Formative feedback to improve pharmacology learning: Proposed principles and guidelines for effective practice

preprint OA: closed
⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text ⓘ

This paper reviews English-language research from 2000–2024 across higher education, medical/health sciences education, pharmacy education, and pharmacology education, with the aim of defining formative assessment and formative feedback and synthesizing evidence-based principles and practical guidelines for pharmacology teachers. The key finding is that, despite a substantial empirical literature on formative feedback in higher education, relatively little work exists in medical and health sciences education, and no relevant pharmacology-specific formative feedback research was located, making a formal literature review within pharmacology unviable. The author concludes that students need formative feedback to learn and that pharmacology teachers need guidance to provide it effectively and efficiently, while also noting potential utility for training generative AI systems to support formative feedback provision. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Aims: . To learn effectively, students need timely, specific, actionable feedback---known as formative feedback---on what and how well they are learning and on how to improve further. Providing feedback to help students learn pharmacology effectively is a complex task. Currently, however, pharmacology educators lack evidence-based guidelines for effective, efficient practice. This article aims to fill that gap. First, it briefly defines formative assessment and feedback and explains how they can affect student learning. Second, it offers pharmacology teachers research-based principles and related practical guidelines for using formative feedback to improve student learning. These principles and guidelines may also be useful in training generative artificial intelligence programs to support formative feedback provision. Third, it aims to stimulate interest in, use of, experimentation with, and research on formative feedback in pharmacology education. Methods. Relevant research literature was reviewed from higher education, medical and health sciences education, pharmacy education, and pharmacology education on effective practice of formative assessment and formative feedback published in English between 2000 and 2024. Findings. While there is a substantial body of empirical research on formative feedback in higher education, relatively little has been published in medical and health sciences education. In pharmacology education, no relevant research on formative feedback was located, making a formal literature review unviable. Conclusion. Students need formative feedback to learn. Teachers need guidance to provide that feedback effectively and efficiently. Pharmacology teachers and learners can benefit from practical principles and guidelines for formative feedback practice based in the most current, relevant research.
Full text 6,912 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Formative feedback to improve pharmacology learning: Proposed principles and guidelines for effective practice | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 14 October 2025 V1 Latest version Share on Formative feedback to improve pharmacology learning: Proposed principles and guidelines for effective practice Author : Thomas Angelo 0000-0003-2155-3897 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176045955.54249074/v1 147 views 121 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Aims. To learn effectively, students need timely, specific, actionable feedback---known as formative feedback---on what and how well they are learning and on how to improve further. Providing feedback to help students learn pharmacology effectively is a complex task. Currently, however, pharmacology educators lack evidence-based guidelines for effective, efficient practice. This article aims to fill that gap. First, it briefly defines formative assessment and feedback and explains how they can affect student learning. Second, it offers pharmacology teachers research-based principles and related practical guidelines for using formative feedback to improve student learning. These principles and guidelines may also be useful in training generative artificial intelligence programs to support formative feedback provision. Third, it aims to stimulate interest in, use of, experimentation with, and research on formative feedback in pharmacology education. Methods. Relevant research literature was reviewed from higher education, medical and health sciences education, pharmacy education, and pharmacology education on effective practice of formative assessment and formative feedback published in English between 2000 and 2024. Findings. While there is a substantial body of empirical research on formative feedback in higher education, relatively little has been published in medical and health sciences education. In pharmacology education, no relevant research on formative feedback was located, making a formal literature review unviable. Conclusion. Students need formative feedback to learn. Teachers need guidance to provide that feedback effectively and efficiently. Pharmacology teachers and learners can benefit from practical principles and guidelines for formative feedback practice based in the most current, relevant research. Supplementary Material File (formative.feedback.revised.mss.bjcp.final_t.a. angelo_13.oct.2025.docx) Download 71.15 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 14 October 2025 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Collection British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Authors Affiliations Thomas Angelo 0000-0003-2155-3897 [email protected] Monash University View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 147 views 121 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Thomas Angelo. Formative feedback to improve pharmacology learning: Proposed principles and guidelines for effective practice. Authorea . 14 October 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176045955.54249074/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.176045955.54249074/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a008195e1bbe593a',t:'MTc3OTU4MTY1NA=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-09T06:39:34.564547+00:00