.83 2020QT 68.60 78.90 73.36 1.77 2.41 2021EM 71.10 81.20 75.95 1.85 2.44 2021QT 70.40 82.20 75.99 1.96 2.58 2020EM, 2020QT, 2021EM, and 2021QT, the cropping seasons of 2019 ~ 2020 and 2020 ~ 2021 in E’min (EM) and Qitai (QT) respectively; SD, standard deviation; CV, coefficient of variation; h 2 , heritability. Table 3 Phenotypic correlations ( r ) of the flour color traits for the wheat association panel Trait FL * Fa* Fb* Fa* -0.251 ** Fb* -0.316 ** -0.645 ** Whiteness 0.738 ** 0.225 ** -0.764 ** ** indicates significant differences at P < 0.01. 3.2 Genome-wide association study for flour color traits Based on BLUP values, GWAS identified 31 marker-trait associations (MTAs) for flour color traits (Fig. 2 ; Table S6), including 2 MTAs for FL*, 16 MTAs for Fa*, 10 MTAs for Fb*, and 3 MTAs for whiteness. These MTAs were distributed on chromosomes 1A, 1B, 2A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 4D, 5A, 5B, 5D, 6A, 6B, 6D, and 7B, explaining 5.52–19.91% of phenotypic variation (Table S6). Simultaneously, GWAS was performed in each environment, and a total of 20 stable association signals were detected, distributed across 16 loci (Table 4 ), including 1 locus for FL* located on chromosome 5D; 6 loci for Fa*, located on chromosomes 1A, 5A, 1B (2), 6B, and 4D; 6 loci for Fb*, located on chromosomes 2A (2), 4A, 4B, 6B, and 5D; 3 loci for whiteness, located on chromosomes 2A, 4A, and 5D. The marker 6B_20151350 was significantly and stably associated with both Fa* and Fb*; The marker 4A_601242583 was significantly and stably associated with both Fb* and whiteness; The marker 5D_6525346 was significantly and stably associated with FL*, Fb*, and whiteness. These markers were considered to be pleiotropic loci (Table 4 ). Table 4 Significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for flour color quality traits were identified in multiple environments Trait Environment Marker P -value R 2 (%) E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 FL* E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 5D_6525346 7.12E-10 4.98E-09 2.58E-06 3.56E-05 3.87E-14 13.41 12 8.21 6.27 19.91 Fa* E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 1B_473486955 2.85E-05 6.63E-05 4.67E-05 8.04E-05 5.92E-06 6.49 5.91 6.39 5.79 7.36 E3 E5 1B_503482454 9.02E-05 6.01E-05 5.97 5.92 5A_671439068 3.87E-05 5.06E-06 6.53 7.46 5A_671479200 6.07E-05 2.67E-05 6.22 6.41 E3 E4 E5 6B_20151350 4.29E-05 2.57E-05 3.93E-06 6.86 6.82 7.86 E1 E4 E5 1A_236720351 1.50E-05 9.07E-06 2.01E-05 5.8 6.06 5.52 E4 E5 1B_474382447 5.19E-05 3.79E-05 6.07 6.19 4D_238181951 1.55E-05 1.80E-05 5.74 5.58 E2 E5 1B_473235903 7.11E-05 6.87E-05 5.88 5.82 E1 E3 E5 1B_504760661 1.13E-07 9.64E-06 1.43E-06 10.8 7.85 8.90 Fb* E1 E2 E4 E5 6B_20151350 6.73E-06 3.94E-05 1.14E-05 6.05E-07 7.7 6.41 7.26 9.04 E1 E3 E4 E5 5D_6525346 7.59E-07 1.31E-05 8.51E-05 1.90E-05 8.83 7.16 5.74 6.62 E1 E5 2A_104922253 1.37E-05 8.95E-05 6.96 5.65 2A_117110052 5.14E-05 8.07E-05 6.11 5.72 E3 E5 4A_601242583 5.82E-05 9.00E-05 6.18 5.65 4B_148210072 3.46E-05 9.67E-05 6.52 5.61 Whiteness E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 5D_6525346 5.59E-12 6.41E-07 6.50E-10 1.06E-06 2.2E-11 16.66 8.83 13.85 8.56 15.57 E1 E5 2A_348674245 4.43E-05 2.1E-05 6.43 7.41 E2 E3 4A_601242583 8.36E-05 3.61E-05 5.73 6.47 E1, 2020EM; E2, 2020QT; E3, 2021EM; E4, 2021QT, which represent the cropping seasons in Emin (EM) and Qitai (QT) for the years 2019 ~ 2020 and 2020 ~ 2021, respectively; E5, BLUP, the best linear unbiased predictor of protein quality traits in 341 wheat accessions during two cropping seasons across two environments. 3.3 Development and Validation of KASP Markers Materials were classified based on genotypes of significant and stable SNPs, and t -tests were used to detect the significance of genotype effects on phenotypic traits (Table S7). SNPs with highly significant genotypic effects in the four environments of 2020EM, 2020QT, 2021EM, and 2021QT were selected to develop KASP markers (Table S7). The KASP marker developed for SNP 1A_236720351 could effectively group the validation subset based on allele genotype (Fig. 3 A). In this study, only AA homozygotes and AG heterozygotes were found in the validation subset, and no GG homozygotes were present. The Fa* of AA homozygous genotype was significantly higher ( P < 0.05) than that of AG heterozygous genotype (Fig. 3 B). The KASP marker developed for SNP 1B_473486955 could significantly group the materials of the AA, AG, and GG genotypes in the validation subset (Fig. 3 C), and the Fa* of the GG homozygous genotype was significantly higher compared to the AA homozygous genotype (Fig. 3 D). 3.4 Candidate Genes for flour color traits SNPs that were significantly and stably associated with flour color traits, and showed significant differences in phenotype between different haplotypes across four environments (2020EM, 2020QT, 2021EM, and 2021QT; P < 0.001; Table S7) were selected to search for candidate genes. A total of 410 genes were detected within 2 Mb upstream and 2 Mb downstream sequences flanking those SNPs. Among them, genes before and after SNPs, and genes overlapping with SNPs were shown in Table S8, with 17 SNPs located in the intergenic region and 3 SNPs located within genes. GO enrichment analysis showed that these genes were involved in a total of 439 GO terms, classified into 15 biological processes, 2 cellular components, and 10 molecular functions. Most genes were mainly concentrated in metabolic processes and cellular processes of biological processes, cellular anatomical entities and protein-containing complexes of cellular components, and binding and catalytic activities of molecular functions (Figure S1 C). KEGG analysis showed that these genes were mainly enriched in metabolic pathways, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, steroid biosynthesis, photosynthesis, oxidative phosphorylation, ribosome, and other processes (Figure S1 B). Based on the RNA-seq data from a public expression database and functional annotations of those genes, and also considering genes that overlap with significant SNPs, the present study selected 7 candidate genes for qRT-PCR analysis. The relative quantitative data were transformed by log10, and a heatmap was drawn (Figure S1 A). Six candidate genes were differentially expressed in seeds of flour color extreme materials (Fig. 4 ; Table S9). TraesCS5D02G013100 encodes PMA1, which was differentially expressed in 30-day seeds after anthesis of extreme materials; TraesCS5D02G014300.1 encodes P450, which was differentially expressed in 15-day seeds after anthesis of extreme materials; TraesCS1B02G269500.1 encodes isopentenyl diphosphate delta isomerase, which was differentially expressed in 25-day and 30-day seeds after anthesis of extreme materials; TraesCS6B02G034100.1 encodes the DExH-box ATP-dependent RNA helicase DExH12, which was differentially expressed in 20-day, 25-day, and 30-day seeds after flowering of extreme materials; This study did not annotate the protein function of gene TraesCS4A02G307200 , which was differentially expressed in seeds of extreme materials at 20, 25, and 30 days after flowering; TraesCS1B02G269100.1 encodes glutathione transferase, which was differentially expressed in 25-day and 30-day seeds of materials after flowering (Fig. 4 ; Table S9). 4 Discussion 4.1 Analysis of Flour Color Traits The whiteness and color-related traits of flour are crucial factors that determine the quality of the final wheat product. Therefore, it is essential to identify the main and stable allele loci for these traits and then transfer these favorable alleles to the commodity variety 2 . In this study, significant differences were observed in the flour color traits among different genotypes, environments, and years, except for whiteness among different environments (Table 1), indicating that flour whiteness was mainly controlled by genotype rather than environmental factors 35 . Flour whiteness and FL* showed high heritability in this study (Table 2), suggesting that these traits were primarily controlled by genetics, making them easier to improve and breed at the genetic level 36 . All color traits exhibited a continuous distribution in the association panel (Figure 1), displaying typical quantitative trait characteristics, indicating that they were controlled by polygenic inheritance, consistent with previous report 2 . Correlation analysis revealed highly significant correlations between flour color traits (Table 3), which align with previous research results 2, 22, 36, 37 . 4.2 Genome-wide association study for FL* This study consistently identified one locus on chromosome 5D ( 5D_6525346 ) significantly associated with FL*, explaining the highest phenotypic variation rate of 19.91%. In line with the finding of Chen et al. 38 , who pinpointed a significant marker wPt-0853-cfd18 associated with FL* at 5,597,656 bp on chromosome 5D. Previous research has also identified the primary QTL/genes influencing FL* on chromosomes 2A, 3A, 4A, 6A, 7A, 1B, 3B, 4B, 5B, 7B, 2D, 4D, and 5D 2,39-43 . For instance, Schmidt et al. 42 identified a QTL associated with FL* on chromosome 4B ( R 2 =5%). Martin et al. 40 reported that QTLs for FL* were located on chromosome arms 3AS, 7AL, 3BL, 4BS, 5BL, 7BL, and 2DS. Zhao et al. 43 detected 13 QTLs for FL* on chromosomes 1A, 6A, 1B, 2B, 3B, 5B, 7B, 2D, and 5D using the recombinant inbred line 'Chuan 35050 × Shannong 483' as the material. 4.3 Genome-wide association study for Fa* This study identified 6 loci significantly and stably associated with Fa* on chromosomes 1A, 5A, 1B, 6B, and 4D (Table 4). Similarly, previous studies identified QTL/genes linked to flour Fa* on chromosomes 1A, 3A, 4A, 6A, 7A, 3B, 5B, 6B, 7B, 4D, 5D, and 7D 2,39,41 . Zhao et al. 43 identified 12 QTL/genes associated with Fa* on chromosomes 3A, 5A, 6A, 1B, 2B, 4B, 6B, 7B, and 5D. Zhang et al. 36 used 240 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from crossing the Chinese wheat variety PH82-2 with Neixiang 188 to map the QTLs of Fa* on chromosome 1A, 4A, 7A, 1B, and 3B, explaining up to 35.9% of the phenotypic variation. Additionally, Zhang et al. 37 employed 168 diploid (DH) lines hybridized with Huapei 39 and Yumai 57 to identify a major QTL qa1B for Fa* on chromosome 1B, which accounts for 25.64% of the phenotypic variation. 4.4 Genome-wide association study for Fb* The yellowness index (Fb*) of flour was mainly influenced by the quantity of carotenoids, luteins, and flavonoids 7 . This study identified 6 loci significantly associated with Fb* on chromosomes 2A, 4A, 4B, 6B, and 5D (Table 4). Johnson et al. 41 conducted GWAS on 243 varieties and advanced breeding lines selected from the past 20 years and identified loci significantly associated with yellowing on chromosomes 4A, 4B, and 7B. Mares and Campbell 44 identified QTLs associated with Fb* mapped on chromosome 7A in two populations of three diploid Australian wheat populations. Schmidt et al. 42 identified two QTLs associated with Fb* on chromosomes 3A ( R 2 =5%) and 4B ( R 2 =12%). Kuchel et al. 45 identified the main QTL for Fb* on chromosome 7B, explaining up to 77% of phenotypic variation. Zhao et al. 43 detected 13 QTLs for Fb* on chromosomes 1A, 4A, 6A, 1B, 5B, 7B, 2D, 4D, 5D, and 6D. Parker et al. 46 reported two QTLs on chromosomes 3A and 7A, explaining 60% and 13% of Fb* total phenotypic variation, respectively. Zhang et al. 39 detected the main QTL of Fb* on chromosome 7A, accounting for 12.1% to 37.6% of phenotypic variation in five environments. Zhang et al. 36 used 240 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) obtained by crossing the Chinese wheat variety PH82-2 with Neixiang 188 to map the QTL of Fb* on chromosomes 7A and 1B. In summary, loci associated with Fb were detected multiple times on chromosomes 1B, 3A, 7A, and 7B; however, they were not identified in our study. This discrepancy may be due to the different SNP chip and associated panel utilized in this research compared to previous studies. The loci identified in this study on chromosomes 2A and 6B have not been reported and may be new genetic loci related to Fb*. 4.5 Genome-wide association study for flour whiteness This study identified three loci significantly and stably associated with flour whiteness on chromosomes 2A, 4A, and 5D (Table 4). Among these, the locus on chromosome 5D ( 5D_6525346 ) was consistently detected in all environments, with the highest phenotype interpretation rate of 16.66%. In line with previous research, Ji et al. 2 found a significant SNP BS0000020_51 associated with flour whiteness in multiple environments, with the highest phenotypic variation explanatory rate of 15.95%. Notably, this locus was only 3 Mb away from the SNP ( 5D_6525346 ) identified in this study. Notably, SNP marker 5D_6525346 was detected to be significantly associated with flour FL*, Fb*, and whiteness (Table 4). Previous studies have also detected QTLs associated with flour color near this marker, indicating that there might be important genes affecting flour color at this locus. The whiteness of flour was also affected by the grinding characteristics. However, the grinding characteristics are influenced by particle hardness, which in turn affects the whiteness and color of flour 2 . Pin A and Pin B were genes related to grain hardness, and any deletion or mutation in a gene can lead to hardness; Pinb-D1 has multiple types of mutations4 7-51 . Tsilo et al. 21 found a QTL associated with Fb* and FL* on the chromosome 5D, which was consistent with the hardness (Ha) site reported by Matter et al. 20 on the 5DS. Zhai et al. 22 identified a distance of 2.1 cM between QTL QFL.caas-5D-1 and the Pin-b gene. The SNP marker BS0000020_51 identified by Ji et al. 2 on the 5D chromosome was significantly associated with flour whiteness, FL*, and Fb*. Compared with the results of Zhai et al. 22 , it was inferred that this SNP marker may also control flour color through grain hardness. This study screened the marker 5D_6525346 for color association analysis, with a distance of 3.5 Mb from the Pinb-D1 (chromosome 5D, 3,031,551-3,032,419) gene, indicating that Pinb-D1 might also affect flour color, which was consistent with the research results of Zhai et al. 52 . 4.6 Development of KASP markers SNPs are currently the most widely used molecular markers because they are ubiquitous in a given genome and have lower costs compared to other marker technologies 53 . KASP uses endpoint fluorescence detection to distinguish labeled alleles, making it an advanced SNP genotyping technique 54 . If multiple SNPs are identified within the same LD interval, theoretically only one SNP needs to be developed as a KASP marker. However, considering that some SNPs may be located in regions where designing good primers is not possible, or the genotyping of some primers may not be optimal, or the phenotype difference is not significant even though the genotyping might be clear. Therefore, multiple SNPs can be selected for KASP transformation simultaneously, and ultimately, the KASP marker with good genotyping and a significant phenotype difference can be chosen for breeding. This study developed two KASP markers from significant and stable SNPs associated with Fa* identified by GWAS (Figure 3). Among them, the KASP marker transformed from 1B_473486955 was genotyping distinct, and notable phenotypic differences were observed among different haplotypes, which can be utilized for marker-assisted selection breeding. 