The 2NS Chromosomal Translocation Enhances Redox Homeostasis and Mitigates Oxidative Stress during Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum Infection in Wheat | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article The 2NS Chromosomal Translocation Enhances Redox Homeostasis and Mitigates Oxidative Stress during Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum Infection in Wheat Md Saiful Islam, Mohammed Mohi-Ud-Din, Dipali Rani Gupta, Md. Motiar Rohman, and 2 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8733903/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 12 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Wheat blast, caused by the hemibiotrophic fungus Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum (MoT), is a destructive disease that poses a severe threat to global wheat production. The 2NS chromosomal translocation, introgressed from Aegilops ventricosa into the Bangladeshi wheat variety BARI Gom 33 (BG33), confers moderate-to-high resistance to MoT under field conditions. Despite its widespread deployment, the molecular mechanisms underlying this 2NS-mediated resistance remain largely unknown. This study aimed to elucidate the physiological and biochemical bases of resistance in BG33, specifically regarding its capacity to counteract infection-induced oxidative stress. Comparative analysis between the resistant variety (BG33) and a susceptible variety (BARI Gom 26, BG26) revealed that BG33 maintained significantly lower accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), including hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), and exhibited reduced lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde, MDA) and lipoxygenase (LOX) activity post-inoculation. BG33 also retained higher photosynthetic pigment integrity (chlorophyll and carotenoids), indicating superior protection against oxidative cellular damage. Crucially, BG33 displayed enhanced constitutive and MoT-induced antioxidant activity; basal levels of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), and proline were 1.3–2.5-fold higher in BG33 than in BG26. Upon MoT infection, BG33 further upregulated enzymatic antioxidants including superoxide dismutase (SOD), CAT, APX, GPX, glutathione reductase, dehydroascorbate reductase, and monodehydroascorbate reductase and proline by 1.2–2.0-fold, establishing a robust state of redox homeostasis that was absent in BG26. These findings establish, for the first time, that the 2NS translocation bolsters MoT resistance by potentiating a multi-tiered antioxidant defense system to mitigate the oxidative burst and preserve cellular function. This study provides a novel mechanistic framework for leveraging antioxidant pathways in the development of more durable and resilient blast-resistant wheat varieties. Biological sciences/Biochemistry Biological sciences/Biotechnology Biological sciences/Microbiology Biological sciences/Plant sciences Reactive oxygen species oxidative stress proline pigment and blast disease Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Background Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is essential for global food security, accounting for approximately 20% of the caloric energy and 25% of dietary proteins consumed by humans worldwide. To meet the projected 60% increase in demand by 2050, wheat yields must rise sustainably amid escalating threats from climate change and emerging pathogens (USDA, 2022 ). Among these threats, wheat blast caused by the hemibiotrophic fungus Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum (MoT) stands out as a devastating disease. First reported in Brazil in 1985, wheat blast has since spread to many South American countries and recently to South Asia (Bangladesh, 2016) and Southern Africa (Zambia, 2020), causing yield losses of up to 100% under conducive conditions (Islam et al., 2016 ; Tembo et al., 2020 ). Its potential expansion into major wheat-producing regions like India and China, driven by climate variability and global trade, underscores the urgency of developing durable resistance strategies (Kamoun et al., 2019 ). Using wheat crop simulation and newly developed wheat blast model, Pequeno et al. (2024) estimated that wheat blast can reduce global wheat production by 69 million tons per year (13% decrease) by mid-century. Genetic resources for wheat breeding and molecular mechanism of wheat-MoT interactions are scarcely available (Islam et al. 2020 ; Bhattacharjee et al. 2025 ). A critical line of defense lies in genetic resistance. The 2NS translocation, a chromosomal segment introgressed from the wild grass Aegilops ventricosa , has been widely deployed in wheat breeding since the 1990s for its broad-spectrum resistance to pests and diseases, including nematodes, rusts, and powdery mildew (Cruz et al., 2016 ; Gao et al., 2021 ). Recent studies suggest that 2NS also confers moderate resistance to wheat blast in field conditions (Cruz and Valent, 2017 ; Islam et al., 2020 ). For instance, the Bangladeshi variety BARI Gom 33 (BG33), harbouring the 2NS segment, exhibits a considerable levels of blast resistance and terminal heat tolerance (Hossain et al., 2019 ; Mohi-Ud-Din et al., 2022 ). Stacking of a newly cloned blast-resistance gene, Rmg8 into the 2NS background is thought to lead a durable blast-resistant wheat variety to combat fearsome wheat blast disease in Asia, Africa and South America (Asuke et al. 2024 ; Islam and Azad 2024 ). However, the molecular mechanisms underpinning 2NS-mediated blast resistance remain unresolved. Notably, while the translocation is known to carry uncharacterized resistance-associated genes (Kolmer et al., 2007 ), its role in modulating host-pathogen interactions at the biochemical level, particularly during oxidative stress has not been explored. Plant defense against pathogens involves a tightly regulated oxidative burst, where reactive oxygen species (ROS) serve as dual-edged swords: they are critical for antimicrobial signaling and cell wall reinforcement but can trigger catastrophic oxidative damage if unchecked (Torres et al., 2006 ; Mittler, 2017 ). To maintain redox homeostasis, plants deploy enzymatic antioxidants (e.g., superoxide dismutase [SOD], catalase [CAT], ascorbate peroxidase [APX]) and non-enzymatic compounds (e.g., proline, glutathione) to scavenge ROS and repair cellular damage (Mittler, 2017 ; Hasanuzzaman et al., 2018 ). Proline, in particular, is a multifunctional osmolyte that stabilizes membranes, detoxifies methylglyoxal, and enhances antioxidant capacity under biotic and abiotic stress (Christgen and Becker, 2019 ). Recent studies suggest that ROS management and antioxidant activity are pivotal in wheat blast resistance by the genotype S615 carrying Rmg8 gene (Islam et al. 2025 ), yet their role in 2NS-associated blast resistance remains unknown. We hypothesize that the 2NS translocation enhances the antioxidant defense system in BG33, enabling it to mitigate oxidative stress and suppress MoT colonization. To test this, we (i) compare ROS accumulation and oxidative damage in resistant (BG33) and susceptible (BARI Gom 26, BG26) cultivars during MoT infection; (ii) quantify constitutive and induced activity of key enzymatic (SOD, CAT, APX, GPX, GR, DHAR, MDHAR, GST) and non-enzymatic (proline) antioxidants; and (iii) establish a mechanistic link between antioxidant efficiency and 2NS-mediated blast resistance. By elucidating how BG33’s redox machinery thwarts MoT, this study addresses a critical knowledge gap in wheat blast resistance and provides actionable insights for breeding climate-resilient, disease-tolerant wheat varieties. Results MoT inoculation causes visible symptoms on wheat spike To assess the resistance of wheat to the wheat blast pathogen, we artificially inoculated wheat spikes of the varieties BG33 and BG26 at the flowering stage using a conidial suspension of Magnaporthe oryzae triticum (MoT). Ten days post-inoculation, BG26 displayed clear symptoms of severe spike infection. In contrast, the rachis of the moderately to highly resistant variety BG33 showed only mild symptoms, characterized by partial bleaching and shrinkage of the upper section (see Fig. 1 ). These findings confirm that the experimental conditions and spike inoculation assay were suitable for studying reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and the responses of BG33, which carries the 2NS blast resistance chromosomal segment, to MoT infection through its antioxidant defense system. MoT inoculation induces differential oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation in wheat rachis To evaluate the induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and subsequent cellular damage during infection, we quantified hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), malondialdehyde (MDA) content, and lipoxygenase (LOX) activity in the rachis tissues of BG33 (resistant) and BG26 (susceptible) following inoculation with MoT conidia. While H₂O₂ acts as a vital signaling molecule under normal physiological conditions, its excessive accumulation is a hallmark of oxidative stress. Following MoT inoculation, a progressive increase in H₂O₂ levels was observed in both varieties (Fig. 2 A). However, the resistant variety, BG33, maintained significantly tighter control over ROS accumulation. At 24 hours after inoculation (hai), H₂O₂ content increased by only 6% in BG33 compared to 12% in BG26 relative to their respective untreated controls. This trend intensified by 48 hai, with H₂O₂ levels rising to 30% in BG26, while BG33 limited the increase to 19% (Fig. 2 D). Untreated rachis tissues in both varieties maintained low baseline H₂O₂ concentrations, confirming that the observed oxidative surge was a direct response to fungal infection. The extent of oxidative damage was further assessed through lipid peroxidation markers. MoT infection significantly enhanced the accumulation of MDA, a byproduct of polyunsaturated fatty acid oxidation. Throughout the infection period, BG33 consistently exhibited lower MDA levels than BG26 (Fig. 2 B). Specifically, at 24 hai, MDA levels rose by 45% in BG26 but only by 27% in BG33. By 48 hai, this disparity widened, with MDA levels escalating by 79% in the susceptible BG26 compared to 54% in the resistant BG33 (Fig. 2 D). Parallel to the MDA trends, MoT inoculation triggered a sharp rise in LOX activity, which facilitates the oxidation of lipids. At 24 hai, LOX activity increased by 116% in both genotypes relative to controls. However, by 48 hai, LOX activity escalated further to 158% in BG26, whereas BG33 showed a more tempered increase of 143% (Fig. 2 C, 2 D). Collectively, these results demonstrate that the resistant BG33 variety effectively mitigates MoT -induced oxidative stress and preserves membrane integrity more efficiently than the susceptible BG26. MoT inoculation impacts chlorophyll and carotenoid content in wheat rachis Chlorophyll is the primary pigment driving photosynthesis and is essential for maintaining plant vigor and systemic resistance to pathogens. To evaluate the physiological impact of MoT infection, we quantified the levels of chlorophyll a , chlorophyll b , total chlorophyll, and carotenoids in the rachis of the resistant variety BG33 and the susceptible variety BG26 following inoculation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that while variety (G) and hours after inoculation (hai) had significant effects on pigment levels, the most pronounced declines were observed at 48 hai across both varieties (Fig. 3 ). However, the degradation of photosynthetic pigments was notably more severe in the susceptible variety BG26 compared to the resistant variety BG33. At 24 hai, chlorophyll a levels decreased by 22% in BG26, whereas BG33 restricted this loss to 14%. By 48 hai, this disparity widened significantly; chlorophyll a levels plummeted by 55% in BG26 but only by 36% in BG33. A similar trend was observed for chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll content. Chlorophyll b levels were reduced by 58% in BG26 at 48 hai, while BG33 maintained higher integrity with a 40% reduction. Total chlorophyll followed this pattern, showing a 56% decrease in BG26 compared to a more tempered 37% decline in BG33 (Fig. 3 C, E). Furthermore, MoT inoculation significantly depleted carotenoid levels—pigments critical for mitigating photo-oxidative damage. [cite_start]At 24 hai, carotenoid content dropped by 20% in BG26 but only by 8% in BG33. This trend continued through 48 hai, with a 48% reduction in BG26 compared to a 26% reduction in BG33. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that the resistant variety BG33, which carries the 2NS chromosomal segment, exhibits superior preservation of photosynthetic pigments following MoT challenge. This ability to maintain pigment integrity likely supports the robust antioxidant defense system observed in BG33, contrasting with the rapid pigment degradation and subsequent oxidative vulnerability seen in the susceptible BG26. MoT inoculation differentially enhances proline accumulation in wheat rachis Proline is a multifunctional amino acid that plays a pivotal role in osmotic adjustment and ROS scavenging, particularly during the early stages of pathogen infection. To determine whether proline contributes to the 2NS-mediated resistance in BG33, we quantified its accumulation in the rachis of both BG33 and BG26 following MoT inoculation. Proline levels increased progressively in both varieties at 24 and 48 hours after inoculation (hai) (Fig. 4 A). Notably, the resistant variety BG33 maintained significantly higher proline concentrations than the susceptible BG26 across all time points, including a higher constitutive (basal) level prior to inoculation. At 24 hai, proline content increased by 36% in BG33 compared to a 26% increase in BG26 relative to their respective untreated controls. This trend became more pronounced by 48 hai, with proline levels surging by 63% in BG33 and 56% in BG26 (Fig. 4 E). These results indicate that BG33 not only possesses a higher baseline of this protective osmolyte but also triggers a more robust proline-mediated response upon MoT challenge, likely contributing to its superior redox stability. Enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities in the blast-resistant wheat variety carrying the 2NS chromosomal segment Antioxidant enzymes are fundamental to plant defense, providing a critical buffer against pathogen-induced oxidative bursts. To determine if the 2NS-mediated resistance in BG33 is linked to a more efficient enzymatic response, we assayed the activities of major antioxidant enzymes in the rachis tissues of both resistant (BG33) and susceptible (BG26) varieties following MoT inoculation. Our results indicate that BG33 maintains a significantly more robust and sustained antioxidant enzymatic profile compared to BG26 (Figs. 4 and 5 ). Upon MoT challenge, both varieties exhibited an upward trend in primary antioxidant defense enzyme activities. However, the induction was consistently more pronounced in the resistant BG33. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, which catalyzes the first step of ROS detoxification, rose by 23% in BG33 at 48 hours after inoculation (hai), compared to a more modest 15% increase in BG26 (Fig. 4 B, E). Even more striking differences were observed in hydrogen peroxide-scavenging enzymes. Catalase (CAT) activity in BG33 surged by 46% at 48 hai, more than double the 17% increase observed in BG26 (Fig. 4 C, E). Similarly, peroxidase (POD) activity showed a sharp differential response; while BG26 reached a 36% increase at 48 hai, BG33 exhibited a substantial 68% rise, nearly doubling the activity of the susceptible variety (Fig. 4 D, E). The AsA–GSH cycle is vital for maintaining cellular redox homeostasis. We observed significant upregulation across all enzymes in this pathway including ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), glutathione reductase (GR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), and monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR) with BG33 consistently outperforming BG26. At 48 hai, APX and GPX activities in BG33 rose by 66% and 41%, respectively, significantly higher than the 55% and 23% increases seen in BG26 (Fig. 5 A, B, G). The recycling enzymes of the cycle also showed superior efficiency in the resistant variety; GR and MDHAR activities in BG33 reached increases of 58% and 31%, respectively, compared to 44% and 12% in BG26 (Fig. 5 C, E, G). Notably, DHAR activity in BG26 showed a sharp decline in induction between 24 and 48 hai (dropping from 13% to 5%), whereas BG33 maintained a high induction of 31%, suggesting a sustained capacity for ascorbate regeneration in the resistant variety. Finally, glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity, which facilitates the detoxification of lipid hydroperoxides, was enhanced by 31% in BG33 at 48 hai, nearly twice the induction level of 16% observed in BG26 (Fig. 5 F, G). Collectively, these data demonstrate that the 2NS translocation in BG33 confers resistance by priming a broad-spectrum and highly vigorous antioxidant enzymatic network. Influence of variety and post-inoculation time on physiological and biochemical parameters To validate the observed physiological changes, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to evaluate the influence of variety (G), hours after inoculation (H), and their interaction (G×H) on the measured parameters (Table 1 ).The analysis revealed that the variety (G) had a significant main effect (p < 0.05) on nearly all parameters examined, with the exception of chlorophyll b (Chl b ) and carotenoids (Caro), indicating that the genetic background (2NS vs. non-2NS) is a primary determinant of the wheat's physiological state. Furthermore, the duration of infection (hai) demonstrated a highly significant effect ( $ p < 0.01 $ ) on every parameter, confirming a dynamic physiological shift over the course of the MoT challenge. Notably, significant interaction effects between variety and time (G×H) were observed for the majority of the biochemical markers, including ROS accumulation and antioxidant enzyme activities. However, no significant G×H interaction was found for leaf pigments and proline content (Table 1 ), suggesting that while these specific parameters were significantly affected by both variety and time independently, their rate of change followed a similar trend in both genotypes post-inoculation. Table 1 Variance components of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and their significance level of studied traits using the general linear model Trait Variety (G) hai (H) G×H Residual DF 1 2 2 15 H 2 O 2 3.705 ** 4.057 ** 0.261 * 0.059 MDA 53.104 ** 581.588 ** 19.168 ** 2.447 LOX 0.451 ** 3.227 ** 0.106 ** 0.011 Chl a 0.015 *** 0.016467 *** 0.0002 ns 0.00043 Chl b 0.000417 ns 0.004517 *** 0.000317 ns 0.000147 TChl 0.01000 ** 0.03750 *** 0.00113 ns 0.00091 Caro 0.0000667 ns 0.0026792 *** 0.0003792 ns 0.0001083 Proline 27.714 ** 15.366 ** 0.779 ns 0.293 SOD 567.648 ** 2147.051 ** 332.778 ** 12.641 CAT 4737.66 ** 866.552 ** 263.981 ** 17.551 POD 0.269 ** 0.093 ** 0.018 ** 0.002 APX 3.832 ** 4.957 ** 0.173 ** 0.024 GPX 4243.232 ** 3978.647 ** 450.344 ** 33.782 GR 36.605 ** 773.906 ** 13.305 * 2.299 DHAR 267.534 ** 2668.343 ** 663.226 ** 29.4 MDHAR 301.467 * 1639.949 ** 328.472 ** 42.499 GST 14818.055 ** 15375.623 ** 1641.025 ** 64.282 hai− hours after inoculation, DF− degrees of freedom, Chl a − chlorophyll a , Chl b − chlorophyll b , TChl− total chlorophyll, Caro− carotenoids, H 2 O 2 − hydrogen peroxide, MDA− malondialdehyde, LOX− lipoxygenase, SOD− superoxide dismutase, CAT− catalase, POD− peroxidase, GPX− glutathione peroxidase, GST− glutathione-S-transferase, APX− ascorbate peroxidase, GR− glutathione reductase, DHAR− dehydroascorbate reductase, MDHAR− monodehydroascorbate reductase. ns , * , and ** indicate statistically non-significant, significant at p < 0.05, and 0.01, respectively. MoT resistance in wheat rachis: A multifaceted defense To integrate the physiological and biochemical responses observed, a comparative heatmap analysis was performed. The analysis categorized the evaluated traits into three distinct functional clusters: prooxidants and markers of oxidative damage (Cluster I), photosynthetic pigments (Cluster II), and antioxidant enzymes alongside the osmoprotectant proline (Cluster III) (Fig. 6 ). Under control conditions, both BG26 and BG33 exhibited similar pigment profiles and biochemical baselines, clustering closely together. However, following MoT inoculation, the two varieties diverged significantly, reflecting their contrasting strategies for managing infection-induced oxidative stress. The superior resistance to MoT in BG33 appears to be derived from a coordinated, multifaceted defense mechanism. Unlike the susceptible BG26, the resistant variety BG33 effectively restricted the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in significantly lower levels of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), malondialdehyde (MDA), and lipoxygenase (LOX) activity post-inoculation. This mitigation of oxidative damage was strongly associated with the robust upregulation of Cluster III components. BG33 maintained substantially higher activities of key antioxidant enzymes and accumulated greater levels of proline, which likely served as both a ROS scavenger and a vital osmoprotectant. Collectively, these findings suggest that the 2NS chromosomal segment in BG33 confers resistance by "priming" a more resilient antioxidant network, which preserves cellular integrity and limits the physiological impact of wheat blast infection. Discussion Plant resistance to pathogens involves complex metabolic recalibrations centered largely on the activation of robust antioxidant systems to maintain cellular homeostasis. This study reveals that the wheat blast-resistant variety BARI Gom 33 (BG33), which carries the 2NS chromosomal translocation, exhibits a significantly more vigorous antioxidant defense network against M. oryzae Triticum (MoT) than the susceptible variety BARI Gom 26 (BG26). Our findings establish a clear mechanistic link between 2NS-mediated resistance and superior redox management. By effectively neutralizing the oxidative burst during infection, BG33 preserves cellular integrity and restricts fungal colonization, providing a physiological explanation for the lower blast severity previously documented in the rachis of this variety (Hossain et al., 2019 ). While antioxidant activation was recently linked to the Rmg8 gene, our work extends this paradigm to the widely utilized 2NS segment, demonstrating its fundamental role in biochemical defense (Islam et al., 2025 ). A critical observation in this study is that BG33 accumulated 40–60% less reactive oxygen species (ROS), specifically hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and malondialdehyde (MDA), following MoT challenge compared to BG26. This reduction indicates minimal lipid peroxidation and superior membrane stability. Notably, the 2NS translocation appears to "prime" BG33 for a rapid ROS detoxification response, a capacity that is strikingly weak in BG26 suggesting that the 2NS segment confers a form of preemptive stress adaptation. Furthermore, BG33 maintained 30–50% higher levels of chlorophyll and carotenoids post-infection, mitigating the photo-oxidative damage that typically accompanies the hemibiotrophic invasion of MoT . The decline in chlorophyll content observed during MoT infection in this study is consistent with earlier reports from various plant-pathogen interactions. Similar reductions have been documented in Brassica species infected with Alternaria spp. (Munir et al., 2020 ) and Alternaria brassicicola (Macioszek et al., 2020 ), in eggplant affected by leaf spot-associated pathogenic fungi (Kaniyassery et al., 2024 ), and in wheat challenged by Pyricularia oryzae (Debona et al., 2016 ) particularly during the early stages of infection, such as 48 hours post-inoculation. The preservation of carotenoids, which are vital for quenching singlet oxygen, points to a synergistic relationship between enzymatic antioxidants and pigment-based chemical defenses. In contrast, the rapid pigment degradation in BG26 likely exacerbated ROS accumulation, mirroring the physiological collapse seen in other susceptible cereal-pathogen interactions (Chrpová et al., 2021 ). The role of proline as a multifaceted metabolic sentinel is also highlighted by our data, as BG33 exhibited constitutive proline levels 2.1-fold higher than BG26, which surged further upon infection. Beyond its role as an osmoprotectant, proline may participate in reactive nitrogen species (RNS) signaling to enhance pathogen defense (Christgen & Becker, 2021), positioning it as a key metabolite in the 2NS-mediated resistance framework. Our analysis of the enzymatic landscape further revealed that primary scavengers, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) exhibited 1.5- to 2.5-fold higher activity in BG33. The rapid conversion of superoxide anions to H₂O₂ by SOD, followed by efficient neutralization by CAT and APX, suggests a highly synchronized ROS-scavenging cascade. Interestingly, GST activity in BG33 exceeded that of BG26 by 80%, a trend reminiscent of Fhb7 -mediated resistance to Fusarium head blight (Wang et al., 2020 ). These enzymes may also play a specialized role in detoxifying MoT -derived phytotoxins, a hypothesis that warrants further investigation through toxin-profiling experiments. The ascorbate-glutathione (AsA-GSH) cycle emerged as a "hyperactive" engine of resistance in BG33. While BG33 increased the activities of APX, GR, MDHAR, and DHAR by up to 2.2-fold post-infection, BG26 showed a suppression of these enzymes, likely leading to the depletion of the protective AsA/GSH pool. This sustained recycling capacity is a hallmark of durable resistance, ensuring that the plant can withstand prolonged oxidative pressure. While the 2NS segment is a known driver of heat tolerance (Mohi-Ud-Din et al., 2022 ), this study is the first to explicitly link it to antioxidant-mediated resistance against wheat blast. This functional overlap between abiotic and biotic stress pathways underscores the evolutionary versatility of the 2NS translocation, suggesting it harbors regulatory elements that broaden the expression of antioxidant gene families. Our findings establish the 2NS translocation as a master regulator of oxidative stress management, providing a "dual-defense" strategy against both fungal pathogens and environmental stressors. To build upon this mechanistic framework, future research should prioritize the genetic dissection of the 2NS segment using CRISPR-based approaches to clone specific genes that modulate these antioxidant pathways (Islam 2019 ; Khayer et al. 2026 ). Additionally, assessing the stability of these traits across diverse agroclimatic zones and investigating the crosstalk between physiological antioxidant pathways and classical R-gene signaling will be essential for developing "stacked" resistance models. By shifting the breeding focus toward enhancing antioxidant capacity alongside vertical resistance, this study contributes a sustainable and robust strategy for safeguarding global wheat production against the escalating threat of wheat blast. Conclusion This study provides comprehensive evidence that the 2NS chromosomal translocation in the wheat variety BARI Gom 33 (BG33) confers resistance to M. oryzae Triticum (MoT) by activating a sophisticated and multi-tiered antioxidant defense system. Unlike the susceptible variety BARI Gom 26 (BG26), BG33 effectively mitigates infection-induced oxidative stress by maintaining significantly lower levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxidation markers. This physiological resilience is driven by the robust upregulation of key enzymatic antioxidants including SOD, CAT, and POD alongside a highly efficient ascorbate-glutathione (AsA-GSH) cycle. Furthermore, the elevated accumulation of proline and the superior preservation of photosynthetic pigments in BG33 suggest a coordinated mechanism that protects cellular integrity and maintains metabolic vigor under pathogen pressure. These findings establish the 2NS segment as a critical genetic resource not only for blast resistance but also for enhancing redox homeostasis in wheat. Future research should prioritize the identification and cloning of the specific regulatory genes within the 2NS segment that modulate these antioxidant pathways. Elucidating these molecular foundations will be instrumental in developing more resilient, high-yielding wheat varieties capable of withstanding the increasing global threat of wheat blast. Materials and methods Plant Materials and MoT Isolate Wheat seeds of cultivars BARI Gom 26 (BG26) and BARI Gom 33 (BG33) were procured from the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, Bangladesh. A randomized complete block design with four replications was employed for field sowing in late November at the research field of Gazipur Agricultural University (GAU), Gazipur, Bangladesh. The wheat blast isolate BTJP 4–5, obtained from the Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (IBGE) at GAU, was reactivated from − 80°C storage on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium for subsequent experimentation. Preparation of MoT Inoculum and Inoculation Assay MoT conidia were obtained as described by Gupta et al. ( 2020 ). Briefly, mycelium blocks were cultured on PDA amended with 0.05 g/L phenoxymethylpenicillin at 25°C for 8 days in the dark. Subsequent incubation under blue light for 48 hours induced sporulation. Conidia were harvested by gently scraping the plates with a paintbrush while flooded with 0.01% Tween 20 in sterile water. The suspension was filtered through cheesecloth and adjusted to a concentration of 1 × 10⁵ conidia/mL. Wheat plants were thoroughly sprayed with the conidial suspension, while controls received a sterile water-Tween 20 solution. High humidity (80–100%) was maintained for 48 hours by covering the plants with sterilized polyethylene. Plants were incubated at 25–30°C to facilitate blast symptom development. Infected spikes were collected at 0-, 24-, and 48-hours post-inoculation. Spikelets were removed, and the rachis was sectioned, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C for subsequent analyses. Determination of photosynthetic pigments and osmolyte proline Fresh plant samples (approximately 100 mg) were extracted with 5 mL of 80% acetone in glass vials. The vials were stored at 4°C in the dark for 24 hours. Subsequently, absorbance was measured at 663 nm, 646 nm, and 470 nm. Chlorophyll a (Chl a ), Chlorophyll b (Chl b ), total chlorophyll (TChl), and carotenoid content were quantified using the formulas of Arnon ( 1949 ) and expressed as mg g⁻¹ fresh weight (FW). Proline content in the rachis was determined according to the method of Bates et al. ( 1973 ) and expressed as µmol g⁻¹ FW. Determination of H 2 O 2 and MDA content Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) levels were quantified using the method described by Yu et al. ( 2003 ). The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 410 nm using a spectrophotometer. H₂O₂ content was calculated using an extinction coefficient of 0.28 µM⁻¹ cm⁻¹ and expressed as µmol g⁻¹ fresh weight (FW). Membrane lipid peroxidation, assessed by malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, was determined using the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) method of Heath and Packer ( 1968 ). MDA concentration was calculated using an extinction coefficient of 155 mM⁻¹ cm⁻¹ and expressed as nmol g⁻¹ FW. Extraction of Enzymes and Soluble Proteins, and Measurement of Enzymatic Activity Plant tissue samples (1 g each) were meticulously homogenized in an ice-cold extraction buffer. This buffer, a carefully formulated solution of 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0), incorporated 100 mM KCl to maintain ionic balance, 1 mM ascorbate to protect against oxidation, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol to preserve thiol groups, and 10% ( w / v ) glycerol to prevent enzyme denaturation. The resulting homogenates were then subjected to centrifugation at 11,500× g for 12 minutes, effectively separating the cellular debris from the soluble protein fraction. The supernatant, enriched with the enzymes of interest, was carefully collected for subsequent enzymatic activity assays. To quantify the total protein content in the enzyme extracts, the Bradford method was employed, a well-established colorimetric technique (Bradford, 1976 ). This method relies on the binding of Coomassie Brilliant Blue dye to proteins, resulting in a shift in the dye's absorption spectrum, allowing for a sensitive and accurate determination of protein concentration. The activity of key antioxidant enzymes was then meticulously measured. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, crucial for neutralizing superoxide radicals, was determined using the xanthine-xanthine oxidase system, following the established protocol of Spitz and Oberley ( 1989 ). Lipoxygenase (LOX) activity, involved in fatty acid oxidation, was measured according to the method of Doderer et al. ( 1992 ), utilizing linoleic acid as the substrate. Catalase (CAT) activity, responsible for decomposing hydrogen peroxide, was assessed as described by Noctor et al. ( 2016 ), with the reaction initiated by the addition of the enzyme extract and activity calculated based on the characteristic absorption of the reaction product. Peroxidase (POD) activity, another key enzyme in the antioxidant defense system, was determined using the established method of Castillo et al. ( 1984 ). The activity of glutathione peroxidase (GPX), an essential enzyme for reducing hydrogen peroxide, was measured using H₂O₂ as the substrate, following the protocol of Elia et al. ( 2003 ). Furthermore, the activities of several other crucial antioxidant enzymes were spectrophotometrically determined according to the established protocol of Hasanuzzaman et al. ( 2014 ). These enzymes included glutathione S-transferase (GST), involved in detoxification processes, glutathione reductase (GR) essential for maintaining the reduced form of glutathione, ascorbate peroxidase (APX) crucial for scavenging hydrogen peroxide, monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR) involved in recycling ascorbate, and dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) also essential for ascorbate regeneration. Statistical Analysis Data analysis was conducted using a linear model within an R-4.1.0 for Windows environment (R Core Team, 2013) framework for a factorial randomized complete block design. Statistical analyses, including two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and subsequent mean comparisons using Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test, were performed with the aid of R packages: ggplot2, ggthemes, multcompView, dplyr, stats, and patchwork (Wickham, 2016 ). Boxplots were generated using these packages to visually represent the data distribution. Mean differences were considered statistically significant at a significance level of p < 0.05. Furthermore, a heatmap was created using the R package pheatmap (Kolde, 2019 ) to visualize the relationships between variables. Abbreviations APX Ascorbate peroxidase BARI Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute CAT Catalase GPX Glutathione peroxidase GST Glutathione-S-transferase LOX Lipoxygenase MDA Malondialdehyde MoT Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum POD Peroxidase ROS Reactive Oxygen Species Declarations Availability of data and materials The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Author contributions statement M.S.I., M.M. and D.R.G. conducted the experiments, curated the data, performed data analysis, and wrote the first draft. T.I., D.R.G and M.M. contributed to experimental design and editing; T.I., and D.R.G. supervised the research and edited the manuscript. D.R.G., M.S.I., M.M.R. and M.M. contributed to biochemical analysis. T.I. conceptualized the idea, supervised experiments, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. M.R. reviewed and edited the manuscript Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interests. Acknowledgements The authors are thankful to the Research Management Wing of Gazipur Agricultural University, Bangladesh and Krishi Gobeshona Foundation of Bangladesh for funding to this research project. References Afzal F, Rabia Khurshid, Muhammad Ashraf, Alvina Gul Kazi. Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidants in Response to Pathogens and Wounding, Edi: Parvaiz Ahmad In: Oxidative Damage to Plants. Academic Press, 2014,Pages 397-424. Apel, K., and Hirt, H. 2004. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55: 373-399. Arnon, D. 1949. Copper enzymes isolated chloroplasts, polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris . Plant. Physiol. 24, 1–15. Asuke, S., Morita, K., Shimizu, M., Abe, F., Terauchi, R., Nago, C., Takahashi, Y., Shibata, M., Yoshioka, M., Iwakawa, M., et al. 2024. Evolution of wheat blast resistance gene Rmg8 accompanied by differentiation of variants recognizing the powdery mildew fungus. Nat. Plants 10:971-983. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-024-01711-1. Bariana HS, McIntosh RA (1994) Characterisation and origin of rust and powdery mildew resistance genes in VPM1 wheat. Euphytica 76:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024020 Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teari, D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant. Soil 39, 205–207. Bauriegel, E., Giebel, A. and Herppich, W.B., 2010. Rapid Fusarium head blight detection on winter wheat ears using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual, 83(2), pp.196-203. Bhattacharjee, P., Ali, J., Islam, T. 2025. Management of wheat blast disease in Bangladesh caused by Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum . Plant Health Cases, phcs20250025. https://doi.org/10.1079/planthealthcases.2025.0025 Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical biochemistry, 72(1-2): 248-254. Castillo, F.I.; Penel, I.; Greppin, H. 1984. Peroxidase release induced by ozone in Sedum album leaves. Plant. Physiol. 74, 846–851. Cecchini, N. M., Monteoliva, M. I., and Alvarez, M. E. (2011). Proline dehydrogenase contributes to pathogen defense in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 155, 1947–1959. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.167163 Chen S, Zhang W, Bolus S, Rouse MN, Dubcovsky J (2018) Identification and characterization of wheat stem rust resistance gene Sr21 effective against the Ug99 race group at high temperature. PLoS Genet 14(4): e1007287. Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, C., Lü, W., Jin, J. B., and Hua, X. (2011). Proline induces calcium-mediated oxidative burst and salicylic acid signaling. Amino Acids 40, 1473–1484. doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0757-2 Christgen SL, Becker DF. 2019. Role of proline in pathogen and host interactions. Antioxid Redox Signal. 30(4):683-709. doi:10.1089/ars.2017.7335 Chrpová, J., Orsák, M., Martinek, P., Lachman, J., & Trávníčková, M. 2021. Potential role and involvement of antioxidants and other secondary metabolites of wheat in the infection process and resistance to Fusarium spp. Agronomy, 11(11), 2235. Cruz C. D., Peterson G. L., Bockus W. W., Kankanala P., Dubcovsky J., Jordan K., et al. (2016). The 2NS translocation from Aegilops ventricosa confers resistance to the Triticum pathotype of Magnaporthe oryzae . Crop Sci. 56 990–1000. 10.2135/cropsci2015.07.0410 Cruz CD, Valent B (2017) Wheat blast disease: danger on the move. Trop Plant Pathol 42:210–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-017-0159-z Debona, D., Rodrigues, F.Á., Rios, J.A. and Nascimento, K.J.T., 2012. Biochemical changes in the leaves of wheat plants infected by Pyricularia oryzae . Phytopathology, 102(12), pp.1121-1129. Debona, D., Rios, J. A., Nascimento, K. J. T., Silva, L. C. and Rodrigues, F. A. 2016. Influence of magnesium on physiological responses of wheat infected by Pyricularia oryzae . Plant Pathol. 65: 114-123. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12390 Doderer A, Kokkelink I, van der Veen S, Valk BE, Schram AW, Douma AC. 1992. Purification and characterization of two lipoxygenase isoenzymes from germinating barley. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1120:97–104. 10.1016/0167-4838(92)90429-H Ehsani-Moghaddam B, Charles MT, Carisse O, Khanizadeh S (2006) Superoxide dismutase responses of strawberry cultivars to infection by Mycosphaerella fragariae . Journal of Plant Physiology 163:147–153 El-Komy, M.H., Saleh, A.A., Ibrahim, Y.E. et al. Early production of reactive oxygen species coupled with an efficient antioxidant system play a role in potato resistance to late blight. Trop. plant pathol. 45, 44–55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-019-00318-8 Elia, A.C.; Galarini, R.; Taticchi, M.I.; Dörr, A.J.; Mantilacci, L. 2003. Antioxidant responses and bioaccumulation in Ictalurus melas under mercury exposure. Ecotoxicol. Env. Saf. 55, 162–167. Gao L, Koo DH, Juliana P (2021) The Aegilops ventricosa 2N v S segment in bread wheat: cytology, genomics and breeding. Theor Appl Genet 134:529–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-020-03712-y Ghosh TK, Tompa NH, Rahman MM, Mohi-Ud-Din M, Al-Meraj SMZ, Biswas MS, Mostofa MG. 2021. Acclimation of liverwort Marchantia polymorpha to physiological drought reveals important roles of antioxidant enzymes, proline and abscisic acid in land plant adaptation to osmotic stress. PeerJ 9: e12419. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12419. Gill, S.S. and Tuteja, N. 2010. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant physiology and Biochemistry, 48(12), 909-930. Gupta DR, Surovy MZ, Mahmud NU, Chakraborty M, et al. 2020. Suitable methods for isolation, culture, storage and identification of wheat blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum pathotype. Phytopathology Research. 2:30. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Alam, M.M.; Rahman, A.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Fujita, M. 2014. Exogenous proline and glycine betaine mediated upregulation of antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems provides better protection against salt-induced oxidative stress in two rice ( Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 757219. Hasanuzzaman M., Mahmud J.A., Anee T.I., Nahar K., Islam M.T. Drought stress tolerance in wheat: Omics approaches in understanding and enhancing antioxidant defense. In: Zargar S.M., Zargar M.Y., editors. Abiotic Stress-Mediated Sensing and Signaling in Plants: An Omics Perspective. Springer; Singapore: 2018. 267–307. Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. 1968. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplast: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 125, 189–198. Hemetsberger C, Herrberger C, Zechmann B, Hillmer M, Doehlemann G (2012) The Ustilago maydis Effector Pep1 Suppresses Plant Immunity by Inhibition of Host Peroxidase Activity. PLoS Pathog 8(5): e1002684. Hossain A., Mottaleb K. A., Farhad M., Barma N. C. (2019). Mitigating the twin problems of malnutrition and wheat blast by one wheat variety, “BARI Gom 33”, in Bangladesh. Acta Agrobot. 72:1775. 10.5586/aa.1775 Islam T (2019) CRISPR-Cas technology in modifying food crops. CAB Rev 14: 50. Islam, M. T., Croll, D., Gladieux, P., Soanes, D. M., Persoons, A., Bhattacharjee, P., et al., 2016. Emergence of wheat blast in Bangladesh was caused by a South American lineage of Magnaporthe oryzae . BMC biology, 14(1): 84. Islam, M.T., Gupta, D.R., Hossain, A., Roy, K.K., He, X., Kabir, M.R., Singh, P.K., Khan, M.A.R., Rahman, M. and Wang, G.L., 2020. Wheat blast: a new threat to food security. Phytopathology Research, 2(1), 1-13. Islam, T., and Azad, R. B. 2024. Rmg8 gene against wheat blast. Nat. Plants 10:836–837. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01690-3 Islam, M. S., Mohi-Ud-Din, M., Gupta, D.R., Rahman, M.M., Ghosh, T.K., Rahman, M., Islam, T. 2025. Wheat Genotype S615 carrying the Rmg8 gene Exhibits enhanced antioxidant defense for resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum . Phytopathology, Published Online: 10 Sep 2025 https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-06-25-0206-R Juliana P, He X, Kabir MR, Roy KK, Anwar MB, Marza F, Poland J, Shrestha S, Singh RP, Singh PK. Genome-wide association mapping for wheat blast resistance in CIMMYT's international screening nurseries evaluated in Bolivia and Bangladesh. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 2;10(1):15972. Kamoun S, Talbot NJ, Islam MT (2019) Plant health emergencies demand open science: Tackling a cereal killer on the run. PLoS Biol 17(6): e3000302. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000302 Kaniyassery, A., Hegde, M., Sathish, S. B., Thorat, S. A., Udupa, S., Murali, T. S., Muthusamy, A. 2024. Leaf spot-associated pathogenic fungi alter photosynthetic, biochemical, and metabolic responses in eggplant during the early stages of infection. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 133, 102320, doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2024.102320 Khayer, A., Ye, P., Eti, F.S. et al. Field pathogenomics and evolutionary conservation unveil CRISPR-targetable susceptibility genes for wheat blast resistance. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36547-6 Kidwai, M., Ahmad, I.Z. & Chakrabarty, D. Class III peroxidase: an indispensable enzyme for biotic/abiotic stress tolerance and a potent candidate for crop improvement. Plant Cell Rep 39, 1381–1393 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-020-02588-y Koç E, Ayşen Sülün Üstün, Cemil İşlek, Yeliz Kaşko Arıcı. Defence responses in leaves of resistant and susceptible pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars infected with different inoculum concentrations of Phytophthora capsici Leon. Scientia Horticulturae, Volume 128, Issue 4, 2011,Pages 434-442. Kolde R 2019: pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. R package version 1.0.12 . Avaiable online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/pheatmap.pdf (accessed on 5 September 2021). Kolmer JA, Jin Y, Long DL (2007) Wheat leaf and stem rust in the United states. Aust J Agric Res 58: 631-638. Kuźniak, E., Kopczewski, T., Chojak-Koźniewska, J. (2017). Ascorbate-Glutathione Cycle and Biotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. In: Hossain, M., Munné-Bosch, S., Burritt, D., Diaz-Vivancos, P., Fujita, M., Lorence, A. (eds) Ascorbic Acid in Plant Growth, Development and Stress Tolerance. Springer, Cham. Li, L., Zhu, F., Liu, H., Chu, A., and Lo, C. (2013). Isolation and expression analysis of defense-related genes in sorghum - Colletotrichum sublineolum interaction. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 84, 123–130. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2013.08.005 Li, ZX., Lan, JB., Liu, YQ, Qi L-W, Tang J-M. 2020. Investigation of the role of AcTPR2 in kiwifruit and its response to Botrytis cinerea infection. BMC Plant Biol 20, 557. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02773-x Macioszek, V. K. Gapińska, M., Zmienko, A., Sobczak, M., Skoczowski, A. Oliwa, J., Kononowicz, A. K. 2020. Complexity of Brassica oleracea–Alternaria brassicicola susceptible interaction reveals downregulation of photosynthesis at ultrastructural, transcriptional, and physiological levels. Cells, 9 (10), p. 2329, doi: 10.3390/cells9102329 Mittler R. 2017. ROS are good. Trends Plant Sci. 22(1), 11-19. Mohi-Ud-Din M , Rohman MM, Alam MA, Hasanuzzaman M, Islam T (2022) Wheat variety carrying 2N v S chromosomal segment provides yield advantage through lowering terminal heat–induced oxidative stress. Protoplasma (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-022-01759-w Mohi-Ud-Din M , Siddiqui N, Rohman M, Jagadish SVK, Ahmed JU, Hassan MM, Hossain A, Islam T (2021) Physiological and Biochemical Dissection Reveals a Trade-Off between Antioxidant Capacity and Heat Tolerance in Bread Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). Antioxidants 10 , 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10030351 Mohi-Ud-Din, M., Hossain, M. A., Rohman, M. M., Uddin, M. N., Haque, M. S., Tahery, M. H., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2025). Multi-Trait Index-Based Selection of Drought Tolerant Wheat: Physiological and Biochemical Profiling. Plants , 14 (1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14010035 Munir, S., Shahzad, A. N., Qureshi, M. K. 2020. Acuities into tolerance mechanisms via different bioassay during Brassicaceae- Alternaria brassicicola interaction and its impact on yield. PLoS One 15 (12), e0242545, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242545 Niu C, Wenjun W, Haiqin Y, Zhourui L, Pengyan Z, Xiaoping L. 2023. Ascorbate−glutathione cycle involving in response of Bangia fuscopurpurea (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) to hyposalinity. Frontiers in Marine Science. 10 Noctor, G.; Mhamdi, A.; Foyer, C.H. 2016. Oxidative stress and antioxidative systems: Recipes for successful data collection and interpretation. Plant, Cell & Environ. 39, 1140–1160. Osei, Solomon Boamah, Thomas Afriyie Boakye, Lijuan Wei, Mengjun Jin, Kwadwo Gyasi Santo, Isaac Takyi, Chengde Yang. 2023. In vitro application of proline in potato tubers under newly emerging bacteria Lelliottia amnigena infection. Microbial Pathogenesis, 178, 106053. Qamer Z., Chaudhary M.T., Du, X., Hinze L, & Azhar M T. 2021. Review of oxidative stress and antioxidative defense mechanisms in Gossypium hirsutum L. in response to extreme abiotic conditions. J Cotton Res 4, 9. Quan, L.J., Zhang, B., Shi, W.W. and Li, H.Y., 2008. Hydrogen peroxide in plants: a versatile molecule of the reactive oxygen species network. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 50(1), 2-18. R Core Team 2013: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/ Rohman MM, Islam MR, Habib SH, Choudhury DA, Mohi-Ud-Din M (2024). NADPH oxidase-mediated reactive oxygen species, antioxidant isozymes, and redox homeostasis regulate salt sensitivity in maize genotypes. Heliyon 9 , e26920 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26920 Saxena I , Srikanth Sandhya , Chen Zhong. 2016. Cross Talk between H2O2 and Interacting Signal Molecules under Plant Stress Response. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7. Singh YJ, Satvir Kaur Grewal, Ranjit Kaur Gill. 2021. Proline metabolism and phenylpropanoid pathway act independently in conferring resistance against yellow mosaic virus infection in black gram. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology,Volume 116, 101713, Spitz, D.R.; Oberley, L.W. 1989. An assay for superoxide dismutase activity in mammalian tissue homogenates. Anal. Biochem. 179, 8–18. Sun H, Hongbo Zhang, Zisong Xu, Yue Wang, Xiaoqian Liu, Yuanyuan Li, Bei Tian, Guangyu Sun, Huihui Zhang. 2021. TMT-based quantitative proteomic analysis of the effects of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci ( Pst ) infection on photosynthetic function and the response of the MAPK signaling pathway in tobacco leaves. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,Volume 166,Pages 657-667. Sunic K, Brkljacic L, Vukovic R, Katanic Z, Salopek-Sondi B, Spanic V. 2023. Fusarium Head Blight Infection Induced Responses of Six Winter Wheat Varieties in Ascorbate–Glutathione Pathway, Photosynthetic Efficiency and Stress Hormones. Plants. 2023; 12(21):3720. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12213720 Tembo B., Mulenga R. M., Sichilima S., M’siska K. K., Mwale M., Chikoti P. C., et al. (2020). Detection and characterization of fungus ( Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum ) causing wheat blast disease on rain-fed grown wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) in Zambia. PLoS One 15:e0238724. 10.1371/journal.pone.0238724. Torres MA, Jones JD, Dangl JL. 2006. Reactive oxygen species signaling in response to pathogens. Plant Physiol. 141(2), 373-378. doi:10.1104/pp.106.079467 USDA, 2022. Unites states Department of Agriculture. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/outlooks/104470/whs-22h.pdf?v=8189 Wang H, Sun S, Ge W, Zhao L, Hou B, Wang K, Lyu Z, Chen L, Xu S, Guo J, Li M, Su P, Li X, Wang G, Bo C, Fang X, Zhuang W, Cheng X, Wu J, Dong L, Chen W, Li W, Xiao G, Zhao J, Hao Y, Xu Y, Gao Y, Liu W, Liu Y, Yin H, Li J, Li X, Zhao Y, Wang X, Ni F, Ma X, Li A, Xu SS, Bai G, Nevo E, Gao C, Ohm H, Kong L. 2020. Horizontal gene transfer of Fhb7 from fungus underlies Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Science. 22;368(6493): eaba5435. Wei F, Shi J-C, Jin J-S, Duan Z-Y, Liang X, Luo J-N, Qiu L-j, Luo J, Xu X-n, Wen Y-Q, Feng J-Y. 2024. Comprehensive evaluation of resistance of different strawberry varieties to Xanthomonas fragariae, Scientia Horticulturae, Volume 325, 112647. Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer. New York, USA. Williamson VM, Thomas V, Ferris H, Dubcovsky J (2013) An Aegilops ventricosa translocation confers resistance against root-knot nematodesto common wheat. Crop Sci 53:1412–1418. Yu, C. W., T. M. Murphy, Lin, C. H. 2003. Hydrogen peroxide-induced chilling tolerance in mung beans mediated through ABA-independent glutathione accumulation. Functional Plant Biology 30(9), 955-963. Zainy Z, Fayyaz M, Yasmin T, Hyder MZ, Haider W, Farrakh S, 2023. Antioxidant enzymes activity and gene expression in wheat-stripe rust interaction at seedling stage. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology,Volume 124,101960. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 01 Apr, 2026 Reviews received at journal 26 Mar, 2026 Reviews received at journal 25 Mar, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 19 Mar, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 17 Mar, 2026 Reviews received at journal 09 Mar, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 13 Feb, 2026 Reviewers invited by journal 13 Feb, 2026 Editor invited by journal 03 Feb, 2026 Editor assigned by journal 01 Feb, 2026 Submission checks completed at journal 01 Feb, 2026 First submitted to journal 29 Jan, 2026 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8733903","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":591808071,"identity":"78c9edc6-4556-476e-8e1f-ae1124728c5d","order_by":0,"name":"Md Saiful Islam","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Md","middleName":"Saiful","lastName":"Islam","suffix":""},{"id":591808072,"identity":"e89a607a-66ef-4395-8829-30bf4b23c2cb","order_by":1,"name":"Mohammed Mohi-Ud-Din","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mohammed","middleName":"","lastName":"Mohi-Ud-Din","suffix":""},{"id":591808073,"identity":"d03f096e-d90d-480e-9655-06c67527706c","order_by":2,"name":"Dipali Rani Gupta","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dipali","middleName":"Rani","lastName":"Gupta","suffix":""},{"id":591808074,"identity":"512c3b0d-26af-4e15-a46b-e97dff5b9b79","order_by":3,"name":"Md. Motiar Rohman","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Md.","middleName":"Motiar","lastName":"Rohman","suffix":""},{"id":591808075,"identity":"963a592b-1bac-4ed1-90f3-0a6f83d4c072","order_by":4,"name":"Mahfuzur Rahman","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"West Virginia University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mahfuzur","middleName":"","lastName":"Rahman","suffix":""},{"id":591808076,"identity":"97b78c56-6dbb-4403-944a-828d75d35d6f","order_by":5,"name":"Tofazzal Islam","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tofazzal","middleName":"","lastName":"Islam","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-01-29 16:54:05","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8733903/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8733903/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":103049818,"identity":"325a1b76-e572-4809-b4e3-c1632f7db7ba","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-20 07:46:35","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":534903,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eDevelopment of blast disease symptoms on wheat rachis. Wheat rachis were inoculated with a conidial suspension of MoT (\u003cem\u003eMagnaporthe oryzae triticum\u003c/em\u003e) at a concentration of 4×10\u003csup\u003e5\u003c/sup\u003e conidia/mL. The inoculated rachis were then covered with a polyethylene bag for 48 hours to maintain high humidity. Disease symptom development was monitored, and photographs were captured 10 days post-inoculation. The arrow in the image indicates the area of infection caused by MoT.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8733903/v1/e83af3cbf5c8c230619c43c8.png"},{"id":102973891,"identity":"387e9907-ab94-4f8e-ae37-af76e4a50cdc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-19 07:07:08","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":137171,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e) hydrogen peroxide (H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e) content, (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e) malondialdehyde (MDA) content, (\u003cstrong\u003eC\u003c/strong\u003e) lipoxygenase (LOX) activity of the rachis at different hours after inoculation and (\u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e) the relative change of the prooxidants at 24 and 48 hai over control (0 h) in both wheat varietys.\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eBox and whisker represent descriptive summary of the data. Thickened horizontal line within the box indicate median of data. Different letter(s) denote a significant difference at \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.05. FW− Fresh weight. Additional details are shown in Table 1.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8733903/v1/9f3fb4051d47bdb07084f15c.png"},{"id":102973893,"identity":"1509d6cf-03a3-4aed-9b08-b17fff7cca0c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-19 07:07:08","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":146606,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e) chlorophyll \u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e, (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e) chlorophyll \u003cem\u003eb\u003c/em\u003e, (\u003cstrong\u003eC\u003c/strong\u003e) total chlorophyll, (\u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e) carotenoid contents of the rachis at different hours after inoculation and (\u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e) the relative change of the pigments at 24 and 48 hours after inoculation over control (0 h) in both wheat varietys.\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eBox and whisker represent descriptive summary of the data. Thickened horizontal line within the box indicate median of data. Different letter(s) denote a significant difference at \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.05. FW− Fresh weight. Additional details are shown in Table 1.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8733903/v1/8d9d89e2602d96da2aac95e3.png"},{"id":102973892,"identity":"2f5276d2-90bc-40df-9efe-b7bcd6bc1fe5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-19 07:07:08","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":192102,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e) proline content, and specific activities of (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e) SOD, (\u003cstrong\u003eC\u003c/strong\u003e) CAT, (\u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e) POD of the rachis at different hours after inoculation and (\u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e) the relative change of the antioxidants at 24 and 48 hours after inoculation over control (0 h) in both wheat varieties.\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eBox and whisker represent descriptive summary of the data. Thickened horizontal line within the box indicate median of data. Different letter(s) denote a significant difference at \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.05. FW− Fresh weight. Additional details are shown in Table 1.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8733903/v1/effbb9ec7b825419fbd2d710.png"},{"id":102973896,"identity":"f8b123d0-3dcc-4e78-90b7-3ecb2cc6322a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-19 07:07:08","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":296033,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSpecific activities of (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e) APX, (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e) GPX, (\u003cstrong\u003eC\u003c/strong\u003e) GR, (\u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e) DHAR, (\u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e) MDHAR, and (\u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e) GST of the rachis at different hours after inoculation and (\u003cstrong\u003eG\u003c/strong\u003e) the relative change of the antioxidants at 24 and 48 hours after inoculation over control (0 h) in both wheat varietys.\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eBox and whisker represent descriptive summary of the data. Thickened horizontal line within the box indicate median of data. Different letter(s) denote a significant difference at \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.05. Additional details are shown in Table 1.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8733903/v1/7110e2bdab333c81eb5b2c9b.png"},{"id":102973894,"identity":"9a8408ca-a8bd-4b6b-812f-b6e9ebb14a54","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-19 07:07:08","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":301948,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eHeatmap-cluster analysis (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e) and trait-by-variety PCA-biplot (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e) showed the genotypic performance at different hours after inoculation of MoT, classified treatment combinations and traits according to the relative contribution, and depicted correlation among the traits and variety-treatment combinations.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8733903/v1/1061a717486966dc4cc55d93.png"},{"id":103050979,"identity":"11b1030a-e4f2-498a-aa59-cdc4227a891f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-20 07:57:56","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2737351,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8733903/v1/244e2e43-391a-4da9-964c-6952a8088e63.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"The 2NS Chromosomal Translocation Enhances Redox Homeostasis and Mitigates Oxidative Stress during Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum Infection in Wheat","fulltext":[{"header":"Background","content":"\u003cp\u003eWheat (\u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e L.) is essential for global food security, accounting for approximately 20% of the caloric energy and 25% of dietary proteins consumed by humans worldwide. To meet the projected 60% increase in demand by 2050, wheat yields must rise sustainably amid escalating threats from climate change and emerging pathogens (USDA, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Among these threats, wheat blast caused by the hemibiotrophic fungus \u003cem\u003eMagnaporthe oryzae Triticum\u003c/em\u003e (MoT) stands out as a devastating disease. First reported in Brazil in 1985, wheat blast has since spread to many South American countries and recently to South Asia (Bangladesh, 2016) and Southern Africa (Zambia, 2020), causing yield losses of up to 100% under conducive conditions (Islam et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Tembo et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Its potential expansion into major wheat-producing regions like India and China, driven by climate variability and global trade, underscores the urgency of developing durable resistance strategies (Kamoun et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Using wheat crop simulation and newly developed wheat blast model, Pequeno et al. (2024) estimated that wheat blast can reduce global wheat production by 69\u0026nbsp;million tons per year (13% decrease) by mid-century. Genetic resources for wheat breeding and molecular mechanism of wheat-MoT interactions are scarcely available (Islam et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Bhattacharjee et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA critical line of defense lies in genetic resistance. The 2NS translocation, a chromosomal segment introgressed from the wild grass \u003cem\u003eAegilops ventricosa\u003c/em\u003e, has been widely deployed in wheat breeding since the 1990s for its broad-spectrum resistance to pests and diseases, including nematodes, rusts, and powdery mildew (Cruz et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Gao et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Recent studies suggest that 2NS also confers moderate resistance to wheat blast in field conditions (Cruz and Valent, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Islam et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). For instance, the Bangladeshi variety BARI Gom 33 (BG33), harbouring the 2NS segment, exhibits a considerable levels of blast resistance and terminal heat tolerance (Hossain et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Mohi-Ud-Din et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Stacking of a newly cloned blast-resistance gene, \u003cem\u003eRmg8\u003c/em\u003e into the 2NS background is thought to lead a durable blast-resistant wheat variety to combat fearsome wheat blast disease in Asia, Africa and South America (Asuke et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e; Islam and Azad \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). However, the molecular mechanisms underpinning 2NS-mediated blast resistance remain unresolved. Notably, while the translocation is known to carry uncharacterized resistance-associated genes (Kolmer et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e), its role in modulating host-pathogen interactions at the biochemical level, particularly during oxidative stress has not been explored.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlant defense against pathogens involves a tightly regulated oxidative burst, where reactive oxygen species (ROS) serve as dual-edged swords: they are critical for antimicrobial signaling and cell wall reinforcement but can trigger catastrophic oxidative damage if unchecked (Torres et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e; Mittler, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). To maintain redox homeostasis, plants deploy enzymatic antioxidants (e.g., superoxide dismutase [SOD], catalase [CAT], ascorbate peroxidase [APX]) and non-enzymatic compounds (e.g., proline, glutathione) to scavenge ROS and repair cellular damage (Mittler, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Hasanuzzaman et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). Proline, in particular, is a multifunctional osmolyte that stabilizes membranes, detoxifies methylglyoxal, and enhances antioxidant capacity under biotic and abiotic stress (Christgen and Becker, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Recent studies suggest that ROS management and antioxidant activity are pivotal in wheat blast resistance by the genotype S615 carrying \u003cem\u003eRmg8\u003c/em\u003e gene (Islam et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e), yet their role in 2NS-associated blast resistance remains unknown.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe hypothesize that the 2NS translocation enhances the antioxidant defense system in BG33, enabling it to mitigate oxidative stress and suppress MoT colonization. To test this, we (i) compare ROS accumulation and oxidative damage in resistant (BG33) and susceptible (BARI Gom 26, BG26) cultivars during MoT infection; (ii) quantify constitutive and induced activity of key enzymatic (SOD, CAT, APX, GPX, GR, DHAR, MDHAR, GST) and non-enzymatic (proline) antioxidants; and (iii) establish a mechanistic link between antioxidant efficiency and 2NS-mediated blast resistance. By elucidating how BG33\u0026rsquo;s redox machinery thwarts MoT, this study addresses a critical knowledge gap in wheat blast resistance and provides actionable insights for breeding climate-resilient, disease-tolerant wheat varieties.