Laparoscopic ureteral injury and repair: case reviews and clinical update
review
OA: closed
public-domain-us
Abstract
Ureteral injuries are known complications of pelvic surgery. The incidence is 0.5% to 3%, and approximately one-third of these cases are not identified or corrected intraoperatively. It is critical to recognize and repair these injuries intraoperatively to decrease morbidity and prevent further complications, such as ureteral stricture, fistula formation, or loss of renal function. Traditionally, laparotomy has been the method of choice for ureteral injuries even when the injury is identified during a laparoscopic procedure. Laparoscopy has been shown to result in decreased infection rate, fewer incisional hernias, shorter hospital stay, and quicker recovery compared with laparotomy. Several articles were reviewed of successful laparoscopic ureteral injury repair, in addition to the 2 cases presented in this article. We conclude that laparoscopic ureteral injury repair is feasible, safe, and effective.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-07-31T06:09:14.520117+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:00.519696+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-07-31T06:42:51.797318+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine