Green synthesis of bioactive hydroxyapatite/cellulose composites from food industrial wastes

Green synthesis of bioactive hydroxyapatite/cellulose composites from food industrial wastes | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Green synthesis of bioactive hydroxyapatite/cellulose composites from food industrial wastes Mohamed Abdelraof, Mohammad M. Farag, Zainab Mohammed Al-Rashidy, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1670361/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 3 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This work aimed at the preparation of cost-effective bioactive composites based on bacterial cellulose (BC) and eggshell or hydroxyapatite (HAp) by a green method using bacteria. HAp was prepared from eggshell wastes, and another one was synthesized from chemical precursors for comparison. The BC productivity was evaluated, and the resultant composites were characterized by XRD, FTIR, and SEM/EDX. Furthermore, the biodegradation and bioactivity were assessed in SBF, and the cell viability was studied against oral normal cells. The results showed that the productivity of BC was not affected by HAp at lower concentrations; however, the yield was decreased at higher concentrations. Moreover, the eggshell was converted to Ca 3 (PO 4 ) 2 in BC/eggshell composite, while HAp in the composites contained either eggshell-derived HAp or chemically-derived HAp was a combination of Ca 3 (PO 4 ) 2 and HAp phases. The in vitro bioactivity test in SBF showed that all composites were induced the formation of a bone-like apatite layer on their surface. Finally, the in vitro cell viability test was confirmed good biocompatibility against the composites which expectedly are as pure as to be used safely in different biomedical applications. Bacterial cellulose Hydroxyapatite Fermentation Food industrials waste Biomaterials Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Introduction Biopolymers are a large group of polymers that are produced from living organisms. Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a unique material made in surface culture by such rod-shaped Gram-negative bacteria as Gluconacetobacter xylinum . However, the extraction of cellulose from other components found naturally in the plants has many drawbacks because hazardous chemicals are used in this process. Some bacterial strains can produce bacterial cellulose (BC) with a high purity degree. In this process, bacteria are used as the nutrients to produce cellulose. Hence, the cost of the nutrients plays an important role in the production process economics. Additionally, is one of the most abundant macromolecule on Earth [ 1 , 2 ]. Although its production is mostly by vascular plants, an alternative route that used to produce from another resource such as bacterial systems [ 2 – 5 ]. Some kinds of bacteria can produce cellulose with the same as cellulose produced by higher plants and algae, but overall, it exhibits extra chemical pure. Due to its unique physical, chemical, and mechanical properties that involve high crystallinity, high water holding capacity, large surface area, elasticity, mechanical strength, and biocompatibility, thus BC has potential applications in edible packing as a food contact packaging material. In medicine, as wound dressing materials, artificial skin, vascular grafts, scaffolds for tissue engineering, artificial blood vessels, medical pads, dental implants [ 6 ]. In other industries products, such as sponges to collect leaking oil in drug delivery agents, capsule shells, oil spill cleanup sponge; mineral and oil recovery; leather products, sports items; ultra-filters for water purification; audio speaker diaphragm; plywood laminates; specialty papers and polyesters; automotive and aircraft bodies and materials for absorbing toxins and optoelectronics materials (liquid crystal displays) [ 7 ]. Several genera that have shown the ability to synthesize cellulose include Sarcina, Agrobacterium, Rhizobium , and Acetobacter also known as Gluconacetobacter . The most efficient producer of BC, a Gram negative and acetic acid bacterium Gluconacetobacterxylinus is the model microorganism for basic and applied studies on cellulose. G. xylinus produces an extra-cellular gel-like material or pellicle, which comprises a random assembly of cellulose ribbons, composed of several micro-fibrils. This organism and its product were first identified and characterized over a century ago [ 8 ]. A three-dimensional interconnected reticular pellicle is produced under static fermentation, whereas agitated and stirred conditions to produce irregularly shaped, sphere-like cellulose particles [ 9 , 10 ]. However, the high cost of fermentation media has limited the industrial production of BC, as such media account for 30% of the total production cost [ 11 ]. Thus, finding new cost-effective culture media to achieve the highest yield of BC in large-scale industrial applications is paramount and requires new carbon and nitrogen sources. The Hestrin– Schramm (HS) medium is commonly used in the cultivation of BC. However, this medium is expensive and requires additional products, such as glucose, yeast, peptone, etc. Thus, wider applications of BC depend on practical considerations concerning scale-up capability and production costs [ 12 – 14 ]. In recent years, studies have focused on a variety of cellulose-producing bacterial strains, inexpensive nutrient sources, and supplementary materials for the production of inexpensive BC [ 15 ]. Different waste products from agricultural and industrial activities have been investigated as a means to improve the yield and decrease the cost of BC production, such as dry olive mill residue [ 16 ], sugarcane molasses[ 7 , 17 ], waste beer yeast [ 18 ], wastewater from candy processing [ 19 ], wood sugars [ 15 ], waste from fruit processing [ 20 ], lipid fermentation wastewater [ 14 ], rice bark, konjac powder [ 21 ], cotton-based textile waste [ 22 ], and coffee bean husks [ 23 ]. The use of such materials could improve the sustainability of BC production as well as reduce environmental pollution associated with the disposal of industrial wastes. The potential of BC goes beyond existing applications, especially if produced in large amounts from the inexpensive feedstock. Such applications may include specialty textiles, packaging, and advanced functional materials [ 13 ]. In this way, the high-value utilization of agricultural waste is regarded as beneficial in terms of economics, environment, and practicality [ 24 ]. Each year huge amounts of the eggs are consumed into foods such as cakes, mayonnaise, and fast foods [ 25 ]. about 150,000 tons of eggshell waste is generated from the US only every year [ 26 ]. The eggshell waste can be reused as fertilizer, animal feed constituents, and others [ 27 ]. If high amounts of this kind of waste are kept in landfills they will attract rats and vermin due to the organic membrane attached to the shells [ 28 ], therefore, most landfill owners do not like to dispose of eggshell wastes. Consequently, the complete recycling of eggshell waste is considered the best choice to solve this environmental and economic problem. The eggshells are considered a cheap, abundant, and natural source of CaCO 3 compound which can be utilized in the synthesis of hydroxyapatite (HAp) which is one kind of bioceramic material. It has been reported that HAp is mostly preferred bioceramics, especially for fabrication of bone engineering scaffolds, due to their similarity of composition with the inorganic part of human bone [ 29 , 30 ]. Synthetic HAp materials have been prepared by different methods, such as sol-gel, wet precipitation, solid-state reaction, and hydrothermal method, and they are usually prepared from chemicals. The natural precursors for the preparation of HAp are considered a versatile approach to obtaining pure final products free from toxic impurities and they give more advantageous properties, such as the pore structure carbonated constituent. Coral [ 31 ], bovine bone [ 32 ], and fishbone [ 33 ] are examples of natural raw materials for HAp synthesis. However, the mean problems of those materials are changeability in their physical and chemical properties [ 32 ]. Eggshell is considered the most natural raw material of the invariable chemical composition. Therefore, there have been numerous previous works that prepared HAp from eggshells as a natural source [ 34 – 42 ]. Biocompatibility is an important quality of biomaterials and cytotoxicity tests are primary biocompatibility tests which measure the capacity of a material to impact on cellular viability. While a cell is in contact with a biomaterial, many reactions can occur, and a sensing Phenomenon will launch between this cell and the biomaterial [ 18 ] Cells adhere to surfaces through adhesion proteins (i.e. fibronectin, collagen, laminin, vitro- nectin) using specific cell receptors, called integrins, attached to the cell membrane. Cell adhesion is the ability of a single cell to stick to another cell or an extracellular matrix (ECM). [ 22 ]. Cell adhesion is involved in stimulating signals that regulate cell differentiation, cell cycle, cell migration, and cell survival [ 23 ]. The main objective of this work is in situ preparation of new bioactive composites based on BC synthesized by G. xylinum by using agricultural residues as an alternative culture media without any supplementation and hydroxyapatite (HAp) derived from eggshell or HAp derived from chemicals, as well as, eggshell wastes were used added directly to the culture media for comparison. Accordingly, these bioactive composites were prepared almost from natural raw materials (eggshells and bacterial cellulose) which expectedly are as pure as to be used safely in different biomedical applications. Materials And Methods Materials Eggshell and membranes resulting from Egg processing were collected from the disposal of free markets. The collected eggshell waste without disease symptoms was selected and washed thoroughly with distilled water to remove additional residues from its surface and then heated at 105°C for 72 h to dry, sieved, and used as a template in the BC culture medium. Methods Synthesis of hydroxyapatite (HAp) Hydroxyapatite powder was prepared from eggshell waste. Briefly, collected hen eggshells were cleaned in hot distilled water and left to dry in the air. And then, they heat treated up to 900°C to give CaO. The calcined eggshell was dispersed in the water with a concentration of 0.5 M for 3 hours, and 0.3 M of phosphoric acid was added dropwise on the calcium solution under stirring. After complete reaction, the solution was left foraging for 1 day and then washed and filtered. The precipitate was dried and sintered at different temperatures ranging from 600°C to 900°C. For comparison, HAp was prepared from CaCO 3 chemical following the same previous steps. The prepared powders were suspended in the bacterial cellulose growth media to prepare in situ composite materials. Moreover, the collected eggshell waste was also used in the in situ preparation of composite material. The composites based on bacterial cellulose (BC)/eggshell, BC/HAp synthesized from CaCO 3 chemical, and BC/HAp synthesized from eggshell herein encoded as BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg, respectively. Preparation Of Pure Bacterial Cellulose Preparation of bacterial cellulose was achieved by the standard strain Gluconacetobacter xylinum ATCC 10245 that was purchased from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA). Preliminary activation of G. xylinum was carried out by cultivating it in Mannitol broth medium as described by Abdelraof, et al. [ 43 ] for 24 h. at 30 o C under shaking conditions. Subsequently, the activated strain was transferred to the standard HS culture medium for preparation of pure cellulose under standard culture optimization according to our previous report [ 44 ]. At the end of the incubation period, the cellulose pellicles were separated from the culture medium under centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 10 min. Then, the cellulose pellicles were subjected to purification protocol as mentioned by Abdelraof, et al [ 44 ]. In Situ Preparation Of Bc/eg, Bc/ha-ch, And Bc/ha-eg In this regard, various concentrations of each of Eg, HA-ch, and HA-Eg (0.025–0.75 g/ 100 ml) were incorporated into the standard culture medium of G. xylinum for examined their ability to use it as a template to produce cellulose, and thus evaluation