When AI Tells the Truth? Evaluating Different LLM Approaches to Reliable Trip Planning

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

This preprint evaluates a hybrid AI architecture for generating multi-day personalized travel itineraries under logistical constraints, using an iterative plan-execute-reflect loop that combines LLMs with retrieval-augmented generation, web search, and geospatial APIs. Across 371 scenarios varying by location, trip length, and transport mode, the authors compare three agent setups (LLM-only, LLM+Search, and geospatially aware LLM+Maps) and score temporal realism, preference alignment, hallucination rate, and computational efficiency. The key finding is that grounding LLMs in verified real-time data sources—especially Google Maps—virtually eliminates hallucinations and unrealistic timing, with the best overall performance from a geospatially grounded agent using Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2; the main caveat is that the work is a preprint and not peer reviewed. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a hybrid architecture for the automatic generation of multi-day, personalized travel itineraries that balance strict logistical constraints with individual traveler preferences. The system combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with retrieval-augmented generation, web search, and geospatial APIs in an iterative plan-execute-reflect loop. Three agent configurations - LLM-only, LLM + Search, and geospatially-aware LLM + Maps - were evaluated across 371 scenarios differing in location, trip length, and transport mode. Five quantitative metrics captured temporal realism, preference alignment, hallucination rate, and computational efficiency. Results show that grounding LLMs in verified, real-time data sources - especially via Google Maps - virtually eliminates hallucinations and unrealistic timing, producing feasible itineraries. The best overall performance was achieved by a geospatially-grounded agent using Claude~3.5 Sonnet~v2, highlighting the role of LLMs as high-level semantic orchestrators rather than autonomous planners.
Full text 10,659 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
When AI Tells the Truth? Evaluating Different LLM Approaches to Reliable Trip Planning | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article When AI Tells the Truth? Evaluating Different LLM Approaches to Reliable Trip Planning Vitalii Morskyi, Dawid Jaworski, Paweł Kuraś, Patryk Organiściak This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7389856/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This paper presents a hybrid architecture for the automatic generation of multi-day, personalized travel itineraries that balance strict logistical constraints with individual traveler preferences. The system combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with retrieval-augmented generation, web search, and geospatial APIs in an iterative plan-execute-reflect loop. Three agent configurations - LLM-only, LLM + Search, and geospatially-aware LLM + Maps - were evaluated across 371 scenarios differing in location, trip length, and transport mode. Five quantitative metrics captured temporal realism, preference alignment, hallucination rate, and computational efficiency. Results show that grounding LLMs in verified, real-time data sources - especially via Google Maps - virtually eliminates hallucinations and unrealistic timing, producing feasible itineraries. The best overall performance was achieved by a geospatially-grounded agent using Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2, highlighting the role of LLMs as high-level semantic orchestrators rather than autonomous planners. Large Language Models Grounded AI Travel Itinerary Generation Geospatial APIs Retrieval-Augmented Generation Hallucination Mitigation Hybrid AI Systems Trip Personalization Route Optimization Recommender Systems Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7389856","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":524593032,"identity":"8737e59c-6715-4d19-8c0b-43b049284ad8","order_by":0,"name":"Vitalii Morskyi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Rzeszów University of Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Vitalii","middleName":"","lastName":"Morskyi","suffix":""},{"id":524593033,"identity":"fc993ece-9060-4399-a816-7038ed6afcc7","order_by":1,"name":"Dawid Jaworski","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Rzeszów University of Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dawid","middleName":"","lastName":"Jaworski","suffix":""},{"id":524593034,"identity":"64279db3-167a-419b-8072-db0bea92fc83","order_by":2,"name":"Paweł Kuraś","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"AGH University of Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Paweł","middleName":"","lastName":"Kuraś","suffix":""},{"id":524593035,"identity":"2aef4d25-2c3c-4467-9e73-5f551a1ae98d","order_by":3,"name":"Patryk Organiściak","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Rzeszów University of Technology","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Patryk","middleName":"","lastName":"Organiściak","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-08-17 01:23:04","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7389856/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7389856/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":92826676,"identity":"800fbf24-392c-4c9f-a83c-9ae5f6f30ebf","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-06 04:35:12","extension":"json","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":5348,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"18bda8acc4fe46069a5428c7047a8d09.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7389856/v1/353a5727ef359d91bf8d21d5.json"},{"id":96246258,"identity":"bb0d8fc5-4f49-4029-9856-8c32f2b82e7c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:25:13","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1042652,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"WhenAITellstheTruth1.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7389856/v1_covered_001ca9ec-0b98-4c63-a2f9-b9281874d5d4.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"When AI Tells the Truth? Evaluating Different LLM Approaches to Reliable Trip Planning","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Large Language Models, Grounded AI, Travel Itinerary Generation, Geospatial APIs, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, Hallucination Mitigation, Hybrid AI Systems, Trip Personalization, Route Optimization, Recommender Systems","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7389856/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7389856/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"This paper presents a hybrid architecture for the automatic generation of multi-day, personalized travel itineraries that balance strict logistical constraints with individual traveler preferences. The system combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with retrieval-augmented generation, web search, and geospatial APIs in an iterative plan-execute-reflect loop. Three agent configurations - LLM-only, LLM + Search, and geospatially-aware LLM + Maps - were evaluated across 371 scenarios differing in location, trip length, and transport mode. Five quantitative metrics captured temporal realism, preference alignment, hallucination rate, and computational efficiency. Results show that grounding LLMs in verified, real-time data sources - especially via Google Maps - virtually eliminates hallucinations and unrealistic timing, producing feasible itineraries. The best overall performance was achieved by a geospatially-grounded agent using Claude~3.5 Sonnet~v2, highlighting the role of LLMs as high-level semantic orchestrators rather than autonomous planners.","manuscriptTitle":"When AI Tells the Truth? Evaluating Different LLM Approaches to Reliable Trip Planning","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-10-06 04:35:07","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7389856/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"ce16f11c-20e9-4ac0-ac6c-01fb50b4ce17","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 6th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-11-17T07:54:29+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-10-06 04:35:07","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7389856","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7389856","identity":"rs-7389856","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0