HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 have overlapping roles in foliar transpiration in drought-stressed barley

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Basic leucine zippers (bZIP) constitute one of the biggest protein families and evolutionarily conserved transcription factors (TFs) in plants. We obtained mutant lines for two bZIP TFs, HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 , in the genetic background of the barley cultivar Golden Promise (GP) via targeted gene-specific mutagenesis using an RNA-guided Cas9 endonuclease. A comprehensive morphological, physiological and transcriptomic analysis was performed in wild-type GP compared with hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 mutants under drought stress. The morphological and physiological changes were similar in both mutants and in the wild-type GP. Most strikingly, the mutants exhibited accelerated wilting and increased water loss. This effect was primarily caused by higher stomatal conductance ( g s ) and transpiration rate ( E ) in mutants compared to wild-type GP under both control and drought conditions, which in turn had a detrimental effect on the mutants’ intrinsic water use efficiency ( iWUE ). Likewise, the transcriptome profiles of hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 were more similar to each other than those of wild-type GP. We found that the number of differentially regulated genes under control versus drought-stress conditions was higher in the mutants than in wild-type GP, suggesting that the mutants try to compensate for accelerated foliar water loss. The study highlights the essential roles of HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 in balancing water loss in barley. These findings provide a foundation for engineering enhanced drought tolerance in barley through targeted manipulation of these genes to optimize transpiration rates.
Full text 74,074 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Basic leucine zippers (bZIP) constitute one of the biggest protein families and evolutionarily conserved transcription factors (TFs) in plants. We obtained mutant lines for two bZIP TFs, HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76, in the genetic background of the barley cultivar Golden Promise (GP) via targeted gene-specific mutagenesi s using an RNA-guided Cas9 endonuclease. A comprehensive morphological, physiological and transcriptomic analysis was performed in wild-type GP compared with hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 mutants under drought stress. The morphological and physiological changes were similar in both mutants and in the wild-type GP. Most strikingly, the mutants exhibited accelerated wilting and increased water loss. This effect was primarily caused by higher stomatal conductance ( g s) and transpiration rate ( E) in mutants compared to wild-type GP under both control and drought conditions, which in turn had a detrimental effect on the mutants’ intrinsic water use efficiency ( iWUE). Likewise, the transcriptome profiles of hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 were more similar to each other than those of wild-type GP. We found that the number of differentially regulated genes under control versus drought-stress conditions was higher in the mutants than in wild-type GP, suggesting that the mutants try to compensate for accelerated foliar water loss. The study highlights the essential roles of HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 in balancing water loss in barley. These findings provide a foundation for engineering enhanced drought tolerance in barley through targeted manipulation of these genes to optimize transpiration rates. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 3 1. Introduction Drought stress is one of the most significant challenges of food production in the current context of climate uncertainty (Leng and Hall, 2019). Hence, drought stress tolerance is also one of the widely researched topics in plant science and it is now well established that tolerance mechanisms involve a complex interaction of multiple gene regulatory processes (Nakashima et al. , 2025). Transcription factors (TFs) ar e central to these gene expression networks that connect drought signaling to stress-responsive genes to determine optimal physiological, biochemical and growth adjustments (Dhatterwal et al. , 2024). Among them, the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) family is one of the most prominent and evolutionarily conserved TF families in plants. bZIP TFs have two conserved domains, namely a basic region and a leucine zipper domain (Jakoby et al. , 2002). The basic region is highly conserved and facilitates the binding of bZIP proteins to specific DNA sequences, typically containing a core ACGT motif, such as G-box (C ACGTG), C-box (C ACGTC) and A-box (TACGTA) sequences (Li et al. , 2023). Beyond these ACGT-core motifs, the potential non- ACGT targets of bZIP proteins are also identif ied in cereals and are referred to as coupling element 1 (CE1, CCACCG) (Shen and Ho, 1995; Shen et al. , 1996; Roychoudhury and Sengupta, 2009) and CE3 (CGTGTC) (Hobo et al. , 1999). The leucine zipper region is another conserved binding domain t hat is characterized by leucine residues, which facilitate the formation of homo- or heterodimers with different members of the bZIP family proteins (Kaur et al. , 2025). This modular architecture of bZIP TFs highlights their versatility in regulating a wide range of biological processes in plants. Ten groups of bZIP proteins (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I and S) have been described for Arabidopsis and members of the group A are invo lved in responses to abiotic stresses, including drought, cold and salinity tolerance (Fujita et al., 2005; Yoshida et al., 2015; Chang et al., 2019). They are usually referred to as ABA-responsive element (ABRE)-binding TFs (ABFs). Among them, the binding property of four ABFs (ABF1, AREB1/ ABF2, ABF3 and AREB2/ ABF4) to ABREs was identified through yeast one-hybrid screening and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (Choi et al. , 2000; Uno et al. , 2000). These four respective genes are highly expressed in vegetative tissue and their expression is significantly induced by abiotic stress (Yoshida et al. , 2010; Yoshida et al. , 2015). Over- expression lines of ABFs showed enhanced stress adaptation while the knockout lines were sensitive to drought stress in several plant species, including Arabidopsis (Fujita et al., 2005; Yoshida et al. , 2010; Hossain et al. , 2010; Huang et al. , 2010; Amir Hossain et al. , 2010; Yoshida et al. , 2015; Wang et al. , 2016). Four other genes from the AREB family (ABI5/DPBF1, DPBF2, AREB3/DPBF3 and DPBF4 ) have more specialized expression patterns. Among the four DPBF g enes, DPBF1 is expressed in roots, leaves and .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 4 reproductive tissues, while DPBF2 expression is strictly specific to seeds. DPBF3 shows lower overall expression across tissues and growth conditions than other DPBF genes. Unlike stress-inducible ABFs, the four DPBFs are involved in seed germination, seed maturation, floral development and the regulation of energy homeostasis (Nijhawan et al. , 2008; Alonso et al., 2009; van Leene et al., 2016). Despite the importance of group A bZIP TFs in stress adaptation and plant development, a comprehensive understanding of their functional diversity and the regulatory networks that govern their actions remains incomplete. This is especially valid for barley and concerns both the downstream target genes they activate and the upstream signals that modulate their expression and activity. For instance, the roles of some genes of the ABF and DPBF class of bZIP TFs were studied in rice, wheat and maize (Xiang et al. , 2008; Hossain et al. , 2010; Tang et al., 2012; Wei et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2014; Zhang et al. , 2017; He et al., 2024). For example, multiple bZIP TFs in rice, namely, OsABF2, OsbZIP23, OsbZIP46, OsbZIP71 and OsbZIP72, act as positive regulators of drought and salt tolerance by integrating ABA signaling. Likewise, bZIP genes in wheat (sub-group A) conferred abiotic stress tolerance when over-expressed in Arabidopsis ( Traes_7AL_25850F96F.1, TabZIP174), as well as nitrogen use efficiency (TabZIP60) in wheat (Li et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2019; Agarwal et al., 2019). To date, only one group A bZIP gene has been functionally characterized in barley. Recent studies showed that constitutive overexpression of HvbZIP77 in Arabidopsis enhanced drought tolerance but reduced seed size (Al-Sayaydeh et al., 2024). From the genome-wide identification of bZIP genes in barley, it was concluded that they belong to a large family with 89 and 92 genes, as reported for the Morex genome versions 1 (Pourabed et al., 2015) and 2 (Zhong et al., 2021), respectively. These members of the bZIP family were grouped into ten clusters (A-I and S) based on the gene structure and expression pattern. Although these studies provided a comp rehensive catalog and classification of bZIP genes in barley, their biological roles remain largely unexplored. Previous evidence from promoter activation assays in barley and ot her cereals suggests that group A bZIP transcription factors ( HvABI5/HvbZIP56, HvABF1/ HvbZIP33, HvABF2/ HvbZIP77 and HvABF3/ HvbZIP52) may act as positive regulators of ABA-responsive genes. For example, minimal promoter regions of HVA22 containing an ABA-responsive complex (ABRC) composed of ACGT-ABRE, CE3 and C E1 have been shown to drive ABA-dependent reporter expression in barley (Shen et al., 1993; Shen and Ho, 1995; Gómez-Cadenas et al., 1999; Casaretto and Ho, 2003; Shen et al., 2004; Cao et al., 2007). Later, Schoonheim et al. (2009) showed that ectopic expression in alurone cells co-transfected with ABF1/ABF3 and ABRC:GUS was sufficient to transactivate GUS even without ABA application. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 5 Nonetheless, the functional significance of most bZIP TFs in barley remains unknown. This research aimed to identify and characterize bZIP TFs in barley using a combination of bioinformatics approaches and experimental validation. We employed Cas9-mediated genome editing to create potential loss-of-function mutants of two bZIP TFs in barley. Subsequently, the mutant lines were phenotyped under drought-stress and control conditions at the seedling stage. A comprehensive RNA-seq analysis was performed to profile the transcriptomes of mutant lines for two bZIP TFs under drought stress to identify their downstream target genes. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 6 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Selection of bZIP transcription factors for functional studies In the first step, we compared the bZIP genes annotated in the barley reference genome (Morex V3) with those present in Morex V2 (Zhong et al. , 2021). Because the goal was to identify barley homologs of AREBs (class A bZIP family proteins) from Arabidopsis, we aligned the protein sequence of the HvbZIPs in the Morex V3 sequence and nine AREBs (class A bZIP family proteins) from Arabidopsis using the “msa” package in R. The protein alignment file was used as input to constr uct the phylogenetic tree using the “phytools” package in R. Among the genes that clustered together with Arabidopsis AREBs, we selected HORVU.MOREX.r3.6HG0619650, HvbZIP76 and HORVU.MOREX.r3.3HG0300770, HvbZIP33 for functional validation based on prior information on those genes (Figure S1). We selected a target motif in exon 1 of HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 (Figure 1). The respective gRNA was synthesized and inserted into pSH91 using a restriction enzyme ( BsaI). The validated clones were digested with SfiI and the gRNA and Cas9-containing fragment was transferred to the generic binary vector p6I D35STE9 (DNA Cloning Service, Hamburg), which carries hpt for plant selection. Immature embryos of barley inbred Golden Promise (GP) were used for Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer according to (Marthe et al., 2015). 2.2. Genotyping the T0, T1 and T2 generation Mutation events in T0 progenies were detected by Sanger sequencing at both the target and predicted off-target sites. Subsequently, 48 T 1 progenies from T 0 plants that exhibited mutation events were screened for T-DNA. T 1 progeny from each selected T 0 line that tested negative for T-DNA insertion were sequenced to detect homozygous mutation events. The positive T1 progeny for mutation events were selfed to obtain T 2 seeds. Finally, T2 progenies were again genotyped for the absence of T-DNA as a confirmation and sequenced to identify transgene-free T 2 plants that are homozygous for mutation events in the target genes. Verified T2 progenies were self-pollinated to obtai n seeds from individuals homozygous for mutant alleles, enabling characterization of the mutants under drought stress. The mutant lines for HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 are referred to as hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 in the following text. 2.3. Plant growth conditions and drought treatment Seeds were pregerminated using a peat-based po tting mixture, ED73 classic, produced and marketed by Einheitserde, Germany and two-day-old seedlings were transferred to a pot (8 x 8 x 7 cm). The pots were filled with an equal volume of mixture containing 60% natural sand and 40% topsoil (Terrasoil; Cordel and Sohn). The plants were grown in the greenhouse .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 7 under the following conditions: a daily mean temperature of 18-22°C, a 14/10 h light/dark cycle and a light intensity of 110-150 μ mol m -2 s -1. The field capacity of the soil was maintained at 80% under control conditions. Pots were weighed twice a day and manually watered to maintain a constant soil moisture level. Drought stress was induced by withholding water from 14-day-old seedlings. T he weight of the pots was recorded daily to ensure a consistent moisture level in all pots. 2.4. Tissue water status and oxidative stress marker evaluation Relative water content (RWC) and electrolyt e leakage (EL) were evaluated according to (Shrestha et al., 2022). First, the tip of the first fully expanded leaf from the top was removed. Then, two leaf sections (around 2 cm each) were detached from the first fully expanded leaf and the fresh weight was recorded (FW). Subsequently, the leaf sections were dipped into centrifuge tubes containing 10 ml of deionized water and incubated at room temperature for 24 h. The leaf sections were removed from the centrifuge tube and excess water was gently wiped away with a paper towel before measuring t he turgor weight (TW). The dry weight was recorded after the sample was oven-dried at 70°C for 72 hours. RWC was estimated as (FW- DW)/(TW-DW) *100. For EL measurement, centrifuge tubes were filled with 10 mL of deionized water and the initial electrical conductivity (ECi) was recorded . Then, two leaf sections (approximately 2 cm each) from the same leaf used for RWC were excised and placed in a centrifuge tube containing 10 mL of double-distilled water. The tubes were stored in the dark at room temperature. Electrical conductivity was me asured after a 24 h rehydration period (ECf). After the final reading, the samples were boiled at 100°C for 30 minutes, cooled to room temperature and the total electrical conductivity (ECt) was measured. EL was expressed as (ECf-ECi)/(ECt-ECi)*100. Oxidative damage to the lipid membrane duri ng drought was estimated by determining the malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration using the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) method (Hodges et al., 1999), adapted to a microplate-based protocol (Dziwornu et al. , 2018) with some modifications. Shoot samples were homogenized in liquid nitrogen and MDA was extracted with 1.5 ml of 0.1% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), followed by centrifuging at 14,000 g for 15 minutes at 4°C. Then, 500 μ L of supernatant was mixed with reaction solution I (0.01% 2,6- di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) in 20% TCA) and reaction solution II (0.65% TBA, 0.01% BHT in 20% TCA) in a 1:1 ratio. Reaction and sample mix were incubated at 95°C for 30 minutes. The reaction was stopped on ice for five minutes and the mixture was centrifuged at 8000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The absorbance was measured at 440 nm, 532 nm and 600 nm using a microplate reader (TECAN Infinite 200 Pro, TECAN Group Limited, Switzerland). MDA concentration was expressed as nanomoles per gram fresh weight. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 8 2.5. Gas exchange experiment Gas exchange was measured using a portable photosynthesis system (LI-6400XT gas exchange analyzer; LI-COR Biosciences) 3, 6 and 9 days after the start of the drought stress treatment (DAS). The measurements were made on the first fully expanded leaves from the top at 3 DAS (three true leaves fully expanded). Subsequently, measurements were made at 6 and 9 DAS on the same leaf for all plants in each treatment to minimize leaf effects. The parameters inside the leaf chamber were set to a saturated photosynthetic active radiation of 1500 μ mol m−2 s−1, a relative humidity of approximately 52%, a temperature corresponding to the leaf temperature and a flow rate of 400 μ mol s −1. The infrared gas exchange analyzer automatically logs the photosynthetic parameters, including the rate of CO 2 assimilation ( A), intercellular CO2 (Ci), stomatal conductance ( gs) and transpiration rate ( E). All observations were adjusted to 25°C. The experiment was performed twice, with four biological replications per genotype per treatment (i.e., eight plants). 2.6. Data processing and statistical analysis Statistical significance was assessed using open-access statistical computing software R, version 4.3.1. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for physiological and photosynthetic traits was performed using the following model /g1877 /g3036/g3037/g3038/g3039/g3040/g3404 μ /g3397/g1833 /g3036/g3397/g1846 /g3037/g3397/g4666 /g1833 :/g1846 /g4667 /g3036/g3037/g3397/g4666 /g1846 :/g1844 /g4667 /g3037/g3038/g3397 /g4666 /g1846: /g1830/g1827/g1845 /g4667 /g3037/g3040/g3397/g2013 /g3036/g3037/g3038/g3039, where /g1877 /g3036/g3037/g3038/g3039/g3040was the phenotypic observation, /g4666μ ) the general mean, ( /g1833 /g3036) the effect of genotype, (/g1846 /g3037) the effect of treatment, /g4666/g1833: /g1846/g4667 /g3036/g3037 the effect of genotype by treatment interaction, /g4666/g1846: /g1844/g4667 /g3037/g3038 the effect of the experiment nested within treatment, /g4666 /g1846: /g1830/g1827/g1845 /g4667 /g3037/g3039 effect of days after the start of stress nested within treatment and ( /g2013 /g3036/g3037/g3038/g3039) the error term. Because plant biomass was only estimated at 9 DAS, the ANOVA was performed for this character using the above equation without /g4666 /g1846: /g1830/g1827/g1845 /g4667 /g3037/g3039 effect. Adjusted entry means and standard errors of means were estimated using the “emmean” package in R. Multiple mean comparisons were performed using the LSD test. 2.7. RNAseq analysis of hvbzip76 and hvbzip33 under drought stress We profiled the transcriptomes of GP, hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76 under both control and drought stress conditions. The growing environm ent and stress treatment were identical to those described previously for the physiological experiments. Fresh shoot samples were collected 7 DAS, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C before RNA extraction. Shoot materials were homogenized in liquid nitrogen, and RNA was extracted using the Monarch RNA Miniprep Kit (New England Biolabs, USA) according to the manufacturer’s .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 9 instructions. The RNA concentration and quality were determined by electrophoresis on a 1% Agarose gel and by NanoDrop (NanoDrop 2000c, T hermo Fisher Scientific, USA) before shipping. RNA integrity was further verified by using a Bioanalyzer (Agilent 2100, Agilent Technologies, USA). The samples that passed the RNA integrity check (with an integrity value of ≥ 6.3) were used for library preparation. Novogen Europe performed library preparation and sequencing. We obtained the paired-end read sequence and the quality control of raw sequencing reads was performed using FastQC (Andrews, 2010). Then, the adaptor sequence and reads less than 70 bp were trimmed using Trimmomatic (Bolger et al. , 2014). Trimmed reads were aligned to the barley reference genome sequence (https://data.jgi.doe.gov/refine- download/phytozome?organism=HvulgareMorex&expanded=Phytozome-702) using HISAT2 (Pertea et al. , 2016). The unmapped reads were filtered before further processing. To be selected as a mapped read, ≥ 80% of the length of a read should have mapped to the

Reference

sequence sharing /i3≥/i3 90% identity. On average, more than 80% of the trimmed reads mapped to the reference. Differential gene expression (DEG) analysis was performed using the edgeR package (Chen et al. , 2016). First, the read count for uniquely mapped sequences was normalized to the sample's sequencing depth and expressed as log counts per million mapped reads. A negative binomial distribution was fitted prior to DEG estimation using the log2 fold change in read counts for the drought treatment relative to the control. Quasi-likelihood F-test was applied and P ≤ 0.05 was set as a significance threshold (Chen et al., 2016). Multiple testing correction was performed for the significant DEGs list to control the false discovery rate to P ≤ 0.05, according to (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis (G OEA) for DEGs was performed using goatools v1.4.12 (Klopfenstein et al. , 2018) to identify the enriched GO terms. For this analysis, we annotated the whole proteome of Morex using InterProScan5 (Jones et al. , 2014). We used the GO annotation of the entire barley proteome as a background set in GOEA. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 10 3. Results 3.1. Mutation events in HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 Recently, (Zhong et al. , 2021) showed that the Morex genome (version 2) comprises 92 HvbZIP genes. We identified five additional members beyond those listed by (Zhong et al. , 2021) in the Morex reference version 3 (Table S1). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that 18 HvbZIP TFs belong to group A bZIP proteins, eight more than those reported for Arabidopsis. The 18 genes of group A can be assigned to four sub-clusters: ABF1-ABF4-like sub-cluster, DPBF3-DPBF4-like sub-cluster, DPBF1-DPBF2- like sub-cluster and bZIP15-like sub-cluster (Figure S1). The first sub-cluster of gr oup A bZIPs that branched alongside ABF1-ABF4 comprised four genes: HvbZIP56, HvbZIP76, HvbZIP77 and HvbZIP96 . Four HvbZIPs, including HvbZIP33, clustered alongside the DPBF1-DPBF2-like sub-cluster. HvbZIP30 and HvbZIP07 were the closest barely proteins to the AtDPBF3-AtDPBF4-like sub-cluster, whereas eight HvbZIPs were close to Arabidopsis bZIP15 (Figure S1). The genes used for functional validation in the current study, HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 , comprise four exons each. The N-terminal region consists of tw o adjacent intrinsically disordered regions, including phosphorylation sites and binding site s for co-activators and repressors. The C- terminal region contains the conserved bZIP domain that is responsible for dimerization and DNA binding (Figure 1). After analyzing the regenerated plants, we obtained seven transgene-positive plants carrying gRNAs targeting HvbZIP33 and one transgene-positive plant carrying a gRNA targeting HvbZIP76 (Table S2). Sequencing of target regions detected mutation events in six T 0 progenies for HvbZIP33 and one for HvbZIP76 (Table S2). No off-target mutations were detected at predicted off-target sites for both gR NAs. We detected three allelic mutants for HvbZIP33 with one bp insertion, one bp deletion and four bp deletion, namely hvbzip33-1, hvbzip33-2 and hvbzip33-3 (Figure 1A). All three allelic mu tations introduced premature stop codons upstream of the bZIP domain in the HvbZIP33 protein, thereby completely disrupting the bZIP motif in all mutants (Figure S2). We identified a single allelic variant of HvbZIP76, characterized by a GTC deletion in the first ex on (Figure 1B). The three bp deletion resulted in an in-frame removal of a serine residue with in the intrinsically disordered region (Figure S3). This allelic mutant is referred to as hvbzip76 in the following text. 3.2. Physiological and biochemical response of hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 to drought stress To understand the functions of HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76, we compared wild-type Golden Promise (GP) and the mutants with respect to morphological, physiological and biochemical traits under control and drought conditions. Plant height and shoot fresh weight at the .