A lack of sociodemographic participant diversity in endometriosis evidence risks unrepresentative clinical guidance: a structured review of the evidence contributing to a NICE guideline
This review found that evidence cited in a national endometriosis guideline lacked sociodemographic diversity, particularly regarding ethnicity and age, with predominantly white participants from tertiary care.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This structured review mapped how sociodemographic diversity was recorded in the evidence contributing to the NICE NG73 (2017) endometriosis guideline, focusing on setting, ethnicity, age, and socioeconomic status across the chapters “Signs and Symptoms,” “Information and Support,” and “Diagnosis.” Across 44 studies (43 sample groups), data extraction was performed independently by two researchers, and the authors found no studies conducted in primary care; “Signs and Symptoms” and “Diagnosis” evidence came exclusively from tertiary care. Ethnicity was formally reported in only 4/44 studies, with participant samples largely white/Caucasian (93%, 90%, 60%, and 75%; mean 79.5%), adolescents were included in only 3/44 studies with many studies excluding those outside reproductive age, and socioeconomic status was reported in 8 studies—mostly describing predominantly tertiary-educated participants. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,345 characters
· extracted from
oa-pdf
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Background
Method
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-27T06:11:05.884134+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-08-27T06:08:21.184769+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine