Full text
94,040 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Genome-wide pleiotropy analysis of longitudinal blood pressure and harmonized cognitive performance measures | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Genome-wide pleiotropy analysis of longitudinal blood pressure and harmonized cognitive performance measures View ORCID Profile Moonil Kang , Ting Fang Alvin Ang , Sherral A. Devine , Richard Sherva , Shubhabrata Mukherjee , Emily H. Trittschuh , Laura E. Gibbons , Phoebe Scollard , Michael Lee , Seo-Eun Choi , Brandon Klinedinst , Connie Nakano , Logan C. Dumitrescu , Timothy J. Hohman , Michael L. Cuccaro , Andrew J. Saykin , Walter A. Kukull , David A. Bennett , Li-San Wang , Richard P. Mayeux , Jonathan L. Haines , Margaret A. Pericak-Vance , Gerard D. Schellenberg , Paul K. Crane , Rhoda Au , Kathryn L. Lunetta , Jesse Mez , Lindsay A. Farrer doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.11.25322014 Moonil Kang 1 Department of Medicine (Biomedical Genetics), Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Moonil Kang Ting Fang Alvin Ang 2 Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA 3 Framingham Heart Study, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA 4 Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Sherral A. Devine 2 Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA 3 Framingham Heart Study, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Richard Sherva 1 Department of Medicine (Biomedical Genetics), Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Shubhabrata Mukherjee 5 Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle, WA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Emily H. Trittschuh 6 Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center , Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 7 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle, WA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Laura E. Gibbons 5 Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle, WA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Phoebe Scollard 5 Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle, WA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Michael Lee 5 Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle, WA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Seo-Eun Choi 5 Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle, WA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Brandon Klinedinst 5 Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle, WA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Connie Nakano 5 Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle, WA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Logan C. Dumitrescu 8 Vanderbilt Memory & Alzheimer’s Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center , Nashville, TN 9 Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center , Nashville, TN Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Timothy J. Hohman 8 Vanderbilt Memory & Alzheimer’s Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center , Nashville, TN 9 Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center , Nashville, TN Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Michael L. Cuccaro 10 John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, Miller School of Medicine , Miami, FL Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Andrew J. Saykin 11 Indiana Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, IN 12 Department of Radiology and Imaging Services, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, IN 13 Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, IN Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Walter A. Kukull 14 Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington , Seattle, WA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site David A. Bennett 15 Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center , Chicago, IL Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Li-San Wang 16 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia, PA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Richard P. Mayeux 17 Department of Neurology, Columbia University School of Medicine , New York, NY Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jonathan L. Haines 18 Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, OH Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Margaret A. Pericak-Vance 10 John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, Miller School of Medicine , Miami, FL Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Gerard D. Schellenberg 16 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia, PA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Paul K. Crane 5 Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle, WA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Rhoda Au 2 Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA 3 Framingham Heart Study, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA 4 Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA 19 Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA 20 Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health , Boston, MA 21 Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Kathryn L. Lunetta 3 Framingham Heart Study, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA 22 Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jesse Mez 3 Framingham Heart Study, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA 19 Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA 21 Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Lindsay A. Farrer 1 Department of Medicine (Biomedical Genetics), Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA 3 Framingham Heart Study, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA 19 Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA 20 Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health , Boston, MA 21 Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA 22 Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health , Boston, MA 23 Department of Ophthalmology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: farrer{at}bu.edu Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Background Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified over 1,000 blood pressure (BP) loci and over 80 loci for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Considering BP is an AD risk factor, identifying pleiotropy in BP and cognitive performance measures may indicate mechanistic links between BP and AD. Methods Genome-wide scans for pleiotropy in BP variables—systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), mean arterial (MAP), and pulse pressure (PP)—and co-calibrated scores for cognitive domains (executive function, language, and memory) were performed using generalized linear mixed models and 116,075 longitudinal measures from 25,726 participants of clinic-based and prospective cohorts. GWAS was conducted using PLACO to estimate each SNP’s main effect and interaction with age, and their joint effect on pleiotropy. Effects of genome-wide significant (GWS) pleiotropic SNPs on cognition as direct or mediated through BP were evaluated using Mendelian randomization. Potential contribution of genes in top-ranked pleiotropic loci to cognitive resilience was assessed by comparing their expression in brain tissue from pathologically confirmed AD cases with and without clinical symptoms. Results Pleiotropy GWAS identified GWS associations with APOE and 11 novel loci. In the total sample, pleiotropy was identified for SBP and language with JPH2 ( P Joint =6.09×10 -9 ) and GATA3 ( P G×Age =1.42×10 -8 ), MAP and executive function with PAX2 ( P G×Age =4.22×10 -8 ), MAP and language with LOC105371656 ( P G×Age =1.75×10 -8 ), and DBP and language with SUFU ( P G =2.10×10 -8 ). In prospective cohorts, pleiotropy was found for SBP and language with RTN4 ( P G×Age =1.49×10 -8 ), DBP and executive function with ULK2 ( P Joint =2.85×10 -8 ), PP and memory with SORBS2 ( P G =2.33×10 -8 ), and DBP and memory with LOC100128993 ( P G×Age =2.81×10 -8 ). In clinic-based cohorts, pleiotropy was observed for PP and language with ADAMTS3 ( P G =2.37×10 -8 ) and SBP and memory with LINC02946 ( P G×Age =3.47×10 -8 ). Five GWS pleiotropic loci influence cognition directly, and genes at six pleiotropic loci were differentially expressed between pathologically confirmed AD cases with and without clinical symptoms. Conclusion Our results provide insight into the underlying mechanisms of high BP and AD. Ongoing efforts to harmonize BP and cognitive measures across several cohorts will improve the power of discovering, replicating, and generalizing novel associations with pleiotropic loci. Introduction Hypertension is a well-established risk factor for dementia [ 1 ], particularly Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and vascular dementia—the two most common types of dementia which usually co-exist and collectively account for 85% of dementia cases [ 2 ]. Accumulating evidence from large-scale longitudinal studies consistently suggests that elevated blood pressure (BP) in midlife (45−65 years) is associated with a higher risk of late-life dementia [ 3 , 4 ] and a steeper cognitive decline [ 5 ]. However, while the association of late-life high BP with incident AD and AD-related dementias (ADRD) and cognitive decline is controversial in older adults [ 6 ], multiple studies report the benefit of lowering BP in elderly hypertensive patients [ 7 , 8 ] and the association of abnormally lower diastolic BP (DBP) in late-life with a higher risk of cognitive impairment and AD/ADRD [ 9 , 10 ]. Data from the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) indicate that patterns of age-related systolic BP (SBP) and DBP changes differ in older adults. Compared to SBP which linearly rises across the life course, DBP increases continuously until 50−60 years but decreases after age 60, corresponding to a late-life increase in pulse pressure (PP) [ 11 ]. Although multiple genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 1,000 loci for various BP traits [ 12 - 14 ] and 80 loci associated with the risk of AD/ADRD [ 15 - 18 ], only a few studies have investigated their shared genetic architecture [ 19 , 20 ] that has been implied by neuropathological evidence showing a link between high BP and AD [ 21 - 23 ]. Here, we investigated pleiotropy, occurring when a single gene or variant affects two or more phenotypes [ 24 ], for BP traits and measures of cognitive performance on a genome-wide scale in several large clinic-based and prospective cohorts. Identifying pleiotropy for BP and cognitive performance measures may provide more insight into the genetic basis and mechanistic links between high BP and AD/ADRD. In addition, based on recent evidence suggesting that BP and biomarkers of vascular integrity may impact cognitive resilience through tau pathology [ 25 , 26 ], we compared expression of