The impact of barcode-assisted medication administration on medication administration errors in non-unit-dose settings: a systematic review

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Objective This study aims to investigate how barcode-assisted medication administration systems (BCMAs) can affect medication administration errors (MAEs) in non-unit-dose dispensing settings, since unit dose dispensing system can be a confounding variable affecting MAE rates. Materials and Methods We conducted a systematic review of articles on MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE, CINAHL and Scopus. Studies are meticulously examined to exclude those with unit-dose dispensing setting. Results We included 4 papers in the review. The categories of MAEs reported among these studies are heterogeneous. 2 studies give weak evidence and 1 study give moderate evidence that BCMA can lower some categories of MAEs. 1 studies gives weak evidence that BCMA increase the wrong administration time error. Discussion Studies provide weak to moderate evidence that barcode-assisted medication administration can lower certain categories of medication administration errors. However, some reported findings are minimal. Conclusion More multi-ward multi-hospital studies need to be conducted to provide stronger evidence on BCMA’s impact on MAEs, especially on dosage-related MAEs, in settings without unit dose dispensing systems.
Full text 2,549 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective This study aims to investigate how barcode-assisted medication administration systems (BCMAs) can affect medication administration errors (MAEs) in non-unit-dose dispensing settings, since unit dose dispensing system can be a confounding variable affecting MAE rates.

Materials and methods

We conducted a systematic review of articles on MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE, CINAHL and Scopus. Studies are meticulously examined to exclude those with unit-dose dispensing setting.

Results

We included 4 papers in the review. The categories of MAEs reported among these studies are heterogeneous. 2 studies give weak evidence and 1 study give moderate evidence that BCMA can lower some categories of MAEs. 1 studies gives weak evidence that BCMA increase the wrong administration time error.

Discussion

Studies provide weak to moderate evidence that barcode-assisted medication administration can lower certain categories of medication administration errors. However, some reported findings are minimal.

Conclusion

More multi-ward multi-hospital studies need to be conducted to provide stronger evidence on BCMA’s impact on MAEs, especially on dosage-related MAEs, in settings without unit dose dispensing systems. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement This study did not receive any funding. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability Not applicable.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0