Dihaploid plant production of red beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris), homozygosity evaluation using isoenzymatic and NGS methods

Dihaploid plant production of red beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris), homozygosity evaluation using isoenzymatic and NGS methods | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Dihaploid plant production of red beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris), homozygosity evaluation using isoenzymatic and NGS methods Waldemar Kiszczak, Maria Burian, Tadeusz Malinowski, Małgorzata Podwyszyńska, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4841972/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Conditions of in vitro gynogenesis process in red beet was examined. A significant influence of the genotype on the gynogenesis process was demonstrated. Of the eight genotypes, 58.3% planted ovules regenerated embryo-like structures in breeding line 411, 2.1% in RA-10, RA-11, RA-12 breeding lines and 0.9% embryo-like structures in ‘Opolski’. For the gynogenesis induction, B5 medium containing 0.1 mgl -1 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid was the most effective from all tested media. On this medium, the highest number of gynogenetic embryo-like structures was obtained. Most of the plants were regenerated on MS medium supplemented with 30 g l -1 sucrose, 0.2 mg l -1 6-benzylaminopurine and 1 mg l -1 indole-3-acetic acid. Thirty nine percent of the regenerated plants acclimatized. Cytometric evaluation of the gynogenetic plants of four tested genotypes revealed that in three genotypes, 100% of tested plants were haploid. Plants showed diploid ploidy level in one genotype. Isoenzymatic analysis of gynogenetic plants demonstrated that 95% and 70% of examined populations were homozygotic for the phosphohexose isomerase isoenzyme and the aspartato aminotransferase isoenzyme, respectively. During the next generation sequencing, 93% of reads were successfully mapped, from which 83–85% were mapped in pairs. For 15% of pairs it was clear that the obtained sequence was fully homozygous, the rest of the readings were not unambiguous, but similar to the sequence of a homozygous base pair system. gynogenesis cytometry isoenzymes next generation sequencing Figures Figure 1 1. Introduction Red beet is a common crop plant distributed throughout Asia Minor, the Mediterranean, and Europe. It is also known as an economically important plant. Due to the high content of biologically active substances, in particular betanin, red beet is classified as a nutreocytic food. Currently, breeding of the new cultivar of crop plants is conducted with the use of the traditional and biotechnological methods. Gynogenesis is one of the utilized methods, which allows researchers to obtain haploid plants and double haploid lines (DH) in a short period of time. Haploid plants became a valuable source for basic research such as genome mapping, genetic analyses, mutations, transformation, somatic hybridization, biochemical and physiological analyses, cytogenetic research, reference genome sequencing and genetic linkage analysis (Ferrie and Möllers 2011 ). Most often, however, they are used in plant breeding programmes. So far intensive research on production of haploid plants using gynogenesis were conducted mainly on sugar beet. First haploid plants of red beet were obtained by Hosemans and Bossoutrot in 1983 with the efficiency of 23 haploid plants produced from 10000 ovules (Hosemans and Bossoutrot 1983 ). Subsequently, the successful induction of plant regeneration from unpollinated ovules was reported by Bossoutrot and Hosemans ( 1985 ). Since then many researchers obtained embryos by gynogenesis in sugar beet, e.g. Gürel et al. 2000 ; Nagl et al. 2004 ; Tomaszewska-Sowa 2010 ; Aflaki et al. 2017 ; Pazuki et al. 2017 . For red beet, Barański ( 1996 ) obtained few haploid plants using gynogenesis. In 2021, two research teams confirmed the obtaining of haploid red beet plants by in vitro gynogenesis (Zayachkovskaya et al. 2021; Kiszczak et al. 2021) and in 2023 by Kiszczak et al. The process of induced gynogenesis is determined by numerous endogenous and exogenous factors such as the genotype and the composition of induction and regeneration media. Genotypes vary greatly in their ability to form a gynogenetic embryo or plant regeneration (Gürel et al., 2000 ; Klimek-Chodacka and Barański 2013; Pazuki 2017). Barański ( 1996 ) observed that ovules collected from donor plants with stable cultivar genotypes had a greater gynogenic ability than the ovules of hybrids or inbred lines. Other studies have confirmed genotypic differences in the efficiency of androgenesis, but have not indicated that these differences are significant between stable varieties and inbred lines (Zayachkovskaya et al. 2021; Kiszczak et al. 2021). In general, media based on N6 (Chu et al. 1975 ) and MS (Murashige and Skoog 1962 ) containing various growth regulator combinations were used to induce gynogenesis (Weich and Levall 2003 ; Aflaki et al. 2017 ; Pazuki et al. 2017 ). Doctrinal et. al ( 1989 ) showed the positive effect of indole-1-acetic acid (IAA), 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) or kinetin (KIN) applied in N6 medium on the gynogenesis process in sugar beet. Gośka et al. ( 2004 ) obtained gynogenetic embryos on the MS medium supplemented with BAP and naphthalene-3-cetic acid (NAA). The addition of activated charcoal and AgNO 3 to MS medium has also been shown to increase gynogenesis capacity in sugar beet (Gürel et al. 2000 ). Also Pazuki et al. ( 2017 ) successfully applied MS medium with the addition of BAP. Barański ( 1996 ) used N6 medium with the addition of IAA and BAP to induce gynogenesis in red beet. However, after obtaining gynogenetic embryos Barański ( 1996 ) did not achieve the direct conversion of sugar beet embryos into plants. Different authors obtained better results in androgenesis using IMB medium supplemented with TDZ (Zayachkovskaya et al. 2021) and B5 medium with the addition of IAA, BA and putrescine (Kiszczak et al. 2021; Kiszczak et al. 2023). Zayachkovskaya et al. (2021) obtained direct regeneration of callus in plants on MS medium containing BAP and GA 3 , but the root system was weak, therefore passages of shoots were performed several times to medium without hormones. Kiszczak et al. (2021 and 2023) obtained plants with well-developed root system on MS medium supplemented with BA and IAA, however more shoots regenerated on medium with the addition of BA and Put. In the next stage, obtained shoots were rooted on ½ MS medium containing NAA and Put. Successful regeneration and adaptation are the most important stages in the whole procedure of deriving gynogenetic plants, but only ploidy level and homozygosity evaluation can confirm the obtaining of haploids or DH plants. The ploidy level of gynogenetic plants, can be confirmed by determination of the nuclear DNA content using flow cytometry (Bohanec 2013 ; Oliveira et al. 2013 ; Keles et al. 2016 ). The above-mentioned authors have successfully used flow cytometry for ploidy evaluation of red beet (Zayachkovskaya et al. 2021; Kiszczak et al. 2021; Kiszczak 2023). Plants obtained in the process of gynogenesis should also have their homozygosity confirmed. Evaluation of isoenzyme polymorphism is commonly used to confirm the homozygosity of various plant species obtained in the gynogenesis process (Murovec and Bohanec 2012 ). In case of red beet, authors have applied two isoenzymatic systems (Kiszczak et al. 2021; Kiszczak et al. 2023). According to Djedatin et al. ( 2017 ), next generation sequencing (NGS) is less expensive, more effective and quicker method of detection to determine the homozygotic arrangement of alleles in the genome. NGS is known to be the most precise method that provides an immense amount of bioinformatic data. With advances of the NGS technology and DNA sequencing, it was possible to use accurate genotyping as a tool for the genetic and evolutionary studies or in the process of accelerating the breeding processes (Song et al. 2016 ; Wang et al. 2016 ). Polymorphism of the genome, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), is determined in the NGS method (Kumar 2012; Gupta et al. 2017 ). The spontaneous doubling of the genetic material often occurs in the gynogenesis process, which in case of the allelic forms of genes in tested isoenzymes, can cause difficulties for determination of the gametic origin of those plants. According to Djedatin et al. ( 2017 ), the most effective method for detection of the duplication of entire segments of the genome or even single genes is the NGS method. The above-mentioned method is very suitable for the isolation of homozygotic populations found in a transgenesis procedure (Passricha et al. 2016 ). O'Malley et al. ( 2017 ) used results obtained from NGS for the isolation of homozygotic mutants from the population of Arabidopsis thaliana . Earlier in 2016, NGS sequencing, in concert with Bulk Segregant Analysis, allowed researchers to accelerate the identification of causal mutations with a reference genome sequence in the sugar beet (Ries et al., 2016 ). Szklarczyk et al. (2016) applied NGS as a supplementary method for the identification of mitochondrial DNA characteristics, which diversified the cytoplasmatic male sterile and male fertile forms of sugar beet. On the other hand, so far there is no information in the literature about the application of this method in the studies on the genome of red beet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of various factors on the gynogenesis process and to obtain regenerated, haploid plants of red beet. Different important factors for the gynogenesis process were under study, i.e. the induction medium, the genotype, media for gynogenesis induction and plant regeneration, acclimatization process. Ploidy of obtained plants was also evaluated and the usability of isoenzyme polymorphism analysis for the determination of homozygosity was tested. The correlation between the isoenzyme polymorphism and the analysis of the base pairs order in the genome of red beet on the basis of NGS were examined. The NSG analysis was also performed in order to obtain data that will be used in the databases. Thanks to the information included in the database, researchers will be able to design molecular markers and perform comparative transcriptomics. Knowing the nucleotide sequence of the genome or the transcriptome, it will be also possible to find single nucleotide mutations (SNPs) or simple nucleotide sequence repeats (SSRs). 2. Materials and methods 2.1 Preparation of plant material Roots of various red beet genotypes were used, including the ‘Opolski’ cultivar, as a standard, and ten breeding lines delivered by cooperating Breeding and Seed Company - POLAN Sp. z o.o. in Cracow. Received plants with heterozygosity confirmed by breeding methods were planted in a substrate consisting of 1:3 (v/v) sand and soil and placed in a cold chamber at 4°C for two-month vernalization. Then, roots were planted in plastic containers with a capacity of 20 l (two roots per container) in a growth chamber under controlled growth conditions at 18°C during the day and 16°C at night, with a 16 hour photoperiod. 2.2 General research plan In the first stage of the study, the protocol for gynogenetic plant production was optimized for each red beet genotype. In the second stage, gynogenetic plants of ‘Opolski’ and various breeding lines RA-5, RA-10, RA-11, RA-12, RA-13, RA-14, 406, 411, 4/11, 5/11 were produced using the optimized protocol. Initial research and then research on determining the composition of the medium that guarantees the formation of embryos were conducted on the 'Opolski' variety. In the following year, apart from other genotypes, mainly optimization of the PGR composition was carried out on the 411 breeding line. At the stage of multiplication, the ploidy of obtained multiplication was analysed using flow cytometer. Shoots of breeding line no. 411 with cytometrically confirmed haploid number of chromosomes were placed on a solidified MS medium containing 5 g L⁻¹ colchicine for 5 min (Pazuki eta al. 2018) and then transferred onto MS media supplemented with 0.2 mg L⁻¹ BAP and 1 mg L⁻¹ IAA, on which roots have developed from shoots. Plants with confirmed homozygosity were given to breeders, who included received plant material in their breeding programs. 2.3 Optimization of the protocol for gynogenetic plant production 2.3.1 Gynogenesis induction Green, immature flower buds with unfolded petals of the ‘Opolski’ cultivar and breeding lines (in first season RA-10, RA-11, RA-12, RA-13, RA-14, 406, 411 and RA-5, 4/11, 5/11, 411 in the next season) were disinfected with 70% ethanol for 10 min and washed 2 times in sterile distilled water. Ovules were isolated from disinfected flower buds under a stereoscopic microscope. Using preparation needles, 24 ovules were placed in one Erlenmeyer flasks (100 ml) containing 30 ml of medium (media described below). All induction media were supplemented with 100 g l -1 sucrose and solidified with 6.5 g l -1 agar. The pH of all media was adjusted to 5.8 (Barański 1996 ). The ovule cultures were kept at 27°C and continuous light (24 hours a day) with photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 30 µmol m -2 s -1 . Formation of embryo-like structures (ELS) took place after 6–14 weeks. The efficiency of the gynogenesis process was defined by the number of obtained embryos per 100 planted ovules (%). In the first experiment, frequency of ELS formation was compared among all tested genotypes. Ovules were plated on the B5 (Gamborg et al. 1968 ) induction medium supplemented with 0.5 mg l − 1 BAP and 0.2 mg l − 1 IAA. This medium proved to be the most effective for inducing red beet gynogenesis in the preliminary studies conducted by the authors in the previous year. In the second experiment, the effect of medium composition on gynogenesis frequency was studied. Ovules of red beet ‘Opolski’ were cultured on N6 media (Chu et al. 1975 ) or modified B5 (with the addition of 500 mg l − 1 L-glutamine and 100 mg l − 1 L-serine) supplemented with 0.1 mg l − 1 2,4-D (Górecka et al. 2017 ) in the first variant or 0.2 mg l − 1 BAP and 0.5 mg l − 1 IAA in the second variant (Barański 1996 ; Górecka et al. 2017 ). 2.3.2 Plant regeneration Studies on optimalization of plant regeneration were conducted on the ELSs of ‘Opolski’ cultivar and breeding line No. 411 obtained from ovule cultures. The effect of medium composition and sucrose concentration was examined. The ELS were transferred to the media selected in the preliminary studies as an optimal media for this stage, consisting of the N6 medium containing 0.2 BAP mg l -1 , B5 medium without hormones and MS medium supplemented with 1 mg l -1 TDZ with the addition of sucrose at concentrations of 10, 20, or 30 g l -1 . All tested media were solidified with 6.5 g l − 1 agar, pH adjusted to 5.6 (Ghosh et al., 2013). ELS were cultured in a 30 ml tube containing 10 ml of medium, placed in a growth room and exposed to continuous light with PPFD of 30 µmol m − 2 s − 1 (16 hours a day) at a temperature of 20°C. Observations were made after six weeks of culture. One embryo was placed in each of the 10 tubes containing the tested media. In the next experiment, ELSs were transferred onto the MS regeneration medium containing 1 mg l -1 BAP with the addition of 30 g l -1 sucrose. Six weeks later, regenerating plants were placed on MS medium with BAP at a lower concentration of 0.2 mg l -1 , supplemented with various auxins, IAA or NAA each at the concentration of 1 mg l -1 . Observation of frequency and quality of regenerated plants was conducted after four weeks. At this stage, ploidy analysis was performed using a flow cytometer. 2.3.3 Acclimatization Plants underwent the acclimatization process in order to conduct further studies on methods of chromosome doubling. Eighteen fully developed plants of red beet breeding line No. 411 were rinsed in distilled water after removing from the tubes, dipped for a second in 2% Kaptan solution, planted in multipots containing peat and sand medium (1:3, v/v), in high humidity conditions in a plastic tunnel, in a growth chamber at a temperature of 20°C during the day and 18 ° C at night and the light intensity of 30 µmol m − 2 s − 1 for 16 hours. After 3–4 weeks, the plastic tunnel was gradually ventilated to reduce the humidity. In the fifth week, an observation of adapted plants was made. In the final stage, adapted plants were transplanted to pots and cultured in the same growth chamber. 2.3.4 Ploidy evaluation Ploidy of gynogenetic plants was indirectly evaluated by establishing the nuclear DNA content using a PAII flow cytometer (Partec GmbH, Münster, Germany). Young leaves collected at the stage of multiplication from the breeding line No. 411 and other genotypes after plant acclimatization were used as plant material for ploidy analysis. Tha basic Partec buffer with the addition of PVP 40 was used. Isolated cell nuclei were stained with DAPI at a concentration of 0.1 mg l − 1 . Five hundred up to one thousand nuclei were analyzed in each sample. 2.3.5 Homozygosity evaluation Homozygosity was evaluated using isoenzymes and NGS for the selected putative obtained from. 399, 426 and 521 of breeding line No. 411, which was produced using the optimized protocol developed in the first research stage. 2.3.5.1 Isoenzyme system To assess homozygosity of plants obtained in ovule cultures (genotype No. 411), two isoenzymes were analyzed: phosphohexose isomerase (EC:5.3.1.9, PGI) and aspartato aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.1, AAT) (Westphal and Wricke 1989 ; Kiszczak et al. 2011 ). Electrophoresis was conducted on a 10% starch gel according to the Gottlieb method (1973). Separation of enzymes was performed according to the Selander et al. ( 1971 ) protocol. Weeden and Gottlieb’s method (1980) was used for visualization of polymorphism of tested isoenzymes. 2.3.5.2 NGS Three plants No. 399, 426 and 521 of breeding line No. 411, maintained in in vitro conditions have been used for this analysis. Total RNA was used for the preparation of cDNA libraries (and further transcriptome analysis) was obtained from red beetroot plants grown in vitro . About 400 mg of leaves and stems were used for RNA isolation from each one of the three plant lines. Plant/fungi total RNA Purification kit (Norgen Biotek #25800) was used according to the procedure recommended by a manufacturer with a minor modification – added two extra washes of the column before elution of purified RNA. Eluted RNA was precipitated overnight at -20°C after addition of 1/10 volume of 3 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2, and 2.5 volumes of cold (-20°C) 99% ethanol. Purified RNA was pelleted by centrifugation (30 minutes at 14,000 rpm; 4°C), washed twice with cold (-20°C) 80% ethanol, dried at room temperature, resuspended in water and DNAsed using Turbo DNAse (Life Technologies kit #AM 1907) according to a standard procedure. DNAsed RNA was precipitated, washed and resuspended finally in autoclaved MilliQ water (18.2 MΩ). Verification of the quality and concentration of the preparation was based on UV absorbance measurements in the range 140–220 nm (NanoDrop) and electrophoretic profile in a non-denaturing 2% agarose gel. Purified RNA was aliquoted and stored at -70°C. 2.3.6 Sequencing of cDNA and construction of cDNA libraries Preparations of total RNA have been sent to a commercial company Genomed S.A., (Warsaw, Poland). RiboZero cDNA libraries have been constructed there and sequenced on Illumina HiSeq platform. The total number of 100 nts paired reads obtained for the three plants analyzed: 399, 426 and 521, was 17,755,074, 57,828,394 and 41,841,448, respectively. Raw data (demultiplexed but neither trimmed, nor filtered for the quality) have been sent back to our laboratory, where further bioinformatic analysis was performed. 2.3.7 Bioinformatic analysis. Bioinformatic analysis was performed using CLC Bio Genomics Workbench software and services like BLAST provided by NCBI. The raw reads have been trimmed and filtered for quality, then mapped to a reference transcriptome of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris ) published by Dohm et al. ( 2014 ). The reference consisted of 29,088 contigs of average length 1,526 nts. The percentage of reads mapped successfully was 93.10, 93.59, and 93.48% of their total number for three samples. From 83.03–84.98% reads were mapped in pairs, with the observed distance in pairs from 83–334 nts, which increased their effective length. Library reads were mapped (separately for every sample) based on the sequence of 29,088 transcripts read for sugar beet (Dohm et al. 2014 ). 