Automated collection and categorisation of STM images and STS spectra with and without Machine learning

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background: Atomic resolution scanning probe microscopy, and in particular scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) allows for high spatial resolution imaging, and also spectroscopic analysis of small organic molecules. However, preparation, and characterisation of the probe apex in situ by a human operator is one of the major barriers to high throughput experimentation, and to reproducibility between experiments. Characterisation of the probe apex is usually accomplished via assessment of the imaging quality on the target molecule, and also the characteristics of the scanning tunnelling spectra (STS) on clean metal surfaces. Critically for spectroscopic experiments, assessment of the spatial resolution of the image is not sufficient to ensure a high quality tip for spectroscopic measurement. The ability to automate this process is a key aim in development of high resolution scanning probe materials characterisation. Results: : In this paper, we assess the feasibility of automating the assessment of imaging quality, and spectroscopic tip quality, via both machine learning (ML) and deterministic methods (DM) using a prototypical Tin Phthalocyanine (SnPc) on Au(111) system at 4.7 K. We find that both ML and DM are able to classify images and spectra with high accuracy, with only a small amount of prior surface knowledge. We highlight the practical advantage of DM not requiring large training datasets to implement on new systems and demonstrate a proof-of-principle automated experiment that is able to repeatedly prepare the tip, identify molecules of interest and perform site specific STS experiments using DM, in order to produce large numbers of spectra with different tips suitable for statistical analysis. Conclusion:   Deterministic methods can be easily implemented to classify the imaging and spectroscopic quality of a STM tip for the purposes of high resolution STM and STS on small organic molecules. Via automated classification of the tip state, we demonstrate an automated experiment that can collect high number of spectra on multiple molecules without human intervention. The technique can be easily extended to most metal-adsorbate systems, and is promising for the development of automated, high-throughput, STM characterisation of small adsorbate systems.
Full text 4,628 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Materials

chemistry Medicinal and pharmaceutical chemistry Nano- and molecular-scale electronics Nano-biomaterials and bioscience Nanomagnetics Nanomaterials, thin films and nanointerfaces Nanomedicine Nanometrology and nanomechanics Nano-optics Nanopatterning, self-assembly and nanofabrication Nanostructures for energy and sensing applications Natural products chemistry Organo main group chemistry Other nanotechnology (unclassified) Other organic chemistry (unclassified) Photochemistry and photovoltaics Physical organic chemistry Supramolecular chemistry

Background

Atomic resolution scanning probe microscopy, and in particular scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) allows for high spatial resolution imaging, and also spectroscopic analysis of small organic molecules. However, preparation, and characterisation of the probe apex in situ by a human operator is one of the major barriers to high throughput experimentation, and to reproducibility between experiments. Characterisation of the probe apex is usually accomplished via assessment of the imaging quality on the target molecule, and also the characteristics of the scanning tunnelling spectra (STS) on clean metal surfaces. Critically for spectroscopic experiments, assessment of the spatial resolution of the image is not sufficient to ensure a high quality tip for spectroscopic measurement. The ability to automate this process is a key aim in development of high resolution scanning probe materials characterisation.

Results

In this paper, we assess the feasibility of automating the assessment of imaging quality, and spectroscopic tip quality, via both machine learning (ML) and deterministic methods (DM) using a prototypical Tin Phthalocyanine (SnPc) on Au(111) system at 4.7 K. We find that both ML and DM are able to classify images and spectra with high accuracy, with only a small amount of prior surface knowledge. We highlight the practical advantage of DM not requiring large training datasets to implement on new systems and demonstrate a proof-of-principle automated experiment that is able to repeatedly prepare the tip, identify molecules of interest and perform site specific STS experiments using DM, in order to produce large numbers of spectra with different tips suitable for statistical analysis.

Conclusion

Deterministic methods can be easily implemented to classify the imaging and spectroscopic quality of a STM tip for the purposes of high resolution STM and STS on small organic molecules. Via automated classification of the tip state, we demonstrate an automated experiment that can collect high number of spectra on multiple molecules without human intervention. The technique can be easily extended to most metal-adsorbate systems, and is promising for the development of automated, high-throughput, STM characterisation of small adsorbate systems.

Keywords

STM; STS; Machine Learning; Automated; spectroscopy; | Format: ZIP | Size: 8.6 MB | Download | When a peer-reviewed version of this preprint is available, this information will be updated in the information box above. If no peer-reviewed version is available, please cite this preprint using the following information: Barker, D. S.; Sweetman, A. Beilstein Arch. 2025, 202528. doi:10.3762/bxiv.2025.28.v1 Citation data can be downloaded as file using the "Download" button or used for copy/paste from the text window below. Citation data in RIS format can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Zotero. © 2025 Barker and Sweetman; licensee Beilstein-Institut. This is an open access work licensed under the terms of the Beilstein-Institut Open Access License Agreement (https://www.beilstein-archives.org/xiv/terms), which is identical to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). The reuse of material under this license requires that the author(s), source and license are credited. Third-party material in this work could be subject to other licenses (typically indicated in the credit line), and in this case, users are required to obtain permission from the license holder to reuse the material.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0