Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging detect subclinical recurrences after capsular dissection of parotid pleomorphic adenomas?
preprint
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This study found that MRI did not detect occult recurrences of parotid pleomorphic adenoma after conservative resection, concluding that clinical follow-up is sufficient and radiological surveillance is not justified.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Recurrence after conservative resection of pleomorphic adenoma is a rare and late phenomenon that poses a difficult management problem. All recurrences at 6 years after capsular dissection were detected clinically (recurrence rate 3.2%). Magnetic resonance imaging failed to detect early occult recurrences after conservative surgery and thus a “single shot” imaging modality for follow up is not recommended. Regular ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging have been used after surgery for early detection of a recurrence. The pickup rate is low so the additional cost and effort of radiological surveillance is not justified. Follow up after parotid surgery for pleomorphic adenoma remains clinical. There may be a benefit in regular surveillance imaging of high risk patients (prior enucleation or resection after recurrence).
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-07-16T07:05:59.256426+00:00