Impact of nonagricultural employment on the income gap between rural and urban areas in China | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Impact of nonagricultural employment on the income gap between rural and urban areas in China Peng Wang This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6524595/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Narrowing the urban–rural income gap and promoting the nonfarm employment of rural laborers are critical to the common prosperity. As such, they have become issues of great concern and urgency. This paper analyzed the theoretical mechanism through which the nonfarm employment of the rural labor force affects the urban–rural income gap and empirically examined it using provincial panel data from 1993 to 2022. The results revealed that the nonfarm employment rate of China's rural labor force contributes to the convergence of the urban–rural income gap, and the impact of the nonfarm employment rate of the rural labor force on the urban–rural income gap exhibited a “U-shaped” trend of decreasing first and then increasing. At the national level, the current nonfarm employment rate of rural labor in China did not cross the inflection point. nonagricultural employment income gap rural and urban Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6524595","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":467215328,"identity":"198e7614-dbd8-4da7-bc83-9c6ab4e40851","order_by":0,"name":"Peng Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Gansu University of Political Science and Law","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Peng","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-04-25 02:53:05","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6524595/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6524595/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":99310973,"identity":"b69f3b6a-e2f4-47ec-bfa0-1410f6adcf5b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-31 16:13:38","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":675292,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6524595/v1_covered_15e5e2ea-3272-48ad-8dcb-d384dbf162a8.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Impact of nonagricultural employment on the income gap between rural and urban areas in China","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"nonagricultural employment, income gap, rural and urban","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6524595/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6524595/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Narrowing the urban–rural income gap and promoting the nonfarm employment of rural laborers are critical to the common prosperity. As such, they have become issues of great concern and urgency. This paper analyzed the theoretical mechanism through which the nonfarm employment of the rural labor force affects the urban–rural income gap and empirically examined it using provincial panel data from 1993 to 2022. The results revealed that the nonfarm employment rate of China's rural labor force contributes to the convergence of the urban–rural income gap, and the impact of the nonfarm employment rate of the rural labor force on the urban–rural income gap exhibited a “U-shaped” trend of decreasing first and then increasing. At the national level, the current nonfarm employment rate of rural labor in China did not cross the inflection point.","manuscriptTitle":"Impact of nonagricultural employment on the income gap between rural and urban areas in China","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-12-24 14:44:32","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6524595/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"0f19191b-a783-4ec4-aa1b-1dcb303d44f2","owner":[],"postedDate":"December 24th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-12-24T14:44:33+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-12-24 14:44:32","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6524595","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6524595","identity":"rs-6524595","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.