Abstract
Basic leucine zippers (bZIP) constitute one of the biggest protein families and evolutionarily
conserved transcription factors (TFs) in plants. We obtained mutant lines for two bZIP TFs,
HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76, in the genetic background of the barley cultivar Golden Promise
(GP) via targeted gene-specific mutagenesi s using an RNA-guided Cas9 endonuclease. A
comprehensive morphological, physiological and transcriptomic analysis was performed in
wild-type GP compared with hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 mutants under drought stress. The
morphological and physiological changes were similar in both mutants and in the wild-type
GP. Most strikingly, the mutants exhibited accelerated wilting and increased water loss. This
effect was primarily caused by higher stomatal conductance ( g
s) and transpiration rate ( E) in
mutants compared to wild-type GP under both control and drought conditions, which in turn
had a detrimental effect on the mutants’ intrinsic water use efficiency ( iWUE). Likewise, the
transcriptome profiles of hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 were more similar to each other than those
of wild-type GP. We found that the number of differentially regulated genes under control
versus drought-stress conditions was higher in the mutants than in wild-type GP, suggesting
that the mutants try to compensate for accelerated foliar water loss. The study highlights the
essential roles of HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 in balancing water loss in barley. These findings
provide a foundation for engineering enhanced drought tolerance in barley through targeted
manipulation of these genes to optimize transpiration rates.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
3
1. Introduction
Drought stress is one of the most significant challenges of food production in the current
context of climate uncertainty (Leng and Hall, 2019). Hence, drought stress tolerance is also
one of the widely researched topics in plant science and it is now well established that
tolerance mechanisms involve a complex interaction of multiple gene regulatory processes
(Nakashima et al. , 2025). Transcription factors (TFs) ar e central to these gene expression
networks that connect drought signaling to stress-responsive genes to determine optimal
physiological, biochemical and growth adjustments (Dhatterwal et al. , 2024). Among them,
the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) family is one of the most prominent and evolutionarily
conserved TF families in plants. bZIP TFs have two conserved domains, namely a basic
region and a leucine zipper domain (Jakoby et al. , 2002). The basic region is highly
conserved and facilitates the binding of bZIP proteins to specific DNA sequences, typically
containing a core ACGT motif, such as G-box (C ACGTG), C-box (C ACGTC) and A-box
(TACGTA) sequences (Li et al. , 2023). Beyond these ACGT-core motifs, the potential non-
ACGT targets of bZIP proteins are also identif ied in cereals and are referred to as coupling
element 1 (CE1, CCACCG) (Shen and Ho, 1995; Shen et al. , 1996; Roychoudhury and
Sengupta, 2009) and CE3 (CGTGTC) (Hobo et al. , 1999). The leucine zipper region is
another conserved binding domain t hat is characterized by leucine residues, which facilitate
the formation of homo- or heterodimers with different members of the bZIP family proteins
(Kaur et al. , 2025). This modular architecture of bZIP TFs highlights their versatility in
regulating a wide range of biological processes in plants.
Ten groups of bZIP proteins (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I and S) have been described for
Arabidopsis and members of the group A are invo lved in responses to abiotic stresses,
including drought, cold and salinity tolerance (Fujita et al., 2005; Yoshida et al., 2015; Chang
et al., 2019). They are usually referred to as ABA-responsive element (ABRE)-binding TFs
(ABFs). Among them, the binding property of four ABFs (ABF1, AREB1/ ABF2, ABF3 and
AREB2/ ABF4) to ABREs was identified through yeast one-hybrid screening and
electrophoretic mobility shift assays (Choi et al. , 2000; Uno et al. , 2000). These four
respective genes are highly expressed in vegetative tissue and their expression is
significantly induced by abiotic stress (Yoshida et al. , 2010; Yoshida et al. , 2015). Over-
expression lines of ABFs showed enhanced stress adaptation while the knockout lines were
sensitive to drought stress in several plant species, including Arabidopsis (Fujita et al., 2005;
Yoshida et al. , 2010; Hossain et al. , 2010; Huang et al. , 2010; Amir Hossain et al. , 2010;
Yoshida et al. , 2015; Wang et al. , 2016). Four other genes from the AREB family
(ABI5/DPBF1, DPBF2, AREB3/DPBF3 and DPBF4 ) have more specialized expression
patterns. Among the four DPBF g
enes, DPBF1 is expressed in roots, leaves and
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
4
reproductive tissues, while DPBF2 expression is strictly specific to seeds. DPBF3 shows
lower overall expression across tissues and growth conditions than other DPBF genes.
Unlike stress-inducible ABFs, the four DPBFs are involved in seed germination, seed
maturation, floral development and the regulation of energy homeostasis (Nijhawan et al. ,
2008; Alonso et al., 2009; van Leene et al., 2016).
Despite the importance of group A bZIP TFs in stress adaptation and plant development, a
comprehensive understanding of their functional diversity and the regulatory networks that
govern their actions remains incomplete. This is especially valid for barley and concerns both
the downstream target genes they activate and the upstream signals that modulate their
expression and activity. For instance, the roles of some genes of the ABF and DPBF class of
bZIP TFs were studied in rice, wheat and maize (Xiang et al. , 2008; Hossain et al. , 2010;
Tang et al., 2012; Wei et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2014; Zhang et al. , 2017; He et al., 2024). For
example, multiple bZIP TFs in rice, namely, OsABF2, OsbZIP23, OsbZIP46, OsbZIP71 and
OsbZIP72, act as positive regulators of drought and salt tolerance by integrating ABA
signaling. Likewise, bZIP genes in wheat (sub-group A) conferred abiotic stress tolerance
when over-expressed in Arabidopsis ( Traes_7AL_25850F96F.1, TabZIP174), as well as
nitrogen use efficiency (TabZIP60) in wheat (Li et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2019; Agarwal et al.,
2019). To date, only one group A bZIP gene has been functionally characterized in barley.
Recent studies showed that constitutive overexpression of HvbZIP77 in Arabidopsis
enhanced drought tolerance but reduced seed size (Al-Sayaydeh et al., 2024).
From the genome-wide identification of bZIP genes in barley, it was concluded that they
belong to a large family with 89 and 92 genes, as reported for the Morex genome versions 1
(Pourabed et al., 2015) and 2 (Zhong et al., 2021), respectively. These members of the bZIP
family were grouped into ten clusters (A-I and S) based on the gene structure and expression
pattern. Although these studies provided a comp rehensive catalog and classification of bZIP
genes in barley, their biological roles remain largely unexplored. Previous evidence from
promoter activation assays in barley and ot her cereals suggests that group A bZIP
transcription factors ( HvABI5/HvbZIP56, HvABF1/ HvbZIP33, HvABF2/ HvbZIP77 and
HvABF3/ HvbZIP52) may act as positive regulators of ABA-responsive genes. For example,
minimal promoter regions of HVA22 containing an ABA-responsive complex (ABRC)
composed of ACGT-ABRE, CE3 and C
E1 have been shown to drive ABA-dependent
reporter expression in barley (Shen et al., 1993; Shen and Ho, 1995; Gómez-Cadenas et al.,
1999; Casaretto and Ho, 2003; Shen et al., 2004; Cao et al., 2007). Later, Schoonheim et al.