2.3.8 Statistical analyses A flask containing 48 ovules was counted as a repetition in conducted experiments. The number of repetitions varied in a particular experiment and was dependent on the availability of plant material. Obtained data were analyzed using ANOVA/MANOVA multivariate models and non-parametric analyses such as the Kruskal and Wallis ( 1952 ), at an adopted level of significance of α = 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistica 8.0 software package for Windows (StatSoft Inc. Tulsa, USA). 3 Results 3.1 Gynogensis induction The highest percentage of gynogenetic ELS/100 ovules (58.3) was obtained in red beet breeding line No. 411 and the lowest in ‘Opolski’ (0.9 ELS/100) (Table 1). No embryos were obtained in three breeding lines (RA-13, RA-14 and 406). The most effective medium for the gynogenesis induction in red beet was B5 medium supplemented with 0.1 mg l -1 2,4-D (Table 2). On this medium, 2.5 out of 100 planted ovules formed ELSs. Whereas, on N6 medium, in the presence of 2,4-D, 1.6 embryos per 100 ovules were produced. No embryos were formed on N6 medium containing BAP and IAA. 3.2 Plant regeneration Regenerated shoots of various quality and/or callus formation were obtained after transferring gynogenetic embryos with a different frequency depending on regeneration media (MS, N6 and B5) and sucrose concentration (10, 20 and 30 g l -1 ) (Table 3). The highest number of shoots was obtained on MS medium containing 30 g l -1 sucrose, that is 2,88 average per 1 embryo, also the highest number of callus (2,89 per 1 embryo) was observed on MS medium. No shoots developed from gynogenetic embryos on B5 medium; however, a small amount of callus formation was observed. On the most effective regeneration medium (MS supplemented with 30 g l -1 sucrose) the effect of growth regulators (BAP in combination with IAA or NAA) was examined on shoot development of red beet breeding line No. 411. Obtained results indicate that whole plants with a well-developed root system can be obtained on media supplemented with both types of auxin combined with BAP (Table 4). However, the higher number of well developed plants was obtained on medium containing 0.2 mg l -1 BA and 1 mg l -1 IAA. All regenerated plants (18) of this cultivar were planted ex vitro and 39% survived the acclimatization process. 3.3 Ploidy evaluation All tested plants of ‘Opolski’ red beet, 411, 5/11 breeding lines consisted of DNA equivalent to a haploid number of chromosomes (Table 5). Plants RA-5 breeding line consisted of DNA equivalent to a diploid number of chromosomes. 3.4 Homozygosity – isozyme analysis Homozygosity analysis of gynogenetic plants from breeding line No. 411 showed that in case of PGI isoenzyme, 95% of examined plants were homozygotes and 5% were heterozygotes. Regarding the AAT isoenzyme, 70% of these plants were homozygous, 23% heterozygous and for the remaining 7%, due to the illegible polymorphism of bands, we were not able to confirm their homozygosity. 3.5 Homozygosity – NGS Ninety three percent of reads were successfully mapped for each from the three tested genotypes, from which 83% to 85% was mapped in pairs. For the set of 29,088 reference transcripts with a total length of 44,686,800 nucleotides, the following fragments were mapped respectively: 16,530,673 fragments (total length of mapped fragments: 1,645,771,149 nts) for sample No. 399, 56,121,204 fragments (5,398,960,791 nts) for sample No. 426, 39,111,596 fragments (3,901,891,001 nts) for sample No. 521. The number of sugar beet transcripts, to which reads obtained for the samples of red beet were mapped (with the applied mapping parameters: 60%, 80%), is presented in Table 6. A list of observed variants was made for every tested plant (in a simplified form: the differences in sequence in comparison with the reference transcripts). 3.6 Bioinformatic analysis During analysis, the possibility of the occurrence of sequencing errors was taken into consideration, therefore an advanced software with sophisticated algorithms was used for the elimination or reduction of those errors. The possibility of the presence of several copies of the same genes was also considered. In the course of analysis, 172,710 potenial variants diversifying transcriptome of sugar beet and tested breeding lines of red beet were identified, which in conclusion gave 86,355 potential spots of difference. For more than 95% of those spots, the heterozygosity of tested plants was not specified (399, 426 and 521). The remainder of the sequence was fully homozygotic. Approximately 20,000.identical single nucleotides were tested in the reference transcriptome. During the analysis, all chromosomes (nine) were identified by at least 400 transcriptomes (genes or their fragments). For each chromosome of tested breeding line of red beet at least 4,000 variants (SNV, MSV or ins/del) were analyzed for the homozygosity (Table 7). 4. Disscusion Genotype is the most important factor, which determines the plant capacity to enter the gynogenesis process (Datta, 2005 ). Gynogenesis is very difficult to induce in many species. Difference in the capacity to enter the gametic embryogenesis by female gametic cells between different species, cultivars, breeding lines and even between particular individuals were described by several authors, e.g., Górecka et al. ( 2005 ) and Segui-Simmaro and Nuez (2008). Significant differences in gynogenetic capacity between genotypes also occurred in red beet that was reported by several authors (Barański 1996 ; Gürel et al. 2000 ; Tomaszewska-Sowa 2010 , Zayachkovskaya et al. 2021; Kiszczak et al. 2021; Kiszczak 2023) Barański ( 1996 ) observed gynogenesis in all tested red beet cultivars, but the frequency of embryo formation was dependent on genotype and ranged from 0-2.86%. In the 2021, Zayachkovskaya et al. obtained a higher induction factor dependent on the genotype, up to 25% of induced ovules. The highest gynogenesis efficiency of 33% was obtained by Kiszczak et al. (2023). In their studies, the number of obtained gynogenetic embryos was dependent on the genotype. In presented studies, we also confirmed that the efficiency of gynogenesis depends on the genotype. In the breeding line, we found the presence of embryos in over 58.3% of ovules, but e.g. in the RA-13 line, no gynogenetic sources were observed. Medium composition is one of the most important factors in the induction of haploids either in the process of androgenesis or gynogenesis. Barański ( 1996 ) discovered that the highest number of regenerants was observed on N6 medium (by Chu), during the application of a combination of 0.5 mg/L IAA and 0.2 mg/L 6-BAP. While the addition of silver nitrate (22 mg/L) to the IMB medium with the addition of 0.4 mg/L TDZ increased the number of induced ovules in all genotypes (Zayachkovskaya et al. 2021). In the studies conducted by Kiszczak et al. (2023), comparing B5 and N6 media, which both contained 0.5 mg L − 1 IAA, 0.2 mg L − 1 BA and supplemented with 322 mg L − 1 Put or 290 mg L − 1 Spd, the significantly higher numbers of embryos were obtained on B5 medium. Results of presented study showed that the most effective medium proved to be the B5 medium containing 0.1 mg l − 1 2,4-D. Considerably fewer or even no embryos were obtained on N6 media. Barański ( 1996 ) noted that the use of N6 medium supplemented with 0.5 mg l − 1 IAA and 0.2 mg l − 1 BA was the most effective in red beet embryo formation from ovules. We did not receive any gynogenetic embryos on this medium, while the highest number of embryos was received on B5 medium with the addition of 2,4-D. The above-mentioned auxin has the best ability to induce cell divisions and callus differentiation (Zheng et al. 1999) and its usability for inducing gynogenesis process in plants was confirmed by various authors (Rekha et al. 2013; Alan et al. 2016 ). However, in case of sugar beet, on N6 medium supplemented with this auxin, Doctrinal et al. ( 1989 ) did not observe any increase of gynogenesis frequency. In the studies presented by Kiszczak et al. 2023, this auxin paired with B5 medium did not cause a significant increase in the number of gynogenetic embryos, similarly to the N6 medium. Although authors obtained gynogenetic embryos in two experimental variants of 2.4-D medium, however the number of obtained gynogenetic embryos differed significantly from the other medium variants, which also contained polyamines: putrescine and spermidine. In our study, in the presence of 2,4-D, considerably fewer embryos were obtained on the N6 medium compared to the B5 medium. Plant regeneration is the next very important stage in the process of obtaining DH plants via gametic embryogenesis (Górecka et al. 2009 ; Kiszczak et al. 2015 ). Medium is one of the main factors affecting the efficiency of plant regeneration in this process (Segui-Simarro and Nuez 2008 ; Wędzony et al. 2009 ). In sugar beet, Gürel et al. (1998) applied medium on the base of MS containing 2.0 mg l -1 BAP for the regeneration of shoots from unfertilized ovaries and the medium with 2.0 mg l -1 NAA and 2.0 mg l -1 AgNO 3 for the rooting. Weich and Levall ( 2003 ) conducted the regeneration process in three stages using media on the base of MS with the addition of kinetin and NAA for shoot formation and with the addition of IBA for the root induction (pre-rooting). In 2017, Pazuki carried out the regeneration process in one stage using MS medium, but with the addition of BAP, that resulted in 18.98% of plants. Direct germination and formation of microrosettes occurred when the embryoid was placed on regenerating MS medium with the addition of 1 mg/L BAP and 0.1 mg/L GA 3 (Zayachkovskaya et al. 2021). However, in these experiments, the shoots did not develop or developed roots poorly, therefore additional passages on the hormone-free MS medium were performed. Other researchers obtained direct regeneration into plants on MS medium supplemented with 0.2 mg L -1 BA and 1 mg L -1 IAA, but this method was inefficient (Kiszczak et al. 2023). Therefore, regeneration from callus was conducted in two stages. Authors regenerated shoots on MS medium supplemented with BA and 0.5 mg L -1 putrescine and rhizogenesis was conducted on MS medium containing ½ MS macronutrients and supplemented with NAA at the concentrations of 1 or 3 mg L -1 and Put at 0.5 or 160 mg L -1 . In our studies, higher numbers of fully developed plants (reaching 10%) were obtained on MS medium, compared to N6 and B5 media. This confirms that MS-based media are the most suitable for regeneration of plants from gynogenetic embryos in red beet. The authors applied the standard of 30 g l -1 of sucrose. The increased presence of callus in our studies was due to the application of 0.2 mg l -1 BAP and 1 mg l -1 NAA for the regeneration of red beet embryos. Similar results were demonstrated earlier by Gurel et al. (2000). Authors applied the same combination of two growth regulators in the concentration of 1 mg l -1 BAP and 0.5 mg l -1 NAA. They observed a higher amount of formed callus comparing to other media used for the regeneration in in vitro cultures of sugar beet. In presented studies, only haploids underwent the acclimatization process, which in general are characterized by lower vigor (Murovec and Bohanec 2012 ). In case of sugar beet, Gośka et al. ( 2004 ) selected only diploid gynogenetic plants for the acclimatization, which allowed approximately 95% of plants to adapt to ex vitro conditions. In 2012, Tomaszewska-Sowa acclimatized almost 80% of gynogenetic plants of sugar beet. Some authors are emphasizing the special significance of the root system for the efficiency of acclimatizations (Salvi et al. 2002 ). Our observations of the acclimatization process of carrot androgenetic plants (Kiszczak et al. 2018 ) and current studies on the gynogenetic red beet regenerants confirm this thesis. It is most likely that one of the reasons a low percentage of plants in our experiments adapted was the very poor root system of haploid plants. Our research has shown that the tendency to spontaneously double the chromosome number was strongly dependent on the genotype. All the gynogenetic plants of ‘Opolski’ red beet and two breeding lines RA 5, 5/11 were haploids, whereas in one breeding line 4/11 and 411 all gynogenetic plants were diploids. The emergence of breeding line with a doubled set of chromosomes is probably related to the occurrence of the phenomenon of endoreduplication (Joubes and Chevalier 2000). Strong DNA endoreduplication was also observed during flow cytometry analysis in our study. Lukaszewska et al. ( 2011 ) observed this phenomenon in in vitro cultures of sugar beet. Authors showed that the application of medium with NAA at a concentration of 1 mg l − 1 , the same concentration as used in our experiments, intensified the process of endoreduplication. These observations indicate that doubling the chromosome number may be associated with tendency for a given genotype to endoreduplication. During the homozygosity analysis with the use of two isoenzymatic systems, PGI and AAT, the polymorphism that allowed recognition of homozygote from heterozygote was obtained for the PGI isoenzymatic system. Sabir et al. ( 1992 ) showed the usability of this isoenzymatic system for the analysis of the somaclonal variation frequency in plant material of sugar beet and chard, propagated in vitro . Authors also observed polymorphism in the PGI system, whereas the AAT system did not generate any variations in the bands. Ludina and Levites ( 2003 ) assigned the absence of the polymorphism for the malate dehydrogenase isoenzyme in the studies on the population of sugar beet to the not-allelic character of isoenzymes located in various cellular organelles. This finding indicates that genes of an isoenzyme, such as AAT, can be inherited with deviation from standard Mendel’s law. The appearance of a heterozygotic pattern of bands for both isoenzymes in tested population, may be due to the reasons explained above, also described by Levites et al. ( 2005 ). In conducted studies, authors demonstrated that spontaneous polyploidization caused by their prolonged culturing occurs in the haploid tissues of sugar beet under in vitro conditions. According to their results, the emergence of heterozygotes in polymorphic populations regarding the isocitrate dehydrogenase and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in combination with the simultaneous homozygotic profile for the other isoenzyme in the same plants indicate the occurrence of spontaneous polyploidization. Evaluation of the homozygosity of three red beet plants (399, 426 and 521 breeding lines) was performed on the basis of the transcriptome analysis (read with the use of the high-throughput sequencing and NGS) in terms of the occurrence of different variants of nucleotide sequences (SNV, MNV, ins/del). Results presented in Table 1 indicate that even in consideration of only reference transcripts, for which at least 100 mapped reads were obtained (approximately 100 nts each), conducted analysis included from 45–62% of potential red beet genes. High percentage (93%) of mapped reads, when adding the reads mapped in pairs with the distance in line with the expectations, indicates the high reliability of obtained results. Lower percentage of mapped reads was obtained by various researchers in other plant species, for example Wang et al. ( 2016 ) achieved 70% of mapped reads in corn. Obtained results are considered to be significant only when 95% of genes are mapped in comparison with cDNA databases (Claros et al. 2012 ). Analysis was performed on the transcripts originated from all red beet chromosomes, which allowed for the detection of potential aberrations during the chromosome duplication. The occurance of well documented (over 200 single reads) cases of simultaneous presence of two variants (heterozygosity) was discovered on every tested chromosome. However, the overwhelming part of the genome had a homozygotic character (Table 2 ). The appearance of false segmental duplications in the assemblies, which occurs when heterozygous sequences from two haplotypes are assembled into separate contigs and are scaffolded adjacent to each other rather than being merged, this is the main problem during the analysis of the material derived from a heterozygotic plant (Kelley and Salzberg 2010 ). This can also be referred to as the process of spontaneous doubling of chromosomes that occur while obtaining plants through gynogenesis. Therefore, part of the 200 single reads may be incorrectly categorized, which in reality leads to the appearance of a greater number of homozygotic variants. It should be emphasized that the applied method was considerably more sensitive to the detection of differentiation variants (heterozygosity) in the tested genomes in comparison to the classic methods. Declarations Author Contributions Waldemar Kiszczak, Maria Burian, Tadeusz Malinowski, Małgorzata Podwyszyńska, Krystyna Górecka contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Waldemar Kiszczak, Krystyna Górecka and Maria Burian. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Waldemar Kiszczak, Krystyna Górecka and Małgorzata Podwyszyńska and they authors and Marcin Domaciuk read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgments Research funded by Polish Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, task No 65 entitled: “Receiving homozygous red beet plants with the use of gametic embryogenesis”. References Aflaki F, Pazuki A, Gurel S, Stevanato P, Biancardi E, Gurel E (2017) Doubled haploid sugar beet: an integrated view of factors influencing the processes of gynogenesis and chromosome doubling. Int Sugar J 119:884–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1331-3_21 Alan AR, Celebi TF, Kaska A (2016) Production and evaluation of gynogenic leek ( Allium ampeloprasum L.) plants. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 125:249–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-016-0944-2 Andersen SB, Christiansen I, Farestveit B (1990) Carrot ( Daucus carota L.). In Vitro production of haploids and field trials. In: Bajaj YPS (ed). Biotechnol Agric For 12:393–402 Asif M (2013) Progress and Opportunities of Doubled Haploid Production. Springer Briefs Plant Sci 6:1–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00732-8_6 Barański R (1996) In vitro gynogenesis efficiency in red beet ( Beta vulgaris L) Effect of ovule culture conditions. Acta Soc Bot Pol 65:57–60 Bohanec B, Jakse M, Ihanb A, Javornik B (1995) Studies of gynogenesis in onion ( Allium cepa L.): Induction procedures and genetic analysis of regenerants. Plant Sci 104:215–224 Bohanec B (2013) Ploidy determination using flow cytometry. In: Maluszynski M (ed) Doubled Haploid Production in Crop Plants IV pp 397–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1293-4_52 Bossoutrot D, Hosemans D (1985) Gynogenesis in Beta vulgaris L: From in vitro culture to the production of doubled haploids plants in soil. Plant Cell Rep 4:300–303 Claros MG, Bautista R, Guerrero-Fernández D, Benzerki H, Seoane P, Fernández-Pozo N (2012) Why assembling plant genome sequences is so challenging. Biology 1:439–459. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology1020439 Oliveira CEG, Chamma DLM, Oliveira BF, Von PRG, Nayara ST (2013) Identification of haploid maize by flow cytometry, morphological and molecular markers. Ciência Agrotec 37(1):25–11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542013000100003 Chu CC, Wang CC, Sun CS, Hsu KC, Yin KC, Chu CY, Bi FY (1975) Establishment of anefficient medium for anther culture of rice through comparative experiments on the nitrogen sources. Sci Sinica 18:659–668 Datta SK (2005) Androgenic haploids: Factors controlling development and its application in crop improvement. Curr Sci 89(11):1870–1878 Djedatin G, Monat C, Engelen S, Sabot F (2017) Duplication Detector. a light weight tool for duplication detection using NGS data Curr Plant Biol 9(10):23–28 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2017.07.001 Doctrinal M, Sangwan RS, Sangwan-Norreel BS (1989) In vitro gynogenesis in Beta vulgaris L. Effects of plant growth regulators, temperature, genotypes and season. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 17:1–12 Dohm JC, Minoche AE, Holtgrawe D, Capella-Gutierrez S, Zakrzewski F, Tafer H, Rupp O, Sorensen T, Stracke R, Reinhardt R, Goesmann A, Kraft T, Schulz B, Stadler PF, Schmidt T, Gabaldon T, Lehrach H, Weisshaar B, Himmelbauer H (2014) The genome of the recently domesticated crop plant sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris ). 505(7484):546–549. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12817 Ferrie AMR, Möllers (2011) Haploids and doubled haploids in Brassica spp. for genetic and genomic research. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 104(3):375–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9831-4 Galatowitsch MW, Smith GA (1990) Regeneration from unfertilized ovule callus of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L). Can J Plant Sci 70:83–89 Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50:148–151 Gośka M (1985) Sugar beet haploids obtained in the in vitro culture. Bull Pol Acad Sci Biol Sci 33:31–33 Gośka M, Krysińska T, Strycharczuk K (2004) The use of in vitro gynogenesis for obtaining sugar beet dihaploids. IHAR Bull. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1331-3_20 . 234:27 – 14 Gottlieb LD (1973) Enzyme differentiation and phylogeny in Clarkia franciscana , C. rubicunda and C. amoena . Evol 27:205–214 Górecka K, Krzyżanowska D, Kiszczak W, Górecki R (2005) Embryo induction in anther culture of Daucus carota L. Veg Crop Res Bull 63:25–12 Górecka K, Dorota K, Urszula K (2007) Regeneration and evaluation of androgenetic plants of head cabbage ( Brassica Oleracea var. capitata L). Veg Crop Res Bull 67:5–15. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10032 Górecka K, Krzyżanowska D, Kiszczak W, Kowalska U (2009) Plant regeneration from carrot ( Daucus carota L.) anther culture derived embryos. Acta Physiol Plant 31(6):1139–1145 Górecka K, Krzyżanowska D, Kiszczak W, Kowalska U, Podwyszynska M (2017) Development of embryoids by microspore and anther cultures of red beet ( Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris). JCEA 18(1):185–195. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/18.1.1877185J Gupta P, Reddaiah B, Salava H, Upadhyaya P, Tyagi K, Sarma S, Datta S, Malhotra B, Thomas S, Sunkum A, Devulapalli S, Till BJ, Sreelakshmi Y, Sharma R (2017) Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based identification of induced mutations in a doubly mutagenized tomato (Solanum lycopersicum ) population. Plant J 92:495–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13654 Gürel E, Gürel S (1998) Plant Regeneration from Unfertilized Ovaries of Sugar Beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) Cultured In Vitr Tr. J Bot 22:233–238 Gürel S, Gürel E, Kaya Z (2000) Doubled haploid production from unpollinated ovules of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L). Plant Cell Reprod 19:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990000248 Hansen AL, Plever C, Pedersen HC, Keimer B, Andersen SB (1994) Efficient in vitro chromosome doubling during Beta vulgaris ovule culture. Plant Breed 112:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1994.tb00655.x Hosemans D, Bossoutrot D (1983) Induction of haploid plants from in vitro culture of unpollinated beet ovules ( Beta vulgaris L). Z Pflanzenziichtg 91:74–77 Keles D, Ozcan C, Pinar H, Ata A, Denli N, Yucel NK, Taskin H, Buyukalaca S (2016) First report of obtaining haploid plants using tissue culture techniques in spinach. HortScience 51(6):742–749. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.51.6.742 Kelley DR, Salzberg SL (2010) Detection and correction of false segmental duplications caused by genome mis-assembly. Genom Biol 11:R28. https://doi.org/10.1186%2Fgb-2010-11-3-r28 Kirikovich SS, Svirshchevskaya AM, Levites EV (2003) Variation at isozyme locet al. seed offspring of sugar beet gynogenetic lines Sugar Tech 5(4):289–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02942487 Klimek-Chodacka M, Baranski R (2013) Comparison of haploid and doubled haploid sugar beet clones in their ability to micropropagate and regenerate. Electron J Biotechn 16(2) http://dx.doi.org/10.2225/vol16-issue2-fulltext-3 Kiszczak W, Krzyżanowska D, Strycharczuk K, Kowalska U, Wolko B, Górecka K (2011) Determination of ploidy and homozygosity of carrot plants obtained from anther cultures. Acta Physiol Plant 33(2):401–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-010-0559-x Kiszczak W, Kowalska U, Kapuścińska A, Burian M, Górecka K (2015) Effect of low temperature on in vitro androgenesis of carrot ( Daucus carota L). Vitro Cell Dev Biol — Plant 51(2):135–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-015-9665-1 Kiszczak W, Kowalska U, Burian M, Górecka K (2018) Induced androgenesis as a biotechnology method for obtaining DH plants in Daucus carota L. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 93(6):625–633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2018.1431058 Kumar S, Banks TW, Cloutier S (2012) SNP Discovery through Next-Generation Sequencing and its applications. Int J Plant Genomics 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/831460 Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47(260):583–621 Levites EV, Svirshchevskaya AM, Kirikovichi SS, Mil'ko LV (2005) Variation at isozyme locet al. cultured in vitro sugar beet regenerants of gynogenetic origin. Sug Tech 7(1):71–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942487 Linsmaier EM, Skoog F (1965) Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 18:100–128 Ludina RS, Levites EV (2003) Subcellular localization of isozymes of NAD-dependent malate dehydrogenase in sugar beet Beta vulgaris L. Genetik 44(12):1638–1643 Lukaszewska E, Virden R, Sliwinska E (2011) Hormonal control of endoreduplication in sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) seedlings growing in vitro . Plant Biol 14:216–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00477.x O'Malley RC, Barragan CC, Ecker JR (2017) A User’s guide to the arabidopsis T-DNA insertional mutant collections. Methods Mol Biol 1284:323–342. https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-1-4939-2444-8_16 Maraschin SF, de Priester W, Spaink HP, Wang M (2005) Androgenic switch: an example of plant embryogenesis from the male gametophyte perspective. J Exp Bot 56:1711–1726. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri190 Metwally EI, Moustafa SA, El-Sawy BI, Haroun SA, Shalaby TA (1998) Production of haploid plants from in vitro culture of unpollinated ovules of Cucurbita pepo. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 52(3):117–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005948809825 Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioasseys with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497 Murovec J, Bohanec B (2012) Haploids and doubled haploids in plant breeding biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology. In: Ibrokhim Y (ed) Plant Breed 5:1–21. http://doi.org/10.5772/29982 Nagl N, Mezei S, Kovačev L, Vasić D, Čačić N (2004) Induction and micropropagation potential of sugar beet haploids. Genetik 36(3):187–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/GENSR0403187N Nielsen R, Paul JS, Albrechtsen A, Song YS (2011) Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. Nat Rev Genet 12(6):443–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2986 Nitsch JP, Nitsch C (1969) Haploid plants from pollen grains. Sci 163:85–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.163.3862.85 Passricha N, Saifi S, Khatodia S, Tuteja N (2016) Assessing zygosity in progeny of transgenic plants: current methods and perspectives. J Biol Methods 3/3:1–13. https://doi.org/e4610.14440/jbm.2016.114 Pazuki A, Aflaki F, Gürel E, Ergül A (2017) Gynogenesis induction in sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris ) Improved by 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP) and synergized with cold pretreatment. Sugar Tech, pp 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12355-017-0522-x Ries D, Holtgräwe D, Viehöver P, Weisshaar B (2016) Rapid gene identification in sugar beet using deep sequencing of DNA from phenotypic pools selected from breeding panels. BMC Genomics, 17:236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2566-9 Rekha HR, Rakhi C (2013) Establishment of dedifferentiated callus of haploid origin from unfertilized ovaries of tea ( Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) as a potential source of total phenolics and antioxidant activity. Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 49:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-013-9490-1 Rogozińska JH, Gośka M (1982) Attempts to induce haploids in anther cultures of sugar, fodder and wild-species of beet. Acta Soc Bot Pol 51(1):91–105. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.1982.009 Sabir A, Newbury HJ, Todd G, Catty J, Ford-Lloyd BV (1992) Determination of genetic stability using isozymes and RFLPs in beet plants regenerated in vitro. Theor Appl Genet 84:113–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00223989 Segui-Simarro JM, Nuez F (2008) How microspores transform into haploid embryos: changes associated with embryogenesis induction and microspore derived embryogenesis. Physiol Plant 134:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01113.x Salvi ND, George LY, Eapen S (2002) Micropropagation and field evaluation of micropropagated plants of tumeric. PCTOC 68:143–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013889119887 Selander RK, Smith MH, Yang SY, Johnson WE, Gentry JB (1971) Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. Variation in the old-field mouse ( Peromyscus polionotus ). UT Pub Genet 7103:49–90 Song HJ, Lee JM, Graf L, Rho M, Qiu H, Bhattacharya D, Yoon HS (2016) A novice’s guide to analyzing NGS-derived organelle and metagenome data. Algae 31(2):137–154. https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2016.31.6.5 Svirshchevskaya A, Dolezel J (2001) Karyological characterization of sugar beet gynogenetic lines cultured in vitro. J Appl Genet 42/1:21–32 Szklarczyk M (2016) The search for mitochondrial polymorphisms differentiating cytoplasmic male-sterile and male-fertile beets. Scien J Agr Univ Hugo Kołłątaj Krakow 408:1–108 Szkutnik T (2010) Apomixis In The Sugar Beet Reproduction System. Acta Biol Cracov Ser Bot 52(2):87–96. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10182-010-0011-y Tomaszewska-Sowa M (2010) Cytometric analyses of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris l.) Plants regenerated from unfertilized ovules cultured in vitro . EJPAU 13/4 Tyukavin GB, Shmykova NA, Mankhova MA (1999) Cytological study of embryogenesis in cultured carrot anthers. Russ J Plant Physl 46(6):876–884 Wang B, Tseng E, Regulski M, Clark TA, Hon T, Jiao Y, Lu Z, Olson A, Stein JC, Ware D (2016) Unveiling the complexity of the maize transcriptome by single-molecule long-read sequencing. Nat Commun 7(11708):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11708 Weeden FN, Gottlieb LD (1980) Isolation of cytoplasmic enzymes from pollen. Plant Physiol 66:400–403 Weich EW, Levall MW (2003) Doubled haploid production of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L). In: Maluszynski M, Kasha KJ, Forster BP, Szarejko I (eds) Doubled haploid production in crop plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1293-4_38 Westphal L, Wricke G (1989) Genetic analysis of DIA, GOT and PGI isozyme loci in Daucus carota L. ssp. sativus. Plan Breed 102:51–57 Wędzony M, Forster BP, Zur I, Golemiec E, Szechyńska-Hebda M, Dubas E, Gotębiowska G (2009) Progress in doubled haploid technology in higher plants. In: Touraev A, Forster BP, Jain SM (eds) Advances in Haploid Production in Higher Plants. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–14 Wremerth-Weich E, Levall M (2003) Doubled haploid production of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L). In: Maluszynski M, Kasha KJ, Forster BP, Szarejko I (eds) Doubled Haploid Production in Crop Plants – A Manual. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp 255–265 Van Geyt J, Speckmann GJ Jr, D’Halluin K, Jacobs M (1987) In vitro induction of haploid plants from unpollinated ovules and ovaries of the sugarbeet ( Beta vulgaris L). Theor Appl Genet 73:920–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00289399 Zheng K (1999) Effect of 2,4D-dichlorofenoxyacetic acid on callus induction and plant regeneration in anther culture of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L). Plant Cell Rep 19(1):69–73 Zhuzhzhalova TP, Podvigina OA, Znamenskaya VV, Vasil’chenko EN, Karpechenko NA, Zemlyanukhina OA (2016) Sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) haploid parthenogenesis in vitro: factors and diagnostic characters. Agricultural Biol 51(5):636–644. http://dx.doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2016.5.636eng Tables Table 1. The influence of the genotype on the gynogenesis induction in ovule in vitro culture of red beet, different media. Genotype Number of cultured ovules Number of obtained ELS Number of responding ovules Number of ELS per 100 ovules RA-10 48 1 1 2.1b* RA-11 48 1 1 2.1b RA-12 48 1 1 2.1b RA-13 24 0 0 0 RA-14 47 0 0 0 406 96 0 0 0 411 24 14 1 58.3a Opolski 216 2 2 0.9b * Combinations located in the same homogeneous group (with the same letter) do not differ statistically at a significance level of α = 0.05. Kruskal-Wallis test. Table 2. Effect of the medium on the gynogenesis efficiency in ovule cultures of red beet Opolski cultivar Medium Number cultured ovules ELS ELS per 100 plated ovules B 5 + 2,4D 80 2 2.5a* B 5 + BA, IAA 216 2 0.9a N 6 + 2,4D 128 2 1.6a N 6 + BA, IAA 54 0 0.0a * Combinations located in the same homogeneous group (with the same letter) do not differ statistically at a significance level of α = 0.05. Kruskal-Wallis test. Table 3. The effect of three sucrose concentrations (10,20,30 g l -3 ) in three media (MS, N6 B5) on the regeneration of shoots from ELS formed by gynogenesis in red beet „Opolski” cultivar. medium/sucrose concentration g l -3 Number of cultures ELS Multiplication - the average per 1 embryo Shoots without root Callus long more than 0.5 cm long less than 0.5 cm total number MS-10 62 0.40b* 0.83b* 1.23b* 2.78ab* MS-20 58 0.30b 0.88b 1.18b 2.89a MS-30 61 0.77a 2.11a 2.88a 2.56ab N6-10 60 0.22b 0.11bc 0.33cd 1.11b N6-20 63 0.11b 0.78b 0.89bc 1.44b N6-30 59 0.00b 0.00c 0.00d 2.00ab B5-10 61 0.00b 0.00c 0.00d 1.00b B5-20 58 0.00b 0.00c 0.00d 1.00b B5-30 58 0.00b 0.00c 0.00d 1.00b * Combinations located in the same homogeneous group (with the same letter) do not differ statistically at a significance level of α = 0.05. Kruskal-Wallis test. Table 4. The effect of PGR (BA 0.2 mg l -1 , IAA 1 mg l -1 , NAA 1 mg l -1 ) on the number of obtained regenerants from gynogenetic embryos of red beet on MS medium (breading line 411) – the average per 1 embryo. Medium Number of cultures ELS Frequency of plant regeneration Shoots Without regeneration with root without root BA, IAA 63 0,25a * 1,31a 0,02a BA, NAA 51 0,04b 1,68a 0,06a * Combinations located in the same homogeneous group (with the same letter) do not differ statistically at a significance level of α = 0.05. Kruskal-Wallis test. Table 5. Ploidy evaluation of gynogenetic plant material conducted during the multiplication of red beet plants. Genotype Number of rosettes Ploidy 1x 2x number % number % Opolski 18 18 100 0 0 411 24 24 100 0 0 RA 5 18 0 0 18 100 5/11 2 2 100 0 0 Table 6. The number of transcripts, on which the sequence reads were mapped for the tested red beet breeding line no 411. The total number of reference transcripts: 29.088 Plant indywiduals The number of reads mapped on transcripts >0 >10 >100 399 23.310 19.644 13.291 426 24.930 22.532 17.703 521 25.128 22.853 18.148 Table 7. The number and the character (heterozygosity/homozygosity) of the discovered sequence variants observed in the transcriptome of three plants line no 411 of red beet at various limits of the number of single sequence reads in the place of the occurance of tested variant. Plant indywiduals The number of all nucleotide/nucleotides reads including the variant >0 >20 >200 hetero*/in total hetero*/in total hetero*/in total 399 8.392/88.306 3.747/45.483 330/4.377 426 18.333 /163.238 12.870/111.444 701/17.318 521 18.750 /172.710 12.446/113.927 985/13.836 * NOTE: the numbers presented in the table as a „hetero” are reffering to the nuber of possible variants. The amount of places of their occurance in the analyzed transcripts of red beet was at least two times lower. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4841972","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":343579627,"identity":"c1ed8955-a37a-46b1-ad6a-bbfbddca268c","order_by":0,"name":"Waldemar Kiszczak","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3925-5233","institution":"Instytut Ogrodnictwa -PIB","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Waldemar","middleName":"","lastName":"Kiszczak","suffix":""},{"id":343579628,"identity":"28f07a5b-64df-454c-8ead-2ef1b9a5eedb","order_by":1,"name":"Maria Burian","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The National Institute of Horticultural Research","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Maria","middleName":"","lastName":"Burian","suffix":""},{"id":343579629,"identity":"255535a7-9bae-4644-9621-e9419b68e0ba","order_by":2,"name":"Tadeusz Malinowski","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The National Instititute of Horticultural Research","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tadeusz","middleName":"","lastName":"Malinowski","suffix":""},{"id":343579630,"identity":"5eb29cff-831e-4925-bc6b-a754c1849ed5","order_by":3,"name":"Małgorzata Podwyszyńska","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The National Institute of Horticultural Research","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Małgorzata","middleName":"","lastName":"Podwyszyńska","suffix":""},{"id":343579631,"identity":"810eb917-134f-4d50-b3f5-6c17e22a54a1","order_by":4,"name":"Urszula Kowalska","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The National Institute of Horticultural Research","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Urszula","middleName":"","lastName":"Kowalska","suffix":""},{"id":343579632,"identity":"5322f73f-ee53-4a7d-b69e-f5de252d83e2","order_by":5,"name":"Marcin Domaciuk","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Maria Curie-Sklodowska University: Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Sklodowskiej","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Marcin","middleName":"","lastName":"Domaciuk","suffix":""},{"id":343579633,"identity":"9d67e6f8-ecf5-4005-938d-d5380052fd2c","order_by":6,"name":"Krystyna Górecka","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Instytut Ogrodnictwa -PIB","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Krystyna","middleName":"","lastName":"Górecka","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-08-01 11:54:52","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4841972/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4841972/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":64909816,"identity":"8eeb941e-6a3d-4224-bc54-2a790e01d7bc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-20 09:33:00","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":123743,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e The successive development stages of gynogenetic plants of red beet: A) gynogenetic embryo, B) regenerating plant, C) fully developed gynogenetic plant, D) acclimatized gynogenetic plants.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4841972/v1/480a7ad6ad6f4a9c7f7341fa.jpg"},{"id":81510529,"identity":"0db7c17b-7b41-4626-a8db-1b74a8231d26","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-28 06:05:04","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1040154,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4841972/v1/3ec40daa-7561-4e2f-af5b-ca3debe466ef.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"Dihaploid plant production of red beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris), homozygosity evaluation using isoenzymatic and NGS methods","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eRed beet is a common crop plant distributed throughout Asia Minor, the Mediterranean, and Europe. It is also known as an economically important plant. Due to the high content of biologically active substances, in particular betanin, red beet is classified as a nutreocytic food.