The Feasibility of Half-Dose Contrast-Enhanced Scanning of Brain Tumours at 5.0 T: a preliminary study
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated the Gd-based enhanced effects on brain tumours with half-dose at 5.0 T and with full-dose at 3.0 T. Both quantitative and subjective evaluation parameters suggested that half-dose enhanced scanning at 5.0 T MRI might be feasible to meet the clinical diagnostic requirements. Methods: Twelve subjects diagnosed with brain tumours were included in this study, and scanned after contrast agent injection at 3.0 T (full-dose) and 5.0 T (half-dose) with a 3D T1-weighted gradient echo sequence, respectively. The post-contrast images were compared between 5.0 T and 3.0 T, in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and subjective image quality score with a ten-point Likert scale. Comparing quantitative indices and subjective picture quality ratings with a paired Student's t-test and assessing inter-reader agreement with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: A total of 16 enhanced tumours lesions were detected. The SNR was significantly higher at 5.0 T than 3.0 T in gray matter, white matter and enhanced lesions (p < 0.001). The CNR was also significantly higher at 5.0 T than 3.0 T MRI in gray matter-tumor lesion, white matter-tumor lesion, and gray matter-white matter (p < 0.001). Subjective evaluation showed that the internal structure and outline of the tumor lesions were more clearly displayed with half-does at 5.0 T, and the enhanced effects of the lesions was comparable to that with full-dose at 3.0 T. All subjective scores were good to excellent at both 5.0 T and 3.0 T. Conclusion: 5.0 T half-dose intravenous contrast agents enhanced scanning might be feasible to meet the clinical diagnostic requirements of brain tumours.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0