(2009) showed that ectopic expression in alurone cells co-transfected with ABF1/ABF3 and
ABRC:GUS was sufficient to transactivate GUS even without ABA application.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
5
Nonetheless, the functional significance of most bZIP TFs in barley remains unknown. This
research aimed to identify and characterize bZIP TFs in barley using a combination of
bioinformatics approaches and experimental validation. We employed Cas9-mediated
genome editing to create potential loss-of-function mutants of two bZIP TFs in barley.
Subsequently, the mutant lines were phenotyped under drought-stress and control conditions
at the seedling stage. A comprehensive RNA-seq analysis was performed to profile the
transcriptomes of mutant lines for two bZIP TFs under drought stress to identify their
downstream target genes.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
6
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Selection of bZIP transcription factors for functional studies
In the first step, we compared the bZIP genes annotated in the barley reference genome
(Morex V3) with those present in Morex V2 (Zhong et al. , 2021). Because the goal was to
identify barley homologs of AREBs (class A bZIP family proteins) from Arabidopsis, we
aligned the protein sequence of the HvbZIPs in the Morex V3 sequence and nine AREBs
(class A bZIP family proteins) from Arabidopsis using the “msa” package in R. The protein
alignment file was used as input to constr uct the phylogenetic tree using the “phytools”
package in R.
Among the genes that clustered together with Arabidopsis AREBs, we selected
HORVU.MOREX.r3.6HG0619650, HvbZIP76 and HORVU.MOREX.r3.3HG0300770,
HvbZIP33 for functional validation based on prior information on those genes (Figure S1).
We selected a target motif in exon 1 of HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 (Figure 1). The respective
gRNA was synthesized and inserted into pSH91 using a restriction enzyme ( BsaI). The
validated clones were digested with SfiI and the gRNA and Cas9-containing fragment was
transferred to the generic binary vector p6I D35STE9 (DNA Cloning Service, Hamburg),
which carries hpt for plant selection. Immature embryos of barley inbred Golden Promise
(GP) were used for Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer according to (Marthe et al., 2015).
2.2. Genotyping the T0, T1 and T2 generation
Mutation events in T0 progenies were detected by Sanger sequencing at both the target and
predicted off-target sites. Subsequently, 48 T
1 progenies from T 0 plants that exhibited
mutation events were screened for T-DNA. T 1 progeny from each selected T 0 line that tested
negative for T-DNA insertion were sequenced to detect homozygous mutation events. The
positive T1 progeny for mutation events were selfed to obtain T 2 seeds. Finally, T2 progenies
were again genotyped for the absence of T-DNA as a confirmation and sequenced to identify
transgene-free T 2 plants that are homozygous for mutation events in the target genes.
Verified T2 progenies were self-pollinated to obtai n seeds from individuals homozygous for
mutant alleles, enabling characterization of the mutants under drought stress. The mutant
lines for HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 are referred to as hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 in the following
text.
2.3. Plant growth conditions and drought treatment
Seeds were pregerminated using a peat-based po tting mixture, ED73 classic, produced and
marketed by Einheitserde, Germany and two-day-old seedlings were transferred to a pot (8 x
8 x 7 cm). The pots were filled with an equal volume of mixture containing 60% natural sand
and 40% topsoil (Terrasoil; Cordel and Sohn). The plants were grown in the greenhouse
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
7
under the following conditions: a daily mean temperature of 18-22°C, a 14/10 h light/dark
cycle and a light intensity of 110-150 μ mol m -2 s -1. The field capacity of the soil was
maintained at 80% under control conditions. Pots were weighed twice a day and manually
watered to maintain a constant soil moisture level. Drought stress was induced by
withholding water from 14-day-old seedlings. T he weight of the pots was recorded daily to
ensure a consistent moisture level in all pots.
2.4. Tissue water status and oxidative stress marker evaluation
Relative water content (RWC) and electrolyt e leakage (EL) were evaluated according to
(Shrestha et al., 2022). First, the tip of the first fully expanded leaf from the top was removed.
Then, two leaf sections (around 2 cm each) were detached from the first fully expanded leaf
and the fresh weight was recorded (FW). Subsequently, the leaf sections were dipped into
centrifuge tubes containing 10 ml of deionized water and incubated at room temperature for
24 h. The leaf sections were removed from the centrifuge tube and excess water was gently
wiped away with a paper towel before measuring t he turgor weight (TW). The dry weight was
recorded after the sample was oven-dried at 70°C for 72 hours. RWC was estimated as (FW-
DW)/(TW-DW) *100.
For EL measurement, centrifuge tubes were filled with 10 mL of deionized water and the
initial electrical conductivity (ECi) was recorded . Then, two leaf sections (approximately 2 cm
each) from the same leaf used for RWC were excised and placed in a centrifuge tube
containing 10 mL of double-distilled water. The tubes were stored in the dark at room
temperature. Electrical conductivity was me asured after a 24 h rehydration period (ECf).
After the final reading, the samples were boiled at 100°C for 30 minutes, cooled to room
temperature and the total electrical conductivity (ECt) was measured. EL was expressed as
(ECf-ECi)/(ECt-ECi)*100.
Oxidative damage to the lipid membrane duri ng drought was estimated by determining the
malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration using the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) method (Hodges et
al., 1999), adapted to a microplate-based protocol (Dziwornu et al. , 2018) with some
modifications. Shoot samples were homogenized in liquid nitrogen and MDA was extracted
with 1.5 ml of 0.1% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), followed by centrifuging at 14,000 g for 15
minutes at 4°C. Then, 500
μ L of supernatant was mixed with reaction solution I (0.01% 2,6-
di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) in 20% TCA) and reaction solution II (0.65% TBA, 0.01%
BHT in 20% TCA) in a 1:1 ratio. Reaction and sample mix were incubated at 95°C for 30
minutes. The reaction was stopped on ice for five minutes and the mixture was centrifuged at
8000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The absorbance was measured at 440 nm, 532 nm and 600
nm using a microplate reader (TECAN Infinite 200 Pro, TECAN Group Limited, Switzerland).
MDA concentration was expressed as nanomoles per gram fresh weight.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
8
2.5. Gas exchange experiment
Gas exchange was measured using a portable photosynthesis system (LI-6400XT gas
exchange analyzer; LI-COR Biosciences) 3, 6 and 9 days after the start of the drought stress
treatment (DAS). The measurements were made on the first fully expanded leaves from the
top at 3 DAS (three true leaves fully expanded). Subsequently, measurements were made at
6 and 9 DAS on the same leaf for all plants in each treatment to minimize leaf effects. The
parameters inside the leaf chamber were set to a saturated photosynthetic active radiation of
1500
μ mol m−2 s−1, a relative humidity of approximately 52%, a temperature corresponding to
the leaf temperature and a flow rate of 400 μ mol s −1. The infrared gas exchange analyzer
automatically logs the photosynthetic parameters, including the rate of CO 2 assimilation ( A),
intercellular CO2 (Ci), stomatal conductance ( gs) and transpiration rate ( E). All observations
were adjusted to 25°C. The experiment was performed twice, with four biological replications
per genotype per treatment (i.e., eight plants).
2.6. Data processing and statistical analysis
Statistical significance was assessed using open-access statistical computing software R,
version 4.3.1. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for physiological and photosynthetic traits
was performed using the following model
/g1877 /g3036/g3037/g3038/g3039/g3040/g3404 μ /g3397/g1833 /g3036/g3397/g1846 /g3037/g3397/g4666 /g1833 :/g1846 /g4667 /g3036/g3037/g3397/g4666 /g1846 :/g1844 /g4667 /g3037/g3038/g3397 /g4666 /g1846: /g1830/g1827/g1845 /g4667 /g3037/g3040/g3397/g2013 /g3036/g3037/g3038/g3039,
where /g1877 /g3036/g3037/g3038/g3039/g3040was the phenotypic observation, /g4666μ ) the general mean, ( /g1833 /g3036) the effect of
genotype, (/g1846 /g3037) the effect of treatment, /g4666/g1833: /g1846/g4667 /g3036/g3037 the effect of genotype by treatment interaction,
/g4666/g1846: /g1844/g4667 /g3037/g3038 the effect of the experiment nested within treatment, /g4666 /g1846: /g1830/g1827/g1845 /g4667 /g3037/g3039 effect of days after
the start of stress nested within treatment and ( /g2013 /g3036/g3037/g3038/g3039) the error term. Because plant biomass
was only estimated at 9 DAS, the ANOVA was performed for this character using the above
equation without /g4666 /g1846: /g1830/g1827/g1845 /g4667 /g3037/g3039 effect.
Adjusted entry means and standard errors of means were estimated using the “emmean”
package in R. Multiple mean comparisons were performed using the LSD test.
2.7. RNAseq analysis of hvbzip76 and hvbzip33 under drought stress
We profiled the transcriptomes of GP, hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76 under both control and
drought stress conditions. The growing environm ent and stress treatment were identical to
those described previously for the physiological experiments. Fresh shoot samples were
collected 7 DAS, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C before RNA extraction.
Shoot materials were homogenized in liquid nitrogen, and RNA was extracted using the
Monarch RNA Miniprep Kit (New England Biolabs, USA) according to the manufacturer’s
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
9
instructions. The RNA concentration and quality were determined by electrophoresis on a 1%
Agarose gel and by NanoDrop (NanoDrop 2000c, T hermo Fisher Scientific, USA) before
shipping. RNA integrity was further verified by using a Bioanalyzer (Agilent 2100, Agilent
Technologies, USA). The samples that passed the RNA integrity check (with an integrity
value of ≥ 6.3) were used for library preparation. Novogen Europe performed library
preparation and sequencing.
We obtained the paired-end read sequence and the quality control of raw sequencing reads
was performed using FastQC (Andrews, 2010). Then, the adaptor sequence and reads less
than 70 bp were trimmed using Trimmomatic (Bolger et al. , 2014). Trimmed reads were
aligned to the barley reference genome sequence (https://data.jgi.doe.gov/refine-
download/phytozome?organism=HvulgareMorex&expanded=Phytozome-702) using HISAT2
(Pertea et al. , 2016). The unmapped reads were filtered before further processing. To be
selected as a mapped read,
≥ 80% of the length of a read should have mapped to the
Reference
sequence sharing /i3≥/i3 90% identity. On average, more than 80% of the trimmed
reads mapped to the reference. Differential gene expression (DEG) analysis was performed
using the edgeR package (Chen et al. , 2016). First, the read count for uniquely mapped
sequences was normalized to the sample's sequencing depth and expressed as log counts
per million mapped reads. A negative binomial distribution was fitted prior to DEG estimation
using the log2 fold change in read counts for the drought treatment relative to the control.
Quasi-likelihood F-test was applied and P ≤ 0.05 was set as a significance threshold (Chen
et al., 2016). Multiple testing correction was performed for the significant DEGs list to control
the false discovery rate to P ≤ 0.05, according to (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995).
Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis (G OEA) for DEGs was performed using goatools
v1.4.12 (Klopfenstein et al. , 2018) to identify the enriched GO terms. For this analysis, we
annotated the whole proteome of Morex using InterProScan5 (Jones et al. , 2014). We used
the GO annotation of the entire barley proteome as a background set in GOEA.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
10
3. Results
3.1. Mutation events in HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76
Recently, (Zhong et al. , 2021) showed that the Morex genome (version 2) comprises 92
HvbZIP genes. We identified five additional members beyond those listed by (Zhong et al. ,
2021) in the Morex reference version 3 (Table S1). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that 18
HvbZIP TFs belong to group A bZIP proteins, eight more than those reported for Arabidopsis.
The 18 genes of group A can be assigned to four sub-clusters: ABF1-ABF4-like sub-cluster,
DPBF3-DPBF4-like sub-cluster, DPBF1-DPBF2- like sub-cluster and bZIP15-like sub-cluster
(Figure S1). The first sub-cluster of gr oup A bZIPs that branched alongside ABF1-ABF4
comprised four genes: HvbZIP56, HvbZIP76, HvbZIP77 and HvbZIP96 . Four HvbZIPs,
including HvbZIP33, clustered alongside the DPBF1-DPBF2-like sub-cluster. HvbZIP30 and
HvbZIP07 were the closest barely proteins to the AtDPBF3-AtDPBF4-like sub-cluster,
whereas eight HvbZIPs were close to Arabidopsis bZIP15 (Figure S1). The genes used for
functional validation in the current study, HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 , comprise four exons
each. The N-terminal region consists of tw o adjacent intrinsically disordered regions,
including phosphorylation sites and binding site s for co-activators and repressors. The C-
terminal region contains the conserved bZIP domain that is responsible for dimerization and
DNA binding (Figure 1).
After analyzing the regenerated plants, we obtained seven transgene-positive plants carrying
gRNAs targeting HvbZIP33 and one transgene-positive plant carrying a gRNA targeting
HvbZIP76 (Table S2). Sequencing of target regions detected mutation events in six T
0
progenies for HvbZIP33 and one for HvbZIP76 (Table S2). No off-target mutations were
detected at predicted off-target sites for both gR NAs. We detected three allelic mutants for
HvbZIP33 with one bp insertion, one bp deletion and four bp deletion, namely hvbzip33-1,
hvbzip33-2 and hvbzip33-3 (Figure 1A). All three allelic mu tations introduced premature stop
codons upstream of the bZIP domain in the HvbZIP33 protein, thereby completely disrupting
the bZIP motif in all mutants (Figure S2). We identified a single allelic variant of HvbZIP76,
characterized by a GTC deletion in the first ex on (Figure 1B). The three bp deletion resulted
in an in-frame removal of a serine residue with in the intrinsically disordered region (Figure
S3). This allelic mutant is referred to as hvbzip76 in the following text.
3.2. Physiological and biochemical response of hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 to
drought stress
To understand the functions of HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76, we compared wild-type Golden
Promise (GP) and the mutants with respect to morphological, physiological and biochemical
traits under control and drought conditions. Plant height and shoot fresh weight at the
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
11
seedling stage (21-day-old plants) were highest for GP and lowest for hvbzip33-3 under
control conditions (Figure 2A-B). We observed a decrease in plant height and shoot weight in
young seedlings in a treatment-dependent m anner (Figure 2). Upon exposure to drought
stress, all allelic mutants of hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 showed wilting symptoms considerably
earlier than GP. Initial wilting symptoms appeared at 6 DAS, with pronounced differences
between GP and mutants occurring at 7 DAS (Figure 3a). Measurements of RWC and EL
revealed significant effects of genotype, treatment and the interaction between genotype and
treatment (Table 1). A significant reduction in RWC was observed at 9 DAS, which was more
pronounced in hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 mutants compared to GP under drought stress (Figure
3b). EL, as an indicator of membrane damage, also increased under drought stress, with EL
values significantly greater in hvbzip33-3 than wild-type GP at 9 DAS (Figure S4a). Although
MDA concentration rose under drought stress relati ve to control conditions at 9 DAS, no
significant differences were detected between wild-type GP and any of the hvbzip76 and
hvbzip33 mutants (Figure S4b). We did not observe differences in plant morphology between
adult wild-type GP plants and mutants under control conditions (Figure S5).
3.3. Photosynthetic response of hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 to drought stress
Next, we conducted a gas-exchange experiment to quantify differences in photosynthetic
parameters among wild-type GP, hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76. In general, under control
conditions, gs, E and Ci were slightly lower in wild-type GP than in both mutant lines (Figure
4A-B, Figure S6). E and gs decreased under drought stress, with the reduction being more
pronounced in wild-type GP than in hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76 at 3 and 6 DAS. However, the
pattern was reversed at 9 DAS under drought (Figure 4A-B). Without drought stress, A was
only slightly higher (statistical ly non-significant) in mutants hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76 than in
wild-type GP. At 3 DAS, hvbzip76 had shown the highest A value under drought stress.
Although statistically non-significant, A was lower in both mutants than in wild-type GP at 9
DAS under drought stress (Figure 4C). We also estimated iWUE as the ratio of A to gs.
Because GP transpired less than both mutants, iWUE in wild-type GP was significantly
higher under control conditions compared to the mutants (Figure 4D). Likewise, iWUE
increased significantly under drought stress compared to control conditions, in a genotype-
dependent manner. For example, we observed a clear trend of lower iWUE at all three
measurement time points in hvbzip33-3 than in wild-type GP. In contrast, iWUE was lower in
hvbzip76 than in wild-type GP under control conditions, whereas it was on a par in wild-type
GP and hvbzip76 under drought stress (Figure 4D).
3.4. Transcriptome analysis of hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 mutants in barley
Next, we performed a genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of wild-type GP, hvbzip76 and
hvbzip33-3 to identify differentially regulated genetic components under control and drought
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
12
conditions. In accordance with our previous study (Shrestha et al. , 2022), we observed that
HvbZIP76 expression was upregulated in barley in response to drought stress. We did not
detect HvbZIP33 expression in leaf tissue at the seedling stage under either control or stress
conditions (Figure S7).
A total of 19004 genes were co-expressed acro ss all examined inbreds under both control
and drought conditions (Figure S8). Principal component (PC) analysis of these global
expression patterns revealed that PC1 (46. 13% variance) and PC2 (37.18% variance)
together accounted for 83.31% of the total tr anscriptomic variation (Figure 5A). The two
mutants clustered together along PC2 and were prim arily differentiated from wild-type GP by
PC1. While PC1 and PC2 were strongly associated with genotype differences in expression,
PC3 and PC4 showed stronger correlations with treatment conditions (Figure 5B), indicating
that higher-order principal components captur e condition-specific transcriptomic responses
(Figure 5D).
Among the expressed genes, a total of 3368, 3081 and 2448 DEGs were identified between
control and drought conditions in hvbzip76, hvbzip33-3 and wild-type GP, respectively,
suggesting a higher number of DEGs in mutants than wild-type GP (Figure 6A, Table S3-
S10). We detected a substantial central ov erlap of 1809 genes affected by drought stress,
indicating the existence of fundamental drought -stress-responsive pathways. The number of
unique DEGs was highest in hvbzip76 (1230) compared to hvbzip33-3 (409), indicating (i)
broader regulatory influence due to mutation in HvbZIP76 and (ii) existence of non-redundant
regulatory functions. The 777 DEGs between hvbzip76 and hvbzip33-3 may represent core
genes under the control of HvbZIP76 and HvbZIP33 (Figure 6A).
GOEA identified 19 biological processes and 38 molecular functions across six differential
gene-expression contexts (Figure 6B and Figure S9). The context represents upregulated
and downregulated genes in wild-type GP and mutants. The canonical drought-stress
response GO terms, such as response to water (GO:0009415), proline biosynthetic
processes (GO:0006561), and protein phosphor ylation (GO:0006468), were the most
enriched among DEGs across all three genotypes. While two of the GO terms mentioned
above were associated with genes upregulated under drought stress (GO:0009415 and
GO:0006561), we observed coordinated suppression of genes encoding broad protein
kinase activity. Interestingly, a specific group of protein kinases (GO:0004672) was linked
among the upregulated genes under drought stress. Protein dephosphorylation
(GO:0006470) and embryo development (GO:0009790) processes were also associated with
up-regulated genes across all the genotypes. One of the most striking differences was the
response to desiccation (GO:0009269), which was enriched among upregulated genes only
in the wild-type GP (Figures 6B and S9).
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
13
Around 30 genes with sequence-specific DNA-binding (GO:0043565) properties were
present in both up- and downregulated contexts in wild-type GP. In contrast, they were
present only in the upregulated contexts in both mutants. Metal ion binding and transport
functions were also enriched among the DEGs. While calcium ion binding (GO:0005509) was
universally enriched in downregulated contex ts, iron ion binding (GO:0005506) was enriched
among upregulated genes. It was noteworthy that heme binding (GO:0020037) GO terms
were enriched in the downregulated context in both mutants, while metal ion transmembrane
transporter activity (GO:0046873, GO:0005385) was particularly enriched in the
downregulated context in hvbzip33-3. Peroxidase activity (GO:0004601) was enriched
among downregulated genes in hvbzip76 (Figures 6B and S9).
Because we observed higher g
s and E values in mutants than in wild-type GP, we examined
in detail the expression of genes known to regulate stomatal opening and closing under
drought stress. We found that the fold change (control vs. drought) for the gene annotated as
INDETERMINATE DOMAIN PROTEIN 14 (IDD14) was lowest in hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76
compared to wild-type GP. Similarly, the fold change relative to the control for the OPEN
STOMATA 1 (OST1) gene was also lower in hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76 than in wild-type GP
(Figure 6C). The fold change of another gene associated with stomatal movement, ACTIN-
DEPOLYMERIZING FACTOR 5 (ADF5), was lowest in bzip33-3, followed by hvbzip76 and
highest in wild-type GP (Figure 6C). These genes are known to regulate stomata pore size
and higher expression facilitates stomata closure, reducing water loss during drought stress
(Mustilli et al., 2002; Qian et al. , 2019; Liu et al., 2022). Therefore, the higher fold change in
the expression of the above-discussed genes in wild-type GP might explain the earlier
reduction in foliar transpiration in GP than in both mutants.
4. Discussion
Our study aimed to characterize barley HvbZIP genes that are closely related to the
Arabidopsis group A bZIP TF family. Phylogenetic analyses showed that 18 HvbZIP genes
branched within the Arabidopsis group A bZIP TF, which comprises four ABF1-ABF4-like,
DPBF3-DPBF4-like, DPBF1-DPBF2-like and bZIP15-like sub-clusters (Figure S1). HvbZIP33
(referred to as ABF1 in earlier studies but closely related to DPBF2) cotransfected with
ABRC:GUS transactivated GUS in a transient expression assay (Schoonheim et al. , 2007;
Schoonheim et al., 2009), indicating a possible role in ABA-mediated transcription activation.
HvbZIP33 is the closest Arabidopsis ortholog of DPBF2 and may play a role in silique
development. Similarly, HvbZIP76 (highly similar to ABF1-ABF4) was activated in four
different barley accessions in an ABA-dependent manner, indicating a possible role in ABA-
signaling (Shrestha et al. , 2022). Therefore, we selected HvbZIP33 (DPBF-like clade) and
HvbZIP76 (ABF-like clade) for functional validation in the current study. For both genes, we
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
14
generated potential loss-of-function mutations using the RNA-guided Cas9 system (Figures
1, S2 and S3).
4.1. Function of HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 genes in plant development
Previous studies have shown that bZIP transcription factors are involved in multiple critical
physiological functions, including stress responses, development and metabolism (Jakoby et
al., 2002). In addition, the DPBF-like clade in Arabidopsis is known to be involved in
reproductive development (Lopez-Molina et al., 2003; Mendes et al., 2013). Since HvbZIP33
and HvbZIP76 are also expressed in the inflorescence (Mascher et al., 2017), we initially
examined whether the spikes of the corr esponding mutants displayed any developmental
defects. We observed that the number of grai ns per ear and thousand-grain weight were not
significantly reduced in hvbzip76 and hvbzip33 compared to wild-type GP (Figure S5). While
DPBF2 influences silique development in Arabidopsis, functional studies of the HvbZIP33
and HvbZIP76 orthologs in rice have primarily focused on stress response rather than
reproductive traits, leaving the effects on gr ain size and number in monocots largely
unexplored (Xiang et al. , 2008; Tang et al. , 2012; Chuxin et al. , 2021). Plant height and ear
numbers in adult plants of hvbzip76, hvbzip33 and wild-type GP were not significantly
different from each other (Figure S5). In cont rast, plant height and shoot fresh weight were
markedly lower in hvbzip33-3 during the seedling stage. This implies that hvbzip33-3 plants
employ compensatory growth mechanisms that allow them to catch up to wild-type by
maturity.
4.2. HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 influence foliar transpiration in barley
Drought experiments at the seedling stage revealed a striking physiological difference among
the two mutants and the wild-type GP, where the mutants consistently showed higher gs and
E at 3 DAS and 6 DAS under drought stress, resulting in lower iWUE. This might have
contributed to the more rapid wilting and lower RWC in hvbzip76 and hvbzip33 than in wild-
type GP (Figure 2A). Our observation was consistent with findings in other species. In rice,
lines overexpressing OsbZIP23, a group A bZIP TF, exhibited a reduced transpiration rate
compared with the wild-type (Xiang et al. , 2008). Similarly, transgenic Arabidopsis
overexpressing CaADBZ1 (a pepper bZIP TF from the same group A clade) showed
enhanced ABA sensitivity and stomatal closure (Choi et al., 2025). Furthermore, Arabidopsis
ABF knockout mutants showed higher water loss rates than wild-type in detached leaf
assays (Yoshida et al., 2010; Seller and Schroeder, 2023) providing cross-species evidence
that group A bZIP TFs might function as positive regulators of stomatal closure under
drought stress.
Our transcriptome experiment partially explained these aforementioned phenotypic
differences. Under drought stress, mutants showed consistently reduced drought stress-
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
15
induced expression of key regulatory genes compared to wild-type GP. Specifically, HvADF5
expression showed the lowest fold-change in hvbzip33-3, intermediate in hvbzip76, and
highest in wild-type GP (Figure 6C). The above observation is consistent with ADF5's role in
Arabidopsis as a positive regulator of drought -induced stomatal closure, acting downstream
of DPBF transcription factors (Qian et al. , 2019). Similarly, HvIDD14 and HvOST1 , both
known to enhance ABA sensitivity and mediate stomatal responses in Arabidopsis (Mustilli et
al., 2002; Liu et al. , 2022) showed reduced drought induction in both barley mutants (Fig.
6C). The phylogenetic clustering of HvbZIP33 with the DPBF clade supports its role in this
regulatory module.
Collectively, these findings indicate that HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 might increase drought
tolerance by promoting stomatal closure and water conservation through transcriptional
regulation of ABA signaling components. The difference in gs and E was less pronounced
under control conditions than drought stress, s uggesting that the mutations primarily impair
stomatal responsiveness rather than baseline development. However, whether the observed
phenotypes result from altered stomatal movement, changes in stomatal size and density, or
both remains to be determined. Further anatomical and physiological investigation is needed
to distinguish these mechanisms, particularly given that stomata account for over 95% of
plant water loss (Hedrich and Shabala, 2018).
4.3. Transcriptomic redundancy and divergence among wild-type GP, hvbzip33
and hvbzip76 mutants
On a genome-wide scale, the number of DEGs comparing wild-type GP versus hvbzip76 and
hvbzip33-3 was 24-40 times lower than the number of DEGs between control and drought
stress conditions (Figure 6A). The quantitative disparity reveals a crucial mechanistic insight
that DEGs in wild-type GP versus mutants primarily reflect the contribution of a single bZIP
gene. In contrast, the stress versus control co mparison captures parallel pathways regulated
by stress-responsive multi-gene families that extend beyond the genes studied.
GOEA of DEGs between control and drought-s tress conditions revealed that canonical
drought-stress-responsive biological proc esses were commonly enriched across three
genotypes, indicating that fundamental stress -responsive mechanisms are conserved even
in the mutants. Response to water (GO:0009415) was prominently enriched among the
upregulated DEGs (Figure 6B, Figure S9). Protein phosphorylation (GO:0006468),
particularly SnRKs, was similarly enriched among drought-stress-responsive genes,
consistent with the ABA-SnRK2 signaling pathway, wherein ABA-activated SnRK2 kinases
(including SnRK2.6/OST1) phosphorylate multiple downstream targets (Geiger et al. , 2009;
Yoshida et al. , 2010; Yoshida et al. , 2015). The proline biosynthetic process (GO:0006561)
was also enriched among upregulated genes across all three inbreds, confirming that the
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
16
fundamental metabolic capacity for osmotic adjustment through proline accumulation (Handa
et al. , 1986; Szabados and Savouré, 2010; Du et al. , 2023) was also preserved in the
mutants.
However, striking genotype-specific differenc es emerged in other GO term enrichments,
revealing divergent regulatory capacities. For instance, heme-binding (GO:0020037) and
peroxidase activity-related (GO:0004601) were notably enriched among the downregulated
genes in both mutants but not in wild-type GP (Figure 6B, Figure S9). These differences are
functionally relevant because heme-binding proteins, including peroxidases and catalase, are
the critical components of cellular redox homeostasis and antioxidant defense (Foyer and
Noctor, 2005; Eid et al. , 2024). Their downregulation may explain the marginally higher
electrolyte leakage (EL) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content (markers of oxidative stress)
observed in the mutants under drought stress. Most strikingly, the desiccation response GO
term (GO:0009269) was enriched exclusively among the upregulated genes in wild-type GP
(Figure 6B, Figure S9). Such transcriptomic diffe rence suggests a direct or indirect role for
HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 in activating genes that protect cellular structures and
macromolecules during severe water deficit (Yoshida et al. , 2015). The absence of this
enrichment in the mutants represents a critical functional gap in drought tolerance.
Additional genotype-specific patterns included metal ion-related molecular functions: Ca2+ ion
binding (GO:0005509) was universally enriched in the downregulated context, while iron ion
binding (GO:0005506) showed differential enrichm ent patterns across genotypes (Figure 6B,
Figure S9). The downregulation of Ca 2+ binding proteins might indicate a mechanism to
reduce intracellular Ca 2+ buffering capacity, facilitating stomatal closure (You et al. , 2023).
Conversely, metal ion transmembrane trans porter activity (GO:0046873) was enriched
exclusively among downregulated genes in hvbzip33-3 mutant under drought stress. Finally,
the sequence-specific DNA binding process (GO:0043565) showed bidirectional regulation
(both up- and downregulated genes) in wild-type GP, whereas this process was observed
only in the upregulated context in both mutants. Therefore, the transcriptional landscape in
wild-type GP is more balanced, with represent ation of transcription factors that are both
repressed and activated by drought stress. (Figure 6B, Figure S9).
5. Conclusion
The fact that knocking out just two bZIP genes of class A family resulted in significant
physiological changes suggests limited f unctional redundancy among these transcription
factors in barley. Further research to characteri ze the complete family of class A bZIP TFs in
barley and their individual contributions to stomatal regulation will provide a more
comprehensive understanding of this regulator y network. The observation of increased
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
17
stomatal conductance and transpiration rate in barley knockout mutants, particularly under
drought conditions, underscores the critical role of these transcription factors in regulating
plant water relations. By functioning as positiv e regulators of genes involved in stomatal
closure, bZIP transcription factors helped wild-type GP to conserve water during drought.
The delicate balance between carbon assimilation and water conservation, regulated by bZIP
transcription factors, might represent a key aspect of plant adaptation to water-limited
environments, with significant implications for agricultural productivity.
Authors Contribution
AN, JL and AS conceptualized the study. JK, GH and AS created transgenic lines. JB, CS,
THN and AS conducted the experiments. MS, VSB, BS and AS analyzed the data. AS wrote
the manuscript with the input from BS, JK , MS, VSB and AN. AN and JL supervised the
experiment and acquired the funding for the research.
Acknowledgement
The authors are grateful to Josef Bauer, Jö rg Nettekoven and Thomas Gerhardt from the
University of Bonn, who organized logistics for greenhouse experiments. We would also like
to thank Sabine Sommerfeld (Plant Reproductive Biology, IPK) for excellent technical
support. We also appreciate de.NBI for providing the cloud computing platform. The
Graduate School GRK2064 was supported by funding from the German Research
Foundation and core funding from the Julius Kühn Institute provided the necessary financial
support for the research. Authors acknowledge the use of the Grammarly plug-in to prevent
grammatical mistakes.
Data Availability
The raw sequencing reads from the RNA-seq experiment are available under project
PRJEB105244 (accession ID: ERA35397371) in the European Nucleotide Archive. The
processed, normalized read-count data are pr ovided as supplementary data. All phenotype
data are presented in graphs and tables, and the raw data will also be made available upon
request to the corresponding authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
18
References
Agarwal P, Baranwal VK, Khurana P. 2019. Genome-wide Analysis of bZIP Transcription
Factors in wheat and Functional Characterization of a TabZIP under Abiotic Stress.
Scientific reports 9, 4608.
Alonso R, Oñate-Sánchez L, Weltmeier F et al. 2009. A pivotal role of the basic leucine
zipper transcription factor bZIP53 in the regulation of Arabidopsis seed maturation gene
expression based on heterodimerization and protein complex formation. The Plant cell
21, 1747–1761.
Al-Sayaydeh R, Ayad J, Harwood W, Al-Abdallat AM. 2024. Stress-Inducible Expression
of HvABF2 Transcription Factor Improves Water Deficit Tolerance in Transgenic Barley
Plants. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) 13.
Amir Hossain M, Lee Y, Cho J-I et al. 2010. The bZIP transcription factor OsABF1 is an
ABA responsive element binding factor that enhances abiotic stress signaling in rice.
Plant molecular biology 72, 557–566.
Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data.
http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and
Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B:
Statistical Methodology 57, 289–300.
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina
sequence data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 30, 2114–2120.
Cao X, Costa LM, Biderre-Petit C et al. 2007. Abscisic acid and stress signals induce
Viviparous1 expression in seed and vegetative tissues of maize. Plant physiology 143,
720–731
.
Casaretto J, Ho T-HD. 2003. The transcription factors HvABI5 and HvVP1 are required for
the abscisic acid induction of gene expression in barley aleurone cells. The Plant cell 15,
271–284.
Chang H-C, Tsai M-C, Wu S-S, Chang I-F. 2019. Regulation of ABI5 expression by ABF3
during salt stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Botanical studies 60, 16.
Chen Y, Lun ATL, Smyth GK. 2016. From reads to genes to pathways: differential
expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments using Rsubread and the edgeR quasi-
likelihood pipeline. F1000Research 5, 1438.
Choi H, Hong J, Ha J, Kang J, Kim SY. 2000. ABFs, a family of ABA-responsive element
binding factors. The Journal of biological chemistry 275, 1723–1730.
Choi J, Lim CW, Lee SC. 2025. Role of pepper bZIP transcription factor CaADBZ1 in
abscisic acid signalling and drought stress response. Physiologia plantarum 177, e70159.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
19
Chuxin W, Chengchao Z, Yu Z et al. 2021. OsbZIP09, a Unique OsbZIP Transcription
Factor of Rice, Promotes Rather Than Suppresses Seed Germination by Attenuating
Abscisic Acid Pathway. Rice Science 28, 358–367.
Dhatterwal P, Sharma N, Prasad M. 2024. Decoding the functionality of plant transcription
factors. Journal of experimental botany 75, 4745–4759.
Du L, Huang X, Ding L et al. 2023. TaERF87 and TaAKS1 synergistically regulate
TaP5CS1/TaP5CR1-mediated proline biosynthesis to enhance drought tolerance in
wheat. The New phytologist 237, 232–250.
Dziwornu AK, Shrestha A, Matthus E, Ali B, Wu L-B, Frei M. 2018. Responses of
contrasting rice genotypes to excess manganese and their implications for lignin
synthesis. Plant physiology and biochemistry PPB 123, 252–259.
Eid M, Barayeu U, Sulková K, Aranda-Vallejo C, Dick TP. 2024. Using the heme
peroxidase APEX2 to probe intracellular H2O2 flux and diffusion. Nature communications
15, 1239.
Foyer CH, Noctor G. 2005. Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: a metabolic
interface between stress perception and physiological responses. The Plant cell 17,
1866–1875.
Fujita Y, Fujita M, Satoh R et al. 2005. AREB1 is a transcription activator of novel ABRE-
dependen
t ABA signaling that enhances drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. The
Plant cell 17, 3470–3488.
Geiger D, Scherzer S, Mumm P et al. 2009. Activity of guard cell anion channel SLAC1 is
controlled by drought-stress signaling kinase-phosphatase pair. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 21425–21430.
