Laparoscopic ureteral injury and repair: case reviews and clinical update

review OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

Ureteral injuries are known complications of pelvic surgery. The incidence is 0.5% to 3%, and approximately one-third of these cases are not identified or corrected intraoperatively. It is critical to recognize and repair these injuries intraoperatively to decrease morbidity and prevent further complications, such as ureteral stricture, fistula formation, or loss of renal function. Traditionally, laparotomy has been the method of choice for ureteral injuries even when the injury is identified during a laparoscopic procedure. Laparoscopy has been shown to result in decreased infection rate, fewer incisional hernias, shorter hospital stay, and quicker recovery compared with laparotomy. Several articles were reviewed of successful laparoscopic ureteral injury repair, in addition to the 2 cases presented in this article. We conclude that laparoscopic ureteral injury repair is feasible, safe, and effective.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

mesh:D004715

MeSH descriptors

Hysterectomy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Ureter Ureter Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Hysterectomy Menorrhagia Menorrhagia Menorrhagia Middle Aged Radiography Ureter Ureter Urinary Catheterization Urologic Surgical Procedures Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:00.519696+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine