When Networks Mislead Democracy: How Partisan Communication Undermines Collective Decision-Making

When Networks Mislead Democracy: How Partisan Communication Undermines Collective Decision-Making | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article When Networks Mislead Democracy: How Partisan Communication Undermines Collective Decision-Making Hsuan-Wei Lee, Po-Kang Hsiao This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7730487/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Democratic societies increasingly rely on communication networks to aggregate citizen preferences and information, yet these same networks can systematically mislead voters under certain conditions. While democratic theory envisions networks as conduits for collective wisdom, the conditions determining when networks enhance versus undermine collective decision-making remain poorly understood. We introduce an agent-based model that captures two rival forces in partisan networks: honest noise filtering that lifts accuracy and strategic bluffing that embeds bias. Our systematic computational analysis reveals that communication architecture shapes voting accuracy more than any individual-level trait. When candidate quality gaps are moderate, partisan bluffing overpowers honest signals and steers supporters of weaker contenders into collective error. However, positioning independents in central network roles serves as an epistemic circuit breaker, preventing echo chambers from spiraling toward systematic error. This demonstrates that diverse groups can outperform homogeneous high-ability groups, suggesting democratic systems benefit more from cognitive diversity than from concentrations of highly engaged partisans. Counterintuitively, we discover that competitive elections with meaningful quality differences prove most vulnerable to collective delusion. Small numbers of extreme partisans can contaminate entire communities through cascading bias effects that persist across hundreds of communication rounds. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom about information aggregation in democracy by revealing a fundamental tension between beneficial noise filtering and harmful bias amplification. We offer concrete design principles for preserving democratic competence in networked societies, particularly in competitive two-party systems where digital platforms increasingly mediate political communication. Correct Voting Social Networks Political Communication Agent- Based Modeling Democratic Decision-Making Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files msappendixPB.pdf Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7730487","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":534109277,"identity":"1b53b7b7-c978-4c8e-b8fd-4d319be06290","order_by":0,"name":"Hsuan-Wei Lee","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Lehigh University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hsuan-Wei","middleName":"","lastName":"Lee","suffix":""},{"id":534109278,"identity":"c3ee5153-8773-4282-99d8-7656ac496c18","order_by":1,"name":"Po-Kang Hsiao","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Wisconsin–Madison","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Po-Kang","middleName":"","lastName":"Hsiao","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-09-27 21:08:07","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7730487/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7730487/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":94451358,"identity":"42585e3b-85e2-40c2-b283-a031e919d398","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-27 14:40:05","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":2222438,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"mssubmitPB.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7730487/v1/3a276a081a3ab4db232abb1b.pdf"},{"id":94450924,"identity":"5d92e33e-798f-4a97-a798-35467a3787fa","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-27 14:39:42","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":4791,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"fd30d72376fd4066aef24d2b4ff59bb2.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7730487/v1/d874e25b85ea4a1b27bf627e.json"},{"id":94451300,"identity":"4fab5a73-cb49-4fe5-8537-a8319db099e0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-27 14:40:01","extension":"pdf","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1457819,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"msappendixPB.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7730487/v1/f0cfc92a3d009b8e2a347beb.pdf"},{"id":102804536,"identity":"9c9d29ef-5753-4e96-95b6-5a23a2a7fd93","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-16 23:09:18","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1186800,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"mssubmitPB.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7730487/v1_covered_f29dc351-5b28-4fc9-be78-570447402d65.pdf"},{"id":94450626,"identity":"d7b80b47-dbf2-48f6-af28-7a2afe61b2b6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-27 14:39:24","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":1457819,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"msappendixPB.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7730487/v1/d36530ec7eab63c36a16153b.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"When Networks Mislead Democracy: How Partisan Communication Undermines Collective Decision-Making","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Correct Voting, Social Networks, Political Communication, Agent- Based Modeling, Democratic Decision-Making","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7730487/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7730487/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Democratic societies increasingly rely on communication networks to aggregate citizen preferences and information, yet these same networks can systematically mislead voters under certain conditions. While democratic theory envisions networks as conduits for collective wisdom, the conditions determining when networks enhance versus undermine collective decision-making remain poorly understood. We introduce an agent-based model that captures two rival forces in partisan networks: honest noise filtering that lifts accuracy and strategic bluffing that embeds bias. Our systematic computational analysis reveals that communication architecture shapes voting accuracy more than any individual-level trait. When candidate quality gaps are moderate, partisan bluffing overpowers honest signals and steers supporters of weaker contenders into collective error. However, positioning independents in central network roles serves as an epistemic circuit breaker, preventing echo chambers from spiraling toward systematic error. This demonstrates that diverse groups can outperform homogeneous high-ability groups, suggesting democratic systems benefit more from cognitive diversity than from concentrations of highly engaged partisans. Counterintuitively, we discover that competitive elections with meaningful quality differences prove most vulnerable to collective delusion. Small numbers of extreme partisans can contaminate entire communities through cascading bias effects that persist across hundreds of communication rounds. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom about information aggregation in democracy by revealing a fundamental tension between beneficial noise filtering and harmful bias amplification. We offer concrete design principles for preserving democratic competence in networked societies, particularly in competitive two-party systems where digital platforms increasingly mediate political communication.","manuscriptTitle":"When Networks Mislead Democracy: How Partisan Communication Undermines Collective Decision-Making","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-10-27 11:31:10","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7730487/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"a11a2c94-989d-47a3-90d3-aefa15dab0e8","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 27th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-02-16T23:08:53+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-10-27 11:31:10","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7730487","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7730487","identity":"rs-7730487","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}