Speaking in Feelings: Facilitating Human Emotion Communication through Analogy by Large Language Models | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Speaking in Feelings: Facilitating Human Emotion Communication through Analogy by Large Language Models Jaewon Kim, Yerim Kwak, Hoyeon Kim, Bumseok Jeong This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6892199/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Measuring emotion remains a persistent challenge due to poor alignment between theoretical constructs and available measurement tools, as well as issues of underspecificity and low reliability. Dimensional approaches—especially those incorporating social-affective dimensions—are being explored for their potential to enhance the quality of emotional data. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) offer a novel opportunity to improve both emotion measurement and communication, leveraging their exceptional pattern recognition capabilities and capacity for multi-modal generation. In this study, we investigate for the first time whether LLMs can successfully mediate human emotional communication through analogical representations—expressing feelings not by naming them, but by evoking them. We utilized multi-dimensional affective ratings from 547 participants across eighteen emotion labels obtained in a prior study. Based on this human emotion representation and custom-designed prompts, an LLM generated both textual and high-resolution (1024 × 1024) image outputs for each label. Two independent raters selected ten texts and one image per label, which were then presented to a new sample of 138 participants via an online psychology experiment platform. Participants rated these multi-modal stimuli using the same multi-dimensional affective scale. Angular and Euclidean distance metrics were used to evaluate the similarity between participants’ affective responses and the original ratings. Emotional experiences for fifteen out of eighteen emotion labels were successfully reconstructed through exposure to LLM-generated stimuli. However, three emotions—disgust, satisfaction, and gratitude—were not effectively conveyed through either modality. The results also highlighted contextual modulation of emotion expression, influenced by media format and individual mood pathology. Across all categories, image-based stimuli evoked stronger affective responses than text. Moreover, participants with elevated depressive symptoms exhibited heightened emotional reactivity to shared stimuli—a potential affective signature of depression, rather than a general emotional amplification. This study introduces a novel pipeline for eliciting and transmitting human emotional experiences through language models using analogy as a bridge—a method that is both replicable and empirically validated. Still, establishing true equivalence of emotional experiences requires further theoretical and mathematical development. Future directions include incorporating physiological markers, comparing across LLM architectures, and refining generalizability for broader human-centered applications in affective computing. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6892199","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":471176298,"identity":"a66e0125-ca3a-42ce-b293-1f19d7dc27f7","order_by":0,"name":"Jaewon Kim","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7596-5577","institution":"KAIST","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jaewon","middleName":"","lastName":"Kim","suffix":""},{"id":471176300,"identity":"8de95373-8181-4edd-a6c6-1bef830bb419","order_by":1,"name":"Yerim Kwak","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yerim","middleName":"","lastName":"Kwak","suffix":""},{"id":471176302,"identity":"d734efa4-481f-4713-9ca8-dc9d5b65f625","order_by":2,"name":"Hoyeon Kim","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hoyeon","middleName":"","lastName":"Kim","suffix":""},{"id":471176303,"identity":"e0e4c8d8-ddfc-4293-ade9-b78ddda9df34","order_by":3,"name":"Bumseok Jeong","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bumseok","middleName":"","lastName":"Jeong","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-06-14 06:30:14","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6892199/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6892199/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":84758968,"identity":"2b6d1066-600d-4f75-ab8c-676be7dadcd0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-06-17 05:30:52","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1098624,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"AnalogyLLMdraftv1bsjwkarxiv.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6892199/v1_covered_acfe2dc0-967f-4350-9eeb-b55bea1d4b07.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eSpeaking in Feelings: Facilitating Human Emotion Communication through Analogy by Large Language Models\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6892199/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6892199/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eMeasuring emotion remains a persistent challenge due to poor alignment between theoretical constructs and available measurement tools, as well as issues of underspecificity and low reliability. Dimensional approaches—especially those incorporating social-affective dimensions—are being explored for their potential to enhance the quality of emotional data. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) offer a novel opportunity to improve both emotion measurement and communication, leveraging their exceptional pattern recognition capabilities and capacity for multi-modal generation. In this study, we investigate for the first time whether LLMs can successfully mediate human emotional communication through analogical representations—expressing feelings not by naming them, but by evoking them.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe utilized multi-dimensional affective ratings from 547 participants across eighteen emotion labels obtained in a prior study. Based on this human emotion representation and custom-designed prompts, an LLM generated both textual and high-resolution (1024 × 1024) image outputs for each label. Two independent raters selected ten texts and one image per label, which were then presented to a new sample of 138 participants via an online psychology experiment platform. Participants rated these multi-modal stimuli using the same multi-dimensional affective scale. Angular and Euclidean distance metrics were used to evaluate the similarity between participants’ affective responses and the original ratings.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEmotional experiences for fifteen out of eighteen emotion labels were successfully reconstructed through exposure to LLM-generated stimuli. However, three emotions—disgust, satisfaction, and gratitude—were not effectively conveyed through either modality. The results also highlighted contextual modulation of emotion expression, influenced by media format and individual mood pathology. Across all categories, image-based stimuli evoked stronger affective responses than text. Moreover, participants with elevated depressive symptoms exhibited heightened emotional reactivity to shared stimuli—a potential affective signature of depression, rather than a general emotional amplification.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study introduces a novel pipeline for eliciting and transmitting human emotional experiences through language models using analogy as a bridge—a method that is both replicable and empirically validated. Still, establishing true equivalence of emotional experiences requires further theoretical and mathematical development. Future directions include incorporating physiological markers, comparing across LLM architectures, and refining generalizability for broader human-centered applications in affective computing.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Speaking in Feelings: Facilitating Human Emotion Communication through Analogy by Large Language Models","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-06-17 05:06:43","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6892199/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"016ef3aa-d346-42f4-aa3c-d12a7bc17252","owner":[],"postedDate":"June 17th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":50041168,"name":"Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-06-17T05:06:43+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-06-17 05:06:43","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6892199","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6892199","identity":"rs-6892199","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.