Machine learning based phenotyping of the response to mindfulness for chronic low back pain

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 3,116 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Millions of people each year suffer from chronic low back pain (cLBP), which adversely affects their physical and mental health. While non-pharmacological interventions such as mindfulness are known to be effective in treating cLBP, not all patients experience the same benefit. Determining who these treatments might work best for is difficult, as there are no reliable predictors of the response to mindfulness for cLBP. The objective of the current study was to apply predictive machine learning to data collected from a completed clinical trial of mindfulness for cLBP to identify phenotypes characterizing those who did and did not respond to the intervention. The analyses here focused on 132 participants in the intervention arm of the clinical trial of mindfulness for cLBP. The Random Forest machine learning technique was used to identify key characteristics of responders (49) and non-responders (83). The top three responder phenotypes were able to identify 26 out of the 49 responders with 92-100% precision. The top three non-responder phenotypes were able to identify 36 out of 83 non-responders, all with 100% precision. Results from this machine learning based phenotyping can guide clinician and patient decision-making to maximize clinical efficiency, patient outcomes, and resource use as well as inform research and development of mindfulness-based treatments for pain. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Clinical Trial NCT01405716 Funding Statement This study was funded by National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke) grant UH3NS135168. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The Worcester Polytechnic Institute IRB waived ethical approval for this work. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability All data produced in the present are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0