Assessing Physician Performance Using Multisource Surveys: Do Biases Exist Due to Gender, Country of Training, Native Language, and Age?
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Abstract Background: With a growing number of foreign-trained physicians joining the United States workforce, there is a need to assess their job performance fairly. The purpose of this study was to explore the fairness of a multisource competency assessment on U.S.- and non-U.S.-trained physicians. Methods: We conducted a non-experimental retrospective analysis on physicians working in the United States (n=258) who participated in a physician assessment and education program. Results: There were no significant differences in performance outcomes at the scale level of teamwork, motivating or discouraging behaviors, technical practice, and patient interactions, nor the item level based on demographic differences. Conclusions: The PULSE 360 is a powerful tool that can be used to evaluate physician performance without bias due demographic differences including: gender, country of physician medical training, physician native language, or age.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0