the formed composite. Investigation of different parameters such as pH value, and glucose consumption and the relationship between them during cultivation time of each concentration of these materials was carried out. Regarding the pH value, HS culture medium was adjusted at 6.0 and the variation in the pH value after the addition of Eg, HA-ch, or HA-Eg was recorded before inoculation. The sugar consumption was expressed by calculating the total reducing sugar concentration via DNS reagent [ 45 ] using D-glucose as standard. After the fermentation process, BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composites were collected from the top of the culture medium and then purified like that of prepared pure BC [ 44 ]. Consequently, pure composites were dried at 70°C for 24 h to evaluate the yield concentration in g/L. The influence of these materials on the cellulose yield can also be determined after purification of the composite [ 43 ] by estimating the cellulose amount in the composite after subtracting the Eg, HA-ch, or HA-Eg concentration from the total weight of the composite. The increase or decrease of cellulose yield (%) after treatment can be calculated as follows: %= \(A-B/A x 100\) Where A displayed the Cellulose production without any treatment, while B is the Cellulose producing after treatment Composite Characterization The XRD analysis of the composite samples was conducted by Philips PW1390 X-ray diffractometer (U.S.D.) in the 2θ range from 20 to 70° in 0.02° steps at λ = 1.5418 Å using CuKα radiation. Moreover, FTIR was performed for the samples using infrared absorption spectra at room temperature in the wavenumber range of 4000–400 cm -1 using Fourier transform infrared (BRUKER). The prepared samples each of 2 mg were mixed with 200 mg KBr in an agate mortar and pressed into a pellet. For each sample, the FTIR spectrum was normalized with a blank KBr pellet. Furthermore, the sample surfaces were coated with a thin layer of gold for SEM and EDX analyses to study the morphology microstructure of the prepared composites. In Vitro Biodegradation And Bioactivity Test The bone-forming activity in vitro was tested in simulated body fluid (SBF) to monitor the formation of hydroxyl-carbonated apatite (HCA) on the surface of composites samples over time. The samples were placed into a vessel containing SBF and incubated at 37°C under pH 7.4 for periods 1, 3, 7, and d. At the predetermined periods, the ions’ concentrations released from the samples into the incubating medium was measured by colorimetric kits (SPECTRUM, Egypt), and they were characterized by scanning electron microscope coupled with energy dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM/EDX), to investigate the hydroxyapatite layer formed on coatings surfaces. Evaluation Of The Cytotoxicity By Mtt Assay MTT assay was applied to reveal the viability of (OEC) normal oral epithelial cells under the effect of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg. Briefly, OEC cells were plated in 96-well culture plates and exposed to various concentrations (15.63, 31.25, 62.5, 125 and 250 µg/ml). In addition to controlling untreated cells. All cultures were incubated for 24 hours at 37˚C using a 5% CO2 incubator. At the end of the incubation period, the MTT solution (5mg/ml) was added to each well and incubated at 37 ˚C for 4 h. The absorbance was measured in triplicates at 570 nm using the ELISA Reader system (SunRise TECAN, Inc., USA). The morphological changes of normal oral epithelial cells under the effect of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg of 250 and 125 µg/ml concentrations were captured using an inverted microscope (Leica, Germany) equipped with the digital microscopy camera [ 46 ]. Results And Discussion Evaluations of BC yield in the presence of eggshell, chemically-derived HAp, and eggshell-derived HAp Eggshell is a zero value waste, as well as the contaminant, have drawback against the environment which mainly consisted of sufficient quantities of calcium carbonate (94%), magnesium carbonate (1%), calcium phosphate (1%), and organic matter (4%) [ 42 ]. The management of large amounts of eggshell waste annually produced in the world is problematic as generally this material is only disposed of at landfills with odor production and microbial growth [ 47 ]. Table 1 shows a preliminary evaluation of bacterial cellulose production in the presence of each eggshell, eggshell-derived HAp, and chemically-derived HAp, while Table 2 shows detailed data of evaluation of bacterial cellulose production. Table 1 Preliminary evaluation of bacterial cellulose production in the presence of each of eggshell, eggshell-derived HAp, and chemically-derived HAp. Sample pH Reducing sugar (g/L) Cellulose Yield (g/L) Increase (I) or decrease (D) ratio in Cellulose yield (%) Initial Final Initial Final HS (control) 6.1 4.9 20 5.6 1.22 - Eggshell (0.1%) 6.2 7.2 20 8.8 1.37 12.29 (I) Eggshell-HAp (0.1%) 6.3 7.1 20 5.7 1.83 50 (I) Chemical-HAp (0.1%) 6.2 7.1 20 7.2 1.84 50.8 (I) As shown in Table 2 it was evident that the BC production in the presence of Eg, HA-ch, or HA-Eg at a concentration of 0.1% to the culture medium before inoculation of G. xylinum does not cause any change in the pH level. Meanwhile, at the end of the cultivation period,, the pH values were significantly increased by more than 7 and that could be attributed to the fact that the redox reactions occurred among the metabolic components in the HS culture medium, which consumed the H + and led to the increase in the pH value of the cultivated culture medium. During the cultivation period, it was noted that the addition of HA-Eg and HA-ch at 0.05% exhibited the maximum BC production with 59% and 75% when compared with the standard HS culture medium (i.e. without any addition). In contrast, the incorporation of Eggshell to the culture medium was found to be insignificant in terms of the BC productivity, in which the BC production was increased by 12% at 0.1% Eggshell concentration. Releasing of Phosphorus caused a decrease in the pH value only when it was from inorganic P. and there was a significant correlation between the culture pH and P mineralization. Moreover, it is more noticeable than the process of consuming glucose with 0.05% of HA-Eg and HA-ch was increased more than other concentrations. The pH level has been a slight change from 6 to 6.3 and at the end of the cultivation period (i. e. 7th day) and that could be related to the maximum BC productivity, which still maintains the buffering capacity of the culture medium and thus resistance the gluconic acid action [ 43 , 44 ]. The vital role of HA-Eg and HA-ch on the BC productivity explains that the minerals such as calcium, magnesium, and phosphate group were greatly contributed to the processes of cell division and assisted in the various biological processes within it and the phosphate group was may be responsible for the buffering capacity of the culture medium through the cultivation period, and this, in turn, contributed to an increase in its growth, glucose uptake, and decrease the action of gluconic acid on the pH value and thus an increase in its BC production. While at concentrations of more than 0.25%, the culture medium becomes more turbidity and the level of BC production would be decreased, and this may be attributed to impeding the movement of the bacterium in the culture medium and the lack of ease to obtaining the nutrient elements for their growth [ 43 , 48 ]. Table 2 Effect of different eggshell, chemically-derived HAp, and eggshell-derived HAp concentrations on the composite formation and the cellulose yield. Eggshell concentration (%) HS (control) 0.025 0.05 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.75 pH Initial 6 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.1 Final 6.4 6.7 7 7.1 7.4 7.4 4.9 Reducing sugar (g/L) Initial 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Final 6.7 5.7 8.8 7.6 10.2 9.7 5.6 Cellulose yield (g/L) 1.21 1.23 1.37 1.24 1.03 0.91 1.22 Eggshell-derived HAp concentrations (%) HS (control) 0.025 0.05 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.75 pH Initial 6 6.3 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.6 6.1 Final 6.4 6.7 7.2 7.1 7.3 7.3 4.9 Reducing sugar (g/L) Initial 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Final 8.5 5.7 5.7 5.5 5.9 7.8 5.6 Cellulose yield (g/L) 1.48 1.94 1.83 1.91 1.68 1.03 1.22 Eggshell-derived HAp concentrations (%) HS (control) 0.025 0.05 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.75 pH Initial 6 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.5 6.6 6.1 Final 6.4 6.3 7.1 7.1 7.4 7.1 4.9 Reducing sugar (g/L) Initial 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Final 6.2 6.6 7.2 9.4 6.8 7.3 5.6 Cellulose yield (g/L) 1.77 2.14 1.84 1.45 0.96 0.81 1.22 XRD Figure 1 represents XRD analysis of as-prepared BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composite samples. The diffraction peaks at 2θ around 15o and 20o are attributed to cellulose structure. These peaks are corresponding to the planes (1 0 0) and (1 1 0) of cellulose (Cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strains ATCC 53524 and ATCC 23768: Pellicle formation, post-synthesis aggregation, and fiber density). Otherwise, the addition of inorganic materials (eggshell and HAp) to the in-situ production of BC led to the disappearance of BC peaks that referred to good incorporation of the BC with Eg and HA as resulting in modified BC production condition. It can be noticed from the figure that the eggshell powder (sample BC/Eg) was converted from CaCO 3 (the main component of eggshell) to tricalcium phosphate (Ca 3 (PO 4 ) 2 , Card # 00-151-7238) in the growth medium of the bacteria ( G. xylinum ) during the synthesis of cellulose by this bacteria. Whereas, the addition of chemically-derived HAp (sample BC/HA-ch) to the bacterial culture medium produced the composite based on bacterial cellulose and combined tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and HAp (Card # 00-901-3629), where TCP was the main crystalline phase. In contrast, incorporation of eggshell-derived HAp (sample BC/HA-Eg) in the culture medium also yielded bacterial cellulose and combined HAp and TCP, but, HAp was the main crystalline phase. FT-IR The main characteristic functional groups in the composites under investigation were determined using FT-IR analysis. Figure 2 shows the FT-IR of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composites. The spectrum was operated in the wavenumber range of 4000–400 cm − 1 . The very weak and shallow peaks observed around 3274 and 2970 were assigned to (O-H) stretching vibration mode and stretching vibration of methylene (–CH 2 –), respectively, of BC. The peak allocated around 1642 cm − 1 was attributed to the bending vibration mode of (O-H) group. Moreover, the mean characteristic peaks of hydroxyapatite (HAp) can be detected from the figure. Where, the peaks observed in the range 900–1150 cm − 1 were attributed to the asymmetric stretching vibration mode of PO 4 group [ 49 ]. This peaks range was split into sharp peaks for BC/HA-ch and BC/HA-Eg composite samples, whereas, it was only one peak for weak shoulder for BC/Eg composite. This can be explained by the formation of poor-crystalline HAp during the in situ formation of bacterial cellulose with the eggshell waste by using phosphate ions presented already in the bacteria growth medium, while, splitting of this peak in case of the composites based on bacterial cellulose and HAp prepared from CaCO 3 chemical or eggshell indicated to the well-crystallinity of HAp added to the bacteria medium. substitution, as identified by characteristic peaks of CO 3 2− at around 875 and 1415 cm − 1 , which are attributed to the vibrational modes of the carbonate [ 50 ]. These peaks were stronger and sharper for BC/Eg composite than the other two composites, which is an acceptable result as the eggshell containing carbonate ions. The carbonated HAp is more favorable for implantation due to its more resorbability than the pure HAp [ 51 ]. In addition, the peaks at 561 and 600 cm − 1 were assigned to P-O-P vibration mode [ 52 , 53 ]. SEM/EDX The morphology and the elemental analysis of the composites were examined using SEM/EDX. Figure 3 shows SEM micrographs of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composites. From the figure, it can be observed that all samples were characterized by good homogeneity in the morphology and microstructure, and there was no significant difference