Efficacy and safety of second-line treatment in Thai patients with primary warm-type autoimmune hemolytic anemia

In: Hematology · 2019 · vol. 24(1) , pp. 720–726 · doi:10.1080/16078454.2019.1671060 · PMID:31581907 · W2978322355
article OA: gold CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11

This study examined the efficacy and safety of second-line immunosuppressive drug treatment for primary warm-type autoimmune hemolytic anemia in Thai patients, noting a common relapse rate.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Immunosuppressive drugs are the most common second-line treatment for primary warm-type AIHA in Thailand; however, relapse was common. Additional therapies are needed to reduce the relapse rate and prolong remission.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (39)

SciLite annotations

chemicals 9
corticosteroid corticosteroid steroid steroid azathioprine cyclophosphamide chlorambucil danazol rituximab

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-10T10:25:40.298144+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-05-18T04:26:01.642840+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK