What students need to understand about AI: Neither chatbots nor cars have a personality

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

The increase of AI tools like chatbots in education is going hand in hand with an ongoing humanization of these tools. In K-12, this increase is aimed at fostering student learning. In this article we argue and warn that such humanization runs the risk of students perceiving AI as a real personality and mistaking it for someone rather than something. To illustrate how AI-tools can be perceived as having a personality, we let an AI-expert rate ChatGPT’s personality. Additionally, we let ChatGPT’s rate its own personality and let a car enthusiast rate their car’s personality. The comparison of these three case-studies showcases that having a personality profile does not mean you have a personality. We conclude that education should provide a basic understanding of what an AI-tool is to enable students to responsibly navigate an AI-driven world.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0