Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895" }, "headline": "Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation with Limbic System Radiation Doses in...", "datePublished": "2025-09-10T15:14:49", "dateModified": "2025-09-10T15:14:49", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Prerana Baruah" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Athiyamaan MS" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Sourjya Banerjee" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Johan Sunny" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Paul Simon" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Muralidhar Pai" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Mayur Kamath" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Arjun Shetty" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Challapalli Srinivas" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Dilson Lobo" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Sahana Srinivasan" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Pooja Prakash" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Abinesh E" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Abhishek Krishna" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": " Background Radiation therapy (RT) for central nervous system (CNS) malignancies can result in neurocognitive decline, affecting quality of life. While hippocampal-sparing approaches are well documented, limited data exist on the impact of radiation dose to other cognitive structures. This prospective study evaluates domain-specific cognitive changes following RT and explores correlations with radiation dose to key brain regions. Methodology Twenty-five patients with primary CNS tumours undergoing focal radiotherapy, with or without concurrent chemotherapy, were enrolled. Neurocognitive function was assessed using the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III) tool, pre- and six months post-treatment. Radiation dose-volume histogram (DVH) data were analyzed for structures including the hippocampus, amygdala, cerebellum, and corpus callosum. Patients were stratified based on ACE-III score decline (≥3 points vs. <3 points), and dose-response correlations were examined. Results A statistically significant decline in mean ACE-III scores was observed post-treatment (pre: 89.48 ± 6.84 vs. post: 87.91 ± 6.29, p = 0.007). Attention, language, and fluency were the most affected domains. Patients with cognitive decline received higher radiation doses to all examined structures, with the corpus callosum showing the strongest association (mean dose in decline group: 35.91 Gy vs. 30.70 Gy; p = 0.440). However, no dose-response relationship reached statistical significance. Conclusion This study highlights early, domain-specific neurocognitive decline following focal RT for CNS tumours, with attention and language being most vulnerable. Corpus callosum dose emerged as a key correlate. These findings suggest the need to broaden neuroprotection strategies beyond the hippocampus and emphasize the value of incorporating routine neurocognitive assessment. " } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895/v1", "name": "Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation..." } } ] } Home Browse Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Baruah P, MS A, Banerjee S et al. Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation with Limbic System Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Central Nervous System Tumours: A preliminary report [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :895 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.166763.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Research Article Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation with Limbic System Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Central Nervous System Tumours: A preliminary report [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] Prerana Baruah 1 , Athiyamaan MS https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4691-9728 1 , Sourjya Banerjee 1 , [...] Johan Sunny 1 , Paul Simon 1 , Muralidhar Pai 2 , Mayur Kamath 2 , Arjun Shetty 2 , Challapalli Srinivas 1 , Dilson Lobo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9222-863X 1 , Sahana Srinivasan 1 , Pooja Prakash 1 , Abinesh E 1 , Abhishek Krishna https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9318-7024 1 Prerana Baruah 1 , Athiyamaan MS https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4691-9728 1 , [...] Sourjya Banerjee 1 , Johan Sunny 1 , Paul Simon 1 , Muralidhar Pai 2 , Mayur Kamath 2 , Arjun Shetty 2 , Challapalli Srinivas 1 , Dilson Lobo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9222-863X 1 , Sahana Srinivasan 1 , Pooja Prakash 1 , Abinesh E 1 , Abhishek Krishna https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9318-7024 1 PUBLISHED 10 Sep 2025 Author details Author details 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, Manipal, India 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, Manipal, India Prerana Baruah Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Athiyamaan MS Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing Sourjya Banerjee Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing Johan Sunny Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Resources, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing Paul Simon Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing Muralidhar Pai Roles: Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Visualization Mayur Kamath Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Visualization Arjun Shetty Roles: Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources Challapalli Srinivas Roles: Data Curation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing Dilson Lobo Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing Sahana Srinivasan Roles: Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing Pooja Prakash Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing Abinesh E Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing Abhishek Krishna Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS This article is included in the Oncology gateway. This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway. Abstract Background Radiation therapy (RT) for central nervous system (CNS) malignancies can result in neurocognitive decline, affecting quality of life. While hippocampal-sparing approaches are well documented, limited data exist on the impact of radiation dose to other cognitive structures. This prospective study evaluates domain-specific cognitive changes following RT and explores correlations with radiation dose to key brain regions. Methodology Twenty-five patients with primary CNS tumours undergoing focal radiotherapy, with or without concurrent chemotherapy, were enrolled. Neurocognitive function was assessed using the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III) tool, pre- and six months post-treatment. Radiation dose-volume histogram (DVH) data were analyzed for structures including the hippocampus, amygdala, cerebellum, and corpus callosum. Patients were stratified based on ACE-III score decline (≥3 points vs. <3 points), and dose-response correlations were examined. Results A statistically significant decline in mean ACE-III scores was observed post-treatment (pre: 89.48 ± 6.84 vs. post: 87.91 ± 6.29, p = 0.007). Attention, language, and fluency were the most affected domains. Patients with cognitive decline received higher radiation doses to all examined structures, with the corpus callosum showing the strongest association (mean dose in decline group: 35.91 Gy vs. 30.70 Gy; p = 0.440). However, no dose-response relationship reached statistical significance. Conclusion This study highlights early, domain-specific neurocognitive decline following focal RT for CNS tumours, with attention and language being most vulnerable. Corpus callosum dose emerged as a key correlate. These findings suggest the need to broaden neuroprotection strategies beyond the hippocampus and emphasize the value of incorporating routine neurocognitive assessment. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords Cognitive Dysfunction, Brain Neoplasms, Radiotherapy, Cognition, Glioma Corresponding Author(s) Abhishek Krishna ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Abhishek Krishna Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Copyright: © 2025 Baruah P et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Baruah P, MS A, Banerjee S et al. Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation with Limbic System Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Central Nervous System Tumours: A preliminary report [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :895 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.166763.1 ) First published: 10 Sep 2025, 14 :895 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.166763.1 ) Latest published: 10 Sep 2025, 14 :895 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.166763.1 ) Introduction The prevalence of cranial nervous system tumours has increased due to improved diagnosis, treatment protocols, and multimodal treatment approaches. According to GLOBOCAN 2022 data, the global incidence of Central Nervous System (CNS) tumours is approximately 322,000. 1 As per National Cancer Registry Program (NCRP), the Indian data records the incidence of CNS tumours ranging from 5 to 10 cases per 100,000 population, accounting for approximately 2% of all malignancies. 2 The management of gliomas presents a unique challenge, not only due to their aggressive biological behaviour but also because of their profound effects on neurocognitive function. As advancements in neurosurgical techniques, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have improved survival rates, the focus has increasingly shifted toward preserving the quality of life, particularly cognitive function. Neurocognitive impairment is a common finding in glioma patients, impacting functions such as memory, executive function, attention, and language function 3 , 4 While surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are the mainstay modalities of treatment, the effect of these modalities on neurocognitive function is a significant area of research. Specifically, radiation therapy has been associated with cognitive impairment, most probably because of radiation-induced damage to critical cognitive and limbic system structures of the brain such as the hippocampus, corpus callosum, and amygdala 5 , 6 New radiation techniques such as volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) have been developed to better localize the tumour with less exposure to normal neural tissue, potentially reducing neurocognitive toxic effects. 7 The neurocognitive effects of radiation are multifactorial, involving direct damage to neurons, vascular damage, and neuroinflammation. The extent of cognitive impairment depends on factors like tumour location, radiation dose, fractionation schedules, and patient-specific vulnerability. 6 , 8 Previous studies have highlighted the importance of assessing cognitive outcomes following radiotherapy using standardized neurocognitive tests. 9 , 10 The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Assessment (ACA) Scale is one such validated instrument for assessing various cognitive domains, including memory, attention, fluency, language, and visuospatial processing, and is a valuable instrument for glioma patients undergoing radiotherapy. 11 Several studies have previously considered neurocognitive outcomes after surgery and radiotherapy for glioma patients. 6 , 12 Talacchi et al. described that tumour resection by itself can be associated with cognitive change, irrespective of adjuvant treatments. Although the influence of the dose of radiation on the remaining limbic structures and the cerebellum is underrepresented in the literature, hippocampal dose constraint studies have proved that lowering the dose of radiation to the hippocampus can spare cognition, reaffirming the position of accurate radiation planning. 5 The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation of dose delivered to the critical limbic system structures—hypothalamus, corpus callosum, amygdala—and anterior and posterior cerebellum, and resulting neurocognitive change measured by the ACE Scale. Methodology This prospective observational study was conducted to assess early neurocognitive changes in patients with primary central nervous system (CNS) tumours receiving radiation therapy and to evaluate the correlation between cognitive outcomes and radiation dose to specific brain substructures involved in cognition. The study received approval from the institutional ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to start of the study. Adult patients (≥18 years) with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed gliomas of WHO Grade II to IV were included. Eligibility criteria required a Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) of seventy or above. Patients were excluded if they had prior cranial radiotherapy, pre-existing cognitive impairment, neurodegenerative disorders, psychiatric illness affecting cognition, history of traumatic brain injury, or other neurological conditions known to affect cognitive function. Recurrent or residual tumours from prior treatments were also excluded. Demographic and clinical data were collected at baseline, including age, sex, socioeconomic indicators. Tumour-related data included anatomical location, laterality, WHO grade, histological subtype, and molecular markers. Extent of surgical resection was categorized as biopsy, subtotal resection, or gross total resection. Cognitive assessment protocol Neurocognitive function was assessed using the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III), which evaluates five domains: attention/orientation (18 points), memory (26 points), verbal fluency (14 points), language (26 points), and visuospatial abilities (16 points), with a total score range of 0–100. 