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCurrently, breeding of the new cultivar of crop plants is conducted with the use of the traditional and biotechnological methods. Gynogenesis is one of the utilized methods, which allows researchers to obtain haploid plants and double haploid lines (DH) in a short period of time.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHaploid plants became a valuable source for basic research such as genome mapping, genetic analyses, mutations, transformation, somatic hybridization, biochemical and physiological analyses, cytogenetic research, reference genome sequencing and genetic linkage analysis (Ferrie and M\u0026ouml;llers \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). Most often, however, they are used in plant breeding programmes. So far intensive research on production of haploid plants using gynogenesis were conducted mainly on sugar beet. First haploid plants of red beet were obtained by Hosemans and Bossoutrot in 1983 with the efficiency of 23 haploid plants produced from 10000 ovules (Hosemans and Bossoutrot \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1983\u003c/span\u003e). Subsequently, the successful induction of plant regeneration from unpollinated ovules was reported by Bossoutrot and Hosemans (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1985\u003c/span\u003e). Since then many researchers obtained embryos by gynogenesis in sugar beet, e.g. G\u0026uuml;rel et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e; Nagl et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e; Tomaszewska-Sowa \u003cspan citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; Aflaki et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Pazuki et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e. For red beet, Barański (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e) obtained few haploid plants using gynogenesis. In 2021, two research teams confirmed the obtaining of haploid red beet plants by \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e gynogenesis (Zayachkovskaya et al. 2021; Kiszczak et al. 2021) and in 2023 by Kiszczak et al. The process of induced gynogenesis is determined by numerous endogenous and exogenous factors such as the genotype and the composition of induction and regeneration media. Genotypes vary greatly in their ability to form a gynogenetic embryo or plant regeneration (G\u0026uuml;rel et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e; Klimek-Chodacka and Barański 2013; Pazuki 2017). Barański (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e) observed that ovules collected from donor plants with stable cultivar genotypes had a greater gynogenic ability than the ovules of hybrids or inbred lines. Other studies have confirmed genotypic differences in the efficiency of androgenesis, but have not indicated that these differences are significant between stable varieties and inbred lines (Zayachkovskaya et al. 2021; Kiszczak et al. 2021). In general, media based on N6 (Chu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1975\u003c/span\u003e) and MS (Murashige and Skoog \u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1962\u003c/span\u003e) containing various growth regulator combinations were used to induce gynogenesis (Weich and Levall \u003cspan citationid=\"CR77\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e; Aflaki et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Pazuki et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). Doctrinal et. al (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1989\u003c/span\u003e) showed the positive effect of indole-1-acetic acid (IAA), 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) or kinetin (KIN) applied in N6 medium on the gynogenesis process in sugar beet. Gośka et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e) obtained gynogenetic embryos on the MS medium supplemented with BAP and naphthalene-3-cetic acid (NAA). The addition of activated charcoal and AgNO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e to MS medium has also been shown to increase gynogenesis capacity in sugar beet (G\u0026uuml;rel et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e). Also Pazuki et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) successfully applied MS medium with the addition of BAP. Barański (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e) used N6 medium with the addition of IAA and BAP to induce gynogenesis in red beet. However, after obtaining gynogenetic embryos Barański (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e) did not achieve the direct conversion of sugar beet embryos into plants. Different authors obtained better results in androgenesis using IMB medium supplemented with TDZ (Zayachkovskaya et al. 2021) and B5 medium with the addition of IAA, BA and putrescine (Kiszczak et al. 2021; Kiszczak et al. 2023).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eZayachkovskaya et al. (2021) obtained direct regeneration of callus in plants on MS medium containing BAP and GA\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e, but the root system was weak, therefore passages of shoots were performed several times to medium without hormones. Kiszczak et al. (2021 and 2023) obtained plants with well-developed root system on MS medium supplemented with BA and IAA, however more shoots regenerated on medium with the addition of BA and Put. In the next stage, obtained shoots were rooted on \u0026frac12; MS medium containing NAA and Put.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSuccessful regeneration and adaptation are the most important stages in the whole procedure of deriving gynogenetic plants, but only ploidy level and homozygosity evaluation can confirm the obtaining of haploids or DH plants. The ploidy level of gynogenetic plants, can be confirmed by determination of the nuclear DNA content using flow cytometry (Bohanec \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Oliveira et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Keles et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). The above-mentioned authors have successfully used flow cytometry for ploidy evaluation of red beet (Zayachkovskaya et al. 2021; Kiszczak et al. 2021; Kiszczak 2023). Plants obtained in the process of gynogenesis should also have their homozygosity confirmed. Evaluation of isoenzyme polymorphism is commonly used to confirm the homozygosity of various plant species obtained in the gynogenesis process (Murovec and Bohanec \u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). In case of red beet, authors have applied two isoenzymatic systems (Kiszczak et al. 2021; Kiszczak et al. 2023).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccording to Djedatin et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e), next generation sequencing (NGS) is less expensive, more effective and quicker method of detection to determine the homozygotic arrangement of alleles in the genome. NGS is known to be the most precise method that provides an immense amount of bioinformatic data. With advances of the NGS technology and DNA sequencing, it was possible to use accurate genotyping as a tool for the genetic and evolutionary studies or in the process of accelerating the breeding processes (Song et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Wang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). Polymorphism of the genome, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), is determined in the NGS method (Kumar 2012; Gupta et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). The spontaneous doubling of the genetic material often occurs in the gynogenesis process, which in case of the allelic forms of genes in tested isoenzymes, can cause difficulties for determination of the gametic origin of those plants. According to Djedatin et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e), the most effective method for detection of the duplication of entire segments of the genome or even single genes is the NGS method. The above-mentioned method is very suitable for the isolation of homozygotic populations found in a transgenesis procedure (Passricha et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). O'Malley et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) used results obtained from NGS for the isolation of homozygotic mutants from the population of \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis thaliana\u003c/em\u003e. Earlier in 2016, NGS sequencing, in concert with Bulk Segregant Analysis, allowed researchers to accelerate the identification of causal mutations with a reference genome sequence in the sugar beet (Ries et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). Szklarczyk et al. (2016) applied NGS as a supplementary method for the identification of mitochondrial DNA characteristics, which diversified the cytoplasmatic male sterile and male fertile forms of sugar beet. On the other hand, so far there is no information in the literature about the application of this method in the studies on the genome of red beet.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of various factors on the gynogenesis process and to obtain regenerated, haploid plants of red beet. Different important factors for the gynogenesis process were under study, i.e. the induction medium, the genotype, media for gynogenesis induction and plant regeneration, acclimatization process. Ploidy of obtained plants was also evaluated and the usability of isoenzyme polymorphism analysis for the determination of homozygosity was tested. The correlation between the isoenzyme polymorphism and the analysis of the base pairs order in the genome of red beet on the basis of NGS were examined. The NSG analysis was also performed in order to obtain data that will be used in the databases. Thanks to the information included in the database, researchers will be able to design molecular markers and perform comparative transcriptomics. Knowing the nucleotide sequence of the genome or the transcriptome, it will be also possible to find single nucleotide mutations (SNPs) or simple nucleotide sequence repeats (SSRs).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Materials and methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1 Preparation of plant material\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eRoots of various red beet genotypes were used, including the \u0026lsquo;Opolski\u0026rsquo; cultivar, as a standard, and ten breeding lines delivered by cooperating Breeding and Seed Company - POLAN Sp. z o.o. in Cracow. Received plants with heterozygosity confirmed by breeding methods were planted in a substrate consisting of 1:3 (v/v) sand and soil and placed in a cold chamber at 4\u0026deg;C for two-month vernalization. Then, roots were planted in plastic containers with a capacity of 20 l (two roots per container) in a growth chamber under controlled growth conditions at 18\u0026deg;C during the day and 16\u0026deg;C at night, with a 16 hour photoperiod.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2 General research plan\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the first stage of the study, the protocol for gynogenetic plant production was optimized for each red beet genotype. In the second stage, gynogenetic plants of \u0026lsquo;Opolski\u0026rsquo; and various breeding lines RA-5, RA-10, RA-11, RA-12, RA-13, RA-14, 406, 411, 4/11, 5/11 were produced using the optimized protocol. Initial research and then research on determining the composition of the medium that guarantees the formation of embryos were conducted on the 'Opolski' variety. In the following year, apart from other genotypes, mainly optimization of the PGR composition was carried out on the 411 breeding line. At the stage of multiplication, the ploidy of obtained multiplication was analysed using flow cytometer.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eShoots of breeding line no. 411 with cytometrically confirmed haploid number of chromosomes were placed on a solidified MS medium containing 5 g L⁻\u0026sup1; colchicine for 5 min (Pazuki eta al. 2018) and then transferred onto MS media supplemented with 0.2 mg L⁻\u0026sup1; BAP and 1 mg L⁻\u0026sup1; IAA, on which roots have developed from shoots. Plants with confirmed homozygosity were given to breeders, who included received plant material in their breeding programs.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3 Optimization of the protocol for gynogenetic plant production\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3.1 Gynogenesis induction\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eGreen, immature flower buds with unfolded petals of the \u0026lsquo;Opolski\u0026rsquo; cultivar and breeding lines (in first season RA-10, RA-11, RA-12, RA-13, RA-14, 406, 411 and RA-5, 4/11, 5/11, 411 in the next season) were disinfected with 70% ethanol for 10 min and washed 2 times in sterile distilled water. Ovules were isolated from disinfected flower buds under a stereoscopic microscope. Using preparation needles, 24 ovules were placed in one Erlenmeyer flasks (100 ml) containing 30 ml of medium (media described below). All induction media were supplemented with 100 g l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e sucrose and solidified with 6.5 g l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e agar. The pH of all media was adjusted to 5.8 (Barański \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e). The ovule cultures were kept at 27\u0026deg;C and continuous light (24 hours a day) with photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 30 \u0026micro;mol m\u003csup\u003e-2\u003c/sup\u003e s\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e. Formation of embryo-like structures (ELS) took place after 6\u0026ndash;14 weeks. The efficiency of the gynogenesis process was defined by the number of obtained embryos per 100 planted ovules (%).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the first experiment, frequency of ELS formation was compared among all tested genotypes. Ovules were plated on the B5 (Gamborg et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1968\u003c/span\u003e) induction medium supplemented with 0.5 mg l\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e BAP and 0.2 mg l\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e IAA. This medium proved to be the most effective for inducing red beet gynogenesis in the preliminary studies conducted by the authors in the previous year. In the second experiment, the effect of medium composition on gynogenesis frequency was studied. Ovules of red beet \u0026lsquo;Opolski\u0026rsquo; were cultured on N6 media (Chu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1975\u003c/span\u003e) or modified B5 (with the addition of 500 mg l\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e L-glutamine and 100 mg l\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e L-serine) supplemented with 0.1 mg l\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e 2,4-D (G\u0026oacute;recka et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) in the first variant or 0.2 mg l\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e BAP and 0.5 mg l\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e IAA in the second variant (Barański \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e; G\u0026oacute;recka et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3.2 Plant regeneration\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudies on optimalization of plant regeneration were conducted on the ELSs of \u0026lsquo;Opolski\u0026rsquo; cultivar and breeding line No. 411 obtained from ovule cultures. The effect of medium composition and sucrose concentration was examined. The ELS were transferred to the media selected in the preliminary studies as an optimal media for this stage, consisting of the N6 medium containing 0.2 BAP mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e, B5 medium without hormones and MS medium supplemented with 1 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e TDZ with the addition of sucrose at concentrations of 10, 20, or 30 g l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAll tested media were solidified with 6.5 g l\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e agar, pH adjusted to 5.6 (Ghosh et al., 2013). ELS were cultured in a 30 ml tube containing 10 ml of medium, placed in a growth room and exposed to continuous light with PPFD of 30 \u0026micro;mol m\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e s\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e (16 hours a day) at a temperature of 20\u0026deg;C. Observations were made after six weeks of culture. One embryo was placed in each of the 10 tubes containing the tested media.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the next experiment, ELSs were transferred onto the MS regeneration medium containing 1 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e BAP with the addition of 30 g l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e sucrose. Six weeks later, regenerating plants were placed on MS medium with BAP at a lower concentration of 0.2 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e, supplemented with various auxins, IAA or NAA each at the concentration of 1 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e. Observation of frequency and quality of regenerated plants was conducted after four weeks. At this stage, ploidy analysis was performed using a flow cytometer.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3.3 Acclimatization\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlants underwent the acclimatization process in order to conduct further studies on methods of chromosome doubling. Eighteen fully developed plants of red beet breeding line No. 411 were rinsed in distilled water after removing from the tubes, dipped for a second in 2% Kaptan solution, planted in multipots containing peat and sand medium (1:3, v/v), in high humidity conditions in a plastic tunnel, in a growth chamber at a temperature of 20\u0026deg;C during the day and 18\u003csup\u003e\u0026deg;\u003c/sup\u003eC at night and the light intensity of 30 \u0026micro;mol m\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e s\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e for 16 hours. After 3\u0026ndash;4 weeks, the plastic tunnel was gradually ventilated to reduce the humidity. In the fifth week, an observation of adapted plants was made. In the final stage, adapted plants were transplanted to pots and cultured in the same growth chamber.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3.4 Ploidy evaluation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePloidy of gynogenetic plants was indirectly evaluated by establishing the nuclear DNA content using a PAII flow cytometer (Partec GmbH, M\u0026uuml;nster, Germany). Young leaves collected at the stage of multiplication from the breeding line No. 411 and other genotypes after plant acclimatization were used as plant material for ploidy analysis. Tha basic Partec buffer with the addition of PVP 40 was used. Isolated cell nuclei were stained with DAPI at a concentration of 0.1 mg l\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e. Five hundred up to one thousand nuclei were analyzed in each sample.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3.5 Homozygosity evaluation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eHomozygosity was evaluated using isoenzymes and NGS for the selected putative obtained from. 399, 426 and 521 of breeding line No. 411, which was produced using the optimized protocol developed in the first research stage.