The Prevalence and Management of Atrial Fibrillation in New Zealand Māori Detected through an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Programme
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) screening was incorporated into an abdominal aortic aneurysm screening (AAA) programme for New Zealand (NZ) Māori. Methods AF screening was performed as an adjunct to AAA screening of Māori men aged 60-74 and women aged 65-74 registered with primary health care practices in Auckland, NZ. Pre-existing AF was determined through coded diagnoses or medications in the participant’s primary care record. Subsequent audit of the record assessed accuracy of pre-screening coding, medication use and clinical follow-up. Results Among 1955 people screened, the prevalence of AF was 144 (7.4%), of which 46 (2.4% of the cohort) were patients without AF coded in the medical record. More than half of these were revealed to be known AF but that was not coded. Thus, the true prevalence of newly detected AF was 1.1% (n=21). An additional 48 (2.5%) of the cohort had been coded as AF but were not in AF at the time of screening. Among the 19 at-risk screen-detected people with AF, 10 started appropriate anticoagulation within 6 months. Of the 9 who did not commence anticoagulation, five had a subsequent adverse clinical outcome in the follow-up period, including one with ischaemic stroke; two had contraindications to anticoagulants. Among those with previously diagnosed AF, the proportion receiving anticoagulation rose from 57% pre-screening to 83% at 6 months post-screening (p<0.0001); among new AF the proportion rose from 0% to 53% (p<0.01). Conclusions There is a high prevalence of AF in NZ Māori. AF screening is a feasible low-cost adjunct to AAA screening with potential to detect previously undiagnosed AF and reduce ethnic inequities in stroke. It may also prompt better coding and management of previously diagnosed AF. However, effective fail-safe measures are needed to ensure that high-risk newly diagnosed AF is managed according to best practice guidelines.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-07-11T06:40:09.570059+00:00