11 Cognitive assessments were performed prior to radiation therapy, at six months, 1 year and 2 years post radiation therapy. This preliminary analysis reports findings from the baseline and 6-month assessments. All assessments were conducted in person by trained clinical staff in the outpatient setting. Tests were administered in the participant’s preferred language. Where needed, trained interpreters were involved to facilitate communication. Each domain score and the total score were recorded. A total ACE-III scores above 87 was categorized as normal cognition, 83–87 as inconclusive, and below 83 as impaired. Treatment details Patients were planned for external beam radiation therapy using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Surgical intervention included either biopsy or maximum safe resection, based on the tumour location and feasibility. Radiotherapy was administered in the adjuvant setting for all patients. Radiation was delivered to a dose of 54 to 60 Gy in 1.8–2.0 Gy fractions depending on tumour characteristics and patient clinical status. Treatment planning included immobilization with thermoplastic masks and acquisition of planning computed tomography (CT) images with 3 mm slice thickness. Neurocognitive assessments were done post-surgery and prior to radiation therapy in all patients, and these were considered as the post-surgical baseline values. Planning Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences were co-registered with the CT for accurate target and organ-at-risk (OAR) delineation. The gross tumour volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), and planning target volume (PTV) were defined according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines. 13 , 14 In addition to standard OARs, specific neurocognitive structures were contoured, including the bilateral hippocampi, corpus callosum, amygdalae, and anterior and posterior cerebellum using European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN) guidelines. 15 Treatment plans were generated and reviewed by a team consisting of radiation oncologists and medical physicists. Radiation dose distributions were recorded for subsequent analysis. Chemotherapy was administered based on tumour histology and standard clinical guidelines. Patients with glioblastoma or anaplastic gliomas received concurrent temozolomide (75 mg/m 2 /day) during radiotherapy, followed by adjuvant temozolomide in 28-day cycles. Patients with 1p/19q codeleted oligodendrogliomas received procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy as indicated. If patients did not tolerate PCV, Temozolomide was administered. Chemotherapy data, including regimen and number of cycles, were documented for each participant. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) data were used to extract radiation dose metrics for the hippocampi, corpus callosum, amygdalae, anterior cerebellum, and posterior cerebellum. For each structure, the minimum (Dmin), maximum (Dmax), and mean (Dmean) radiation doses were recorded. In cases where only one hippocampus was spared due to tumour involvement on one side, only the contralateral side was used for analysis. These values were collected and organized for groupwise comparison. Participants were stratified into two groups based on change in total ACE-III score between baseline and follow-up. Group A included patients with a decline of ≥3 points, while Group B included patients with a decline of <3 points or no change. The threshold of three points was selected based on literature indicating that such a change is clinically relevant in ACE-III performance. Statistical analysis All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 27). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed data, and as median and interquartile range (IQR) for non-normally distributed data. Categorical variables were reported as absolute frequencies and percentages. Assess whether the distribution of continuous variables followed a normal distribution, the Shapiro–Wilk test was applied. Based on the outcome of the normality test, appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests were selected for subsequent comparisons. The primary outcome variable was the change in total Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III) score from post-surgery baseline to six months post-radiotherapy. Paired sample t-tests were used to compare post-surgery and post-radiation ACE-III total and domain-specific scores for normally distributed data. For non-normally distributed score data, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used as a non-parametric alternative. For subgroup analysis, patients were stratified into two groups based on change in total ACE-III score - Group A: Patients with a decline of ≥3 points and Group B: Patients with a decline of <3 points or no change. Between-group, comparisons of radiation dose metrics to each of the contoured brain substructures were conducted using independent samples t-tests for normally distributed data and the Mann–Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data. To evaluate associations between radiation dose and change in cognitive scores as continuous variables, correlation analyses were performed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient for normally distributed variables and Spearman’s rank-order correlation for non-normally distributed variables. Correlation strength was interpreted using standard thresholds (e.g., 0.1–0.3 = weak, 0.3–0.5 = moderate, >0.5 = strong). For all hypothesis testing, a two-sided p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Where appropriate, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and reported to quantify the precision of effect size estimates. Data completeness was monitored throughout the study. Cases with missing post-treatment ACE-III data (due to death, dropout, or loss to follow-up) were excluded from paired statistical analyses but included in baseline descriptive summaries. No imputation was performed for missing values. Results Patient characteristics A total of twenty-five patients with histologically confirmed primary central nervous system tumours were included in the study. The median age at diagnosis was 42 years. The initial symptoms varied, though headache emerged as the most reported complaint, affecting ten patients (40%) followed by limb weakness (36%), giddiness (12%), seizures (8%), and altered sensorium (8%. Comorbidities were present in eight patients (32%). Among these, diabetes mellitus and deep vein thrombosis were most frequently observed. In terms of histopathology, astrocytomas were the most diagnosed tumours, found in eleven patients (44%). Glioblastomas were seen in eight cases (32%), while six patients (24%) had oligodendrogliomas. The frontal lobe was the most frequently involved anatomical site (24%), followed by the temporal lobe (16%), parietal region (12%), frontoparietal area (12%), and the insular cortex (12%). Multifocal disease was observed in one patient presenting with a tumour in the cerebellopontine angle. Grading according to the WHO classification showed that 44% (n = 11) of tumours were Grade 4, 32% (n = 8) were Grade 2, and 24% (n = 6) were Grade 3. IDH mutation analysis was available for fifteen patients; of these, 7 (28%) tested positive for the mutation, while 3 (12%) were classified as wild type. Radiation dose delivered ranged from 54 Gy to 60 Gy. The details of the patient characteristics are outlined in Table 1 . Table 1. Patient characteristics. Characteristic Detail n (%) Age (years) Median 42 Gender Male 17 (68%) Female 8 (32%) Presenting Complaint Headache 10 (40%) Motor weakness 9 (36%) Giddiness 3 (12%) Seizures 2 (8%) Altered sensorium 2 (8%) Histology Astrocytoma 11 (44%) Glioblastoma 8 (32%) Oligodendroglioma 6 (24%) Tumour Grade Grade II 8 (32%) Grade III 6 (24%) Grade IV 11 (44%) Radiation Dose 54 Gy 8 (32%) 60 Gy 17 (68%) Temozolomide Concurrent & Adjuvant 20 (80%) No 5 (20%) Neurocognitive assessments The ACE-III assessed five cognitive domains: memory, attention, verbal fluency, language, and visuospatial abilities. The mean post-surgery baseline ACE-III total score was 89.48 ± 6.48 (median: 92; 86–94). Based on pre-defined thresholds, 72% (n = 18) of