Gamifying Engagement in Spatial Crowdsourcing: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study on Gamification Impact among University Students

Citizen Science now relies heavily on digital platforms to engage the public in environmental data collection. Yet, many projects face declining participation over time. This study examines the effect of three gamification elements—points, daily streaks, and real-time leaderboards—on student engagement, achievement, and immersion during a five-day campus-wide intervention utilising the GAME engine and a spatial crowdsourcing app. Employing a convergent mixed-methods design, we combined behavioural log analysis, validated psychometric scales (GAMEFULQUEST), and post-experiment interviews to triangulate both quantitative and qualitative dimensions of engagement. Results reveal that gamified elements enhanced students’ sense of accomplishment and early-stage motivation, which is reflected in significantly higher average scores for goal-directed engagement and recurring qualitative themes related to competence and recognition. However, deeper immersion and sustained “flow” were less robust with repetitive task design. While the intervention achieved only moderate long-term participation rates, it demonstrates that thoughtfully implemented game mechanics can meaningfully enhance engagement without undermining data quality. These findings provide actionable guidance for designing more adaptive, motivating, and inclusive Citizen Science solutions, underscoring the importance of mixed-methods evaluation in understanding complex engagement processes. While the sample size limits statistical generalizability, the study serves as an exploratory field trial offering valuable design insights and methodological guidance for future large-scale, controlled Citizen Science interventions.