Long-read sequencing for biodiversity analyses - a comprehensive guide

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0

Abstract

DNA-based monitoring of biodiversity has revolutionised our ability to describe communities and rapidly assess anthropogenic impacts on biodiversity. Currently established molecular methods for biomonitoring rely heavily on classic metabarcoding utilising short reads, mostly through Illumina data. However, increasingly more studies use long-read sequencing technologies, such as Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and Pacific Biosciences (PacBio), for analyses of environmental DNA (eDNA) and DNA barcoding. These long-read sequencing approaches can be advantageous over existing methods by providing increased information content and opening new avenues for understanding biodiversity at a larger scale. In this review we provide a comprehensive overview of all studies to date using long-read sequencing platforms for biodiversity analyses of eukaryotes from eDNA and community metabarcoding, and DNA barcoding. We also give detailed information on each step required for sample processing, data generation and analysis of long-read sequencing datasets for biodiversity applications. Even though the number of studies using long-read sequencing technologies is rapidly increasing, clear established guidelines for sample preparation or analysis of such datasets are lacking. Furthermore, there is no existing overview of eukaryote monitoring applications for both ONT and PacBio technologies across different sample types. Long-read sequencing platforms provide possibilities for metabarcoding (PCR-based) of both short and long fragments, shotgun sequencing (PCR-free), or DNA barcoding. ONT platforms in particular can also allow real time data acquisition while the portability of the MinION instrument can support sequencing in the field. PacBio on the other hand can provide highly accurate reads and can be used to reliably address open questions in ecology and evolution for difficult to characterise taxa such as microbial eukaryotes. Streamlining the use of these technologies could enable sequencing of whole organelles or population level assessments from environmental data, which would be a step-change for DNA based monitoring. Here we review current applications, applied methodology, and future perspectives in the field. Overall we aim to facilitate the use of long-read sequencing technologies by the wider community, promote best practices for data generation and standardised data reporting that supports reproducibility, and to encourage open data policies and tools.
Full text 3,073 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

1. DNA-based monitoring of biodiversity has revolutionised our ability to describe communities and rapidly assess anthropogenic impacts on biodiversity. Currently established molecular methods for biomonitoring rely heavily on classic metabarcoding utilising short reads, mostly through Illumina data. However, increasingly more studies use long-read sequencing technologies, such as Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and Pacific Biosciences (PacBio), for analyses of environmental DNA (eDNA) and DNA barcoding. These long-read sequencing approaches can be advantageous over existing methods by providing increased information content and opening new avenues for understanding biodiversity at a larger scale. 2. In this review we provide an overview of studies to date using long-read sequencing platforms for biodiversity analyses of eukaryotes, from eDNA and community metabarcoding, shotgun sequencing, and DNA barcoding. We also give detailed information on each step required for sample processing, data generation and analysis of long-read sequencing datasets for biodiversity applications. Even though the number of studies using long-read sequencing technologies is rapidly increasing, clear established guidelines for sample preparation or analysis of such datasets are lacking. Furthermore, a side by side review for both ONT and PacBio technologies across different applications has not been presented. 3. Long-read sequencing platforms provide possibilities for metabarcoding (PCR-based) of both short and long fragments, shotgun sequencing (PCR-free), or DNA barcoding. ONT platforms in particular can also allow real time data acquisition while the portability of the MinION instrument can support sequencing in the field. PacBio on the other hand can provide highly accurate reads and can be used to reliably address open questions in ecology and evolution for difficult to characterise taxa such as microeukaryotes. Streamlining the use of these technologies could enable sequencing of whole organelles or population level assessments from environmental samples, which would be a step-change for DNA-based monitoring. 4. Here we review existing applications, applied methodology, and future perspectives in the field. Overall we aim to facilitate the use of long-read sequencing technologies by the wider community, promote best practices for data generation and standardised data reporting that supports reproducibility, and to encourage open data policies and tools. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2JP8H Subjects Biodiversity, Bioinformatics, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Environmental Monitoring, Genetics and Genomics, Life Sciences

Keywords

Biodiversity Monitoring, eDNA, DNA barcoding, long-read sequencing, metabarcoding, ONT, PacBio, shotgun Dates Published: 2025-08-26 19:20 Last Updated: 2026-02-04 00:44 Older Versions License CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Additional Metadata Data and Code Availability Statement: Not applicable Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0