Pilot study to assess the feasibility of self-administered, low-dose methoxyflurane for cystoscopic procedures.

OA: closed
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-12 ⓘ

A pilot study of 11 patients undergoing outpatient cystoscopy found that self-administered low-dose methoxyflurane provided adequate analgesia with mild, non-serious adverse events, supporting further randomized trial evaluation.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-12 · read from full text ⓘ

This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of using self-administered, low-dose methoxyflurane as an analgesic for 11 patients undergoing outpatient cystoscopic procedures. The protocol involved a ten-minute administration period followed by a five-minute wait time before the procedure began, with an average total monitoring duration of twenty-three minutes. Patients reported an average pain score of four out of ten, and while four individuals experienced mild to moderate adverse events such as euphoria or dizziness, no serious complications occurred. The authors concluded that these findings provide proof of principle for designing a randomized controlled trial to further assess this anesthetic approach in urology. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

IntroductionMethoxyflurane (MEO F) (Penthrox™) is an inhaled, self-administered, non-opioid analgesic approved by Health Canada for the short-term relief of moderate to severe acute pain associated with trauma or interventional medical procedures. In this pilot study, we evaluated the feasibility of using MEOF as an anesthetic agent in 11 patients undergoing outpatient cystoscopic procedures.MethodsThe average duration of the procedure was 24 (range 20-35) minutes and this included 10 minutes of administration time of the drug and five minutes of wait time before the procedure. The average monitoring time from start to end of the procedure was 23 (range 20-35) minutes and this included 15 minutes of monitoring post-procedure. On a scale of 0-10, patients on average rated the pain 4/10 (standard deviation [SD] 2.6).ResultsGlobal performance was on average 3/4 (SD 1.3) for the patients and 3/4 (SD 1.1) for the operator. Of the 11 patients, four reported adverse events; two experienced euphoria, one experienced dizziness, and one was unable to tolerate the medication. Two patients noted their adverse events to be of moderate intensity, while the other two were of mild intensity. None of the adverse events was deemed serious.ConclusionsOur findings in this pilot study provide proof of principle for the design of a randomized control trial to evaluate MEOF as an anesthetic in an outpatient cystoscopic procedural setting. As more urologic procedures are being performed in an outpatient setting, this may offer significant clinical benefit.
Full text 3,357 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Introduction

Methoxyflurane (MEOF) (PenthroxTM) is an inhaled, self-administered, non-opioid analgesic approved by Health Canada for the short-term relief of moderate to severe acute pain associated with trauma or interventional medical procedures. In this pilot study, we evaluated the feasibility of using MEOF as an anesthetic agent in 11 patients undergoing outpatient cystoscopic procedures.

Methods

The average duration of the procedure was 24 (range 20–35) minutes and this included 10 minutes of administration time of the drug and five minutes of wait time before the procedure. The average monitoring time from start to end of the procedure was 23 (range 20–35) minutes and this included 15 minutes of monitoring post-procedure. On a scale of 0–10, patients on average rated the pain 4/10 (standard deviation [SD] 2.6).

Results

Global performance was on average 3/4 (SD 1.3) for the patients and 3/4 (SD 1.1) for the operator. Of the 11 patients, four reported adverse events; two experienced euphoria, one experienced dizziness, and one was unable to tolerate the medication. Two patients noted their adverse events to be of moderate intensity, while the other two were of mild intensity. None of the adverse events was deemed serious.

Conclusions

Our findings in this pilot study provide proof of principle for the design of a randomized control trial to evaluate MEOF as an anesthetic in an outpatient cystoscopic procedural setting. As more urologic procedures are being performed in an outpatient setting, this may offer significant clinical benefit. Downloads Downloads Published How to Cite Issue Section License You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA: - Post the Article on any Web site - Translate or authorize a translation of the Article - Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so - Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so. The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request. You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article. The CUA also requires you to warrant the following: - That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party; - That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged; - That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and - That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-11-01T09:25:17.647243+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-11-05T06:08:55.941966+00:00