Clinical effect of minimally invasive surgery for inguinal cryptorchidism

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical effect of minimally invasive surgery for inguinal cryptorchidism. Methods: : The patients were divided into the minimally invasive surgery group (n=100) and the traditional surgery group (n=58). In the minimally invasive surgery group, patients with low inguinal cryptorchidism (n=54) underwent surgery with a transscrotal incision, and patients with high inguinal cryptorchidism (n=46) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Results: : There was no difference in the hospital stay duration or cost between the minimally invasive surgery group and the traditional surgery group (P>0.05). As for the operative time, minimally invasive surgery of low inguinal cryptorchidism was shorter than traditional surgery (P=0.033), while minimally invasive surgery of high inguinal cryptorchidism was comparable to traditional surgery (P=0.658). Additionally, there were no cases of testicular atrophy, testicular retraction, inguinal hernia or hydrocele in either group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of poor wound healing between the two groups ( P >0.05). Although there was no significant difference in the incidence of scrotal hematoma between the two groups ( P >0.05), the incidence in the minimally invasive surgery group was higher than that in the traditional surgery group. Conclusions: : Minimally invasive surgery including a transscrotal incision for low inguinal cryptorchidism and laparoscopic surgery for high inguinal cryptorchidism is as safe and effective as traditional surgery, and could also provide a good cosmetic effect for children.