among the composite samples in the morphology. Interestingly, EDX analysis showed a peak of phosphorus appeared in BC/Eg composite sample, where, the starting eggshell did not contain any phosphate ions. Likely, the calcium ions released from the eggshell particles were combined with the phosphate ions presented originally in bacterial growth medium to form nuclei of Ca-phosphate crystals. This finding was confirmed from the Ca/P atomic ratio calculated from EDX analysis, where, this ratio was 1.35 (Table 3 ) which is close to the ratio in hydroxyapatite crystal (1.67). In contrast, this ratio was far from the ratio in HAp for BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composites (0.56 and 0.83 respectively). This was mostly due to the precipitation of more phosphate ions presented in the growth medium on the composite surface. In Vitro Bioactivity Test The in vitro degradation and bioactivity of the prepared composites were studied by immersion of the samples in SBF. This method is widely used as a strategy for examining the ability of a material to adhere to the living tissue. The key mark of the material biocompatibility is its facility to induce the formation of bone-like apatite crystals on its surface upon soaking in the SBF. Figure 4 presents the SEM coupled with EDX analysis of the surface of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composite samples after immersion in SBF for 30 days. As shown from SEM micrographs, new crystals of bone-like apatite layer were formed on all composite surfaces. The typical hydroxyapatite crystal shape can be observed on BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg samples, while, it was unobvious in the case of BC/Eg sample. The corresponding EDX spectra of the new crystals formed on the BC/HA-ch and BC/HA-Eg composite surfaces showed that the intensity of calcium atom was increased compared to EDX spectra of the samples before immersion in SBF (see Fig. 3 ). While there was no noticeable change in this ratio for BC/Eg sample. The Ca/P atomic ratio of the samples before and immersion in SBF was calculated from the EDX results (Table 3 ). As it can be seen, the calculated ratio of BC/EG sample was closer value (1.49) to the ratio in hydroxyapatite crystals (Ca/P = 1.67) than the other two composites. Moreover, the change of Ca/P ratio of BC/Eg before and after immersion in SBF was small (1.35 and 1.49, respectively), but, there were big differences in this ratio for BC/HA-ch and BC/HA-Eg samples. This can be explained likely by the precipitation of phosphate ions presented in the bacteria growth medium. The change of pH of the SBF incubated BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composite samples were tracked at different times. Figure 5 a demonstrates a change of SBF with the time during immersion in SBF up to 14 d. It can be observed from the figure that the profile of pH change for all samples was nearly similar, and the differences between the samples were insignificant (P > 0.05), where the pH was progressively decreased from 7.40 to about 6.68, 6.83, and 6.90 for BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg, respectively, till 7 d of incubation, followed by an increase up to the end of soaking time. Table 3 The calculated Ca/P atomic ratio of the samples before and immersion in SBF was calculated from the EDX analysis Before immersion in SBF Before immersion in SBF BC/Eg BC/HA-ch BC/HA-Eg BC/Eg BC/HA-ch BC/HA-Eg Ca/P 1.35 0.56 0.83 1.49 1.35 1.41 Calcium and phosphate ion concentrations in SBF were also measured as a sign of bone-like apatite layer formation on the composite surfaces. Figure 5 b and c show the concentration of calcium and phosphate ions, in SBF solution. Likewise, the release profiles of all samples were similar. Where, for calcium ion, the concentration was decreased after 1 d of immersion to become 83.0, 84.6, and 87.0 ppm for BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg, respectively. The calcium ion concentration fluctuated thereafter till the end of incubation time. On the other hand, the concentration of phosphate ions was abruptly decreased after 1 d of immersion to 57.1, 51.7, and 55.2 ppm, for BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg, respectively, followed by a slight change up to the end of the immersion time. The decrease of calcium and phosphate ions in the initial soaking time was due to using of such ions in the precipitation of calcium phosphate layer on the composite surfaces. The fluctuation of ion concentrations can be explained from the repeating deposition and dissolution process of the newly formed bone-like apatite layer. Biocompatibility Assay The in vitro biocompatibility of BC/HA-Eg, BC/HA-ch and BC/Eg was evaluated against the normal oral epithelial cells (OEC) (Fig. 6 ). The cytotoxic effect of the prepared composites, given in different concentrations of 15.63 to 250 µg/ml, showed more than 50% of viable cells and exhibited all concentrations of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg caused no toxic effect against OEC cells. Also, inverted microscopy (Fig. 7 ) revealed no morphological variations in the OEC cells treated with different composites from 125 to 250 µg/ml compared with the untreated cells. According to the SEM/EDX analysis, the BC/HA-Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/Eg improved the precipitation of hydroxyapatite. Hydroxyapatite made from natural bases or waste such as eggshells [ 35 , 54 ] is an excellent Ca and P source [ 55 ]. In our study, The high Ca/P ratio of hydroxyapatite supports the growth and survival of normal oral cells due to the increase in the expression of the calcium canal. In addition, calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) could notice any change in the external concentration of Ca 2+ and increase Ca 2+ entry (6–9). Also, the XRD pattern displayed that the composites (BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch and BC/HA-Eg) were mainly constituted of bacterial cellulose and combined tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and Hap. The phosphate group in both tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and Hap act as a buffering system to maintain the culture medium at neutral pH, which is the best for cell proliferation and differentiating [ 46 , 56 – 59 ]. In dental orthopedics, tricalcium phosphate and Hydroxyapatite have been used to coat the implant; the coating materials stimulate new bone formation and increase protein adsorption on the interior surfaces, leading to enhanced cell adhesion [ 60 , 61 ]. Conclusion The bioactive composites based on eggshell wastes, hydroxyapatite (HAp) synthesized from eggshell, or HAp synthesized from chemicals and bacterial cellulose (BC) were successfully prepared in situ by G. xylinum by using agricultural residues as an alternative culture media without any supplementation. FTIR analysis showed the main functional groups of BC and the ceramic fillers. Furthermore, SEM/EDX analysis presented that the produced composites were characterized by good homogeneity, and the in vitro bioactivity test in SBF demonstrated that the composites under investigation were induced the formation of a bon-like apatite layer on their surface. Finally, the in vitro cell viability test was confirmed good biocompatibility against the composites which expectedly are as pure as to be used safely in different biomedical applications. In the future work, based on good biocompatibility results of BC/eggshell composite, we`ll emphasize the possibility to prepare composites based on bacterial cellulose and eggshell directly without converting the last one to HAp. This approach will save extra costs for the production of this kind of composite. Declarations Acknowledgements We would like to thank the National Research Centre, and Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University (Girls), Egypt for the possibility to use their facilities. Compliance with Ethical Standards There are no conflicts of interest. The research does not involve human participants and in vivo animals tests. References D. Klemm, D. Schumann, U. Udhardt, S. Marsch, Bacterial synthesized cellulose—artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog. Polym. Sci. 26 , 1561–1603 (2001) S. Sheykhnazari, T. Tabarsa, A. Ashori, A. Shakeri, M. Golalipour, Bacterial synthesized cellulose nanofibers; Effects of growth times and culture mediums on the structural characteristics. Carbohydr. Polym. 86 , 1187–1191 (2011) R.M. Brown Jr., A.C. Millard, P.J. Campagnola, Macromolecular structure of cellulose studied by second-harmonic generation imaging microscopy. Opt. Lett. 28 , 2207–2209 (2003) C. Castro, R. Zuluaga, C. Álvarez, J.-L. Putaux, G. Caro, O.J. Rojas et al., Bacterial cellulose produced by a new acid-resistant strain of Gluconacetobacter genus. Carbohydr. Polym. 89 , 1033–1037 (2012) W.-C. Lin, C.-C. Lien, H.-J. Yeh, C.-M. Yu, Hsu S-h. Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose–chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 94 , 603–611 (2013) F. Esa, S.M. Tasirin, N.A. Rahman, Overview of bacterial cellulose production and application. Agric. Agric. Sci. Proc. 2 , 113–119 (2014) A.F. Jozala, L.C. de Lencastre-Novaes, A.M. Lopes, V. de Carvalho Santos-Ebinuma, P.G. Mazzola, A. Pessoa-Jr et al., Bacterial nanocellulose production and application: a 10-year overview. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100 , 2063–2072 (2016) J. Li, X. Wei, Q. Wang, J. Chen, G. Chang, L. Kong et al., Homogeneous isolation of nanocellulose from sugarcane bagasse by high pressure homogenization. Carbohydr. Polym. 90 , 1609–1613 (2012) F. Mohammadkazemi, M. Azin, A. Ashori, Production of bacterial cellulose using different carbon sources and culture media. Carbohydr. Polym. 117 , 518–523 (2015) M. Moosavi-Nasab, A. Yousefi, Biotechnological production of cellulose by Gluconacetobacter xylinus from agricultural waste. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 9 , 94–101 (2011) B. Rivas, A.B. Moldes, J.M. Domínguez, J.C. Parajó, Lactic acid production from corn cobs by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation: a mathematical interpretation. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 34 , 627–634 (2004) Z. Shi, Y. Zhang, G.O. Phillips, G. Yang, Utilization of bacterial cellulose in food. Food Hydrocoll. 35 , 539–545 (2014) A. Cavka, X. Guo, S.-J. Tang, S. Winestrand, L.J. Jönsson, F. Hong, Production of bacterial cellulose and enzyme from waste fiber sludge. Biotechnol. Biofuels 6 , 25 (2013) Y. Huang, C. Zhu, J. Yang, Y. Nie, C. Chen, D. Sun, Recent advances in bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 21 , 1–30 (2014) E.E. Kiziltas, A. Kiziltas, S.C. Bollin, D.J. Gardner, Preparation and characterization of transparent PMMA–cellulose-based nanocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 127 , 381–389 (2015) F.P. Gomes, N.H. Silva, E. Trovatti, L.S. Serafim, M.F. Duarte, A.J. Silvestre et al., Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter sacchari using dry olive mill residue. Biomass Bioenerg. 55 , 205–211 (2013) N. Tyagi, S. Suresh, Production of cellulose from sugarcane molasses using Gluconacetobacter intermedius SNT-1: optimization & characterization. J. Clean. Prod. 112 , 71–80 (2016) D. Lin, P. Lopez-Sanchez, R. Li, Z. Li, Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii CGMCC 3917 using only waste beer yeast as nutrient source. Bioresour. Technol. 151 , 113–119 (2014) Z. Li, L. Wang, J. Hua, S. Jia, J. Zhang, H. Liu, Production of nano bacterial cellulose from waste water of candied jujube-processing industry using Acetobacter xylinum. Carbohydr. Polym. 120 , 115–119 (2015) B.S. Hungund, S. Gupta, Improved production of bacterial cellulose from Gluconacetobacter persimmonis GH-2. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2 , 127–133 (2010) F. Goelzer, P. Faria-Tischer, J. Vitorino, M.-R. Sierakowski, C. Tischer, Production and characterization of nanospheres of bacterial cellulose from Acetobacter xylinum from processed rice bark. Mater. Sci. Engineering: C 29 , 546–551 (2009) A. Jeihanipour, K. Karimi, M.J. Taherzadeh, Enhancement of ethanol and biogas production from high-crystalline cellulose by different modes of NMO pretreatment. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 105 , 469–476 (2010) M.U. Rani, K.A. Appaiah, Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii UAC09 using coffee cherry husk. J. Food Sci. Technol. 