Model Tests and 3D Simulations of Deep Cement Mixing Wall Reinforced with Prestressed Steel Tubular Truss

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

The paper studied a proposed deep cement mixing wall system in which a cement–soil composite beam is reinforced with a prestressed steel tubular truss, evaluating mechanical behavior using model tests and 3D finite element simulations. Deformation, stiffness, and crack distribution were compared across cement–soil composite beams with different reinforcement conditions, and the study quantified stiffness/load contributions from the steel truss versus the cement–soil. Results reported that ultimate deflection was reduced by ~25% versus an ordinary steel tubular truss and by ~29% versus the prestressed steel tubular truss alone, with load sharing of about 70% carried by the steel truss and 30% by the cement–soil; prestressing delayed crack development and improved flexural performance relative to an I-beam. The authors note the work is based on model tests and numerical simulations in a composite-beam context (and the article is a preprint, not peer reviewed). The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Steel trusses have desirable bending performance; accordingly, a new type of stiffen deep cement mixing (SDCM) wall,namely deep cement mixing wall (DCM) reinforced with a prestressed steel tubular truss, is proposed in this paper. Its performance is studied via model tests and 3D finite element simulations of cement–soil composite beams. The deformation, stiffness, and crack distribution characteristics of different cement–soil composite beams are compared and analysed, and the stiffness contribution of the steel truss and cement–soil to the composite beams is elucidated. According to the test results, the ultimate deflection of the cement–soil composite beam reinforced with prestressed steel tubular truss is reduced by approximately 25% compared with a cement–soil composite beam reinforced with an ordinary steel tubular truss, and it is reduced by approximately 29% compared with the prestressed steel tubular truss. The results show that the steel truss bears approximately 70% of the load, whereas the cement–soil bears the remaining 30% of the load. Prestressing can effectively delay the development of cracks in cement–soil composite beams, thus greatly improving the overall stiffness and support capacity of composite beams. Analysing the loading process of composite beams via the finite element model revealed that the bearing characteristics of steel trusses are largely uniform: in the cement–soil composite beam or steel truss alone. Accordingly, along with the results of the numerical simulation analysis, it is proved that the steel truss is critical to improving the flexural capacity of composite beams, and the load sharing ratio of the prestressed steel truss is higher than that of an ordinary steel truss. The prestressed steel truss reinforced composite beams have better flexural performance than an I-beam.
Full text 12,846 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Model Tests and 3D Simulations of Deep Cement Mixing Wall Reinforced with Prestressed Steel Tubular Truss | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Model Tests and 3D Simulations of Deep Cement Mixing Wall Reinforced with Prestressed Steel Tubular Truss Yong Chen, Wei Wang, Gang Shi, Dongpo Cai, Shaoqiang Chai, Guojian Zhang, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4665071/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Steel trusses have desirable bending performance; accordingly, a new type of stiffen deep cement mixing (SDCM) wall,namely deep cement mixing wall (DCM) reinforced with a prestressed steel tubular truss, is proposed in this paper. Its performance is studied via model tests and 3D finite element simulations of cement–soil composite beams. The deformation, stiffness, and crack distribution characteristics of different cement–soil composite beams are compared and analysed, and the stiffness contribution of the steel truss and cement–soil to the composite beams is elucidated. According to the test results, the ultimate deflection of the cement–soil composite beam reinforced with prestressed steel tubular truss is reduced by approximately 25% compared with a cement–soil composite beam reinforced with an ordinary steel tubular truss, and it is reduced by approximately 29% compared with the prestressed steel tubular truss. The results show that the steel truss bears approximately 70% of the load, whereas the cement–soil bears the remaining 30% of the load. Prestressing can effectively delay the development of cracks in cement–soil composite beams, thus greatly improving the overall stiffness and support capacity of composite beams. Analysing the loading process of composite beams via the finite element model revealed that the bearing characteristics of steel trusses are largely uniform: in the cement–soil composite beam or steel truss alone. Accordingly, along with the results of the numerical simulation analysis, it is proved that the steel truss is critical to improving the flexural capacity of composite beams, and the load sharing ratio of the prestressed steel truss is higher than that of an ordinary steel truss. The prestressed steel truss reinforced composite beams have better flexural performance than an I-beam. Foundation pit support Prestressed steel tubular truss Combination beam Crack Stiffness contribution Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4665071","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":329573883,"identity":"5b44bc1d-2ccc-4eaf-9683-962c551b31fe","order_by":0,"name":"Yong Chen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yong","middleName":"","lastName":"Chen","suffix":""},{"id":329573884,"identity":"8702dbf3-3820-4a48-bf79-2f6712a7c988","order_by":1,"name":"Wei Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Wei","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":329573885,"identity":"eb11ac41-c4cc-4801-b73a-e87e581825c5","order_by":2,"name":"Gang Shi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhengzhou University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Gang","middleName":"","lastName":"Shi","suffix":""},{"id":329573886,"identity":"d8e95440-6187-4ac4-9729-5051065bf10d","order_by":3,"name":"Dongpo Cai","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dongpo","middleName":"","lastName":"Cai","suffix":""},{"id":329573887,"identity":"0f8d5b83-36f2-475a-b448-53c7d4375dcf","order_by":4,"name":"Shaoqiang Chai","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shaoqiang","middleName":"","lastName":"Chai","suffix":""},{"id":329573888,"identity":"e2732fcd-583c-42d2-ac87-9807c377c089","order_by":5,"name":"Guojian Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Guojian","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""},{"id":329573889,"identity":"ef34a696-42c0-4463-9d43-fc1ead0ff0b1","order_by":6,"name":"Kun Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kun","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""},{"id":329573890,"identity":"90110f26-8307-4b36-84e0-c55c704393ab","order_by":7,"name":"Peng Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Peng","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""},{"id":329573891,"identity":"791ddfe5-18ea-400d-a8fd-580b8dde8c08","order_by":8,"name":"Jincan Chen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhengzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jincan","middleName":"","lastName":"Chen","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-07-01 03:44:07","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4665071/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4665071/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":80971884,"identity":"32dcae44-c471-4793-9f77-7082132aa059","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-20 11:46:28","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1134220,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"paper.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4665071/v1_covered_310c90dd-55f8-4f16-ade2-87aea12cbed6.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eModel Tests and 3D Simulations of Deep Cement Mixing Wall Reinforced with Prestressed Steel Tubular Truss\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Foundation pit support, Prestressed steel tubular truss, Combination beam, Crack Stiffness contribution","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4665071/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4665071/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eSteel trusses have desirable bending performance; accordingly, a new type of stiffen deep cement mixing (SDCM) wall,namely deep cement mixing wall (DCM) reinforced with a prestressed steel tubular truss, is proposed in this paper. Its performance is studied via model tests and 3D finite element simulations of cement–soil composite beams. The deformation, stiffness, and crack distribution characteristics of different cement–soil composite beams are compared and analysed, and the stiffness contribution of the steel truss and cement–soil to the composite beams is elucidated. According to the test results, the ultimate deflection of the cement–soil composite beam reinforced with prestressed steel tubular truss is reduced by approximately 25% compared with a cement–soil composite beam reinforced with an ordinary steel tubular truss, and it is reduced by approximately 29% compared with the prestressed steel tubular truss. The results show that the steel truss bears approximately 70% of the load, whereas the cement–soil bears the remaining 30% of the load. Prestressing can effectively delay the development of cracks in cement–soil composite beams, thus greatly improving the overall stiffness and support capacity of composite beams. Analysing the loading process of composite beams via the finite element model revealed that the bearing characteristics of steel trusses are largely uniform: in the cement–soil composite beam or steel truss alone. Accordingly, along with the results of the numerical simulation analysis, it is proved that the steel truss is critical to improving the flexural capacity of composite beams, and the load sharing ratio of the prestressed steel truss is higher than that of an ordinary steel truss. The prestressed steel truss reinforced composite beams have better flexural performance than an I-beam.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Model Tests and 3D Simulations of Deep Cement Mixing Wall Reinforced with Prestressed Steel Tubular Truss","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-07-23 11:23:04","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4665071/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"8a9a7d0b-3353-4368-9d58-d605f2993775","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 23rd, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-04-20T11:38:20+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-07-23 11:23:04","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4665071","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4665071","identity":"rs-4665071","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0