Gómez-Cadenas A, Verhey SD, Holappa LD, Shen Q, Ho TH, Walker-Simmons MK.
1999. An abscisic acid-induced protein kinase, PKABA1, mediates abscisic acid-
suppressed gene expression in barley aleurone layers. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96, 1767–1772.
Handa S, Handa AK, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA. 1986. Proline accumulation and the
adaptation of cultured plant cells to water stress. Plant physiology 80, 938–945.
He L, Wu Z, Wang X et al. 2024. A novel maize F-bZIP member, ZmbZIP76, functions as a
positive regulator in ABA-mediated abiotic stress tolerance by binding to ACGT-
containing elements. Plant science an international journal of experimental plant biology
341, 111952.
Hedrich R, Shabala S. 2018. Stomata in a saline world. Current opinion in plant biology 46,
87–95.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
20
Hobo T, Asada M, Kowyama Y, Hattori T. 1999. ACGT-containing abscisic acid response
element (ABRE) and coupling element 3 (CE3) are functionally equivalent. The Plant
journal for cell and molecular biology 19, 679–689.
Hodges DM, DeLong JM, Forney CF, Prange RK. 1999. Improving the thiobarbituric acid-
reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing
anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta 207, 604–611.
Hossain MA, Cho J-I, Han M et al. 2010. The ABRE-binding bZIP transcription factor
OsABF2 is a positive regulator of abiotic stress and ABA signaling in rice. Journal of plant
physiology 167, 1512–1520.
Huang X-S, Liu J-H, Chen X-J. 2010. Overexpression of PtrABF gene, a bZIP transcription
factor isolated from Poncirus trifoliata, enhances dehydration and drought tolerance in
tobacco via scavenging ROS and modulating expression of stress-responsive genes.
BMC plant biology 10, 230.
Jakoby M, Weisshaar B, Dröge-Laser W et al. 2002. bZIP transcription factors in
Arabidopsis. Trends in plant science 7, 106–111.
Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y et al. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function
classification. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 30, 1236–1240.
Kaur R, Sharma N, Jain P, Verma M, Apkari A, Rishi V. 2025. Mapping the dimerization
specificity of bZIP transcription factors in bread wheat.
Klopfenstein DV, Zhang L, Pedersen BS et al. 2018. GOATOOLS: A Python library for
Gene Ontology analyses. Scientific reports 8, 10872.
Leng G, Hall J. 2019. Crop yield sensitivity of global major agricultural countries to droughts
and the projected changes in the future. The Science of the total environment 654, 811–
821.
Li M, Yao T, Lin W et al. 2023. Double DAP-seq uncovered synergistic DNA binding of
interacting bZIP transcription factors. Nature communications 14, 2600.
Li X, Feng B, Zhang F et al. 2016. Bioinformatic Analyses of Subgroup-A Members of the
Wheat bZIP Transcription Factor Family and Functional Identification of TabZIP174
Involved in Drought Stress Response. Frontiers in plant science 7, 1643.
Liu C, Mao B, Ou S et al. 2014. OsbZIP71, a bZIP transcription factor, confers salinity and
drought tolerance in rice. Plant molecular biology 84, 19–36.
Liu J, Shu D, Tan Z et al. 2022. The Arabidopsis IDD14 transcription factor interacts with
bZIP-type ABFs/AREBs and cooperatively regulates ABA-mediated drought tolerance.
The New phytologist 236, 929–942.
Lopez-Molina L, Mongrand S, Kinoshita N, Chua N-H. 2003. AFP is a novel negative
regulator of ABA signaling that promotes ABI5 protein degradation. Genes &
development 17, 410–418.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
21
Marthe C, Kumlehn J, Hensel G. 2015. Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) transformation using
immature embryos, Third edition. New York: Humana Press.
Mendes A, Kelly AA, van Erp H et al. 2013. bZIP67 regulates the omega-3 fatty acid
content of Arabidopsis seed oil by activating fatty acid desaturase3. The Plant cell 25,
3104–3116.
Mustilli A-C, Merlot S, Vavasseur A, Fenzi F, Giraudat J. 2002. Arabidopsis OST1 protein
kinase mediates the regulation of stomatal aperture by abscisic acid and acts upstream of
reactive oxygen species production. The Plant cell 14, 3089–3099.
Nakashima K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. 2025. Transcriptional gene network
involved in drought stress response: application for crop breeding in the context of climate
change. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological
sciences 380, 20240236.
Nijhawan A, Jain M, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP. 2008. Genomic survey and gene expression
analysis of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family in rice. Plant physiology
146, 333–350.
Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea GM, Leek JT, Salzberg SL. 2016. Transcript-level expression
analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nature protocols
11, 1650–1667.
Pourabed E, Ghane Golmohamadi F, Soleymani Monfared P, Razavi SM, Shobbar Z-S.
2015. Basic leucine zipper family in barley: genome-wide characterization of members
and expression analysis. Molecular biotechnology 57, 12–26.
Qian D, Zhang Z, He J et al. 2019. Arabidopsis ADF5 promotes stomatal closure by
regulating actin cytoskeleton remodeling in response to ABA and drought stress. Journal
of experimental botany 70, 435–446.
Roychoudhury A, Sengupta DN. 2009. The promoter-elements of some abiotic stress-
inducible genes from cereals interact with a nuclear protein from tobacco. Biologia
plantarum 53, 583–587.
Schoonheim PJ, Costa Pereira DDA, Boer AH de. 2009. Dual role for 14-3-3 proteins and
ABF transcription factors in gibberellic acid and abscisic acid signalling in barley
(Hordeum vulgare) aleurone cells. Plant, cell & environment 32, 439–447.
Schoonheim PJ, Sinnige MP, Casaretto JA et al. 2007. 14-3-3 adaptor proteins are
intermediates in ABA signal transduction during barley seed germination. The Plant
journal for cell and molecular biology 49, 289–301.
Seller CA, Schroeder JI. 2023. Distinct guard cell-specific remodeling of chromatin
accessibility during abscisic acid- and CO2-dependent stomatal regulation. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 120, e2310670120.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
22
Shen Q, Ho TH. 1995. Functional dissection of an abscisic acid (ABA)-inducible gene
reveals two independent ABA-responsive complexes each containing a G-box and a
novel cis-acting element. The Plant cell 7, 295–307.
Shen Q, Uknes SJ, Ho TH. 1993. Hormone response complex in a novel abscisic acid and
cycloheximide-inducible barley gene. Journal of Biological Chemistry 268, 23652–23660.
Shen Q, Zhang P, Ho TH. 1996. Modular nature of abscisic acid (ABA) response
complexes: composite promoter units that are necessary and sufficient for ABA induction
of gene expression in barley. The Plant cell 8, 1107–1119.
Shen QJ, Casaretto JA, Zhang P, Ho T-HD. 2004. Functional definition of ABA-response
complexes: the promoter units necessary and sufficient for ABA induction of gene
expression in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant molecular biology 54, 111–124.
Shrestha A, Fendel A, Nguyen TH et al. 2022. Natural diversity uncovers P5CS1 regulation
and its role in drought stress tolerance and yield sustainability in barley. Plant, cell &
environment 45, 3523–3536.