50 , 755–762 (2013) A.A. El-Henawy, A.H. Basta, H. El-Saied, E.H. Abdel-Shakour, M.S. Hasanin, H.H. El-Sheikh, Discovery Potent of Bagasse (CMC-L-Phe) As Bioactive Material Based on DFT Calculations. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2018;13 C. Sonenklar, Famous for egg waste. Research/Penn State News, Penn State University 20 , 1–2 (1999) J. Hecht. Eggshells break into collagen market. NEW SCIENTIST PUBL EXPEDITING INC 200 MEACHAM AVE, ELMONT, NY 11003 USA; 1999 W. Daengprok, W. Garnjanagoonchorn, Y. Mine, Fermented pork sausage fortified with commercial or hen eggshell calcium lactate. Meat Sci. 62 , 199–204 (2002) Z. Wei, C. Xu, B. Li, Application of waste eggshell as low-cost solid catalyst for biodiesel production. Bioresour. Technol. 100 , 2883–2885 (2009) S. Best, A. Porter, E. Thian, J. Huang, Bioceramics: past, present and for the future. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 28 , 1319–1327 (2008) C. Tan, A. Yaghoubi, S. Ramesh, S. Adzila, J. Purbolaksono, M. Hassan et al., Sintering and mechanical properties of MgO-doped nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite. Ceram. Int. 39 , 8979–8983 (2013) M. Sivakumar, T.S. Kumar, K. Shantha, K.P. Rao, Development of hydroxyapatite derived from Indian coral. Biomaterials 17 , 1709–1714 (1996) L.S. Ozyegin, F.N. Oktar, G. Goller, E.S. Kayali, T. Yazici, Plasma-sprayed bovine hydroxyapatite coatings. Mater. Lett. 58 , 2605–2609 (2004) M. Ozawa, S. Suzuki, Microstructural development of natural hydroxyapatite originated from fish-bone waste through heat treatment. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 85 , 1315–1317 (2002) G. Gergely, F. Wéber, I. Lukács, A.L. Tóth, Z.E. Horváth, J. Mihály et al., Preparation and characterization of hydroxyapatite from eggshell. Ceram. Int. 36 , 803–806 (2010) D. Goloshchapov, V. Kashkarov, N. Rumyantseva, P. Seredin, A. Lenshin, B. Agapov et al., Synthesis of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite by precipitation using hen's eggshell. Ceram. Int. 39 , 4539–4549 (2013) D.S.R. Krishna, A. Siddharthan, S. Seshadri, T.S. Kumar, A novel route for synthesis of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite from eggshell waste. J. Mater. Science: Mater. Med. 18 , 1735–1743 (2007) E.M. Rivera, M. Araiza, W. Brostow, V.M. Castano, J. Dıaz-Estrada, R. Hernández et al., Synthesis of hydroxyapatite from eggshells. Mater. Lett. 41 , 128–134 (1999) K. Sanosh, M.-C. Chu, A. Balakrishnan, T. Kim, S.-J. Cho, Utilization of biowaste eggshells to synthesize nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite powders. Mater. Lett. 63 , 2100–2102 (2009) A. Toibah, F. Misran, A. Shaaban, Z. Mustafa, Effect of pH condition during hydrothermal synthesis on the properties of hydroxyapatite from eggshell waste. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 13 , 4958–4969 (2019) V. Trakoolwannachai, P. Kheolamai, S. Ummartyotin, Development of hydroxyapatite from eggshell waste and a chitosan-based composite: In vitro behavior of human osteoblast-like cell (Saos-2) cultures. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 134 , 557–564 (2019) S.-C. Wu, H.-C. Hsu, S.-K. Hsu, Y.-C. Chang, W.-F. Ho, Effects of heat treatment on the synthesis of hydroxyapatite from eggshell powders. Ceram. Int. 41 , 10718–10724 (2015) S.-C. Wu, H.-C. Hsu, S.-K. Hsu, Y.-C. Chang, W.-F. Ho, Synthesis of hydroxyapatite from eggshell powders through ball milling and heat treatment. J. Asian. Ceam. Soc. 4 , 85–90 (2016) M. Abdelraof, M.S. Hasanin, H. El -Saied, Ecofriendly green conversion of potato peel wastes to high productivity bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr. Polym. 211 , 75–83 (2019) M. Abdelraof, M.S. Hasanin, M.M. Farag, H.Y. Ahmed, Green synthesis of bacterial cellulose/bioactive glass nanocomposites: Effect of glass nanoparticles on cellulose yield, biocompatibility and antimicrobial activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 138 , 975–985 (2019) G.L. Miller, Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar. Anal. Chem. 31 , 426–428 (1959) H.Y. Ahmed, N. Safwat, R. Shehata, E.H. Althubaiti, S. Kareem, A. Atef et al., Synthesis of Natural Nano-Hydroxyapatite from Snail Shells and Its Biological Activity: Antimicrobial, Antibiofilm, and Biocompatibility. Membranes 12 , 408 (2022) S. Mignardi, L. Archilletti, L. Medeghini, C. De Vito, Valorization of Eggshell Biowaste for Sustainable Environmental Remediation. Sci. Rep. 10 , 2436 (2020) E. Bilgi, E. Bayir, A. Sendemir-Urkmez, E.E. Hames, Optimization of bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus using carob and haricot bean. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 90 , 2–10 (2016) J. Rocha, A. Lemos, S. Kannan, S. Agathopoulos, J. Ferreira, Hydroxyapatite scaffolds hydrothermally grown from aragonitic cuttlefish bones. J. Mater. Chem. 15 , 5007–5011 (2005) R. Murugan, S. Ramakrishna, Production of ultra-fine bioresorbable carbonated hydroxyapatite. Acta Biomater. 2 , 201–206 (2006) C. Rodrigues, P. Serricella, A. Linhares, R. Guerdes, R. Borojevic, M. Rossi et al., Characterization of a bovine collagen–hydroxyapatite composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 24 , 4987–4997 (2003) M.M. Farag, M.M. Ahmed, N.M. Abdallah, W. Swieszkowski, A.M. Shehabeldine, The combined antibacterial and anticancer properties of nano Ce-containing Mg-phosphate ceramic. Life Sci. 257 , 117999 (2020) P. Tamilselvi, A. Yelilarasi, M. Hema, R.J.N.B. Anbarasan, Synthesis of hierarchical structured MgO by sol-gel method. 2013;2:130106 S. Ummartyotin, H. Manuspiya, Eggshell waste: An effective source of hydroxyapatite for photocatalyst. Journal of Metals, Materials and Minerals. 2018;28 M. Akram, R. Ahmed, I. Shakir, W.A.W. Ibrahim, R. Hussain, Extracting hydroxyapatite and its precursors from natural resources. J. Mater. Sci. 49 , 1461–1475 (2014) M.M. Farag, Z.M. Al-Rashidy, M.M. Ahmed, In vitro drug release behavior of Ce-doped nano-bioactive glass carriers under oxidative stress. J. Mater. Science: Mater. Med. 30 , 1–15 (2019) T. Numata, Y. Okada, Molecular determinants of sensitivity and conductivity of human TRPM7 to Mg2 + and Ca2+. Channels 2 , 283–286 (2008) E.S. Day, L. Osborn, A. Whitty, Effect of divalent cations on the affinity and selectivity of α4 integrins towards the integrin ligands vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1: Ca 2 + activation of integrin α4β1 confers a distinct ligand specificity. Cell. communication & adhesion 9 , 205–219 (2002) M. Goldberg, P. Krohicheva, A. Fomin, D. Khairutdinova, O. Antonova, A. Baikin et al., In situ magnesium calcium phosphate cements formation: From one pot powders precursors synthesis to in vitro investigations. Bioactive Mater. 5 , 644–658 (2020) H.W. Kim, J.C. Knowles, H.E. Kim. Hydroxyapatite and gelatin composite foams processed via novel freeze-drying and crosslinking for use as temporary hard tissue scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. 2005;72:136 – 45 S.V. Dorozhkin, Dental applications of calcium orthophosphates (CaPO4). J. Dent. Res. 1 , 1007 (2019) Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Reviewers agreed at journal 25 May, 2022 Editor assigned by journal 24 May, 2022 First submitted to journal 18 May, 2022 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-1670361","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":108417372,"identity":"898ffce7-bcc5-4550-bc49-99a1de292f16","order_by":0,"name":"Mohamed Abdelraof","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mohamed","middleName":"","lastName":"Abdelraof","suffix":""},{"id":108417373,"identity":"945b28fd-6e2e-4b45-a45e-be3839d164cb","order_by":1,"name":"Mohammad M. Farag","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mohammad","middleName":"M.","lastName":"Farag","suffix":""},{"id":108417374,"identity":"292e5580-fe51-4852-9f1b-7280bbe09ed6","order_by":2,"name":"Zainab Mohammed Al-Rashidy","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5994-1206","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zainab","middleName":"Mohammed","lastName":"Al-Rashidy","suffix":""},{"id":108417375,"identity":"491bdc78-2683-4912-9e5f-f2f59968b0e9","order_by":3,"name":"Hanaa Y. A. Ahmed","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hanaa","middleName":"Y. A.","lastName":"Ahmed","suffix":""},{"id":108417376,"identity":"31b40373-fc96-47fe-9e49-f9fcde92effc","order_by":4,"name":"Houssni El-Saied","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Houssni","middleName":"","lastName":"El-Saied","suffix":""},{"id":108417377,"identity":"46a3c1de-efba-4113-813c-4b8b9476c6ec","order_by":5,"name":"Mohamed S. Hasanin","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mohamed","middleName":"S.","lastName":"Hasanin","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2022-05-18 16:23:46","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1670361/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1670361/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":22082608,"identity":"f136f298-874e-4ac3-8db1-6d5321bb291f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-31 16:08:27","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":167367,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eXRD patterns of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composites.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1670361/v1/53964c299a67245a2d4bf3ef.png"},{"id":22079734,"identity":"68ef119c-edef-4a2b-ab87-79562735f58c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-31 15:58:26","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":212083,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eFT-IR of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composites.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1670361/v1/d9771ff19617dfcf481bd345.png"},{"id":22083416,"identity":"21ca5892-8b60-4e48-add2-fbc178aa5237","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-31 16:13:27","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":408275,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSEM coupled with EDX analysis of (a) BC/Eg, (b)BC/HA-ch, and (c) BC/HA-Eg composites.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1670361/v1/1414a4bf14bc7df133a249f2.png"},{"id":22081570,"identity":"fdd7974b-bcbd-4f6f-982f-98a584a980cd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-31 16:03:27","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":378954,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSEM coupled with EDX analysis of (a) BC/Eg, (b)BC/HA-ch, and (c) BC/HA-Eg composites after immersion in SBF for 30 days.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1670361/v1/52759c35668cb83426ca1ddd.png"},{"id":22079736,"identity":"47ac5cff-1afc-4b85-95a5-83e291f875ab","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-31 15:58:27","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":107930,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(a) pH, (b) Ca\u003csup\u003e2+\u003c/sup\u003e ion concentration (ppm), and (c) phosphate ion concentration (ppm) of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composites after immersion in SBF.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1670361/v1/8f2d5404f13d969ee14a927f.png"},{"id":22079739,"identity":"f2f2e6e0-79e3-4969-921f-545c09a01788","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-31 15:58:27","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":80713,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eThe \u003cem\u003eIn vitro \u003c/em\u003ecell viability of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composites in normal oral cell lines as measured with MTT assay.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1670361/v1/e467e10f4bd030595ccaeb6f.png"},{"id":22079740,"identity":"a3362d3c-4970-4452-83da-b16a5db8fbd4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-31 15:58:27","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":593986,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMorphological characteristics of OEC cells treated with BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg observed under an inverted microscope after 24 h. The OEC normal cells stained with a crystal violet stain. (a)\u0026nbsp;Control OEC cells at 24 h, (b) Cells treated with (250 µg mL\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e) of BC/Eg, (c) Cells treated with (250 µg mL\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e) of BC/HA-ch, (d) Cells treated with (250 µg mL\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e) of the sample BC/HA-Eg, (e) Cells treated with (125 µg mL\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e) of BC/Eg, (f) Cells treated with (125 µg mL\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e) of BC/HA-ch, and (g) Cells treated with (125 µg mL\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e) of the sample BC/HA-Eg Magnification: × 40.