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 11 seedling stage (21-day-old plants) were highest for GP and lowest for hvbzip33-3 under control conditions (Figure 2A-B). We observed a decrease in plant height and shoot weight in young seedlings in a treatment-dependent m anner (Figure 2). Upon exposure to drought stress, all allelic mutants of hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 showed wilting symptoms considerably earlier than GP. Initial wilting symptoms appeared at 6 DAS, with pronounced differences between GP and mutants occurring at 7 DAS (Figure 3a). Measurements of RWC and EL revealed significant effects of genotype, treatment and the interaction between genotype and treatment (Table 1). A significant reduction in RWC was observed at 9 DAS, which was more pronounced in hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 mutants compared to GP under drought stress (Figure 3b). EL, as an indicator of membrane damage, also increased under drought stress, with EL values significantly greater in hvbzip33-3 than wild-type GP at 9 DAS (Figure S4a). Although MDA concentration rose under drought stress relati ve to control conditions at 9 DAS, no significant differences were detected between wild-type GP and any of the hvbzip76 and hvbzip33 mutants (Figure S4b). We did not observe differences in plant morphology between adult wild-type GP plants and mutants under control conditions (Figure S5). 3.3. Photosynthetic response of hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 to drought stress Next, we conducted a gas-exchange experiment to quantify differences in photosynthetic parameters among wild-type GP, hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76. In general, under control conditions, gs, E and Ci were slightly lower in wild-type GP than in both mutant lines (Figure 4A-B, Figure S6). E and gs decreased under drought stress, with the reduction being more pronounced in wild-type GP than in hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76 at 3 and 6 DAS. However, the pattern was reversed at 9 DAS under drought (Figure 4A-B). Without drought stress, A was only slightly higher (statistical ly non-significant) in mutants hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76 than in wild-type GP. At 3 DAS, hvbzip76 had shown the highest A value under drought stress. Although statistically non-significant, A was lower in both mutants than in wild-type GP at 9 DAS under drought stress (Figure 4C). We also estimated iWUE as the ratio of A to gs. Because GP transpired less than both mutants, iWUE in wild-type GP was significantly higher under control conditions compared to the mutants (Figure 4D). Likewise, iWUE increased significantly under drought stress compared to control conditions, in a genotype- dependent manner. For example, we observed a clear trend of lower iWUE at all three measurement time points in hvbzip33-3 than in wild-type GP. In contrast, iWUE was lower in hvbzip76 than in wild-type GP under control conditions, whereas it was on a par in wild-type GP and hvbzip76 under drought stress (Figure 4D). 3.4. Transcriptome analysis of hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 mutants in barley Next, we performed a genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of wild-type GP, hvbzip76 and hvbzip33-3 to identify differentially regulated genetic components under control and drought .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 12 conditions. In accordance with our previous study (Shrestha et al. , 2022), we observed that HvbZIP76 expression was upregulated in barley in response to drought stress. We did not detect HvbZIP33 expression in leaf tissue at the seedling stage under either control or stress conditions (Figure S7). A total of 19004 genes were co-expressed acro ss all examined inbreds under both control and drought conditions (Figure S8). Principal component (PC) analysis of these global expression patterns revealed that PC1 (46. 13% variance) and PC2 (37.18% variance) together accounted for 83.31% of the total tr anscriptomic variation (Figure 5A). The two mutants clustered together along PC2 and were prim arily differentiated from wild-type GP by PC1. While PC1 and PC2 were strongly associated with genotype differences in expression, PC3 and PC4 showed stronger correlations with treatment conditions (Figure 5B), indicating that higher-order principal components captur e condition-specific transcriptomic responses (Figure 5D). Among the expressed genes, a total of 3368, 3081 and 2448 DEGs were identified between control and drought conditions in hvbzip76, hvbzip33-3 and wild-type GP, respectively, suggesting a higher number of DEGs in mutants than wild-type GP (Figure 6A, Table S3- S10). We detected a substantial central ov erlap of 1809 genes affected by drought stress, indicating the existence of fundamental drought -stress-responsive pathways. The number of unique DEGs was highest in hvbzip76 (1230) compared to hvbzip33-3 (409), indicating (i) broader regulatory influence due to mutation in HvbZIP76 and (ii) existence of non-redundant regulatory functions. The 777 DEGs between hvbzip76 and hvbzip33-3 may represent core genes under the control of HvbZIP76 and HvbZIP33 (Figure 6A). GOEA identified 19 biological processes and 38 molecular functions across six differential gene-expression contexts (Figure 6B and Figure S9). The context represents upregulated and downregulated genes in wild-type GP and mutants. The canonical drought-stress response GO terms, such as response to water (GO:0009415), proline biosynthetic processes (GO:0006561), and protein phosphor ylation (GO:0006468), were the most enriched among DEGs across all three genotypes. While two of the GO terms mentioned above were associated with genes upregulated under drought stress (GO:0009415 and GO:0006561), we observed coordinated suppression of genes encoding broad protein kinase activity. Interestingly, a specific group of protein kinases (GO:0004672) was linked among the upregulated genes under drought stress. Protein dephosphorylation (GO:0006470) and embryo development (GO:0009790) processes were also associated with up-regulated genes across all the genotypes. One of the most striking differences was the response to desiccation (GO:0009269), which was enriched among upregulated genes only in the wild-type GP (Figures 6B and S9). .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 13 Around 30 genes with sequence-specific DNA-binding (GO:0043565) properties were present in both up- and downregulated contexts in wild-type GP. In contrast, they were present only in the upregulated contexts in both mutants. Metal ion binding and transport functions were also enriched among the DEGs. While calcium ion binding (GO:0005509) was universally enriched in downregulated contex ts, iron ion binding (GO:0005506) was enriched among upregulated genes. It was noteworthy that heme binding (GO:0020037) GO terms were enriched in the downregulated context in both mutants, while metal ion transmembrane transporter activity (GO:0046873, GO:0005385) was particularly enriched in the downregulated context in hvbzip33-3. Peroxidase activity (GO:0004601) was enriched among downregulated genes in hvbzip76 (Figures 6B and S9). Because we observed higher g s and E values in mutants than in wild-type GP, we examined in detail the expression of genes known to regulate stomatal opening and closing under drought stress. We found that the fold change (control vs. drought) for the gene annotated as INDETERMINATE DOMAIN PROTEIN 14 (IDD14) was lowest in hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76 compared to wild-type GP. Similarly, the fold change relative to the control for the OPEN STOMATA 1 (OST1) gene was also lower in hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76 than in wild-type GP (Figure 6C). The fold change of another gene associated with stomatal movement, ACTIN- DEPOLYMERIZING FACTOR 5 (ADF5), was lowest in bzip33-3, followed by hvbzip76 and highest in wild-type GP (Figure 6C). These genes are known to regulate stomata pore size and higher expression facilitates stomata closure, reducing water loss during drought stress (Mustilli et al., 2002; Qian et al. , 2019; Liu et al., 2022). Therefore, the higher fold change in the expression of the above-discussed genes in wild-type GP might explain the earlier reduction in foliar transpiration in GP than in both mutants. 