Input data when using neural networks to estimate lower-body torques from wearable sensors during gait: Is it of great influence?

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent advancements in wearable sensors and machine learning show promise for estimating lower-body joint torques outside of laboratory settings. Inertial Measurement Units combined with Convolutional Neural Networks have proven effective for this task. However, the impact of different input data types and formats remains underexplored. This study investigates how variations in input data influence the prediction of lower-body joint torques during walking. Results indicate that while dataset choice causes only minor differences in prediction performance, the overall quality of the dataset plays a more critical role than the specific input variables in achieving accurate torque predictions using wearable sensors.
Full text 1,220 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Recent advancements in wearable sensors and machine learning show promise for estimating lower-body joint torques outside of laboratory settings. Inertial Measurement Units combined with Convolutional Neural Networks have proven effective for this task. However, the impact of different input data types and formats remains underexplored. This study investigates how variations in input data influence the prediction of lower-body joint torques during walking. Results indicate that while dataset choice causes only minor differences in prediction performance, the overall quality of the dataset plays a more critical role than the specific input variables in achieving accurate torque predictions using wearable sensors. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes simon.ozan{at}univ-rennes2.fr Disclosure statement. The authors report there are no competing interests to declare. Fundings and acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank the participants of this study for their contribution, and Ms Hogan for proofreading the article. This study was supported in part by the New Aquitaine region and the European Union through the Habisan program (CPER□FEDER).

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-10T06:43:36.850308+00:00