patients demonstrated normal cognition (score >87), 12% (n = 3) had inconclusive scores (83–87), and 16% (n = 4) scored in the impaired range (<83). At six months, the mean post-treatment ACE-III total score was 87.91 ± 6.29 (median: 89; 85–92, p = 0.57). Following treatment, 60% (n = 15) had scores in the normal range, 4% (n = 1) in the inconclusive range, and 16% (n = 4) in the impaired range. A ≥3-point decline in total ACE-III score was observed in 68% (n = 17) of patients, while 24% (n = 6) showed no meaningful change, and 8% (n = 2) demonstrated improvement. Domain-wise comparisons revealed a statistically significant reduction in attention scores post-treatment (mean: 14.45 ± 2.04 vs 15.16 ± 2.03; p = 0.026). Reductions in language (23.91 ± 1.90 vs 24.20 ± 1.73; p = 0.090) and fluency (12.73 ± 1.70 vs 12.84 ± 1.52; p = 0.104) approached significance. Changes in memory (23.23 ± 1.80 vs 23.56 ± 1.78; p = 0.184) and visuospatial abilities (13.68 ± 1.32 vs 13.80 ± 1.61; p = 0.134) were not statistically significant ( Table 2 ). Table 2. Neurocognitive assessment - Pre (baseline) and 6 months post radiation. Domains N Timing Mean SD Median IQR P value Attention [0/18] 25 Pre-Radiation 15.16 2.03 15 14 17 0.026 Post Radiation 14.45 2.04 15 14 16 Memory [0/26] 25 Pre-Radiation 23.56 1.78 24 22 25 0.184 Post Radiation 23.23 1.80 24 22 25 Fluency [0/14] 25 Pre-Radiation 12.84 1.52 13 13 14 0.104 Post Radiation 12.73 1.70 13 13 14 Language [0/26] 25 Pre-Radiation 24.20 1.73 25 24 25 0.090 Post Radiation 23.91 1.90 25 23 25 Visuospatial abilities [0/16] 25 Pre-Radiation 13.80 1.61 14 14 15 0.134 Post Radiation 13.68 1.32 14 13 15 Total Score 25 Pre-Radiation 89.48 6.84 92 86 94 0.57 Post Radiation 87.91 6.29 89 85 92 Radiation dose to cognitive structures Radiation dose-volume histogram (DVH) data were analyzed for all patients. Among the delineated cognitive-related brain structures, the corpus callosum received the highest mean radiation dose (mean: 34.96 ± 14.56 Gy; median: 38.71 Gy; range: 2.22–59.73 Gy). The amygdala and hippocampus received mean doses of 21.23 ± 13.43 Gy (median: 21.09 Gy; range: 0.84–44.05 Gy) and 19.86 ± 12.20 Gy (median: 17.20 Gy; range: 1.72–50.25 Gy), respectively. The anterior cerebellum received a mean dose of 13.60 ± 12.49 Gy (median: 10.63 Gy; range: 0.50–42.45 Gy), while the posterior cerebellum received the lowest mean dose (9.30 ± 10.59 Gy; median: 5.18 Gy; range: 0.35–37.24 Gy). In the subgroup of 13 patients with bilateral hippocampal contouring (unilateral tumour involvement), the mean hippocampal dose was higher, recorded at 34.07 ± 13.82 Gy (median: 35.87 Gy; range: 4.03–56.38 Gy). The maximum doses in this subgroup reached 63.14 Gy for the hippocampus, 61.33 Gy for the amygdala, and 65.15 Gy for the corpus callosum ( Table 3 ). Table 3. Radiation dose to structures involved in cognition. Structure Dose parameter Mean SD Median IQR Range Percentile 25 Percentile 75 Minimum Maximum Hippocampus D Min 10.13 9.44 7.84 4.46 12.79 0.67 37.57 D Max 32.33 17.29 29.17 21.47 42.53 0.26 63.13 D Mean 19.86 12.20 17.20 12.58 25.18 1.72 50.24 Amygdala D Min 14.60 10.80 11.37 6.46 18.39 0.64 38.53 D Max 29.47 18.70 25.82 17.86 44.12 1.13 61.32 D Mean 21.23 13.43 21.09 12.57 31.73 0.83 44.04 Anterior Cerebellum D Min 3.02 3.97 1.45 0.92 2.52 0.21 17.23 D Max 35.99 21.44 42.04 16.63 55.07 1.72 63.89 D Mean 13.60 12.49 10.63 4.24 19.86 0.50 42.44 Posterior Cerebellum D Min 2.23 2.76 1.31 0.75 2.18 0.16 12.72 D Max 31.33 24.23 24.22 12.71 55.35 0.74 64.89 D Mean 9.30 10.59 5.18 2.11 13.56 0.34 37.24 Corpus Callosum D Min 15.09 12.55 10.79 7.42 19.90 1.04 44.36 D Max 52.29 11.62 55.34 46.77 60.75 12.27 65.14 D Mean 34.96 14.56 38.71 23.88 44.34 2.21 59.72 Range of dose for the structures (hippocampus, corpus callosum, anterior cerebellum, posterior cerebellum, amygdala). Dose–response analysis and cognitive correlation Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on the degree of change in ACE-III score following treatment: Group A (≥3-point decline, n = 15) and Group B (<3-point decline, n = 10). Group A exhibited numerically higher radiation dose exposure across all analyzed brain structures. The hippocampal mean dose was 20.29 ± 16.71 Gy in Group A and 19.86 ± 8.94 Gy in Group B ( p = 0.940). Corresponding maximum hippocampal doses were 33.38 ± 20.59 Gy and 30.38 ± 15.58 Gy, respectively ( p = 0.707). The mean doses to amygdala were 22.23 ± 17.42 Gy in Group A versus 22.10 ± 11.88 Gy in Group B ( p = 0.984). Anterior cerebellar mean doses were 14.78 ± 15.69 Gy in Group A and 15.20 ± 11.51 Gy in Group B ( p = 0.944), while posterior cerebellar doses were 10.73 ± 12.67 Gy and 10.26 ± 10.51 Gy, respectively ( p = 0.928). The corpus callosum exhibited the largest absolute inter-group difference, with a mean dose of 35.91 ± 17.45 Gy in Group A compared to 30.70 ± 12.92 Gy in Group B ( p = 0.440). Minimum and maximum dose comparisons in the corpus callosum also followed a similar trend, though not statistically significant. In patients with bilateral hippocampi, the mean dose was 15.54 ± 23.80 Gy in Group A and 21.89 ± 17.31 Gy in Group B ( p = 0.486). No statistically significant differences were observed in any of the analyzed dose parameters between the two groups ( Table 4 ). Table 4. Comparison of radiation dose parameters to brain structures between patients with and without significant neurocognitive decline. Structure Dose parameter Group A Group B Mean SD Median Mean SD Median P value Hippocampus D Min 11.16 12.45 5.27 10.26 8.66 8.67 0.847 D Max 33.38 20.59 22.72 30.38 15.58 28.77 0.707 D Mean 20.29 16.71 14.46 19.86 8.94 17.64 0.940 Amygdala D Min 15.66 13.46 14.19 15.17 10.44 13.19 0.927 D Max 30.38 24.32 25.93 30.57 15.89 26.62 0.982 D Mean 22.23 17.42 21.26 22.10 11.88 21.39 0.984 Anterior Cerebellum D Min 3.25 3.78 1.56 3.37 4.77 1.33 0.955 D Max 31.88 27.13 18.05 41.36 16.17 43.42 0.329 D Mean 14.78 15.69 7.67 15.20 11.51 11.35 0.944 Posterior Cerebellum D Min 2.29 2.35 1.40 2.56 3.47 1.20 0.841 D Max 29.66 29.21 13.03 36.06 19.72 42.37 0.556 D Mean 10.73 12.67 5.18 10.26 10.51 6.23 0.928 Corpus Callosum D Min 15.63 15.02 7.49 13.30 9.58 11.29 0.669 D Max 54.95 9.03 56.65 47.50 13.28 49.67 0.164 D Mean 35.91 17.45 33.66 30.70 12.92 33.92 0.440 Hippocampus Bilateral Cases D Min 8.38 15.40 3.24 10.56 10.65 8.67 0.705 D Max 20.27 30.49 16.66 32.41 22.48 42.69 0.305 D Mean 15.54 23.80 10.28 21.89 17.31 28.59 0.486 Discussion Neurocognitive function has become an essential parameter in the management of primary CNS malignancies, especially as survival improves with multimodal treatments. Cognitive impairment in these patients arises not only from the tumour itself but also from interventions such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. This prospective study aimed to evaluate neurocognitive decline following focal radiotherapy (RT) in glioma patients using the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III), and to explore associations between cognitive change and radiation dose to key neuroanatomical structures. A statistically significant decline in total ACE-III scores was observed post-radiotherapy, with mean scores decreasing from 89.48 ± 6.84 to 87.91 ± 6.29 (p = 0.007). Domain-wise, attention, language, and fluency were the most affected, while memory and visuospatial abilities were preserved. Notably, patients who exhibited greater cognitive decline tended to have received higher doses to key neural structures, particularly the corpus callosum. The ACE-III tool enabled domain-specific assessment of cognitive change, capturing subtle yet meaningful declines in attention, language, and fluency. Compared to tools like the MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) and HVLT-R (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised), the ACE-III offers broader coverage and greater sensitivity to early changes. 11 This allowed for more precise mapping of cognitive changes to anatomical structures. These findings align with the growing understanding that radiotherapy to limbic system structures can lead to early cognitive impairment when critical neural structures are exposed to moderate-to-high doses. 16 While hippocampal avoidance has been the focus of most cognitive-sparing radiotherapy studies, including the NRG-CC001 trial which demonstrated memory preservation with hippocampal-sparing WBRT plus memantine, our data highlight that attention and fluency were more prominently affected domains. 17 This discrepancy may reflect the focal, rather than whole-brain, nature of RT in glioma patients. The corpus callosum, a major interhemispheric white matter tract responsible for integrating cortical functions and sustaining attention, showed a strong trend toward correlation with cognitive decline in our cohort. Although statistical significance was not reached across all metrics, higher doses (>35 Gy) to the corpus callosum were associated with greater reductions in ACE-III scores. This is supported by the study by Redmond et al., who demonstrated that radiation exposure to white matter tracts such as the corpus callosum and superior longitudinal fasciculus predicted neurocognitive dysfunction in glioma patients. 18 Our findings are further corroborated by Chapman et al., who used diffusion tensor imaging to show microstructural degeneration of the corpus callosum associated with attention and processing speed deficits. 19 Of the 25 patients, 7 (28%) had abnormal ACE-III scores at baseline post-surgery. In contrast, 8 (32%) had abnormal scores at 6 months post-radiotherapy. This corresponds to a 4% increase in cognitive dysfunction after radiotherapy. The 28% baseline impairment reflects tumour- and surgery-related cognitive effects. Hence it may not be justified to refer radiotherapy as the primary cause for the observed cognitive decline, and therefore the results should be interpreted keeping in mind other possible clinical factors and outcomes. Although the hippocampus remains central to memory preservation strategies, our study did not find a statistically significant relationship between hippocampal dose and post-treatment memory decline. This contrasts with results from Gondi et al., who reported hippocampal dose-dependent memory loss, particularly in low-grade or benign intracranial tumours. 20 The absence of a similar association in our study may be attributed to lower hippocampal doses overall, contralateral compensation in unilateral lesions, or sample size constraints. Our study also examined radiation exposure to other critical brain structures. The amygdala and cerebellum, although not primary targets, received variable radiation doses depending on tumour location. Although no significant correlation with cognitive outcomes was noted, prior studies suggest these structures contribute to cognitive-affective integration and executive function. 21 A few Studies in literature have similarly identified radiation dose to frontal and temporal lobes as predictors of decline in language and fluency. 22 , 23 The findings also resonate with Haisraely et al., who proposed expanding dose-sparing protocols beyond the hippocampus to include white matter tracts. 24 Our results support this direction, showing that cognitive impairment involves a distributed neural network rather than isolated memory pathways alone. Talacchi et al. reported that cognitive diminution post-surgery can occur in up to 30–40% of patients, and more likely in executive functions, memory, and attention, domains largely mediated by frontal-subcortical networks. 4 As our study population had higher number of frontal lobe lesions, the cognitive impairment that we observed may reflect the impact of surgery on cognition. Despite the consistency with literature, our study has few limitations. The current analysis includes a smaller cohort and a short follow up time, which may have obscured significant dose-response associations. However, patient recruitment is ongoing, and future analyses with a larger sample size and extended follow-up are expected to strengthen the findings. Functional neuroimaging techniques, such as volumetric MRI or diffusion tensor imaging, were not incorporated at this stage, which may have further elucidated the structural basis of observed cognitive changes. However, patient recruitment is ongoing, and future analyses with a larger sample size and extended follow-up are expected to strengthen the findings and allow for more robust dose-volume-outcome correlations. Future studies should include larger, multicentric cohorts with longitudinal cognitive assessment and advanced neuroimaging. Expanding cognitive-sparing strategies to include midline white matter tracts, cerebellar structures, and language circuits may improve outcomes. Conclusion This study demonstrates that early neurocognitive decline following focal RT exists, particularly affecting attention and language. While hippocampal dose remains relevant, the corpus callosum appears to play a critical role in early cognitive impairment. These findings underscore the need for comprehensive neuroanatomical preservation in radiotherapy planning. Consent Written informed consent to take part in the research has been obtained from all patients when indicated. Consent for publication is not applicable as all data is anonymized, and no images are being published. Ethics statement The Institutional Ethics Committee of Kasturba Medical College approved this study, Mangalore, vide protocol no. IEC KMC MLR 09/2024/554 dated 19.09.2024. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines and regulations set forth by the institution. The study has been conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Author contributions All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization, methodology, data collection, analysis, manuscript writing, and revision. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Data availability statement Data Repository Used: FIGSHARE Link: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29245502.v1 Citation: Krishna A. Neurocognitive Study Datasheet. figshare; 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 1]. https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Neurocognitive_Study_Datasheet/29245502/1 25 This project contains the following underlying data: • DATA_Neuro_Figshare.xlsx Data are available under the terms of the CC by 4.0 license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) Acknowledgements Nil. References 1. Bray Bsc F, Mathieu L, Hyuna S, et al. : Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Wiley Online Library. 2024 May [cited 2024 Aug 15]; 74 (3): 229–263. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 2. Mathur P, Sathishkumar K, Chaturvedi M, et al. : Cancer Statistics, 2020: Report From National Cancer Registry Programme, India. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Nov [cited 2022 Sep 30]; 6 (6): 1063–1075. Publisher Full Text Reference Source 3. Bergo E, Lombardi G, Guglieri I, et al. : Neurocognitive functions and health-related quality of life in glioblastoma patients: a concise review of the literature. Eur. J. Cancer Care (Engl). 2019; 28 : NA. Reference Source 4. Talacchi A, Santini B, Savazzi S, et al. : Cognitive effects of tumour and surgical treatment in glioma patients. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2011; 103 : 541–549. Publisher Full Text Reference Source 5. Goda J, Dutta D, Krishna U, et al. : Hippocampal radiotherapy dose-constraints for predicting long-term neurocognitive outcomes: Mature data from a prospective trial in young patients with brain tumors. Neuro-Oncology. 2020; 22 : 1677–1685. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source 6. Saad S, Wang T: Neurocognitive Deficits After Radiation Therapy for Brain Malignancies. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015; 38 : 634–640. Publisher Full Text Reference Source 7. Hardy SJ, Finkelstein A, Milano M, et al. : Association of Radiation Dose to the Amygdala–Orbitofrontal Network with Emotion Recognition Task Performance in Patients with Low-Grade and Benign Brain Tumors. Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15 . PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source 8. Correa D: Neurocognitive Function in Brain Tumors. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2010; 10 : 232–239. Publisher Full Text Reference Source 9. Lageman S, Cerhan J, Locke D, et al. : Comparing neuropsychological tasks to optimize brief cognitive batteries for brain tumor clinical trials. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2009; 96 : 271–276. Publisher Full Text Reference Source 10. Zucchella C, Capone A, Codella V, et al. : Cognitive rehabilitation for early post-surgery inpatients affected by primary brain tumor: a randomized, controlled trial. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2013; 114 : 93–100. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source 11. Hsieh S, Schubert S, Hoon C, et al. : Validation of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III in Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2013 Sep 1 [cited 2025 Mar 26]; 36 (3–4): 242–250. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 12. Scoccianti S, Detti B, Cipressi S, et al. : Changes in neurocognitive functioning and quality of life in adult patients with brain tumors treated with radiotherapy. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2012; 108 : 291–308. Publisher Full Text Reference Source 13. Cabrera AR, Kirkpatrick JP, Fiveash JB, et al. : Radiation therapy for glioblastoma: Executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 2016 Jul 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1]; 6 (4): 217–225. Publisher Full Text Reference Source 14. Niyazi M, Brada M, Chalmers AJ, et al. : ESTRO-ACROP guideline “target delineation of glioblastomas.” Radiother. Oncol. 2016 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1]; 118 (1): 35–42. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source 15. Eekers DBP, Di Perri D, Roelofs E, et al. : Update of the EPTN atlas for CT- and MR-based contouring in Neuro-Oncology. Radiother. Oncol. 2021 Jul 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1]; 160 : 259–265. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source 16. Raschke F, Witzmann K, Seidlitz A, et al. : Time- and dose-dependent volume decreases in subcortical grey matter structures of glioma patients after radio (chemo)therapy. Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol. 2022 Sep 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1]; 36 : 99–105. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source 17. Brown PD, Gondi V, Pugh S, et al. : Hippocampal avoidance during whole-brain radiotherapy plus memantine for patients with brain metastases: Phase III trial NRG oncology CC001. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020 Apr 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1]; 38 (10): 1019–1029. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 18. Redmond KJ, Hildreth M, Sair HI, et al. : Association of Neuronal Injury in the Genu and Body of Corpus Callosum Following Cranial Irradiation in Children with Impaired Cognitive Control: A Prospective Study. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2018 Aug 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1]; 101 (5): 1234–1242. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 19. Chapman CH, Zhu T, Nazem-Zadeh M, et al. : Diffusion tensor imaging predicts cognitive function change following partial brain radiotherapy for low-grade and benign tumors. Radiother. Oncol. 2016 Aug 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1]; 120 (2): 234–240. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source 20. Gondi V, Pugh SL, Tome WA, et al. : Preservation of memory with conformal avoidance of the hippocampal neural stem-cell compartment during whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (RTOG 0933): A phase II multi-institutional trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014 Dec 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1]; 32 (34): 3810–3816. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 21. Stoodley CJ, Schmahmann JD: Functional topography in the human cerebellum: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 15 [cited 2025 Jun 1]; 44 (2): 489–501. Reference Source 22. Tibbs MD, Huynh-Le MP, Karunamuni R, et al. : Microstructural injury to left-sided perisylvian white matter predicts language decline after brain radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2020 Dec 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1]; 108 (5): 1218–1228. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 23. Kotecha R, Hall MD: Impact of radiotherapy dosimetric parameters on neurocognitive function in brain tumor patients. Neuro-Oncology. 2020 Nov 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1]; 22 (11): 1559–1561. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 24. Haisraely O, Mayer A, Jaffe M, et al. : Memory Tract Sparing Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Radiation Planning of Primary Brain Tumors. Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 2024 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1]; 15 (1): e3–e9. Publisher Full Text Reference Source 25. Krishna A: Neurocognitive Study Datasheet. figshare. 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 11]. Reference Source Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 10 Sep 2025 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, Manipal, India 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, Manipal, India Prerana Baruah Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Athiyamaan MS Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing Sourjya Banerjee Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing Johan Sunny Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Resources, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing Paul Simon Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing Muralidhar Pai Roles: Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Visualization Mayur Kamath Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Visualization Arjun Shetty Roles: Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources Challapalli Srinivas Roles: Data Curation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing Dilson Lobo Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing Sahana Srinivasan Roles: Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing Pooja Prakash Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing Abinesh E Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing Abhishek Krishna Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Article Versions (1) version 1 Published: 10 Sep 2025, 14:895 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.166763.1 Copyright © 2025 Baruah P et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Baruah P, MS A, Banerjee S et al. Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation with Limbic System Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Central Nervous System Tumours: A preliminary report [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :895 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.166763.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 10 Sep 2025 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Nagpal S. Reviewer Report For: Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation with Limbic System Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Central Nervous System Tumours: A preliminary report [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :895 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183800.r429724 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895/v1#referee-response-429724 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 27 Dec 2025 Seema Nagpal , Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, USA Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183800.r429724 Kudos to the authors for presenting a well written and well designed study of cognitive changes seen in patients with glioma who are treated with radiation. This is important work reflecting "on the ground truths" that many of is in ... Continue reading READ ALL Kudos to the authors for presenting a well written and well designed study of cognitive changes seen in patients with glioma who are treated with radiation. This is important work reflecting "on the ground truths" that many of is in the field accept, but are challenging to prove definitively, as this study demonstrates. There are trends, across the board, towards worse outcomes with more/higher exposure, but not quite meeting statistical significance. Those of us who see these patients every day know that they are impaired and larger fields seem to be worse, so why can't we demonstrate it? The ACEIII appears to be a better test than some others, but was also designed for patients with AD or, less iatrogenic dementias. I don't have an alternate battery to propose, but simply to make clear that none of these batteries were designed to capture the types of cognitive injury patterns we might see in these patients. Perhaps a few more sentences about that? Otherwise, I congratulate the authors on a study that was likely quite a bit of work...and working toward the common goal of making our patient's lives better by using our tools smarter. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Glioblastoma, glioma, brain metastases, leptomeningeal metastases (and radiation sparing!) I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Nagpal S. Reviewer Report For: Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation with Limbic System Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Central Nervous System Tumours: A preliminary report [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :895 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183800.r429724 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895/v1#referee-response-429724 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Rao SB. Reviewer Report For: Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation with Limbic System Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Central Nervous System Tumours: A preliminary report [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :895 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183800.r429715 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895/v1#referee-response-429715 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 27 Dec 2025 Sandesh B Rao , Department of Radiation Oncology, Father Muller Medical College,, Mangalore, India Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183800.r429715 It is a well conducted study assessing the neurocognitive outcomes and correlation with limbic system radiation doses in patients undergoing radiation for brain tumors. Literature review, study design, methodology and results appear logical. Interpretation of the result with statistical analysis ... Continue reading READ ALL It is a well conducted study assessing the neurocognitive outcomes and correlation with limbic system radiation doses in patients undergoing radiation for brain tumors. Literature review, study design, methodology and results appear logical. Interpretation of the result with statistical analysis looks logical.Conclusions are also make sense. In total a good study which can be considered for publication. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required. Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Head and neck Oncology, Breast oncology, Gynac oncology and CNS Oncology I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Rao SB. Reviewer Report For: Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation with Limbic System Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Central Nervous System Tumours: A preliminary report [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :895 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183800.r429715 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895/v1#referee-response-429715 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Sequeira L. Reviewer Report For: Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation with Limbic System Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Central Nervous System Tumours: A preliminary report [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :895 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183800.r429723 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895/v1#referee-response-429723 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 12 Nov 2025 Lanisha Sequeira , Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, India Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183800.r429723 This is a very good and seldom researched topic. I congratulate the researchers for taking up the research. The study is well conducted and i have only few minor comments. Introduction: Change “cranial nervous system tumours” ... Continue reading READ ALL This is a very good and seldom researched topic. I congratulate the researchers for taking up the research. The study is well conducted and i have only few minor comments. Introduction: Change “cranial nervous system tumours” to “central nervous system (CNS) tumours” for terminological consistency. Methodlogy: Correct grammar — should read “To assess whether the distribution of continuous variables followed a normal distribution, the Shapiro–Wilk test was applied. Results: Table 1 -Altered sensorium (8%.” → Missing closing parenthesis. Discussion. Write a note on use of temozolomide or concurrent PCV in the patients and its impact on the neurocognition. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Oncology I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Sequeira L. Reviewer Report For: Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation with Limbic System Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Central Nervous System Tumours: A preliminary report [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :895 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183800.r429723 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895/v1#referee-response-429723 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 10 Sep 2025 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 3 Version 1 10 Sep 25 read read read Lanisha Sequeira , Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, India Sandesh B Rao , Department of Radiation Oncology, Father Muller Medical College,, Mangalore, India Seema Nagpal , Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, USA Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Nagpal S. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 27 Dec 2025 | for Version 1 Seema Nagpal , Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, USA 0 Views copyright © 2025 Nagpal S. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Kudos to the authors for presenting a well written and well designed study of cognitive changes seen in patients with glioma who are treated with radiation. This is important work reflecting "on the ground truths" that many of is in the field accept, but are challenging to prove definitively, as this study demonstrates. There are trends, across the board, towards worse outcomes with more/higher exposure, but not quite meeting statistical significance. Those of us who see these patients every day know that they are impaired and larger fields seem to be worse, so why can't we demonstrate it? The ACEIII appears to be a better test than some others, but was also designed for patients with AD or, less iatrogenic dementias. I don't have an alternate battery to propose, but simply to make clear that none of these batteries were designed to capture the types of cognitive injury patterns we might see in these patients. Perhaps a few more sentences about that? Otherwise, I congratulate the authors on a study that was likely quite a bit of work...and working toward the common goal of making our patient's lives better by using our tools smarter. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Glioblastoma, glioma, brain metastases, leptomeningeal metastases (and radiation sparing!) I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Nagpal S. Peer Review Report For: Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation with Limbic System Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Central Nervous System Tumours: A preliminary report [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :895 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183800.r429724) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895/v1#referee-response-429724 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Rao S. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 27 Dec 2025 | for Version 1 Sandesh B Rao , Department of Radiation Oncology, Father Muller Medical College,, Mangalore, India 0 Views copyright © 2025 Rao S. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions It is a well conducted study assessing the neurocognitive outcomes and correlation with limbic system radiation doses in patients undergoing radiation for brain tumors. Literature review, study design, methodology and results appear logical. Interpretation of the result with statistical analysis looks logical.Conclusions are also make sense. In total a good study which can be considered for publication. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required. Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Head and neck Oncology, Breast oncology, Gynac oncology and CNS Oncology I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Rao SB. Peer Review Report For: Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation with Limbic System Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Central Nervous System Tumours: A preliminary report [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :895 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183800.r429715) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895/v1#referee-response-429715 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Sequeira L. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 12 Nov 2025 | for Version 1 Lanisha Sequeira , Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, India 0 Views copyright © 2025 Sequeira L. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions This is a very good and seldom researched topic. I congratulate the researchers for taking up the research. The study is well conducted and i have only few minor comments. Introduction: Change “cranial nervous system tumours” to “central nervous system (CNS) tumours” for terminological consistency. Methodlogy: Correct grammar — should read “To assess whether the distribution of continuous variables followed a normal distribution, the Shapiro–Wilk test was applied. Results: Table 1 -Altered sensorium (8%.” → Missing closing parenthesis. Discussion. Write a note on use of temozolomide or concurrent PCV in the patients and its impact on the neurocognition. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Oncology I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Sequeira L. Peer Review Report For: Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation with Limbic System Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Central Nervous System Tumours: A preliminary report [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :895 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183800.r429723) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895/v1#referee-response-429723 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895/v1&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Baruah P et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895/v1/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895", templates : { twitter : "Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes and Correlation.... Baruah P et al., published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/14-895/v1" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/166763/183800") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "183800"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "415374": 0, "415375": 0, "415372": 0, "415373": 0, "429718": 0, "429719": 0, "415380": 0, "429716": 0, "415381": 0, "429717": 0, "415378": 0, "415379": 0, "429715": 3, "415376": 0, "415377": 0, "429724": 2, "429722": 0, "429723": 4, "429720": 0, "429721": 0, "419238": 0, "422182": 0, "419239": 0, "422183": 0, "419236": 0, "422180": 0, "419237": 0, "422181": 0, "422178": 0, "422179": 0, "419244": 0, "419245": 0, "422186": 0, "419242": 0, "419243": 0, "422187": 0, "419240": 0, "422184": 0, "419241": 0, "422185": 0, "424902": 0, "424903": 0, "424900": 0, "424901": 0, "424899": 0, "424908": 0, "424906": 0, "424907": 0, "424904": 0, "424905": 0, "426606": 0, "426607": 0, "426604": 0, "426605": 0, "426603": 0, "426612": 0, "426610": 0, "426611": 0, "426608": 0, "426609": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "ed85288b-5898-4730-827c-099efda04bc2"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "
[email protected]", infoEmail: "
[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.