4. Discussion Our study aimed to characterize barley HvbZIP genes that are closely related to the Arabidopsis group A bZIP TF family. Phylogenetic analyses showed that 18 HvbZIP genes branched within the Arabidopsis group A bZIP TF, which comprises four ABF1-ABF4-like, DPBF3-DPBF4-like, DPBF1-DPBF2-like and bZIP15-like sub-clusters (Figure S1). HvbZIP33 (referred to as ABF1 in earlier studies but closely related to DPBF2) cotransfected with ABRC:GUS transactivated GUS in a transient expression assay (Schoonheim et al. , 2007; Schoonheim et al., 2009), indicating a possible role in ABA-mediated transcription activation. HvbZIP33 is the closest Arabidopsis ortholog of DPBF2 and may play a role in silique development. Similarly, HvbZIP76 (highly similar to ABF1-ABF4) was activated in four different barley accessions in an ABA-dependent manner, indicating a possible role in ABA- signaling (Shrestha et al. , 2022). Therefore, we selected HvbZIP33 (DPBF-like clade) and HvbZIP76 (ABF-like clade) for functional validation in the current study. For both genes, we .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 14 generated potential loss-of-function mutations using the RNA-guided Cas9 system (Figures 1, S2 and S3). 4.1. Function of HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 genes in plant development Previous studies have shown that bZIP transcription factors are involved in multiple critical physiological functions, including stress responses, development and metabolism (Jakoby et al., 2002). In addition, the DPBF-like clade in Arabidopsis is known to be involved in reproductive development (Lopez-Molina et al., 2003; Mendes et al., 2013). Since HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 are also expressed in the inflorescence (Mascher et al., 2017), we initially examined whether the spikes of the corr esponding mutants displayed any developmental defects. We observed that the number of grai ns per ear and thousand-grain weight were not significantly reduced in hvbzip76 and hvbzip33 compared to wild-type GP (Figure S5). While DPBF2 influences silique development in Arabidopsis, functional studies of the HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 orthologs in rice have primarily focused on stress response rather than reproductive traits, leaving the effects on gr ain size and number in monocots largely unexplored (Xiang et al. , 2008; Tang et al. , 2012; Chuxin et al. , 2021). Plant height and ear numbers in adult plants of hvbzip76, hvbzip33 and wild-type GP were not significantly different from each other (Figure S5). In cont rast, plant height and shoot fresh weight were markedly lower in hvbzip33-3 during the seedling stage. This implies that hvbzip33-3 plants employ compensatory growth mechanisms that allow them to catch up to wild-type by maturity. 4.2. HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 influence foliar transpiration in barley Drought experiments at the seedling stage revealed a striking physiological difference among the two mutants and the wild-type GP, where the mutants consistently showed higher gs and E at 3 DAS and 6 DAS under drought stress, resulting in lower iWUE. This might have contributed to the more rapid wilting and lower RWC in hvbzip76 and hvbzip33 than in wild- type GP (Figure 2A). Our observation was consistent with findings in other species. In rice, lines overexpressing OsbZIP23, a group A bZIP TF, exhibited a reduced transpiration rate compared with the wild-type (Xiang et al. , 2008). Similarly, transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing CaADBZ1 (a pepper bZIP TF from the same group A clade) showed enhanced ABA sensitivity and stomatal closure (Choi et al., 2025). Furthermore, Arabidopsis ABF knockout mutants showed higher water loss rates than wild-type in detached leaf assays (Yoshida et al., 2010; Seller and Schroeder, 2023) providing cross-species evidence that group A bZIP TFs might function as positive regulators of stomatal closure under drought stress. Our transcriptome experiment partially explained these aforementioned phenotypic differences. Under drought stress, mutants showed consistently reduced drought stress- .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 15 induced expression of key regulatory genes compared to wild-type GP. Specifically, HvADF5 expression showed the lowest fold-change in hvbzip33-3, intermediate in hvbzip76, and highest in wild-type GP (Figure 6C). The above observation is consistent with ADF5's role in Arabidopsis as a positive regulator of drought -induced stomatal closure, acting downstream of DPBF transcription factors (Qian et al. , 2019). Similarly, HvIDD14 and HvOST1 , both known to enhance ABA sensitivity and mediate stomatal responses in Arabidopsis (Mustilli et al., 2002; Liu et al. , 2022) showed reduced drought induction in both barley mutants (Fig. 6C). The phylogenetic clustering of HvbZIP33 with the DPBF clade supports its role in this regulatory module. Collectively, these findings indicate that HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 might increase drought tolerance by promoting stomatal closure and water conservation through transcriptional regulation of ABA signaling components. The difference in gs and E was less pronounced under control conditions than drought stress, s uggesting that the mutations primarily impair stomatal responsiveness rather than baseline development. However, whether the observed phenotypes result from altered stomatal movement, changes in stomatal size and density, or both remains to be determined. Further anatomical and physiological investigation is needed to distinguish these mechanisms, particularly given that stomata account for over 95% of plant water loss (Hedrich and Shabala, 2018). 4.3. Transcriptomic redundancy and divergence among wild-type GP, hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 mutants On a genome-wide scale, the number of DEGs comparing wild-type GP versus hvbzip76 and hvbzip33-3 was 24-40 times lower than the number of DEGs between control and drought stress conditions (Figure 6A). The quantitative disparity reveals a crucial mechanistic insight that DEGs in wild-type GP versus mutants primarily reflect the contribution of a single bZIP gene. In contrast, the stress versus control co mparison captures parallel pathways regulated by stress-responsive multi-gene families that extend beyond the genes studied. GOEA of DEGs between control and drought-s tress conditions revealed that canonical drought-stress-responsive biological proc esses were commonly enriched across three genotypes, indicating that fundamental stress -responsive mechanisms are conserved even in the mutants. Response to water (GO:0009415) was prominently enriched among the upregulated DEGs (Figure 6B, Figure S9). Protein phosphorylation (GO:0006468), particularly SnRKs, was similarly enriched among drought-stress-responsive genes, consistent with the ABA-SnRK2 signaling pathway, wherein ABA-activated SnRK2 kinases (including SnRK2.6/OST1) phosphorylate multiple downstream targets (Geiger et al. , 2009; Yoshida et al. , 2010; Yoshida et al. , 2015). The proline biosynthetic process (GO:0006561) was also enriched among upregulated genes across all three inbreds, confirming that the .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 16 fundamental metabolic capacity for osmotic adjustment through proline accumulation (Handa et al. , 1986; Szabados and Savouré, 2010; Du et al. , 2023) was also preserved in the mutants. However, striking genotype-specific differenc es emerged in other GO term enrichments, revealing divergent regulatory capacities. For instance, heme-binding (GO:0020037) and peroxidase activity-related (GO:0004601) were notably enriched among the downregulated genes in both mutants but not in wild-type GP (Figure 6B, Figure S9). These differences are functionally relevant because heme-binding proteins, including peroxidases and catalase, are the critical components of cellular redox homeostasis and antioxidant defense (Foyer and Noctor, 2005; Eid et al. , 2024). Their downregulation may explain the marginally higher electrolyte leakage (EL) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content (markers of oxidative stress) observed in the mutants under drought stress. Most strikingly, the desiccation response GO term (GO:0009269) was enriched exclusively among the upregulated genes in wild-type GP (Figure 6B, Figure S9). Such transcriptomic diffe rence suggests a direct or indirect role for HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76 in activating genes that protect cellular structures and macromolecules during severe water deficit (Yoshida et al. , 2015). The absence of this enrichment in the mutants represents a critical functional gap in drought tolerance. Additional genotype-specific patterns included metal ion-related molecular functions: Ca2+ ion binding (GO:0005509) was universally enriched in the downregulated context, while iron ion binding (GO:0005506) showed differential enrichm ent patterns across genotypes (Figure 6B, Figure S9). The downregulation of Ca 2+ binding proteins might indicate a mechanism to reduce intracellular Ca 2+ buffering capacity, facilitating stomatal closure (You et al. , 2023). Conversely, metal ion transmembrane trans porter activity (GO:0046873) was enriched exclusively among downregulated genes in hvbzip33-3 mutant under drought stress. Finally, the sequence-specific DNA binding process (GO:0043565) showed bidirectional regulation (both up- and downregulated genes) in wild-type GP, whereas this process was observed only in the upregulated context in both mutants. Therefore, the transcriptional landscape in wild-type GP is more balanced, with represent ation of transcription factors that are both repressed and activated by drought stress. (Figure 6B, Figure S9). 5. Conclusion The fact that knocking out just two bZIP genes of class A family resulted in significant physiological changes suggests limited f unctional redundancy among these transcription factors in barley. Further research to characteri ze the complete family of class A bZIP TFs in barley and their individual contributions to stomatal regulation will provide a more comprehensive understanding of this regulator y network. The observation of increased .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 17 stomatal conductance and transpiration rate in barley knockout mutants, particularly under drought conditions, underscores the critical role of these transcription factors in regulating plant water relations. By functioning as positiv e regulators of genes involved in stomatal closure, bZIP transcription factors helped wild-type GP to conserve water during drought. The delicate balance between carbon assimilation and water conservation, regulated by bZIP transcription factors, might represent a key aspect of plant adaptation to water-limited environments, with significant implications for agricultural productivity. Authors Contribution AN, JL and AS conceptualized the study. JK, GH and AS created transgenic lines. JB, CS, THN and AS conducted the experiments. MS, VSB, BS and AS analyzed the data. AS wrote the manuscript with the input from BS, JK , MS, VSB and AN. AN and JL supervised the experiment and acquired the funding for the research.

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to Josef Bauer, Jö rg Nettekoven and Thomas Gerhardt from the University of Bonn, who organized logistics for greenhouse experiments. We would also like to thank Sabine Sommerfeld (Plant Reproductive Biology, IPK) for excellent technical support. We also appreciate de.NBI for providing the cloud computing platform. The Graduate School GRK2064 was supported by funding from the German Research Foundation and core funding from the Julius Kühn Institute provided the necessary financial support for the research. Authors acknowledge the use of the Grammarly plug-in to prevent grammatical mistakes. Data Availability The raw sequencing reads from the RNA-seq experiment are available under project PRJEB105244 (accession ID: ERA35397371) in the European Nucleotide Archive. The processed, normalized read-count data are pr ovided as supplementary data. All phenotype data are presented in graphs and tables, and the raw data will also be made available upon request to the corresponding authors. Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 18

References

Agarwal P, Baranwal VK, Khurana P. 2019. Genome-wide Analysis of bZIP Transcription Factors in wheat and Functional Characterization of a TabZIP under Abiotic Stress. Scientific reports 9, 4608. Alonso R, Oñate-Sánchez L, Weltmeier F et al. 2009. A pivotal role of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor bZIP53 in the regulation of Arabidopsis seed maturation gene expression based on heterodimerization and protein complex formation. The Plant cell 21, 1747–1761. Al-Sayaydeh R, Ayad J, Harwood W, Al-Abdallat AM. 2024. Stress-Inducible Expression of HvABF2 Transcription Factor Improves Water Deficit Tolerance in Transgenic Barley Plants. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) 13. Amir Hossain M, Lee Y, Cho J-I et al. 2010. The bZIP transcription factor OsABF1 is an ABA responsive element binding factor that enhances abiotic stress signaling in rice. Plant molecular biology 72, 557–566. Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 57, 289–300. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 30, 2114–2120. Cao X, Costa LM, Biderre-Petit C et al. 2007. Abscisic acid and stress signals induce Viviparous1 expression in seed and vegetative tissues of maize. Plant physiology 143, 720–731 . Casaretto J, Ho T-HD. 2003. The transcription factors HvABI5 and HvVP1 are required for the abscisic acid induction of gene expression in barley aleurone cells. The Plant cell 15, 271–284. Chang H-C, Tsai M-C, Wu S-S, Chang I-F. 2019. Regulation of ABI5 expression by ABF3 during salt stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Botanical studies 60, 16. Chen Y, Lun ATL, Smyth GK. 2016. From reads to genes to pathways: differential expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments using Rsubread and the edgeR quasi- likelihood pipeline. F1000Research 5, 1438. Choi H, Hong J, Ha J, Kang J, Kim SY. 2000. ABFs, a family of ABA-responsive element binding factors. The Journal of biological chemistry 275, 1723–1730. Choi J, Lim CW, Lee SC. 2025. Role of pepper bZIP transcription factor CaADBZ1 in abscisic acid signalling and drought stress response. Physiologia plantarum 177, e70159. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 19 Chuxin W, Chengchao Z, Yu Z et al. 2021. OsbZIP09, a Unique OsbZIP Transcription Factor of Rice, Promotes Rather Than Suppresses Seed Germination by Attenuating Abscisic Acid Pathway. Rice Science 28, 358–367. Dhatterwal P, Sharma N, Prasad M. 2024. Decoding the functionality of plant transcription factors. Journal of experimental botany 75, 4745–4759. Du L, Huang X, Ding L et al. 2023. TaERF87 and TaAKS1 synergistically regulate TaP5CS1/TaP5CR1-mediated proline biosynthesis to enhance drought tolerance in wheat. The New phytologist 237, 232–250. Dziwornu AK, Shrestha A, Matthus E, Ali B, Wu L-B, Frei M. 2018. Responses of contrasting rice genotypes to excess manganese and their implications for lignin synthesis. Plant physiology and biochemistry PPB 123, 252–259. Eid M, Barayeu U, Sulková K, Aranda-Vallejo C, Dick TP. 2024. Using the heme peroxidase APEX2 to probe intracellular H2O2 flux and diffusion. Nature communications 15, 1239. Foyer CH, Noctor G. 2005. Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: a metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. The Plant cell 17, 1866–1875. Fujita Y, Fujita M, Satoh R et al. 2005. AREB1 is a transcription activator of novel ABRE- dependen t ABA signaling that enhances drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. The Plant cell 17, 3470–3488. Geiger D, Scherzer S, Mumm P et al. 2009. Activity of guard cell anion channel SLAC1 is controlled by drought-stress signaling kinase-phosphatase pair. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 21425–21430. Gómez-Cadenas A, Verhey SD, Holappa LD, Shen Q, Ho TH, Walker-Simmons MK. 1999. An abscisic acid-induced protein kinase, PKABA1, mediates abscisic acid- suppressed gene expression in barley aleurone layers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96, 1767–1772. Handa S, Handa AK, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA. 1986. Proline accumulation and the adaptation of cultured plant cells to water stress. Plant physiology 80, 938–945. He L, Wu Z, Wang X et al. 2024. A novel maize F-bZIP member, ZmbZIP76, functions as a positive regulator in ABA-mediated abiotic stress tolerance by binding to ACGT- containing elements. Plant science an international journal of experimental plant biology 341, 111952. Hedrich R, Shabala S. 2018. Stomata in a saline world. Current opinion in plant biology 46, 87–95. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 20 Hobo T, Asada M, Kowyama Y, Hattori T. 1999. ACGT-containing abscisic acid response element (ABRE) and coupling element 3 (CE3) are functionally equivalent. The Plant journal for cell and molecular biology 19, 679–689. Hodges DM, DeLong JM, Forney CF, Prange RK. 1999. Improving the thiobarbituric acid- reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta 207, 604–611. Hossain MA, Cho J-I, Han M et al. 2010. The ABRE-binding bZIP transcription factor OsABF2 is a positive regulator of abiotic stress and ABA signaling in rice. Journal of plant physiology 167, 1512–1520. Huang X-S, Liu J-H, Chen X-J. 2010. Overexpression of PtrABF gene, a bZIP transcription factor isolated from Poncirus trifoliata, enhances dehydration and drought tolerance in tobacco via scavenging ROS and modulating expression of stress-responsive genes. BMC plant biology 10, 230. Jakoby M, Weisshaar B, Dröge-Laser W et al. 2002. bZIP transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends in plant science 7, 106–111. Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y et al. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 30, 1236–1240. Kaur R, Sharma N, Jain P, Verma M, Apkari A, Rishi V. 2025. Mapping the dimerization specificity of bZIP transcription factors in bread wheat. Klopfenstein DV, Zhang L, Pedersen BS et al. 2018. GOATOOLS: A Python library for Gene Ontology analyses. Scientific reports 8, 10872. Leng G, Hall J. 2019. Crop yield sensitivity of global major agricultural countries to droughts and the projected changes in the future. The Science of the total environment 654, 811– 821. Li M, Yao T, Lin W et al. 2023. Double DAP-seq uncovered synergistic DNA binding of interacting bZIP transcription factors. Nature communications 14, 2600. Li X, Feng B, Zhang F et al. 2016. Bioinformatic Analyses of Subgroup-A Members of the Wheat bZIP Transcription Factor Family and Functional Identification of TabZIP174 Involved in Drought Stress Response. Frontiers in plant science 7, 1643. Liu C, Mao B, Ou S et al. 2014. OsbZIP71, a bZIP transcription factor, confers salinity and drought tolerance in rice. Plant molecular biology 84, 19–36. Liu J, Shu D, Tan Z et al. 2022. The Arabidopsis IDD14 transcription factor interacts with bZIP-type ABFs/AREBs and cooperatively regulates ABA-mediated drought tolerance. The New phytologist 236, 929–942. Lopez-Molina L, Mongrand S, Kinoshita N, Chua N-H. 2003. AFP is a novel negative regulator of ABA signaling that promotes ABI5 protein degradation. Genes & development 17, 410–418. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 21 Marthe C, Kumlehn J, Hensel G. 2015. Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) transformation using immature embryos, Third edition. New York: Humana Press. Mendes A, Kelly AA, van Erp H et al. 2013. bZIP67 regulates the omega-3 fatty acid content of Arabidopsis seed oil by activating fatty acid desaturase3. The Plant cell 25, 3104–3116. Mustilli A-C, Merlot S, Vavasseur A, Fenzi F, Giraudat J. 2002. Arabidopsis OST1 protein kinase mediates the regulation of stomatal aperture by abscisic acid and acts upstream of reactive oxygen species production. The Plant cell 14, 3089–3099. Nakashima K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. 2025. Transcriptional gene network involved in drought stress response: application for crop breeding in the context of climate change. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 380, 20240236. Nijhawan A, Jain M, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP. 2008. Genomic survey and gene expression analysis of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family in rice. Plant physiology 146, 333–350. Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea GM, Leek JT, Salzberg SL. 2016. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nature protocols 11, 1650–1667. Pourabed E, Ghane Golmohamadi F, Soleymani Monfared P, Razavi SM, Shobbar Z-S. 2015. Basic leucine zipper family in barley: genome-wide characterization of members and expression analysis. Molecular biotechnology 57, 12–26. Qian D, Zhang Z, He J et al. 2019. Arabidopsis ADF5 promotes stomatal closure by regulating actin cytoskeleton remodeling in response to ABA and drought stress. Journal of experimental botany 70, 435–446. Roychoudhury A, Sengupta DN. 2009. The promoter-elements of some abiotic stress- inducible genes from cereals interact with a nuclear protein from tobacco. Biologia plantarum 53, 583–587. Schoonheim PJ, Costa Pereira DDA, Boer AH de. 2009. Dual role for 14-3-3 proteins and ABF transcription factors in gibberellic acid and abscisic acid signalling in barley (Hordeum vulgare) aleurone cells. Plant, cell & environment 32, 439–447. Schoonheim PJ, Sinnige MP, Casaretto JA et al. 2007. 14-3-3 adaptor proteins are intermediates in ABA signal transduction during barley seed germination. The Plant journal for cell and molecular biology 49, 289–301. Seller CA, Schroeder JI. 2023. Distinct guard cell-specific remodeling of chromatin accessibility during abscisic acid- and CO2-dependent stomatal regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 120, e2310670120. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 22 Shen Q, Ho TH. 1995. Functional dissection of an abscisic acid (ABA)-inducible gene reveals two independent ABA-responsive complexes each containing a G-box and a novel cis-acting element. The Plant cell 7, 295–307. Shen Q, Uknes SJ, Ho TH. 1993. Hormone response complex in a novel abscisic acid and cycloheximide-inducible barley gene. Journal of Biological Chemistry 268, 23652–23660. Shen Q, Zhang P, Ho TH. 1996. Modular nature of abscisic acid (ABA) response complexes: composite promoter units that are necessary and sufficient for ABA induction of gene expression in barley. The Plant cell 8, 1107–1119. Shen QJ, Casaretto JA, Zhang P, Ho T-HD. 2004. Functional definition of ABA-response complexes: the promoter units necessary and sufficient for ABA induction of gene expression in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant molecular biology 54, 111–124. Shrestha A, Fendel A, Nguyen TH et al. 2022. Natural diversity uncovers P5CS1 regulation and its role in drought stress tolerance and yield sustainability in barley. Plant, cell & environment 45, 3523–3536. Szabados L, Savouré A. 2010. Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends in plant science 15, 89–97. Tang N, Zhang H, Li X, Xiao J, Xiong L. 2012. Constitutive activation of transcription factor OsbZIP46 improves drought tolerance in rice. P lant physiology 158, 1755–1768. Uno Y, Furihata T, Abe H, Yoshida R, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. 2000. Arabidopsis basic leucine zipper transcription factors involved in an abscisic acid- dependent signal transduction pathway under drought and high-salinity conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 11632–11637. van Leene J, Blomme J, Kulkarni SR et al. 2016. Functional characterization of the Arabidopsis transcription factor bZIP29 reveals its role in leaf and root development. Journal of experimental botany 67, 5825–5840. Wang Z, Su G, Li M et al. 2016. Overexpressing Arabidopsis ABF3 increases tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses and reduces leaf size in alfalfa. Plant physiology and biochemistry PPB 109, 199–208. Wei K, Chen J, Wang Y et al. 2012. Genome-wide analysis of bZIP-encoding genes in maize. DNA research an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes 19, 463–476. Xiang Y, Tang N, Du H, Ye H, Xiong L. 2008. Characterization of OsbZIP23 as a key player of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family for conferring abscisic acid sensitivity and salinity and drought tolerance in rice. Plant physiology 148, 1938–1952. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint 23 Yang J, Wang M, Li W et al. 2019. Reducing expression of a nitrate-responsive bZIP transcription factor increases grain yield and N use in wheat. Plant biotechnology journal 17, 1823–1833. Yoshida T, Fujita Y, Maruyama K et al. 2015. Four Arabidopsis AREB/ABF transcription factors function predominantly in gene expression downstream of SnRK2 kinases in abscisic acid signalling in response to osmotic stress. Plant, cell & environment 38, 35– 49. Yoshida T, Fujita Y, Sayama H et al. 2010. AREB1, AREB2, and ABF3 are master transcription factors that cooperatively regulate ABRE-dependent ABA signaling involved in drought stress tolerance and require ABA for full activation. The Plant journal for cell and molecular biology 61, 672–685. You Z, Guo S, Li Q et al. 2023. The CBL1/9-CIPK1 calcium sensor negatively regulates drought stress by phosphorylating the PYLs ABA receptor. Nature communications 14, 5886. Zhang C, Li C, Liu J et al. 2017. The OsABF1 transcription factor improves drought tolerance by activating the transcription of COR413-TM1 in rice. Journal of experimental botany 68, 4695–4707. Zhong X, Feng X, Li Y et al. 2021. Genome-wide identification of bZIP transcription factor genes related to starch synthesis in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Genome 64, 1067– 1080. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint Traits Genotype Treatment Genotype:Treatment Treatment:Repitition Treatment:DAS Ci *** *** ns *** *** A ns *** ns *** *** gs *** *** ns *** *** E *** *** ns ** *** iWUE *** *** * ns ns RWC (%) ** *** * *** *** MDA (mg g-1) ns *** ns NA *** EL (%) ** *** * *** *** Plant height (cm) *** *** ns ns NA Shoot fresh weight (g) *** *** ns *** NA Shoot dry weight (g) ns * ns ns NA Table 1: Analysis of variance in physiological and morphological traits evaluated under control and drought conditions. Drought stress was imposed on 14-day-old seedlings via controlled dehydration, resulting in a uniform water loss across all experimental units. Photosynthetic and physiological traits were evaluated 3, 6, and 9 days after the start of the stress treatment (DAS). Morphological data were collected at the end of the experiment, 9 days after stress. Asterisks indicate level of significance (***, p ≤ 0.001; **, p ≤ 0.01 *, p ≤ 0.05, not significant (ns), p > 0.05). The experiment was repeated twice (Repetition), with four to six biological replicates per repetition. Abbreviation: not applicable (NA). .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint Figure 1: Mutation even in the coding sequence of HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76. Insertion and deletion mutations were detected in (A) HvbZIP33 and (B) HvbZIP76 in genome editing pipelines using the RNA-guided Cas9 endonuclease. The rectangular boxes are the exons; the green and blue regions represent conserved domains. The black triangle indicates the site of mutation. A B .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint Figure 2: Morphological parameters evaluated under control and drought conditions in Golden Promise (GP) and mutants. The effect of drought stress on (A) plant height, (B) shoot fresh weight, and (C) shoot dry weight. Drought stress was imposed on 14-day-old seedlings via controlled dehydration, ensuring uniform water loss across all experimental units. The morphological evaluation was performed 9 days after the start of stress treatment. Two independent experiments were performed. Each experiment comprised four biological replications per genotype per treatment. The bar represents mean ± standard error (n = 8 to 12). Indexed letter represents significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between the genotypes using the LSD multiple mean comparison test. A B C .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint A B Figure 3: Foliar relative water content evaluated under control and drought conditions in Golden Promise (GP) and mutants. (A) The effect of drought stress on Golden promise (GP) and hvbzip33 and hvbzip76 mutants 7 days after stress (DAS). White scale bar corresponds to a length of 8 cm. (B) Relative water content in the first fully expanded leaf from the top at 3, 6 and 9 days after the start of stress treatment (DAS). Drought stress was imposed on 14-day-old seedlings via controlled dehydration, resulting in a uniform water loss across all experimental units. The bar represents mean ± standard error (n = 8 to 12). Indexed letter represents significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between the genotypes using the LSD multiple mean comparison test. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint Figure 4: Gas exchange parameters evaluated under control and drought conditions in wild-type Golden Promise (GP) and mutants. The effect of drought stress on (A) stomatal conductance (gs), (B) transpiration rate (E), (C) CO2 assimilation (A) and (D) intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE). Drought stress was imposed on 14- day-old seedlings via controlled dehydration, ensuring uniform water loss across all experimental units. First gas exchange parameters were evaluated at 3 days after the start of stress treatment (DAS) on the first fully expanded leaf from the top. It was then measured again on 6 and 9 DAS on the same leaf. Two independent experiments were performed. Each experiment comprised four to five biological replications per genotype per treatment. The bar represents mean ± standard error (n = 8-12). Indexed letter represents significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between the genotypes using the LSD multiple mean comparison test. A B DC .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint Figure 5: Principal component (PC) analysis of transcriptome profile of GP, hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76. (A-C) The variance explained by PC1, PC2, PC3, and PC4 on the global gene expression profile of GP, hvbzip33-3 and hvbzip76 under control and drought stress. (D) The correlation between PCs and the experimental factors (genotype and growth condition). Asterisks indicate a statistically significant correlation coefficient. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint A B C .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint Figure 6: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for control versus drought comparison among GP and mutants. (A) Venn diagram illustrating the number of DEGs representing core drought-induced response genes, possible overlapping targets and unique to HvbZIP33 and HvbZIP76. (B) Gene ontology classification and enrichment analysis. The circle’s size indicates the number of genes. The color indicates the -log10 transformation of the false-discovery-rate p-value. (C) Heat map of fold change (control vs drought) of barley orthologs of genes known to be associated with stomata movement in Arabidopsis and rice. Red and blue color indicate the high and low fold change, respectively under drought compared to control conditions. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 2, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697348doi: bioRxiv preprint

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0