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section4\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3.5.1 Isoenzyme system\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo assess homozygosity of plants obtained in ovule cultures (genotype No. 411), two isoenzymes were analyzed: phosphohexose isomerase (EC:5.3.1.9, PGI) and aspartato aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.1, AAT) (Westphal and Wricke \u003cspan citationid=\"CR78\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1989\u003c/span\u003e; Kiszczak et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). Electrophoresis was conducted on a 10% starch gel according to the Gottlieb method (1973). Separation of enzymes was performed according to the Selander et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1971\u003c/span\u003e) protocol. Weeden and Gottlieb\u0026rsquo;s method (1980) was used for visualization of polymorphism of tested isoenzymes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section4\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3.5.2 NGS\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThree plants No. 399, 426 and 521 of breeding line No. 411, maintained in \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e conditions have been used for this analysis. Total RNA was used for the preparation of cDNA libraries (and further transcriptome analysis) was obtained from red beetroot plants grown \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e. About 400 mg of leaves and stems were used for RNA isolation from each one of the three plant lines. Plant/fungi total RNA Purification kit (Norgen Biotek #25800) was used according to the procedure recommended by a manufacturer with a minor modification \u0026ndash; added two extra washes of the column before elution of purified RNA. Eluted RNA was precipitated overnight at -20\u0026deg;C after addition of 1/10 volume of 3 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2, and 2.5 volumes of cold (-20\u0026deg;C) 99% ethanol. Purified RNA was pelleted by centrifugation (30 minutes at 14,000 rpm; 4\u0026deg;C), washed twice with cold (-20\u0026deg;C) 80% ethanol, dried at room temperature, resuspended in water and DNAsed using Turbo DNAse (Life Technologies kit #AM 1907) according to a standard procedure. DNAsed RNA was precipitated, washed and resuspended finally in autoclaved MilliQ water (18.2 MΩ). Verification of the quality and concentration of the preparation was based on UV absorbance measurements in the range 140\u0026ndash;220 nm (NanoDrop) and electrophoretic profile in a non-denaturing 2% agarose gel. Purified RNA was aliquoted and stored at -70\u0026deg;C.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3.6 Sequencing of cDNA and construction of cDNA libraries\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePreparations of total RNA have been sent to a commercial company Genomed S.A., (Warsaw, Poland). RiboZero cDNA libraries have been constructed there and sequenced on Illumina HiSeq platform. The total number of 100 nts paired reads obtained for the three plants analyzed: 399, 426 and 521, was 17,755,074, 57,828,394 and 41,841,448, respectively. Raw data (demultiplexed but neither trimmed, nor filtered for the quality) have been sent back to our laboratory, where further bioinformatic analysis was performed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3.7 Bioinformatic analysis.\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBioinformatic analysis was performed using CLC Bio Genomics Workbench software and services like BLAST provided by NCBI. The raw reads have been trimmed and filtered for quality, then mapped to a reference transcriptome of sugar beet (\u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e) published by Dohm et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e). The reference consisted of 29,088 contigs of average length 1,526 nts. The percentage of reads mapped successfully was 93.10, 93.59, and 93.48% of their total number for three samples. From 83.03\u0026ndash;84.98% reads were mapped in pairs, with the observed distance in pairs from 83\u0026ndash;334 nts, which increased their effective length. Library reads were mapped (separately for every sample) based on the sequence of 29,088 transcripts read for sugar beet (Dohm et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3.8 Statistical analyses\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA flask containing 48 ovules was counted as a repetition in conducted experiments. The number of repetitions varied in a particular experiment and was dependent on the availability of plant material. Obtained data were analyzed using ANOVA/MANOVA multivariate models and non-parametric analyses such as the Kruskal and Wallis (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1952\u003c/span\u003e), at an adopted level of significance of α\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistica 8.0 software package for Windows (StatSoft Inc. Tulsa, USA).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3 Results","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGynogensis induction\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe highest percentage of gynogenetic ELS/100 ovules (58.3) was obtained in red beet breeding line No. 411 and the lowest in \u0026lsquo;Opolski\u0026rsquo; (0.9 ELS/100) (Table 1). No embryos were obtained in three breeding lines (RA-13, RA-14 and 406).\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eThe most effective medium for the gynogenesis induction in red beet was B5 medium supplemented with 0.1 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sup\u003e2,4-D (Table 2). On this medium, 2.5 out of 100 planted ovules formed ELSs. Whereas, on N6 medium, in the presence of 2,4-D, 1.6 embryos per 100 ovules were produced. No embryos were formed on N6 medium containing BAP and IAA.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.2 Plant regeneration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Regenerated shoots of various quality and/or callus formation were obtained after transferring gynogenetic embryos with a different frequency depending on regeneration media (MS, N6 and B5) and sucrose concentration (10, 20 and 30 g l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e) (Table 3). The highest number of shoots was obtained on MS medium containing 30 g l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e sucrose, that is 2,88 average per 1 embryo, also the highest number of callus (2,89 per 1 embryo) was observed on MS medium. No shoots developed from gynogenetic embryos on B5 medium; however, a small amount of callus formation was observed. On the most effective regeneration medium (MS supplemented with 30 g l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e sucrose) the effect of growth regulators (BAP in combination with IAA or NAA) was examined on shoot development of red beet breeding line No. 411. Obtained results indicate that whole plants with a well-developed root system can be obtained on media supplemented with both types of auxin combined with BAP (Table 4). However, the higher number of well developed plants was obtained on medium containing 0.2 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e BA and 1 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sup\u003eIAA. All regenerated plants (18) of this cultivar were planted \u003cem\u003eex vitro\u003c/em\u003e and 39% survived the acclimatization process.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.3 Ploidy evaluation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll tested plants of \u0026lsquo;Opolski\u0026rsquo; red beet, 411, 5/11 breeding lines consisted of DNA equivalent to a haploid number of chromosomes (Table 5). Plants RA-5 breeding line consisted of DNA equivalent to a diploid number of chromosomes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.4 Homozygosity \u0026ndash; isozyme analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Homozygosity analysis of gynogenetic plants from breeding line No. 411 showed that in case of PGI isoenzyme, 95% of examined plants were homozygotes and 5% were heterozygotes. Regarding the AAT isoenzyme, 70% of these plants were homozygous, 23% heterozygous and for the remaining 7%, due to the illegible polymorphism of bands, we were not able to confirm their homozygosity.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.5 Homozygosity \u0026ndash;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNGS\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNinety three percent of reads were successfully mapped for each from the three tested genotypes, from which 83% to 85% was mapped in pairs. For the set of 29,088 reference transcripts with a total length of 44,686,800 nucleotides, the following fragments were mapped respectively: 16,530,673 fragments (total length of mapped fragments: 1,645,771,149 nts) for sample No. 399, 56,121,204 fragments (5,398,960,791 nts) for sample No. 426, 39,111,596 fragments (3,901,891,001 nts) for sample No. 521. The number of sugar beet transcripts, to which reads obtained for the samples of red beet were mapped (with the applied mapping parameters: 60%, 80%), is presented in Table 6. A list of observed variants was made for every tested plant (in a simplified form: the differences in sequence in comparison with the reference transcripts).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.6 Bioinformatic analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDuring analysis, the possibility of the occurrence of sequencing errors was taken into consideration, therefore an advanced software with sophisticated algorithms was used for the elimination or reduction of those errors. The possibility of the presence of several copies of the same genes was also considered. In the course of analysis, 172,710 potenial variants diversifying transcriptome of sugar beet and tested breeding lines of red beet were identified, which in conclusion gave 86,355 potential spots of difference. For more than 95% of those spots, the heterozygosity of tested plants was not specified (399, 426 and 521). The remainder of the sequence was fully homozygotic. Approximately 20,000.identical single nucleotides were tested in the reference transcriptome. During the analysis, all chromosomes (nine) were identified by at least 400 transcriptomes (genes or their fragments). For each chromosome of tested breeding line of red beet at least 4,000 variants (SNV, MSV or ins/del) were analyzed for the homozygosity (Table 7).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"4. Disscusion","content":" \u003cp\u003eGenotype is the most important factor, which determines the plant capacity to enter the gynogenesis process (Datta, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e). Gynogenesis is very difficult to induce in many species. Difference in the capacity to enter the gametic embryogenesis by female gametic cells between different species, cultivars, breeding lines and even between particular individuals were described by several authors, e.g., G\u0026oacute;recka et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e) and Segui-Simmaro and Nuez (2008). Significant differences in gynogenetic capacity between genotypes also occurred in red beet that was reported by several authors (Barański \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e; G\u0026uuml;rel et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e; Tomaszewska-Sowa \u003cspan citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e, Zayachkovskaya et al. 2021; Kiszczak et al. 2021; Kiszczak 2023) Barański (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e) observed gynogenesis in all tested red beet cultivars, but the frequency of embryo formation was dependent on genotype and ranged from 0-2.86%.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the 2021, Zayachkovskaya et al. obtained a higher induction factor dependent on the genotype, up to 25% of induced ovules. The highest gynogenesis efficiency of 33% was obtained by Kiszczak et al. (2023). In their studies, the number of obtained gynogenetic embryos was dependent on the genotype. In presented studies, we also confirmed that the efficiency of gynogenesis depends on the genotype. In the breeding line, we found the presence of embryos in over 58.3% of ovules, but e.g. in the RA-13 line, no gynogenetic sources were observed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMedium composition is one of the most important factors in the induction of haploids either in the process of androgenesis or gynogenesis. Barański (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e) discovered that the highest number of regenerants was observed on N6 medium (by Chu), during the application of a combination of 0.5 mg/L IAA and 0.2 mg/L 6-BAP. While the addition of silver nitrate (22 mg/L) to the IMB medium with the addition of 0.4 mg/L TDZ increased the number of induced ovules in all genotypes (Zayachkovskaya et al. 2021). In the studies conducted by Kiszczak et al. (2023), comparing B5 and N6 media, which both contained 0.5 mg L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e IAA, 0.2 mg L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e BA and supplemented with 322 mg L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e Put or 290 mg L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e Spd, the significantly higher numbers of embryos were obtained on B5 medium. Results of presented study showed that the most effective medium proved to be the B5 medium containing 0.1 mg l\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e 2,4-D. Considerably fewer or even no embryos were obtained on N6 media.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBarański (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e) noted that the use of N6 medium supplemented with 0.5 mg l\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e IAA and 0.2 mg l\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e BA was the most effective in red beet embryo formation from ovules. We did not receive any gynogenetic embryos on this medium, while the highest number of embryos was received on B5 medium with the addition of 2,4-D. The above-mentioned auxin has the best ability to induce cell divisions and callus differentiation (Zheng et al. 1999) and its usability for inducing gynogenesis process in plants was confirmed by various authors (Rekha et al. 2013; Alan et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). However, in case of sugar beet, on N6 medium supplemented with this auxin, Doctrinal et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1989\u003c/span\u003e) did not observe any increase of gynogenesis frequency. In the studies presented by Kiszczak et al. 2023, this auxin paired with B5 medium did not cause a significant increase in the number of gynogenetic embryos, similarly to the N6 medium. Although authors obtained gynogenetic embryos in two experimental variants of 2.4-D medium, however the number of obtained gynogenetic embryos differed significantly from the other medium variants, which also contained polyamines: putrescine and spermidine. In our study, in the presence of 2,4-D, considerably fewer embryos were obtained on the N6 medium compared to the B5 medium.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlant regeneration is the next very important stage in the process of obtaining DH plants via gametic embryogenesis (G\u0026oacute;recka et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Kiszczak et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Medium is one of the main factors affecting the efficiency of plant regeneration in this process (Segui-Simarro and Nuez \u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e; Wędzony et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR79\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). In sugar beet, G\u0026uuml;rel et al. (1998) applied medium on the base of MS containing 2.0 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e BAP for the regeneration of shoots from unfertilized ovaries and the medium with 2.0 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e NAA and 2.0 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e AgNO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e for the rooting. Weich and Levall (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR77\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e) conducted the regeneration process in three stages using media on the base of MS with the addition of kinetin and NAA for shoot formation and with the addition of IBA for the root induction (pre-rooting). In 2017, Pazuki carried out the regeneration process in one stage using MS medium, but with the addition of BAP, that resulted in 18.98% of plants. Direct germination and formation of microrosettes occurred when the embryoid was placed on regenerating MS medium with the addition of 1 mg/L BAP and 0.1 mg/L GA\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e (Zayachkovskaya et al. 2021). However, in these experiments, the shoots did not develop or developed roots poorly, therefore additional passages on the hormone-free MS medium were performed. Other researchers obtained direct regeneration into plants on MS medium supplemented with 0.2 mg L\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e BA and 1 mg L\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e IAA, but this method was inefficient (Kiszczak et al. 2023). Therefore, regeneration from callus was conducted in two stages. Authors regenerated shoots on MS medium supplemented with BA and 0.5 mg L\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e putrescine and rhizogenesis was conducted on MS medium containing \u0026frac12; MS macronutrients and supplemented with NAA at the concentrations of 1 or 3 mg L\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e and Put at 0.5 or 160 mg L\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e. In our studies, higher numbers of fully developed plants (reaching 10%) were obtained on MS medium, compared to N6 and B5 media. This confirms that MS-based media are the most suitable for regeneration of plants from gynogenetic embryos in red beet. The authors applied the standard of 30 g l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e of sucrose. The increased presence of callus in our studies was due to the application of 0.2 mg l \u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e BAP and 1 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e NAA for the regeneration of red beet embryos. Similar results were demonstrated earlier by Gurel et al. (2000). Authors applied the same combination of two growth regulators in the concentration of 1 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e BAP and 0.5 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e NAA. They observed a higher amount of formed callus comparing to other media used for the regeneration in \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e cultures of sugar beet.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn presented studies, only haploids underwent the acclimatization process, which in general are characterized by lower vigor (Murovec and Bohanec \u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). In case of sugar beet, Gośka et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e) selected only diploid gynogenetic plants for the acclimatization, which allowed approximately 95% of plants to adapt to \u003cem\u003eex vitro\u003c/em\u003e conditions. In 2012, Tomaszewska-Sowa acclimatized almost 80% of gynogenetic plants of sugar beet. Some authors are emphasizing the special significance of the root system for the efficiency of acclimatizations (Salvi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). Our observations of the acclimatization process of carrot androgenetic plants (Kiszczak et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e) and current studies on the gynogenetic red beet regenerants confirm this thesis. It is most likely that one of the reasons a low percentage of plants in our experiments adapted was the very poor root system of haploid plants.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur research has shown that the tendency to spontaneously double the chromosome number was strongly dependent on the genotype. All the gynogenetic plants of \u0026lsquo;Opolski\u0026rsquo; red beet and two breeding lines RA 5, 5/11 were haploids, whereas in one breeding line 4/11 and 411 all gynogenetic plants were diploids. The emergence of breeding line with a doubled set of chromosomes is probably related to the occurrence of the phenomenon of endoreduplication (Joubes and Chevalier 2000). Strong DNA endoreduplication was also observed during flow cytometry analysis in our study. Lukaszewska et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e) observed this phenomenon in \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e cultures of sugar beet. Authors showed that the application of medium with NAA at a concentration of 1 mg l\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, the same concentration as used in our experiments, intensified the process of endoreduplication. These observations indicate that doubling the chromosome number may be associated with tendency for a given genotype to endoreduplication.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuring the homozygosity analysis with the use of two isoenzymatic systems, PGI and AAT, the polymorphism that allowed recognition of homozygote from heterozygote was obtained for the PGI isoenzymatic system. Sabir et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e) showed the usability of this isoenzymatic system for the analysis of the somaclonal variation frequency in plant material of sugar beet and chard, propagated \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e. Authors also observed polymorphism in the PGI system, whereas the AAT system did not generate any variations in the bands. Ludina and Levites (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e) assigned the absence of the polymorphism for the malate dehydrogenase isoenzyme in the studies on the population of sugar beet to the not-allelic character of isoenzymes located in various cellular organelles. This finding indicates that genes of an isoenzyme, such as AAT, can be inherited with deviation from standard Mendel\u0026rsquo;s law. The appearance of a heterozygotic pattern of bands for both isoenzymes in tested population, may be due to the reasons explained above, also described by Levites et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e). In conducted studies, authors demonstrated that spontaneous polyploidization caused by their prolonged culturing occurs in the haploid tissues of sugar beet under \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e conditions. According to their results, the emergence of heterozygotes in polymorphic populations regarding the isocitrate dehydrogenase and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in combination with the simultaneous homozygotic profile for the other isoenzyme in the same plants indicate the occurrence of spontaneous polyploidization.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEvaluation of the homozygosity of three red beet plants (399, 426 and 521 breeding lines) was performed on the basis of the transcriptome analysis (read with the use of the high-throughput sequencing and NGS) in terms of the occurrence of different variants of nucleotide sequences (SNV, MNV, ins/del). Results presented in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e indicate that even in consideration of only reference transcripts, for which at least 100 mapped reads were obtained (approximately 100 nts each), conducted analysis included from 45\u0026ndash;62% of potential red beet genes. High percentage (93%) of mapped reads, when adding the reads mapped in pairs with the distance in line with the expectations, indicates the high reliability of obtained results. Lower percentage of mapped reads was obtained by various researchers in other plant species, for example Wang et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e) achieved 70% of mapped reads in corn. Obtained results are considered to be significant only when 95% of genes are mapped in comparison with cDNA databases (Claros et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). Analysis was performed on the transcripts originated from all red beet chromosomes, which allowed for the detection of potential aberrations during the chromosome duplication. The occurance of well documented (over 200 single reads) cases of simultaneous presence of two variants (heterozygosity) was discovered on every tested chromosome. However, the overwhelming part of the genome had a homozygotic character (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). The appearance of false segmental duplications in the assemblies, which occurs when heterozygous sequences from two haplotypes are assembled into separate contigs and are scaffolded adjacent to each other rather than being merged, this is the main problem during the analysis of the material derived from a heterozygotic plant (Kelley and Salzberg \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). This can also be referred to as the process of spontaneous doubling of chromosomes that occur while obtaining plants through gynogenesis. Therefore, part of the 200 single reads may be incorrectly categorized, which in reality leads to the appearance of a greater number of homozygotic variants. It should be emphasized that the applied method was considerably more sensitive to the detection of differentiation variants (heterozygosity) in the tested genomes in comparison to the classic methods.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contributions\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWaldemar Kiszczak, Maria Burian, Tadeusz Malinowski, Małgorzata Podwyszyńska, Krystyna G\u0026oacute;recka contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Waldemar Kiszczak, Krystyna G\u0026oacute;recka and Maria Burian. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Waldemar Kiszczak, Krystyna G\u0026oacute;recka and Małgorzata Podwyszyńska and they authors and Marcin Domaciuk read and approved the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgments\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eResearch funded by Polish Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, task No 65 entitled: \u0026ldquo;Receiving homozygous red beet plants with the use of gametic embryogenesis\u0026rdquo;.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAflaki F, Pazuki A, Gurel S, Stevanato P, Biancardi E, Gurel E (2017) Doubled haploid sugar beet: an integrated view of factors influencing the processes of gynogenesis and chromosome doubling. Int Sugar J 119:884\u0026ndash;895. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1331-3_21\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-1-0716-1331-3_21\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlan AR, Celebi TF, Kaska A (2016) Production and evaluation of gynogenic leek (\u003cem\u003eAllium ampeloprasum\u003c/em\u003e L.) plants. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 125:249\u0026ndash;259. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-016-0944-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11240-016-0944-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAndersen SB, Christiansen I, Farestveit B (1990) Carrot (\u003cem\u003eDaucus carota\u003c/em\u003e L.). In Vitro production of haploids and field trials. In: Bajaj YPS (ed). Biotechnol Agric For 12:393\u0026ndash;402\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAsif M (2013) Progress and Opportunities of Doubled Haploid Production. Springer Briefs Plant Sci 6:1\u0026ndash;75. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00732-8_6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-3-319-00732-8_6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBarański R (1996) In vitro gynogenesis efficiency in red beet (\u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e L) Effect of ovule culture conditions. Acta Soc Bot Pol 65:57\u0026ndash;60\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBohanec B, Jakse M, Ihanb A, Javornik B (1995) Studies of gynogenesis in onion (\u003cem\u003eAllium cepa\u003c/em\u003e L.): Induction procedures and genetic analysis of regenerants. Plant Sci 104:215\u0026ndash;224\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBohanec B (2013) Ploidy determination using flow cytometry. In: Maluszynski M (ed)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDoubled Haploid Production in Crop Plants IV pp 397\u0026ndash;403. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1293-4_52\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-94-017-1293-4_52\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBossoutrot D, Hosemans D (1985) Gynogenesis in Beta vulgaris L: From in vitro culture to the\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eproduction of doubled haploids plants in soil. Plant Cell Rep 4:300\u0026ndash;303\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eClaros MG, Bautista R, Guerrero-Fern\u0026aacute;ndez D, Benzerki H, Seoane P, Fern\u0026aacute;ndez-Pozo N (2012) Why assembling plant genome sequences is so challenging. Biology 1:439\u0026ndash;459. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/biology1020439\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/biology1020439\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOliveira CEG, Chamma DLM, Oliveira BF, Von PRG, Nayara ST (2013) Identification of haploid maize by flow cytometry, morphological and molecular markers. Ci\u0026ecirc;ncia Agrotec 37(1):25\u0026ndash;11. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542013000100003\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1590/S1413-70542013000100003\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChu CC, Wang CC, Sun CS, Hsu KC, Yin KC, Chu CY, Bi FY (1975) Establishment of anefficient medium for anther culture of rice through comparative experiments on the nitrogen sources. Sci Sinica 18:659\u0026ndash;668\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDatta SK (2005) Androgenic haploids: Factors controlling development and its application in crop improvement. Curr Sci 89(11):1870\u0026ndash;1878\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDjedatin G, Monat C, Engelen S, Sabot F (2017) Duplication Detector. a light weight tool for\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eduplication detection using NGS data Curr Plant Biol 9(10):23\u0026ndash;28\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2017.07.001\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.cpb.2017.07.001\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDoctrinal M, Sangwan RS, Sangwan-Norreel BS (1989) In vitro gynogenesis in \u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e L. Effects of plant growth regulators, temperature, genotypes and season. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 17:1\u0026ndash;12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDohm JC, Minoche AE, Holtgrawe D, Capella-Gutierrez S, Zakrzewski F, Tafer H, Rupp O, Sorensen T, Stracke R, Reinhardt R, Goesmann A, Kraft T, Schulz B, Stadler PF, Schmidt T, Gabaldon T, Lehrach H, Weisshaar B, Himmelbauer H (2014) The genome of the recently domesticated crop plant sugar beet (\u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e). 505(7484):546\u0026ndash;549. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/nature12817\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/nature12817\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFerrie AMR, M\u0026ouml;llers (2011) Haploids and doubled haploids in Brassica spp. for genetic and genomic research. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 104(3):375\u0026ndash;186. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9831-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11240-010-9831-4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGalatowitsch MW, Smith GA (1990) Regeneration from unfertilized ovule callus of sugar beet (\u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e L). Can J Plant Sci 70:83\u0026ndash;89\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50:148\u0026ndash;151\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGośka M (1985) Sugar beet haploids obtained in the in vitro culture. Bull Pol Acad Sci Biol Sci 33:31\u0026ndash;33\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGośka M, Krysińska T, Strycharczuk K (2004) The use of in vitro gynogenesis for obtaining sugar beet dihaploids. IHAR Bull. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1331-3_20\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-1-0716-1331-3_20\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. 234:27\u0026thinsp;\u0026ndash;\u0026thinsp;14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGottlieb LD (1973) Enzyme differentiation and phylogeny in \u003cem\u003eClarkia franciscana\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eC. rubicunda\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eC. amoena\u003c/em\u003e. Evol 27:205\u0026ndash;214\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eG\u0026oacute;recka K, Krzyżanowska D, Kiszczak W, G\u0026oacute;recki R (2005) Embryo induction in anther culture of \u003cem\u003eDaucus carota\u003c/em\u003e L. Veg Crop Res Bull 63:25\u0026ndash;12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eG\u0026oacute;recka K, Dorota K, Urszula K (2007) Regeneration and evaluation of androgenetic plants of head cabbage (\u003cem\u003eBrassica Oleracea\u003c/em\u003e var. capitata L). Veg Crop Res Bull 67:5\u0026ndash;15. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.2478/v10032\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2478/v10032\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eG\u0026oacute;recka K, Krzyżanowska D, Kiszczak W, Kowalska U (2009) Plant regeneration from carrot (\u003cem\u003eDaucus carota\u003c/em\u003e L.) anther culture derived embryos. Acta Physiol Plant 31(6):1139\u0026ndash;1145\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eG\u0026oacute;recka K, Krzyżanowska D, Kiszczak W, Kowalska U, Podwyszynska M (2017) Development of embryoids by microspore and anther cultures of red beet (\u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e L. subsp. vulgaris). JCEA 18(1):185\u0026ndash;195. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/18.1.1877185J\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5513/JCEA01/18.1.1877185J\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGupta P, Reddaiah B, Salava H, Upadhyaya P, Tyagi K, Sarma S, Datta S, Malhotra B, Thomas S, Sunkum A, Devulapalli S, Till BJ, Sreelakshmi Y, Sharma R (2017) Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based identification of induced mutations in a doubly mutagenized tomato \u003cem\u003e(Solanum lycopersicum\u003c/em\u003e) population. Plant J 92:495\u0026ndash;508. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13654\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/tpj.13654\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eG\u0026uuml;rel E, G\u0026uuml;rel S (1998) Plant Regeneration from Unfertilized Ovaries of Sugar Beet (\u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e L.) Cultured In Vitr Tr. J Bot 22:233\u0026ndash;238\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eG\u0026uuml;rel S, G\u0026uuml;rel E, Kaya Z (2000) Doubled haploid production from unpollinated ovules of sugar beet (\u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e L). Plant Cell Reprod 19:151\u0026ndash;159. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s002990000248\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s002990000248\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHansen AL, Plever C, Pedersen HC, Keimer B, Andersen SB (1994) Efficient \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e chromosome doubling during \u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e ovule culture. Plant Breed 112:89\u0026ndash;95. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1994.tb00655.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1439-0523.1994.tb00655.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHosemans D, Bossoutrot D (1983) Induction of haploid plants from in vitro culture of unpollinated beet ovules (\u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e L). Z Pflanzenziichtg 91:74\u0026ndash;77\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKeles D, Ozcan C, Pinar H, Ata A, Denli N, Yucel NK, Taskin H, Buyukalaca S (2016) First report of obtaining haploid plants using tissue culture techniques in spinach. HortScience 51(6):742\u0026ndash;749. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.51.6.742\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.21273/HORTSCI.51.6.742\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKelley DR, Salzberg SL (2010) Detection and correction of false segmental duplications caused by genome mis-assembly. Genom Biol 11:R28. https://doi.org/10.1186%2Fgb-2010-11-3-r28\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKirikovich SS, Svirshchevskaya AM, Levites EV (2003) Variation at isozyme locet al. seed offspring of\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003esugar beet gynogenetic lines Sugar Tech 5(4):289\u0026ndash;292. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02942487\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/BF02942487\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKlimek-Chodacka M, Baranski R (2013) Comparison of haploid and doubled haploid sugar beet clones in their ability to micropropagate and regenerate. Electron J Biotechn 16(2)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.2225/vol16-issue2-fulltext-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2225/vol16-issue2-fulltext-3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKiszczak W, Krzyżanowska D, Strycharczuk K, Kowalska U, Wolko B, G\u0026oacute;recka K (2011) Determination of ploidy and homozygosity of carrot plants obtained from anther cultures. Acta Physiol Plant 33(2):401\u0026ndash;407. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-010-0559-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11738-010-0559-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKiszczak W, Kowalska U, Kapuścińska A, Burian M, G\u0026oacute;recka K (2015) Effect of low temperature on in vitro androgenesis of carrot (\u003cem\u003eDaucus carota\u003c/em\u003e L). Vitro Cell Dev Biol \u0026mdash; Plant 51(2):135\u0026ndash;142. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-015-9665-1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11627-015-9665-1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKiszczak W, Kowalska U, Burian M, G\u0026oacute;recka K (2018) Induced androgenesis as a biotechnology method for obtaining DH plants in \u003cem\u003eDaucus carota\u003c/em\u003e L. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 93(6):625\u0026ndash;633\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2018.1431058\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/14620316.2018.1431058\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKumar S, Banks TW, Cloutier S (2012) SNP Discovery through Next-Generation Sequencing and its applications. Int J Plant Genomics 1\u0026ndash;15. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/831460\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1155/2012/831460\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47(260):583\u0026ndash;621\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLevites EV, Svirshchevskaya AM, Kirikovichi SS, Mil'ko LV (2005) Variation at isozyme locet al. cultured in vitro sugar beet regenerants of gynogenetic origin. Sug Tech 7(1):71\u0026ndash;75. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942487\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/BF02942487\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLinsmaier EM, Skoog F (1965) Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 18:100\u0026ndash;128\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLudina RS, Levites EV (2003) Subcellular localization of isozymes of NAD-dependent malate dehydrogenase in sugar beet \u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e L. Genetik 44(12):1638\u0026ndash;1643\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLukaszewska E, Virden R, Sliwinska E (2011) Hormonal control of endoreduplication in sugar beet (\u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e L.) seedlings growing \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e. Plant Biol 14:216\u0026ndash;222. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00477.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00477.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eO'Malley RC, Barragan CC, Ecker JR (2017) A User\u0026rsquo;s guide to the arabidopsis T-DNA insertional mutant collections. Methods Mol Biol 1284:323\u0026ndash;342. https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-1-4939-2444-8_16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMaraschin SF, de Priester W, Spaink HP, Wang M (2005) Androgenic switch: an example of plant embryogenesis from the male gametophyte perspective. J Exp Bot 56:1711\u0026ndash;1726. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri190\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/jxb/eri190\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMetwally EI, Moustafa SA, El-Sawy BI, Haroun SA, Shalaby TA (1998) Production of haploid plants from in vitro culture of unpollinated ovules of \u003cem\u003eCucurbita\u003c/em\u003e pepo. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 52(3):117\u0026ndash;121. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005948809825\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1023/A:1005948809825\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMurashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioasseys with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473\u0026ndash;497\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMurovec J, Bohanec B (2012) Haploids and doubled haploids in plant breeding biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology. In: Ibrokhim Y (ed) Plant Breed 5:1\u0026ndash;21. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://doi.org/10.5772/29982\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5772/29982\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNagl N, Mezei S, Kovačev L, Vasić D, Čačić N (2004) Induction and micropropagation potential of sugar beet haploids. Genetik 36(3):187\u0026ndash;194. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.2298/GENSR0403187N\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2298/GENSR0403187N\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNielsen R, Paul JS, Albrechtsen A, Song YS (2011) Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. Nat Rev Genet 12(6):443\u0026ndash;451. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2986\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/nrg2986\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNitsch JP, Nitsch C (1969) Haploid plants from pollen grains. Sci 163:85\u0026ndash;87. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.163.3862.85\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1126/science.163.3862.85\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePassricha N, Saifi S, Khatodia S, Tuteja N (2016) Assessing zygosity in progeny of transgenic plants: current methods and perspectives. J Biol Methods 3/3:1\u0026ndash;13. https://doi.org/e4610.14440/jbm.2016.114\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePazuki A, Aflaki F, G\u0026uuml;rel E, Erg\u0026uuml;l A (2017) Gynogenesis induction in sugar beet (\u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e) Improved by 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP) and synergized with cold pretreatment. Sugar Tech, pp 1\u0026ndash;9. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12355-017-0522-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s12355-017-0522-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRies D, Holtgr\u0026auml;we D, Vieh\u0026ouml;ver P, Weisshaar B (2016) Rapid gene identification in sugar beet\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eusing deep sequencing of DNA from phenotypic pools selected from breeding panels. BMC Genomics, 17:236. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2566-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12864-016-2566-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRekha HR, Rakhi C (2013) Establishment of dedifferentiated callus of haploid origin from unfertilized ovaries of tea (\u003cem\u003eCamellia sinensis\u003c/em\u003e (L.) O. Kuntze) as a potential source of total phenolics and antioxidant activity. Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 49:60\u0026ndash;69. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-013-9490-1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11627-013-9490-1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRogozińska JH, Gośka M (1982) Attempts to induce haploids in anther cultures of sugar, fodder and wild-species of beet. Acta Soc Bot Pol 51(1):91\u0026ndash;105. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.1982.009\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5586/asbp.1982.009\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSabir A, Newbury HJ, Todd G, Catty J, Ford-Lloyd BV (1992) Determination of genetic stability using isozymes and RFLPs in beet plants regenerated in vitro. Theor Appl Genet 84:113\u0026ndash;117. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf00223989\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/bf00223989\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSegui-Simarro JM, Nuez F (2008) How microspores transform into haploid embryos: changes associated with embryogenesis induction and microspore derived embryogenesis. Physiol Plant 134:1\u0026ndash;12. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01113.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01113.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSalvi ND, George LY, Eapen S (2002) Micropropagation and field evaluation of micropropagated plants of tumeric. PCTOC 68:143\u0026ndash;151. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013889119887\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1023/A:1013889119887\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSelander RK, Smith MH, Yang SY, Johnson WE, Gentry JB (1971) Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. Variation in the old-field mouse (\u003cem\u003ePeromyscus polionotus\u003c/em\u003e). UT Pub Genet 7103:49\u0026ndash;90\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSong HJ, Lee JM, Graf L, Rho M, Qiu H, Bhattacharya D, Yoon HS (2016) A novice\u0026rsquo;s guide to analyzing NGS-derived organelle and metagenome data. Algae 31(2):137\u0026ndash;154. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2016.31.6.5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.4490/algae.2016.31.6.5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSvirshchevskaya A, Dolezel J (2001) Karyological characterization of sugar beet gynogenetic lines cultured in vitro. J Appl Genet 42/1:21\u0026ndash;32\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSzklarczyk M (2016) The search for mitochondrial polymorphisms differentiating cytoplasmic male-sterile and male-fertile beets. Scien J Agr Univ Hugo Kołłątaj Krakow 408:1\u0026ndash;108\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSzkutnik T (2010) Apomixis In The Sugar Beet Reproduction System. Acta Biol Cracov Ser Bot 52(2):87\u0026ndash;96. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.2478/v10182-010-0011-y\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2478/v10182-010-0011-y\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTomaszewska-Sowa M (2010) Cytometric analyses of sugar beet (\u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e l.) Plants regenerated from unfertilized ovules cultured \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e. EJPAU 13/4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTyukavin GB, Shmykova NA, Mankhova MA (1999) Cytological study of embryogenesis in cultured carrot anthers. Russ J Plant Physl 46(6):876\u0026ndash;884\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang B, Tseng E, Regulski M, Clark TA, Hon T, Jiao Y, Lu Z, Olson A, Stein JC, Ware D (2016) Unveiling the complexity of the maize transcriptome by single-molecule long-read sequencing. Nat Commun 7(11708):1\u0026ndash;12. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11708\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/ncomms11708\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWeeden FN, Gottlieb LD (1980) Isolation of cytoplasmic enzymes from pollen. Plant Physiol 66:400\u0026ndash;403\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWeich EW, Levall MW (2003) Doubled haploid production of sugar beet (\u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e L). In: Maluszynski M, Kasha KJ, Forster BP, Szarejko I (eds) Doubled haploid production in crop plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 255\u0026ndash;263. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1293-4_38\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-94-017-1293-4_38\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWestphal L, Wricke G (1989) Genetic analysis of DIA, GOT and PGI isozyme loci in Daucus carota L. ssp. sativus. Plan Breed 102:51\u0026ndash;57\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWędzony M, Forster BP, Zur I, Golemiec E, Szechyńska-Hebda M, Dubas E, Gotębiowska G (2009) Progress in doubled haploid technology in higher plants. In: Touraev A, Forster BP, Jain SM (eds) Advances in Haploid Production in Higher Plants. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1\u0026ndash;14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWremerth-Weich E, Levall M (2003) Doubled haploid production of sugar beet (\u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e L). In: Maluszynski M, Kasha KJ, Forster BP, Szarejko I (eds) Doubled Haploid Production in Crop Plants \u0026ndash; A Manual. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp 255\u0026ndash;265\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVan Geyt J, Speckmann GJ Jr, D\u0026rsquo;Halluin K, Jacobs M (1987) \u003cem\u003eIn vitro\u003c/em\u003e induction of haploid plants from unpollinated ovules and ovaries of the sugarbeet (\u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e L). Theor Appl Genet 73:920\u0026ndash;925. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf00289399\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/bf00289399\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZheng K (1999) Effect of 2,4D-dichlorofenoxyacetic acid on callus induction and plant regeneration in anther culture of wheat (\u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e L). Plant Cell Rep 19(1):69\u0026ndash;73\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhuzhzhalova TP, Podvigina OA, Znamenskaya VV, Vasil\u0026rsquo;chenko EN, Karpechenko NA, Zemlyanukhina OA (2016) Sugar beet (\u003cem\u003eBeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e L.) haploid parthenogenesis in vitro: factors and diagnostic characters. Agricultural Biol 51(5):636\u0026ndash;644. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2016.5.636eng\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.15389/agrobiology.2016.5.636eng\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Tables","content":"\u003cp\u003eTable 1. The influence of the genotype on the gynogenesis induction in ovule \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e culture of red beet, \u0026nbsp;different media.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGenotype\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.286396181384248%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNumber of cultured ovules\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNumber of obtained ELS\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.525059665871122%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNumber of responding ovules\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.43436754176611%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNumber of\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eELS per 100 ovules\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRA-10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.286396181384248%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e48\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.525059665871122%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.43436754176611%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.1b*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRA-11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.286396181384248%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e48\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.525059665871122%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.43436754176611%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.1b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRA-12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.286396181384248%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e48\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.525059665871122%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.43436754176611%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.1b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRA-13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.286396181384248%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.525059665871122%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.43436754176611%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRA-14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.286396181384248%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.525059665871122%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.43436754176611%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e406\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.286396181384248%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e96\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.525059665871122%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.43436754176611%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e411\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.286396181384248%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.525059665871122%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.43436754176611%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e58.3a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eOpolski\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.286396181384248%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e216\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.37708830548926%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.525059665871122%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.43436754176611%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.9b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003eCombinations located in the same homogeneous group (with the same letter) do not differ statistically at a significance level of\u0026nbsp;\u0026alpha;\u0026nbsp;= 0.05. Kruskal-Wallis test.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 2. Effect of the medium on the gynogenesis efficiency in ovule cultures of red beet Opolski cultivar\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.377672209026127%\" rowspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMedium\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"78.62232779097387%\" colspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNumber\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"24.242424242424242%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ecultured\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eovules\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"34.24242424242424%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; ELS\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"41.515151515151516%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eELS per\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100 plated ovules\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.428571428571427%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB\u003csub\u003e5\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sub\u003e+\u003csub\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sub\u003e2,4D\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.047619047619047%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e80\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.904761904761905%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.61904761904762%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.5a*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.428571428571427%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB\u003csub\u003e5\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sub\u003e+ BA, IAA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.047619047619047%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e216\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.904761904761905%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.61904761904762%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.9a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.428571428571427%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN\u003csub\u003e6\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sub\u003e+ 2,4D\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.047619047619047%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e128\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.904761904761905%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.61904761904762%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.6a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.428571428571427%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN\u003csub\u003e6\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sub\u003e+ BA, IAA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.047619047619047%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.904761904761905%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.61904761904762%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.0a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003eCombinations located in the same homogeneous group (with the same letter) do not differ statistically at a significance level of\u0026nbsp;\u0026alpha;\u0026nbsp;= 0.05. Kruskal-Wallis test.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 3. The effect of three sucrose concentrations (10,20,30 \u0026nbsp;g l\u003csup\u003e-3\u003c/sup\u003e) in three media (MS, N6 B5) on the \u0026nbsp;regeneration of shoots from ELS formed by gynogenesis in red beet \u0026bdquo;Opolski\u0026rdquo; cultivar.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"510\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"23.137254901960784%\" rowspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003emedium/sucrose concentration g\u0026nbsp;l\u003csup\u003e-3\u003c/sup\u003e \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.686274509803921%\" rowspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNumber of cultures\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eELS\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"53.72549019607843%\" colspan=\"4\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Multiplication - \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;the average\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eper 1 embryo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.450980392156863%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"75.64102564102564%\" colspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eShoots\u0026nbsp;without root\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"24.358974358974358%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCallus\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.243589743589745%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;long more\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ethan 0.5 cm\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.243589743589745%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003elong\u0026nbsp;less\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ethan 0.5 cm\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.153846153846153%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003etotal number\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"24.358974358974358%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"23.137254901960784%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMS-10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.686274509803921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e62\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;0.40b*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;0.83b*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.941176470588236%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;1.23b*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.901960784313726%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;2.78ab*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"23.137254901960784%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMS-20\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.686274509803921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e58\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.30b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.88b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.941176470588236%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 1.18b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.901960784313726%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;2.89a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"23.137254901960784%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMS-30\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.686274509803921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e61\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.77a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.11a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.941176470588236%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.88a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.901960784313726%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;2.56ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"23.137254901960784%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.686274509803921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.941176470588236%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.901960784313726%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"23.137254901960784%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN6-10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.686274509803921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e60\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.22b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;0.11bc\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.941176470588236%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;0.33cd\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.901960784313726%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;1.11b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"23.137254901960784%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN6-20\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.686274509803921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e63\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.11b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.78b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.941176470588236%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;0.89bc\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.901960784313726%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;1.44b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"23.137254901960784%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN6-30\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.686274509803921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e59\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.00b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.00c\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.941176470588236%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.00d\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.901960784313726%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;2.00ab\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"23.137254901960784%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.686274509803921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.941176470588236%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.901960784313726%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"23.137254901960784%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB5-10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.686274509803921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e61\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.00b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.00c\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.941176470588236%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.00d\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.901960784313726%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;1.00b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"23.137254901960784%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB5-20\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.686274509803921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e58\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.00b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.00c\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.941176470588236%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.00d\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.901960784313726%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;1.00b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"23.137254901960784%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB5-30\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.686274509803921%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e58\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.00b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.00c\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.941176470588236%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.00d\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.901960784313726%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;1.00b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"23.137254901960784%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.686274509803921%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.666666666666668%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.941176470588236%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.450980392156863%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.450980392156863%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003eCombinations located in the same homogeneous group (with the same letter) do not differ statistically at a significance level of \u0026alpha; = 0.05. Kruskal-Wallis test.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 4. The effect of PGR (BA 0.2 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e, IAA 1 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e , NAA 1 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e) on the number of obtained regenerants from gynogenetic embryos of red beet on MS medium (breading line 411) \u0026ndash; the average per 1 embryo.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.511627906976745%\" rowspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMedium\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.86046511627907%\" rowspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNumber of cultures\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eELS\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"61.627906976744185%\" colspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Frequency of plant regeneration\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"60.75471698113208%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eShoots\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.24528301886792%\" rowspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWithout regeneration\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"40.993788819875775%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ewith root\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"59.006211180124225%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ewithout root\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.511627906976745%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBA, IAA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.86046511627907%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e63\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.348837209302326%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;0,25a\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.093023255813954%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;1,31a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"24.186046511627907%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0,02a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.511627906976745%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBA, NAA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.86046511627907%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e51\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.348837209302326%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0,04b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.093023255813954%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;1,68a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"24.186046511627907%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0,06a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003eCombinations located in the same homogeneous group (with the same letter) do not differ statistically at a significance level of\u0026nbsp;\u0026alpha;\u0026nbsp;= 0.05. Kruskal-Wallis test.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 5. Ploidy evaluation of gynogenetic plant material conducted during the multiplication of red beet plants.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"31.80722891566265%\" rowspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGenotype\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.662650602409638%\" rowspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNumber of rosettes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"52.53012048192771%\" colspan=\"4\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePloidy\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"51.37614678899082%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1x\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"48.62385321100918%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2x\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"25.229357798165136%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003enumber\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.146788990825687%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.146788990825687%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003enumber\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.477064220183486%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"31.80722891566265%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eOpolski\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.662650602409638%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.25301204819277%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.734939759036145%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.734939759036145%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; 0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.80722891566265%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"31.80722891566265%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e411\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.662650602409638%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.25301204819277%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.734939759036145%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.734939759036145%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; 0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.80722891566265%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"31.80722891566265%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRA 5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.662650602409638%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.25301204819277%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.734939759036145%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.734939759036145%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.80722891566265%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; 100\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"31.80722891566265%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5/11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.662650602409638%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; 2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.25301204819277%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.734939759036145%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.734939759036145%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; 0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.80722891566265%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 6. \u0026nbsp;The number of transcripts, on which the sequence reads were mapped for the tested red beet breeding line no 411. The total number of reference transcripts: 29.088\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.202334630350194%\" rowspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePlant indywiduals\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"85.7976653696498%\" colspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe number of reads mapped on transcripts\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"38.86363636363637%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"38.86363636363637%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.272727272727273%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;100\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.230019493177387%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e399\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.333333333333336%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23.310\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.333333333333336%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.644\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.103313840155945%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.291\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.230019493177387%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e426\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.333333333333336%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24.930\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.333333333333336%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.532\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.103313840155945%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17.703\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.230019493177387%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e521\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.333333333333336%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e25.128\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.333333333333336%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.853\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.103313840155945%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18.148\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 7. The number and the character (heterozygosity/homozygosity) of the discovered sequence variants observed in the transcriptome of three plants \u0026nbsp;line no 411 of red beet at various limits of the number of single sequence reads in the place of the occurance of tested variant.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.756944444444445%\" rowspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePlant indywiduals\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"85.24305555555556%\" colspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe number of all nucleotide/nucleotides reads including the variant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.53658536585366%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"34.959349593495936%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;20\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"31.504065040650406%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;200\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.731369150779896%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"28.596187175043326%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ehetero*/in total\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"29.80935875216638%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ehetero*/in total\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.863084922010398%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ehetero*/in total\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.731369150779896%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e399\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"28.596187175043326%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.392/88.306\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"29.80935875216638%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.747/45.483\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.863084922010398%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e330/4.377\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.731369150779896%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e426\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"28.596187175043326%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18.333 /163.238\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"29.80935875216638%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.870/111.444\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.863084922010398%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e701/17.318\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.731369150779896%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e521\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"28.596187175043326%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18.750 /172.710\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"29.80935875216638%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.446/113.927\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.863084922010398%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e985/13.836\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e* NOTE: the numbers presented in the table as a \u0026bdquo;hetero\u0026rdquo; are reffering to the nuber of possible variants. The amount of places of their occurance in the analyzed transcripts of red beet was at least two times lower.\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"gynogenesis, cytometry, isoenzymes, next generation sequencing","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4841972/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4841972/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eConditions of \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e gynogenesis process in red beet was examined. A significant influence of the genotype on the gynogenesis process was demonstrated. Of the eight genotypes, 58.3% planted ovules regenerated embryo-like structures in breeding line 411, 2.1% in RA-10, RA-11, RA-12 breeding lines and 0.9% embryo-like structures in \u0026lsquo;Opolski\u0026rsquo;. For the gynogenesis induction, B5 medium containing 0.1 mgl\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid was the most effective from all tested media. On this medium, the highest number of gynogenetic embryo-like structures was obtained. Most of the plants were regenerated on MS medium supplemented with 30 g l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e sucrose, 0.2 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e 6-benzylaminopurine and 1 mg l\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e indole-3-acetic acid. Thirty nine percent of the regenerated plants acclimatized. Cytometric evaluation of the gynogenetic plants of four tested genotypes revealed that in three genotypes, 100% of tested plants were haploid. Plants showed diploid ploidy level in one genotype. Isoenzymatic analysis of gynogenetic plants demonstrated that 95% and 70% of examined populations were homozygotic for the phosphohexose isomerase isoenzyme and the aspartato aminotransferase isoenzyme, respectively. During the next generation sequencing, 93% of reads were successfully mapped, from which 83\u0026ndash;85% were mapped in pairs. For 15% of pairs it was clear that the obtained sequence was fully homozygous, the rest of the readings were not unambiguous, but similar to the sequence of a homozygous base pair system.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Dihaploid plant production of red beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris), homozygosity evaluation using isoenzymatic and NGS methods","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-09-20 09:32:55","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4841972/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"8a981475-2d98-4a56-a4b3-2124a895e770","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 20th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-04-28T06:04:52+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-09-20 09:32:55","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4841972","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4841972","identity":"rs-4841972","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}