Generalizable gesture recognition using magnetomyography

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15

Magnetomyography (MMG) sensors achieved high gesture classification accuracy across participants and sessions, outperforming electromyography (sEMG) by mitigating individual physiological differences.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The progression of human-computer interfaces into immersive and touchless realities requires new ways of interacting with machines that are correspondingly intuitive and seamless. Among these are gesture-based systems that use natural hand movements to interact with and control digital devices. Today, these systems are most commonly implemented through the use of cameras or inertial sensors, which have drawbacks in environments that are poorly lit, in conditions where the hands are obscured, or for applications that require fine motor control. More recent studies have advocated for the use of surface electromyography (sEMG) to capture gesture information by sensing electrical activity generated by muscle contraction. While promising demonstrations have been shown, studies have also outlined limitations in sEMG when it comes to generalization across a population, largely due to physiological differences between individuals. Magnetomyography (MMG) is an alternative modality for measuring the same motor signals at the muscle, but is impervious to distortions caused by tissue, hair, and moisture; this indicates potential for lower variability caused by physiological differences and changes in skin conductivity, making MMG a promising generalizable solution for gesture control. To test this theory, we developed wristbands with magnetic sensors and implemented a signal processing pipeline for gesture classification. Using this system, we measured MMG across 30 participants performing a gesture task consisting of nine discrete gestures. We demonstrate average single-participant classification accuracy of 95.4%, rivaling state-of-the-art accuracy with sEMG. In addition, we achieved higher cross-session and cross-participant accuracy compared to sEMG studies. Given that these results were obtained with a non-ideal recording system, we anticipate significantly better results with better sensors. Together, these findings suggest that MMG can provide higher performance for control systems based on gesture recognition by overcoming limitations of existing techniques.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-18T06:52:13.688204+00:00