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMoT inoculation causes visible symptoms on wheat spike\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo assess the resistance of wheat to the wheat blast pathogen, we artificially inoculated wheat spikes of the varieties BG33 and BG26 at the flowering stage using a conidial suspension of \u003cem\u003eMagnaporthe oryzae triticum\u003c/em\u003e (MoT). Ten days post-inoculation, BG26 displayed clear symptoms of severe spike infection. In contrast, the rachis of the moderately to highly resistant variety BG33 showed only mild symptoms, characterized by partial bleaching and shrinkage of the upper section (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). These findings confirm that the experimental conditions and spike inoculation assay were suitable for studying reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and the responses of BG33, which carries the 2NS blast resistance chromosomal segment, to MoT infection through its antioxidant defense system.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eMoT inoculation induces differential oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation in wheat rachis\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo evaluate the induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and subsequent cellular damage during infection, we quantified hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), malondialdehyde (MDA) content, and lipoxygenase (LOX) activity in the rachis tissues of BG33 (resistant) and BG26 (susceptible) following inoculation with \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e conidia. While H₂O₂ acts as a vital signaling molecule under normal physiological conditions, its excessive accumulation is a hallmark of oxidative stress. Following \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e inoculation, a progressive increase in H₂O₂ levels was observed in both varieties (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA). However, the resistant variety, BG33, maintained significantly tighter control over ROS accumulation. At 24 hours after inoculation (hai), H₂O₂ content increased by only 6% in BG33 compared to 12% in BG26 relative to their respective untreated controls. This trend intensified by 48 hai, with H₂O₂ levels rising to 30% in BG26, while BG33 limited the increase to 19% (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eD). Untreated rachis tissues in both varieties maintained low baseline H₂O₂ concentrations, confirming that the observed oxidative surge was a direct response to fungal infection.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe extent of oxidative damage was further assessed through lipid peroxidation markers. \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e infection significantly enhanced the accumulation of MDA, a byproduct of polyunsaturated fatty acid oxidation. Throughout the infection period, BG33 consistently exhibited lower MDA levels than BG26 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eB). Specifically, at 24 hai, MDA levels rose by 45% in BG26 but only by 27% in BG33. By 48 hai, this disparity widened, with MDA levels escalating by 79% in the susceptible BG26 compared to 54% in the resistant BG33 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eD). Parallel to the MDA trends, \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e inoculation triggered a sharp rise in LOX activity, which facilitates the oxidation of lipids. At 24 hai, LOX activity increased by 116% in both genotypes relative to controls. However, by 48 hai, LOX activity escalated further to 158% in BG26, whereas BG33 showed a more tempered increase of 143% (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eC, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eD). Collectively, these results demonstrate that the resistant BG33 variety effectively mitigates \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e-induced oxidative stress and preserves membrane integrity more efficiently than the susceptible BG26.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eMoT inoculation impacts chlorophyll and carotenoid content in wheat rachis\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChlorophyll is the primary pigment driving photosynthesis and is essential for maintaining plant vigor and systemic resistance to pathogens. To evaluate the physiological impact of \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e infection, we quantified the levels of chlorophyll \u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e, chlorophyll \u003cem\u003eb\u003c/em\u003e, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids in the rachis of the resistant variety BG33 and the susceptible variety BG26 following inoculation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that while variety (G) and hours after inoculation (hai) had significant effects on pigment levels, the most pronounced declines were observed at 48 hai across both varieties (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). However, the degradation of photosynthetic pigments was notably more severe in the susceptible variety BG26 compared to the resistant variety BG33. At 24 hai, chlorophyll \u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e levels decreased by 22% in BG26, whereas BG33 restricted this loss to 14%. By 48 hai, this disparity widened significantly; chlorophyll \u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e levels plummeted by 55% in BG26 but only by 36% in BG33.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA similar trend was observed for chlorophyll \u003cem\u003eb\u003c/em\u003e and total chlorophyll content. Chlorophyll \u003cem\u003eb\u003c/em\u003e levels were reduced by 58% in BG26 at 48 hai, while BG33 maintained higher integrity with a 40% reduction. Total chlorophyll followed this pattern, showing a 56% decrease in BG26 compared to a more tempered 37% decline in BG33 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eC, E). Furthermore, \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e inoculation significantly depleted carotenoid levels\u0026mdash;pigments critical for mitigating photo-oxidative damage. [cite_start]At 24 hai, carotenoid content dropped by 20% in BG26 but only by 8% in BG33. This trend continued through 48 hai, with a 48% reduction in BG26 compared to a 26% reduction in BG33. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that the resistant variety BG33, which carries the 2NS chromosomal segment, exhibits superior preservation of photosynthetic pigments following \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e challenge. This ability to maintain pigment integrity likely supports the robust antioxidant defense system observed in BG33, contrasting with the rapid pigment degradation and subsequent oxidative vulnerability seen in the susceptible BG26.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eMoT inoculation differentially enhances proline accumulation in wheat rachis\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eProline is a multifunctional amino acid that plays a pivotal role in osmotic adjustment and ROS scavenging, particularly during the early stages of pathogen infection. To determine whether proline contributes to the 2NS-mediated resistance in BG33, we quantified its accumulation in the rachis of both BG33 and BG26 following \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e inoculation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eProline levels increased progressively in both varieties at 24 and 48 hours after inoculation (hai) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA). Notably, the resistant variety BG33 maintained significantly higher proline concentrations than the susceptible BG26 across all time points, including a higher constitutive (basal) level prior to inoculation. At 24 hai, proline content increased by 36% in BG33 compared to a 26% increase in BG26 relative to their respective untreated controls. This trend became more pronounced by 48 hai, with proline levels surging by 63% in BG33 and 56% in BG26 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eE). These results indicate that BG33 not only possesses a higher baseline of this protective osmolyte but also triggers a more robust proline-mediated response upon \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e challenge, likely contributing to its superior redox stability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eEnhanced antioxidant enzyme activities in the blast-resistant wheat variety carrying the 2NS chromosomal segment\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAntioxidant enzymes are fundamental to plant defense, providing a critical buffer against pathogen-induced oxidative bursts. To determine if the 2NS-mediated resistance in BG33 is linked to a more efficient enzymatic response, we assayed the activities of major antioxidant enzymes in the rachis tissues of both resistant (BG33) and susceptible (BG26) varieties following \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e inoculation. Our results indicate that BG33 maintains a significantly more robust and sustained antioxidant enzymatic profile compared to BG26 (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUpon \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e challenge, both varieties exhibited an upward trend in primary antioxidant defense enzyme activities. However, the induction was consistently more pronounced in the resistant BG33. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, which catalyzes the first step of ROS detoxification, rose by 23% in BG33 at 48 hours after inoculation (hai), compared to a more modest 15% increase in BG26 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eB, E). Even more striking differences were observed in hydrogen peroxide-scavenging enzymes. Catalase (CAT) activity in BG33 surged by 46% at 48 hai, more than double the 17% increase observed in BG26 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eC, E). Similarly, peroxidase (POD) activity showed a sharp differential response; while BG26 reached a 36% increase at 48 hai, BG33 exhibited a substantial 68% rise, nearly doubling the activity of the susceptible variety (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eD, E).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe AsA\u0026ndash;GSH cycle is vital for maintaining cellular redox homeostasis. We observed significant upregulation across all enzymes in this pathway including ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), glutathione reductase (GR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), and monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR) with BG33 consistently outperforming BG26.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAt 48 hai, APX and GPX activities in BG33 rose by 66% and 41%, respectively, significantly higher than the 55% and 23% increases seen in BG26 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eA, B, G). The recycling enzymes of the cycle also showed superior efficiency in the resistant variety; GR and MDHAR activities in BG33 reached increases of 58% and 31%, respectively, compared to 44% and 12% in BG26 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eC, E, G). Notably, DHAR activity in BG26 showed a sharp decline in induction between 24 and 48 hai (dropping from 13% to 5%), whereas BG33 maintained a high induction of 31%, suggesting a sustained capacity for ascorbate regeneration in the resistant variety. Finally, glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity, which facilitates the detoxification of lipid hydroperoxides, was enhanced by 31% in BG33 at 48 hai, nearly twice the induction level of 16% observed in BG26 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eF, G). Collectively, these data demonstrate that the 2NS translocation in BG33 confers resistance by priming a broad-spectrum and highly vigorous antioxidant enzymatic network.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eInfluence of variety and post-inoculation time on physiological and biochemical parameters\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo validate the observed physiological changes, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to evaluate the influence of variety (G), hours after inoculation (H), and their interaction (G\u0026times;H) on the measured parameters (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).The analysis revealed that the variety (G) had a significant main effect (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) on nearly all parameters examined, with the exception of chlorophyll \u003cem\u003eb\u003c/em\u003e (Chl \u003cem\u003eb\u003c/em\u003e) and carotenoids (Caro), indicating that the genetic background (2NS vs. non-2NS) is a primary determinant of the wheat's physiological state. Furthermore, the duration of infection (hai) demonstrated a highly significant effect (\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003ep\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.01\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e) on every parameter, confirming a dynamic physiological shift over the course of the \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e challenge. Notably, significant interaction effects between variety and time (G\u0026times;H) were observed for the majority of the biochemical markers, including ROS accumulation and antioxidant enzyme activities. However, no significant G\u0026times;H interaction was found for leaf pigments and proline content (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e), suggesting that while these specific parameters were significantly affected by both variety and time independently, their rate of change followed a similar trend in both genotypes post-inoculation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVariance components of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and their significance level of studied traits using the general linear model\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTrait\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVariety (G)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ehai (H)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eG\u0026times;H\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eResidual\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDF\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eH\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.705\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.057\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.261\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.059\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMDA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e53.104\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e581.588\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e19.168\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.447\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLOX\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.451\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.227\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.106\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.011\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChl \u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.015\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.016467\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.0002\u003csup\u003ens\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.00043\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChl \u003cem\u003eb\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.000417\u003csup\u003ens\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.004517\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.000317\u003csup\u003ens\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.000147\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTChl\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.01000\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.03750\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.00113\u003csup\u003ens\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.00091\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCaro\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.0000667\u003csup\u003ens\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.0026792\u003csup\u003e***\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.0003792\u003csup\u003ens\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.0001083\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProline\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e27.714\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15.366\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.779\u003csup\u003ens\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.293\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSOD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e567.648\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2147.051\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e332.778\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.641\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCAT\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4737.66\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e866.552\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e263.981\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17.551\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePOD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.269\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.093\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.018\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.002\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAPX\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.832\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.957\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.173\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.024\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGPX\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4243.232\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3978.647\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e450.344\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e33.782\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36.605\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e773.906\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13.305\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.299\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDHAR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e267.534\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2668.343\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e663.226\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e29.