Szabados L, Savouré A. 2010. Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends in plant
science 15, 89–97.
Tang N, Zhang H, Li X, Xiao J, Xiong L. 2012. Constitutive activation of transcription factor
OsbZIP46 improves drought tolerance in rice. P lant physiology 158, 1755–1768.
Uno Y, Furihata T, Abe H, Yoshida R, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. 2000.
Arabidopsis basic leucine zipper transcription factors involved in an abscisic acid-
dependent signal transduction pathway under drought and high-salinity conditions.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97,
11632–11637.
van Leene J, Blomme J, Kulkarni SR et al. 2016. Functional characterization of the
Arabidopsis transcription factor bZIP29 reveals its role in leaf and root development.
Journal of experimental botany 67, 5825–5840.
Wang Z, Su G, Li M et al. 2016. Overexpressing Arabidopsis ABF3 increases tolerance to
multiple abiotic stresses and reduces leaf size in alfalfa. Plant physiology and
biochemistry PPB 109, 199–208.
Wei K, Chen J, Wang Y et al. 2012. Genome-wide analysis of bZIP-encoding genes in
maize. DNA research an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes
and genomes 19, 463–476.
Xiang Y, Tang N, Du H, Ye H, Xiong L. 2008. Characterization of OsbZIP23 as a key player
of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family for conferring abscisic acid sensitivity
and salinity and drought tolerance in rice. Plant physiology 148, 1938–1952.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
23
Yang J, Wang M, Li W et al. 2019. Reducing expression of a nitrate-responsive bZIP
transcription factor increases grain yield and N use in wheat. Plant biotechnology journal
17, 1823–1833.
Yoshida T, Fujita Y, Maruyama K et al. 2015. Four Arabidopsis AREB/ABF transcription
factors function predominantly in gene expression downstream of SnRK2 kinases in
abscisic acid signalling in response to osmotic stress. Plant, cell & environment 38, 35–
49.
Yoshida T, Fujita Y, Sayama H et al. 2010. AREB1, AREB2, and ABF3 are master
transcription factors that cooperatively regulate ABRE-dependent ABA signaling involved
in drought stress tolerance and require ABA for full activation. The Plant journal for cell
and molecular biology 61, 672–685.
You Z, Guo S, Li Q et al. 2023. The CBL1/9-CIPK1 calcium sensor negatively regulates
drought stress by phosphorylating the PYLs ABA receptor. Nature communications 14,
5886.
Zhang C, Li C, Liu J et al. 2017. The OsABF1 transcription factor improves drought
tolerance by activating the transcription of COR413-TM1 in rice. Journal of experimental
botany 68, 4695–4707.
Zhong X, Feng X, Li Y et al. 2021. Genome-wide identification of bZIP transcription factor
genes related to starch synthesis in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Genome 64, 1067–
1080.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
Traits Genotype Treatment Genotype:Treatment Treatment:Repitition Treatment:DAS
Ci *** *** ns *** ***
A ns *** ns *** ***
gs *** *** ns *** ***
E *** *** ns ** ***
iWUE *** *** * ns ns
RWC (%) ** *** * *** ***
MDA (mg g-1) ns *** ns NA ***
EL (%) ** *** * *** ***
Plant height (cm) *** *** ns ns NA
Shoot fresh weight (g) *** *** ns *** NA
Shoot dry weight (g) ns * ns ns NA
Table 1: Analysis of variance in physiological and morphological traits evaluated under control and drought conditions. Drought stress was imposed on
14-day-old seedlings via controlled dehydration, resulting in a uniform water loss across all experimental units. Photosynthetic and physiological traits
were evaluated 3, 6, and 9 days after the start of the stress treatment (DAS). Morphological data were collected at the end of the experiment, 9 days
after stress. Asterisks indicate level of significance (***, p ≤ 0.001; **, p ≤ 0.01 *, p ≤ 0.05, not significant (ns), p > 0.05). The experiment was repeated
twice (Repetition), with four to six biological replicates per repetition. Abbreviation: not applicable (NA).
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 1: Mutation even in the coding sequence of HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76. Insertion and deletion mutations were detected in (A) HvbZIP33 and (B)
HvbZIP76 in genome editing pipelines using the RNA-guided Cas9 endonuclease. The rectangular boxes are the exons; the green and blue regions
represent conserved domains. The black triangle indicates the site of mutation.
A
B
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 2: Morphological parameters evaluated under control and drought conditions in Golden Promise (GP) and mutants. The effect of drought stress
on (A) plant height, (B) shoot fresh weight, and (C) shoot dry weight. Drought stress was imposed on 14-day-old seedlings via controlled dehydration,
ensuring uniform water loss across all experimental units. The morphological evaluation was performed 9 days after the start of stress treatment. Two
independent experiments were performed. Each experiment comprised four biological replications per genotype per treatment. The bar represents
mean ± standard error (n = 8 to 12). Indexed letter represents significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between the genotypes using the LSD multiple mean
comparison test.
A B C
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
A
B
Figure 3: Foliar relative water content evaluated under control and drought conditions in Golden Promise (GP) and mutants. (A) The effect of drought stress on
Golden promise (GP) and hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 mutants 7 days after stress (DAS). White scale bar corresponds to a length of 8 cm. (B) Relative water content
in the first fully expanded leaf from the top at 3, 6 and 9 days after the start of stress treatment (DAS). Drought stress was imposed on 14-day-old seedlings via
controlled dehydration, resulting in a uniform water loss across all experimental units. The bar represents mean ± standard error (n = 8 to 12). Indexed letter
represents significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between the genotypes using the LSD multiple mean comparison test.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 4: Gas exchange parameters evaluated under control and drought conditions in wild-type Golden Promise (GP) and mutants. The effect of drought stress on
(A) stomatal conductance (gs), (B) transpiration rate (E), (C) CO2 assimilation (A) and (D) intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE). Drought stress was imposed on 14-
day-old seedlings via controlled dehydration, ensuring uniform water loss across all experimental units. First gas exchange parameters were evaluated at 3 days
after the start of stress treatment (DAS) on the first fully expanded leaf from the top. It was then measured again on 6 and 9 DAS on the same leaf. Two
independent experiments were performed. Each experiment comprised four to five biological replications per genotype per treatment. The bar represents mean ±
standard error (n = 8-12). Indexed letter represents significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between the genotypes using the LSD multiple mean comparison test.
A B
DC
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 5: Principal component (PC) analysis of transcriptome profile of GP, hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76. (A-C) The variance explained by PC1, PC2, PC3, and PC4 on
the global gene expression profile of GP, hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76 under control and drought stress. (D) The correlation between PCs and the experimental factors
(genotype and growth condition). Asterisks indicate a statistically significant correlation coefficient.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
A
B
C
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 6: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for control versus drought comparison among GP and mutants. (A) Venn diagram illustrating the number of DEGs
representing core drought-induced response genes, possible overlapping targets and unique to HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76. (B) Gene ontology classification and
enrichment analysis. The circle’s size indicates the number of genes. The color indicates the -log10 transformation of the false-discovery-rate p-value. (C) Heat
map of fold change (control vs drought) of barley orthologs of genes known to be associated with stomata movement in Arabidopsis and rice. Red and blue color
indicate the high and low fold change, respectively under drought compared to control conditions.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.