genes located within top-ranked loci from the GWAS in brain tissue obtained from individuals with pathologically confirmed AD who were cognitively impaired or normal ( i . e ., cognitively resilient) prior to death to test the hypothesis that some of these pleiotropic genes may influence propensity to cognitive resilience in addition to or independent of mechanisms leading to AD hallmark amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau pathologies. Methods Participant ascertainment and assessment This study included non-Hispanic white participants aged 60 or older from five longitudinal cohort studies. Three cohorts, including the FHS [ 27 - 29 ], the Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) Study [ 30 ], and the Religious Orders Study/Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP) [ 31 ], recruited cognitively normal participants and followed them over time. The National Institute on Aging (NIA)-sponsored Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers, which collect a uniform set of phenotypic data archived by the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) [ 32 , 33 ], and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) [ 34 , 35 ] are clinic-based cohorts. Individuals in these cohorts included in this study were cognitively normal or met the criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD at the most recent examination. All participants underwent an examination at enrollment and each follow-up visit, including basic anthropometry, BP measurements, medications, and medical history. For those taking antihypertensive medications at the time point when BP was measured, we added 10 and 5 mmHg to the measured SBP and DBP, respectively, as previously recommended [ 36 ]. These corrected SBP and DBP were used to calculate PP (SBP minus DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP; DBP plus one third of PP) [ 37 ]. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated in the unit of kg/m 2 as one’s weight divided by the square of height at each examination. Further information regarding the ascertainment, evaluation, and diagnostic procedures in each cohort was described elsewhere [ 30 - 32 , 35 , 38 , 39 ]. Cognitive domain scores As described previously [ 40 - 42 ], cognitive domain scores for executive function, language, and memory were calculated from tests from unique cognitive batteries administered across the five cohort studies and co-calibrated to be on the same scale across cohorts. Briefly, an expert panel of neuropsychologists and behavioral neurologists classified neuropsychological (NP) test items into one of the cognitive domains. Anchor items, identical NP test items found in multiple batteries, were used to put composite scores on the same scale across studies. Co-calibrated composite scores for each cognitive domain were generated using confirmatory factor analysis in Mplus [ 43 ] with loadings for anchor items forced to be equal across studies. Co-calibrated cognitive scores with a standard error (SE) > 0.6 and those obtained solely from the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), which shows a ceiling effect [ 42 ], were excluded. We also excluded data collected at ages < 60 that were available only for FHS participants to mitigate the concern that the genetic architecture of BP and/or cognitive performance may differ at younger ages. Genotype QC, generating PC, and GRM Genotype quality control (QC) procedures were applied to the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed)-imputed genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data [ 18 , 44 ], which were aligned to the Genome Research Consortium human build 38 (GRCh38). After excluding variants with poor imputation quality ( r 2 < 0.3) or minor allele frequency (MAF) 0.05 and call rate > 99%) with an LD threshold of 0.1, and principal components (PCs) of the population structure for each sample within each cohort study were derived from the LD-pruned variants using GENESIS [ 45 ]. A kinship matrix for family-based samples was estimated for FHS participants using self-reported pedigree information and the R package kinship2 [ 46 ]. An empirical genetic relationship matrix (GRM) was derived for other individuals using established procedures [ 47 - 49 ]. GWAS for BP and cognitive domain measures We performed GWAS for SBP, DBP, MAP, and PP in each dataset separately using the GMMAT [ 50 ] and MAGEE [ 51 ] software. The association of each SNP with BP traits over time was evaluated in the following generalized linear mixed model: In the model, α A , α B , and α C represent the effects of age, sex, and BMI, respectively, and α i denotes the effect of the first five PCs. β G and β G×Age indicate the SNP and SNP×age interaction effects, respectively. GRM was also included in the model as a random effect. We utilized the GWAS results for executive function, language, and memory that were generated previously in each dataset by applying similar models including the SNP and SNP×age interaction terms, and covariates for age, sex, educational level (less than high school, high school, some college, or college graduate), GRM, and the first five PCs [ 52 ]. The SNP×age interaction term accounts for the inclusion of data collected from individuals at multiple time points and allows for the possibility of associations that are age-dependent. In models for all traits, age was centered by subtracting the median age for all observations for all individuals in the dataset from the age at each exam to alleviate the multicollinearity and improve the interpretability of the SNP×age interaction model coefficients [ 53 ]. A random age slope and intercept were incorporated in the model to account for repeated measures. Results from each dataset were combined by meta-analysis using the inverse variance-weighted method in METAL [ 54 ]. We also calculated a P -value for the joint test of the null hypothesis that the SNP and SNP×age interaction effects are both zero by combining Z -scores for the SNP’s main effect and SNP×age interaction. To reduce systematic inflation caused by jointly testing the SNP’s main and SNP×age interaction effects [ 55 , 56 ], we applied a joint meta-analysis approach that takes account of the covariance between their coefficients [ 57 ]. Results were also combined in clinic-based cohorts (NACC and ADNI) and prospective cohorts (FHS, ACT, and ROSMAP) separately to allow for unique associations due to the disparity in age and AD ascertainment between these groups ( Figure S1 ) [ 52 ]. P -values were further corrected by applying the genomic inflation factor ( λ ) estimated for each GWAS and were considered genome-wide significant (GWS) if the corrected P -value was less than 5×10 -8 . Genetic correlations and genome-wide pleiotropy analyses Genetic correlations among the BP and cognitive domain measures were estimated by cross-trait LD score regression [ 58 , 59 ] using meta-analyzed GWAS summary statistics for each trait and LD scores derived previously from European ancestry samples in the 1000 Genomes Project Phase 3 data. We performed genome-wide pleiotropy analyses for paired outcomes of BP and cognitive domain traits by combining summarized GWAS results for the individual traits in the total sample and separately in the clinic-based and prospective cohorts ( Figure S1 ). Using the R package PLACO [ 60 ], we examined the composite null hypothesis that a maximum of one phenotype is associated with a given variant such that rejecting this hypothesis implies that the variant affects both phenotypes and is thus pleiotropic [ 24 ]. The PLACO test statistic is the product of the Z -scores for a given variant estimated from GWAS for each individual phenotype and follows a mixture distribution that allows for the variant to be associated with at most one phenotype [ 60 ]. Potential type I error rate inflation due to Z -scores derived from GWAS for BP and cognitive measures with overlapping samples between two phenotypes [ 61 ] was corrected based on the Pearson correlation among Z -scores for variants with no associations with any trait ( P > 1×10 -4 ), as recommended [ 60 ]. Variants with extreme effects (squared Z -score > 80) for any trait, which could indicate spurious signals of pleiotropy [ 58 , 62 ], were excluded. Differentiation of directional pleiotropy from mediated pleiotropy For top-ranked GWS pleiotropic loci, we conducted Mendelian randomization (MR) using the Egger method [ 63 ] to differentiate directional pleiotropy ( i . e ., SNP’s direct effect on cognition or the effect via confounders other than BP) from mediated pleiotropy ( i . e ., SNP’s effect on cognition through BP). The regression model tested for each locus included the most significant GWS pleiotropic variant and correlated proximal SNPs in LD as instrumental variables. The MR-Egger model was evaluated using GWAS summary statistics for the instrumental variable SNPs and the R package MendelianRandomization [ 64 ]. Differential gene expression analyses We compared the expression of genes located at top-ranked pleiotropic loci among cognitively normal controls ( i . e ., neither clinically nor pathologically diagnosed with AD), pathologically confirmed asymptomatic AD cases ( i . e ., cognitively normal prior to death and thus considered to be resilient), and pathologically confirmed symptomatic AD cases ( i . e ., cognitively impaired or demented prior to death). Genes containing or adjacent (closer than 100 kb) to variants showing GWS evidence of pleiotropy in the SNP main effect, SNP interaction with age, or their joint effects in the total, clinic-based, or prospective cohort samples were targeted. We obtained bulk RNA-sequencing data measured in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) from ROSMAP (195 controls, 172 asymptomatic AD, and 200 symptomatic AD cases) [ 65 ], Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (BUADRC) (35 controls, 20 asymptomatic AD, and 30 symptomatic AD cases) [ 66 ], and FHS (73 controls, 12 asymptomatic AD, and 42 symptomatic AD cases) [ 67 ] participants. Results were adjusted for a false discovery rate (FDR) by applying the Benjamini-Hochberg method [ 68 ] and considered significant if the FDR was less than a threshold of 0.05. Pathway enrichment analyses We conducted pathway enrichment analyses, each of which was seeded with genes containing variants showing evidence of pleiotropy ( P < 1×10 -4 ) in the total sample, clinic-based cohorts, or prospective cohorts using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software (QIAGEN Inc.) [ 69 ]. The Benjamini-Hochberg method [ 68 ] was applied to adjust each canonical pathway’s enrichment P -value in each sample stratum for each pair of traits. Pathways were considered significant if the FDR was less than a threshold of 0.05. Results Basic characteristics Data available for analyses were obtained from 116,075 longitudinal examinations of 25,726 participants with a mean age of 76.5 years, more than half of whom were female (55.4%) and college graduates (59.5%) ( Tables 1 and S1 ). Even though FHS participants were much younger ( P < 0.001) than those in the other cohorts (70.5 vs . 