4.7 Identification of Candidate Genes Previous studies have reported that the color of flour mainly depends on the accumulation of pigment substances such as yellow pigments and carotenoids in flour, as well as the oxidative degradation of pigment substances by some other peroxidase enzymes (polyphenol oxidase, peroxidase, lipoxygenase, etc.) 18 . The yellow pigment content in wheat flour is influenced by the activity of lipoxygenase (LOX), which catalyzes the oxidation of carotenoids, resulting in white wheat flour 55 . The primary gene responsible for LOX activity in wheat was located at the TaLox-B1 locus on chromosome 4BS 56 . Complementary dominant functional markers, LOX16 and LOX18 , have been developed by Geng et al. 57 based on this locus and have been extensively used to detect LOX activity in wheat germplasm resources 58 . This research identified the candidate gene Lipoxygenase LOX2.1, associated with whiteness, on the 5D chromosome through GWAS (Figure 4; Table S7). This gene may represent a novel gene that influences wheat LOX activity, warranting further investigation.In addition, TraesCS5D02G013100 encodes the plasma membrane H+-ATPase (LHA1), which is the primary pump responsible for establishing the plant cell membrane potential. This enzyme not only governs fundamental plant cell functions but also plays a role in responding to diverse environmental stimuli and signaling events 59 . TraesCS5D02G014300.1 encodes a plant cytochrome P450, which plays a crucial role in many biosynthetic pathways, particularly those involving the production of multiple secondary metabolites 60 . TraesCS1B02G269100.1 encodes glutathione transferase, which is an ancient, multi-member, and diverse enzyme class. Plant glutathione transferase has multiple effects on plant development, endogenous metabolism, stress tolerance, and exogenous detoxification 61 . TraesCS1B02G269500.1 encodes isopentenyl diphosphate delta isomerase. Plant hormones (such as abscisic acid, gibberellin, and cytokinin), plant alcohols, carotenoids, and monoterpenes are obtained through the plastid non-methylhydroxyvaleric acid pathway 62 . Isopentenyl diphosphate serves as a common precursor for all isoprenoids in this pathway 63 . TraesCS6B02G034100.1 encodes the DExH box ATP-dependent RNA helicase DExH12 (BRR2a). In Arabidopsis, a missense mutation in BRR2a leads to splicing defects in FLC (Flowering Locus C), resulting in reduced FLC transcript levels and premature flowering 64 . The function of TraesCS4A02G307200 remains unknown based on the available database information. Further investigation is necessary to understand the roles of these genes in flour coloration. Conclusion The coefficient of variation of flour color traits ranged from 0.62% to 22.23%, and the generalized heritability ranged from 0.56 to 0.83. They all follow an approximately normal distribution. There were highly significant correlations between flour color traits. GWAS identified 20 SNP markers significantly and stably associated with flour color traits, spread across 16 loci, including 1 for FL*, 6 for Fa*, 6 for Fb*, and 3 for whiteness. Two KASP markers were successfully developed for Fa*. Seven candidate genes that may influence flour color were identified. This study provides valuable information on genes or genetic loci related to flour color and also offers KASP markers for marker-assisted selection to enhance wheat flour color quality in China. Declarations Authors’ contributions: W.L. and W.S. conceived and planned the research; P.L.; Z.X.; L.Y.; D.K.; Y.N.; H.X. and X.H. conducted the research; Y.T. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Funding: This work was funded by the Key Industrial Innovation Technology Projects in Southern Xinjiang of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (2022DB013), Agricultural Technology Public Relations Project of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (2023AA201), the Science and Technology Innovation Engineering Technology Cooperation Project of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (2024BA001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31560391), the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Base Construction Project of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (2022CA006), and the International Science and Technology Cooperation Program Project of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (2019BC003). Availability of data and materials : The data presented in the study are deposited in Figshare DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.26360368 Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest. References Parker GD, Langridge P. Development of a STS marker linked to a major locus controlling flour color in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). Mol. Breed. 2000 , 6 , 169-174. Ji, M.; Fang, W.; Li, W.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, Y.; Wang, W.; Chen, G.; Tian, J.; Deng, Z. Genome wide association study of the whiteness and colour related traits of flour and dough sheets in common wheat. Sci. Rep . 2021 , 11 , 8790. He, X.; He, Z.; Ma, W.; Appels, R.; Xia, C. Allelic variants of phytoene synthase 1 ( Psy1 ) genes in Chinese and CIMMYT wheat cultivars and development of functional markers for flour colour. Mol. Breed. 2009 , 23 , 553-563. Baik, B.K.; Czuchajowska, Z.; Pomeranz, Y. Discoloration of dough for oriental noodles. Cereal Chem. 1995 , 72 , 198-205. Borrelli, G.M.; Troeeoli, A.; Fonzo, N.D.; Fares, C. Durum wheat lipoxygenase activity and other quality parameters that affect pasta color. Cereal Chem. 1999 , 76 , 335-340. Borrelli, G.M.; Deleonardis, A.M.; Platani, C.; Troccoli, A. Distribution along durum wheat kernel of the components involved in semolina color. J. Cereal Sci . 2008 , 48 , 494-502. Miskelly, D.M. Flour components affecting paste and noodle colour. J. Sci. Food Agr. 1984 , 35 , 463-471. Dong, Z.; Feng, B.; Liang, H.; Rong, C.; Zhang, K.; Cao, X; Qin, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, T.; Wang, D. Grain-specific reduction in lipoxygenase activity improves flour color quality and seed longevity in common wheat. Mol. Breed. 2015 , 35 , 150. Zhai, S.; Li, G.; Sun, Y.; Song, J.; Li, J.; Song, G.; Li, Yu.; Ling, H.; He, Z.; Xia, X. Genetic analysis of phytoene synthase 1 ( Psy1 ) gene function and regulation in common wheat. BMC Plant Biol . 2016 , 16 , 228. Mayer, A.M.; Harel, E. Polyphenol oxidases in plants. Phytochemistry 1979 , 18 , 193-215. Morris, C.F.; JeVers, H.C.; Engle, D.A. Effect of processing, formula and measurement variables on alkaline noodle color-toward an optimized laboratory system. Cereal Chem. 2000 , 77 , 77-85. Fraignier, M.P.; Michaux-Ferriere, N.; Kobrehel, K. Distribution of peroxidases in durum wheat ( Triticum durum ) . Cereal Chem. 2000 , 77 , 11-17. Kobrehel, K.; Laignelet, B.; Feillet, P. Study of some factors of macaroni brownness. Cereal Chem. 1974 , 51 , 675-683. Hemalatha, M.S.; Manu, B.T.; Bhagwat, S.G.; Leelavathi, K.; Rao, U.J.S.P. Protein characteristics and peroxidase activities of different Indian wheat varieties and their relationship to chapati-making quality. Eur. Food Res. Technol . 2007 , 225 , 463-471. Kruger, J.E.; Hatcher, D.W.; Depauw, R. A whole seed assay for polyphenol oxidase in Canadian prairie spring wheats and its usefulness as a measure of noodle darkening. Cereal Chem. 1994 , 71 , 324-326. Kruger, J.E.; Matsuo, R.R.; Preston, K. A comparison of methods for the prediction of Cantonese noodle colour. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 1992 , 72 , 1021-1029. Kruger, J.E.; Reed, G. Enzymes and colour. St. Paul, MN: AACC International, 1988 , 441-487. Roncallo, P.F.; Cervigni, G.L.; Jensen, C.; Miranda, R.; Carrera, A.D.; Helguera, M. H.; Echenique, V. QTL analysis of main and epistatic effects for flour color traits in durum wheat. Euphytica 2012 , 185 , 77-92. Zhang, X.; Tian, J.C. The color advantage of Chinese wheat with high whiteness and analysis of factors affecting color formation. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 2008 , 41 , 347-353. Mattern, P.J.; Morris, R.; Schmidt, J.W.; Johnson, V.A. Location of genes for kernel properties in the wheat variety ‘Cheyenne’ using chromosome substitution lines. Columbia, 1973 , 703-708. Tsilo, T.J.; Hareland, G.A.; Chao, S.; Anderson, J.A. Genetic mapping and QTL analysis of flour color and milling yield related traits using recombinant inbred lines in hard red spring wheat. Crop Sci. 2011 , 51 , 237-246. Zhai, S.; He, Z.; Wen W.; Jin, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xia, X. Genome-wide linkage mapping of flour color-related traits and polyphenol oxidase activity in common wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2015 , 129 , 377-394. Pritchard, J.K.; Stephens, M.; Rosenberg, N.A.; Donnelly, P. Association mapping in structured populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000 , 67 , 170-181. Bradbury, P.V.J.; Zhang, Z.; Kroon, D.V.E.; Casstevens, T.M.; Ramdoss, Y.; Buckler, E.S. TASSEL: Software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 2007 , 23 , 2633-2635. Tian, Y., Liu, P., Kong, D., Nie, Y., Xu, H., Han, X., Sang, W., Li, W. Genome-wide association analysis and KASP markers development for protein quality traits in winter wheat. BMC Plant Biology 2025 , 25, 1-17. Sheoran, S.; Jaiswal, S.; Kumar, D.; Raghav, N.; Sharma, R.; Pawar, S.; Paul, S.; Iquebal, M.A.; Jaiswar, A.; Sharma, P.; et al. Uncovering Genomic Regions Associated With 36 Agro-Morphological Traits in Indian Spring Wheat Using GWAS. Front. Plant Sci. 2019 , 10 , 527. Ghimire, B.; Mergoum, M.; Martinez-Espinoza, A.D.; Sapkota, S.; Pradhan, S.; Babar, M.a.; Bai, G.; Dong, Y.; Buck, J.W. Genetics of Fusarium head blight resistance in soft red winter wheat using a genome-wide association study. Plant Genome 2022 , 15 , e20222. Santos, J.V.M.D.; Ferreira, E.G.C.; Passianotto, A.L.L.; Brumer, B.B.; Santos, A.B.D.; Soares, R.M.; Torkamaneh, D.; Arias, C.A.A.; Belzile, F.; Abdelnoor, R.V.; et al. Association mapping of a locus that confers southern stem canker resistance in soybean and SNP marker development. BMC Genomics. 2019 , 20 , 798. Pingault, L.; Choulet, F.; Alberti, A.; Glover, N.; Wincker, P.; Feuillet, C.; Paux, E. Deep transcriptome sequencing provides new insights into the structural and functional organization of the wheat genome. Genome Biol. 2015 , 16 , 29. Henderson, C.R. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 1975 , 31 , 423-447. Bates, D.; Mäechler, M.; Bolker, B.M.; Walker, S.; Christensen, R.H.B.; Singmann, H.; Scheipl, F.; Green, P.; Krivistky, P.N.; Tanaka, E.; et al. Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using “Eigen” and S4. J. Stat. Softw. 2015 , 67 . Marcotuli, I.; Houston, K.; Schwerdt, J.G.; Waugh, R.; Fincher, G.B.; Burton, R.A.; Blanco, A.; Gadaleta, A. Genetic diversity and genome wide association study of β-glucan content in tetraploid wheat grains. PLoS One 2016 , 11 , e0152590. Turner, S.D. qqman: An R package for visualizing GWAS results using Q-Q and Manhattan plots. BioRxiv 2014 , 005165. Chen, C.; Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Feng, J.; Chen, H.; He, Y.; et al. TB tools-II: A “one for all, all for one” bioinformatics platform for biological big-data mining. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2023 , 16 , 1733-1742. Wu, P.P.; Song, S.; Zhang, F.Y.; Chen F.; Cui, D.Q. The allelic variation of lipoxygenase genes in bread wheat cultivars from the Yellow and Huai Wheat Areas of China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 2015 , 48 , 207-214 (In Chinese). Zhang, Y.L.; Wu, Y.P.; Xiao, Y.G.; He, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, X.; Ma, C. QTL mapping for flour and noodle colour components and yellow pigment content in common wheat. Euphytica 2009a , 165 , 435-444. Zhang, K.P.; Chen, G.F.; Zhao, L.; Liu, B.; Xu, X.B.; Tian, J.C. Molecular genetic analysis of flour color using a doubled haploid population in bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 2009b , 165 , 471-484. Chen, B.R.; Wang, C.Y.; Wang, P.; Zhu, Z.X.; Xu, N.; Shi, G.S.; Yu, M.; Wang, N.; Li, H.J.; Hou, J.M.; et al. Genome-wide association study for starch content and constitution in sorghum ( sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). J. Integr. Agric 2019 , 18 , 2446-2456. Zhang, L.P.; Yan, J.; Xia, X.C.; He, Z.H.; Sutherland, M.W. QTL mapping for kernel yellow pigment content in common wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica 2006 , 32 , 41-44. Martin, J.M.; Frohberg, R.C.; Morris, C.F.; Talbert, L.E.; Giroux, M.J. Milling and bread baking traits associated with puroindoline sequence type in hard red spring wheat. Crop Sci. 2001 , 41 , 228-234. Johnson, M.; Kumar, A.; Oladzad-Abbasabadi, A.; Salsman, E.; Aoun, M.; Manthey, F.A.; Elias, E.M. Association mapping for 24 traits related to protein content, gluten strength, color, cooking, and milling quality using balanced and unbalanced data in durum wheat [ Triticum turgidum L. var. durum (Desf).]. Front. Genet . 2019 , 10 , 717. Schmidt, A.L.; Liu, C.; Matin, D.; Kelly, A.; Mclntyre, L. Molecular markers for selected quality traits in australian hexaploid bread wheat. Cirql Pty Ltd, 2004 . Zhao, Y.; Sun, H.Y.; Wang, Y.Y.; Pu, Y.Y. QTL mapping for the color, carotenoids and polyphenol oxidase activity of flour in recombinant inbred lines of wheat. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2013 , 7 , 328-337. Mares, D.J.; Campbell, A.W. Mapping components of flour and noodle colour in Australian wheat. Aust. J. Agr. Resour. Ec. 2001 , 52 , 1297-1309. Kuchel, H.; Langridge, P.; Mosionek, L.; Williams, K. Jefferies, S.P. The genetic control of milling yield, dough rheology, and baking quality of wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006 , 112 , 1487-1495. Parker, G.D.; Chalmers, K.J.; Rathjen, A.J.; Langridge, P. Mapping loci associated with flour colour in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 1998 , 97 , 238-245. Sourdille, P.; Perretant, M.R.; Charmet, G.; Leroy, P.; Gautier, M.F.; Joudrier, P.; Nelson, J.C.; Sorrells, M.E.; Bernard, M. Linkage between RFLP markers and genes affecting kernel hardness in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1996 , 93 , 580-586. Giroux, M.; Morris, C.F. A glycine to serine change in puroindoline b is associated with wheat grain hardness and low levels of starch-surface friabilin. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1997 , 95 , 857-864. Morris, C.F.; Lillemo, M.; Simeone, M.C.; Giroux, M.J.; Babb, S.L. Prevalence of puroindoline grain hardness genotypes among historically significant north American spring and winter wheats. Crop Sci. 2001 , 41 , 218-228. Xia, L.; Chen, F.; He, Z.; Chen, X.; Morris, C.F. Occurrence of puroindoline alleles in Chinese winter wheats. Cereal Chem. 2005 , 82 , 38-43. Chen, F.; He, Z.H.; Xia, X.C.; Zhang, X.Y.; Lillemo, M.; Morris, C.F. Molecular and biochemical characterization of puroindoline a and b alleles in Chinese landraces and historical cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006 , 112 , 400-409. Zhai, S.; Liu, J.; Xu, D.; Wen, W.; Yan, J.; Zhang, P.; Wan, Y.; Cao, S.; Hao, Y.; Xia, X.; et al. A Genome-wide association study reveals a rich genetic architecture of flour color-related traits in bread wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2018 , 9 , 1136. Cheng, A.; Chai, H.H.; Ho, W.K.; Bamba, A.S.A.; Feldman, A.; Kendabie, P.; Halim, R.A.; Tanzi, A.; Mayes, S.; Massawe, F. Molecular marker technology for genetic improvement of underutilised crops. Cham: Springer, 2017 . He, C.; Holme, J.; Anthony, J. SNP genotyping: the KASP assay. New York: Humana Press, 2014 , 1145 , 75-86. Leenhardt, F.; Lyan, B.; Rock, E.; Boussard, A.; Potus, J.; Chanliaud, E.; Remesy, C. Genetic variability of carotenoid concentration, and lipoxygenase and peroxidase activities among cultivated wheat species and bread wheat varieties. Eur. J. Agron. 2006 , 25 , 170-176. Geng, H.; Zhang, Y.; He, Z.; Zhang, L.; Appels, R.; Qu, Y.; Xia, X. Molecular markers for tracking variation in lipoxygenase activity in wheat breeding. Mol Breed. 2011 , 28 , 117-126. Geng, H.W.; Xia, X.C.; Zhang, L.P.; Qu, Y.; He, Z. Development of functional markers for a lipoxygenase gene TaLox-B1 on chromosome 4BS in common wheat. Crop Sci. 2012 , 52 , 568-576. Pshenichnikova, T.A.; Permyakov, A.V. Effects of limited introgressions from Triticum timopheevii tausch. into the genome of bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) on physiological and biochemical traits under normal watering and drought. Russ. J. Genet. 2016 , 6 , 553-559. Ferrol, N.; Pozo, M.J.; Antelo, M.; Azcón-Aguilar, C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis regulates plasma membrane H+-ATPase gene expression in tomato plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2002 , 53 , 1683-1687. Xiang, W.; Wang, X.; Ren, T. Expression of a wheat cytochrome p450 monooxygenase cDNA in yeast catalyzes the metabolism of sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2006 , 85 , 1-6. Nianiou-Obeidat, I.; Madesis, P.; Kissoudis, C.; Voulgari, G.; Chronopoulou, E.; Tsaftaris, A.; Labrou, N.E. Plant glutathione transferase-mediated stress tolerance: functions and biotechnological applications. Plant Cell Rep. 2017 , 36 , 791-805. Lichtenthaler, H.K. The 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1999 , 50 , 47-65. Nakamura, A.; Shimada, H.; Masuda, T.; Ohta, H.; Takamiuya, K. Two distinct isopentenyl diphosphate isomerases in cytosol and plastid are differentially induced by environmental stresses in tobacco. FEBS Lett. 2001 , 506 , 61-64. Mahrez W, Shin J, Muñoz-Viana R, Figueiredo, D.D.; Trejo-Arellano, M.S.; Exner, V.; Siretskiy, A.; Gruissem, W.; Köhler, C.; Henning, L. BRR2a affects flowering time via FLC splicing. PLoS Genet. 2016 , 12 , e1005924. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files supplement5.6.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 12 Nov, 2025 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 01 Aug, 2025 Reviews received at journal 01 Aug, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 27 Jul, 2025 Reviews received at journal 17 Jun, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 29 May, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 27 May, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 27 May, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 27 May, 2025 Editor invited by journal 23 May, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 22 May, 2025 First submitted to journal 08 May, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6620467","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":463245121,"identity":"0372d4bf-c6d3-4001-a852-25e2cdcb9ad8","order_by":0,"name":"Yousheng Tian","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Xinjiang Academy of Agriculture and Reclamation Sciences","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yousheng","middleName":"","lastName":"Tian","suffix":""},{"id":463245122,"identity":"78140002-09f1-4cba-a51b-f4f70b920977","order_by":1,"name":"Pengpeng Liu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Xinjiang Academy of Agriculture and Reclamation Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Pengpeng","middleName":"","lastName":"Liu","suffix":""},{"id":463245123,"identity":"2a2afb38-7d6e-45c3-8e34-732efc9435d6","order_by":2,"name":"Xin Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shihezi University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xin","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""},{"id":463245125,"identity":"5560d60a-e409-475b-9ce1-a41a60e32dad","order_by":3,"name":"Yichen Liu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shihezi University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yichen","middleName":"","lastName":"Liu","suffix":""},{"id":463245126,"identity":"f1e8cd86-050d-4178-8013-30559cfe2b4e","order_by":4,"name":"Dezhen Kong","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Xinjiang Academy of Agriculture and Reclamation Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dezhen","middleName":"","lastName":"Kong","suffix":""},{"id":463245127,"identity":"c59167d9-c875-42f2-9af2-54f437b2fe55","order_by":5,"name":"Yingbin Nie","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Xinjiang Academy of Agriculture and Reclamation Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yingbin","middleName":"","lastName":"Nie","suffix":""},{"id":463245129,"identity":"00cd5cc1-e4d1-4689-aad3-14ece0267d87","order_by":6,"name":"Hongjun Xu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Xinjiang Academy of Agriculture and Reclamation Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hongjun","middleName":"","lastName":"Xu","suffix":""},{"id":463245131,"identity":"c118a10c-4b0e-49d4-ba85-fe679d6657c5","order_by":7,"name":"Xinnian Han","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Xinjiang Academy of Agriculture and Reclamation Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xinnian","middleName":"","lastName":"Han","suffix":""},{"id":463245132,"identity":"13a9d11e-b956-4e69-b9e8-1a6fdca0bc88","order_by":8,"name":"Wei Sang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Xinjiang Academy of Agriculture and Reclamation Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Wei","middleName":"","lastName":"Sang","suffix":""},{"id":463245134,"identity":"db420c52-5531-4f40-9b83-9fa977e2e28c","order_by":9,"name":"Weihua Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shihezi University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Weihua","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-05-08 12:08:17","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6620467/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6620467/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-23358-4","type":"published","date":"2025-11-12T15:58:40+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":83603729,"identity":"599f1f21-5707-4d54-b23e-cbe2ca468447","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-29 10:03:30","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":435959,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eFrequency distributions of BLUP values for color traits in 341 wheat materials.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA, Frequency distributions of FL*; B, Frequency distributions of Fa*; C, Frequency distributions of Fb*; D, Frequency distributions of whiteness.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6620467/v1/9b636b90626665d1c0e0bc92.png"},{"id":83603730,"identity":"1807b1a0-f18a-4f77-a004-70fc187c72c1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-29 10:03:30","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2317762,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eManhattan and quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots for color quality traits identified through genome-wide association analysis using BLUP values\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA, B, C, D, Manhattan, and Q-Q plots for FL*, Fa*, Fb*, and whiteness, respectively; A horizontal line represents the significance threshold at which markers were considered associated with a trait (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 1E-4, =4).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6620467/v1/c80d23808069493a5c8bebf0.png"},{"id":83603555,"identity":"5ad415ee-c302-4a89-9db0-5b9a2323eca8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-29 09:55:30","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":306523,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eKompetitive allele-specific PCR (KASP) verification of a significant single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) related to the color quality\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA, C, Scatter plots of KASP markers for Fa*; B, D, the variance of Fa* for accessions with different alleles; Red dots and blue triangles represent the homozygous genotypes, green dots represent heterozygous genotypes, and black squares on the bottom left of the plot indicate the no-template control; *** indicate significant differences at \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.001; * indicates significant differences at \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.05.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6620467/v1/a8a8afce082aa9973cf5ec8a.png"},{"id":83603558,"identity":"219654d8-e807-45d9-a14e-1e397ac7b826","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-29 09:55:30","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":417205,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eExpression of candidate genes in seeds of extreme flour color quality materials at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 days after flowering\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHZT indicates “Hongzhitou”; YPLN indicates “Youpilaina”.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6620467/v1/542a9a2a312cdaff92039705.png"},{"id":96105311,"identity":"90c7c9ab-70b1-46bd-aa89-399c3d2927cf","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 16:11:01","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":4674539,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6620467/v1/524f3b89-88fc-40cb-a400-a0fe5419aee7.pdf"},{"id":83603560,"identity":"4019e859-f7fa-4ed5-b26d-34baaa36a750","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-29 09:55:30","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":340079,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"supplement5.6.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6620467/v1/a599862a3035864eed3a8f73.docx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Genome-wide association study and KASP marker development for flour color in winter wheat","fulltext":[{"header":"1 Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eFlour color is an important characteristic in evaluating flour quality for many final product productions\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, reflecting flour quality and milling accuracy, and serves as a significant indicator for flour grading. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the study of flour color to improve the quality of wheat products and meet the market's development needs\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The color of flour and its products primarily depends on the accumulation of pigment substances, such as yellow pigments and carotenoids, in the flour. Previous studies have shown that phytoene synthase (Psy)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, polyphenol oxidase (Ppo)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, lipoxygenase (Lox)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, and some other peroxidase enzymes in wheat grains affect the color, processing quality, milling quality, storage characteristics, and other quality traits of flour or flour products through the oxidative degradation of pigment substances. The yellowness of flour is mainly influenced by the quantity of carotenoids, lutein, and flavonoids\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The yellow pigment content in wheat flour is affected by Lox activity, which converts oxidative carotenoids to make wheat flour white\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Psy1 is the initial step in catalyzing carotenoid biosynthesis and serves as a crucial regulatory point, strongly correlated with carotenoid accumulation (\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.8)\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e, directly affecting the color of grain endosperm and flour. In the presence of molecular oxygen, Ppo catalyzes the oxidation of phenols to form quinones\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, which can polymerize to create high molecular weight black or brown pigments, thereby affecting the color of wheat products, especially yellow alkaline and white salted noodles\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Peroxidase (POD) is a reductase that can oxidize primary phenolic acids, such as ferulic acid, leading to the formation of chromogenic groups and brown substances\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. High POD activity may cause the flour to darken, subsequently leading to suboptimal noodle color\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The browning index of noodle products is significantly correlated with POD activity (\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.84\u0026ndash;0.97)\u003csup\u003e14\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe color of flour has a significant impact on the quality of the final wheat product. Miskelly\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e found a significant correlation between the color of flour and the yellowing of noodles in China and Japan. Flour with a high yellow pigment content is the preferred choice for producing alkaline noodles in China and Japan. In many Asian countries, noodles are made with specially selected flour to enhance the color of the final product \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Therefore, yellow noodles from Japan and China require high b* value flour \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. However, other end products, such as bread, steamed bread, dry white noodles, and dumplings, require white flour with a very low b* value. Similarly, in the United States and other parts of the world, white flour with extremely low b* values (0) and high L* values (100) is ideal for bread baking \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFlour color is a quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes with high heritability\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Environmental and management measures may also affect the color of flour. Grain protein content, hardness, seed coat color, grain size, and shape may all contribute to changes in flour color\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Previous studies have reported the discovery of QTLs that affect flour color near the hardness sites (\u003cem\u003ePina\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003ePinb\u003c/em\u003e) on chromosome 5DS\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR21\" citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. It is speculated that these SNP markers may also control flour color through grain hardness. At the same milling extraction rate, the flour color of low-protein wheat is whiter than that of high-protein wheat. The a* value of wheat flour with a red seed coat is higher than that of wheat with a white seed coat\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImproving the color of flour is an important breeding goal for wheat. Under conventional breeding methods, the efficiency of selecting this trait is relatively low. Genetic improvement is the most effective method for enhancing the color quality of wheat. GWAS is an effective tool for understanding the genetic loci of quantitative traits and marker-assisted selection (MAS) in wheat. This study identified significant association sites for flour color through GWAS, providing a reference for future MAS breeding of flour color and the cloning of color-related genes.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2 Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1 Plant Materials and Field Trials\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe association panel consists of 341 winter wheat varieties and advanced breeding lines from various wheat regions in China excluding Libellula and Strampellula (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). The validation of KASP markers was conducted using 200 winter wheat materials, referred to as the validation panel in this study. This panel included various wheat varieties and advanced breeding lines from both domestic and international sources (Table S2). Among them, 193 materials were different from those in the association panel, while the other 7 materials were part of the association panel. The genotypes of the 7 materials at the KASP marker development site were known, which was used to confirm the accuracy of KASP marker typing. The validation panel was used to verify the success of developing KASP markers.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe association panel was evaluated at two sites, including the Institutes of Agriculture Sciences in Emin and Qitai, Xinjiang, China, during the years 2019\u0026ndash;2020 and 2020\u0026ndash;2021 (hereafter referred to as 2020EM, 2020QT, 2021EM, and 2021QT, respectively). The validation panel was planted in Shihezi, Xinjiang, China, during the years 2020\u0026ndash;2021 and 2021\u0026ndash;2022. The experiment was conducted using an alpha-lattice design with two replications. Each replication consisted of 18 incomplete blocks, with each block comprising 19 genotypes. Each genotype was grown in a plot measuring 1.8 m in length and 8 rows with 0.25 m spacing between them, each row sowed 40 seeds. Recommended management practices were applied to the trials at their respective locations. Plots were hand-harvested at maturity, and the grain was stored at 4\u0026deg;C. Using the MLU202 Mill (Wuxi, China), the grain was ground and passed through a 0.1-micron sieve. These flour samples were stored in airtight containers.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2 Phenotype test\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe whiteness of the flour was measured using an intelligent whiteness tester (WSB-V, Zhejiang, China). Place the sample into the sample box, compact it with a pressure pad, cover it with the lid, invert the sample box, unscrew the bottom cover, remove the glass plate, and position the sample box on the measurement base for whiteness assessment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe parameters of the colorimeter were measured using the CR-410 colorimeter (Konica Minolta, Japan), which are represented by L*, a*, and b* color spaces. L* represents brightness, where L* = 0 represents black, and L* = 100 represents white, with a total of 100 levels in between. The a* and b* values represent different color spaces. Specifically, a* represents the red-green direction, while b* represents the yellow-blue direction. In this context, +a* signifies a reddish hue, -a* indicates a greenish hue, +b* denotes a yellowish hue, and -b* signifies a bluish hue.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3 Genome-Wide Association Study\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eGenotyping was conducted using wheat GBTS 40K breeding chips. Markers with a minor allele frequency (MAF) below 5% and missing data exceeding 10% were excluded from further analysis. Population structure was assessed using clustering analysis software Structure v2.3.4 based on Bayesian models\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. PCA analysis and LD analysis were performed using TASSEL 5.0\u003csup\u003e24\u003c/sup\u003e. The association panel was divided into two subgroups, with an LD decay distance of 4 Mb, which was detailed in our previous article\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe used the MLM model in TASSEL 5.0\u003csup\u003e24\u003c/sup\u003e for GWAS and utilize the population structure (Q matrix) and kinship matrix (K matrix) as covariates to prevent false positives. According to Sheoran et al.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, when the significance test reached \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001 (-log10(\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e)\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;4), it was determined that the marker was significantly associated with the trait. If multiple SNPs controlling a trait were identified to fall within one LD interval, they were referred to as one locus\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Based on previous research reports, loci associated with multiple phenotypic traits were termed pleiotropic loci, while loci consistently identified in at least two environments were considered stable loci\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.4 Development and Verification of KASP Marker\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSelect SNPs that were significantly and stably identified in various environments for transformation into KASP markers. We utilized the online software Polymarker (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://www.polymarker.info/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.polymarker.info/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e) to design two allele-specific forward primers and one common reverse primer. Standard FAM tags (5' GAAGGTGAGTCATGCT 3') and HEX tags (5' GAAGGTCGAGTCAACGGATT 3') were attached to the 5' ends of the two allele-specific primers, respectively.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccording to the descending thermal cycle protocol described by the manufacturer (LGC Genomics, Beverly, MA, USA), SNP genotyping was performed on an ABI7500 instrument using a 96-well plate. The genotyping outcomes were assessed using ABI7500 software, supplemented by manual assessment based on fluorescence values\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. A \u003cem\u003et\u003c/em\u003e-test was conducted to detect significant differences in phenotypic traits between alleles. The primer pair sequences for PCR amplification are listed in Table S3.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.5 Identification of candidate genes\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn order to identify potential candidate genes related to flour color traits, the IWGSC online database (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://www.wheatgenome.org/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.wheatgenome.org/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e) was used to search for all genes within the stable SNP marker LD region (2 Mb upstream and 2 Mb downstream of SNP flank). Protein function prediction of candidate genes was performed using the UniProt protein database (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.uniprot.org/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.uniprot.org/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e) and the Ensembl plants database (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://plants.ensembl.org/Triticum_aestivum/Gene\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://plants.ensembl.org/Triticum_aestivum/Gene\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e). The transcriptome data from different stages of seed maturation in the publicly available Expression Atlas database (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/Experiments/E-MTAB-4484/Results\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/Experiments/E-MTAB-4484/Results\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e) were used to study the expression characteristics of these genes\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Based on functional annotation, we selected genes that were highly expressed at different stages of grain maturation, as well as genes that overlap with stable SNPs for further analysis. We utilized qRT-PCR to detect the expression levels of candidate genes in 5-day, 10-day, 15-day, 20-day, 25-day, and 30-day seeds after anthesis of extreme flour color materials. The extreme color materials were \"Hongzhitou\" and \"Yupilaina\", and their color traits are detailed in Table S4.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTotal RNA was isolated from two-week-old leaves using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. The concentration of total RNA was measured spectrophotometrically using a NanoDrop instrument (Thermo Scientific NanoDrop 2000C Technologies, Wilmington, USA), and the purity was assessed using the A260/A280 and A260/A230 ratios provided by NanoDrop. Reverse transcription was carried out using a PrimeScriptTM first-strand complementary DNA (cDNA) Synthesis Kit (TaKaRa, Japan).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eqRT-PCR was performed using an iCycler iQTM Multicolor PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). qPCR was performed with cDNA in triplicate on 96-well plates using SYBR\u0026reg; Premix Ex TaqTM II (TaKaRa). Each reaction (20 \u0026micro;L) consisted of 10 \u0026micro;L of SYBR\u0026reg; Premix Ex TaqTM II, 1 \u0026micro;L of diluted cDNA, 0.4 \u0026micro;L of forward and reverse primers, and 8.2 \u0026micro;L of H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO. qPCR cycling conditions were as follows: 95\u0026deg;C for 2 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95\u0026deg;C for 5 seconds, 57\u0026deg;C for 32 seconds. Fluorescence data were collected during the 57\u0026deg;C step. Wheat Actin (Genebank ID: LOC123114174) was used as a reference gene. The gene ID and primer sequences are listed in Table S5.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.6 Statistical analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA multi-environment trial analysis was conducted using R software to perform the analysis of variance (ANOVA).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) value\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e was calculated using the R package lme4\u003csup\u003e31\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBroad-sense heritability (\u003cem\u003eh\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e) was estimated from variance components using the formula: \u003cem\u003eh\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;σ\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003eG\u003c/sub\u003e / (σ\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003eG\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;σ\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003eGE\u003c/sub\u003e/E\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;σ\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003ee\u003c/sub\u003e/rE), where σ\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003eG\u003c/sub\u003e, represents the genetic variance, σ\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003eGE\u003c/sub\u003e represents the genotype \u0026times; environment interaction variance, σ\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003ee\u003c/sub\u003e represents the residual variance, E represents the number of environments, and r represents the number of replicates per line\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePearson\u0026rsquo;s correlation between phenotypic traits was computed using SPSS 22 (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://www.brothersoft.com/ibm-spss-statistics-469577.html\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.brothersoft.com/ibm-spss-statistics-469577.html\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther ANOVA and plots were conducted in SPSS 22 and Origin 8.0, respectively.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eManhattan and Q-Q plots were created using the \"qqman\" package in R software\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGene expression heatmap was performed using TBtools\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3 Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e3.1 Phenotyping\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAnalysis of variance (ANOVA) of the association panel showed that, except for no significant difference in whiteness between environments, there were extremely significant differences in other flour color traits among genotypes, environments, and years. In addition, Fa* and Fb* showed extremely significant differences in genotype and environmental interactions, whiteness showed extremely significant differences in genotype and environmental interactions, and genotype and year interactions (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). The variation ranges of FL*, Fa*, Fb*, and whiteness in different environments were 88.17\u0026ndash;93.36, (-1.76)-(-0.34), 5.74\u0026ndash;11.95, and 68.60\u0026ndash;82.20, respectively. The variation ranges of coefficient variation were 0.62%-0.68%, 19.09%-22.23%, 8.36%-11.88%, and 2.25%-2.44%, respectively. The values of \u003cem\u003eh\u003c/em\u003e\u0026sup2; were 0.56, 0.56, 0.83, and 0.83, respectively (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). The frequency distribution of flour color traits based on BLUP values was approximately normal (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCorrelation analysis was conducted on the color traits of flour based on BLUP values (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Highly significant correlations were observed between FL* and Fa*, Fb*, and whiteness, with correlation coefficients of -0.251, -0.316, and 0.738, respectively. Additionally, highly significant correlations were found between Fa* and Fb*, as well as whiteness, with correlation coefficients of -0.645 and 0.225, respectively. Furthermore, a highly significant negative correlation was identified between Fb* and whiteness, with a correlation coefficient of -0.764.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003ctable id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAnalysis of variance for color quality traits in 341 winter wheat\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSource of variance\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003edf\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSum of squares\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFL*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFa*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFb*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWhiteness\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGenotypes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e340\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.7\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.131\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.59\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEnvironments\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e51.8\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.543\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e66.92\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYears\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e345.5\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.254\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e36.99\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2118.5\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGenotypes\u0026times;Environments\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e339\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.015\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.24\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.2\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGenotypes\u0026times;Years\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e339\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.2\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eResidual\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e332\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.011\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e*** indicate significant differences at \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001; ** indicate significant differences at\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.01.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003ctable id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePhenotypic variations and heritability of color quality traits\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003ccolgroup cols=\"8\"\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTrait\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEnvironment\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMinimum\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMaximum\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMean\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSD\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCV (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eh\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFL\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2020EM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e88.17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e91.60\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e89.74\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.61\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.56\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2020QT\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e88.52\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e91.98\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e90.30\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.58\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.64\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2021EM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e89.19\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e92.70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e90.94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.56\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.62\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2021QT\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e89.36\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e93.16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e91.14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.57\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.62\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFa\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2020EM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.55\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.34\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.87\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.19\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.23\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.56\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2020QT\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.75\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.22\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e21.19\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2021EM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.93\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2021QT\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.76\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.46\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.23\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e21.42\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFb\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2020EM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.35\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.36\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2020QT\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.51\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.95\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.33\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2021EM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.36\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.98\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2021QT\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.74\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.50\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWhiteness\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2020EM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e69.50\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e78.50\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e73.54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.65\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2020QT\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e68.60\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e78.90\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e73.36\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.77\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2021EM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e71.10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e81.20\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e75.95\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.85\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2021QT\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e70.40\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e82.20\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e75.99\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.96\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.58\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2020EM, 2020QT, 2021EM, and 2021QT, the cropping seasons of 2019\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;2020 and 2020\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;2021 in E\u0026rsquo;min (EM) and Qitai (QT) respectively; SD, standard deviation; CV, coefficient of variation; \u003cem\u003eh\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, heritability.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003ctable id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePhenotypic correlations (\u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e) of the flour color traits for the wheat association panel\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTrait\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFL\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFa*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFb*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFa*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.251\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFb*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.316\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.645\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWhiteness\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.738\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.225\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.764\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e** indicates significant differences at \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.01.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e3.2 Genome-wide association study for flour color traits\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBased on BLUP values, GWAS identified 31 marker-trait associations (MTAs) for flour color traits (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e; Table S6), including 2 MTAs for FL*, 16 MTAs for Fa*, 10 MTAs for Fb*, and 3 MTAs for whiteness. These MTAs were distributed on chromosomes 1A, 1B, 2A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 4D, 5A, 5B, 5D, 6A, 6B, 6D, and 7B, explaining 5.52\u0026ndash;19.91% of phenotypic variation (Table S6). Simultaneously, GWAS was performed in each environment, and a total of 20 stable association signals were detected, distributed across 16 loci (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e), including 1 locus for FL* located on chromosome 5D; 6 loci for Fa*, located on chromosomes 1A, 5A, 1B (2), 6B, and 4D; 6 loci for Fb*, located on chromosomes 2A (2), 4A, 4B, 6B, and 5D; 3 loci for whiteness, located on chromosomes 2A, 4A, and 5D. The marker \u003cem\u003e6B_20151350\u003c/em\u003e was significantly and stably associated with both Fa* and Fb*; The marker \u003cem\u003e4A_601242583\u003c/em\u003e was significantly and stably associated with both Fb* and whiteness; The marker \u003cem\u003e5D_6525346\u003c/em\u003e was significantly and stably associated with FL*, Fb*, and whiteness. These markers were considered to be pleiotropic loci (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003ctable id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSignificant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for flour color quality traits were identified in multiple environments\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003ccolgroup cols=\"13\"\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTrait\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEnvironment\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMarker\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"5\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e-value\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"5\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eR\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003cem\u003e(%)\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFL*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE1 E2 E3 E4 E5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e5D_6525346\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.12E-10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.98E-09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.58E-06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.56E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.87E-14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.21\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.27\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.91\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"10\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFa*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE1 E2 E3 E4 E5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e1B_473486955\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.85E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.63E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.67E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.04E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.92E-06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.49\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.91\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.79\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.36\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE3 E5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e1B_503482454\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.02E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.01E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.97\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.92\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e5A_671439068\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.87E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.06E-06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.53\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.46\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e5A_671479200\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.07E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.67E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.22\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE3 E4 E5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e6B_20151350\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.29E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.57E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.93E-06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.86\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.82\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.86\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE1 E4 E5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e1A_236720351\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.50E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.07E-06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.01E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.52\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE4 E5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e1B_474382447\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.19E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.79E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.19\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e4D_238181951\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.55E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.80E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.74\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.58\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE2 E5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e1B_473235903\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.11E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.87E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.82\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE1 E3 E5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e1B_504760661\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.13E-07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.64E-06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.43E-06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.85\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.90\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"6\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFb*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE1 E2 E4 E5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e6B_20151350\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.73E-06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.94E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.14E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.05E-07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.26\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE1 E3 E4 E5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e5D_6525346\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.59E-07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.31E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.51E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.90E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.74\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.62\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE1 E5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e2A_104922253\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.37E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.95E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.96\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.65\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e2A_117110052\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.14E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.07E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.72\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE3 E5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e4A_601242583\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.82E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.00E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.65\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e4B_148210072\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.46E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.67E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.52\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.61\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWhiteness\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE1 E2 E3 E4 E5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e5D_6525346\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.59E-12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.41E-07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.50E-10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.06E-06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.2E-11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e16.66\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.85\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.56\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.57\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE1 E5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e2A_348674245\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.43E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.1E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.43\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE2 E3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e4A_601242583\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.36E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.61E-05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.73\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE1, 2020EM; E2, 2020QT; E3, 2021EM; E4, 2021QT, which represent the cropping seasons in Emin (EM) and Qitai (QT) for the years 2019\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;2020 and 2020\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;2021, respectively; E5, BLUP, the best linear unbiased predictor of protein quality traits in 341 wheat accessions during two cropping seasons across two environments.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e3.3 Development and Validation of KASP Markers\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMaterials were classified based on genotypes of significant and stable SNPs, and \u003cem\u003et\u003c/em\u003e-tests were used to detect the significance of genotype effects on phenotypic traits (Table S7). SNPs with highly significant genotypic effects in the four environments of 2020EM, 2020QT, 2021EM, and 2021QT were selected to develop KASP markers (Table S7). The KASP marker developed for SNP \u003cem\u003e1A_236720351\u003c/em\u003e could effectively group the validation subset based on allele genotype (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eA). In this study, only AA homozygotes and AG heterozygotes were found in the validation subset, and no GG homozygotes were present. The Fa* of AA homozygous genotype was significantly higher (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) than that of AG heterozygous genotype (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eB). The KASP marker developed for SNP \u003cem\u003e1B_473486955\u003c/em\u003e could significantly group the materials of the AA, AG, and GG genotypes in the validation subset (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eC), and the Fa* of the GG homozygous genotype was significantly higher compared to the AA homozygous genotype (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eD).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e3.4 Candidate Genes for flour color traits\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSNPs that were significantly and stably associated with flour color traits, and showed significant differences in phenotype between different haplotypes across four environments (2020EM, 2020QT, 2021EM, and 2021QT; \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001; Table S7) were selected to search for candidate genes. A total of 410 genes were detected within 2 Mb upstream and 2 Mb downstream sequences flanking those SNPs. Among them, genes before and after SNPs, and genes overlapping with SNPs were shown in Table S8, with 17 SNPs located in the intergenic region and 3 SNPs located within genes. GO enrichment analysis showed that these genes were involved in a total of 439 GO terms, classified into 15 biological processes, 2 cellular components, and 10 molecular functions. Most genes were mainly concentrated in metabolic processes and cellular processes of biological processes, cellular anatomical entities and protein-containing complexes of cellular components, and binding and catalytic activities of molecular functions (Figure \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eC). KEGG analysis showed that these genes were mainly enriched in metabolic pathways, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, steroid biosynthesis, photosynthesis, oxidative phosphorylation, ribosome, and other processes (Figure \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eB).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBased on the RNA-seq data from a public expression database and functional annotations of those genes, and also considering genes that overlap with significant SNPs, the present study selected 7 candidate genes for qRT-PCR analysis. The relative quantitative data were transformed by log10, and a heatmap was drawn (Figure \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eA). Six candidate genes were differentially expressed in seeds of flour color extreme materials (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e; Table S9). \u003cem\u003eTraesCS5D02G013100\u003c/em\u003e encodes PMA1, which was differentially expressed in 30-day seeds after anthesis of extreme materials; \u003cem\u003eTraesCS5D02G014300.1\u003c/em\u003e encodes P450, which was differentially expressed in 15-day seeds after anthesis of extreme materials; \u003cem\u003eTraesCS1B02G269500.1\u003c/em\u003e encodes isopentenyl diphosphate delta isomerase, which was differentially expressed in 25-day and 30-day seeds after anthesis of extreme materials; \u003cem\u003eTraesCS6B02G034100.1\u003c/em\u003e encodes the DExH-box ATP-dependent RNA helicase DExH12, which was differentially expressed in 20-day, 25-day, and 30-day seeds after flowering of extreme materials; This study did not annotate the protein function of gene \u003cem\u003eTraesCS4A02G307200\u003c/em\u003e, which was differentially expressed in seeds of extreme materials at 20, 25, and 30 days after flowering; \u003cem\u003eTraesCS1B02G269100.1\u003c/em\u003e encodes glutathione transferase, which was differentially expressed in 25-day and 30-day seeds of materials after flowering (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e; Table S9).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4 Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.1 Analysis of Flour Color Traits\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe whiteness and color-related traits of flour are crucial factors that determine the quality of the final wheat product. Therefore, it is essential to identify the main and stable allele loci for these traits and then transfer these favorable alleles to the commodity variety\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e. In this study, significant differences were observed in the flour color traits among different genotypes, environments, and years, except for whiteness among different environments (Table 1), indicating that flour whiteness was mainly controlled by genotype rather than environmental factors\u003csup\u003e35\u003c/sup\u003e. Flour whiteness and FL* showed high heritability in this study (Table 2), suggesting that these traits were primarily controlled by genetics, making them easier to improve and breed at the genetic level\u003csup\u003e36\u003c/sup\u003e. All color traits exhibited a continuous distribution in the association panel (Figure 1), displaying typical quantitative trait characteristics, indicating that they were controlled by polygenic inheritance, consistent with previous report\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e. Correlation analysis revealed highly significant correlations between flour color traits (Table 3), which align with previous research results \u003csup\u003e2, 22, 36, 37\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.2 Genome-wide association study for FL*\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study consistently identified one locus on chromosome 5D (\u003cem\u003e5D_6525346\u003c/em\u003e) significantly associated with FL*, explaining the highest phenotypic variation rate of 19.91%. In line with the finding of Chen et al.\u003csup\u003e38\u003c/sup\u003e, who pinpointed a significant marker \u003cem\u003ewPt-0853-cfd18\u003c/em\u003e associated with FL* at 5,597,656 bp on chromosome 5D. Previous research has also identified the primary QTL/genes influencing FL* on chromosomes 2A, 3A, 4A, 6A, 7A, 1B, 3B, 4B, 5B, 7B, 2D, 4D, and 5D\u003csup\u003e2,39-43\u003c/sup\u003e. For instance, Schmidt et al.\u003csup\u003e42\u003c/sup\u003e identified a QTL associated with FL* on chromosome 4B (\u003cem\u003eR\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e=5%). Martin et al.\u003csup\u003e40\u003c/sup\u003e reported that QTLs for FL* were located on chromosome arms 3AS, 7AL, 3BL, 4BS, 5BL, 7BL, and 2DS. Zhao et al.\u003csup\u003e43\u003c/sup\u003e detected 13 QTLs for FL* on chromosomes 1A, 6A, 1B, 2B, 3B, 5B, 7B, 2D, and 5D using the recombinant inbred line \u0026apos;Chuan 35050\u0026nbsp;\u0026times;\u0026nbsp;Shannong 483\u0026apos; as the material.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.3 Genome-wide association study for Fa*\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study identified 6 loci significantly and stably associated with Fa* on chromosomes 1A, 5A, 1B, 6B, and 4D (Table 4). Similarly, previous studies identified QTL/genes linked to flour Fa* on chromosomes 1A, 3A, 4A, 6A, 7A, 3B, 5B, 6B, 7B, 4D, 5D, and 7D\u003csup\u003e2,39,41\u003c/sup\u003e. Zhao et al.\u003csup\u003e43\u003c/sup\u003e identified 12 QTL/genes associated with Fa* on chromosomes 3A, 5A, 6A, 1B, 2B, 4B, 6B, 7B, and 5D. Zhang et al.\u003csup\u003e36\u003c/sup\u003e used 240 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from crossing the Chinese wheat variety PH82-2 with Neixiang 188 to map the QTLs of Fa* on chromosome 1A, 4A, 7A, 1B, and 3B, explaining up to 35.9% of the phenotypic variation. Additionally, Zhang et al.\u003csup\u003e37\u003c/sup\u003e employed 168 diploid (DH) lines hybridized with Huapei 39 and Yumai 57 to identify a major QTL \u003cem\u003eqa1B\u003c/em\u003e for Fa* on chromosome 1B, which accounts for 25.64% of the phenotypic variation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.4 Genome-wide association study for Fb*\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe yellowness index (Fb*) of flour was mainly influenced by the quantity of carotenoids, luteins, and flavonoids\u003csup\u003e7\u003c/sup\u003e. This study identified 6 loci significantly associated with Fb* on chromosomes 2A, 4A, 4B, 6B, and 5D (Table 4). Johnson et al.\u003csup\u003e41\u003c/sup\u003e conducted GWAS on 243 varieties and advanced breeding lines selected from the past 20 years and identified loci significantly associated with yellowing on chromosomes 4A, 4B, and 7B. Mares and Campbell\u003csup\u003e44\u003c/sup\u003e identified QTLs associated with Fb* mapped on chromosome 7A in two populations of three diploid Australian wheat populations. Schmidt et al.\u003csup\u003e42\u003c/sup\u003e identified two QTLs associated with Fb* on chromosomes 3A (\u003cem\u003eR\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e=5%) and 4B (\u003cem\u003eR\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e=12%). Kuchel et al.\u003csup\u003e45\u003c/sup\u003e identified the main QTL for Fb* on chromosome 7B, explaining up to 77% of phenotypic variation. Zhao et al. \u003csup\u003e43\u003c/sup\u003e detected 13 QTLs for Fb* on chromosomes 1A, 4A, 6A, 1B, 5B, 7B, 2D, 4D, 5D, and 6D. Parker et al.\u003csup\u003e46\u003c/sup\u003e reported two QTLs on chromosomes 3A and 7A, explaining 60% and 13% of Fb* total phenotypic variation, respectively. Zhang et al.\u003csup\u003e39\u003c/sup\u003e detected the main QTL of Fb* on chromosome 7A, accounting for 12.1% to 37.6% of phenotypic variation in five environments. Zhang et al.\u003csup\u003e36\u003c/sup\u003e used 240 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) obtained by crossing the Chinese wheat variety PH82-2 with Neixiang 188 to map the QTL of Fb* on chromosomes 7A and 1B. In summary, loci associated with Fb were detected multiple times on chromosomes 1B, 3A, 7A, and 7B; however, they were not identified in our study. This discrepancy may be due to the different SNP chip and associated panel utilized in this research compared to previous studies. The loci identified in this study on chromosomes 2A and 6B have not been reported and may be new genetic loci related to Fb*.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.5 Genome-wide association study for flour whiteness\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study identified three loci significantly and stably associated with flour whiteness on chromosomes 2A, 4A, and 5D (Table 4). Among these, the locus on chromosome 5D (\u003cem\u003e5D_6525346\u003c/em\u003e) was consistently detected in all environments, with the highest phenotype interpretation rate of 16.66%. In line with previous research, Ji et al.\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e found a significant SNP \u003cem\u003eBS0000020_51\u003c/em\u003e associated with flour whiteness in multiple environments, with the highest phenotypic variation explanatory rate of 15.95%. Notably, this locus was only 3 Mb away from the SNP (\u003cem\u003e5D_6525346\u003c/em\u003e) identified in this study.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNotably, SNP marker \u003cem\u003e5D_6525346\u003c/em\u003e was detected to be significantly associated with flour FL*, Fb*, and whiteness (Table 4). Previous studies have also detected QTLs associated with flour color near this marker, indicating that there might be important genes affecting flour color at this locus. The whiteness of flour was also affected by the grinding characteristics. However, the grinding characteristics are influenced by particle hardness, which in turn affects the whiteness and color of flour \u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e. \u003cem\u003ePin A\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003ePin B\u003c/em\u003e were genes related to grain hardness, and any deletion or mutation in a gene can lead to hardness; \u003cem\u003ePinb-D1\u003c/em\u003e has multiple types of mutations4\u003csup\u003e7-51\u003c/sup\u003e. Tsilo et al.\u003csup\u003e21\u003c/sup\u003e found a QTL associated with Fb* and FL* on the chromosome 5D, which was consistent with the hardness (Ha) site reported by Matter et al.\u003csup\u003e20\u003c/sup\u003e on the 5DS. Zhai et al.\u003csup\u003e22\u003c/sup\u003e identified a distance of 2.1 cM between QTL \u003cem\u003eQFL.caas-5D-1\u003c/em\u003e and the \u003cem\u003ePin-b\u003c/em\u003e gene. The SNP marker \u003cem\u003eBS0000020_51\u003c/em\u003e identified by Ji et al.\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e on the 5D chromosome was significantly associated with flour whiteness, FL*, and Fb*. Compared with the results of Zhai et al.\u003csup\u003e22\u003c/sup\u003e, it was inferred that this SNP marker may also control flour color through grain hardness. This study screened the marker \u003cem\u003e5D_6525346\u003c/em\u003e for color association analysis, with a distance of 3.5 Mb from the \u003cem\u003ePinb-D1\u003c/em\u003e (chromosome 5D, 3,031,551-3,032,419) gene, indicating that \u003cem\u003ePinb-D1\u003c/em\u003e might also affect flour color, which was consistent with the research results of Zhai et al.\u003csup\u003e52\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.6 Development of KASP markers\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSNPs are currently the most widely used molecular markers because they are ubiquitous in a given genome and have lower costs compared to other marker technologies\u003csup\u003e53\u003c/sup\u003e. KASP uses endpoint fluorescence detection to distinguish labeled alleles, making it an advanced SNP genotyping technique\u003csup\u003e54\u003c/sup\u003e. If multiple SNPs are identified within the same LD interval, theoretically only one SNP needs to be developed as a KASP marker. However, considering that some SNPs may be located in regions where designing good primers is not possible, or the genotyping of some primers may not be optimal, or the phenotype difference is not significant even though the genotyping might be clear. Therefore, multiple SNPs can be selected for KASP transformation simultaneously, and ultimately, the KASP marker with good genotyping and a significant phenotype difference can be chosen for breeding. This study developed two KASP markers from significant and stable SNPs associated with Fa* identified by GWAS (Figure 3). Among them, the KASP marker transformed from \u003cem\u003e1B_473486955\u003c/em\u003e was genotyping distinct, and notable phenotypic differences were observed among different haplotypes, which can be utilized for marker-assisted selection breeding.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4.7\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIdentification of Candidate Genes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrevious studies have reported that the color of flour mainly depends on the accumulation of pigment substances such as yellow pigments and carotenoids in flour, as well as the oxidative degradation of pigment substances by some other peroxidase enzymes (polyphenol oxidase, peroxidase, lipoxygenase, etc.)\u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003e. The yellow pigment content in wheat flour is influenced by the activity of lipoxygenase (LOX), which catalyzes the oxidation of carotenoids, resulting in white wheat flour\u003csup\u003e55\u003c/sup\u003e. The primary gene responsible for LOX activity in wheat was located at the \u003cem\u003eTaLox-B1\u003c/em\u003e locus on chromosome 4BS\u003csup\u003e56\u003c/sup\u003e. Complementary dominant functional markers, \u003cem\u003eLOX16\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eLOX18\u003c/em\u003e, have been developed by Geng et al.