Systemic hypoxia suppresses solid tumor growth

preprint OA: closed
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

Systemic hypoxia, achieved pharmacologically, suppressed solid tumor growth across multiple cancer types by inhibiting de novo purine synthesis and potentiating chemotherapy or immunotherapy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 · read from full text

The paper investigates how systemic hypoxia, compared with localized tumor hypoxia, affects tumor growth in vivo across multiple cancer types and preclinical models, using metabolite profiling and stable isotope tracing. It finds that systemic hypoxia decreases solid tumor growth and that this effect is not attributable to hypoglycemia, hypoinsulinemia, or activation of HIF signaling. Instead, tumor metabolite analyses show extensive perturbations in purine-related pathways, and tracing indicates tumors suppress de novo purine synthesis under systemic hypoxia. The authors also report no development of resistance and that combining systemic hypoxia with chemotherapy or immunotherapy further reduces tumor growth, with hypoxia achievable pharmacologically using HypoxyStat, while noting the broader paradigm-challenge to hypoxia’s role as a negative prognostic factor. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ABSTRACT Local hypoxia is a hallmark of solid tumors and a negative prognostic factor in the progression and treatment of cancer. Here, we showed that systemic hypoxia, in contrast to localized tumor hypoxia, decreases tumor growth in vivo across multiple cancer types and preclinical models. The reduced tumor growth in systemic hypoxia was not explained by hypoglycemia, hypoinsulinemia, or HIF activation. Instead, metabolite profiling in tumors and tumor interstitial fluid revealed extensive perturbations in purine-related metabolites. Stable isotope tracing demonstrated that systemic hypoxia caused tumors to suppress de novo purine synthesis. Furthermore, tumors did not develop resistance to systemic hypoxia therapy, and when used in combination with chemotherapy or immunotherapy, systemic hypoxia dramatically suppressed tumor growth. Finally, we showed that systemic hypoxia can be achieved pharmacologically with the small molecule HypoxyStat. These findings challenge the long-held paradigm of hypoxia as a negative prognostic factor in cancer progression, and they suggest a potential therapeutic role for systemic hypoxia in suppressing solid tumor growth.
Full text 1,352 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
ABSTRACT Local hypoxia is a hallmark of solid tumors and a negative prognostic factor in the progression and treatment of cancer. Here, we showed that systemic hypoxia, in contrast to localized tumor hypoxia, decreases tumor growth in vivo across multiple cancer types and preclinical models. The reduced tumor growth in systemic hypoxia was not explained by hypoglycemia, hypoinsulinemia, or HIF activation. Instead, metabolite profiling in tumors and tumor interstitial fluid revealed extensive perturbations in purine-related metabolites. Stable isotope tracing demonstrated that systemic hypoxia caused tumors to suppress de novo purine synthesis. Furthermore, tumors did not develop resistance to systemic hypoxia therapy, and when used in combination with chemotherapy or immunotherapy, systemic hypoxia dramatically suppressed tumor growth. Finally, we showed that systemic hypoxia can be achieved pharmacologically with the small molecule HypoxyStat. These findings challenge the long-held paradigm of hypoxia as a negative prognostic factor in cancer progression, and they suggest a potential therapeutic role for systemic hypoxia in suppressing solid tumor growth. Full Text Availability The license terms selected by the author(s) for this preprint version do not permit archiving in PMC. The full text is available from the preprint server.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-03T06:41:53.707437+00:00