76.5−81.9 years), the mean SBP and PP were significantly higher ( P < 0.001) in FHS participants compared to individuals in NACC, ADNI, and ROSMAP (139.9 vs . 136.2−138.9 mmHg for SBP; 63.5 vs . 61.6−62.2 mmHg for PP), which may be because FHS included untreated hypertensive participants who were recruited longer ago. Participants in the clinic-based cohorts (NACC and ADNI) were slightly younger at the last visit than those in the prospective cohorts (FHS, ACT, and ROSMAP). Compared to prospective cohorts, individuals in the clinic-based cohorts had a significantly higher proportion of MCI or AD cases ( P < 0.001), lower scores for executive function and memory, and higher scores for language ( P < 0.001) at the last visit [ 52 ]. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1. Characteristics of the study sample Phenotypic and genetic correlations As shown in Figure S2 , phenotypic and genetic correlations ( r ) were moderate to high for all pairs of the four BP measures (phenotypic r =0.51−0.88, genetic r =0.43−0.91), except for the DBP and PP (phenotypic r =0.05, genetic r =0.03), and for all pairs of the three cognitive domains (phenotypic r =0.72−0.78, genetic r =0.55−0.73). Predictably, SBP, MAP, and PP were negatively correlated with cognitive domain scores consistently, even though they had weak phenotypic and genetic correlations ranging from -0.16 to -0.04 and -0.07 to -0.01, respectively. Genetic associations with individual BP and cognitive domain scores We identified six GWS BP loci, including SLC7A1 , ULK4 , HOTTIP , IGFBP3 , PIK3CG , and MCTP2 ( Table S2a ), with little evidence of genomic inflation ( λ =1.017−1.076) in the joint testing of the SNP and SNP×age interaction effects across all sample strata ( Figure S3 ). GWS associations of top-ranked SNPs in each BP locus were primarily due to the effect of the SNP rather than the SNP×age interaction and were supported by several adjacent variants in high LD ( Figure S4 and Table S3 ). Previously, we identified GWS associations of individual cognitive domain scores with ULK2 , CDK14 , LINC02712 , PURG , and several established AD loci ( BIN1 , CR1 , MS4A6A , and GRN ) ( Table S2b ) in addition to GWS associations of many SNPs in the APOE region with all cognitive domains [ 52 ]. Pleiotropy for BP and cognitive domain scores We identified GWS pleiotropic associations with SNPs in JPH2 and ULK2 emerging from the total sample and prospective cohorts, respectively ( Tables 2 and S4 ), with no evidence of genomic inflation ( λ =0.868−0.968) in the joint testing of the main SNP and SNP×age interaction effects on pleiotropy between BP and cognitive domain scores across all strata of the sample ( Figure S5 ). The JPH2 association observed between SBP paired with language and rs6031436 ( P Joint =6.09×10 -9 ) in the total sample ( Table 2 ) was supported by multiple GWS SNPs in the same locus ( Figure 1a and Table S5 ). This JPH2 SNP also showed a GWS pleiotropy for PP paired with language ( P Joint =3.25×10 -8 ) in the total sample ( Table 2 ), which was supported by multiple adjacent variants in high LD ( Figure 1b and Table S5 ). In the prospective cohorts, a GWS pleiotropy was observed with ULK2 SNP rs157398 ( P Joint =2.85×10 -8 ) for the pair of DBP and executive function ( Table 2 ), which was supported by many neighboring GWS or suggestive variants ( Figure 2a and Table S5 ). In addition, many SNPs in the APOE region showed GWS pleiotropy for all the pairs of BP and cognitive performance measures across all strata of analyses, particularly in the clinic-based cohorts ( Table S5 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. LocusZoom plots for top-ranked pleiotropic loci emerging from the total sample. (a) rs6031436 and JPH2 variants showing pleiotropy between SBP and language in the total sample, (b) rs6031436 and JPH2 variants showing pleiotropy between PP and language in the total sample, (c) rs263419 and GATA3 variants showing pleiotropy between SBP and language in the total sample, and (d) rs7902306 and SUFU variants showing pleiotropy between DBP and language in the total sample. A purple diamond indicates the top-ranked SNP at each locus. SNPs are color-coded according to their LD ( r 2 ) with the top-ranked SNP in the region. Horizontal dotted lines represent the GWS threshold of P =5×10 -8 . Vertical blue lines indicate locations of the high recombination rate among SNPs at the chromosomal position. Approximate location, transcription direction, and coding portions (exons represented by vertical bars) of genes are shown below the diagram. Mb=megabase, cM=centimorgan. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. LocusZoom plots for top-ranked pleiotropic loci emerging from the clinic-based or prospective cohort samples. (a) rs157398 and ULK2 variants showing pleiotropy between DBP and executive function in the prospective cohorts, (b) rs10518102 and ADAMTS3 variants showing pleiotropy between PP and language in the clinic-based cohorts, (c) rs6707036 and RTN4 variants showing pleiotropy between SBP and language in the prospective cohorts, and (d) rs2168164 and SORBS2 variants showing pleiotropy between PP and memory in the prospective cohorts. A purple diamond indicates the top-ranked SNP at each locus. SNPs are color-coded according to their LD ( r 2 ) with the top-ranked SNP in the region. Horizontal dotted lines represent the GWS threshold of P =5×10 -8 . Vertical blue lines indicate locations of the high recombination rate among SNPs at the chromosomal position. Approximate location, transcription direction, and coding portions (exons represented by vertical bars) of genes are shown below the diagram. Mb=megabase, cM=centimorgan. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 2. GWS pleiotropy between BP and cognitive performance measures (excluding the APOE region) GWS pleiotropy for nine additional loci was identified with the main SNP effect or SNP×age interaction terms ( Tables 2 and S4 ). In the total sample, pleiotropy for the SNP×age interaction effect was observed with GATA3 SNP rs263419 ( Figure 1c ) for SBP paired with language ( P G×Age =1.42×10 -8 ), LOC105371656 SNP rs73050834 ( Figure S6a ) for MAP paired with language ( P G×Age =1.75×10 -8 ), and rs117854720 located between HIF1AN and PAX2 ( Figure S6b ) for MAP paired with executive function ( P G×Age =4.22×10 -8 ) ( Tables 2 and S4 ). The main effect of SUFU SNP rs7902306 was associated with the paired outcomes of DBP and language ( P G =2.10×10 -8 ), a finding that was supported by several variants in high LD ( Figure 1d ). In the clinic-based cohorts, pleiotropy for the main SNP effect was observed with ADAMTS3 SNP rs10518102 ( Figure 2b ) for PP paired with language ( P G =2.37×10 -8 ), and the SNP×age interaction effect of LINC02946 SNP rs10201413 was associated with the paired outcomes of SBP and memory ( P G×Age =3.47×10 -8 ) and PP and memory ( P G×Age =4.25×10 -8 ) ( Figures S6c and S6d ). In the prospective cohorts, pleiotropy for the SNP×age interaction effect was observed with RTN4 SNP rs6707036 ( Figure 2c ) for SBP paired with language ( P G×Age =1.49×10 -8 ) and LOC100128993 SNP rs57127265 ( Figure S6e ) for DBP paired with memory ( P G×Age =2.81×10 - 8 ). The main effect of SORBS2 SNP rs2168164 was also associated with the paired outcomes of PP and memory ( P G =2.33×10 -8 ) ( Figure 2d ). MR-Egger analysis revealed that the influence on cognition of five of the 11 GWS pleiotropic loci, including SUFU ( P =4.12×10 -9 ), RTN4 ( P =5.17×10 -7 ), SORBS2 ( P =4.58×10 -6 ), ADAMTS3 ( P =2.20×10 -2 ), and GATA3 ( P =3.21×10 -2 ), was direct rather than through BP ( Table 3 ). View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 3. Differentiation of the directional pleiotropy of top-ranked genes from the mediated pleiotropy Differentially expressed top-ranked pleiotropic genes Among genes containing or closer than 100 kb to top-ranked GWS pleiotropic SNPs, six genes ( ACTR1A , HIF1AN , ADAMTS3 , RTN4 , SORBS2 , and SUFU ) were significantly differentially expressed in DLPFC from pathologically confirmed AD cases with and without clinical symptoms prior to death compared to that from cognitively and pathologically normal controls ( Figure 3 and Table S6 ). ACTR1A , which contains many high LD variants of the top-ranked SUFU SNP rs7902306, had significantly lower expression levels (FDR=1.27×10 -4 ) in symptomatic AD cases than controls ( Figure 3a ). HIF1AN , located near the top-ranked PAX2 SNP rs117854720, was significantly underexpressed in symptomatic AD cases compared to controls (FDR=4.26×10 -3 ) ( Figure 3b ). ADAMTS3 and RTN4 had significantly lower expression levels in symptomatic AD cases compared to controls (FDR < 1.31×10 -7 ) and resilient AD cases (FDR < 9.78×10 -3 ) ( Figures 3c and 3d ). Expression of SORBS2 was also significantly lower (FDR=1.39×10 -4 ) in symptomatic AD cases compared to controls ( Figure 3e ). SUFU was significantly overexpressed in symptomatic AD cases compared to controls (FDR=3.91×10 -2 ) ( Figure 3f ). None of the top-ranked or suggestive pleiotropic variants were associated with the expression of any of the differentially expressed genes. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Pleiotropic genes significantly differentially expressed in the DLPFC in pathologically diagnosed AD cases with and without clinical symptoms prior to death and cognitively normal controls. Genes shown are significantly differentially expressed in the DLPFC among pathologically confirmed symptomatic AD (SymAD) cases, asymptomatic AD (AsymAD) cases, and cognitively normal controls. Differential expression levels in the DLPFC were estimated and meta-analyzed using the ROSMAP, BUADRC, and FHS datasets. (a) ACTR1A , (b) HIF1AN , (c) ADAMTS3 , (d) RTN4 , (e) SORBS2 , and (f) SUFU . Units on the Y-axis represent log-transformed (log2) expression of genes. *FDR < 0.05, **FDR < 0.01, ***FDR < 0.001. Pathways enriched for top-ranked pleiotropic genes We identified many canonical pathways significantly enriched for genes containing top-ranked pleiotropic variants ( P < 1×10 -4 ) ( Table S7 ), primarily derived from analyses seeded with genes affecting memory paired with SBP or DBP ( Table 4 ). Multiple pathways closely connected to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their downstream signaling pathways were significantly enriched for genes with pleiotropy between SBP and memory (FDR < 1.20×10 -3 ), including orexin signaling, apelin endothelial signaling, P2Y purinergic receptor signaling, protein kinase A (PKA) signaling, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-related ( e . g ., GABAergic) receptor signaling, glutaminergic receptor signaling, Gα12/13 signaling, and signaling by rho family GTPases. We also found significant pathways linked to the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and cardiac hypertrophy (FDR < 1.20×10 -3 ), such as the role of nuclear factor of activated T cells in cardiac hypertrophy, renin-angiotensin signaling, cell junction organization, cardiac hypertrophy signaling, and gap junction signaling. Several pathways related to pro-inflammatory responses of microglia and mast cells were significantly enriched (FDR < 8.91×10 -4 ), including oxytocin signaling, docosahexaenoic acid signaling, leptin signaling, eicosanoid signaling, relaxin signaling, and interleukin-1 signaling. Other pathways significantly enriched for top-ranked pleiotropic gene were related to insulin resistance ( e . g ., apelin pancreas signaling, type II diabetes mellitus signaling, white adipose tissue browning pathway, and insulin receptor signaling) or neuronal development signaling, such as synaptogenesis signaling, gonadotropin-releasing hormone signaling, and endocannabinoid developing neuron pathway. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 4. Pathways significantly enriched for top-ranked pleiotropic genes (with FDR < 0.001) Discussion Variants in multiple genes contribute to both BP and cognitive decline Genome-wide pleiotropy analyses for four BP measures paired with performance scores for three cognitive domains identified GWS pleiotropy with APOE and 11 novel loci. Among the novel loci, the effect on cognition of five ( SUFU , RTN4 , SORBS2 , ADAMTS3 , and GATA3 ) was direct rather than through BP, and six genes ( ACTR1A , HIF1AN , ADAMTS3 , RTN4 , SORBS2 , and SUFU ) containing or closest to the top-ranked GWS pleiotropic SNPs were significantly differentially expressed in DLPFC from pathologically confirmed AD cases with antemortem AD clinical symptoms compared to that from cognitively normal controls and cognitively resilient pathologically confirmed AD cases. We also identified many pathways implicated in high BP and AD/ADRD, which were significantly enriched for genes seeded with top-ranked pleiotropic variants. Our findings were based on time-varying analyses considering repeated measures of BP and cognitive domain scores and their changes over time. Using a model with terms for the SNP main effect and SNP interaction with age, we investigated pleiotropic associations in the total, clinic-based, and prospective cohort samples separately, which enabled us to include data collected at multiple time points and find associations that are age-dependent. Roles of pleiotropic loci in AD/ADRD We identified four loci functionally relevant to processes implicated in AD/ADRD. ADAMTS3 encodes a major proteolytic enzyme that breaks down and inactivates reelin in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus [ 70 ], and reelin plays a crucial role in resilience to AD [ 71 ]. Increased RTN4 expression inhibits the cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by blocking the access of β-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) to APP and thus decreases Aβ production [ 72 ]. Nogo-A, also known as RTN4-A, promotes Aβ secretion via the Nogo-66 receptor/ROCK-dependent BACE1 pathway, leading to the onset and development of AD/ADRD [ 73 ]. Nogo-B, another member of the RTN4 family, regulates endothelial sphingolipid biosynthesis and promotes endothelial dysfunction and high BP [ 74 ]. ULK2 -dependent mitophagy activation is required for synaptic toxicity in cortical neurons and hippocampal CA1 neurons, triggered by AMP-activated protein kinase overactivated by Aβ42 oligomers [ 75 ]. We also identified a GWS association of DBP with ULK4 , another member of the ULK family. The fusion of a duplication of several ULK4 exons with a partial duplication of neighboring gene CHRNA7 [ 76 ] forms CHRFAM7A , a negative regulator of alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7nAChR) which has a high affinity for Aβ and plays a role in Aβ-induced neuroinflammation [ 77 ]. CHRFAM7A reduces Aβ uptake via α7nAChR and acts as an immune switch that shifts the α7nAChR from anti-inflammatory to pro-inflammatory, particularly in microglia-like cells [ 77 ]. HIF1AN encodes an inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) whose activation leads to excessive Aβ deposition and tau hyperphosphorylation by abnormally cleaving APP and inhibiting Aβ degradation [ 78 ]. HIF-1α also controls BP homeostasis, and the loss of HIF-1α in vascular smooth muscle (VSM) cells leads to hypertension in vivo [ 79 ]. GATA3 and SUFU are functionally relevant to the immune system ( e . g ., pro-inflammatory signaling activation and inflammatory responses), which may enhance neuroinflammatory responses. GATA3 has been associated with female-specific cognitive resilience to AD pathology [ 80 ] and encodes a transcription factor that controls T helper 2 cells which produce Aβ auto-antibodies, alleviate Aβ deposition, and are therefore protective against AD [ 81 ]. GATA3 activates Tie2 promotor and regulates angiopoietin-1/Tie2 signaling, inhibition of which may result in endothelial dysfunction [ 82 ]. SUFU encodes a negative regulator of the sonic hedgehog signaling pathway modulating immune responses [ 83 ]. ACTR1A located about 100 bp upstream of SUFU is linked to retrograde axonal transport [ 84 ], dysregulation of which is known to be an early event in AD/ADRD [ 85 ]. SUFU and ACTR1A also have been linked to BP in a large trans-ethnic GWAS [ 13 ]. JPH2 plays a critical role in maintaining the effective flux of calcium ions [ 86 ], dysregulation of which is related to neuroinflammatory signaling in neurons [ 87 ], microglia [ 88 ], and astrocytes [ 89 ]. Downregulated JPH2 expression is also linked to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [ 90 ] and increases the risk of AD/ADRD by about 50% [ 91 ]. LINC02946 encodes a long intergenic non-protein coding RNA that is not expressed in brain, however it is located 150 kb upstream of the most proximate protein-coding gene, NCK2 , a recently identified AD GWAS locus [ 92 ]. Roles of SORBS2 , LOC105371656 , and LOC100128993 in mechanisms of AD/ADRD or neuroinflammation are unclear at this time. Links of abnormal BP and AD to endothelial dysfunction and neuroinflammation Analyses of biological pathways and gene networks based on top-ranked genes with pleiotropic effects on BP and cognitive measures identified significant pathways involved in GPCR signaling, RAS, and pro-inflammatory responses. GPCRs have a key role in regulating BACE1 and are involved in the pathogenesis of AD/ADRD [ 93 ]. Multiple studies highlighted the vulnerability of GABAergic system in the cerebrospinal fluid of AD patients [ 94 ] and the role of PKA dysregulation in AD pathogenesis [ 95 ]. GPCRs expressed in endothelial and VSM cells also contribute to maintaining vascular homeostasis and play a critical role in BP regulation [ 96 ]. RAS contributes to endothelial dysfunction that exacerbates hypertensive conditions and leads to neuroinflammatory responses [ 22 , 97 , 98 ]. Pro-inflammatory responses of microglia may trigger neuroinflammation and promote AD/ADRD pathogenesis [ 99 , 100 ], and pro-inflammatory cytokines accumulated in vessels and kidneys induce vascular and renal damage, promoting a progressive increase in BP [ 101 ]. Interestingly, most significant pathways seeded with top-ranked pleiotropic genes were implicated in the memory domain, which is reasonable because memory impairment is one of the most prominent cognitive features in AD/ADRD. The potential mechanistic links between late-life BP changes and AD are evident in many studies and imply the existence of shared genetics between BP and cognitive performance, also tangled with immune responses. A late-life PP increase is mainly caused by arterial stiffness [ 102 ] and is associated with endothelial dysfunction [ 103 ]. Under normal conditions, endothelium balances the release of vasoconstrictors and vasodilators to regulate vascular tone and blood flow (BF) [ 104 ] in response to shear stress ( i . e ., the BF-mediated frictional force exerted on the vessel wall [ 105 ]). Under chronic hypertensive conditions, however, the release of a crucial vasodilator nitric oxide (NO) is depressed [ 106 ], and endothelium loses the ability to maintain vascular homeostasis. This endothelial dysfunction is mainly due to activated NADH/NADPH oxidase and the RAS, leading to arterial superoxide overproduction and endothelium-derived NO reduction [ 97 ]. Moreover, excessive shear stress or high BP-induced endothelial dysfunction exacerbates hypertensive conditions and accelerates the infiltration of peripheral immune cells, originating outside the central nervous system, into the brain by disturbing the blood-brain barrier and activating pro-inflammatory signaling [ 22 , 98 ], which leads to neuroinflammatory responses implicated in AD [ 107 , 108 ] and results in the accumulation of neurotoxic Aβ in the brain [ 109 ]. Pleiotropic loci may contribute to cognitive resilience and inflammation Expression of five genes ( ACTR1A , HIF1AN , ADAMTS3 , RTN4 , and SORBS2 ) containing GWS pleiotropic SNPs was highest in controls, intermediate in cognitively resilient AD cases, and lowest in symptomatic AD cases, suggesting that they may impact the development of AD pathology rather than cognitive impairment. We also found significantly different expressions of ADAMTS3 and RTN4 between AD cases with and without clinical symptoms, suggesting their involvement in cognitive resilience, noting that ADAMTS3 was previously linked to RELN which has been implicated in resilience to AD [ 70 , 71 ]. Effects of some pleiotropic loci are age-dependent We applied models with terms for the main SNP and SNP×age interaction effects and jointly tested them to increase the power to detect genetic associations and pleiotropy between BP and cognitive performance measures. However, the interpretation of results emerging from the joint test combining the main SNP and SNP×age interaction effects is not straightforward. Among GWS loci showing pleiotropy between BP and cognitive measures, five loci ( JPH2 , ULK2 , SUFU , ADAMTS3 , and SORBS2 ) had GWS main SNP effects, suggesting these loci may affect mechanisms that influence BP and cognitive performance rather than changes in these measures over time. In contrast, other loci ( GATA3 , LOC105371656 , PAX2 , LINC02946 , RTN4 , and LOC100128993 ) showing significant SNP×age interaction effects may affect changes in BP or cognitive measures over time. Considering there were no significant SNP×age interactions in the GWAS of individual BP traits, pairing BP (which typically increases with age) with cognitive performance (which typically decreases with age) may have afforded greater power to detect loci whose effects are age-dependent. Associations with ADAMTS3 and LINC02946 were observed only in the clinic-based cohorts in which the onset of AD symptoms on average occurred at a younger age than in the prospective cohorts. Conversely, associations with ULK2 , RTN4 , SORBS2 , and LOC100128993 were observed only in the prospective cohorts, implying these loci influence AD onset at a later age or may be associated with age-related cognitive decline that is not specific to AD/ADRD processes. Study limitations Our study has several limitations. Except for FHS participants, individuals included in this study were much older at the time of enrollment than those in most BP GWAS. Hence, associations with loci whose effects on BP start in young or middle adulthood may have been missed. Despite including several large longitudinal cohorts, the sample was considerably smaller compared to samples included in BP or AD GWAS, and thus the power for testing the main SNP and SNP×age interaction effects were reduced. Also, a large portion of the participants were examined only once (FHS: 28.6%, ACT: 12.4%, ROSMAP: 7.4%, NACC: 19.3%, and ADNI: 13.0%), and those individuals did not contribute to analyses of changes over time. Furthermore, the interpretation of some of our findings is complicated because they may be implicate multiple mechanisms affecting BP and cognitive performance, including their changes over time. Another concern is the lack of correction for conducting 36 genome-wide pleiotropy analyses ( i . e ., 12 pairs of BP and cognitive measures in the total, clinic-based, and prospective cohort samples). Correction for 36 analyses would elevate the GWS threshold to P < 1.39×10 -9 , but this corrected threshold may be too conservative because there are strong correlations among the three cognitive domain scores, among the four BP measures, and between the separately ascertained cohorts and total sample. Finally, our findings are specific to non-Hispanic white participants and should be replicated in other population groups to generalize them more broadly. Conclusions Our findings provide additional insight into the underlying mechanisms of hypertension and AD/ADRD, particularly those involving neuroinflammation. Ongoing efforts to harmonize BP and cognitive performance measures across several cohorts would likely yield additional datasets for discovering new, replicating, and generalizing associations with loci influencing measures of both BP and cognitive performance. Further studies are needed to identify mechanisms underlying pleiotropic associations. Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. Funding This work was supported in part by NIH grants U19-AG068753, R01-AG048927, U54-AG052427, U01-AG058654, U01-AG032984, RF1-AG057519, U01-AG062602, P30-AG072878, U24-AG074855, U01-AG068057, and R01-AG059716. Conflicts of Interest Dr. Hohman serves on the advisory board for Vivid Genomics, deputy editor for Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, and senior associate editor for Alzheimer’s & Dementia. Acknowledgements Biological samples and associated phenotypic data used in primary data analyses were stored at study investigator institutions and at the National Cell Repository for Alzheimer’s Disease (NCRAD, U24-AG021886) at Indiana University funded by the National Institute on Aging (NIA). Associated phenotypic data used in primary and secondary data analyses were provided by the study investigators, the NIA funded Alzheimer’s Disease Centers (ADCs), the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC, U01-AG016976), the National Institute on Aging Genetics of Alzheimer’s Disease Data Storage Site (NIAGADS, U24-AG041689) at the University of Pennsylvania, funded by NIA, and the Religious Orders Study/Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP, P30-AG10161, P30-AG72975, R01-AG15819, R01-AG17917, U01-AG46152, and U01-AG61356). Phenotypic data were harmonized by the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project Phenotype Harmonization Consortium (ADSP-PHC, U24-AG074855, U01-AG068057 and R01-AG059716), funded by NIA. This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Library of Medicine. Contributors to the genetic and phenotypic data included the study investigators on projects that were individually funded by NIA and other NIH institutes, and by private United States organizations, foreign governmental organizations, or nongovernmental organizations. We also acknowledge the following investigators who assembled and characterized participants of cohorts included in this study. Adult Changes in Thought: James D. Bowen, Paul K. Crane, Gail P. Jarvik, C. Dirk Keene, Eric B. Larson, W. William Lee, Wayne C. McCormick, Susan M. McCurry, Shubhabrata Mukherjee, Katie Rose Richmire Chicago Health and Aging Project: Philip L. De Jager, Denis A. Evans. Estudio Familiar de la Influencia Genetica en Alzheimer: Sandra Barral, Rafael Lantigua, Richard Mayeux, Martin Medrano, Dolly Reyes-Dumeyer, Badri Vardarajan. Framingham Heart Study: Ting Fang Alvin Ang, Hugo J. Aparicio, Rhoda Au, Sanford Auerbach, Alexa S. Beiser, Anita DeStefano, Sherral Devine, Lindsay A. Farrer, Jesse Mez, Jose Raphael Romero, Sudha Seshadri. Genetic Differences: Duane Beekly, James Bowen, Walter A. Kukull, Eric B. Larson, Wayne McCormick, Gerard D. Schellenberg, Linda Teri. Mayo Clinic: Minerva M. Carrasquillo, Dennis W. Dickson, Nilufer Ertekin-Taner, Neill R. Graff-Radford, Joseph E. Parisi, Ronald C. Petersen, Steven G. Younkin. Mayo PD: Gary W. Beecham, Dennis W. Dickson, Ranjan Duara, Nilufer Ertekin-Taner, Tatiana M. Foroud, Neill R. Graff-Radford, Richard B. Lipton, Joseph E. Parisi, Ronald C. Petersen, Bill Scott, Jeffery M. Vance. Memory and Aging Project: David A. Bennett, Philip L. De Jager. Multi-Institutional Research in Alzheimer’s Genetic Epidemiology Study: Sanford Auerbach, Helan Chui, Jaeyoon Chung, L. Adrienne Cupples, Charles DeCarli, Ranjan Duara, Martin Farlow, Lindsay A. Farrer, Robert Friedland, Rodney C.P. Go, Robert C. Green, Patrick Griffith, John Growdon, Gyungah R. Jun, Walter Kukull, Alexander Kurz, Mark Logue, Kathryn L. Lunetta, Thomas Obisesan, Helen Petrovitch, Marwan Sabbagh, A. Dessa Sadovnick, Magda Tsolaki. National Cell Repository for Alzheimer’s Disease: Kelley M. Faber, Tatiana M. Foroud. National Institute on Aging (NIA) Late Onset Alzheimer’s Disease Family Study: David A. Bennett, Sarah Bertelsen, Thomas D. Bird, Bradley F. Boeve, Carlos Cruchaga, Kelley Faber, Martin Farlow, Tatiana M. Foroud, Alison M. Goate, Neill R. Graff-Radford, Richard Mayeux, Ruth Ottman, Dolly Reyes-Dumeyer, Roger Rosenberg, Daniel Schaid, Robert A. Sweet, Giuseppe Tosto, Debby Tsuang, Badri Vardarajan. NIA Alzheimer Disease Centers: Erin Abner, Marilyn S. Albert, Roger L. Albin, Liana G. Apostolova, Sanjay Asthana, Craig S. Atwood, Lisa L. Barnes, Thomas G. Beach, David A. Bennett, Eileen H. Bigio, Thomas D. Bird, Deborah Blacker, Adam Boxer, James B. Brewer, James R. Burke, Jeffrey M. Burns, Joseph D. Buxbaum, Nigel J. Cairns, Chuanhai Cao, Cynthia M. Carlsson, Richard J. Caselli, Helena C. Chui, Carlos Cruchaga, Mony de Leon, Charles DeCarli, Malcolm Dick, Dennis W. Dickson, Nilufer Ertekin-Taner, David W. Fardo, Martin R. Farlow, Lindsay A. Farrer, Steven Ferris, Tatiana M. Foroud, Matthew P. Frosch, Douglas R. Galasko, Marla Gearing, David S. Geldmacher, Daniel H. Geschwind, Bernardino Ghetti, Carey Gleason, Alison M. Goate, Teresa Gomez-Isla, Thomas Grabowski, Neill R. Graff-Radford, John H. Growdon, Lawrence S. Honig, Ryan M. Huebinger, Matthew J. Huentelman, Christine M. Hulette, Bradley T. Hyman, Suman Jayadev, Lee-Way Jin, Sterling Johnson, M. Ilyas Kamboh, Anna Karydas, Jeffrey A. Kaye, C. Dirk Keene, Ronald Kim, Neil W. Kowall, Joel H. Kramer, Frank M. LaFerla, James J. Lah, Allan I. Levey, Ge Li, Andrew P. Lieberman, Oscar L. Lopez, Constantine G. Lyketsos, Daniel C. Marson, Ann C. McKee, Marsel Mesulam, Jesse Mez, Bruce L. Miller, Carol A. Miller, Abhay Moghekar, John C. Morris, John M. Olichney, Joseph E. Parisi, Henry L. Paulson, Elaine Peskind, Ronald C. Petersen, Aimee Pierce, Wayne W. Poon, Luigi Puglielli, Joseph F. Quinn, Ashok Raj, Murray Raskind, Eric M. Reiman, Barry Reisberg, Robert A. Rissman, Erik D. Roberson, Howard J. Rosen, Roger N. Rosenberg, Martin Sadowski, Mark A. Sager, David P. Salmon, Mary Sano, Andrew J. Saykin, Julie A. Schneider, Lon S. Schneider, William W. Seeley, Scott Small, Amanda G. Smith, Robert A. Stern, Russell H. Swerdlow, Rudolph E. Tanzi, Sarah E. Tomaszewski Farias, John Q. Trojanowski, Juan C. Troncoso, Debby W. Tsuang, Vivianna M. Van Deerlin, Linda J. Van Eldik, Harry V. Vinters, Jean Paul Vonsattel, Jen Chyong Wang, Sandra Weintraub, Kathleen A. Welsh-Bohmer, Shawn Westaway, Thomas S. Wingo, Thomas Wisniewski, David A. Wolk, Randall L. Woltjer, Steven G. Younkin, Lei Yu, Chang-En Yu. Religious Orders Study: David A. Bennett, Philip L. De Jager. Texas Alzheimer’s Research and Care Consortium: Perrie Adams, Alyssa Aguirre, Lisa Alvarez, Gayle Ayres, Robert C. Barber, John Bertelson, Sarah Brisebois, Scott Chasse, Munro Culum, Eveleen Darby, John C. DeToledo, Thomas J. Fairchild, James R. Hall, John Hart, Michelle Hernandez, Ryan Huebinger, Leigh Johnson, Kim Johnson, Aisha Khaleeq, Janice Knebl, Laura J. Lacritz, Douglas Mains, Paul Massman, Trung Nguyen, Sid O’Bryant, Marcia Ory, Raymond Palmer, Valory Pavlik, David Paydarfar, Victoria Perez, Marsha Polk, Mary Quiceno, Joan S. Reisch, Monica Rodriguear, Roger Rosenberg, Donald R. Royall, Janet Smith, Alan Stevens, Jeffrey L. Tilson, April Wiechmann, Kirk C. Wilhelmsen, Benjamin Williams, Henrick Wilms, Martin Woon. University of Miami: Larry D. Adams, Gary W. Beecham, Regina M. Carney, Katrina Celis, Michael L. Cuccaro, Kara L. Hamilton-Nelson, James Jaworski, Brian W. Kunkle, Eden R. Martin, Margaret A. Pericak-Vance, Farid Rajabli, Michael Schmidt, Jeffery M Vance. University of Toronto: Ekaterina Rogaeva, Peter St. George-Hyslop. University of Washington Families: Thomas D. Bird, Olena Korvatska, Wendy Raskind, Chang-En Yu. Vanderbilt University: John H. Dougherty, Harry E. Gwirtsman, Jonathan L. Haines, Angela Jefferson. Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project: Adam Brickman, Rafael Lantigua, Jennifer Manly, Richard Mayeux, Christiane Reitz, Nicole Schupf, Yaakov Stern, Giuseppe Tosto, Badri Vardarajan. Abbreviations α7nAChR alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor Aβ amyloid-β ACT Adult Changes in Thought AD Alzheimer’s disease ADNI Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative ADRD Alzheimer’s disease related dementias APP amyloid precursor protein BACE1 β-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 BF blood flow BMI body mass index BP blood pressure BUADRC Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center DBP diastolic blood pressure DLPFC dorsolateral prefrontal cortex FDR false discovery rate FHS Framingham Heart Study GABA γ-aminobutyric acid GPCR G protein-coupled receptor GRCh38 Genome Research Consortium human build 38 GRM genetic relationship matrix GWAS genome-wide association study GWS genome-wide significant HIF-1α hypoxia-inducible factor-1α LD linkage disequilibrium MAF minor allele frequency MAP mean arterial pressure MCI mild cognitive impairment MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination MR Mendelian randomization NACC National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center NIA National Institute on Aging NO nitric oxide NP neuropsychological PC principal component PKA protein kinase A PP pulse pressure QC quality control RAS renin-angiotensin system ROSMAP Religious Orders Study/Rush Memory and Aging Project SBP systolic blood pressure SE standard error SNP single nucleotide polymorphism TOPMed Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine VSM vascular smooth muscle References 1. ↵ Livingston G , Huntley J , Sommerlad A , Ames D , Ballard C , Banerjee S , Brayne C , Burns A , Cohen-Mansfield J , Cooper C , et al : Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the lancet commission . Lancet 2020 , 396 : 413 – 446 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. ↵ Arvanitakis Z , Shah RC , Bennett DA : Diagnosis and management of dementia: Review . JAMA 2019 , 322 : 1589 – 1599 . OpenUrl PubMed 3. ↵ McGrath ER , Beiser AS , DeCarli C , Plourde KL , Vasan RS , Greenberg SM , Seshadri S: Blood pressure from mid-to late life and risk of incident dementia . Neurology 2017 , 89 : 2447 – 2454 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. ↵ Abell JG , Kivimaki M , Dugravot A , Tabak AG , Fayosse A , Shipley M , Sabia S , Singh-Manoux A : Association between systolic blood pressure and dementia in the whitehall ii cohort study: Role of age, duration, and threshold used to define hypertension . Eur Heart J 2018 , 39 : 3119 – 3125 . OpenUrl PubMed 5. ↵ Gottesman RF , Schneider AL , Albert M , Alonso A , Bandeen-Roche K , Coker L , Coresh J , Knopman D , Power MC , Rawlings A , et al: Midlife hypertension and 20-year cognitive change: The atherosclerosis risk in communities neurocognitive study . JAMA Neurol 2014 , 71 : 1218 – 1227 . OpenUrl PubMed 6. ↵ Walker KA , Power MC , Gottesman RF : Defining the relationship between hypertension, cognitive decline, and dementia: A review . Curr Hypertens Rep 2017 , 19 : 24 . 7. ↵ Forette F , Seux ML , Staessen JA , Thijs L , Babarskiene MR , Babeanu S , Bossini A , Fagard R , Gil-Extremera B , Laks T , et al : The prevention of dementia with antihypertensive treatment: New evidence from the systolic hypertension in europe (syst-eur) study . Arch Intern Med 2002 , 162 : 2046 – 2052 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 8. ↵ Peters R , Beckett N , Forette F , Tuomilehto J , Clarke R , Ritchie C , Waldman A , Walton I , Poulter R , Ma S , et al : Incident dementia and blood pressure lowering in the hypertension in the very elderly trial cognitive function assessment (hyvet-cog): A double-blind, placebo controlled trial . Lancet Neurol 2008 , 7 : 683 – 689 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 9. ↵ Xu W , Tan L , Wang HF , Jiang T , Tan MS , Tan L , Zhao QF , Li JQ , Wang J , Yu JT: Meta-analysis of modifiable risk factors for alzheimer’s disease . J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015 , 86 : 1299 – 1306 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 10. ↵ Ou YN , Tan CC , Shen XN , Xu W , Hou XH , Dong Q , Tan L , Yu JT : Blood pressure and risks of cognitive impairment and dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 209 prospective studies . Hypertension 2020 , 76 : 217 – 225 . OpenUrl CrossRef 11. ↵ Franklin SS , Gustin Wt , Wong ND , Larson MG , Weber MA , Kannel WB , Levy D: Hemodynamic patterns of age-related changes in blood pressure. The framingham heart study . Circulation 1997 , 96 : 308 – 315 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 12. ↵ Evangelou E , Warren HR , Mosen-Ansorena D , Mifsud B , Pazoki R , Gao H , Ntritsos G , Dimou N , Cabrera CP , Karaman I , et al : Genetic analysis of over 1 million people identifies 535 new loci associated with blood pressure traits . Nat Genet 2018 , 50 : 1412 – 1425 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. ↵ Giri A , Hellwege JN , Keaton JM , Park J , Qiu C , Warren HR , Torstenson ES , Kovesdy CP , Sun YV , Wilson OD , et al : Trans-ethnic association study of blood pressure determinants in over 750,000 individuals . Nat Genet 2019 , 51 : 51 – 62 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 14. ↵ Keaton JM , Kamali Z , Xie T , Vaez A , Williams A , Goleva SB , Ani A , Evangelou E , Hellwege JN , Yengo L , et al : Genome-wide analysis in over 1 million individuals of european ancestry yields improved polygenic risk scores for blood pressure traits . Nat Genet 2024 . 15. ↵ Jansen IE , Savage JE , Watanabe K , Bryois J , Williams DM , Steinberg S , Sealock J , Karlsson IK , Hagg S , Athanasiu L , et al : Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing alzheimer’s disease risk . Nat Genet 2019 , 51 : 404 – 413 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 16. Kunkle BW , Grenier-Boley B , Sims R , Bis JC , Damotte V , Naj AC , Boland A , Vronskaya M , van der Lee SJ , Amlie-Wolf A , et al : Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates abeta, tau, immunity and lipid processing . Nat Genet 2019 , 51 : 414 – 430 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 17. Wightman DP , Jansen IE , Savage JE , Shadrin AA , Bahrami S , Holland D , Rongve A , Borte S , Winsvold BS , Drange OK , et al : A genome-wide association study with 1,126,563 individuals identifies new risk loci for alzheimer’s disease . Nat Genet 2021 , 53 : 1276 – 1282 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 18. ↵ Bellenguez C , Kucukali F , Jansen IE , Kleineidam L , Moreno-Grau S , Amin N , Naj AC , Campos-Martin R , Grenier-Boley B , Andrade V , et al : New insights into the genetic etiology of alzheimer’s disease and related dementias . Nat Genet 2022 , 54 : 412 – 436 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 19. ↵ Sullivan M , Deng HW , Greenbaum J: Identification of genetic loci shared between alzheimer’s disease and hypertension . Mol Genet Genomics 2022 , 297 : 1661 – 1670 . OpenUrl PubMed 20. ↵ Tang C , Ma Y , Lei X , Ding Y , Yang S , He D : Hypertension linked to alzheimer’s disease via stroke: Mendelian randomization . Sci Rep 2023 , 13 : 21606 . 21. ↵ Lane CA , Barnes J , Nicholas JM , Sudre CH , Cash DM , Parker TD , Malone IB , Lu K , James SN , Keshavan A , et al : Associations between blood pressure across adulthood and late-life brain structure and pathology in the neuroscience substudy of the 1946 british birth cohort (insight 46): An epidemiological study . Lancet Neurol 2019 , 18 : 942 – 952 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 22. ↵ Youwakim J , Girouard H : Inflammation: A mediator between hypertension and neurodegenerative diseases . Am J Hypertens 2021 , 34 : 1014 – 1030 . OpenUrl PubMed 23. ↵ Sible IJ , Yew B , Jang JY , Alitin JPM , Li Y , Gaubert A , Nguyen A , Dutt S , Blanken AE , Ho JK , et al : Blood pressure variability and plasma alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in older adults . Sci Rep 2022 , 12 : 17197 . 24. ↵ Solovieff N , Cotsapas C , Lee PH , Purcell SM , Smoller JW : Pleiotropy in complex traits: Challenges and strategies . Nat Rev Genet 2013 , 14 : 483 – 495 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 25. ↵ Hu H , Meng L , Bi YL , Zhang W , Xu W , Shen XN , Ou YN , Ma YH , Dong Q , Tan L , Yu JT : Tau pathologies mediate the association of blood pressure with cognitive impairment in adults without dementia: The cable study . Alzheimers Dement 2022 , 18 : 53 – 64 . OpenUrl PubMed 26. ↵ Svenningsson AL , Bocancea DI , Stomrud E , van Loenhoud A , Barkhof F , Mattsson-Carlgren N , Palmqvist S , Hansson O , Ossenkoppele R: Biological mechanisms of resilience to tau pathology in alzheimer’s disease . Alzheimers Res Ther 2024 , 16 : 221 . 27. ↵ Dawber TR , Kannel WB: The framingham study. An epidemiological approach to coronary heart disease . Circulation 1966 , 34 : 553 – 555 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text 28. Feinleib M , Kannel WB , Garrison RJ , McNamara PM , Castelli WP: The framingham offspring study. Design and preliminary data . Prev Med 1975 , 4 : 518 – 525 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 29. ↵ Splansky GL , Corey D , Yang Q , Atwood LD , Cupples LA , Benjamin EJ , D’Agostino RB , Sr. , Fox CS , Larson MG , Murabito JM , et al : The third generation cohort of the national heart, lung, and blood institute’s framingham heart study: Design, recruitment, and initial examination . Am J Epidemiol 2007 , 165 : 1328 – 1335 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 30. ↵ Kukull WA , Higdon R , Bowen JD , McCormick WC , Teri L , Schellenberg GD , van Belle G , Jolley L , Larson EB : Dementia and alzheimer disease incidence: A prospective cohort study . Arch Neurol 2002 , 59 : 1737 – 1746 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 31. ↵ Bennett DA , Buchman AS , Boyle PA , Barnes LL , Wilson RS , Schneider JA : Religious orders study and rush memory and aging project . J Alzheimers Dis 2018 , 64 : S161 – S189 . OpenUrl CrossRef 32. ↵ Beekly DL , Ramos EM , van Belle G , Deitrich W , Clark AD , Jacka ME , Kukull WA , Centers NI-AsD: The national alzheimer’s coordinating center (nacc) database: An alzheimer disease database . Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2004 , 18 : 270 – 277 . OpenUrl PubMed 33. ↵ Beekly DL , Ramos EM , Lee WW , Deitrich WD , Jacka ME , Wu J , Hubbard JL , Koepsell TD , Morris JC , Kukull WA , Centers NIAAsD: The national alzheimer’s coordinating center (nacc) database: The uniform data set . Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2007 , 21 : 249 – 258 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 34. ↵ Mueller SG , Weiner MW , Thal LJ , Petersen RC , Jack C , Jagust W , Trojanowski JQ , Toga AW , Beckett L: The alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative . Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2005 , 15 : 869 – 877 , xi-xii. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 35. ↵ Petersen RC , Aisen PS , Beckett LA , Donohue MC , Gamst AC , Harvey DJ , Jack CR , Jr. , Jagust WJ , Shaw LM , Toga AW , et al : Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (adni): Clinical characterization . Neurology 2010 , 74 : 201 – 209 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 36. ↵ Cui JS , Hopper JL , Harrap SB: Antihypertensive treatments obscure familial contributions to blood pressure variation . Hypertension 2003 , 41 : 207 – 210 . OpenUrl CrossRef 37. ↵ Whelton PK , Carey RM , Aronow WS , Casey DE , Jr. , Collins KJ , Dennison Himmelfarb C , DePalma SM , Gidding S , Jamerson KA , Jones DW , et al : 2017 acc/aha/aapa/abc/acpm/ags/apha/ash/aspc/nma/pcna guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines . Hypertension 2018 , 71 : e13 – e115 . OpenUrl CrossRef 38. ↵ Seshadri S , Wolf PA , Beiser A , Au R , McNulty K , White R , D’Agostino RB: Lifetime risk of dementia and alzheimer’s disease. The impact of mortality on risk estimates in the framingham study . Neurology 1997 , 49 : 1498 – 1504 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 39. ↵ Seshadri S , Beiser A , Au R , Wolf PA , Evans DA , Wilson RS , Petersen RC , Knopman DS , Rocca WA , Kawas CH , et al : Operationalizing diagnostic criteria for alzheimer’s disease and other age-related cognitive impairment-part 2 . Alzheimers Dement 2011 , 7 : 35 – 52 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 40. ↵ Mukherjee S , Mez J , Trittschuh EH , Saykin AJ , Gibbons LE , Fardo DW , Wessels M , Bauman J , Moore M , Choi SE , et al : Genetic data and cognitively defined late-onset alzheimer’s disease subgroups . Mol Psychiatry 2020 , 25 : 2942 – 2951 . OpenUrl PubMed 41. Mukherjee S , Choi SE , Lee ML , Scollard P , Trittschuh EH , Mez J , Saykin AJ , Gibbons LE , Sanders RE , Zaman AF , et al : Cognitive domain harmonization and cocalibration in studies of older adults . Neuropsychology 2023 , 37 : 409 – 423 . OpenUrl PubMed 42. ↵ Scollard P , Choi SE , Lee ML , Mukherjee S , Trittschuh EH , Sanders RE , Gibbons LE , Joshi P , Devine S , Au R , et al : Ceiling effects and differential measurement precision across calibrated cognitive scores in the framingham study . Neuropsychology 2023 , 37 : 383 – 397 . OpenUrl PubMed 43. ↵ Muthén LK , Muthén BO : Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide (version 8). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén 2017 . 44. ↵ Taliun D , Harris DN , Kessler MD , Carlson J , Szpiech ZA , Torres R , Taliun SAG , Corvelo A , Gogarten SM , Kang HM , et al : Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the nhlbi topmed program . Nature 2021 , 590 : 290 – 299 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 45. ↵ Gogarten SM , Sofer T , Chen H , Yu C , Brody JA , Thornton TA , Rice KM , Conomos MP: Genetic association testing using the genesis r/bioconductor package . Bioinformatics 2019 , 35 : 5346 – 5348 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 46. ↵ Sinnwell JP , Therneau TM , Schaid DJ: The kinship2 r package for pedigree data . Hum Hered 2014 , 78 : 91 – 93 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 47. ↵ Manichaikul A , Mychaleckyj JC , Rich SS , Daly K , Sale M , Chen WM: Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies . Bioinformatics 2010 , 26 : 2867 – 2873 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 48. Conomos MP , Miller MB , Thornton TA: Robust inference of population structure for ancestry prediction and correction of stratification in the presence of relatedness . Genet Epidemiol 2015 , 39 : 276 – 293 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 49. ↵ Conomos MP , Reiner AP , Weir BS , Thornton TA: Model-free estimation of recent genetic relatedness . Am J Hum Genet 2016 , 98 : 127 – 148 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 50. ↵ Chen H , Wang C , Conomos MP , Stilp AM , Li Z , Sofer T , Szpiro AA , Chen W , Brehm JM , Celedon JC , et al : Control for population structure and relatedness for binary traits in genetic association studies via logistic mixed models . Am J Hum Genet 2016 , 98 : 653 – 666 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 51. ↵ Wang X , Lim E , Liu CT , Sung YJ , Rao DC , Morrison AC , Boerwinkle E , Manning AK , Chen H: Efficient gene-environment interaction tests for large biobank-scale sequencing studies . Genet Epidemiol 2020 , 44 : 908 – 923 . OpenUrl PubMed 52. ↵ Kang M , Ang TFA , Devine SA , Sherva R , Mukherjee S , Trittschuh EH , Gibbons LE , Scollard P , Lee M , Choi SE , et al : A genome-wide search for pleiotropy in more than 100,000 harmonized longitudinal cognitive domain scores . Mol Neurodegener 2023 , 18 : 40 . 53. ↵ Shieh G : Clarifying the role of mean centring in multicollinearity of interaction effects. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2011 , 64 : 462-477 . OpenUrl PubMed 54. ↵ Willer CJ , Li Y , Abecasis GR : Metal: Fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans . Bioinformatics 2010 , 26 : 2190 – 2191 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 55. ↵ Voorman A , Lumley T , McKnight B , Rice K: Behavior of qq-plots and genomic control in studies of gene-environment interaction . PLoS One 2011 , 6 : e19416 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 56. ↵ Almli LM , Duncan R , Feng H , Ghosh D , Binder EB , Bradley B , Ressler KJ , Conneely KN , Epstein MP : Correcting systematic inflation in genetic association tests that consider interaction effects: Application to a genome-wide association study of posttraumatic stress disorder . JAMA Psychiatry 2014 , 71 : 1392 – 1399 . OpenUrl PubMed 57. ↵ Manning AK , LaValley M , Liu CT , Rice K , An P , Liu Y , Miljkovic I , Rasmussen-Torvik L , Harris TB , Province MA , et al : Meta-analysis of gene-environment interaction: Joint estimation of snp and snp x environment regression coefficients . Genet Epidemiol 2011 , 35 : 11 – 18 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 58. ↵ Bulik-Sullivan BK , Loh PR , Finucane HK , Ripke S , Yang J , Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Patterson N, Daly MJ, Price AL, Neale BM: Ld score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies . Nat Genet 2015 , 47 : 291 – 295 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 59. ↵ Bulik-Sullivan B , Finucane HK , Anttila V , Gusev A , Day FR , Loh PR , ReproGen Consortium , Psychiatric Genomics Consortium , Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa of the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Duncan L, et al: An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits . Nat Genet 2015 , 47 : 1236 – 1241 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 60. ↵ Ray D , Chatterjee N: A powerful method for pleiotropic analysis under composite null hypothesis identifies novel shared loci between type 2 diabetes and prostate cancer . PLoS Genet 2020 , 16 : e1009218 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 61. ↵ Lin DY , Sullivan PF: Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies with overlapping subjects . Am J Hum Genet 2009 , 85 : 862 – 872 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 62. ↵ Zheng J , Erzurumluoglu AM , Elsworth BL , Kemp JP , Howe L , Haycock PC , Hemani G , Tansey K , Laurin C , Early Genetics and Lifecourse Epidemiology Eczema Consortium, et al: Ld hub: A centralized database and web interface to perform ld score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level gwas data for snp heritability and genetic correlation analysis . Bioinformatics 2017 , 33 : 272 – 279 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 63. ↵ Bowden J , Davey Smith G , Burgess S : Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: Effect estimation and bias detection through egger regression . Int J Epidemiol 2015 , 44 : 512 – 525 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 64. ↵ Patel A , Ye T , Xue H , Lin Z , Xu S , Woolf B , Mason AM , Burgess S: Mendelianrandomization v0.9.0: Updates to an r package for performing mendelian randomization analyses using summarized data. Wellcome Open Res 2023 , 8 : 449 . OpenUrl 65. ↵ De Jager PL , Ma Y , McCabe C , Xu J , Vardarajan BN , Felsky D , Klein HU , White CC , Peters MA , Lodgson B , et al : A multi-omic atlas of the human frontal cortex for aging and alzheimer’s disease research . Sci Data 2018 , 5 : 180142 . 66. ↵ Li D , Han X , Farrer LA , Stein TD , Jun GR : Transcriptome signatures for cognitive resilience among individuals with pathologically confirmed alzheimer disease. medRxiv 2024 . 67. ↵ Panitch R , Hu J , Chung J , Zhu C , Meng G , Xia W , Bennett DA , Lunetta KL , Ikezu T , Au R , et al : Integrative brain transcriptome analysis links complement component 4 and hspa2 to the apoe epsilon2 protective effect in alzheimer disease . Mol Psychiatry 2021 , 26 : 6054 – 6064 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 68. ↵ Benjamini Y , Hochberg Y : Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 1995 , 57 : 289 – 300 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 69. ↵ Kramer A , Green J , Pollard J , Jr . ., Tugendreich S: Causal analysis approaches in ingenuity pathway analysis . Bioinformatics 2014 , 30 : 523 – 530 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 70. ↵ Ogino H , Hisanaga A , Kohno T , Kondo Y , Okumura K , Kamei T , Sato T , Asahara H , Tsuiji H , Fukata M , Hattori M: Secreted metalloproteinase adamts-3 inactivates reelin . J Neurosci 2017 , 37 : 3181 – 3191 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 71. ↵ Lopera F , Marino C , Chandrahas AS , O’Hare M , Villalba-Moreno ND , Aguillon D , Baena A , Sanchez JS , Vila-Castelar C , Ramirez Gomez L , et al : Resilience to autosomal dominant alzheimer’s disease in a reelin-colbos heterozygous man . Nat Med 2023 , 29 : 1243 – 1252 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 72. ↵ He W , Lu Y , Qahwash I , Hu XY , Chang A , Yan R: Reticulon family members modulate bace1 activity and amyloid-beta peptide generation . Nat Med 2004 , 10 : 959 – 965 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 73. ↵ Xie QQ , Feng X , Huang Y , Fang N , Yi H , Wang ZJ , Cao Q , Lou GF , Pan JP , Hu Y , et al : Nogo-66 promotes beta-amyloid protein secretion via ngr/rock-dependent bace1 activation . Mol Med Rep 2021 , 23 . 74. ↵ Cantalupo A , Zhang Y , Kothiya M , Galvani S , Obinata H , Bucci M , Giordano FJ , Jiang XC , Hla T , Di Lorenzo A: Nogo-b regulates endothelial sphingolipid homeostasis to control vascular function and blood pressure . Nat Med 2015 , 21 : 1028 – 1037 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 75. ↵ Lee A , Kondapalli C , Virga DM , Lewis TL , Jr. , Koo SY , Ashok A , Mairet-Coello G , Herzig S , Foretz M , Viollet B , et al : Abeta42 oligomers trigger synaptic loss through camkk2-ampk-dependent effectors coordinating mitochondrial fission and mitophagy . Nat Commun 2022 , 13 : 4444 . OpenUrl PubMed 76. ↵ Sinkus ML , Graw S , Freedman R , Ross RG , Lester HA , Leonard S : The human chrna7 and chrfam7a genes: A review of the genetics, regulation, and function . Neuropharmacology 2015 , 96 : 274 – 288 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 77. ↵ Ihnatovych I , Birkaya B , Notari E , Szigeti K: Ipsc-derived microglia for modeling human-specific damp and pamp responses in the context of alzheimer’s disease . Int J Mol Sci 2020 , 21 . 78. ↵ Hai Y , Ren K , Zhang Y , Yang L , Cao H , Yuan X , Su L , Li H , Feng X , Liu D: Hif-1alpha serves as a co-linker between ad and t2dm . Biomed Pharmacother 2024 , 171 : 116158 . 79. ↵ Huang Y , Di Lorenzo A , Jiang W , Cantalupo A , Sessa WC , Giordano FJ: Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha in vascular smooth muscle regulates blood pressure homeostasis through a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma-angiotensin ii receptor type 1 axis . Hypertension 2013 , 62 : 634 – 640 . OpenUrl CrossRef 80. ↵ Eissman JM , Dumitrescu L , Mahoney ER , Smith AN , Mukherjee S , Lee ML , Scollard P , Choi SE , Bush WS , Engelman CD , et al : Sex differences in the genetic architecture of cognitive resilience to alzheimer’s disease . Brain 2022 , 145 : 2541 – 2554 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 81. ↵ Dionisio-Santos DA , Olschowka JA , O’Banion MK: Exploiting microglial and peripheral immune cell crosstalk to treat alzheimer’s disease . J Neuroinflammation 2019 , 16 : 74 . 82. ↵ Song H , Suehiro J , Kanki Y , Kawai Y , Inoue K , Daida H , Yano K , Ohhashi T , Oettgen P , Aird WC , et al : Critical role for gata3 in mediating tie2 expression and function in large vessel endothelial cells . J Biol Chem 2009 , 284 : 29109 – 29124 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 83. ↵ Ballester A , Guijarro A , Bravo B , Hernandez J , Murillas R , Gallego MI , Ballester S: Hedgehog signalling modulates immune response and protects against experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis . Int J Mol Sci 2022 , 23 . 84. ↵ Lam M , Trampush JW , Yu J , Knowles E , Davies G , Liewald DC , Starr JM , Djurovic S , Melle I , Sundet K , et al : Large-scale cognitive gwas meta-analysis reveals tissue-specific neural expression and potential nootropic drug targets . Cell Rep 2017 , 21 : 2597 – 2613 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 85. ↵ Berth SH , Lloyd TE: Disruption of axonal transport in neurodegeneration . J Clin Invest 2023 , 133 . 86. ↵ Garbino A , van Oort RJ , Dixit SS , Landstrom AP , Ackerman MJ , Wehrens XH: Molecular evolution of the junctophilin gene family . Physiol Genomics 2009 , 37 : 175 – 186 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 87. ↵ Sama DM , Norris CM : Calcium dysregulation and neuroinflammation: Discrete and integrated mechanisms for age-related synaptic dysfunction . Ageing Res Rev 2013 , 12 : 982 – 995 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 88. ↵ Farber K , Kettenmann H: Functional role of calcium signals for microglial function . Glia 2006 , 54 : 656 – 665 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 89. ↵ Verkhratsky A , Rodriguez JJ , Parpura V: Calcium signalling in astroglia . Mol Cell Endocrinol 2012 , 353 : 45 – 56 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 90. ↵ Landstrom AP , Weisleder N , Batalden KB , Bos JM , Tester DJ , Ommen SR , Wehrens XH , Claycomb WC , Ko JK , Hwang M , et al : Mutations in jph2-encoded junctophilin-2 associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in humans . J Mol Cell Cardiol 2007 , 42 : 1026 – 1035 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 91. ↵ Lee H , Kim HK , Kim B , Han K , Park JB , Hwang IC , Yoon YE , Park HE , Choi SY , Kim YJ , Cho GY : Augmented risk of dementia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A propensity score matching analysis using the nationwide cohort . PLoS One 2022 , 17 : e0269911 . OpenUrl PubMed 92. ↵ Naj AC , Leonenko G , Jian X , Grenier-Boley B , Dalmasso MC , Bellenguez C , Sha J , Zhao Y , van der Lee SJ , Sims R , et al : Genome-wide meta-analysis of late-onset alzheimer’s disease using rare variant imputation in 65,602 subjects identifies novel rare variant locus nck2: The international genomics of alzheimer’s project (igap) . medRxiv 2021 . 93. ↵ Zhao J , Deng Y , Jiang Z , Qing H : G protein-coupled receptors (gpcrs) in alzheimer’s disease: A focus on bace1 related gpcrs . Front Aging Neurosci 2016 , 8 : 58 . 94. ↵ Carello-Collar G , Bellaver B , Ferreira PCL , Ferrari-Souza JP , Ramos VG , Therriault J , Tissot C , De Bastiani MA , Soares C , Pascoal TA , et al : The gabaergic system in alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review with meta-analysis . Mol Psychiatry 2023 , 28 : 5025 – 5036 . OpenUrl PubMed 95. ↵ Dagda RK , Das Banerjee T : Role of protein kinase a in regulating mitochondrial function and neuronal development: Implications to neurodegenerative diseases . Rev Neurosci 2015 , 26 : 359 – 370 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 96. ↵ Brinks HL , Eckhart AD: Regulation of gpcr signaling in hypertension . Biochim Biophys Acta 2010 , 1802 : 1268 – 1275 . OpenUrl PubMed Web of Science 97. ↵ Ungvari Z , Csiszar A , Kaminski PM , Wolin MS , Koller A : Chronic high pressure-induced arterial oxidative stress: Involvement of protein kinase c-dependent nad(p)h oxidase and local renin-angiotensin system . Am J Pathol 2004 , 165 : 219 – 226 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 98. ↵ Benicky J , Sanchez-Lemus E , Pavel J , Saavedra JM: Anti-inflammatory effects of angiotensin receptor blockers in the brain and the periphery . Cell Mol Neurobiol 2009 , 29 : 781 – 792 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 99. ↵ Chang PK , Khatchadourian A , McKinney RA , Maysinger D : Docosahexaenoic acid (dha): A modulator of microglia activity and dendritic spine morphology . J Neuroinflammation 2015 , 12 : 34 . 100. ↵ Lohitaksha K , Kumari D , Shukla M , Byagari L , Ashireddygari VR , Tammineni P , Reddanna P , Gorla M: Eicosanoid signaling in neuroinflammation associated with alzheimer’s disease . Eur J Pharmacol 2024 , 976 : 176694 . 101. ↵ Zhang Z , Zhao L , Zhou X , Meng X , Zhou X : Role of inflammation, immunity, and oxidative stress in hypertension: New insights and potential therapeutic targets . Front Immunol 2022 , 13 : 1098725 . 102. ↵ Safar ME , Levy BI , Struijker-Boudier H: Current perspectives on arterial stiffness and pulse pressure in hypertension and cardiovascular diseases . Circulation 2003 , 107 : 2864 – 2869 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text 103. ↵ McEniery CM , Wallace S , Mackenzie IS , McDonnell B , Yasmin , Newby DE , Cockcroft JR , Wilkinson IB: Endothelial function is associated with pulse pressure, pulse wave velocity, and augmentation index in healthy humans . Hypertension 2006 , 48 : 602 – 608 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 104. ↵ Sandoo A , van Zanten JJ , Metsios GS , Carroll D , Kitas GD: The endothelium and its role in regulating vascular tone . Open Cardiovasc Med J 2010 , 4 : 302 – 312 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 105. ↵ Davies PF : Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Physiol Rev 1995 , 75 : 519-560 . OpenUrl PubMed 106. ↵ Paniagua OA , Bryant MB , Panza JA : Role of endothelial nitric oxide in shear stress-induced vasodilation of human microvasculature: Diminished activity in hypertensive and hypercholesterolemic patients . Circulation 2001 , 103 : 1752 – 1758 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 107. ↵ Heneka MT , Carson MJ , El Khoury J , Landreth GE , Brosseron F , Feinstein DL , Jacobs AH , Wyss-Coray T , Vitorica J , Ransohoff RM , et al : Neuroinflammation in alzheimer’s disease . Lancet Neurol 2015 , 14 : 388 – 405 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 108. ↵ Heppner FL , Ransohoff RM , Becher B : Immune attack: The role of inflammation in alzheimer disease . Nat Rev Neurosci 2015 , 16 : 358 – 372 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 109. ↵ Kyrkanides S , Tallents RH , Miller JN , Olschowka ME , Johnson R , Yang M , Olschowka JA , Brouxhon SM , O’Banion MK: Osteoarthritis accelerates and exacerbates alzheimer’s disease pathology in mice . J Neuroinflammation 2011 , 8 : 112 . View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted February 13, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Genome-wide pleiotropy analysis of longitudinal blood pressure and harmonized cognitive performance measures Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Genome-wide pleiotropy analysis of longitudinal blood pressure and harmonized cognitive performance measures Moonil Kang , Ting Fang Alvin Ang , Sherral A. Devine , Richard Sherva , Shubhabrata Mukherjee , Emily H. Trittschuh , Laura E. Gibbons , Phoebe Scollard , Michael Lee , Seo-Eun Choi , Brandon Klinedinst , Connie Nakano , Logan C. Dumitrescu , Timothy J. Hohman , Michael L. Cuccaro , Andrew J. Saykin , Walter A. Kukull , David A. Bennett , Li-San Wang , Richard P. Mayeux , Jonathan L. Haines , Margaret A. Pericak-Vance , Gerard D. Schellenberg , Paul K. Crane , Rhoda Au , Kathryn L. Lunetta , Jesse Mez , Lindsay A. Farrer medRxiv 2025.02.11.25322014; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.11.25322014 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Genome-wide pleiotropy analysis of longitudinal blood pressure and harmonized cognitive performance measures Moonil Kang , Ting Fang Alvin Ang , Sherral A. Devine , Richard Sherva , Shubhabrata Mukherjee , Emily H. Trittschuh , Laura E. Gibbons , Phoebe Scollard , Michael Lee , Seo-Eun Choi , Brandon Klinedinst , Connie Nakano , Logan C. Dumitrescu , Timothy J. Hohman , Michael L. Cuccaro , Andrew J. Saykin , Walter A. Kukull , David A. Bennett , Li-San Wang , Richard P. Mayeux , Jonathan L. Haines , Margaret A. Pericak-Vance , Gerard D. Schellenberg , Paul K. Crane , Rhoda Au , Kathryn L. Lunetta , Jesse Mez , Lindsay A. Farrer medRxiv 2025.02.11.25322014; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.11.25322014 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Genetic and Genomic Medicine Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (568) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (297) Cardiovascular Medicine (4421) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (443) Dermatology (382) Emergency Medicine (606) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1507) Epidemiology (15212) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1121) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6581) Geriatric Medicine (667) Health Economics (996) Health Informatics (4520) Health Policy (1366) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1611) Hematology (539) HIV/AIDS (1264) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15906) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (620) Medical Ethics (144) Nephrology (667) Neurology (6580) Nursing (345) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1141) Occupational and Environmental Health (956) Oncology (3324) Ophthalmology (970) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (435) Palliative Medicine (129) Pathology (663) Pediatrics (1689) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (691) Primary Care Research (710) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5433) Public and Global Health (9212) Radiology and Imaging (2193) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1368) Respiratory Medicine (1194) Rheumatology (593) Sexual and Reproductive Health (709) Sports Medicine (529) Surgery (709) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (288) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9ff4f365e81ee2c5',t:'MTc3OTM4MDg3MA=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.