\u003csup\u003e57\u003c/sup\u003e based on this locus \u0026nbsp;and have been extensively used to detect LOX activity in wheat germplasm resources\u003csup\u003e58\u003c/sup\u003e. This research identified the candidate gene Lipoxygenase LOX2.1, associated with whiteness, on the 5D chromosome through GWAS (Figure 4; Table S7). This gene may represent a novel gene that influences wheat LOX activity, warranting further investigation.In addition, \u003cem\u003eTraesCS5D02G013100\u003c/em\u003e encodes the plasma membrane H+-ATPase (LHA1), which is the primary pump responsible for establishing the plant cell membrane potential. This enzyme not only governs fundamental plant cell functions but also plays a role in responding to diverse environmental stimuli and signaling events\u003csup\u003e59\u003c/sup\u003e. \u003cem\u003eTraesCS5D02G014300.1\u003c/em\u003e encodes a plant cytochrome P450, which plays a crucial role in many biosynthetic pathways, particularly those involving the production of multiple secondary metabolites\u003csup\u003e60\u003c/sup\u003e. \u003cem\u003eTraesCS1B02G269100.1\u003c/em\u003e encodes glutathione transferase, which is an ancient, multi-member, and diverse enzyme class. Plant glutathione transferase has multiple effects on plant development, endogenous metabolism, stress tolerance, and exogenous detoxification\u003csup\u003e61\u003c/sup\u003e. \u003cem\u003eTraesCS1B02G269500.1\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eencodes isopentenyl diphosphate delta isomerase. Plant hormones (such as abscisic acid, gibberellin, and cytokinin), plant alcohols, carotenoids, and monoterpenes are obtained through the plastid non-methylhydroxyvaleric acid pathway\u003csup\u003e62\u003c/sup\u003e. Isopentenyl diphosphate serves as a common precursor for all isoprenoids in this pathway\u003csup\u003e63\u003c/sup\u003e. \u003cem\u003eTraesCS6B02G034100.1\u003c/em\u003e encodes the DExH box ATP-dependent RNA helicase DExH12 (BRR2a). In Arabidopsis, a missense mutation in BRR2a leads to splicing defects in FLC (Flowering Locus C), resulting in reduced FLC transcript levels and premature flowering\u003csup\u003e64\u003c/sup\u003e. The function of \u003cem\u003eTraesCS4A02G307200\u003c/em\u003e remains unknown based on the available database information. Further investigation is necessary to understand the roles of these genes in flour coloration.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe coefficient of variation of flour color traits ranged from 0.62% to 22.23%, and the generalized heritability ranged from 0.56 to 0.83. They all follow an approximately normal distribution. There were highly significant correlations between flour color traits. GWAS identified 20 SNP markers significantly and stably associated with flour color traits, spread across 16 loci, including 1 for FL*, 6 for Fa*, 6 for Fb*, and 3 for whiteness. Two KASP markers were successfully developed for Fa*. Seven candidate genes that may influence flour color were identified. This study provides valuable information on genes or genetic loci related to flour color and also offers KASP markers for marker-assisted selection to enhance wheat flour color quality in China.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u0026rsquo; contributions:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eW.L. and W.S. conceived and planned the research; P.L.; Z.X.; L.Y.; D.K.; Y.N.; H.X. and X.H. conducted the research; Y.T. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThis work was funded by the Key Industrial Innovation Technology Projects in Southern Xinjiang of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (2022DB013), Agricultural Technology Public Relations Project of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (2023AA201), the Science and Technology Innovation Engineering Technology Cooperation Project of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (2024BA001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31560391), the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Base Construction Project of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (2022CA006), and the International Science and Technology Cooperation Program Project of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (2019BC003).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e:\u003c/strong\u003eThe data presented in the study are deposited in Figshare DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.26360368\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication:\u003c/strong\u003e Not applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe authors declare no conflict of interest.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eParker GD, Langridge P. Development of a STS marker linked to a major locus controlling flour color in wheat (\u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e L.). \u003cem\u003eMol. Breed.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2000\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e6\u003c/em\u003e, 169-174.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eJi, M.; Fang, W.; Li, W.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, Y.; Wang, W.; Chen, G.; Tian, J.; Deng, Z. Genome wide association study of the whiteness and colour related traits of flour and dough sheets in common wheat. \u003cem\u003eSci. Rep\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cstrong\u003e2021\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e11\u003c/em\u003e, 8790.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHe, X.; He, Z.; Ma, W.; Appels, R.; Xia, C. Allelic variants of phytoene synthase 1 (\u003cem\u003ePsy1\u003c/em\u003e) genes in Chinese and CIMMYT wheat cultivars and development of functional markers for flour colour. \u003cem\u003eMol. Breed.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2009\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e23\u003c/em\u003e, 553-563.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBaik, B.K.; Czuchajowska, Z.; Pomeranz, Y. Discoloration of dough for oriental noodles. \u003cem\u003eCereal Chem.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1995\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e72\u003c/em\u003e, 198-205.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBorrelli, G.M.; Troeeoli, A.; Fonzo, N.D.; Fares, C. Durum wheat lipoxygenase activity and other quality parameters that affect pasta color. \u003cem\u003eCereal Chem.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1999\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e76\u003c/em\u003e, 335-340.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBorrelli, G.M.; Deleonardis, A.M.; Platani, C.; Troccoli, A. Distribution along durum wheat kernel of the components involved in semolina color. \u003cem\u003eJ. Cereal Sci\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cstrong\u003e2008\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e48\u003c/em\u003e, 494-502.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMiskelly, D.M. Flour components affecting paste and noodle colour. \u003cem\u003eJ. Sci. Food Agr.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1984\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e35\u003c/em\u003e, 463-471.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDong, Z.; Feng, B.; Liang, H.; Rong, C.; Zhang, K.; Cao, X; Qin, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, T.; Wang, D. Grain-specific reduction in lipoxygenase activity improves flour color quality and seed longevity in common wheat. \u003cem\u003eMol. Breed.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2015\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e35\u003c/em\u003e, 150.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZhai, S.; Li, G.; Sun, Y.; Song, J.; Li, J.; Song, G.; Li, Yu.; Ling, H.; He, Z.; Xia, X. Genetic analysis of phytoene synthase 1 (\u003cem\u003ePsy1\u003c/em\u003e) gene function and regulation in common wheat. \u003cem\u003eBMC Plant Biol\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cstrong\u003e2016\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e16\u003c/em\u003e, 228.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMayer, A.M.; Harel, E. Polyphenol oxidases in plants. \u003cem\u003ePhytochemistry\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1979\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e18\u003c/em\u003e, 193-215.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMorris, C.F.; JeVers, H.C.; Engle, D.A. Effect of processing, formula and measurement variables on alkaline noodle color-toward an optimized laboratory system. \u003cem\u003eCereal Chem.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2000\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e77\u003c/em\u003e, 77-85.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFraignier, M.P.; Michaux-Ferriere, N.; Kobrehel, K. Distribution of peroxidases in durum wheat (\u003cem\u003eTriticum durum\u003c/em\u003e) . \u003cem\u003eCereal Chem.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2000\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e77\u003c/em\u003e, 11-17.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKobrehel, K.; Laignelet, B.; Feillet, P. Study of some factors of macaroni brownness. \u003cem\u003eCereal Chem.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1974\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e51\u003c/em\u003e, 675-683.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHemalatha, M.S.; Manu, B.T.; Bhagwat, S.G.; Leelavathi, K.; Rao, U.J.S.P. Protein characteristics and peroxidase activities of different Indian wheat varieties and their relationship to chapati-making quality. \u003cem\u003eEur. Food Res. Technol\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cstrong\u003e2007\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e225\u003c/em\u003e, 463-471.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKruger, J.E.; Hatcher, D.W.; Depauw, R. A whole seed assay for polyphenol oxidase in Canadian prairie spring wheats and its usefulness as a measure of noodle darkening. \u003cem\u003eCereal Chem.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1994\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003e71\u003c/em\u003e, 324-326.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKruger, J.E.; Matsuo, R.R.; Preston, K. A comparison of methods for the prediction of Cantonese noodle colour. \u003cem\u003eCan. J. Plant. Sci.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1992\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e72\u003c/em\u003e, 1021-1029.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKruger, J.E.; Reed, G. Enzymes and colour. St. Paul, MN: AACC International, \u003cstrong\u003e1988\u003c/strong\u003e, 441-487.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRoncallo, P.F.; Cervigni, G.L.; Jensen, C.; Miranda, R.; Carrera, A.D.; Helguera, M. H.; Echenique, V. QTL analysis of main and epistatic effects for flour color traits in durum wheat. \u003cem\u003eEuphytica\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2012\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e185\u003c/em\u003e, 77-92.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZhang, X.; Tian, J.C. The color advantage of Chinese wheat with high whiteness and analysis of factors affecting color formation. \u003cem\u003eScientia Agricultura Sinica\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2008\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e41\u003c/em\u003e, 347-353.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMattern, P.J.; Morris, R.; Schmidt, J.W.; Johnson, V.A. Location of genes for kernel properties in the wheat variety \u0026lsquo;Cheyenne\u0026rsquo; using chromosome substitution lines. Columbia, \u003cstrong\u003e1973\u003c/strong\u003e, 703-708.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTsilo, T.J.; Hareland, G.A.; Chao, S.; Anderson, J.A. Genetic mapping and QTL analysis of flour color and milling yield related traits using recombinant inbred lines in hard red spring wheat. \u003cem\u003eCrop Sci.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e51\u003c/em\u003e, 237-246.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZhai, S.; He, Z.; Wen W.; Jin, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xia, X. Genome-wide linkage mapping of flour color-related traits and polyphenol oxidase activity in common wheat. \u003cem\u003eTheor. Appl. Genet.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2015\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e129\u003c/em\u003e, 377-394.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePritchard, J.K.; Stephens, M.; Rosenberg, N.A.; Donnelly, P. Association mapping in structured populations. \u003cem\u003eAm. J. Hum. Genet.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2000\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e67\u003c/em\u003e, 170-181.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBradbury, P.V.J.; Zhang, Z.; Kroon, D.V.E.; Casstevens, T.M.; Ramdoss, Y.; Buckler, E.S. TASSEL: Software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. \u003cem\u003eBioinformatics\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2007\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e23\u003c/em\u003e, 2633-2635.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTian, Y., Liu, P., Kong, D., Nie, Y., Xu, H., Han, X., Sang, W., Li, W. Genome-wide association analysis and KASP markers development for protein quality traits in winter wheat. \u003cem\u003eBMC Plant Biology\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2025\u003c/strong\u003e, 25, 1-17.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSheoran, S.; Jaiswal, S.; Kumar, D.; Raghav, N.; Sharma, R.; Pawar, S.; Paul, S.; Iquebal, M.A.; Jaiswar, A.; Sharma, P.; et al. Uncovering Genomic Regions Associated With 36 Agro-Morphological Traits in Indian Spring Wheat Using GWAS. \u003cem\u003eFront. Plant Sci.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2019\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e10\u003c/em\u003e, 527.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGhimire, B.; Mergoum, M.; Martinez-Espinoza, A.D.; Sapkota, S.; Pradhan, S.; Babar, M.a.; Bai, G.; Dong, Y.; Buck, J.W. Genetics of \u003cem\u003eFusarium\u003c/em\u003e head blight resistance in soft red winter wheat using a genome-wide association study. \u003cem\u003ePlant Genome\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2022\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e15\u003c/em\u003e, e20222.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSantos, J.V.M.D.; Ferreira, E.G.C.; Passianotto, A.L.L.; Brumer, B.B.; Santos, A.B.D.; Soares, R.M.; Torkamaneh, D.; Arias, C.A.A.; Belzile, F.; Abdelnoor, R.V.; et al. Association mapping of a locus that confers southern stem canker resistance in soybean and SNP marker development. \u003cem\u003eBMC Genomics.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2019\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e20\u003c/em\u003e, 798.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePingault, L.; Choulet, F.; Alberti, A.; Glover, N.; Wincker, P.; Feuillet, C.; Paux, E. Deep transcriptome sequencing provides new insights into the structural and functional organization of the wheat genome. \u003cem\u003eGenome Biol.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2015\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e16\u003c/em\u003e, 29.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHenderson, C.R. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. \u003cem\u003eBiometrics\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1975\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e31\u003c/em\u003e, 423-447.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBates, D.; M\u0026auml;echler, M.; Bolker, B.M.; Walker, S.; Christensen, R.H.B.; Singmann, H.; Scheipl, F.; Green, P.; Krivistky, P.N.; Tanaka, E.; et al. Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using \u0026ldquo;Eigen\u0026rdquo; and S4. \u003cem\u003eJ. Stat. Softw.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2015\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e67\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMarcotuli, I.; Houston, K.; Schwerdt, J.G.; Waugh, R.; Fincher, G.B.; Burton, R.A.; Blanco, A.; Gadaleta, A. Genetic diversity and genome wide association study of \u0026beta;-glucan content in tetraploid wheat grains. \u003cem\u003ePLoS One\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2016\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e11\u003c/em\u003e, e0152590.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTurner, S.D. qqman: An R package for visualizing GWAS results using Q-Q and Manhattan plots. \u003cem\u003eBioRxiv\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2014\u003c/strong\u003e, 005165.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eChen, C.; Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Feng, J.; Chen, H.; He, Y.; et al. TB tools-II: A \u0026ldquo;one for all, all for one\u0026rdquo; bioinformatics platform for biological big-data mining. \u003cem\u003eMol. Plant Pathol.