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMDHAR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e301.467\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1639.949\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e328.472\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42.499\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGST\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14818.055\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15375.623\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1641.025\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e64.282\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ehai\u0026minus; hours after inoculation, DF\u0026minus; degrees of freedom, Chl \u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u0026minus; chlorophyll \u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e, Chl \u003cem\u003eb\u003c/em\u003e\u0026minus; chlorophyll \u003cem\u003eb\u003c/em\u003e, TChl\u0026minus; total chlorophyll, Caro\u0026minus; carotenoids, H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026minus; hydrogen peroxide, MDA\u0026minus; malondialdehyde, LOX\u0026minus; lipoxygenase, SOD\u0026minus; superoxide dismutase, CAT\u0026minus; catalase, POD\u0026minus; peroxidase, GPX\u0026minus; glutathione peroxidase, GST\u0026minus; glutathione-S-transferase, APX\u0026minus; ascorbate peroxidase, GR\u0026minus; glutathione reductase, DHAR\u0026minus; dehydroascorbate reductase, MDHAR\u0026minus; monodehydroascorbate reductase. \u003csup\u003ens\u003c/sup\u003e, \u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003e, and \u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e indicate statistically non-significant, significant at \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05, and 0.01, respectively.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eMoT resistance in wheat rachis: A multifaceted defense\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo integrate the physiological and biochemical responses observed, a comparative heatmap analysis was performed. The analysis categorized the evaluated traits into three distinct functional clusters: prooxidants and markers of oxidative damage (Cluster I), photosynthetic pigments (Cluster II), and antioxidant enzymes alongside the osmoprotectant proline (Cluster III) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e). Under control conditions, both BG26 and BG33 exhibited similar pigment profiles and biochemical baselines, clustering closely together. However, following \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e inoculation, the two varieties diverged significantly, reflecting their contrasting strategies for managing infection-induced oxidative stress.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe superior resistance to \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e in BG33 appears to be derived from a coordinated, multifaceted defense mechanism. Unlike the susceptible BG26, the resistant variety BG33 effectively restricted the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in significantly lower levels of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), malondialdehyde (MDA), and lipoxygenase (LOX) activity post-inoculation. This mitigation of oxidative damage was strongly associated with the robust upregulation of Cluster III components. BG33 maintained substantially higher activities of key antioxidant enzymes and accumulated greater levels of proline, which likely served as both a ROS scavenger and a vital osmoprotectant. Collectively, these findings suggest that the 2NS chromosomal segment in BG33 confers resistance by \"priming\" a more resilient antioxidant network, which preserves cellular integrity and limits the physiological impact of wheat blast infection.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003ePlant resistance to pathogens involves complex metabolic recalibrations centered largely on the activation of robust antioxidant systems to maintain cellular homeostasis. This study reveals that the wheat blast-resistant variety BARI Gom 33 (BG33), which carries the 2NS chromosomal translocation, exhibits a significantly more vigorous antioxidant defense network against \u003cem\u003eM. oryzae Triticum\u003c/em\u003e (MoT) than the susceptible variety BARI Gom 26 (BG26). Our findings establish a clear mechanistic link between 2NS-mediated resistance and superior redox management. By effectively neutralizing the oxidative burst during infection, BG33 preserves cellular integrity and restricts fungal colonization, providing a physiological explanation for the lower blast severity previously documented in the rachis of this variety (Hossain et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). While antioxidant activation was recently linked to the \u003cem\u003eRmg8\u003c/em\u003e gene, our work extends this paradigm to the widely utilized 2NS segment, demonstrating its fundamental role in biochemical defense (Islam et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA critical observation in this study is that BG33 accumulated 40\u0026ndash;60% less reactive oxygen species (ROS), specifically hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and malondialdehyde (MDA), following \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e challenge compared to BG26. This reduction indicates minimal lipid peroxidation and superior membrane stability. Notably, the 2NS translocation appears to \"prime\" BG33 for a rapid ROS detoxification response, a capacity that is strikingly weak in BG26 suggesting that the 2NS segment confers a form of preemptive stress adaptation. Furthermore, BG33 maintained 30\u0026ndash;50% higher levels of chlorophyll and carotenoids post-infection, mitigating the photo-oxidative damage that typically accompanies the hemibiotrophic invasion of \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e. The\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003edecline in chlorophyll content observed during MoT infection in this study is consistent with earlier reports from various plant-pathogen interactions. Similar reductions have been documented in Brassica species infected with \u003cem\u003eAlternaria\u003c/em\u003e spp. (Munir et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) and \u003cem\u003eAlternaria brassicicola\u003c/em\u003e (Macioszek et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), in eggplant affected by leaf spot-associated pathogenic fungi (Kaniyassery et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e), and in wheat challenged by \u003cem\u003ePyricularia oryzae\u003c/em\u003e (Debona et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e) particularly during the early stages of infection, such as 48 hours post-inoculation. The preservation of carotenoids, which are vital for quenching singlet oxygen, points to a synergistic relationship between enzymatic antioxidants and pigment-based chemical defenses. In contrast, the rapid pigment degradation in BG26 likely exacerbated ROS accumulation, mirroring the physiological collapse seen in other susceptible cereal-pathogen interactions (Chrpov\u0026aacute; et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe role of proline as a multifaceted metabolic sentinel is also highlighted by our data, as BG33 exhibited constitutive proline levels 2.1-fold higher than BG26, which surged further upon infection. Beyond its role as an osmoprotectant, proline may participate in reactive nitrogen species (RNS) signaling to enhance pathogen defense (Christgen \u0026amp; Becker, 2021), positioning it as a key metabolite in the 2NS-mediated resistance framework. Our analysis of the enzymatic landscape further revealed that primary scavengers, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) exhibited 1.5- to 2.5-fold higher activity in BG33. The rapid conversion of superoxide anions to H₂O₂ by SOD, followed by efficient neutralization by CAT and APX, suggests a highly synchronized ROS-scavenging cascade. Interestingly, GST activity in BG33 exceeded that of BG26 by 80%, a trend reminiscent of \u003cem\u003eFhb7\u003c/em\u003e-mediated resistance to Fusarium head blight (Wang et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). These enzymes may also play a specialized role in detoxifying \u003cem\u003eMoT\u003c/em\u003e-derived phytotoxins, a hypothesis that warrants further investigation through toxin-profiling experiments.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe ascorbate-glutathione (AsA-GSH) cycle emerged as a \"hyperactive\" engine of resistance in BG33. While BG33 increased the activities of APX, GR, MDHAR, and DHAR by up to 2.2-fold post-infection, BG26 showed a suppression of these enzymes, likely leading to the depletion of the protective AsA/GSH pool. This sustained recycling capacity is a hallmark of durable resistance, ensuring that the plant can withstand prolonged oxidative pressure. While the 2NS segment is a known driver of heat tolerance (Mohi-Ud-Din et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e), this study is the first to explicitly link it to antioxidant-mediated resistance against wheat blast. This functional overlap between abiotic and biotic stress pathways underscores the evolutionary versatility of the 2NS translocation, suggesting it harbors regulatory elements that broaden the expression of antioxidant gene families.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur findings establish the 2NS translocation as a master regulator of oxidative stress management, providing a \"dual-defense\" strategy against both fungal pathogens and environmental stressors. To build upon this mechanistic framework, future research should prioritize the genetic dissection of the 2NS segment using CRISPR-based approaches to clone specific genes that modulate these antioxidant pathways (Islam \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Khayer et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2026\u003c/span\u003e). Additionally, assessing the stability of these traits across diverse agroclimatic zones and investigating the crosstalk between physiological antioxidant pathways and classical \u003cem\u003eR-gene\u003c/em\u003e signaling will be essential for developing \"stacked\" resistance models. By shifting the breeding focus toward enhancing antioxidant capacity alongside vertical resistance, this study contributes a sustainable and robust strategy for safeguarding global wheat production against the escalating threat of wheat blast.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study provides comprehensive evidence that the 2NS chromosomal translocation in the wheat variety BARI Gom 33 (BG33) confers resistance to \u003cem\u003eM. oryzae Triticum\u003c/em\u003e (MoT) by activating a sophisticated and multi-tiered antioxidant defense system. Unlike the susceptible variety BARI Gom 26 (BG26), BG33 effectively mitigates infection-induced oxidative stress by maintaining significantly lower levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxidation markers. This physiological resilience is driven by the robust upregulation of key enzymatic antioxidants including SOD, CAT, and POD alongside a highly efficient ascorbate-glutathione (AsA-GSH) cycle. Furthermore, the elevated accumulation of proline and the superior preservation of photosynthetic pigments in BG33 suggest a coordinated mechanism that protects cellular integrity and maintains metabolic vigor under pathogen pressure. These findings establish the 2NS segment as a critical genetic resource not only for blast resistance but also for enhancing redox homeostasis in wheat. Future research should prioritize the identification and cloning of the specific regulatory genes within the 2NS segment that modulate these antioxidant pathways. Elucidating these molecular foundations will be instrumental in developing more resilient, high-yielding wheat varieties capable of withstanding the increasing global threat of wheat blast.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePlant Materials and MoT Isolate\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWheat seeds of cultivars BARI Gom 26 (BG26) and BARI Gom 33 (BG33) were procured from the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, Bangladesh. A randomized complete block design with four replications was employed for field sowing in late November at the research field of Gazipur Agricultural University (GAU), Gazipur, Bangladesh.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe wheat blast isolate BTJP 4\u0026ndash;5, obtained from the Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (IBGE) at GAU, was reactivated from \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;80\u0026deg;C storage on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium for subsequent experimentation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePreparation of MoT Inoculum and Inoculation Assay\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoT conidia were obtained as described by Gupta et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Briefly, mycelium blocks were cultured on PDA amended with 0.05 g/L phenoxymethylpenicillin at 25\u0026deg;C for 8 days in the dark. Subsequent incubation under blue light for 48 hours induced sporulation. Conidia were harvested by gently scraping the plates with a paintbrush while flooded with 0.01% Tween 20 in sterile water. The suspension was filtered through cheesecloth and adjusted to a concentration of 1 \u0026times; 10⁵ conidia/mL.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWheat plants were thoroughly sprayed with the conidial suspension, while controls received a sterile water-Tween 20 solution. High humidity (80\u0026ndash;100%) was maintained for 48 hours by covering the plants with sterilized polyethylene. Plants were incubated at 25\u0026ndash;30\u0026deg;C to facilitate blast symptom development. Infected spikes were collected at 0-, 24-, and 48-hours post-inoculation. Spikelets were removed, and the rachis was sectioned, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80\u0026deg;C for subsequent analyses.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDetermination of photosynthetic pigments and osmolyte proline\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFresh plant samples (approximately 100 mg) were extracted with 5 mL of 80% acetone in glass vials. The vials were stored at 4\u0026deg;C in the dark for 24 hours. Subsequently, absorbance was measured at 663 nm, 646 nm, and 470 nm. Chlorophyll \u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e (Chl \u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e), Chlorophyll \u003cem\u003eb\u003c/em\u003e (Chl \u003cem\u003eb\u003c/em\u003e), total chlorophyll (TChl), and carotenoid content were quantified using the formulas of Arnon (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1949\u003c/span\u003e) and expressed as mg g⁻\u0026sup1; fresh weight (FW). Proline content in the rachis was determined according to the method of Bates et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1973\u003c/span\u003e) and expressed as \u0026micro;mol g⁻\u0026sup1; FW.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDetermination of H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e and MDA content\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eHydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) levels were quantified using the method described by Yu et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR74\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e). The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 410 nm using a spectrophotometer. H₂O₂ content was calculated using an extinction coefficient of 0.28 \u0026micro;M⁻\u0026sup1; cm⁻\u0026sup1; and expressed as \u0026micro;mol g⁻\u0026sup1; fresh weight (FW).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMembrane lipid peroxidation, assessed by malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, was determined using the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) method of Heath and Packer (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1968\u003c/span\u003e). MDA concentration was calculated using an extinction coefficient of 155 mM⁻\u0026sup1; cm⁻\u0026sup1; and expressed as nmol g⁻\u0026sup1; FW.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eExtraction of Enzymes and Soluble Proteins, and Measurement of Enzymatic Activity\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlant tissue samples (1 g each) were meticulously homogenized in an ice-cold extraction buffer. This buffer, a carefully formulated solution of 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0), incorporated 100 mM KCl to maintain ionic balance, 1 mM ascorbate to protect against oxidation, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol to preserve thiol groups, and 10% (\u003cem\u003ew\u003c/em\u003e/\u003cem\u003ev\u003c/em\u003e) glycerol to prevent enzyme denaturation. The resulting homogenates were then subjected to centrifugation at 11,500\u0026times;\u003cem\u003eg\u003c/em\u003e for 12 minutes, effectively separating the cellular debris from the soluble protein fraction. The supernatant, enriched with the enzymes of interest, was carefully collected for subsequent enzymatic activity assays.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo quantify the total protein content in the enzyme extracts, the Bradford method was employed, a well-established colorimetric technique (Bradford, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1976\u003c/span\u003e). This method relies on the binding of Coomassie Brilliant Blue dye to proteins, resulting in a shift in the dye's absorption spectrum, allowing for a sensitive and accurate determination of protein concentration.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe activity of key antioxidant enzymes was then meticulously measured. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, crucial for neutralizing superoxide radicals, was determined using the xanthine-xanthine oxidase system, following the established protocol of Spitz and Oberley (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1989\u003c/span\u003e). Lipoxygenase (LOX) activity, involved in fatty acid oxidation, was measured according to the method of Doderer et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e), utilizing linoleic acid as the substrate. Catalase (CAT) activity, responsible for decomposing hydrogen peroxide, was assessed as described by Noctor et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e), with the reaction initiated by the addition of the enzyme extract and activity calculated based on the characteristic absorption of the reaction product.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePeroxidase (POD) activity, another key enzyme in the antioxidant defense system, was determined using the established method of Castillo et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1984\u003c/span\u003e). The activity of glutathione peroxidase (GPX), an essential enzyme for reducing hydrogen peroxide, was measured using H₂O₂ as the substrate, following the protocol of Elia et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurthermore, the activities of several other crucial antioxidant enzymes were spectrophotometrically determined according to the established protocol of Hasanuzzaman et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e). These enzymes included glutathione S-transferase (GST), involved in detoxification processes, glutathione reductase (GR) essential for maintaining the reduced form of glutathione, ascorbate peroxidase (APX) crucial for scavenging hydrogen peroxide, monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR) involved in recycling ascorbate, and dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) also essential for ascorbate regeneration.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eData analysis was conducted using a linear model within an R-4.1.0 for Windows environment (R Core Team, 2013) framework for a factorial randomized complete block design. Statistical analyses, including two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and subsequent mean comparisons using Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test, were performed with the aid of R packages: ggplot2, ggthemes, multcompView, dplyr, stats, and patchwork (Wickham, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR72\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). Boxplots were generated using these packages to visually represent the data distribution. Mean differences were considered statistically significant at a significance level of \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05. Furthermore, a heatmap was created using the R package pheatmap (Kolde, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) to visualize the relationships between variables.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":"\u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionList\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eAPX\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAscorbate peroxidase\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eBARI\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBangladesh Agricultural Research Institute\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eCAT\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCatalase\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eGPX\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlutathione peroxidase\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eGST\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlutathione-S-transferase\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eLOX\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLipoxygenase\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eMDA\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMalondialdehyde\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eMoT\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eMagnaporthe oryzae Triticum\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003ePOD\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePeroxidase\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eROS\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReactive Oxygen Species\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor contributions statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eM.S.I., M.M. and D.R.G. conducted the experiments, curated the data, performed data analysis, and wrote the first draft. T.I., D.R.G and M.M. contributed to experimental design and editing; T.I., and D.R.G. supervised the research and edited the manuscript. D.R.G., M.S.I., M.M.R. and M.M. contributed to biochemical analysis. T.I. conceptualized the idea, supervised experiments, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. M.R. reviewed and edited the manuscript\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDeclaration of competing interest\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no conflict of interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors are thankful to the Research Management Wing of Gazipur Agricultural University, Bangladesh and Krishi Gobeshona Foundation of Bangladesh for funding to this research project.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAfzal F, Rabia Khurshid, Muhammad Ashraf, Alvina Gul Kazi. Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidants in Response to Pathogens and Wounding, Edi: Parvaiz Ahmad In: Oxidative Damage to Plants. Academic Press, 2014,Pages 397-424.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eApel, K., and Hirt, H. 2004. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55: 373-399. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eArnon, D. 1949. Copper enzymes isolated chloroplasts, polyphenol oxidase in \u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e. Plant. Physiol. 24, 1\u0026ndash;15.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAsuke, S., Morita, K., Shimizu, M., Abe, F., Terauchi, R., Nago, C., Takahashi, Y., Shibata, M., Yoshioka, M., Iwakawa, M., et al. 2024. Evolution of wheat blast resistance gene Rmg8 accompanied by differentiation of variants recognizing the powdery mildew fungus. Nat. Plants 10:971-983. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-024-01711-1. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBariana HS, McIntosh RA (1994) Characterisation and origin of rust and powdery mildew resistance genes in VPM1 wheat. Euphytica 76:53\u0026ndash;61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024020\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teari, D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant. Soil 39, 205\u0026ndash;207.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBauriegel, E., Giebel, A. and Herppich, W.B., 2010. Rapid \u003cem\u003eFusarium\u003c/em\u003e head blight detection on winter wheat ears using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual, 83(2), pp.196-203.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBhattacharjee, P., Ali, J., Islam, T. 2025. Management of wheat blast disease in Bangladesh caused by \u003cem\u003eMagnaporthe oryzae\u003c/em\u003e pathotype \u003cem\u003eTriticum\u003c/em\u003e. Plant Health Cases, phcs20250025. https://doi.org/10.1079/planthealthcases.2025.0025 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical biochemistry, 72(1-2): 248-254. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCastillo, F.I.; Penel, I.; Greppin, H. 1984. Peroxidase release induced by ozone in \u003cem\u003eSedum album\u003c/em\u003e leaves. Plant. Physiol. 74, 846\u0026ndash;851.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCecchini, N. M., Monteoliva, M. I., and Alvarez, M. E. (2011). Proline dehydrogenase contributes to pathogen defense in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 155, 1947\u0026ndash;1959. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.167163\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChen S, Zhang W, Bolus S, Rouse MN, Dubcovsky J (2018) Identification and characterization of wheat stem rust resistance gene Sr21 effective against the Ug99 race group at high temperature. PLoS Genet 14(4): e1007287.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChen, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, C., L\u0026uuml;, W., Jin, J. B., and Hua, X. (2011). Proline induces calcium-mediated oxidative burst and salicylic acid signaling. Amino Acids 40, 1473\u0026ndash;1484. doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0757-2\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChristgen SL, Becker DF. 2019. Role of proline in pathogen and host interactions. Antioxid Redox Signal. 30(4):683-709. doi:10.1089/ars.2017.7335\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChrpov\u0026aacute;, J., Ors\u0026aacute;k, M., Martinek, P., Lachman, J., \u0026amp; Tr\u0026aacute;vn\u0026iacute;čkov\u0026aacute;, M. 2021. Potential role and involvement of antioxidants and other secondary metabolites of wheat in the infection process and resistance to \u003cem\u003eFusarium\u003c/em\u003e spp. Agronomy, 11(11), 2235.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCruz C. D., Peterson G. L., Bockus W. W., Kankanala P., Dubcovsky J., Jordan K., et al. (2016). The 2NS translocation from \u003cem\u003eAegilops ventricosa\u003c/em\u003e confers resistance to the \u003cem\u003eTriticum\u003c/em\u003e pathotype of \u003cem\u003eMagnaporthe oryzae\u003c/em\u003e. Crop Sci. 56 990\u0026ndash;1000. 10.2135/cropsci2015.07.0410\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCruz CD, Valent B (2017) Wheat blast disease: danger on the move. Trop Plant Pathol 42:210\u0026ndash;222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-017-0159-z \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDebona, D., Rodrigues, F.\u0026Aacute;., Rios, J.A. and Nascimento, K.J.T., 2012. Biochemical changes in the leaves of wheat plants infected by \u003cem\u003ePyricularia oryzae\u003c/em\u003e. Phytopathology, 102(12), pp.1121-1129.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDebona, D., Rios, J. A., Nascimento, K. J. T., Silva, L. C. and Rodrigues, F. A. 2016. Influence of magnesium on physiological responses of wheat infected by \u003cem\u003ePyricularia oryzae\u003c/em\u003e. Plant Pathol. 65: 114-123. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12390\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDoderer A, Kokkelink I, van der Veen S, Valk BE, Schram AW, Douma AC. 1992. Purification and characterization of two lipoxygenase isoenzymes from germinating barley. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1120:97\u0026ndash;104. 10.1016/0167-4838(92)90429-H\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEhsani-Moghaddam B, Charles MT, Carisse O, Khanizadeh S (2006) Superoxide dismutase responses of strawberry cultivars to infection by \u003cem\u003eMycosphaerella fragariae\u003c/em\u003e. Journal of Plant Physiology 163:147\u0026ndash;153\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEl-Komy, M.H., Saleh, A.A., Ibrahim, Y.E. et al. Early production of reactive oxygen species coupled with an efficient antioxidant system play a role in potato resistance to late blight. Trop. plant pathol. 45, 44\u0026ndash;55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-019-00318-8\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eElia, A.C.; Galarini, R.; Taticchi, M.I.; D\u0026ouml;rr, A.J.; Mantilacci, L. 2003. Antioxidant responses and bioaccumulation in \u003cem\u003eIctalurus melas\u003c/em\u003e under mercury exposure. Ecotoxicol. Env. Saf. 55, 162\u0026ndash;167.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGao L, Koo DH, Juliana P (2021) The \u003cem\u003eAegilops ventricosa 2N\u003csup\u003ev\u003c/sup\u003eS\u003c/em\u003e segment in bread wheat: cytology, genomics and breeding. Theor Appl Genet 134:529\u0026ndash;542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-020-03712-y\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGhosh TK, Tompa NH, Rahman MM, Mohi-Ud-Din M, Al-Meraj SMZ, Biswas MS, Mostofa MG. 2021. Acclimation of liverwort \u003cem\u003eMarchantia polymorpha\u003c/em\u003e to physiological drought reveals important roles of antioxidant enzymes, proline and abscisic acid in land plant adaptation to osmotic stress. PeerJ 9: e12419. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12419. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGill, S.S. and Tuteja, N. 2010. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant physiology and Biochemistry, 48(12), 909-930.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGupta DR, Surovy MZ, Mahmud NU, Chakraborty M, et al. 2020. Suitable methods for isolation, culture, storage and identification of wheat blast fungus \u003cem\u003eMagnaporthe oryzae Triticum\u003c/em\u003e pathotype. Phytopathology Research. 2:30.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHasanuzzaman, M.; Alam, M.M.; Rahman, A.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Fujita, M. 2014. Exogenous proline and glycine betaine mediated upregulation of antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems provides better protection against salt-induced oxidative stress in two rice (\u003cem\u003eOryza sativa\u003c/em\u003e L.) varieties. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 757219.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHasanuzzaman M., Mahmud J.A., Anee T.I., Nahar K., Islam M.T. Drought stress tolerance in wheat: Omics approaches in understanding and enhancing antioxidant defense. In: Zargar S.M., Zargar M.Y., editors. Abiotic Stress-Mediated Sensing and Signaling in Plants: An Omics Perspective. Springer; Singapore: 2018. 267\u0026ndash;307.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHeath, R.L.; Packer, L. 1968. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplast: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 125, 189\u0026ndash;198. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHemetsberger C, Herrberger C, Zechmann B, Hillmer M, Doehlemann G (2012) The Ustilago maydis Effector Pep1 Suppresses Plant Immunity by Inhibition of Host Peroxidase Activity. PLoS Pathog 8(5): e1002684.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHossain A., Mottaleb K. A., Farhad M., Barma N. C. (2019). Mitigating the twin problems of malnutrition and wheat blast by one wheat variety, \u0026ldquo;BARI Gom 33\u0026rdquo;, in Bangladesh. Acta Agrobot. 72:1775. 10.5586/aa.1775\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIslam T (2019) CRISPR-Cas technology in modifying food crops. CAB Rev 14: 50.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIslam, M. T., Croll, D., Gladieux, P., Soanes, D. M., Persoons, A., Bhattacharjee, P., et al., 2016. Emergence of wheat blast in Bangladesh was caused by a South American lineage of \u003cem\u003eMagnaporthe oryzae\u003c/em\u003e. BMC biology, 14(1): 84. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIslam, M.T., Gupta, D.R., Hossain, A., Roy, K.K., He, X., Kabir, M.R., Singh, P.K., Khan, M.A.R., Rahman, M. and Wang, G.L., 2020. Wheat blast: a new threat to food security. Phytopathology Research, 2(1), 1-13.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIslam, T., and Azad, R. B. 2024. \u003cem\u003eRmg8\u003c/em\u003e gene against wheat blast. Nat. Plants 10:836\u0026ndash;837. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01690-3\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIslam, M. S., Mohi-Ud-Din, M., Gupta, D.R., Rahman, M.M., Ghosh, T.K., Rahman, M., Islam, T. 2025. Wheat Genotype S615 carrying the \u003cem\u003eRmg8\u003c/em\u003e gene Exhibits enhanced antioxidant defense for resistance to \u003cem\u003eMagnaporthe oryzae Triticum\u003c/em\u003e. Phytopathology, Published Online: 10 Sep 2025 https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-06-25-0206-R\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJuliana P, He X, Kabir MR, Roy KK, Anwar MB, Marza F, Poland J, Shrestha S, Singh RP, Singh PK. Genome-wide association mapping for wheat blast resistance in CIMMYT\u0026apos;s international screening nurseries evaluated in Bolivia and Bangladesh. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 2;10(1):15972.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKamoun S, Talbot NJ, Islam MT (2019) Plant health emergencies demand open science: Tackling a cereal killer on the run. PLoS Biol 17(6): e3000302. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000302\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKaniyassery, A., Hegde, M., Sathish, S. B., Thorat, S. A., Udupa, S., Murali, T. S., Muthusamy, A. 2024. Leaf spot-associated pathogenic fungi alter photosynthetic, biochemical, and metabolic responses in eggplant during the early stages of infection. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 133, 102320, doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2024.102320\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKhayer, A., Ye, P., Eti, F.S. et al. Field pathogenomics and evolutionary conservation unveil CRISPR-targetable susceptibility genes for wheat blast resistance. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36547-6\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKidwai, M., Ahmad, I.Z. \u0026amp; Chakrabarty, D. Class III peroxidase: an indispensable enzyme for biotic/abiotic stress tolerance and a potent candidate for crop improvement. Plant Cell Rep 39, 1381\u0026ndash;1393 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-020-02588-y\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKo\u0026ccedil; E, Ayşen S\u0026uuml;l\u0026uuml;n \u0026Uuml;st\u0026uuml;n, Cemil İşlek, Yeliz Kaşko Arıcı. Defence responses in leaves of resistant and susceptible pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars infected with different inoculum concentrations of \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora capsici\u003c/em\u003e Leon. Scientia Horticulturae, Volume 128, Issue 4, 2011,Pages 434-442.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKolde R 2019: pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. \u003cem\u003eR package version 1.0.12\u003c/em\u003e. Avaiable online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/pheatmap.pdf (accessed on 5 September 2021).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKolmer JA, Jin Y, Long DL (2007) Wheat leaf and stem rust in the United states. Aust J Agric Res 58: 631-638.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKuźniak, E., Kopczewski, T., Chojak-Koźniewska, J. (2017). Ascorbate-Glutathione Cycle and Biotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. In: Hossain, M., Munn\u0026eacute;-Bosch, S., Burritt, D., Diaz-Vivancos, P., Fujita, M., Lorence, A. (eds) Ascorbic Acid in Plant Growth, Development and Stress Tolerance. Springer, Cham.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi, L., Zhu, F., Liu, H., Chu, A., and Lo, C. (2013). Isolation and expression analysis of defense-related genes in sorghum - \u003cem\u003eColletotrichum sublineolum\u003c/em\u003e interaction. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 84, 123\u0026ndash;130. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2013.08.005\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi, ZX., Lan, JB., Liu, YQ, Qi L-W, Tang J-M. 2020. Investigation of the role of AcTPR2 in kiwifruit and its response to Botrytis cinerea infection. BMC Plant Biol 20, 557. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02773-x\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMacioszek, V. K. Gapińska, M., Zmienko, A., Sobczak, M., Skoczowski, A. Oliwa, J., Kononowicz, A. K. 2020. Complexity of \u003cem\u003eBrassica oleracea\u0026ndash;Alternaria brassicicola\u003c/em\u003e susceptible interaction reveals downregulation of photosynthesis at ultrastructural, transcriptional, and physiological levels. Cells, 9 (10), p. 2329, doi: 10.3390/cells9102329\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMittler R. 2017. ROS are good. Trends Plant Sci. 22(1), 11-19.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMohi-Ud-Din M\u003c/strong\u003e, Rohman MM, Alam MA, Hasanuzzaman M, Islam T (2022) Wheat variety carrying \u003cem\u003e2N\u003csup\u003ev\u003c/sup\u003eS\u003c/em\u003e chromosomal segment provides yield advantage through lowering terminal heat\u0026ndash;induced oxidative stress. \u003cem\u003eProtoplasma\u003c/em\u003e (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-022-01759-w\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMohi-Ud-Din M\u003c/strong\u003e, Siddiqui N, Rohman M, Jagadish SVK, Ahmed JU, Hassan MM, Hossain A, Islam T (2021) Physiological and Biochemical Dissection Reveals a Trade-Off between Antioxidant Capacity and Heat Tolerance in Bread Wheat (\u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e L.). \u003cem\u003eAntioxidants 10\u003c/em\u003e, 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10030351\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMohi-Ud-Din, M., Hossain, M. A., Rohman, M. M., Uddin, M. N., Haque, M. S., Tahery, M. H., \u0026amp; Hasanuzzaman, M. (2025). Multi-Trait Index-Based Selection of Drought Tolerant Wheat: Physiological and Biochemical Profiling. \u003cem\u003ePlants\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e14\u003c/em\u003e(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14010035\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMunir, S., Shahzad, A. N., Qureshi, M. K. 2020. Acuities into tolerance mechanisms via different bioassay during Brassicaceae-\u003cem\u003eAlternaria brassicicola\u003c/em\u003e interaction and its impact on yield. PLoS One 15 (12), e0242545, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242545\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNiu C, Wenjun W, Haiqin Y, Zhourui L, Pengyan Z, Xiaoping L. 2023. Ascorbate\u0026minus;glutathione cycle involving in response of \u003cem\u003eBangia fuscopurpurea\u003c/em\u003e (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) to hyposalinity. Frontiers in Marine Science. 10\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNoctor, G.; Mhamdi, A.; Foyer, C.H. 2016. Oxidative stress and antioxidative systems: Recipes for successful data collection and interpretation. Plant, Cell \u0026amp; Environ. 39, 1140\u0026ndash;1160.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOsei, Solomon Boamah, Thomas Afriyie Boakye, Lijuan Wei, Mengjun Jin, Kwadwo Gyasi Santo, Isaac Takyi, Chengde Yang. 2023. In vitro application of proline in potato tubers under newly emerging bacteria \u003cem\u003eLelliottia amnigena\u003c/em\u003e infection. Microbial Pathogenesis, 178, 106053.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eQamer Z., Chaudhary M.T., Du, X., Hinze L, \u0026amp; Azhar M T. 2021. Review of oxidative stress and antioxidative defense mechanisms in \u003cem\u003eGossypium hirsutum\u003c/em\u003e L. in response to extreme abiotic conditions. J Cotton Res 4, 9.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eQuan, L.J., Zhang, B., Shi, W.W. and Li, H.Y., 2008. Hydrogen peroxide in plants: a versatile molecule of the reactive oxygen species network. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 50(1), 2-18.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eR Core Team 2013: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRohman MM, Islam MR, Habib SH, Choudhury DA, Mohi-Ud-Din M (2024). NADPH oxidase-mediated reactive oxygen species, antioxidant isozymes, and redox homeostasis regulate salt sensitivity in maize genotypes. \u003cem\u003eHeliyon 9\u003c/em\u003e, e26920 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26920\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSaxena I , Srikanth Sandhya , Chen Zhong. 2016. Cross Talk between H2O2 and Interacting Signal Molecules under Plant Stress Response. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSingh YJ, Satvir Kaur Grewal, Ranjit Kaur Gill. 2021. Proline metabolism and phenylpropanoid pathway act independently in conferring resistance against yellow mosaic virus infection in black gram. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology,Volume 116, 101713,\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpitz, D.R.; Oberley, L.W. 1989. An assay for superoxide dismutase activity in mammalian tissue homogenates. Anal. Biochem. 179, 8\u0026ndash;18.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSun H, Hongbo Zhang, Zisong Xu, Yue Wang, Xiaoqian Liu, Yuanyuan Li, Bei Tian, Guangyu Sun, Huihui Zhang. 2021. TMT-based quantitative proteomic analysis of the effects of \u003cem\u003ePseudomonas syringae\u003c/em\u003e pv. \u003cem\u003etabaci\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003ePst\u003c/em\u003e) infection on photosynthetic function and the response of the MAPK signaling pathway in tobacco leaves. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,Volume 166,Pages 657-667.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSunic K, Brkljacic L, Vukovic R, Katanic Z, Salopek-Sondi B, Spanic V. 2023. Fusarium Head Blight Infection Induced Responses of Six Winter Wheat Varieties in Ascorbate\u0026ndash;Glutathione Pathway, Photosynthetic Efficiency and Stress Hormones. Plants. 2023; 12(21):3720. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12213720\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTembo B., Mulenga R. M., Sichilima S., M\u0026rsquo;siska K. K., Mwale M., Chikoti P. C., et al. (2020). Detection and characterization of fungus (\u003cem\u003eMagnaporthe oryzae\u003c/em\u003e pathotype \u003cem\u003eTriticum\u003c/em\u003e) causing wheat blast disease on rain-fed grown wheat (\u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e L.) in Zambia. PLoS One 15:e0238724. 10.1371/journal.pone.0238724.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTorres MA, Jones JD, Dangl JL. 2006. Reactive oxygen species signaling in response to pathogens. Plant Physiol. 141(2), 373-378. doi:10.1104/pp.106.079467\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUSDA, 2022. Unites states Department of Agriculture. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/outlooks/104470/whs-22h.pdf?v=8189\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang H, Sun S, Ge W, Zhao L, Hou B, Wang K, Lyu Z, Chen L, Xu S, Guo J, Li M, Su P, Li X, Wang G, Bo C, Fang X, Zhuang W, Cheng X, Wu J, Dong L, Chen W, Li W, Xiao G, Zhao J, Hao Y, Xu Y, Gao Y, Liu W, Liu Y, Yin H, Li J, Li X, Zhao Y, Wang X, Ni F, Ma X, Li A, Xu SS, Bai G, Nevo E, Gao C, Ohm H, Kong L. 2020. Horizontal gene transfer of \u003cem\u003eFhb7\u003c/em\u003e from fungus underlies Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Science. 22;368(6493): eaba5435.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWei F, Shi J-C, Jin J-S, Duan Z-Y, Liang X, Luo J-N, Qiu L-j, Luo J, Xu X-n, Wen Y-Q, Feng J-Y. 2024. Comprehensive evaluation of resistance of different strawberry varieties to Xanthomonas fragariae, Scientia Horticulturae, Volume 325, 112647.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWickham H. 2016. \u003cem\u003eggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis.\u003c/em\u003e Springer. New York, USA.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWilliamson VM, Thomas V, Ferris H, Dubcovsky J (2013) An \u003cem\u003eAegilops ventricosa \u003c/em\u003etranslocation confers resistance against root-knot nematodesto common wheat. Crop Sci 53:1412\u0026ndash;1418.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYu, C. W., T. M. Murphy, Lin, C. H. 2003. Hydrogen peroxide-induced chilling tolerance in mung beans mediated through ABA-independent glutathione accumulation. Functional Plant Biology 30(9), 955-963. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZainy Z, Fayyaz M, Yasmin T, Hyder MZ, Haider W, Farrakh S, 2023. Antioxidant enzymes activity and gene expression in wheat-stripe rust interaction at seedling stage. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology,Volume 124,101960.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress, proline, pigment and blast disease","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8733903/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8733903/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eWheat blast, caused by the hemibiotrophic fungus \u003cem\u003eMagnaporthe oryzae Triticum\u003c/em\u003e (MoT), is a destructive disease that poses a severe threat to global wheat production. The 2NS chromosomal translocation, introgressed from \u003cem\u003eAegilops ventricosa\u003c/em\u003e into the Bangladeshi wheat variety BARI Gom 33 (BG33), confers moderate-to-high resistance to MoT under field conditions. Despite its widespread deployment, the molecular mechanisms underlying this 2NS-mediated resistance remain largely unknown. This study aimed to elucidate the physiological and biochemical bases of resistance in BG33, specifically regarding its capacity to counteract infection-induced oxidative stress. Comparative analysis between the resistant variety (BG33) and a susceptible variety (BARI Gom 26, BG26) revealed that BG33 maintained significantly lower accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), including hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), and exhibited reduced lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde, MDA) and lipoxygenase (LOX) activity post-inoculation. BG33 also retained higher photosynthetic pigment integrity (chlorophyll and carotenoids), indicating superior protection against oxidative cellular damage. Crucially, BG33 displayed enhanced constitutive and MoT-induced antioxidant activity; basal levels of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), and proline were 1.3\u0026ndash;2.5-fold higher in BG33 than in BG26. Upon MoT infection, BG33 further upregulated enzymatic antioxidants including superoxide dismutase (SOD), CAT, APX, GPX, glutathione reductase, dehydroascorbate reductase, and monodehydroascorbate reductase and proline by 1.2\u0026ndash;2.0-fold, establishing a robust state of redox homeostasis that was absent in BG26. These findings establish, for the first time, that the 2NS translocation bolsters MoT resistance by potentiating a multi-tiered antioxidant defense system to mitigate the oxidative burst and preserve cellular function. This study provides a novel mechanistic framework for leveraging antioxidant pathways in the development of more durable and resilient blast-resistant wheat varieties.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"The 2NS Chromosomal Translocation Enhances Redox Homeostasis and Mitigates Oxidative Stress during Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum Infection in Wheat","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-02-19 07:06:58","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8733903/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2026-04-01T16:28:39+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-03-26T16:46:29+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-03-25T08:59:37+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"94237688847529383690500597590047028790","date":"2026-03-19T18:24:42+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"199438649933523634088460867573918473931","date":"2026-03-17T18:39:01+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-03-09T11:37:08+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"122314902466481523823039360288505473230","date":"2026-02-13T14:59:32+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2026-02-13T14:44:28+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2026-02-03T16:01:26+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2026-02-02T01:24:43+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2026-02-02T01:24:29+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2026-01-29T16:41:27+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"16973672-061b-43c8-a5a7-94e6c6dd8ee3","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 19th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":62969885,"name":"Biological sciences/Biochemistry"},{"id":62969886,"name":"Biological sciences/Biotechnology"},{"id":62969887,"name":"Biological sciences/Microbiology"},{"id":62969888,"name":"Biological sciences/Plant sciences"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-05-11T16:10:20+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-02-19 07:06:58","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8733903","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8733903","identity":"rs-8733903","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.