Clusters, Fingers, and Singles: A Mechanical Landscape of Tumor Invasion

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

A computational model exploring tumor invasion found that hybrid invasion behaviors, including cohesive strands, solitary cells, and small clusters, emerge robustly from simple mechanical rules and are favored across a broad parameter space.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Collective invasion is a key mechanism by which tumors disseminate and metastasize, involving coordinated migration of heterogeneous cell populations. Experimental studies have identified specialized leader and follower cells that work together during this process, but the biophysical rules governing their interaction remain unclear. We present a mechanistic, cell-based computational model using the Cellular Potts framework to investigate how heterotypic adhesion, leader motility, and follower proliferation jointly shape invasion. Leader–follower tumors were simulated across 13,310 parameter sets, and invasion was quantified by invasive and infiltrative areas, finger-like protrusions, solitary defectors, and detached clusters. From these simulations, we identified four distinct invasion phenotypes: non-invasive, bulk collective, single-cell, and multimodal. Multimodal invasion—the coexistence of cohesive strands, solitary cells, and small clusters—emerged as the most prevalent phenotype, particularly under moderate adhesion, high motility, and intermediate proliferation. Proliferation exhibited nonlinear effects: moderate division reinforced cohesive invasion, whereas excessive growth destabilized tumor architecture. Mapping outcomes across the parameter space revealed sharp transitions between invasion modes, underscoring trade-offs between adhesion and motility in shaping invasion complexity. Our results show that hybrid invasion behaviors, previously considered rare, arise robustly from simple mechanical rules and are favored in a broad region of the parameter space. This framework reconciles binary models of invasion with experimental observations of heterogeneity, providing predictive insights into how modulating adhesion, motility, or proliferation can restrict metastatic spread. Author summary When cancer cells leave a primary tumor, they do not just invade as lone cells but also as cohesive fingers and small cell clusters, depending on how strongly cells stick together, how hard some cells pull, and how fast the population grows. We built a simple, physics-based computational model in which a small number of ‘leader’ cells pull on the more proliferative ‘followers.’ By systematically varying three key properties, cell-cell adhesion, leader motility, and follower proliferation, we generated a large simulation of invasion patterns and grouped them into four invasion modes. The resulting phase diagram shows where tumors grow as compact masses (no invasion), or invade as protruding “fingers,” as single cells, or in a mixed multimodal fashion with fingers, clusters, and single cells. Surprisingly, this mixed state was the most common outcome, arising when adhesion is moderate and leader motility is strong. This map provides intuition and practical rules for thinking about how changes in adhesion or motility might reorganize invasion, such as shifting cluster-forming fronts toward more compact, less dissemination-prone configurations.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0