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2023\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e16\u003c/em\u003e, 1733-1742.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWu, P.P.; Song, S.; Zhang, F.Y.; Chen F.; Cui, D.Q. The allelic variation of lipoxygenase genes in bread wheat cultivars from the Yellow and Huai Wheat Areas of China. \u003cem\u003eScientia Agricultura Sinica\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2015\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e48\u003c/em\u003e, 207-214 (In Chinese).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZhang, Y.L.; Wu, Y.P.; Xiao, Y.G.; He, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, X.; Ma, C. QTL mapping for flour and noodle colour components and yellow pigment content in common wheat. \u003cem\u003eEuphytica\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2009a\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e165\u003c/em\u003e, 435-444.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZhang, K.P.; Chen, G.F.; Zhao, L.; Liu, B.; Xu, X.B.; Tian, J.C. Molecular genetic analysis of flour color using a doubled haploid population in bread wheat (\u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e L.). \u003cem\u003eEuphytica\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2009b\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003e165\u003c/em\u003e, 471-484.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eChen, B.R.; Wang, C.Y.; Wang, P.; Zhu, Z.X.; Xu, N.; Shi, G.S.; Yu, M.; Wang, N.; Li, H.J.; Hou, J.M.; et al. Genome-wide association study for starch content and constitution in sorghum (\u003cem\u003esorghum bicolor\u003c/em\u003e (L.) Moench). \u003cem\u003eJ. Integr. Agric\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2019\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e18\u003c/em\u003e, 2446-2456.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZhang, L.P.; Yan, J.; Xia, X.C.; He, Z.H.; Sutherland, M.W. QTL mapping for kernel yellow pigment content in common wheat. \u003cem\u003eActa Agronomica Sinica\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2006\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e32\u003c/em\u003e, 41-44.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMartin, J.M.; Frohberg, R.C.; Morris, C.F.; Talbert, L.E.; Giroux, M.J. Milling and bread baking traits associated with puroindoline sequence type in hard red spring wheat. \u003cem\u003eCrop Sci.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e41\u003c/em\u003e, 228-234.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eJohnson, M.; Kumar, A.; Oladzad-Abbasabadi, A.; Salsman, E.; Aoun, M.; Manthey, F.A.; Elias, E.M. Association mapping for 24 traits related to protein content, gluten strength, color, cooking, and milling quality using balanced and unbalanced data in durum wheat [\u003cem\u003eTriticum turgidum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. var. durum (Desf).]. \u003cem\u003eFront. Genet\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cstrong\u003e2019\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e10\u003c/em\u003e, 717.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSchmidt, A.L.; Liu, C.; Matin, D.; Kelly, A.; Mclntyre, L. Molecular markers for selected quality traits in australian hexaploid bread wheat. Cirql Pty Ltd, \u003cstrong\u003e2004\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZhao, Y.; Sun, H.Y.; Wang, Y.Y.; Pu, Y.Y. QTL mapping for the color, carotenoids and polyphenol oxidase activity of flour in recombinant inbred lines of wheat. Aust. J. \u003cem\u003eCrop Sci.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2013\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e7\u003c/em\u003e, 328-337.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMares, D.J.; Campbell, A.W. Mapping components of flour and noodle colour in Australian wheat. \u003cem\u003eAust. J. Agr. Resour. Ec.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e52\u003c/em\u003e, 1297-1309.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKuchel, H.; Langridge, P.; Mosionek, L.; Williams, K. Jefferies, S.P. The genetic control of milling yield, dough rheology, and baking quality of wheat. \u003cem\u003eTheor. Appl. Genet.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2006\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e112\u003c/em\u003e, 1487-1495.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eParker, G.D.; Chalmers, K.J.; Rathjen, A.J.; Langridge, P. Mapping loci associated with flour colour in wheat (\u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e L.). \u003cem\u003eTheor. Appl. Genet.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1998\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e97\u003c/em\u003e, 238-245.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSourdille, P.; Perretant, M.R.; Charmet, G.; Leroy, P.; Gautier, M.F.; Joudrier, P.; Nelson, J.C.; Sorrells, M.E.; Bernard, M. Linkage between RFLP markers and genes affecting kernel hardness in wheat. \u003cem\u003eTheor. Appl. Genet.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1996\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e93\u003c/em\u003e, 580-586.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGiroux, M.; Morris, C.F. A glycine to serine change in puroindoline b is associated with wheat grain hardness and low levels of starch-surface friabilin. \u003cem\u003eTheor. Appl. Genet.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1997\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e95\u003c/em\u003e, 857-864.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMorris, C.F.; Lillemo, M.; Simeone, M.C.; Giroux, M.J.; Babb, S.L. Prevalence of puroindoline grain hardness genotypes among historically significant north American spring and winter wheats. \u003cem\u003eCrop Sci.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e41\u003c/em\u003e, 218-228.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eXia, L.; Chen, F.; He, Z.; Chen, X.; Morris, C.F. Occurrence of puroindoline alleles in Chinese winter wheats. \u003cem\u003eCereal Chem.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2005\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e82\u003c/em\u003e, 38-43.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eChen, F.; He, Z.H.; Xia, X.C.; Zhang, X.Y.; Lillemo, M.; Morris, C.F. Molecular and biochemical characterization of puroindoline a and b alleles in Chinese landraces and historical cultivars. \u003cem\u003eTheor. Appl. Genet.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2006\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e112\u003c/em\u003e, 400-409.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZhai, S.; Liu, J.; Xu, D.; Wen, W.; Yan, J.; Zhang, P.; Wan, Y.; Cao, S.; Hao, Y.; Xia, X.; et al. A Genome-wide association study reveals a rich genetic architecture of flour color-related traits in bread wheat. \u003cem\u003eFront. Plant Sci.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2018\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e9\u003c/em\u003e, 1136.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCheng, A.; Chai, H.H.; Ho, W.K.; Bamba, A.S.A.; Feldman, A.; Kendabie, P.; Halim, R.A.; Tanzi, A.; Mayes, S.; Massawe, F. Molecular marker technology for genetic improvement of underutilised crops. Cham: Springer, \u003cstrong\u003e2017\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHe, C.; Holme, J.; Anthony, J. SNP genotyping: the KASP assay. New York: Humana Press, \u003cstrong\u003e2014\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e1145\u003c/em\u003e, 75-86.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLeenhardt, F.; Lyan, B.; Rock, E.; Boussard, A.; Potus, J.; Chanliaud, E.; Remesy, C. Genetic variability of carotenoid concentration, and lipoxygenase and peroxidase activities among cultivated wheat species and bread wheat varieties. \u003cem\u003eEur. J. Agron.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2006\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e25\u003c/em\u003e, 170-176.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGeng, H.; Zhang, Y.; He, Z.; Zhang, L.; Appels, R.; Qu, Y.; Xia, X. Molecular markers for tracking variation in lipoxygenase activity in wheat breeding. \u003cem\u003eMol Breed.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e28\u003c/em\u003e, 117-126.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGeng, H.W.; Xia, X.C.; Zhang, L.P.; Qu, Y.; He, Z. Development of functional markers for a lipoxygenase gene \u003cem\u003eTaLox-B1\u003c/em\u003e on chromosome 4BS in common wheat. \u003cem\u003eCrop Sci.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2012\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e52\u003c/em\u003e, 568-576.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePshenichnikova, T.A.; Permyakov, A.V. Effects of limited introgressions from \u003cem\u003eTriticum timopheevii\u003c/em\u003e tausch. into the genome of bread wheat (\u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e L.) on physiological and biochemical traits under normal watering and drought. \u003cem\u003eRuss. J. Genet.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2016\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e6\u003c/em\u003e, 553-559.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFerrol, N.; Pozo, M.J.; Antelo, M.; Azc\u0026oacute;n-Aguilar, C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis regulates plasma membrane H+-ATPase gene expression in tomato plants. \u003cem\u003eJ. Exp. Bot.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2002\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e53\u003c/em\u003e, 1683-1687.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eXiang, W.; Wang, X.; Ren, T. Expression of a wheat cytochrome p450 monooxygenase cDNA in yeast catalyzes the metabolism of sulfonylurea herbicides. \u003cem\u003ePestic. Biochem. Physiol.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2006\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003e85\u003c/em\u003e, 1-6.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eNianiou-Obeidat, I.; Madesis, P.; Kissoudis, C.; Voulgari, G.; Chronopoulou, E.; Tsaftaris, A.; Labrou, N.E. Plant glutathione transferase-mediated stress tolerance: functions and biotechnological applications. \u003cem\u003ePlant Cell Rep.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2017\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003e36\u003c/em\u003e, 791-805.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLichtenthaler, H.K. The 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants. \u003cem\u003eAnnu. Rev. Plant Biol.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1999\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003e50\u003c/em\u003e, 47-65.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eNakamura, A.; Shimada, H.; Masuda, T.; Ohta, H.; Takamiuya, K. Two distinct isopentenyl diphosphate isomerases in cytosol and plastid are differentially induced by environmental stresses in tobacco. \u003cem\u003eFEBS Lett.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e506\u003c/em\u003e, 61-64.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMahrez W, Shin J, Mu\u0026ntilde;oz-Viana R, Figueiredo, D.D.; Trejo-Arellano, M.S.; Exner, V.; Siretskiy, A.; Gruissem, W.; K\u0026ouml;hler, C.; Henning, L. BRR2a affects flowering time via \u003cem\u003eFLC\u003c/em\u003e splicing. \u003cem\u003ePLoS Genet.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2016\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cem\u003e12\u003c/em\u003e, e1005924.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Wheat, Flour color, GWAS, KASP markers","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6620467/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6620467/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eFlour color influences the quality of end-use products of common wheat (\u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e L.). To analyze the genetic basis of flour color, the flour brightness (FL*), red-green level (Fa*), yellow-blue level (Fb*), and whiteness (W) of 341 winter wheat materials grown during the 2019-2020 years and 2020-2021 years in Emin and Qitai were measured. A genome-wide association study was conducted using a wheat 40K breeding chip with the MLM model. The coefficient of variation and generalized heritability of wheat flour color traits ranged from 0.62% to 22.23% and 0.58 to 0.83, respectively. There were strong correlations across the flour color traits. GWAS identified 20 significant and stable SNP markers distributed across 16 loci, including 1 for FL* located on chromosome 5D; 6 for Fa*, located on chromosomes 1A, 5A, 1B (2), 6B, and 4D; 6 for Fb*, located on chromosomes 2A (2), 4A, 4B, 6B, and 5D; and 3 for W, located on chromosomes 2A, 4A, and 5D. Two KASP markers were developed for Fa*, which exhibited good genotype and significant phenotypic differences among materials with different genotypes. Seven candidate genes that may affect flour color during grain development were screened, including \u003cem\u003eTraesCS5D02G01340.1\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eTraesCS5D02G013100\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eTraesCS5D02G014300.1\u003c/em\u003e on the 5D chromosome may simultaneously influence W, FL*, and Fa*, \u003cem\u003eTraesCS1B02G269100.1\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eTraesCS1B02G269500.1\u003c/em\u003eon the 1B chromosome may impact Fa*, while \u003cem\u003eTraesCS4A02G307200\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eTraesCS6B02G034100.1\u003c/em\u003eon the 4A and 6B chromosomes may affect Fb*.The results provide useful information to enhance the color quality of wheat flour in wheat.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Genome-wide association study and KASP marker development for flour color in winter wheat","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-05-29 09:55:25","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6620467/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2025-08-01T15:25:32+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-08-01T09:41:37+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"338714177388883649550593223644702102811","date":"2025-07-27T15:18:13+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-06-17T16:39:29+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"88951884650463158850414732877806547139","date":"2025-05-29T13:19:54+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"309021751640539350368403886421442035634","date":"2025-05-27T19:29:35+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-05-27T10:16:28+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-05-27T10:10:38+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2025-05-23T19:41:07+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-05-22T11:28:14+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2025-05-08T11:56:45+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"1d7b4bfd-8187-44db-a5cd-54a5ac05b24a","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 29th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":49190150,"name":"Biological sciences/Genetics"},{"id":49190152,"name":"Biological sciences/Molecular biology"},{"id":49190154,"name":"Biological sciences/Plant sciences"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-11-17T16:06:56+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-6620467","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-23358-4","journal":{"identity":"scientific-reports","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Scientific Reports"},"publishedOn":"2025-11-12 15:58:40","publishedOnDateReadable":"November 12th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-05-29 09:55:25","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41598-025-23358-4","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-23358-4","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6620467","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6620467","identity":"rs-6620467","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0