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1670361/v1/95ecb98e614e587c4bfe9a8d.png"},{"id":22083418,"identity":"859dd05f-bea6-45b5-a426-b35ed18b1495","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-31 16:13:30","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1839996,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1670361/v1/81d94219-8f30-4301-97fb-317089f86f8b.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"Green synthesis of bioactive hydroxyapatite/cellulose composites from food industrial wastes","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eBiopolymers are a large group of polymers that are produced from living organisms. Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a unique material made in surface culture by such rod-shaped Gram-negative bacteria as \u003cem\u003eGluconacetobacter xylinum\u003c/em\u003e. However, the extraction of cellulose from other components found naturally in the plants has many drawbacks because hazardous chemicals are used in this process. Some bacterial strains can produce bacterial cellulose (BC) with a high purity degree. In this process, bacteria are used as the nutrients to produce cellulose. Hence, the cost of the nutrients plays an important role in the production process economics. Additionally, is one of the most abundant macromolecule on Earth [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e]. Although its production is mostly by vascular plants, an alternative route that used to produce from another resource such as bacterial systems [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR3 CR4\" citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. Some kinds of bacteria can produce cellulose with the same as cellulose produced by higher plants and algae, but overall, it exhibits extra chemical pure. Due to its unique physical, chemical, and mechanical properties that involve high crystallinity, high water holding capacity, large surface area, elasticity, mechanical strength, and biocompatibility, thus BC has potential applications in edible packing as a food contact packaging material. In medicine, as wound dressing materials, artificial skin, vascular grafts, scaffolds for tissue engineering, artificial blood vessels, medical pads, dental implants [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. In other industries products, such as sponges to collect leaking oil in drug delivery agents, capsule shells, oil spill cleanup sponge; mineral and oil recovery; leather products, sports items; ultra-filters for water purification; audio speaker diaphragm; plywood laminates; specialty papers and polyesters; automotive and aircraft bodies and materials for absorbing toxins and optoelectronics materials (liquid crystal displays) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeveral genera that have shown the ability to synthesize cellulose include \u003cem\u003eSarcina, Agrobacterium, Rhizobium\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eAcetobacter\u003c/em\u003e also known as \u003cem\u003eGluconacetobacter\u003c/em\u003e. The most efficient producer of BC, a Gram negative and acetic acid bacterium \u003cem\u003eGluconacetobacterxylinus\u003c/em\u003e is the model microorganism for basic and applied studies on cellulose. G. xylinus produces an extra-cellular gel-like material or pellicle, which comprises a random assembly of cellulose ribbons, composed of several micro-fibrils. This organism and its product were first identified and characterized over a century ago [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]. A three-dimensional interconnected reticular pellicle is produced under static fermentation, whereas agitated and stirred conditions to produce irregularly shaped, sphere-like cellulose particles [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. However, the high cost of fermentation media has limited the industrial production of BC, as such media account for 30% of the total production cost [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. Thus, finding new cost-effective culture media to achieve the highest yield of BC in large-scale industrial applications is paramount and requires new carbon and nitrogen sources. The Hestrin\u0026ndash; Schramm (HS) medium is commonly used in the cultivation of BC. However, this medium is expensive and requires additional products, such as glucose, yeast, peptone, etc. Thus, wider applications of BC depend on practical considerations concerning scale-up capability and production costs [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR13\" citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn recent years, studies have focused on a variety of cellulose-producing bacterial strains, inexpensive nutrient sources, and supplementary materials for the production of inexpensive BC [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. Different waste products from agricultural and industrial activities have been investigated as a means to improve the yield and decrease the cost of BC production, such as dry olive mill residue [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e], sugarcane molasses[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e], waste beer yeast [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e], wastewater from candy processing [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e], wood sugars [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e], waste from fruit processing [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e], lipid fermentation wastewater [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e], rice bark, konjac powder [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e], cotton-based textile waste [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e], and coffee bean husks [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. The use of such materials could improve the sustainability of BC production as well as reduce environmental pollution associated with the disposal of industrial wastes. The potential of BC goes beyond existing applications, especially if produced in large amounts from the inexpensive feedstock. Such applications may include specialty textiles, packaging, and advanced functional materials [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]. In this way, the high-value utilization of agricultural waste is regarded as beneficial in terms of economics, environment, and practicality [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEach year huge amounts of the eggs are consumed into foods such as cakes, mayonnaise, and fast foods [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e]. about 150,000 tons of eggshell waste is generated from the US only every year [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e]. The eggshell waste can be reused as fertilizer, animal feed constituents, and others [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. If high amounts of this kind of waste are kept in landfills they will attract rats and vermin due to the organic membrane attached to the shells [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e], therefore, most landfill owners do not like to dispose of eggshell wastes. Consequently, the complete recycling of eggshell waste is considered the best choice to solve this environmental and economic problem. The eggshells are considered a cheap, abundant, and natural source of CaCO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e compound which can be utilized in the synthesis of hydroxyapatite (HAp) which is one kind of bioceramic material. It has been reported that HAp is mostly preferred bioceramics, especially for fabrication of bone engineering scaffolds, due to their similarity of composition with the inorganic part of human bone [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e]. Synthetic HAp materials have been prepared by different methods, such as sol-gel, wet precipitation, solid-state reaction, and hydrothermal method, and they are usually prepared from chemicals. The natural precursors for the preparation of HAp are considered a versatile approach to obtaining pure final products free from toxic impurities and they give more advantageous properties, such as the pore structure carbonated constituent. Coral [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e], bovine bone [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e], and fishbone [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e] are examples of natural raw materials for HAp synthesis. However, the mean problems of those materials are changeability in their physical and chemical properties [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e]. Eggshell is considered the most natural raw material of the invariable chemical composition. Therefore, there have been numerous previous works that prepared HAp from eggshells as a natural source [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR35 CR36 CR37 CR38 CR39 CR40 CR41\" citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e]. Biocompatibility is an important quality of biomaterials and cytotoxicity tests are primary biocompatibility tests which measure the capacity of a material to impact on cellular viability. While a cell is in contact with a biomaterial, many reactions can occur, and a sensing Phenomenon will launch between this cell and the biomaterial [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e] Cells adhere to surfaces through adhesion proteins (i.e. fibronectin, collagen, laminin, vitro- nectin) using specific cell receptors, called integrins, attached to the cell membrane. Cell adhesion is the ability of a single cell to stick to another cell or an extracellular matrix (ECM). [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. Cell adhesion is involved in stimulating signals that regulate cell differentiation, cell cycle, cell migration, and cell survival [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe main objective of this work is in situ preparation of new bioactive composites based on BC synthesized by \u003cem\u003eG. xylinum\u003c/em\u003e by using agricultural residues as an alternative culture media without any supplementation and hydroxyapatite (HAp) derived from eggshell or HAp derived from chemicals, as well as, eggshell wastes were used added directly to the culture media for comparison. Accordingly, these bioactive composites were prepared almost from natural raw materials (eggshells and bacterial cellulose) which expectedly are as pure as to be used safely in different biomedical applications.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials And Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMaterials\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEggshell and membranes resulting from Egg processing were collected from the disposal of free markets. The collected eggshell waste without disease symptoms was selected and washed thoroughly with distilled water to remove additional residues from its surface and then heated at 105\u0026deg;C for 72 h to dry, sieved, and used as a template in the BC culture medium.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eMethods\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSynthesis of hydroxyapatite (HAp)\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eHydroxyapatite powder was prepared from eggshell waste. Briefly, collected hen eggshells were cleaned in hot distilled water and left to dry in the air. And then, they heat treated up to 900\u0026deg;C to give CaO. The calcined eggshell was dispersed in the water with a concentration of 0.5 M for 3 hours, and 0.3 M of phosphoric acid was added dropwise on the calcium solution under stirring. After complete reaction, the solution was left foraging for 1 day and then washed and filtered. The precipitate was dried and sintered at different temperatures ranging from 600\u0026deg;C to 900\u0026deg;C. For comparison, HAp was prepared from CaCO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e chemical following the same previous steps. The prepared powders were suspended in the bacterial cellulose growth media to prepare in situ composite materials. Moreover, the collected eggshell waste was also used in the in situ preparation of composite material. The composites based on bacterial cellulose (BC)/eggshell, BC/HAp synthesized from CaCO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e chemical, and BC/HAp synthesized from eggshell herein encoded as BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg, respectively.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003ePreparation Of Pure Bacterial Cellulose\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePreparation of bacterial cellulose was achieved by the standard strain \u003cem\u003eGluconacetobacter xylinum\u003c/em\u003e ATCC 10245 that was purchased from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA). Preliminary activation of \u003cem\u003eG. xylinum\u003c/em\u003e was carried out by cultivating it in Mannitol broth medium as described by Abdelraof, et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e] for 24 h. at 30 \u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003eC under shaking conditions. Subsequently, the activated strain was transferred to the standard HS culture medium for preparation of pure cellulose under standard culture optimization according to our previous report [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. At the end of the incubation period, the cellulose pellicles were separated from the culture medium under centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 10 min. Then, the cellulose pellicles were subjected to purification protocol as mentioned by Abdelraof, et al [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eIn Situ Preparation Of Bc/eg, Bc/ha-ch, And Bc/ha-eg\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn this regard, various concentrations of each of Eg, HA-ch, and HA-Eg (0.025\u0026ndash;0.75 g/ 100 ml) were incorporated into the standard culture medium of \u003cem\u003eG. xylinum\u003c/em\u003e for examined their ability to use it as a template to produce cellulose, and thus evaluation the formed composite. Investigation of different parameters such as pH value, and glucose consumption and the relationship between them during cultivation time of each concentration of these materials was carried out. Regarding the pH value, HS culture medium was adjusted at 6.0 and the variation in the pH value after the addition of Eg, HA-ch, or HA-Eg was recorded before inoculation. The sugar consumption was expressed by calculating the total reducing sugar concentration via DNS reagent [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e] using D-glucose as standard. After the fermentation process, BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composites were collected from the top of the culture medium and then purified like that of prepared pure BC [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. Consequently, pure composites were dried at 70\u0026deg;C for 24 h to evaluate the yield concentration in g/L. The influence of these materials on the cellulose yield can also be determined after purification of the composite [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e] by estimating the cellulose amount in the composite after subtracting the Eg, HA-ch, or HA-Eg concentration from the total weight of the composite. The increase or decrease of cellulose yield (%) after treatment can be calculated as follows:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e%=\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(A-B/A x 100\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhere A displayed the Cellulose production without any treatment, while B is the Cellulose producing after treatment\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eComposite Characterization\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe XRD analysis of the composite samples was conducted by Philips PW1390 X-ray diffractometer (U.S.D.) in the 2θ range from 20 to 70\u0026deg; in 0.02\u0026deg; steps at λ\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.5418 \u0026Aring; using CuKα radiation. Moreover, FTIR was performed for the samples using infrared absorption spectra at room temperature in the wavenumber range of 4000\u0026ndash;400 cm\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e using Fourier transform infrared (BRUKER). The prepared samples each of 2 mg were mixed with 200 mg KBr in an agate mortar and pressed into a pellet. For each sample, the FTIR spectrum was normalized with a blank KBr pellet. Furthermore, the sample surfaces were coated with a thin layer of gold for SEM and EDX analyses to study the morphology microstructure of the prepared composites.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eIn Vitro Biodegradation And Bioactivity Test\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe bone-forming activity \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e was tested in simulated body fluid (SBF) to monitor the formation of hydroxyl-carbonated apatite (HCA) on the surface of composites samples over time. The samples were placed into a vessel containing SBF and incubated at 37\u0026deg;C under pH 7.4 for periods 1, 3, 7, and d. At the predetermined periods, the ions\u0026rsquo; concentrations released from the samples into the incubating medium was measured by colorimetric kits (SPECTRUM, Egypt), and they were characterized by scanning electron microscope coupled with energy dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM/EDX), to investigate the hydroxyapatite layer formed on coatings surfaces.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eEvaluation Of The Cytotoxicity By Mtt Assay\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMTT assay was applied to reveal the viability of (OEC) normal oral epithelial cells under the effect of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg. Briefly, OEC cells were plated in 96-well culture plates and exposed to various concentrations (15.63, 31.25, 62.5, 125 and 250 \u0026micro;g/ml). In addition to controlling untreated cells. All cultures were incubated for 24 hours at 37˚C using a 5% CO2 incubator. At the end of the incubation period, the MTT solution (5mg/ml) was added to each well and incubated at 37 ˚C for 4 h. The absorbance was measured in triplicates at 570 nm using the ELISA Reader system (SunRise TECAN, Inc., USA). The morphological changes of normal oral epithelial cells under the effect of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg of 250 and 125 \u0026micro;g/ml concentrations were captured using an inverted microscope (Leica, Germany) equipped with the digital microscopy camera [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results And Discussion","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eEvaluations of BC yield in the presence of eggshell, chemically-derived HAp, and eggshell-derived HAp\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEggshell is a zero value waste, as well as the contaminant, have drawback against the environment which mainly consisted of sufficient quantities of calcium carbonate (94%), magnesium carbonate (1%), calcium phosphate (1%), and organic matter (4%) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e]. The management of large amounts of eggshell waste annually produced in the world is problematic as generally this material is only disposed of at landfills with odor production and microbial growth [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e]. Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e shows a preliminary evaluation of bacterial cellulose production in the presence of each eggshell, eggshell-derived HAp, and chemically-derived HAp, while Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e shows detailed data of evaluation of bacterial cellulose production.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePreliminary evaluation of bacterial cellulose production in the presence of each of eggshell, eggshell-derived HAp, and chemically-derived HAp.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"7\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSample\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epH\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReducing sugar (g/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCellulose Yield (g/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIncrease (I) or decrease (D) ratio in Cellulose yield (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInitial\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInitial\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHS (control)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.22\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEggshell (0.1%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.29 (I)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEggshell-HAp (0.1%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.83\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e50 (I)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChemical-HAp (0.1%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.84\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e50.8 (I)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAs shown in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e it was evident that the BC production in the presence of Eg, HA-ch, or HA-Eg at a concentration of 0.1% to the culture medium before inoculation of \u003cem\u003eG. xylinum\u003c/em\u003e does not cause any change in the pH level. Meanwhile, at the end of the cultivation period,, the pH values were significantly increased by more than 7 and that could be attributed to the fact that the redox reactions occurred among the metabolic components in the HS culture medium, which consumed the H\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e and led to the increase in the pH value of the cultivated culture medium.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuring the cultivation period, it was noted that the addition of HA-Eg and HA-ch at 0.05% exhibited the maximum BC production with 59% and 75% when compared with the standard HS culture medium (i.e. without any addition). In contrast, the incorporation of Eggshell to the culture medium was found to be insignificant in terms of the BC productivity, in which the BC production was increased by 12% at 0.1% Eggshell concentration. Releasing of Phosphorus caused a decrease in the pH value only when it was from inorganic P. and there was a significant correlation between the culture pH and P mineralization.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoreover, it is more noticeable than the process of consuming glucose with 0.05% of HA-Eg and HA-ch was increased more than other concentrations. The pH level has been a slight change from 6 to 6.3 and at the end of the cultivation period (i. e. 7th day) and that could be related to the maximum BC productivity, which still maintains the buffering capacity of the culture medium and thus resistance the gluconic acid action [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. The vital role of HA-Eg and HA-ch on the BC productivity explains that the minerals such as calcium, magnesium, and phosphate group were greatly contributed to the processes of cell division and assisted in the various biological processes within it and the phosphate group was may be responsible for the buffering capacity of the culture medium through the cultivation period, and this, in turn, contributed to an increase in its growth, glucose uptake, and decrease the action of gluconic acid on the pH value and thus an increase in its BC production. While at concentrations of more than 0.25%, the culture medium becomes more turbidity and the level of BC production would be decreased, and this may be attributed to impeding the movement of the bacterium in the culture medium and the lack of ease to obtaining the nutrient elements for their growth [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEffect of different eggshell, chemically-derived HAp, and eggshell-derived HAp concentrations on the composite formation and the cellulose yield.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"9\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c8\" colnum=\"8\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c9\" colnum=\"9\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" morerows=\"1\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"6\" nameend=\"c8\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEggshell concentration (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHS (control)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.025\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.05\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.75\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epH\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInitial\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReducing sugar (g/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInitial\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCellulose yield (g/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.23\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.24\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.03\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.91\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.22\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" morerows=\"1\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"6\" nameend=\"c8\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEggshell-derived HAp concentrations (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHS (control)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.025\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.05\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.75\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epH\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInitial\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReducing sugar (g/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInitial\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCellulose yield (g/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.48\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.94\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.83\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.91\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.68\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.03\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.22\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" morerows=\"1\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"6\" nameend=\"c8\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEggshell-derived HAp concentrations (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHS (control)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.025\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.05\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.75\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epH\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInitial\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReducing sugar (g/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInitial\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCellulose yield (g/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.77\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.84\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.45\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.96\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.81\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.22\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eXRD\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure \u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e represents XRD analysis of as-prepared BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composite samples. The diffraction peaks at 2θ around 15o and 20o are attributed to cellulose structure. These peaks are corresponding to the planes (1 0 0) and (1 1 0) of cellulose (Cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strains ATCC 53524 and ATCC 23768: Pellicle formation, post-synthesis aggregation, and fiber density). Otherwise, the addition of inorganic materials (eggshell and HAp) to the in-situ production of BC led to the disappearance of BC peaks that referred to good incorporation of the BC with Eg and HA as resulting in modified BC production condition. It can be noticed from the figure that the eggshell powder (sample BC/Eg) was converted from CaCO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e (the main component of eggshell) to tricalcium phosphate (Ca\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e(PO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e)\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, Card # 00-151-7238) in the growth medium of the bacteria (\u003cem\u003eG. xylinum\u003c/em\u003e) during the synthesis of cellulose by this bacteria. Whereas, the addition of chemically-derived HAp (sample BC/HA-ch) to the bacterial culture medium produced the composite based on bacterial cellulose and combined tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and HAp (Card # 00-901-3629), where TCP was the main crystalline phase. In contrast, incorporation of eggshell-derived HAp (sample BC/HA-Eg) in the culture medium also yielded bacterial cellulose and combined HAp and TCP, but, HAp was the main crystalline phase.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFT-IR\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe main characteristic functional groups in the composites under investigation were determined using FT-IR analysis. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e shows the FT-IR of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composites. The spectrum was operated in the wavenumber range of 4000\u0026ndash;400 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e. The very weak and shallow peaks observed around 3274 and 2970 were assigned to (O-H) stretching vibration mode and stretching vibration of methylene (\u0026ndash;CH\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026ndash;), respectively, of BC. The peak allocated around 1642 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e was attributed to the bending vibration mode of (O-H) group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoreover, the mean characteristic peaks of hydroxyapatite (HAp) can be detected from the figure. Where, the peaks observed in the range 900\u0026ndash;1150 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e were attributed to the asymmetric stretching vibration mode of PO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e group [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e]. This peaks range was split into sharp peaks for BC/HA-ch and BC/HA-Eg composite samples, whereas, it was only one peak for weak shoulder for BC/Eg composite. This can be explained by the formation of poor-crystalline HAp during the in situ formation of bacterial cellulose with the eggshell waste by using phosphate ions presented already in the bacteria growth medium, while, splitting of this peak in case of the composites based on bacterial cellulose and HAp prepared from CaCO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e chemical or eggshell indicated to the well-crystallinity of HAp added to the bacteria medium. substitution, as identified by characteristic peaks of CO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e\u003csup\u003e2\u0026minus;\u003c/sup\u003e at around 875 and 1415 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, which are attributed to the vibrational modes of the carbonate [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e]. These peaks were stronger and sharper for BC/Eg composite than the other two composites, which is an acceptable result as the eggshell containing carbonate ions. The carbonated HAp is more favorable for implantation due to its more resorbability than the pure HAp [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e]. In addition, the peaks at 561 and 600 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e were assigned to P-O-P vibration mode [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSEM/EDX\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe morphology and the elemental analysis of the composites were examined using SEM/EDX. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e shows SEM micrographs of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composites. From the figure, it can be observed that all samples were characterized by good homogeneity in the morphology and microstructure, and there was no significant difference among the composite samples in the morphology. Interestingly, EDX analysis showed a peak of phosphorus appeared in BC/Eg composite sample, where, the starting eggshell did not contain any phosphate ions. Likely, the calcium ions released from the eggshell particles were combined with the phosphate ions presented originally in bacterial growth medium to form nuclei of Ca-phosphate crystals. This finding was confirmed from the Ca/P atomic ratio calculated from EDX analysis, where, this ratio was 1.35 (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e) which is close to the ratio in hydroxyapatite crystal (1.67). In contrast, this ratio was far from the ratio in HAp for BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composites (0.56 and 0.83 respectively). This was mostly due to the precipitation of more phosphate ions presented in the growth medium on the composite surface.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eIn Vitro Bioactivity Test\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe in vitro degradation and bioactivity of the prepared composites were studied by immersion of the samples in SBF. This method is widely used as a strategy for examining the ability of a material to adhere to the living tissue. The key mark of the material biocompatibility is its facility to induce the formation of bone-like apatite crystals on its surface upon soaking in the SBF. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e presents the SEM coupled with EDX analysis of the surface of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composite samples after immersion in SBF for 30 days. As shown from SEM micrographs, new crystals of bone-like apatite layer were formed on all composite surfaces. The typical hydroxyapatite crystal shape can be observed on BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg samples, while, it was unobvious in the case of BC/Eg sample. The corresponding EDX spectra of the new crystals formed on the BC/HA-ch and BC/HA-Eg composite surfaces showed that the intensity of calcium atom was increased compared to EDX spectra of the samples before immersion in SBF (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). While there was no noticeable change in this ratio for BC/Eg sample. The Ca/P atomic ratio of the samples before and immersion in SBF was calculated from the EDX results (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). As it can be seen, the calculated ratio of BC/EG sample was closer value (1.49) to the ratio in hydroxyapatite crystals (Ca/P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.67) than the other two composites. Moreover, the change of Ca/P ratio of BC/Eg before and after immersion in SBF was small (1.35 and 1.49, respectively), but, there were big differences in this ratio for BC/HA-ch and BC/HA-Eg samples. This can be explained likely by the precipitation of phosphate ions presented in the bacteria growth medium.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe change of pH of the SBF incubated BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg composite samples were tracked at different times. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ea demonstrates a change of SBF with the time during immersion in SBF up to 14 d. It can be observed from the figure that the profile of pH change for all samples was nearly similar, and the differences between the samples were insignificant (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), where the pH was progressively decreased from 7.40 to about 6.68, 6.83, and 6.90 for BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg, respectively, till 7 d of incubation, followed by an increase up to the end of soaking time.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe calculated Ca/P atomic ratio of the samples before and immersion in SBF was calculated from the EDX analysis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"7\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBefore immersion in SBF\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBefore immersion in SBF\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBC/Eg\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBC/HA-ch\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBC/HA-Eg\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBC/Eg\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBC/HA-ch\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBC/HA-Eg\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCa/P\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.35\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.56\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.83\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.49\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.35\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.41\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCalcium and phosphate ion concentrations in SBF were also measured as a sign of bone-like apatite layer formation on the composite surfaces. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eb and c show the concentration of calcium and phosphate ions, in SBF solution. Likewise, the release profiles of all samples were similar. Where, for calcium ion, the concentration was decreased after 1 d of immersion to become 83.0, 84.6, and 87.0 ppm for BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg, respectively. The calcium ion concentration fluctuated thereafter till the end of incubation time. On the other hand, the concentration of phosphate ions was abruptly decreased after 1 d of immersion to 57.1, 51.7, and 55.2 ppm, for BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg, respectively, followed by a slight change up to the end of the immersion time. The decrease of calcium and phosphate ions in the initial soaking time was due to using of such ions in the precipitation of calcium phosphate layer on the composite surfaces. The fluctuation of ion concentrations can be explained from the repeating deposition and dissolution process of the newly formed bone-like apatite layer.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eBiocompatibility Assay\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e biocompatibility of BC/HA-Eg, BC/HA-ch and BC/Eg was evaluated against the normal oral epithelial cells (OEC) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e). The cytotoxic effect of the prepared composites, given in different concentrations of 15.63 to 250 \u0026micro;g/ml, showed more than 50% of viable cells and exhibited all concentrations of BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/HA-Eg caused no toxic effect against OEC cells. Also, inverted microscopy (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e) revealed no morphological variations in the OEC cells treated with different composites from 125 to 250 \u0026micro;g/ml compared with the untreated cells. According to the SEM/EDX analysis, the BC/HA-Eg, BC/HA-ch, and BC/Eg improved the precipitation of hydroxyapatite. Hydroxyapatite made from natural bases or waste such as eggshells [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e] is an excellent Ca and P source [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e55\u003c/span\u003e]. In our study, The high Ca/P ratio of hydroxyapatite supports the growth and survival of normal oral cells due to the increase in the expression of the calcium canal. In addition, calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) could notice any change in the external concentration of Ca\u003csup\u003e2+\u003c/sup\u003e and increase Ca\u003csup\u003e2+\u003c/sup\u003e entry (6\u0026ndash;9). Also, the XRD pattern displayed that the composites (BC/Eg, BC/HA-ch and BC/HA-Eg) were mainly constituted of bacterial cellulose and combined tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and Hap. The phosphate group in both tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and Hap act as a buffering system to maintain the culture medium at neutral pH, which is the best for cell proliferation and differentiating [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR57 CR58\" citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e59\u003c/span\u003e]. In dental orthopedics, tricalcium phosphate and Hydroxyapatite have been used to coat the implant; the coating materials stimulate new bone formation and increase protein adsorption on the interior surfaces, leading to enhanced cell adhesion [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e61\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe bioactive composites based on eggshell wastes, hydroxyapatite (HAp) synthesized from eggshell, or HAp synthesized from chemicals and bacterial cellulose (BC) were successfully prepared in situ by \u003cem\u003eG. xylinum\u003c/em\u003e by using agricultural residues as an alternative culture media without any supplementation. FTIR analysis showed the main functional groups of BC and the ceramic fillers. Furthermore, SEM/EDX analysis presented that the produced composites were characterized by good homogeneity, and the in vitro bioactivity test in SBF demonstrated that the composites under investigation were induced the formation of a bon-like apatite layer on their surface. Finally, the in vitro cell viability test was confirmed good biocompatibility against the composites which expectedly are as pure as to be used safely in different biomedical applications.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the future work, based on good biocompatibility results of BC/eggshell composite, we`ll emphasize the possibility to prepare composites based on bacterial cellulose and eggshell directly without converting the last one to HAp. This approach will save extra costs for the production of this kind of composite.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements \u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe would like to thank the National Research Centre, and Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University (Girls), Egypt for the possibility to use their facilities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompliance with Ethical Standards\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eThere are no conflicts of interest.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eThe research does not involve human participants and in vivo animals tests.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eD. Klemm, D. Schumann, U. Udhardt, S. Marsch, Bacterial synthesized cellulose\u0026mdash;artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog. Polym. Sci. \u003cstrong\u003e26\u003c/strong\u003e, 1561\u0026ndash;1603 (2001)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eS. Sheykhnazari, T. Tabarsa, A. Ashori, A. Shakeri, M. Golalipour, Bacterial synthesized cellulose nanofibers; Effects of growth times and culture mediums on the structural characteristics. Carbohydr. Polym. \u003cstrong\u003e86\u003c/strong\u003e, 1187\u0026ndash;1191 (2011)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eR.M. Brown Jr., A.C. Millard, P.J. Campagnola, Macromolecular structure of cellulose studied by second-harmonic generation imaging microscopy. Opt. Lett. \u003cstrong\u003e28\u003c/strong\u003e, 2207\u0026ndash;2209 (2003)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eC. Castro, R. Zuluaga, C. \u0026Aacute;lvarez, J.-L. Putaux, G. Caro, O.J. Rojas et al., Bacterial cellulose produced by a new acid-resistant strain of Gluconacetobacter genus. Carbohydr. Polym. \u003cstrong\u003e89\u003c/strong\u003e, 1033\u0026ndash;1037 (2012)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eW.-C. Lin, C.-C. Lien, H.-J. Yeh, C.-M. Yu, Hsu S-h. Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose\u0026ndash;chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr. Polym. \u003cstrong\u003e94\u003c/strong\u003e, 603\u0026ndash;611 (2013)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eF. Esa, S.M. Tasirin, N.A. Rahman, Overview of bacterial cellulose production and application. Agric. Agric. Sci. Proc. \u003cstrong\u003e2\u003c/strong\u003e, 113\u0026ndash;119 (2014)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eA.F. Jozala, L.C. de Lencastre-Novaes, A.M. Lopes, V. de Carvalho Santos-Ebinuma, P.G. Mazzola, A. Pessoa-Jr et al., Bacterial nanocellulose production and application: a 10-year overview. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. \u003cstrong\u003e100\u003c/strong\u003e, 2063\u0026ndash;2072 (2016)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJ. Li, X. Wei, Q. Wang, J. Chen, G. Chang, L. Kong et al., Homogeneous isolation of nanocellulose from sugarcane bagasse by high pressure homogenization. Carbohydr. Polym. \u003cstrong\u003e90\u003c/strong\u003e, 1609\u0026ndash;1613 (2012)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eF. Mohammadkazemi, M. Azin, A. Ashori, Production of bacterial cellulose using different carbon sources and culture media. Carbohydr. Polym. \u003cstrong\u003e117\u003c/strong\u003e, 518\u0026ndash;523 (2015)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eM. Moosavi-Nasab, A. Yousefi, Biotechnological production of cellulose by Gluconacetobacter xylinus from agricultural waste. Iran. J. Biotechnol. \u003cstrong\u003e9\u003c/strong\u003e, 94\u0026ndash;101 (2011)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eB. Rivas, A.B. Moldes, J.M. Dom\u0026iacute;nguez, J.C. Paraj\u0026oacute;, Lactic acid production from corn cobs by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation: a mathematical interpretation. Enzym. Microb. Technol. \u003cstrong\u003e34\u003c/strong\u003e, 627\u0026ndash;634 (2004)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZ. Shi, Y. Zhang, G.O. Phillips, G. Yang, Utilization of bacterial cellulose in food. Food Hydrocoll. \u003cstrong\u003e35\u003c/strong\u003e, 539\u0026ndash;545 (2014)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eA. Cavka, X. Guo, S.-J. Tang, S. Winestrand, L.J. J\u0026ouml;nsson, F. Hong, Production of bacterial cellulose and enzyme from waste fiber sludge. Biotechnol. Biofuels \u003cstrong\u003e6\u003c/strong\u003e, 25 (2013)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eY. Huang, C. Zhu, J. Yang, Y. Nie, C. Chen, D. Sun, Recent advances in bacterial cellulose. Cellulose \u003cstrong\u003e21\u003c/strong\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;30 (2014)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eE.E. Kiziltas, A. Kiziltas, S.C. Bollin, D.J. Gardner, Preparation and characterization of transparent PMMA\u0026ndash;cellulose-based nanocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. \u003cstrong\u003e127\u003c/strong\u003e, 381\u0026ndash;389 (2015)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eF.P. Gomes, N.H. Silva, E. Trovatti, L.S. Serafim, M.F. Duarte, A.J. Silvestre et al., Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter sacchari using dry olive mill residue. Biomass Bioenerg. \u003cstrong\u003e55\u003c/strong\u003e, 205\u0026ndash;211 (2013)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eN. Tyagi, S. Suresh, Production of cellulose from sugarcane molasses using Gluconacetobacter intermedius SNT-1: optimization \u0026amp; characterization. J. Clean. Prod. \u003cstrong\u003e112\u003c/strong\u003e, 71\u0026ndash;80 (2016)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eD. Lin, P. Lopez-Sanchez, R. Li, Z. Li, Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii CGMCC 3917 using only waste beer yeast as nutrient source. Bioresour. Technol. \u003cstrong\u003e151\u003c/strong\u003e, 113\u0026ndash;119 (2014)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZ. Li, L. Wang, J. Hua, S. Jia, J. Zhang, H. Liu, Production of nano bacterial cellulose from waste water of candied jujube-processing industry using Acetobacter xylinum. Carbohydr. Polym. \u003cstrong\u003e120\u003c/strong\u003e, 115\u0026ndash;119 (2015)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eB.S. Hungund, S. Gupta, Improved production of bacterial cellulose from Gluconacetobacter persimmonis GH-2. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. \u003cstrong\u003e2\u003c/strong\u003e, 127\u0026ndash;133 (2010)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eF. Goelzer, P. Faria-Tischer, J. Vitorino, M.-R. Sierakowski, C. Tischer, Production and characterization of nanospheres of bacterial cellulose from Acetobacter xylinum from processed rice bark. Mater. Sci. Engineering: C \u003cstrong\u003e29\u003c/strong\u003e, 546\u0026ndash;551 (2009)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eA. Jeihanipour, K. Karimi, M.J. Taherzadeh, Enhancement of ethanol and biogas production from high-crystalline cellulose by different modes of NMO pretreatment. Biotechnol. Bioeng. \u003cstrong\u003e105\u003c/strong\u003e, 469\u0026ndash;476 (2010)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eM.U. Rani, K.A. