Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends, Thematic Evolution, and Future Directions

Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends, Thematic Evolution, and Future Directions | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Systematic Review Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends, Thematic Evolution, and Future Directions Joshep Marua This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6747329/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This study does a bibliometric analysis of research trends in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs, investigating the thematic evolution, intellectual framework, and prospective orientations of this interdisciplinary domain. Analysis of Scopus data (1994–2025) indicates a substantial rise in academic output, propelled by the increasing incorporation of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) frameworks in business decision-making. Prominent themes encompass SDGs reporting, stakeholder engagement, board diversity, and the use of digital technology in governance. The results underscore the congruence of Corporate Social Responsibility studies with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), namely SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and SDG 13 (Climate Action). The study highlights deficiencies in the literature, including the necessity for further investigation into digital governance, AI-driven SDGs analytics, and the circular economy. Theoretical implications encompass the progression of stakeholder theory and agency theory about SDGs, whilst practical consequences emphasize the formulation of governance frameworks that improve transparency, accountability, and resilience. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research, highlighting the significance of inclusive governance models, international collaborations, and the incorporation of emerging technology to tackle intricate SDGs issues. International Business Management Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs Bibliometric Analysis SDGs Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13 1.0 Introduction Modern business practice has brought SDGs and Corporate Social Responsibility together as interdependent practices. Corporate Social Responsibility functions through mechanisms along with processes and relationships which offer stakeholder oversight for responsible management of corporations [1]. The concept of SDGs brings together environmental considerations and social aspects with governance elements to develop enduring economy and society as well as environmental growth [2], [3]. The fusion between corporate SDGs and economic SDGs received rising interest during the recent years because companies face mounting pressure to prove social responsibility alongside financial success. Organizations use Corporate Social Responsibility systems for defining their sustainable policies through their impact on strategic choices and risk management and social conduct [4]. The systematic evaluation of research patterns and structural development in this field is possible through bibliometric analysis which presents itself as an established evaluation method. Quantitative methods allow this analysis to show how scholarly work relates to each other and what prominent authors are while revealing new topics [5], [6]. Corporations controlled by good governance standards improve SDGs reporting and performance which brings a positive impact on sustainable development [7], [8]. Through bibliometric analysis researchers now have the ability to study how board diversity along with stakeholder engagement along with corporate social responsibility (CSR) has transformed since the start of SDGs discussions [9], [10]. Research experts study citation networks as well as co-authoring relationships to recognize unexplored areas and present upcoming academic pathways that boost Corporate Social Responsibility SDGs performance [11]. Annually growing global corporate economy requires academics policymakers and practitioners to focus intensely on the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs. The traditional Corporate Social Responsibility structures have adapted to incorporate SDGs principles because businesses face rising responsibility to demonstrate social and environmental impact alongside ethical conduct [12], [13]. The fundamental change in the research field demands an extensive knowledge of thematic evolution patterns alongside research patterns and future directions in this cross-disciplinary field. The traditional focus of Corporate Social Responsibility towards enhancing shareholder value and agency problem mitigation extends to embrace environmental social governance (ESG) elements [14], [15]. Saints-based integration in Corporate Social Responsibility helps managers tackle stakeholder competition while sustaining business benefits over extended periods. The research and practical challenges regarding SDGs governance stem from a deficiency of universal governance model standards [16]. The mapping capability of bibliometric analysis helps researchers track scholarly development along with major research subjects in this academic field. The researchers use quantitative methods to analyze academic literature and networked co-citation and keyword co-occurrence to establish connections between governance systems and sustainable business approaches [17]. Along with identifying new research clusters this exploration intends to deliver valuable recommendations for business executives and public officials [18]. Research becomes essential because global SDGs problems such as climate change and social inequality and corporate ethics have become increasingly complex. Strong governance structures are required to handle these issues while simultaneously promoting innovation together with resilience [19], [20], [21]. Due to the fast-growing number of ESG reporting requirements and regulations companies need thorough understanding of how board members executive leaders and institutional investors can properly make SDGs decisions [22], [23]. SDGs research combines dynamic interdisciplinary work along with technological progress into one field which demands researchers to analyze existing literature holistically for detecting missing elements and prospective research pathways [24]. The study will advance sustainable Corporate Social Responsibility knowledge through bibliometric analysis to create a foundation for theory development and practice [25]. This research investigates the academic relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs by studying publication patterns along with thematic trends and projected scholarly development. The study examines field intellectual structure to identify authors and institutions together with journals while revealing new clusters so it can unify governance mechanisms with sustainable practices. This research investigates three important areas about SDGs framework development and regional market changes and their impact on corporate decision processes driven by ESG considerations. The study exists to respond to three key global developments which include SDGs requirements alongside efforts to prevent greenwashing while seeking evidence-based policy solutions. A systematic evaluation in this research contributes essential knowledge to academics and policymakers and business executives for designing governance frameworks which simultaneously boost environmental responsibility alongside social accountability and better corporate transparency [26], [27], [28], [29]. 2.0 Methodology Methods from bibliometric analysis have been used to study Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs research from 1994 to 2025. Bibliometric analysis serves as an established quantitative research method for scholarly literature tracking and measuring which [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [30] first invented and [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [31], [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [32] and [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [33] have extensively used to explore research field growth. The method helps researchers discover leading authors together with notable journals and research subject evolution which makes it vital for visualizing field direction and new trends [34], [35]. The decision to choose Scopus stems from its broad literature coverage in academic peer-reviewed research that extends to research papers and conference proceedings as well as books and reviews. Scopus provides reliable metadata about scholarly impact assessment and collaboration networks due to its comprehensive citation relationships and author affiliation information [36], [37]. The research used “Corporate Social Responsibility” and “SDGs” search terms which were refined by selecting Business, Management, Accounting, Economics and Finance documents while limiting results to English-language materials and resulting in 6,008 records from 1,307 sources. Changes in this scholarly field show a 20.5% yearly expansion which is supported by documents being relatively new at 4.53 years on average and receiving 23.21 references per document. The research includes 11,589 authors comprised of 934 single-authors while the references reach 328,197 which represents the high level of academic information exchange. Results of collaborative analysis show that international co-authorship occurs in 27.95% of documents which have an average 2.68 external contributors per document thus indicating strong global research collaboration. The research output demonstrates diversity because journal articles 4714 represent the largest category followed by book Chaps. 726 and then books 185, conference papers 146 and review papers 237. Research on customer-centric retailing applies both performance analysis and science mapping methodologies according to [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [36] and [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [38] and [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [39] and [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [40] to investigate core researchers and notable journals together with citation patterns and thematic evolutions. Research achievement analysis evaluates the publication frequency of institutions and countries as well as journals yet science mapping through networks of co-citations and keyword and bibliographic coupling displays conceptual shifts and thematic progression. The research utilizes Biblioshiny for thematic mapping and co-citation network visualization and VOSviewer for keyword overlay visualization and bibliometric coupling as part of its data visualization process through R. Table 1 Demographic Information Description Results Timespan 1994:2025 Sources (Journals, Books, etc) 1307 Documents 6008 Annual Growth Rate % 20.5 Document Average Age 4.53 Average citations per doc 23.21 References 328197 DOCUMENT CONTENTS Keywords Plus (ID) 2192 Author's Keywords (DE) 9809 AUTHORS Authors 11589 Authors of single-authored docs 934 AUTHORS COLLABORATION Single-authored docs 1164 Co-Authors per Doc 2.68 International co-authorships % 27.95 DOCUMENT TYPES article 4714 book 185 book chapter 726 conference paper 146 review 237 3.0 Results The bibliometric analysis contains five main sections about Total Production of Scientific Literature and Journal Level and Author Level and Document Level and Thematic Level. The scientific research output consists of all literature which gets produced according to country, affiliation and sponsoring agency. This research implements collaboration between numerous affiliations and countries across the globe. We evaluate the journals and the leader identification process depends on measuring scientific output quantity. Organize and apply data regarding fractionalized articles to determine main authorship. In this research component. The study piece occupies the highest position in green finance research because it receives the most local citations. Multiple bibliometric approaches comprising theme Map and Thematic Evolution Map and Co-word analysis and Co-citation analysis were applied for science mapping to develop theme clusters and future research directions on carbon finance. 3.1 Annual Scientific and Countries Production Over-Time In Fig. 1 , the research publication about Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs shows exponential growth in scholarly outputs from 2010 until a peak occurred in 2025 before a substantial decrease appears. The data shows that academic interest in governance mechanisms together with ESG frameworks and corporate SDGs disclosure practices is accelerating because of regulatory shifts and investor demands and the SDG framework. Research in sustainable corporate practices requires study to determine if the 2025 peak signifies terminations in policy changes or corporate alignment with new priorities. The study introduces new insights to identify quick changes in research trends that influence sustainable corporate management. Future research must evaluate citation relationships between papers and institutional partnership patterns while investigating new ESG reporting methods and stakeholder capitalism models along with green financial systems. The analysis would benefit from references including [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [41] on corporate SDGs reporting as well as [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [7] on integrated reporting to understand this bibliometric assessment. In the Fig. 2 the visual depiction of scientific productivity displays China extending its lead while the UK and Indonesia maintain positions behind it and the USA takes the third spot. An overlay Pareto line demonstrates the total amount of scientific output each country produces. The distribution reveals substantial differences in research production because several nations maintain major control over worldwide scientific literature while Lotka’s Law of scientific productivity applies here. This analysis presents original findings by demonstrating the higher research output performances of Indonesia and Malaysia while surpassing traditional scientific powers of Germany and France. The new global research structure shows signs of evolving due to rising investment and improved institutional backing together with better digital platforms for research. Academic citations originating from regions producing many research publications can affect worldwide citation networks by making the Matthew Effect stronger in academic impact. Future studies should examine relationships between funding allocations and research organization strength as well as their combined role in promoting citational effects for a complete understanding of the findings. 3.2 Average Citations and Most Citated Countries The research on Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs has progressed markedly, characterized by various phases of development and theme transitions. In Fig. 3 The initial period (1994–2005) experienced intermittent contributions, culminating in a pivotal study in 2000 that attained a Mean Total Citation per Article (MeanTCperArt) of 1,477, signifying its foundational influence. From 2006 to 2016, research activity surged, escalating from 18 articles in 2006 to 203 in 2016, while citation impact remained substantial, reaching a zenith of 136.72 in 2006. This era signified the integration of SDGs into governance frameworks, consistent with earlier systematic assessments [42], [43]. Beginning in 2017, publication volume escalated, peaking at 1,371 in 2024, while citation impact diminished MeanTCperArt decreased to 2.93, signifying scientific fragmentation. This pattern reflects other bibliometric assessments, indicating a transition from basic research to specialized investigations. Thematic progression underscores a shift from conventional governance structures to cohesive ESG frameworks, stakeholder theory, and adherence to regulatory standards. In Fig. 4 Total citations (TC) and average article citations indicate the quantity and significance of research output among countries, providing insights into academic influence and knowledge distribution in this domain. The United Kingdom (UK), United States (USA), and Australia are the biggest contributors, with citation totals of 15,529, 14,483, and 10,013, respectively. Canada 54.90, Germany 52.80, and France 50.20 demonstrate elevated average citations per publication, reflecting substantial scholarly influence and notable research quality. This pattern corresponds with other research [44], [45], which underscores the critical influence of institutions in these nations on Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs frameworks. China 7,561 and Malaysia 3,219 have an increasing research presence; nonetheless, their lower average article citations 14.40 and 13.50, respectively indicate a developing academic impact. In contrast, Belgium 71.20 excels in average citations, perhaps attributable to significant cooperation and the incorporation of Corporate Social Responsibility within European SDGs frameworks [46]. Emerging economies like India 11.00, Indonesia 7.60, and Saudi Arabia 9.30 demonstrate diminished citation effect despite increasing research involvement. This indicates possible deficiencies in international academic cooperation, research output quality, and policy execution. The comparatively low citation counts of Pakistan 23.10 and Iran 26.30 correspond with prior findings by [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [47], underscoring difficulties in research funding and global visibility. The variation in research effect throughout areas signifies a necessity for improved collaboration between prominent research centers and developing contributions. Enhancing multidisciplinary methodologies, advocating for open-access distribution, and cultivating collaborations between industry and academia could address these disparities. This bibliometric assessment underscores the preeminence of Western economies in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs studies, alongside significant contributions from Asia-Pacific countries. Despite citation differences, enhanced worldwide cooperation and institutional backing may foster a more inclusive and influential research environment. Conforming to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and governance frameworks would be crucial for directing the forthcoming phase of research advancement in this field. 3.3 Most Relevant Sources and Impact Figure 5 highlights the preeminence of renowned academic publications that significantly contribute to the discourse on Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs. Corporate Social Responsibility (Bingley) is the most prolific source, with 193 publications, underscoring its pivotal role in establishing governance paradigms and regulatory frameworks. Likewise, CSR, SDGs, Ethics, and Governance 182 articles underscores the importance of ethical corporate conduct and sustainable business practices, highlighting the nexus between governance frameworks and corporate social responsibility (CSR). The prevalence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (158 articles) and Business Strategy and the Environment 106 articles indicates a growing academic emphasis on the integration of governance systems with environmental SDGs. Prestigious journals like the Journal of Business Ethics 97 articles and Corporate Social Responsibility: An International Review 91 articles substantiate the ethical aspects of governance research, reflecting a persistent focus on ethical leadership, stakeholder involvement, and sustainable decision-making. The Journal of Cleaner Production 65 articles emphasize the significance of governance in promoting cleaner production and SDGs-oriented corporate practices. Thematic progression in this field illustrates the increasing connections among governance, SDGs, finance, and risk management. Publications like the Journal of Risk and Financial Management 91 articles and Finance Research Letters 61 articles underscore the financial ramifications of governance practices, demonstrating the impact of SDGs imperatives on corporate financial performance, risk evaluation, and investment strategies. The contributions from the International Review of Financial Analysis 46 articles, Research in International Business and Finance 38 articles, and Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment 33 articles indicate a thematic transition towards sustainable financial practices, ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investments, and impact-oriented financial decision-making. These findings correspond with existing literature that supports the incorporation of SDGs factors into corporate financial governance frameworks [48], [49]. The bibliometric analysis reveals a growing academic interest in governance systems across various SDGs contexts, but many gaps persist. Although many studies emphasize financial governance and ESG integration, scant attention has been directed on the impact of digital transformation and artificial intelligence on the SDGs of Corporate Social Responsibility. Emerging technologies, including blockchain for transparency and AI-driven risk assessment, require additional investigation. Secondly, although journals such as the Journal of Governance and Regulation 44 articles and the SDGs Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 40 articles have made substantial contributions, regulatory perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility within SDGs transitions remain inadequately examined. Comparative governance frameworks across various regulatory systems may yield enhanced understanding of policy efficacy. Finally, the amalgamation of governance and circular economy techniques constitutes an emerging study domain. Publications like the Journal of Cleaner Production and Corporate Ownership and Control 47 articles suggest the importance of sustainable production and ownership frameworks; however, further empirical research is required to investigate the influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on the promotion of circular economy implementation and SDGs-focused business models. This bibliometric analysis provides a thorough assessment of Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs research, highlighting principal publishing sources, theme developments, and prospective research directions. Table 2 delineates the principal findings of prominent journals that contribute to research on Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs. The Journal of Business Ethics (h-index = 51, TC = 11,863) is the preeminent publication, prioritizing ethical decision-making in Corporate Social Responsibility, succeeded by Business Strategy and the Environment (h-index = 44, TC = 7,192), which concentrates on business strategy and environmental SDGs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (h-index = 42, TC = 7,284) and Corporate Social Responsibility: An International Review (h-index = 36, TC = 5,370) offer insights into SDGs reporting and stakeholder engagement, corroborating prior bibliometric analyses [50]. The thematic evolution indicates a transition towards integrated reporting, corporate social responsibility (CSR), and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics, as evidenced by Corporate Social Responsibility (Bingley) (h-index = 37, NP = 193) and Journal of Cleaner Production (h-index = 37, TC = 4,952). This corresponds with meta-analytical assessments (Friede, Busch, & Bassen, 2015) that associate company governance with ESG performance. New study areas encompass digital governance, AI-enhanced corporate decision-making, and the influence of financial technology on sustainable governance, as evidenced by Finance study Letters (h-index = 15, TC = 686) and Journal of Risk and Financial Management (h-index = 16, TC = 908). Furthermore, contributions from Cogent Business and Management (h-index = 18, NP = 155) underscore the increasing multidisciplinary character of Corporate Social Responsibility research. The concordance of findings with prior bibliometric studies confirms the strength of the research landscape, indicating sustained scholarly focus on the integration of governance processes with SDGs goals, hence enhancing academic and policy-making discussions. Table 2 Sources Impact Overtime Sources h_index g_index m_index TC NP PY_start Journal of Business Ethics 51 97 2.217 11863 97 2003 Business Strategy and the Environment 44 84 1.375 7192 106 1994 Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 42 84 2.471 7284 158 2009 Corporate Social Responsibility (Bingley) 37 56 2.643 4180 193 2012 Journal of Cleaner Production 37 65 1.542 4952 65 2002 Corporate Social Responsibility: An International Review 36 73 1.286 5370 91 1998 Social Responsibility Journal 22 36 1.048 1368 55 2005 Journal of Management and Governance 21 45 0.84 2107 55 2001 Meditari Accountancy Research 21 40 1.75 1677 55 2014 International Journal of Accounting & Information Management 20 37 2.222 1384 39 2017 Management decision 20 42 1 1786 46 2006 SDGs Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 19 40 1.188 1785 40 2010 Cogent Business & Management 18 29 2 1297 155 2017 Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting 18 28 2.25 914 61 2018 International Review of Financial Analysis 16 40 1.231 1612 46 2013 Journal of Risk and Financial Management 16 27 2.286 908 91 2019 Finance Research Letters 15 25 1.875 686 61 2018 Journal of Business Research 15 28 1.154 1012 28 2013 Research in International Business and Finance 15 35 1 1255 38 2011 International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 14 28 0.824 853 59 2009 Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 14 26 1.556 693 32 2017 Journal of Corporate Finance 14 17 1.273 2009 17 2015 Business & Society 13 18 0.619 1246 18 2005 Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 13 19 1.444 409 24 2017 International Journal of Emerging Markets 13 19 1.625 374 25 2018 (TC = Total Citation, PY = Publication Year, NP = Number of Publication). 3.4 Most Contributing Authors Analysis of Fig. 6 reveals Velte P as the preeminent author in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs research, boasting 31.5 fractionalized publications, markedly exceeding Clarke T 15.2, Idowu SO 12.2, Hussainey K 11.7, and Ingley C 11.2. Velte's significant contributions to ESG performance and governance frameworks correspond with previous research highlighting the influence of governance structures on business SDGs. Clarke and Idowu's emphasis on regulatory frameworks and SDGs reporting underscores the multidisciplinary aspect of this research, as noted in [51]. The involvement of Hussainey K and Ingley C, recognized for their contributions to governance transparency and board efficacy, signifies a global research impact, especially in emerging economies where governance disclosure affects corporate SDGs [52]. Authors such as Treepongkaruna S 8.3, García-Sánchez IM 7.8, and Jarboui A 7.2 demonstrate an increasing focus on financial stability, organizational risk, and ethical decision-making in SDGs frameworks. The bibliometric trends indicate a concentration of study within a few numbers of prolific experts, underscoring the necessity for expanded interdisciplinary collaboration. Table 3 : Authors’ Impact Analysis evaluates prominent researchers in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs using essential bibliometric metrics, including the h-index, g-index, m-index, total citations (TC), number of publications (NP), and publication year (PY_start). The results offer significant insights on research productivity, impact, and the development of academic contributions in this field. The analysis indicates that Velte P possesses an h-index of 19, a g-index of 38, and total citations (TC) of 2183, demonstrating a significant scholarly impact since 2014. His substantial publication record (NP = 38) indicates a consistent research contribution to Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs. Hussainey K and García-Sánchez I-M demonstrate considerable research influence, possessing h-indices of 17 and 16, respectively, along with notable total citations of 1438 and 1361. Their contributions, commencing in 2015 and 2013, respectively, signify a sustained commitment to the advancement of SDGs-related governance research. Elamer AA and Khatib SFA are distinguished among rising researchers due to their elevated m-indices of 1.714 and 2.0, respectively, indicating significant academic impact in relation to their career duration. The involvement of writers like Albitar K and Treepongkaruna S, who possess significant h-indices and g-indices, underscores an increasing emphasis on Corporate Social Responsibility research from a SDGs viewpoint in recent years. Thematic analysis reveals that governance mechanisms, disclosure methods, and the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors have emerged as the predominant study issues. Researchers such Maroun W, Ntim CG, and Zaman R have made substantial contributions in various fields, as demonstrated by their notable citation impact and consistent publication record. The variation in PY among authors highlights the interdisciplinary character of Corporate Social Responsibility research, with both early contributors (Rezaee Z, Mersland R) and newer newcomers (Hussain N, Salehi M) influencing the field's development. These findings correspond with earlier bibliometric studies on Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs, highlighting the influence of prolific scholars in molding academic discourse. The preeminence of high-impact scholars corresponds with other bibliometric studies [53], [54] that highlight the growing incorporation of governance and SDGs indicators in corporate strategy research. Furthermore, the citation trends and research productivity indicate that the subject has experienced significant expansion, propelled by new SDGs issues and global regulatory advancements. Table 3 Authors’ Impact Author h_index g_index m_index TC NP PY_start Velte P 19 38 1.583 2183 38 2014 Hussainey K 17 36 1.545 1438 36 2015 García-Sánchez I-M 16 21 1.231 1361 21 2013 Ntim CG 13 14 1 2012 14 2013 Elamer AA 12 16 1.714 825 16 2019 Jiraporn P 12 18 1.5 371 24 2018 Jarboui A 11 19 1.571 381 20 2019 Maroun W 11 17 0.846 598 17 2013 Albitar K 10 17 1.667 704 17 2020 Khatib SFA 10 17 2 753 17 2021 Martinez-Ferrero J 10 13 0.909 932 13 2015 Rezaee Z 10 14 0.714 874 14 2012 Treepongkaruna S 10 17 2 319 25 2021 Wang Y 10 20 1.111 418 24 2017 Zaman R 10 12 1.111 935 12 2017 Gallego-Álvarez I 9 9 0.692 272 9 2013 Li Y 9 20 1.125 900 20 2018 Nadeem M 9 9 1 601 9 2017 Salehi M 9 11 1.125 250 11 2018 Aguilera RV 8 10 0.615 716 10 2013 Almaqtari FA 8 14 1.143 205 17 2019 De Villiers C 8 8 0.727 541 8 2015 Hussain N 8 9 1 1125 9 2018 Li Z 8 11 0.8 530 11 2016 Mersland R 8 11 0.471 845 11 2009 (TC = Total Citation, PY = Publication Year, NP = Number of Publication) The bibliometric examination of Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs underscores substantial contributions from institutions in Asia and Europe. Table 4 : Most Significant Affiliations, with the University of Sfax (Tunisia) at the forefront, succeeded by Malaysian institutions including Universiti Teknologi MARA, Universiti Utara Malaysia, and Universiti Sains Malaysia. These universities have an increasing focus on sustainable governance in the realm of emerging markets. The University of Portsmouth and the University of Southampton significantly contribute, reflecting the United Kingdom's leadership in incorporating SDGs into governance frameworks. Chinese and Indonesian institutions, such as the University of International Business and Economics and Airlangga University, demonstrate an increasing focus on sustainable governance in swiftly advancing economies. The topic progression indicates a transition from initial studies centered on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) to more extensive analyses of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards, SDGs reporting, and governance frameworks that influence sustainable development. The prevalence of Asian institutions indicates the increasing impact of developing economies in establishing global governance standards, consistent with previous research highlighting SDGs disclosures and governance practices in these areas. Table 4 Most Relevant Affiliation Affiliation Country Articles University of Sfax Tunisia 94 Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia 92 Universiti Utara Malaysia Malaysia 76 University of Portsmouth United Kingdom 74 Universiti Sains Malaysia Malaysia 70 Universiti Malaysia Terengganu Malaysia 55 Universiti Putra Malaysia Malaysia 51 Chulalongkorn University Thailand 49 University of Southampton United Kingdom 45 RMIT University Australia 42 University of Groningen Netherlands 41 University of International Business and Economics China 40 Airlangga University Indonesia 37 Sebelas Maret University Indonesia 37 University of Economics and Law Vietnam 36 Massey University New Zealand 35 Curtin University Australia 34 University of Salamanca Spain 34 Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Malaysia 33 Renmin University of China China 32 Zhongnan University of Economics and Law China 32 Dongbei University of Finance and Economics China 30 Jiangsu University China 29 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Iran 28 3.5 Thematical Analysis Figure 7 's frequent word analysis indicates a significant study emphasis on the convergence of Corporate Social Responsibility, sustainable development, and corporate strategy, underscoring governance's pivotal role in influencing SDGs practices [55], [56]. Research highlights governance strategies and corporate social responsibility (CSR) as essential tools for improving stakeholder confidence and ensuring regulatory compliance [57]. The regional focus on China indicates an increasing scrutiny of governance improvements in emerging economies [58]. The amalgamation of industrial management, economic and social ramifications, and finance indicates a transition towards evaluating the economic implications of SDGs, hence strengthening institutional viewpoints [59]. Regression analysis demonstrates a significant dependence on empirical techniques to assess the connections between governance and SDGs, consistent with econometric research on business performance [60]. Moreover, stakeholder participation, investment strategies, and corporate decision-making are key elements in comprehending financial and strategic answers to SDGs concerns [61]. Increasing focus on climate change and environmental governance underscores business alignment with global SDGs frameworks like TCFD and the EU Taxonomy [62]. The findings indicate that although governance and SDGs research has advanced, forthcoming studies ought to investigate AI-driven ESG analytics, digital governance, and sustainable investment strategies as new frontiers in the discipline [63]. Figure 8 's Word Tree Map analysis identifies Corporate Social Responsibility as the predominant theme 192, 10%, underscoring its essential function in organizational accountability and ethical conduct, consistent with previous studies on risk mitigation and stakeholder trust. Corporate strategy 133, 7% and sustainable development 149, 8% underscore the amalgamation of strategic planning with SDGs objectives, indicating the wider implementation of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The governance approach 114, 6% and corporate social responsibility 98, 5% highlight the variety in governance frameworks and the increasing demand for firms to consider social and environmental consequences. Emerging topics such as China 64, 3% and finance 44, 2% signify regional and sectoral effects, whereas stakeholder focus 40, 2% denotes a transition towards inclusive governance frameworks. Figure 9 of the thematic mapping illustrates that specialist themes such as Corporate Social Responsibility, sustainable development, and industrial management are well-developed yet isolated, indicating their high density but limited centrality, in accordance with previous findings about the siloed character of these subjects. The lack of driving themes emphasizes the fragmented condition of the area, indicating a necessity for integrative research that connects governance and SDGs. Emerging or declining themes, such as corporate strategy and CSR, signify changing objectives, consistent with trends towards ESG frameworks and more sophisticated governance methodologies. Implicit themes presumably encompass fundamental notions such as stakeholder theory, which are essential for comprehending the evolution of the discipline. The analysis delineates significant trends in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs as illustrated in Fig. 10 , emphasizing ESG performance, CSR, and SDGs, which mirror the global transition towards ethical and sustainable business practices. Sub-themes including accounting, firm performance, gender diversity, earnings management, and board governance illustrate the intricacies of incorporating SDGs into corporate strategies, while the focus on disclosure and stakeholders emphasizes the significance of transparency in CSR initiatives. The term frequency data reveals a substantial rise in research production from 2018 to 2022, with forecasts extending to 2024, consistent with previous studies highlighting the increasing importance of these subjects in tackling global issues such as climate change and social injustice. This analysis underscores the necessity for additional investigation into ESG integration, the effects of technology on governance, and regulatory repercussions, establishing a solid basis for continued research in this dynamic domain. 3.6 Co-occurrence and Bibliometric Coupling In Fig. 11 the Co-occurrence of Keywords Network analysis through VOSviewer in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs research uncovers a dynamic intellectual landscape characterized by significant topic clusters, such as sustainable development, gender diversity, ownership structure, and corporate social responsibility. The centrality of Corporate Social Responsibility within the network underscores its significance, while the growing importance of SDGs assurance, carbon emissions, and ESG reporting signifies a transition towards stakeholder-oriented governance frameworks. The rise of gender diversity and board efficacy corresponds with previous research highlighting inclusive decision-making, however tax evasion and financialization illustrate ongoing discussions regarding governance transparency. Thematic trend indicates a shift from conventional governance frameworks to digital and SDGs-oriented models, corroborating the conclusions of [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [64] regarding stakeholder capitalism and [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [65] concerning ESG effect. The analysis through VOSviewer of the Bibliometric Coupling Author Network in Fig. 12 concerning Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs research identifies four principal thematic clusters: strategic governance and performance, regulatory compliance and ethical governance, SDGs reporting and CSR disclosure, and financial implications of stakeholder capitalism. The network visualization underscores prominent scholars, like [66], [67], [68], whose contributions have significantly influenced discourse on ESG integration, transparency, and corporate performance. The co-citation framework corresponds with agency theory, stakeholder theory, and legitimacy theory, substantiating prior research on the financial significance of SDGs governance (Eccles et al., 2014). The clustering further validates the bibliometric trends identified by de Villiers et al. (2014), highlighting the relationship between legislative frameworks and SDGs disclosures. Through VOSViewer Fig. 13 : Bibliometric Coupling Country Network examination of international collaborations in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs research underscores principal global research centers, nascent partnerships, and regional dynamics. The United States, China, and the United Kingdom are the foremost contributors to research, establishing robust co-authorship networks, consistent with prior studies [69], [70] that highlight their institutional and academic preeminence in SDGs governance. The red cluster (Western economies), green cluster (developing markets and Islamic economies), and blue cluster (Oceania and European outreach) represent separate regional research ecosystems, with the United Kingdom and Italy acting as vital knowledge conduits. Countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia, and South Africa exhibit heightened research involvement, indicating the globalization of SDGs governance dialogue. The network demonstrates a disproportionate presence of Western economies, highlighting the necessity for more South-South engagement to incorporate varied perspectives. Subsequent study ought to investigate developing themes such as ESG reporting, sustainable corporate policy, and digital governance [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [65] to facilitate a more inclusive and thorough comprehension of global corporate SDGs practices. 4.0 Discussions A bibliometric examination of Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs research offers an in-depth comprehension of the field's development and its correspondence with global SDGs objectives. The findings underscore a significant focus on ESG integration, stakeholder involvement, and governance's role in tackling environmental and social issues. This discourse correlates the research outcomes with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the study. The incorporation of ESG principles into Corporate Social Responsibility corresponds with SDG 8, which highlights sustainable economic growth, full employment, and dignified work. The study emphasis’s the significance of governance in fostering ethical corporate practices, transparency, and accountability, which are crucial for developing inclusive and resilient economies [71]. The emphasis on board diversity and gender equality in governance frameworks advances the SDG 8 objective of fostering equitable opportunities in the workplace [72]. Future study should investigate the adaptation of governance structures to address labor rights and equitable salaries, especially in emerging economies. The thematic progression of Corporate Social Responsibility research indicates an increasing focus on innovation and digital technology, in accordance with SDG 9. The incorporation of AI, blockchain, and more digital instruments into governance structures can improve transparency, risk management, and SDGs reporting [73]. These inventions can facilitate the advancement of sustainable infrastructure and industrial processes, especially in areas with constrained technological capacities. Future research should explore how digital governance might be utilized to tackle governance difficulties in developing economies. The bibliometric research highlights the significance of Corporate Social Responsibility in fostering sustainable production and consumption patterns, which are pivotal to SDG 12. The emphasis on SDGs reporting, circular economy initiatives, and environmental governance signifies a transition towards more accountable business models [74]. The increasing focus on cleaner production and sustainable supply chain management corresponds with the aims of SDG 12 concerning sustainable resource utilization and waste minimization. Future study should investigate methods to enhance governance systems that facilitate the implementation of circular economy ideas across various businesses. The topic analysis indicates a pronounced emphasis on climate change and environmental governance, directly corresponding with SDG 13. The incorporation of climate-related risks into Corporate Social Responsibility structures, alongside the focus on carbon emissions and SDGs assurance, signifies the increasing acknowledgement of corporations' involvement in combating climate change [75]. Future study should investigate the adaptation of governance structures to bolster company resilience against climate-related hazards and facilitate the transition to low-carbon economies. The research findings underscore the essential function of Corporate Social Responsibility in fostering transparency, accountability, and ethical behavior, which are pivotal to SDG 16. The emphasis on regulatory compliance, anti-corruption initiatives, and stakeholder engagement corresponds with the objective of establishing robust, inclusive, and responsible institutions [76]. Future study should examine the adaptation of governance frameworks to combat corruption and enhance the rule of law, especially in emerging markets. The bibliometric study indicates a significant focus on international collaboration and information dissemination in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs studies. The co-authorship networks and international research collaborations identified in the study correspond with SDG 17, which underscores the significance of global partnerships for attaining sustainable development [77]. Future study should investigate methods to enhance international relationships that facilitate the execution of ESG frameworks and SDGs programs, especially in areas with constrained resources and institutional capabilities. 5.0 Limitations and Future Directions Future research in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs should concentrate on emerging domains, including the incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) and digital technologies in ESG analytics, the function of blockchain in improving transparency, and the influence of digital transformation on sustainable governance frameworks. Moreover, there is a necessity for additional empirical research on the convergence of Corporate Social Responsibility and circular economy practices, with the establishment of universal governance norms applicable across various regulatory frameworks. Research should investigate the financial ramifications of sustainable investment methods and the influence of stakeholder capitalism in promoting long-term SDGs. This study has significant drawbacks, notably its dependence on bibliometric data from Scopus, potentially excluding pertinent studies from alternative databases. The analysis is limited by its temporal scope, encompassing only publications up to 2025, which may overlook new trends. Moreover, the emphasis on English-language publications may neglect important contributions from non-English-speaking areas, so constraining the worldwide relevance of the findings. Rectifying these shortcomings in forthcoming research will yield a more thorough comprehension of the dynamic interplay between Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs. 6.0 Conclusion This bibliometric analysis offers an extensive overview of the developing relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs, emphasizing notable research trends, topic advancements, and prospective directions. The research indicates an increasing focus on ESG integration, stakeholder engagement, and SDGs reporting, propelled by legislative changes and global SDGs issues. Although Western economies, notably the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, prevail in the research domain, rising economies such as China, Malaysia, and Indonesia are progressively enhancing the dialogue. The analysis highlights the significance of interdisciplinary collaboration, digital transformation, and inclusive governance frameworks in tackling complex SDGs challenges. Nonetheless, deficiencies persist in domains such as AI-driven governance, circular economy methodologies, and regional policy analyses. This research identifies pivotal authors, institutions, and topic clusters, providing essential insights for academics, policymakers, and practitioners, hence facilitating the development of more robust and inclusive Corporate Social Responsibility models that correspond with global SDGs objectives. Future study ought to concentrate on the integration of emerging technologies, the enhancement of global cooperation, and the exploration of the socio-economic effects of governance practices to promote sustainable development. References A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny, “A Survey of Corporate Governance,” J Finance , vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 737–783, Jun. 1997, doi: 10.1111/J.1540-6261.1997.TB04820.X. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x. [Accessed: Feb. 15, 2025] John. Elkington, “Cannibals with forks : the triple bottom line of 21st century business,” p. 410, 2002, Available: https://www.wiley.com/en-in/Cannibals+with+Forks%3A+The+Triple+Bottom+Line+of+21st+Century+Business-p-9781841120843. [Accessed: Mar. 16, 2025] R. Karim, A. Waaje, Md. M. Roshid, and Md. B. Yeamin, “Turning the Waste Into Wealth: Progressing Toward Global Sustainability Through the Circular Economy in Waste Management,” in Sustainable Waste Management in the Tourism and Hospitality Sectors , R. Sucheran, Ed., IGI Global, 2025, pp. 507–552. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-6110-8.ch019. Available: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/979-8-3693-6110-8.ch019 R. G. Eccles, I. Ioannou, and G. Serafeim, “The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance,” Manage Sci , vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2835–2857, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984 C. Zheng and R. Kouwenberg, “A Bibliometric Review of Global Research on Corporate Governance and Board Attributes,” Sustainability 2019, Vol. 11, Page 3428 , vol. 11, no. 12, p. 3428, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.3390/SU11123428. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3428/htm. [Accessed: Mar. 16, 2025] A. Waaje, R. Karim, Md. M. Roshid, and T. N. Meem, “Minimizing Waste in the Hospitality Industry: The Opportunities and Challenges of Lean Tourism,” in Sustainable Waste Management in the Tourism and Hospitality Sectors , R. Sucheran, Ed., IGI Global, 2025, pp. 125–166. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-6110-8.ch006. Available: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/979-8-3693-6110-8.ch006 M. K. Bosi, N. Lajuni, A. C. Wellfren, and T. S. Lim, “Sustainability Reporting through Environmental, Social, and Governance: A Bibliometric Review,” Sustainability 2022, Vol. 14, Page 12071 , vol. 14, no. 19, p. 12071, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3390/SU141912071. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12071/htm. [Accessed: Mar. 16, 2025] M. M. Roshid, A. Waaje, T. N. Meem, and A. Sarkar, “Logistics 4.0: A Comprehensive Literature Review of Technological Integration, Challenges, and Future Prospects of Implementation of Industry 4.0 Technologies,” International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society , vol. 20, no. 1. Common Ground Research Networks, pp. 65–85, 2024. doi: 10.18848/1832-3669/CGP/v20i01/65-85 V. Naciti, F. Cesaroni, and L. Pulejo, “Corporate governance and sustainability: a review of the existing literature,” Journal of Management and Governance , vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 55–74, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1007/S10997-020-09554-6/METRICS. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10997-020-09554-6. [Accessed: Mar. 16, 2025] R. Karim, Md. M. Roshid, F. B. Shamme, and Md. M. Hasan, “Non-performing Loans and Bank Profitability: Evidence from Bangladesh,” International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147–4486) , vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 95–102, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2314. Available: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/view/2314 N. O. D. Ellili, “A bibliometric review of bibliometric reviews of corporate governance: current topics and recommendations for future research,” International Journal of Disclosure and Governance , vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 244–262, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1057/S41310-024-00256-1/METRICS. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41310-024-00256-1. [Accessed: Mar. 16, 2025] E. Chytis, N. Eriotis, and M. Mitroulia, “ESG in Business Research: A Bibliometric Analysis,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management 2024, Vol. 17, Page 460 , vol. 17, no. 10, p. 460, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/JRFM17100460. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/10/460/htm. [Accessed: Mar. 17, 2025] A. Waaje, R. Karim, Md. M. Roshid, B. Yeamin, and T. N. Meem, “Integration of Industry 4.0 With Personalized Medicine,” in AI-Driven Personalized Healthcare Solutions , 2025, pp. 27–70. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-7858-8.ch002. Available: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/979-8-3693-7858-8.ch002 C. Estévez-Mendoza and Á. Montoro-Sánchez, “Exploring the relationship between innovation and corporate governance,” Technol Forecast Soc Change , vol. 209, p. 123784, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2024.123784 Md. M. Roshid, A. Waaje, R. Karim, M. R. Irtisham, and M. S. Kaswan, “Industry 5.0 and Organizational Sustainability : Integrating Cutting-Edge Technologies and Human Ingenuity,” in Industry 5.0 , Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2025, pp. 50–61. doi: 10.1201/9781003535188-7. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003535188-7/industry-5-0-organizational-sustainability-md-mustaqim-roshid-abdul-waaje-rejaul-karim-mohammad-rafid-irtisham-mahender-singh-kaswan. [Accessed: May 11, 2025] P. Ludwig and R. Sassen, “Which internal corporate governance mechanisms drive corporate sustainability?,” J Environ Manage , vol. 301, p. 113780, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2021.113780 K. Jain and P. S. Tripathi, “Mapping the environmental, social and governance literature: a bibliometric and content analysis,” Journal of Strategy and Management , vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 397–428, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1108/JSMA-05-2022-0092/FULL/XML C. Gherțescu, A. G. Manta, R. M. Bădîrcea, and L. F. Manta, “How Does the Digitalization Strategy Affect Bank Efficiency in Industry 4.0? A Bibliometric Analysis,” Systems 2024, Vol. 12, Page 492 , vol. 12, no. 11, p. 492, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.3390/SYSTEMS12110492. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/12/11/492/htm. [Accessed: Mar. 17, 2025] F. Ekardt, “Sustainability,” 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-19277-8. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-19277-8. [Accessed: Mar. 17, 2025] U. B. Antu et al. , “Perspective of nanocellulose production, processing, and application in sustainable agriculture and soil fertility enhancement: A potential review,” Int J Biol Macromol , p. 140570, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.140570 G. Song et al. , “The Neuromarketing: Bridging Neuroscience and Marketing for Enhanced Consumer Engagement,” IEEE Access , vol. 13, pp. 40331–40353, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3545742 A. Saban, N. Nazlia Jamil, and A. Roziana Mohd Ariffin, “Bibliometric Analysis of the Quality of Management Control System Using Delone and McLean Model,” 2024. Available: www.vosviewer.com A. Waaje, M. M. Roshid, S. Islam, R. Chandra Bhowmik, M. A. Rahaman, and M. M. Hassan, “Tourism, trade, energy, and economic development: Drivers of ecological footprint in the World’s top tourist destinations,” Innovation and Green Development , vol. 4, no. 3, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.igd.2025.100249 L. Scordato and M. Gulbrandsen, “Resilience perspectives in sustainability transitions research: A systematic literature review,” Environ Innov Soc Transit , vol. 52, p. 100887, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.EIST.2024.100887 R. Albahsh and M. F. Al-Anaswah, “Bibliometric analysis of corporate governance: Past, present, and future research agenda,” Corporate Ownership and Control , vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 146–168, May 2023, doi: 10.22495/cocv20i3art10 A. S. Dhaigude, A. Verma, and G. Nayak, “Sustainable production and consumption: a bibliometric analysis of SDG-12 literature through a financial management lens,” Cogent Economics & Finance , vol. 13, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1080/23322039.2025.2467882. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23322039.2025.2467882 C. Forliano, E. Battisti, P. de Bernardi, and T. Kliestik, “Mapping the greenwashing research landscape: a theoretical and field analysis,” Review of Managerial Science . Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s11846-025-00856-3 J. K. Roy and L. Vasa, “Financial technology and environmental, social and governance in sustainable finance: a bibliometric and thematic content analysis,” Discover Sustainability , vol. 6, no. 1. Springer Nature, Dec. 01, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s43621-025-00934-2 R. Karim, M. M. Roshid, and A. Waaje, “Does the Firm Size Matter for Financial Performance? — Evidence from the Financial Sector of a South Asian Emerging Economy,” in EMIDWORLD 2nd International Congress on Economics Public Finance Business & Social Sciences , Istanbul, 2025, pp. 461–474. A. Pritchard, “Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics,” Journal of Documentation , pp. 348–349, 1969, Available: https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1190144. [Accessed: Feb. 06, 2025] H. Keathley-Herring, E. Van Aken, F. Gonzalez-Aleu, F. Deschamps, G. Letens, and P. C. Orlandini, “Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework,” Scientometrics , vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 927–951, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x. [Accessed: Oct. 18, 2024] S. M. Lawani, “Bibliometrics: Its Theoretical Foundations, Methods and Applications,” Libri , vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 294–315, Jan. 1981, doi: 10.1515/LIBR.1981.31.1.294/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS. Available: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/libr.1981.31.1.294/html. [Accessed: Oct. 18, 2024] K. Salinas-Ríos and A. J. G. López, “Bibliometrics, a useful tool within the field of research,” Journal of Basic and Applied Psychology Research , vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 9–16, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.29057/JBAPR.V3I6.6829. Available: https://repository.uaeh.edu.mx/revistas/index.php/jbapr/article/view/6829. [Accessed: Oct. 18, 2024] Md. M. Roshid, R. Karim, A. Waaje, S. Islam, and R. C. Bhowmik, “Mapping the carbon finance research: A bibliometric exploration of innovation in sustainable finance,” Development and Sustainability in Economics and Finance , vol. 5, p. 100048, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.DSEF.2025.100048. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2950524025000083. [Accessed: Feb. 17, 2025] M. M. Roshid, R. Karim, and A. Waaje, “Synergizing Circular Economy and H2H Marketing: A Sustainable Approach to Human-Centric Business,” in EMIDWORLD 2nd International Congress on Economics Public Finance Business & Social Sciences , Istanbul, 2025, pp. 767–783. Available: www.emidworld.com N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J Bus Res , vol. 133, pp. 285–296, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.04.070 D. Mishra, Z. Luo, S. Jiang, T. Papadopoulos, and R. Dubey, “A bibliographic study on big data: concepts, trends and challenges,” Business Process Management Journal , vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 555–573, 2017, doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-10-2015-0149/FULL/XML D. Jurgens, S. Kumar, R. Hoover, D. McFarland, and D. Jurafsky, “Measuring the Evolution of a Scientific Field through Citation Frames,” Trans Assoc Comput Linguist , vol. 6, pp. 391–406, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1162/TACL_A_00028. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00028. [Accessed: Oct. 18, 2024] C. Vindrola-Padros and G. A. Johnson, “Rapid Techniques in Qualitative Research: A Critical Review of the Literature,” https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320921835 , vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1596–1604, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1049732320921835. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049732320921835. [Accessed: Oct. 18, 2024] C. Weismayer and I. Pezenka, “Identifying emerging research fields: a longitudinal latent semantic keyword analysis,” Scientometrics , vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 1757–1785, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1007/S11192-017-2555-Z/METRICS. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-017-2555-z. [Accessed: Oct. 18, 2024] A. Kolk and P. Perego, “Sustainable Bonuses: Sign of Corporate Responsibility or Window Dressing?,” Journal of Business Ethics , vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1007/S10551-012-1614-X R. E. Freeman and S. Dmytriyev, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory: Learning From Each Other,” Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management , no. 1, pp. 7–15, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.4468/2017.1.02FREEMAN.DMYTRIYEV R. Agrawal, N. Islam, A. Samadhiya, V. Shukla, A. Kumar, and A. Upadhyay, “Paving the way to environmental sustainability: A systematic review to integrate big data analytics into high-stake decision forecasting,” Technol Forecast Soc Change , vol. 214, p. 124060, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2025.124060 G. O. Ogundajo, R. I. Akintoye, O. Abiola, A. Ajibade, M. I. Olayinka, and A. Akintola, “Influence of country governance factors and national culture on corporate sustainability practice: an inter-Country study,” Cogent Business & Management , vol. 9, no. 1, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2130149. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23311975.2022.2130149. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025] R. V. Aguilera, J. A. Aragón-Correa, V. Marano, and P. A. Tashman, “The Corporate Governance of Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Proposal for More Integrated Research,” J Manage , vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1468–1497, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0149206321991212 D. M. Salvioni, F. Gennari, and L. Bosetti, “Sustainability and Convergence: The Future of Corporate Governance Systems?,” Sustainability 2016, Vol. 8, Page 1203 , vol. 8, no. 11, p. 1203, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.3390/SU8111203. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/11/1203/htm. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025] G. Ou, K. Zhao, R. Zuo, and J. Wu, “Effects of research funding on the academic impact and societal visibility of scientific research,” J Informetr , vol. 18, no. 4, p. 101592, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.JOI.2024.101592 G. Dicuonzo, F. Donofrio, A. P. Iannuzzi, and V. Dell’Atti, “The integration of sustainability in corporate governance systems: an innovative framework applied to the European systematically important banks,” International Journal of Disclosure and Governance , vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 249–263, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1057/S41310-021-00140-2/FIGURES/2. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41310-021-00140-2. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025] I. Hristov and C. Searcy, “Integrating sustainability with corporate governance: a framework to implement the corporate sustainability reporting directive through a balanced scorecard,” Management Decision , vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 443–467, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1108/MD-10-2023-1995/FULL/XML I. M. García-Sánchez, N. Hussain, C. Aibar-Guzmán, and B. Aibar-Guzmán, “Assurance of corporate social responsibility reports: Does it reduce decoupling practices?,” Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility , vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 118–138, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1111/BEER.12394. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/beer.12394. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025] M. Z. Kazemi, A. A. Elamer, G. Theodosopoulos, and S. F. A. Khatib, “Reinvigorating research on sustainability reporting in the construction industry: A systematic review and future research agenda,” J Bus Res , vol. 167, p. 114145, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2023.114145 A. A. Gull, A. Abid, K. Hussainey, T. Ahsan, and A. Haque, “Corporate governance reforms and risk disclosure quality: evidence from an emerging economy,” Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 331–354, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1108/JAEE-11-2021-0378/FULL/PDF M. M. Roshid, A. Waaje, and R. Karim, “Industry 6.0 as an Emerging Field of Research: A Systematic and Bibliometric Analysis,” in EMIDWORLD 2nd International Congress on Economics Public Finance Business & Social Sciences , Istanbul, 2025, pp. 784–802. A. Anand, P. Argade, R. Barkemeyer, and F. Salignac, “Trends and patterns in sustainable entrepreneurship research: A bibliometric review and research agenda,” J Bus Ventur , vol. 36, no. 3, p. 106092, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.JBUSVENT.2021.106092 N. Saini and M. Singhania, “Corporate governance, globalization and firm performance in emerging economies: Evidence from India,” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management , vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 1310–1333, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-04-2017-0091 S. K. Kakar et al. , “Corporate Governance, Risk Management, and Bank Performance: Does Type of Ownership Matter?,” Journal of Financial Risk Management , vol. 10, no. 03, pp. 342–366, 2021, doi: 10.4236/jfrm.2021.103020 R. Karim, Md. M. Roshid, B. K. Dhar, Md. Nahiduzzaman, and B. C. Kuri, “Audit Committee Characteristics and Sustainable Firms’ Performance: Evidence From the Financial Sector in Bangladesh,” Business Strategy & Development , vol. 7, no. 4, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1002/bsd2.70059. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bsd2.70059 F. Wu, “China’s Emergent City-Region Governance: A New Form of State Spatial Selectivity through State-orchestrated Rescaling,” Int J Urban Reg Res , vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1134–1151, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12437. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-2427.12437. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025] D. C. North, “Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance,” Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance , Oct. 1990, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511808678. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/institutions-institutional-change-and-economic-performance/AAE1E27DF8996E24C5DD07EB79BBA7EE. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025] P. M. Clarkson, Y. Li, G. D. Richardson, and F. P. Vasvari, “Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis,” Accounting, Organizations and Society , vol. 33, no. 4–5, pp. 303–327, May 2008, doi: 10.1016/J.AOS.2007.05.003 S. L. Gillan, A. Koch, and L. T. Starks, “Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance,” Journal of Corporate Finance , vol. 66, p. 101889, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.JCORPFIN.2021.101889 A. Z. Amir and G. Serafeim, “Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey,” Financial Analysts Journal , vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 87–103, 2018, doi: 10.2469/FAJ.V74.N3.2 T. Lim, “Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and artificial intelligence in finance: State-of-the-art and research takeaways,” Artificial Intelligence Review 2024 57:4 , vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1–64, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/S10462-024-10708-3. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-024-10708-3. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025] R. E. Freeman, “THE STAKEHOLDER APPROACH,” Strategic Management , pp. 1–2, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139192675.003 H. M. Chen, T. C. Kuo, and J. L. Chen, “Impacts on the ESG and financial performances of companies in the manufacturing industry based on the climate change related risks,” J Clean Prod , vol. 380, p. 134951, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.134951 S. E-Vahdati, N. Zulkifli, and Z. Zakaria, “Corporate governance integration with sustainability: a systematic literature review,” Corporate Governance (Bingley) , vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 255–269, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1108/CG-03-2018-0111/FULL/XML N. O. D. Ellili, “Bibliometric analysis on corporate governance topics published in the journal of Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society,” Corporate Governance (Bingley) , vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 262–286, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1108/CG-03-2022-0135/FULL/XML S. Y. Enciso-Alfaro and I. M. García-Sánchez, “Corporate governance and environmental sustainability: Addressing the dual theme from a bibliometric approach,” Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag , vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1025–1041, May 2023, doi: 10.1002/CSR.2403. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/csr.2403. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025] Z. Zhu, Y. Jin, Y. Su, K. Jia, C. L. Lin, and X. Liu, “Bibliometric-Based Evaluation of the Neuromarketing Research Trend: 2010–2021,” Front Psychol , vol. 13, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872468 E. V. Raudales-Garcia, J. V. Acosta-Tzin, and P. A. Aguilar-Hernández, “Economía circular: una revisión bibliométrica y sistemática,” Región Científica , vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 2024192–2024192, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.58763/RC2024192. Available: https://rc.cienciasas.org/index.php/rc/article/view/192/281. [Accessed: Aug. 08, 2024] D. Mallick and A. Rahman, “Inclusive Economic Growth and Climate-Resilient Development in Bangladesh,” Bangladesh’s Economic and Social Progress: From a Basket Case to a Development Model , pp. 89–114, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-1683-2_3. Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-1683-2_3. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025] B. I. Chigbu and F. Nekhwevha, “Exploring the concepts of decent work through the lens of SDG 8: addressing challenges and inadequacies,” Frontiers in Sociology , vol. 8, p. 1266141, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.3389/FSOC.2023.1266141/BIBTEX M. A. Razzaque, S. H. Bidisha, and B. H. Khondker, “Exchange Rate and Economic Growth,” Journal of South Asian Development , vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 42–64, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0973174117702712. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0973174117702712. [Accessed: Mar. 01, 2025] R. Karim, M. Roshid, and A. Waaje, “Circular Economy and Supply Chain Sustainability,” in Strategic Innovations for Dynamic Supply Chains , 2024, pp. 1–30. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-3575-8.ch001. Available: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/979-8-3693-3575-8.ch001 T. Tanchangya, M. R. Mia, M. M. Roshid, J. Chakma, F. Islam, and M. H. Rahman, “Role of green financing and energy production to mitigate climate change in emerging economy like Bangladesh,” International Journal of Sustainable Energy and Environmental Research , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 114–139, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.18488/13.v13i2.3935. Available: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/13/article/view/3935 R. Karim, Md. M. Hasan, A. Waaje, Mst. S. H. Yesmin, and Md. M. Roshid, “Financial Performance of Bangladeshi Listed Commercial Banks: A Generation-based Analysis,” International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147–4486) , vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 46–56, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.20525/ijfbs.v12i4.3170. Available: https://ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/view/3170 S. A. Cruz, “SDG 17 and global partnership for sustainable development: unraveling the rhetoric of collaboration,” Front Environ Sci , vol. 11, 2023, doi: 10.3389/FENVS.2023.1155828/PDF. Available: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1155828. [Accessed: Jan. 07, 2025] Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6747329","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Systematic Review","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":461732842,"identity":"83d37851-5dd5-46d5-9e27-afcc1db3ea69","order_by":0,"name":"Joshep Marua","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Bharathidasan University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Joshep","middleName":"","lastName":"Marua","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-05-26 05:46:40","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6747329/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6747329/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":83553060,"identity":"b800d7ef-fa54-4578-888a-dff5a93890a6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-28 10:56:50","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":152603,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAnnual Scientific Production\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6747329/v1/95149977aec305c6f843eb4f.png"},{"id":83553497,"identity":"a7c5d46d-6f7a-4a04-b5d7-59d899ba8d37","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-28 11:04:50","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":48274,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTop 25 Countries Scientific Production\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6747329/v1/4d0320f71c6b768d0c3534e1.png"},{"id":83553062,"identity":"ace0f86c-198a-4102-9077-0b35c260b443","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-28 10:56:50","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":36210,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAverage Citations Per Year\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6747329/v1/5e2f78fd110a24db9a0b3165.png"},{"id":83553064,"identity":"913dd766-ea5b-406e-803f-1100d890fc13","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-28 10:56:50","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":63403,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTop cited countries\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6747329/v1/790e71b7843ce4c90407cea0.png"},{"id":83553067,"identity":"fd240e74-92ab-4919-9355-3c97244c7cca","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-28 10:56:50","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":148254,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTop 25 Relevant Sources\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6747329/v1/b462dd314a381db3e7e87480.png"},{"id":83553068,"identity":"c28fb962-760c-499d-af8a-57193b2781c9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-28 10:56:50","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":67676,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMost Contributing Authors\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6747329/v1/ed4193f6ea6155b5451f6dab.png"},{"id":83553499,"identity":"fb53cb64-2352-489f-a193-4f9af8fe00f7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-28 11:04:50","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":56525,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMost Frequent Word\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6747329/v1/9c0bec10fb256094378ecc36.png"},{"id":83553070,"identity":"e3c4c67b-f217-40d7-9265-9b844d506b67","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-28 10:56:50","extension":"jpg","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":36608,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWord Tree Map\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"8.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6747329/v1/a1e72493bce569d964623808.jpg"},{"id":83553500,"identity":"8a40d733-e39d-4913-8206-39727032299c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-28 11:04:50","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"Figure 9","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":111078,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThematic Map\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"9.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6747329/v1/ef9dc693523936e62c45ebb6.png"},{"id":83553069,"identity":"771c5d8a-3576-4838-b878-0b3851b13422","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-28 10:56:50","extension":"png","order_by":10,"title":"Figure 10","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":48587,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTrending Topics\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"10.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6747329/v1/7b69a5ae2200540488d5cb33.png"},{"id":83553073,"identity":"cf18e8c6-eed5-4deb-b5e3-004338318afe","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-28 10:56:50","extension":"png","order_by":11,"title":"Figure 11","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":611403,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eCo-occurrence of Keywords Network\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"11.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6747329/v1/f4880e6eba16ea5f37e9e16b.png"},{"id":83553502,"identity":"c87abf0a-6617-4b41-b9fb-5004e2ea136d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-28 11:04:50","extension":"png","order_by":12,"title":"Figure 12","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":683963,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eBibliometric Coupling Author Network\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"12.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6747329/v1/7bbd58b4ae7834da56c5899e.png"},{"id":83554367,"identity":"ec4bd1c8-583f-46f5-9e31-5d98b35d456f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-28 11:12:50","extension":"png","order_by":13,"title":"Figure 13","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":897526,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eBibliometric Coupling Country Network\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"13.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6747329/v1/dc097218a92cbd48d6199c1f.png"},{"id":83554493,"identity":"1cc506b9-1575-493e-b76e-473b819f6b70","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-28 11:20:53","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":3843364,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6747329/v1/237d1004-ff6a-4966-80e7-3933a9730622.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCorporate Social Responsibility and SDGs: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends, Thematic Evolution, and Future Directions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"1.0 Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eModern business practice has brought SDGs and Corporate Social Responsibility together as interdependent practices. Corporate Social Responsibility functions through mechanisms along with processes and relationships which offer stakeholder oversight for responsible management of corporations [1]. The concept of SDGs brings together environmental considerations and social aspects with governance elements to develop enduring economy and society as well as environmental growth [2], [3]. The fusion between corporate SDGs and economic SDGs received rising interest during the recent years because companies face mounting pressure to prove social responsibility alongside financial success. Organizations use Corporate Social Responsibility systems for defining their sustainable policies through their impact on strategic choices and risk management and social conduct [4]. The systematic evaluation of research patterns and structural development in this field is possible through bibliometric analysis which presents itself as an established evaluation method. Quantitative methods allow this analysis to show how scholarly work relates to each other and what prominent authors are while revealing new topics [5], [6]. Corporations controlled by good governance standards improve SDGs reporting and performance which brings a positive impact on sustainable development [7], [8]. Through bibliometric analysis researchers now have the ability to study how board diversity along with stakeholder engagement along with corporate social responsibility (CSR) has transformed since the start of SDGs discussions [9], [10]. Research experts study citation networks as well as co-authoring relationships to recognize unexplored areas and present upcoming academic pathways that boost Corporate Social Responsibility SDGs performance [11].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnnually growing global corporate economy requires academics policymakers and practitioners to focus intensely on the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs. The traditional Corporate Social Responsibility structures have adapted to incorporate SDGs principles because businesses face rising responsibility to demonstrate social and environmental impact alongside ethical conduct [12], [13]. The fundamental change in the research field demands an extensive knowledge of thematic evolution patterns alongside research patterns and future directions in this cross-disciplinary field. The traditional focus of Corporate Social Responsibility towards enhancing shareholder value and agency problem mitigation extends to embrace environmental social governance (ESG) elements [14], [15]. Saints-based integration in Corporate Social Responsibility helps managers tackle stakeholder competition while sustaining business benefits over extended periods. The research and practical challenges regarding SDGs governance stem from a deficiency of universal governance model standards [16]. The mapping capability of bibliometric analysis helps researchers track scholarly development along with major research subjects in this academic field. The researchers use quantitative methods to analyze academic literature and networked co-citation and keyword co-occurrence to establish connections between governance systems and sustainable business approaches [17]. Along with identifying new research clusters this exploration intends to deliver valuable recommendations for business executives and public officials [18]. Research becomes essential because global SDGs problems such as climate change and social inequality and corporate ethics have become increasingly complex. Strong governance structures are required to handle these issues while simultaneously promoting innovation together with resilience [19], [20], [21]. Due to the fast-growing number of ESG reporting requirements and regulations companies need thorough understanding of how board members executive leaders and institutional investors can properly make SDGs decisions [22], [23]. SDGs research combines dynamic interdisciplinary work along with technological progress into one field which demands researchers to analyze existing literature holistically for detecting missing elements and prospective research pathways [24]. The study will advance sustainable Corporate Social Responsibility knowledge through bibliometric analysis to create a foundation for theory development and practice [25].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis research investigates the academic relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs by studying publication patterns along with thematic trends and projected scholarly development. The study examines field intellectual structure to identify authors and institutions together with journals while revealing new clusters so it can unify governance mechanisms with sustainable practices. This research investigates three important areas about SDGs framework development and regional market changes and their impact on corporate decision processes driven by ESG considerations. The study exists to respond to three key global developments which include SDGs requirements alongside efforts to prevent greenwashing while seeking evidence-based policy solutions. A systematic evaluation in this research contributes essential knowledge to academics and policymakers and business executives for designing governance frameworks which simultaneously boost environmental responsibility alongside social accountability and better corporate transparency [26], [27], [28], [29].\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2.0 Methodology","content":"\u003cp\u003eMethods from bibliometric analysis have been used to study Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs research from 1994 to 2025. Bibliometric analysis serves as an established quantitative research method for scholarly literature tracking and measuring which [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [30] first invented and [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [31], [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [32] and [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [33] have extensively used to explore research field growth. The method helps researchers discover leading authors together with notable journals and research subject evolution which makes it vital for visualizing field direction and new trends [34], [35]. The decision to choose Scopus stems from its broad literature coverage in academic peer-reviewed research that extends to research papers and conference proceedings as well as books and reviews. Scopus provides reliable metadata about scholarly impact assessment and collaboration networks due to its comprehensive citation relationships and author affiliation information [36], [37]. The research used \u0026ldquo;Corporate Social Responsibility\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;SDGs\u0026rdquo; search terms which were refined by selecting Business, Management, Accounting, Economics and Finance documents while limiting results to English-language materials and resulting in 6,008 records from 1,307 sources. Changes in this scholarly field show a 20.5% yearly expansion which is supported by documents being relatively new at 4.53 years on average and receiving 23.21 references per document. The research includes 11,589 authors comprised of 934 single-authors while the references reach 328,197 which represents the high level of academic information exchange. Results of collaborative analysis show that international co-authorship occurs in 27.95% of documents which have an average 2.68 external contributors per document thus indicating strong global research collaboration. The research output demonstrates diversity because journal articles 4714 represent the largest category followed by book Chaps.\u0026nbsp;726 and then books 185, conference papers 146 and review papers 237. Research on customer-centric retailing applies both performance analysis and science mapping methodologies according to [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [36] and [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [38] and [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [39] and [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [40] to investigate core researchers and notable journals together with citation patterns and thematic evolutions. Research achievement analysis evaluates the publication frequency of institutions and countries as well as journals yet science mapping through networks of co-citations and keyword and bibliographic coupling displays conceptual shifts and thematic progression. The research utilizes Biblioshiny for thematic mapping and co-citation network visualization and VOSviewer for keyword overlay visualization and bibliometric coupling as part of its data visualization process through R.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDemographic Information\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescription\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eResults\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTimespan\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1994:2025\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSources (Journals, Books, etc)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1307\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDocuments\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6008\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnnual Growth Rate %\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDocument Average Age\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.53\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAverage citations per doc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e23.21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e328197\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDOCUMENT CONTENTS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKeywords Plus (ID)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2192\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAuthor's Keywords (DE)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9809\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAUTHORS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAuthors\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11589\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAuthors of single-authored docs\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e934\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAUTHORS COLLABORATION\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSingle-authored docs\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1164\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCo-Authors per Doc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.68\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInternational co-authorships %\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e27.95\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDOCUMENT TYPES\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003earticle\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4714\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ebook\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e185\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ebook chapter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e726\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003econference paper\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e146\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ereview\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e237\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"3.0 Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe bibliometric analysis contains five main sections about Total Production of Scientific Literature and Journal Level and Author Level and Document Level and Thematic Level. The scientific research output consists of all literature which gets produced according to country, affiliation and sponsoring agency. This research implements collaboration between numerous affiliations and countries across the globe. We evaluate the journals and the leader identification process depends on measuring scientific output quantity. Organize and apply data regarding fractionalized articles to determine main authorship. In this research component. The study piece occupies the highest position in green finance research because it receives the most local citations. Multiple bibliometric approaches comprising theme Map and Thematic Evolution Map and Co-word analysis and Co-citation analysis were applied for science mapping to develop theme clusters and future research directions on carbon finance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.1 Annual Scientific and Countries Production Over-Time\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, the research publication about Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs shows exponential growth in scholarly outputs from 2010 until a peak occurred in 2025 before a substantial decrease appears. The data shows that academic interest in governance mechanisms together with ESG frameworks and corporate SDGs disclosure practices is accelerating because of regulatory shifts and investor demands and the SDG framework. Research in sustainable corporate practices requires study to determine if the 2025 peak signifies terminations in policy changes or corporate alignment with new priorities. The study introduces new insights to identify quick changes in research trends that influence sustainable corporate management. Future research must evaluate citation relationships between papers and institutional partnership patterns while investigating new ESG reporting methods and stakeholder capitalism models along with green financial systems. The analysis would benefit from references including [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [41] on corporate SDGs reporting as well as [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [7] on integrated reporting to understand this bibliometric assessment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e the visual depiction of scientific productivity displays China extending its lead while the UK and Indonesia maintain positions behind it and the USA takes the third spot. An overlay Pareto line demonstrates the total amount of scientific output each country produces. The distribution reveals substantial differences in research production because several nations maintain major control over worldwide scientific literature while Lotka\u0026rsquo;s Law of scientific productivity applies here. This analysis presents original findings by demonstrating the higher research output performances of Indonesia and Malaysia while surpassing traditional scientific powers of Germany and France. The new global research structure shows signs of evolving due to rising investment and improved institutional backing together with better digital platforms for research. Academic citations originating from regions producing many research publications can affect worldwide citation networks by making the Matthew Effect stronger in academic impact. Future studies should examine relationships between funding allocations and research organization strength as well as their combined role in promoting citational effects for a complete understanding of the findings.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.2 Average Citations and Most Citated Countries\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe research on Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs has progressed markedly, characterized by various phases of development and theme transitions. In Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e The initial period (1994\u0026ndash;2005) experienced intermittent contributions, culminating in a pivotal study in 2000 that attained a Mean Total Citation per Article (MeanTCperArt) of 1,477, signifying its foundational influence. From 2006 to 2016, research activity surged, escalating from 18 articles in 2006 to 203 in 2016, while citation impact remained substantial, reaching a zenith of 136.72 in 2006. This era signified the integration of SDGs into governance frameworks, consistent with earlier systematic assessments [42], [43]. Beginning in 2017, publication volume escalated, peaking at 1,371 in 2024, while citation impact diminished MeanTCperArt decreased to 2.93, signifying scientific fragmentation. This pattern reflects other bibliometric assessments, indicating a transition from basic research to specialized investigations. Thematic progression underscores a shift from conventional governance structures to cohesive ESG frameworks, stakeholder theory, and adherence to regulatory standards.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e Total citations (TC) and average article citations indicate the quantity and significance of research output among countries, providing insights into academic influence and knowledge distribution in this domain. The United Kingdom (UK), United States (USA), and Australia are the biggest contributors, with citation totals of 15,529, 14,483, and 10,013, respectively. Canada 54.90, Germany 52.80, and France 50.20 demonstrate elevated average citations per publication, reflecting substantial scholarly influence and notable research quality. This pattern corresponds with other research [44], [45], which underscores the critical influence of institutions in these nations on Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs frameworks. China 7,561 and Malaysia 3,219 have an increasing research presence; nonetheless, their lower average article citations 14.40 and 13.50, respectively indicate a developing academic impact. In contrast, Belgium 71.20 excels in average citations, perhaps attributable to significant cooperation and the incorporation of Corporate Social Responsibility within European SDGs frameworks [46]. Emerging economies like India 11.00, Indonesia 7.60, and Saudi Arabia 9.30 demonstrate diminished citation effect despite increasing research involvement. This indicates possible deficiencies in international academic cooperation, research output quality, and policy execution. The comparatively low citation counts of Pakistan 23.10 and Iran 26.30 correspond with prior findings by [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [47], underscoring difficulties in research funding and global visibility. The variation in research effect throughout areas signifies a necessity for improved collaboration between prominent research centers and developing contributions. Enhancing multidisciplinary methodologies, advocating for open-access distribution, and cultivating collaborations between industry and academia could address these disparities. This bibliometric assessment underscores the preeminence of Western economies in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs studies, alongside significant contributions from Asia-Pacific countries. Despite citation differences, enhanced worldwide cooperation and institutional backing may foster a more inclusive and influential research environment. Conforming to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and governance frameworks would be crucial for directing the forthcoming phase of research advancement in this field.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.3 Most Relevant Sources and Impact\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure \u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e highlights the preeminence of renowned academic publications that significantly contribute to the discourse on Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs. Corporate Social Responsibility (Bingley) is the most prolific source, with 193 publications, underscoring its pivotal role in establishing governance paradigms and regulatory frameworks. Likewise, CSR, SDGs, Ethics, and Governance 182 articles underscores the importance of ethical corporate conduct and sustainable business practices, highlighting the nexus between governance frameworks and corporate social responsibility (CSR). The prevalence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (158 articles) and Business Strategy and the Environment 106 articles indicates a growing academic emphasis on the integration of governance systems with environmental SDGs. Prestigious journals like the Journal of Business Ethics 97 articles and Corporate Social Responsibility: An International Review 91 articles substantiate the ethical aspects of governance research, reflecting a persistent focus on ethical leadership, stakeholder involvement, and sustainable decision-making. The Journal of Cleaner Production 65 articles emphasize the significance of governance in promoting cleaner production and SDGs-oriented corporate practices. Thematic progression in this field illustrates the increasing connections among governance, SDGs, finance, and risk management. Publications like the Journal of Risk and Financial Management 91 articles and Finance Research Letters 61 articles underscore the financial ramifications of governance practices, demonstrating the impact of SDGs imperatives on corporate financial performance, risk evaluation, and investment strategies. The contributions from the International Review of Financial Analysis 46 articles, Research in International Business and Finance 38 articles, and Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment 33 articles indicate a thematic transition towards sustainable financial practices, ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investments, and impact-oriented financial decision-making. These findings correspond with existing literature that supports the incorporation of SDGs factors into corporate financial governance frameworks [48], [49]. The bibliometric analysis reveals a growing academic interest in governance systems across various SDGs contexts, but many gaps persist. Although many studies emphasize financial governance and ESG integration, scant attention has been directed on the impact of digital transformation and artificial intelligence on the SDGs of Corporate Social Responsibility. Emerging technologies, including blockchain for transparency and AI-driven risk assessment, require additional investigation. Secondly, although journals such as the Journal of Governance and Regulation 44 articles and the SDGs Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 40 articles have made substantial contributions, regulatory perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility within SDGs transitions remain inadequately examined. Comparative governance frameworks across various regulatory systems may yield enhanced understanding of policy efficacy. Finally, the amalgamation of governance and circular economy techniques constitutes an emerging study domain. Publications like the Journal of Cleaner Production and Corporate Ownership and Control 47 articles suggest the importance of sustainable production and ownership frameworks; however, further empirical research is required to investigate the influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on the promotion of circular economy implementation and SDGs-focused business models. This bibliometric analysis provides a thorough assessment of Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs research, highlighting principal publishing sources, theme developments, and prospective research directions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e delineates the principal findings of prominent journals that contribute to research on Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs. The Journal of Business Ethics (h-index\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;51, TC\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;11,863) is the preeminent publication, prioritizing ethical decision-making in Corporate Social Responsibility, succeeded by Business Strategy and the Environment (h-index\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;44, TC\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7,192), which concentrates on business strategy and environmental SDGs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (h-index\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;42, TC\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7,284) and Corporate Social Responsibility: An International Review (h-index\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;36, TC\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5,370) offer insights into SDGs reporting and stakeholder engagement, corroborating prior bibliometric analyses [50]. The thematic evolution indicates a transition towards integrated reporting, corporate social responsibility (CSR), and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics, as evidenced by Corporate Social Responsibility (Bingley) (h-index\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;37, NP\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;193) and Journal of Cleaner Production (h-index\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;37, TC\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;4,952). This corresponds with meta-analytical assessments (Friede, Busch, \u0026amp; Bassen, 2015) that associate company governance with ESG performance. New study areas encompass digital governance, AI-enhanced corporate decision-making, and the influence of financial technology on sustainable governance, as evidenced by Finance study Letters (h-index\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;15, TC\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;686) and Journal of Risk and Financial Management (h-index\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16, TC\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;908). Furthermore, contributions from Cogent Business and Management (h-index\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;18, NP\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;155) underscore the increasing multidisciplinary character of Corporate Social Responsibility research. The concordance of findings with prior bibliometric studies confirms the strength of the research landscape, indicating sustained scholarly focus on the integration of governance processes with SDGs goals, hence enhancing academic and policy-making discussions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSources Impact Overtime\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"7\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSources\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eh_index\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eg_index\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003em_index\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNP\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePY_start\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJournal of Business Ethics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e51\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e97\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.217\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11863\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e97\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2003\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBusiness Strategy and the Environment\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e44\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e84\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.375\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7192\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e106\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1994\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e84\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.471\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7284\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e158\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2009\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCorporate Social Responsibility (Bingley)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e56\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.643\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4180\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e193\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2012\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJournal of Cleaner Production\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e65\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.542\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4952\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e65\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2002\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCorporate Social Responsibility: An International Review\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e73\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.286\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5370\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e91\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1998\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSocial Responsibility Journal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e22\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.048\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1368\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e55\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2005\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJournal of Management and Governance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e45\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.84\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2107\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e55\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMeditari Accountancy Research\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.75\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1677\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e55\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2014\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInternational Journal of Accounting\u0026nbsp;\u0026amp;\u0026nbsp;Information Management\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.222\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1384\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e39\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2017\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eManagement decision\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1786\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e46\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2006\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSDGs Accounting, Management and Policy Journal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e19\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.188\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1785\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2010\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCogent Business \u0026amp; Management\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e29\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1297\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e155\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2017\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJournal of Financial Reporting and Accounting\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e914\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e61\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2018\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInternational Review of Financial Analysis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.231\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1612\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e46\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2013\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJournal of Risk and Financial Management\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e27\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.286\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e908\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e91\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2019\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinance Research Letters\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.875\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e686\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e61\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2018\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJournal of Business Research\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.154\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1012\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2013\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eResearch in International Business and Finance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e35\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1255\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e38\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2011\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInternational Journal of Disclosure and Governance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.824\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e853\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e59\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2009\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJournal of Accounting in Emerging Economies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e26\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.556\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e693\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e32\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2017\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJournal of Corporate Finance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.273\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2009\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2015\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBusiness \u0026amp; Society\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.619\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1246\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2005\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEconomic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e19\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.444\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e409\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e24\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2017\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInternational Journal of Emerging Markets\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e19\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.625\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e374\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2018\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(TC\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Total Citation, PY\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Publication Year, NP\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Number of Publication).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.4 Most Contributing Authors\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnalysis of Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e reveals Velte P as the preeminent author in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs research, boasting 31.5 fractionalized publications, markedly exceeding Clarke T 15.2, Idowu SO 12.2, Hussainey K 11.7, and Ingley C 11.2. Velte's significant contributions to ESG performance and governance frameworks correspond with previous research highlighting the influence of governance structures on business SDGs. Clarke and Idowu's emphasis on regulatory frameworks and SDGs reporting underscores the multidisciplinary aspect of this research, as noted in [51]. The involvement of Hussainey K and Ingley C, recognized for their contributions to governance transparency and board efficacy, signifies a global research impact, especially in emerging economies where governance disclosure affects corporate SDGs [52]. Authors such as Treepongkaruna S 8.3, Garc\u0026iacute;a-S\u0026aacute;nchez IM 7.8, and Jarboui A 7.2 demonstrate an increasing focus on financial stability, organizational risk, and ethical decision-making in SDGs frameworks. The bibliometric trends indicate a concentration of study within a few numbers of prolific experts, underscoring the necessity for expanded interdisciplinary collaboration.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e: Authors\u0026rsquo; Impact Analysis evaluates prominent researchers in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs using essential bibliometric metrics, including the h-index, g-index, m-index, total citations (TC), number of publications (NP), and publication year (PY_start). The results offer significant insights on research productivity, impact, and the development of academic contributions in this field. The analysis indicates that Velte P possesses an h-index of 19, a g-index of 38, and total citations (TC) of 2183, demonstrating a significant scholarly impact since 2014. His substantial publication record (NP\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;38) indicates a consistent research contribution to Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs. Hussainey K and Garc\u0026iacute;a-S\u0026aacute;nchez I-M demonstrate considerable research influence, possessing h-indices of 17 and 16, respectively, along with notable total citations of 1438 and 1361. Their contributions, commencing in 2015 and 2013, respectively, signify a sustained commitment to the advancement of SDGs-related governance research. Elamer AA and Khatib SFA are distinguished among rising researchers due to their elevated m-indices of 1.714 and 2.0, respectively, indicating significant academic impact in relation to their career duration. The involvement of writers like Albitar K and Treepongkaruna S, who possess significant h-indices and g-indices, underscores an increasing emphasis on Corporate Social Responsibility research from a SDGs viewpoint in recent years. Thematic analysis reveals that governance mechanisms, disclosure methods, and the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors have emerged as the predominant study issues. Researchers such Maroun W, Ntim CG, and Zaman R have made substantial contributions in various fields, as demonstrated by their notable citation impact and consistent publication record. The variation in PY among authors highlights the interdisciplinary character of Corporate Social Responsibility research, with both early contributors (Rezaee Z, Mersland R) and newer newcomers (Hussain N, Salehi M) influencing the field's development. These findings correspond with earlier bibliometric studies on Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs, highlighting the influence of prolific scholars in molding academic discourse. The preeminence of high-impact scholars corresponds with other bibliometric studies [53], [54] that highlight the growing incorporation of governance and SDGs indicators in corporate strategy research. Furthermore, the citation trends and research productivity indicate that the subject has experienced significant expansion, propelled by new SDGs issues and global regulatory advancements.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAuthors\u0026rsquo; Impact\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"7\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAuthor\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eh_index\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eg_index\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003em_index\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNP\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePY_start\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVelte P\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e19\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e38\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.583\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2183\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e38\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2014\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHussainey K\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.545\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1438\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2015\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGarc\u0026iacute;a-S\u0026aacute;nchez I-M\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.231\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1361\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2013\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNtim CG\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2012\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2013\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eElamer AA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.714\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e825\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2019\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJiraporn P\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e371\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e24\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2018\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJarboui A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e19\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.571\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e381\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2019\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMaroun W\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.846\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e598\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2013\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlbitar K\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.667\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e704\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2020\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKhatib SFA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e753\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2021\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMartinez-Ferrero J\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.909\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e932\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2015\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRezaee Z\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.714\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e874\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2012\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTreepongkaruna S\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e319\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2021\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWang Y\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.111\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e418\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e24\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2017\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eZaman R\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.111\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e935\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2017\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGallego-\u0026Aacute;lvarez I\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.692\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e272\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2013\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLi Y\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.125\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e900\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2018\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNadeem M\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e601\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2017\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSalehi M\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.125\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e250\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2018\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAguilera RV\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.615\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e716\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2013\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlmaqtari FA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.143\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e205\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2019\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDe Villiers C\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.727\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e541\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2015\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHussain N\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1125\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2018\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLi Z\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e530\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2016\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMersland R\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.471\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e845\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2009\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"7\"\u003e(TC\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Total Citation, PY\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Publication Year, NP\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Number of Publication)\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe bibliometric examination of Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs underscores substantial contributions from institutions in Asia and Europe. Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e: Most Significant Affiliations, with the University of Sfax (Tunisia) at the forefront, succeeded by Malaysian institutions including Universiti Teknologi MARA, Universiti Utara Malaysia, and Universiti Sains Malaysia. These universities have an increasing focus on sustainable governance in the realm of emerging markets. The University of Portsmouth and the University of Southampton significantly contribute, reflecting the United Kingdom's leadership in incorporating SDGs into governance frameworks. Chinese and Indonesian institutions, such as the University of International Business and Economics and Airlangga University, demonstrate an increasing focus on sustainable governance in swiftly advancing economies. The topic progression indicates a transition from initial studies centered on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) to more extensive analyses of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards, SDGs reporting, and governance frameworks that influence sustainable development. The prevalence of Asian institutions indicates the increasing impact of developing economies in establishing global governance standards, consistent with previous research highlighting SDGs disclosures and governance practices in these areas.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMost Relevant Affiliation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAffiliation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCountry\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eArticles\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversity of Sfax\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTunisia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e94\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversiti Teknologi MARA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMalaysia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e92\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversiti Utara Malaysia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMalaysia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e76\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversity of Portsmouth\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnited Kingdom\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e74\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversiti Sains Malaysia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMalaysia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e70\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversiti Malaysia Terengganu\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMalaysia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e55\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversiti Putra Malaysia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMalaysia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e51\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChulalongkorn University\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThailand\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e49\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversity of Southampton\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnited Kingdom\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e45\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRMIT University\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAustralia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversity of Groningen\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNetherlands\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e41\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversity of International Business and Economics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChina\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAirlangga University\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndonesia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSebelas Maret University\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndonesia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversity of Economics and Law\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVietnam\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMassey University\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNew Zealand\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e35\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCurtin University\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAustralia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e34\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversity of Salamanca\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpain\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e34\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMalaysia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e33\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRenmin University of China\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChina\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e32\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eZhongnan University of Economics and Law\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChina\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e32\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDongbei University of Finance and Economics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChina\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJiangsu University\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChina\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e29\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFerdowsi University of Mashhad\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIran\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.5 Thematical Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure \u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e's frequent word analysis indicates a significant study emphasis on the convergence of Corporate Social Responsibility, sustainable development, and corporate strategy, underscoring governance's pivotal role in influencing SDGs practices [55], [56]. Research highlights governance strategies and corporate social responsibility (CSR) as essential tools for improving stakeholder confidence and ensuring regulatory compliance [57]. The regional focus on China indicates an increasing scrutiny of governance improvements in emerging economies [58]. The amalgamation of industrial management, economic and social ramifications, and finance indicates a transition towards evaluating the economic implications of SDGs, hence strengthening institutional viewpoints [59]. Regression analysis demonstrates a significant dependence on empirical techniques to assess the connections between governance and SDGs, consistent with econometric research on business performance [60]. Moreover, stakeholder participation, investment strategies, and corporate decision-making are key elements in comprehending financial and strategic answers to SDGs concerns [61]. Increasing focus on climate change and environmental governance underscores business alignment with global SDGs frameworks like TCFD and the EU Taxonomy [62]. The findings indicate that although governance and SDGs research has advanced, forthcoming studies ought to investigate AI-driven ESG analytics, digital governance, and sustainable investment strategies as new frontiers in the discipline [63].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure \u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e's Word Tree Map analysis identifies Corporate Social Responsibility as the predominant theme 192, 10%, underscoring its essential function in organizational accountability and ethical conduct, consistent with previous studies on risk mitigation and stakeholder trust. Corporate strategy 133, 7% and sustainable development 149, 8% underscore the amalgamation of strategic planning with SDGs objectives, indicating the wider implementation of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The governance approach 114, 6% and corporate social responsibility 98, 5% highlight the variety in governance frameworks and the increasing demand for firms to consider social and environmental consequences. Emerging topics such as China 64, 3% and finance 44, 2% signify regional and sectoral effects, whereas stakeholder focus 40, 2% denotes a transition towards inclusive governance frameworks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure \u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e of the thematic mapping illustrates that specialist themes such as Corporate Social Responsibility, sustainable development, and industrial management are well-developed yet isolated, indicating their high density but limited centrality, in accordance with previous findings about the siloed character of these subjects. The lack of driving themes emphasizes the fragmented condition of the area, indicating a necessity for integrative research that connects governance and SDGs. Emerging or declining themes, such as corporate strategy and CSR, signify changing objectives, consistent with trends towards ESG frameworks and more sophisticated governance methodologies. Implicit themes presumably encompass fundamental notions such as stakeholder theory, which are essential for comprehending the evolution of the discipline.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe analysis delineates significant trends in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs as illustrated in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig10\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e, emphasizing ESG performance, CSR, and SDGs, which mirror the global transition towards ethical and sustainable business practices. Sub-themes including accounting, firm performance, gender diversity, earnings management, and board governance illustrate the intricacies of incorporating SDGs into corporate strategies, while the focus on disclosure and stakeholders emphasizes the significance of transparency in CSR initiatives. The term frequency data reveals a substantial rise in research production from 2018 to 2022, with forecasts extending to 2024, consistent with previous studies highlighting the increasing importance of these subjects in tackling global issues such as climate change and social injustice. This analysis underscores the necessity for additional investigation into ESG integration, the effects of technology on governance, and regulatory repercussions, establishing a solid basis for continued research in this dynamic domain.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.6 Co-occurrence and Bibliometric Coupling\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig11\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e the Co-occurrence of Keywords Network analysis through VOSviewer in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs research uncovers a dynamic intellectual landscape characterized by significant topic clusters, such as sustainable development, gender diversity, ownership structure, and corporate social responsibility. The centrality of Corporate Social Responsibility within the network underscores its significance, while the growing importance of SDGs assurance, carbon emissions, and ESG reporting signifies a transition towards stakeholder-oriented governance frameworks. The rise of gender diversity and board efficacy corresponds with previous research highlighting inclusive decision-making, however tax evasion and financialization illustrate ongoing discussions regarding governance transparency. Thematic trend indicates a shift from conventional governance frameworks to digital and SDGs-oriented models, corroborating the conclusions of [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [64] regarding stakeholder capitalism and [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [65] concerning ESG effect.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe analysis through VOSviewer of the Bibliometric Coupling Author Network in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig12\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e concerning Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs research identifies four principal thematic clusters: strategic governance and performance, regulatory compliance and ethical governance, SDGs reporting and CSR disclosure, and financial implications of stakeholder capitalism. The network visualization underscores prominent scholars, like [66], [67], [68], whose contributions have significantly influenced discourse on ESG integration, transparency, and corporate performance. The co-citation framework corresponds with agency theory, stakeholder theory, and legitimacy theory, substantiating prior research on the financial significance of SDGs governance (Eccles et al., 2014). The clustering further validates the bibliometric trends identified by de Villiers et al. (2014), highlighting the relationship between legislative frameworks and SDGs disclosures.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThrough VOSViewer Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig13\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e: Bibliometric Coupling Country Network examination of international collaborations in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs research underscores principal global research centers, nascent partnerships, and regional dynamics. The United States, China, and the United Kingdom are the foremost contributors to research, establishing robust co-authorship networks, consistent with prior studies [69], [70] that highlight their institutional and academic preeminence in SDGs governance. The red cluster (Western economies), green cluster (developing markets and Islamic economies), and blue cluster (Oceania and European outreach) represent separate regional research ecosystems, with the United Kingdom and Italy acting as vital knowledge conduits. Countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia, and South Africa exhibit heightened research involvement, indicating the globalization of SDGs governance dialogue. The network demonstrates a disproportionate presence of Western economies, highlighting the necessity for more South-South engagement to incorporate varied perspectives. Subsequent study ought to investigate developing themes such as ESG reporting, sustainable corporate policy, and digital governance [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [65] to facilitate a more inclusive and thorough comprehension of global corporate SDGs practices.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4.0 Discussions","content":"\u003cp\u003eA bibliometric examination of Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs research offers an in-depth comprehension of the field's development and its correspondence with global SDGs objectives. The findings underscore a significant focus on ESG integration, stakeholder involvement, and governance's role in tackling environmental and social issues. This discourse correlates the research outcomes with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe incorporation of ESG principles into Corporate Social Responsibility corresponds with SDG 8, which highlights sustainable economic growth, full employment, and dignified work. The study emphasis\u0026rsquo;s the significance of governance in fostering ethical corporate practices, transparency, and accountability, which are crucial for developing inclusive and resilient economies [71]. The emphasis on board diversity and gender equality in governance frameworks advances the SDG 8 objective of fostering equitable opportunities in the workplace [72]. Future study should investigate the adaptation of governance structures to address labor rights and equitable salaries, especially in emerging economies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe thematic progression of Corporate Social Responsibility research indicates an increasing focus on innovation and digital technology, in accordance with SDG 9. The incorporation of AI, blockchain, and more digital instruments into governance structures can improve transparency, risk management, and SDGs reporting [73]. These inventions can facilitate the advancement of sustainable infrastructure and industrial processes, especially in areas with constrained technological capacities. Future research should explore how digital governance might be utilized to tackle governance difficulties in developing economies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe bibliometric research highlights the significance of Corporate Social Responsibility in fostering sustainable production and consumption patterns, which are pivotal to SDG 12. The emphasis on SDGs reporting, circular economy initiatives, and environmental governance signifies a transition towards more accountable business models [74]. The increasing focus on cleaner production and sustainable supply chain management corresponds with the aims of SDG 12 concerning sustainable resource utilization and waste minimization. Future study should investigate methods to enhance governance systems that facilitate the implementation of circular economy ideas across various businesses.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe topic analysis indicates a pronounced emphasis on climate change and environmental governance, directly corresponding with SDG 13. The incorporation of climate-related risks into Corporate Social Responsibility structures, alongside the focus on carbon emissions and SDGs assurance, signifies the increasing acknowledgement of corporations' involvement in combating climate change [75]. Future study should investigate the adaptation of governance structures to bolster company resilience against climate-related hazards and facilitate the transition to low-carbon economies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe research findings underscore the essential function of Corporate Social Responsibility in fostering transparency, accountability, and ethical behavior, which are pivotal to SDG 16. The emphasis on regulatory compliance, anti-corruption initiatives, and stakeholder engagement corresponds with the objective of establishing robust, inclusive, and responsible institutions [76]. Future study should examine the adaptation of governance frameworks to combat corruption and enhance the rule of law, especially in emerging markets.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe bibliometric study indicates a significant focus on international collaboration and information dissemination in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs studies. The co-authorship networks and international research collaborations identified in the study correspond with SDG 17, which underscores the significance of global partnerships for attaining sustainable development [77]. Future study should investigate methods to enhance international relationships that facilitate the execution of ESG frameworks and SDGs programs, especially in areas with constrained resources and institutional capabilities.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"5.0 Limitations and Future Directions","content":"\u003cp\u003eFuture research in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs should concentrate on emerging domains, including the incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) and digital technologies in ESG analytics, the function of blockchain in improving transparency, and the influence of digital transformation on sustainable governance frameworks. Moreover, there is a necessity for additional empirical research on the convergence of Corporate Social Responsibility and circular economy practices, with the establishment of universal governance norms applicable across various regulatory frameworks. Research should investigate the financial ramifications of sustainable investment methods and the influence of stakeholder capitalism in promoting long-term SDGs. This study has significant drawbacks, notably its dependence on bibliometric data from Scopus, potentially excluding pertinent studies from alternative databases. The analysis is limited by its temporal scope, encompassing only publications up to 2025, which may overlook new trends. Moreover, the emphasis on English-language publications may neglect important contributions from non-English-speaking areas, so constraining the worldwide relevance of the findings. Rectifying these shortcomings in forthcoming research will yield a more thorough comprehension of the dynamic interplay between Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"6.0 Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis bibliometric analysis offers an extensive overview of the developing relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs, emphasizing notable research trends, topic advancements, and prospective directions. The research indicates an increasing focus on ESG integration, stakeholder engagement, and SDGs reporting, propelled by legislative changes and global SDGs issues. Although Western economies, notably the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, prevail in the research domain, rising economies such as China, Malaysia, and Indonesia are progressively enhancing the dialogue. The analysis highlights the significance of interdisciplinary collaboration, digital transformation, and inclusive governance frameworks in tackling complex SDGs challenges. Nonetheless, deficiencies persist in domains such as AI-driven governance, circular economy methodologies, and regional policy analyses. This research identifies pivotal authors, institutions, and topic clusters, providing essential insights for academics, policymakers, and practitioners, hence facilitating the development of more robust and inclusive Corporate Social Responsibility models that correspond with global SDGs objectives. Future study ought to concentrate on the integration of emerging technologies, the enhancement of global cooperation, and the exploration of the socio-economic effects of governance practices to promote sustainable development.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny, \u0026ldquo;A Survey of Corporate Governance,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJ Finance\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 737\u0026ndash;783, Jun. 1997, doi: 10.1111/J.1540-6261.1997.TB04820.X. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x. [Accessed: Feb. 15, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e John. Elkington, \u0026ldquo;Cannibals with forks : the triple bottom line of 21st century business,\u0026rdquo; p. 410, 2002, Available: https://www.wiley.com/en-in/Cannibals+with+Forks%3A+The+Triple+Bottom+Line+of+21st+Century+Business-p-9781841120843. [Accessed: Mar. 16, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e R. Karim, A. Waaje, Md. M. Roshid, and Md. B. Yeamin, \u0026ldquo;Turning the Waste Into Wealth: Progressing Toward Global Sustainability Through the Circular Economy in Waste Management,\u0026rdquo; in \u003cem\u003eSustainable Waste Management in the Tourism and Hospitality Sectors\u003c/em\u003e, R. Sucheran, Ed., IGI Global, 2025, pp. 507\u0026ndash;552. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-6110-8.ch019. Available: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/979-8-3693-6110-8.ch019\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e R. G. Eccles, I. Ioannou, and G. Serafeim, \u0026ldquo;The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eManage Sci\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2835\u0026ndash;2857, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e C. Zheng and R. Kouwenberg, \u0026ldquo;A Bibliometric Review of Global Research on Corporate Governance and Board Attributes,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eSustainability 2019, Vol. 11, Page 3428\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 3428, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.3390/SU11123428. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3428/htm. [Accessed: Mar. 16, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e A. Waaje, R. Karim, Md. M. Roshid, and T. N. Meem, \u0026ldquo;Minimizing Waste in the Hospitality Industry: The Opportunities and Challenges of Lean Tourism,\u0026rdquo; in \u003cem\u003eSustainable Waste Management in the Tourism and Hospitality Sectors\u003c/em\u003e, R. Sucheran, Ed., IGI Global, 2025, pp. 125\u0026ndash;166. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-6110-8.ch006. Available: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/979-8-3693-6110-8.ch006\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e M. K. Bosi, N. Lajuni, A. C. Wellfren, and T. S. Lim, \u0026ldquo;Sustainability Reporting through Environmental, Social, and Governance: A Bibliometric Review,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eSustainability 2022, Vol. 14, Page 12071\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 14, no. 19, p. 12071, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3390/SU141912071. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12071/htm. [Accessed: Mar. 16, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e M. M. Roshid, A. Waaje, T. N. Meem, and A. Sarkar, \u0026ldquo;Logistics 4.0: A Comprehensive Literature Review of Technological Integration, Challenges, and Future Prospects of Implementation of Industry 4.0 Technologies,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 20, no. 1. Common Ground Research Networks, pp. 65\u0026ndash;85, 2024. doi: 10.18848/1832-3669/CGP/v20i01/65-85\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e V. Naciti, F. Cesaroni, and L. Pulejo, \u0026ldquo;Corporate governance and sustainability: a review of the existing literature,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJournal of Management and Governance\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 55\u0026ndash;74, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1007/S10997-020-09554-6/METRICS. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10997-020-09554-6. [Accessed: Mar. 16, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e R. Karim, Md. M. Roshid, F. B. Shamme, and Md. M. Hasan, \u0026ldquo;Non-performing Loans and Bank Profitability: Evidence from Bangladesh,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Finance \u0026amp; Banking Studies (2147\u0026ndash;4486)\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 95\u0026ndash;102, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.2314. Available: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/view/2314\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e N. O. D. Ellili, \u0026ldquo;A bibliometric review of bibliometric reviews of corporate governance: current topics and recommendations for future research,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Disclosure and Governance\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 244\u0026ndash;262, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1057/S41310-024-00256-1/METRICS. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41310-024-00256-1. [Accessed: Mar. 16, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e E. Chytis, N. Eriotis, and M. Mitroulia, \u0026ldquo;ESG in Business Research: A Bibliometric Analysis,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJournal of Risk and Financial Management 2024, Vol. 17, Page 460\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 17, no. 10, p. 460, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/JRFM17100460. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/10/460/htm. [Accessed: Mar. 17, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e A. Waaje, R. Karim, Md. M. Roshid, B. Yeamin, and T. N. Meem, \u0026ldquo;Integration of Industry 4.0 With Personalized Medicine,\u0026rdquo; in \u003cem\u003eAI-Driven Personalized Healthcare Solutions\u003c/em\u003e, 2025, pp. 27\u0026ndash;70. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-7858-8.ch002. Available: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/979-8-3693-7858-8.ch002\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e C. Est\u0026eacute;vez-Mendoza and \u0026Aacute;. Montoro-S\u0026aacute;nchez, \u0026ldquo;Exploring the relationship between innovation and corporate governance,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eTechnol Forecast Soc Change\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 209, p. 123784, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2024.123784\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e Md. M. Roshid, A. Waaje, R. Karim, M. R. Irtisham, and M. S. Kaswan, \u0026ldquo;Industry 5.0 and Organizational Sustainability : Integrating Cutting-Edge Technologies and Human Ingenuity,\u0026rdquo; in \u003cem\u003eIndustry 5.0\u003c/em\u003e, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2025, pp. 50\u0026ndash;61. doi: 10.1201/9781003535188-7. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003535188-7/industry-5-0-organizational-sustainability-md-mustaqim-roshid-abdul-waaje-rejaul-karim-mohammad-rafid-irtisham-mahender-singh-kaswan. [Accessed: May 11, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e P. Ludwig and R. Sassen, \u0026ldquo;Which internal corporate governance mechanisms drive corporate sustainability?,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJ Environ Manage\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 301, p. 113780, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2021.113780\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e K. Jain and P. S. Tripathi, \u0026ldquo;Mapping the environmental, social and governance literature: a bibliometric and content analysis,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJournal of Strategy and Management\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 397\u0026ndash;428, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1108/JSMA-05-2022-0092/FULL/XML\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e C. Gherțescu, A. G. Manta, R. M. Băd\u0026icirc;rcea, and L. F. Manta, \u0026ldquo;How Does the Digitalization Strategy Affect Bank Efficiency in Industry 4.0? A Bibliometric Analysis,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eSystems 2024, Vol. 12, Page 492\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 492, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.3390/SYSTEMS12110492. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/12/11/492/htm. [Accessed: Mar. 17, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e F. Ekardt, \u0026ldquo;Sustainability,\u0026rdquo; 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-19277-8. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-19277-8. [Accessed: Mar. 17, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e U. B. Antu \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, \u0026ldquo;Perspective of nanocellulose production, processing, and application in sustainable agriculture and soil fertility enhancement: A potential review,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eInt J Biol Macromol\u003c/em\u003e, p. 140570, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.140570\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e G. Song \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, \u0026ldquo;The Neuromarketing: Bridging Neuroscience and Marketing for Enhanced Consumer Engagement,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eIEEE Access\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 13, pp. 40331\u0026ndash;40353, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3545742\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e A. Saban, N. Nazlia Jamil, and A. Roziana Mohd Ariffin, \u0026ldquo;Bibliometric Analysis of the Quality of Management Control System Using Delone and McLean Model,\u0026rdquo; 2024. Available: www.vosviewer.com\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e A. Waaje, M. M. Roshid, S. Islam, R. Chandra Bhowmik, M. A. Rahaman, and M. M. Hassan, \u0026ldquo;Tourism, trade, energy, and economic development: Drivers of ecological footprint in the World\u0026rsquo;s top tourist destinations,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eInnovation and Green Development\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 4, no. 3, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.igd.2025.100249\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e L. Scordato and M. Gulbrandsen, \u0026ldquo;Resilience perspectives in sustainability transitions research: A systematic literature review,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eEnviron Innov Soc Transit\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 52, p. 100887, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.EIST.2024.100887\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e R. Albahsh and M. F. Al-Anaswah, \u0026ldquo;Bibliometric analysis of corporate governance: Past, present, and future research agenda,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eCorporate Ownership and Control\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 146\u0026ndash;168, May 2023, doi: 10.22495/cocv20i3art10\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e A. S. Dhaigude, A. Verma, and G. Nayak, \u0026ldquo;Sustainable production and consumption: a bibliometric analysis of SDG-12 literature through a financial management lens,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eCogent Economics \u0026amp; Finance\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 13, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1080/23322039.2025.2467882. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23322039.2025.2467882\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e C. Forliano, E. Battisti, P. de Bernardi, and T. Kliestik, \u0026ldquo;Mapping the greenwashing research landscape: a theoretical and field analysis,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eReview of Managerial Science\u003c/em\u003e. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s11846-025-00856-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e J. K. Roy and L. Vasa, \u0026ldquo;Financial technology and environmental, social and governance in sustainable finance: a bibliometric and thematic content analysis,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eDiscover Sustainability\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 6, no. 1. Springer Nature, Dec. 01, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s43621-025-00934-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e R. Karim, M. M. Roshid, and A. Waaje, \u0026ldquo;Does the Firm Size Matter for Financial Performance? \u0026mdash; Evidence from the Financial Sector of a South Asian Emerging Economy,\u0026rdquo; in \u003cem\u003eEMIDWORLD 2nd International Congress on Economics Public Finance Business \u0026amp; Social Sciences\u003c/em\u003e, Istanbul, 2025, pp. 461\u0026ndash;474.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e A. Pritchard, \u0026ldquo;Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJournal of Documentation\u003c/em\u003e, pp. 348\u0026ndash;349, 1969, Available: https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1190144. [Accessed: Feb. 06, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e H. Keathley-Herring, E. Van Aken, F. Gonzalez-Aleu, F. Deschamps, G. Letens, and P. C. Orlandini, \u0026ldquo;Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eScientometrics\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 927\u0026ndash;951, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x. [Accessed: Oct. 18, 2024]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e S. M. Lawani, \u0026ldquo;Bibliometrics: Its Theoretical Foundations, Methods and Applications,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eLibri\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 294\u0026ndash;315, Jan. 1981, doi: 10.1515/LIBR.1981.31.1.294/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS. Available: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/libr.1981.31.1.294/html. [Accessed: Oct. 18, 2024]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e K. Salinas-R\u0026iacute;os and A. J. G. L\u0026oacute;pez, \u0026ldquo;Bibliometrics, a useful tool within the field of research,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJournal of Basic and Applied Psychology Research\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 9\u0026ndash;16, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.29057/JBAPR.V3I6.6829. Available: https://repository.uaeh.edu.mx/revistas/index.php/jbapr/article/view/6829. [Accessed: Oct. 18, 2024]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e Md. M. Roshid, R. Karim, A. Waaje, S. Islam, and R. C. Bhowmik, \u0026ldquo;Mapping the carbon finance research: A bibliometric exploration of innovation in sustainable finance,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eDevelopment and Sustainability in Economics and Finance\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 5, p. 100048, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.DSEF.2025.100048. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2950524025000083. [Accessed: Feb. 17, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e M. M. Roshid, R. Karim, and A. Waaje, \u0026ldquo;Synergizing Circular Economy and H2H Marketing: A Sustainable Approach to Human-Centric Business,\u0026rdquo; in \u003cem\u003eEMIDWORLD 2nd International Congress on Economics Public Finance Business \u0026amp; Social Sciences\u003c/em\u003e, Istanbul, 2025, pp. 767\u0026ndash;783. Available: www.emidworld.com\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, \u0026ldquo;How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJ Bus Res\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 133, pp. 285\u0026ndash;296, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.04.070\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e D. Mishra, Z. Luo, S. Jiang, T. Papadopoulos, and R. Dubey, \u0026ldquo;A bibliographic study on big data: concepts, trends and challenges,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eBusiness Process Management Journal\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 555\u0026ndash;573, 2017, doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-10-2015-0149/FULL/XML\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e D. Jurgens, S. Kumar, R. Hoover, D. McFarland, and D. Jurafsky, \u0026ldquo;Measuring the Evolution of a Scientific Field through Citation Frames,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eTrans Assoc Comput Linguist\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 6, pp. 391\u0026ndash;406, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1162/TACL_A_00028. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00028. [Accessed: Oct. 18, 2024]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e C. Vindrola-Padros and G. A. Johnson, \u0026ldquo;Rapid Techniques in Qualitative Research: A Critical Review of the Literature,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320921835\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1596\u0026ndash;1604, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1049732320921835. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049732320921835. [Accessed: Oct. 18, 2024]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e C. Weismayer and I. Pezenka, \u0026ldquo;Identifying emerging research fields: a longitudinal latent semantic keyword analysis,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eScientometrics\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 1757\u0026ndash;1785, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1007/S11192-017-2555-Z/METRICS. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-017-2555-z. [Accessed: Oct. 18, 2024]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e A. Kolk and P. Perego, \u0026ldquo;Sustainable Bonuses: Sign of Corporate Responsibility or Window Dressing?,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJournal of Business Ethics\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 1\u0026ndash;15, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1007/S10551-012-1614-X\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e R. E. Freeman and S. Dmytriyev, \u0026ldquo;Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory: Learning From Each Other,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eSymphonya. Emerging Issues in Management\u003c/em\u003e, no. 1, pp. 7\u0026ndash;15, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.4468/2017.1.02FREEMAN.DMYTRIYEV\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e R. Agrawal, N. Islam, A. Samadhiya, V. Shukla, A. Kumar, and A. Upadhyay, \u0026ldquo;Paving the way to environmental sustainability: A systematic review to integrate big data analytics into high-stake decision forecasting,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eTechnol Forecast Soc Change\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 214, p. 124060, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2025.124060\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e G. O. Ogundajo, R. I. Akintoye, O. Abiola, A. Ajibade, M. I. Olayinka, and A. Akintola, \u0026ldquo;Influence of country governance factors and national culture on corporate sustainability practice: an inter-Country study,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eCogent Business \u0026amp; Management\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 9, no. 1, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2130149. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23311975.2022.2130149. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e R. V. Aguilera, J. A. Arag\u0026oacute;n-Correa, V. Marano, and P. A. Tashman, \u0026ldquo;The Corporate Governance of Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Proposal for More Integrated Research,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJ Manage\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1468\u0026ndash;1497, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0149206321991212\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e D. M. Salvioni, F. Gennari, and L. Bosetti, \u0026ldquo;Sustainability and Convergence: The Future of Corporate Governance Systems?,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eSustainability 2016, Vol. 8, Page 1203\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 1203, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.3390/SU8111203. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/11/1203/htm. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e G. Ou, K. Zhao, R. Zuo, and J. Wu, \u0026ldquo;Effects of research funding on the academic impact and societal visibility of scientific research,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJ Informetr\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 101592, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.JOI.2024.101592\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e G. Dicuonzo, F. Donofrio, A. P. Iannuzzi, and V. Dell\u0026rsquo;Atti, \u0026ldquo;The integration of sustainability in corporate governance systems: an innovative framework applied to the European systematically important banks,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Disclosure and Governance\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 249\u0026ndash;263, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1057/S41310-021-00140-2/FIGURES/2. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41310-021-00140-2. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e I. Hristov and C. Searcy, \u0026ldquo;Integrating sustainability with corporate governance: a framework to implement the corporate sustainability reporting directive through a balanced scorecard,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eManagement Decision\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 443\u0026ndash;467, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1108/MD-10-2023-1995/FULL/XML\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e I. M. Garc\u0026iacute;a-S\u0026aacute;nchez, N. Hussain, C. Aibar-Guzm\u0026aacute;n, and B. Aibar-Guzm\u0026aacute;n, \u0026ldquo;Assurance of corporate social responsibility reports: Does it reduce decoupling practices?,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eBusiness Ethics, the Environment \u0026amp; Responsibility\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 118\u0026ndash;138, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1111/BEER.12394. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/beer.12394. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e M. Z. Kazemi, A. A. Elamer, G. Theodosopoulos, and S. F. A. Khatib, \u0026ldquo;Reinvigorating research on sustainability reporting in the construction industry: A systematic review and future research agenda,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJ Bus Res\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 167, p. 114145, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2023.114145\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e A. A. Gull, A. Abid, K. Hussainey, T. Ahsan, and A. Haque, \u0026ldquo;Corporate governance reforms and risk disclosure quality: evidence from an emerging economy,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJournal of Accounting in Emerging Economies\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 331\u0026ndash;354, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1108/JAEE-11-2021-0378/FULL/PDF\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e M. M. Roshid, A. Waaje, and R. Karim, \u0026ldquo;Industry 6.0 as an Emerging Field of Research: A Systematic and Bibliometric Analysis,\u0026rdquo; in \u003cem\u003eEMIDWORLD 2nd International Congress on Economics Public Finance Business \u0026amp; Social Sciences\u003c/em\u003e, Istanbul, 2025, pp. 784\u0026ndash;802.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e A. Anand, P. Argade, R. Barkemeyer, and F. Salignac, \u0026ldquo;Trends and patterns in sustainable entrepreneurship research: A bibliometric review and research agenda,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJ Bus Ventur\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 36, no. 3, p. 106092, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.JBUSVENT.2021.106092\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e N. Saini and M. Singhania, \u0026ldquo;Corporate governance, globalization and firm performance in emerging economies: Evidence from India,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 1310\u0026ndash;1333, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-04-2017-0091\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e S. K. Kakar \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, \u0026ldquo;Corporate Governance, Risk Management, and Bank Performance: Does Type of Ownership Matter?,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJournal of Financial Risk Management\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 10, no. 03, pp. 342\u0026ndash;366, 2021, doi: 10.4236/jfrm.2021.103020\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e R. Karim, Md. M. Roshid, B. K. Dhar, Md. Nahiduzzaman, and B. C. Kuri, \u0026ldquo;Audit Committee Characteristics and Sustainable Firms\u0026rsquo; Performance: Evidence From the Financial Sector in Bangladesh,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eBusiness Strategy \u0026amp; Development\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 7, no. 4, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1002/bsd2.70059. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bsd2.70059\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e F. Wu, \u0026ldquo;China\u0026rsquo;s Emergent City-Region Governance: A New Form of State Spatial Selectivity through State-orchestrated Rescaling,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eInt J Urban Reg Res\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1134\u0026ndash;1151, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12437. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-2427.12437. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e D. C. North, \u0026ldquo;Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eInstitutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance\u003c/em\u003e, Oct. 1990, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511808678. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/institutions-institutional-change-and-economic-performance/AAE1E27DF8996E24C5DD07EB79BBA7EE. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e P. M. Clarkson, Y. Li, G. D. Richardson, and F. P. Vasvari, \u0026ldquo;Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eAccounting, Organizations and Society\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 33, no. 4\u0026ndash;5, pp. 303\u0026ndash;327, May 2008, doi: 10.1016/J.AOS.2007.05.003\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e S. L. Gillan, A. Koch, and L. T. Starks, \u0026ldquo;Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJournal of Corporate Finance\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 66, p. 101889, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.JCORPFIN.2021.101889\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e A. Z. Amir and G. Serafeim, \u0026ldquo;Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eFinancial Analysts Journal\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 87\u0026ndash;103, 2018, doi: 10.2469/FAJ.V74.N3.2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e T. Lim, \u0026ldquo;Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and artificial intelligence in finance: State-of-the-art and research takeaways,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eArtificial Intelligence Review 2024 57:4\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1\u0026ndash;64, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/S10462-024-10708-3. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-024-10708-3. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e R. E. Freeman, \u0026ldquo;THE STAKEHOLDER APPROACH,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eStrategic Management\u003c/em\u003e, pp. 1\u0026ndash;2, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139192675.003\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e H. M. Chen, T. C. Kuo, and J. L. Chen, \u0026ldquo;Impacts on the ESG and financial performances of companies in the manufacturing industry based on the climate change related risks,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJ Clean Prod\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 380, p. 134951, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.134951\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e S. E-Vahdati, N. Zulkifli, and Z. Zakaria, \u0026ldquo;Corporate governance integration with sustainability: a systematic literature review,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eCorporate Governance (Bingley)\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 255\u0026ndash;269, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1108/CG-03-2018-0111/FULL/XML\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e N. O. D. Ellili, \u0026ldquo;Bibliometric analysis on corporate governance topics published in the journal of Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eCorporate Governance (Bingley)\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 262\u0026ndash;286, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1108/CG-03-2022-0135/FULL/XML\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e S. Y. Enciso-Alfaro and I. M. Garc\u0026iacute;a-S\u0026aacute;nchez, \u0026ldquo;Corporate governance and environmental sustainability: Addressing the dual theme from a bibliometric approach,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eCorp Soc Responsib Environ Manag\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1025\u0026ndash;1041, May 2023, doi: 10.1002/CSR.2403. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/csr.2403. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e Z. Zhu, Y. Jin, Y. Su, K. Jia, C. L. Lin, and X. Liu, \u0026ldquo;Bibliometric-Based Evaluation of the Neuromarketing Research Trend: 2010\u0026ndash;2021,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eFront Psychol\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 13, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872468\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e E. V. Raudales-Garcia, J. V. Acosta-Tzin, and P. A. Aguilar-Hern\u0026aacute;ndez, \u0026ldquo;Econom\u0026iacute;a circular: una revisi\u0026oacute;n bibliom\u0026eacute;trica y sistem\u0026aacute;tica,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eRegi\u0026oacute;n Cient\u0026iacute;fica\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 2024192\u0026ndash;2024192, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.58763/RC2024192. Available: https://rc.cienciasas.org/index.php/rc/article/view/192/281. [Accessed: Aug. 08, 2024]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e D. Mallick and A. Rahman, \u0026ldquo;Inclusive Economic Growth and Climate-Resilient Development in Bangladesh,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eBangladesh\u0026rsquo;s Economic and Social Progress: From a Basket Case to a Development Model\u003c/em\u003e, pp. 89\u0026ndash;114, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-1683-2_3. Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-1683-2_3. [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e B. I. Chigbu and F. Nekhwevha, \u0026ldquo;Exploring the concepts of decent work through the lens of SDG 8: addressing challenges and inadequacies,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in Sociology\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 8, p. 1266141, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.3389/FSOC.2023.1266141/BIBTEX\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e M. A. Razzaque, S. H. Bidisha, and B. H. Khondker, \u0026ldquo;Exchange Rate and Economic Growth,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eJournal of South Asian Development\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 42\u0026ndash;64, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0973174117702712. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0973174117702712. [Accessed: Mar. 01, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e R. Karim, M. Roshid, and A. Waaje, \u0026ldquo;Circular Economy and Supply Chain Sustainability,\u0026rdquo; in \u003cem\u003eStrategic Innovations for Dynamic Supply Chains\u003c/em\u003e, 2024, pp. 1\u0026ndash;30. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-3575-8.ch001. Available: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/979-8-3693-3575-8.ch001\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e T. Tanchangya, M. R. Mia, M. M. Roshid, J. Chakma, F. Islam, and M. H. Rahman, \u0026ldquo;Role of green financing and energy production to mitigate climate change in emerging economy like Bangladesh,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Sustainable Energy and Environmental Research\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 114\u0026ndash;139, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.18488/13.v13i2.3935. Available: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/13/article/view/3935\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e R. Karim, Md. M. Hasan, A. Waaje, Mst. S. H. Yesmin, and Md. M. Roshid, \u0026ldquo;Financial Performance of Bangladeshi Listed Commercial Banks: A Generation-based Analysis,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Finance \u0026amp; Banking Studies (2147\u0026ndash;4486)\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 46\u0026ndash;56, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.20525/ijfbs.v12i4.3170. Available: https://ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/view/3170\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e S. A. Cruz, \u0026ldquo;SDG 17 and global partnership for sustainable development: unraveling the rhetoric of collaboration,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eFront Environ Sci\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 11, 2023, doi: 10.3389/FENVS.2023.1155828/PDF. Available: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1155828. [Accessed: Jan. 07, 2025]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Bharathidasan University","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs, Bibliometric Analysis, SDGs","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6747329/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6747329/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis study does a bibliometric analysis of research trends in Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs, investigating the thematic evolution, intellectual framework, and prospective orientations of this interdisciplinary domain. Analysis of Scopus data (1994\u0026ndash;2025) indicates a substantial rise in academic output, propelled by the increasing incorporation of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) frameworks in business decision-making. Prominent themes encompass SDGs reporting, stakeholder engagement, board diversity, and the use of digital technology in governance. The results underscore the congruence of Corporate Social Responsibility studies with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), namely SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and SDG 13 (Climate Action). The study highlights deficiencies in the literature, including the necessity for further investigation into digital governance, AI-driven SDGs analytics, and the circular economy. Theoretical implications encompass the progression of stakeholder theory and agency theory about SDGs, whilst practical consequences emphasize the formulation of governance frameworks that improve transparency, accountability, and resilience. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research, highlighting the significance of inclusive governance models, international collaborations, and the incorporation of emerging technology to tackle intricate SDGs issues.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Corporate Social Responsibility and SDGs: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends, Thematic Evolution, and Future Directions","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-05-28 10:56:46","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6747329/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"a261dcc2-0e5f-4fd1-8df1-814885015b2b","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 28th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":49031637,"name":"International Business"},{"id":49031638,"name":"Management"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-05-28T10:56:46+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-05-28 10:56:46","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6747329","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6747329","identity":"rs-6747329","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}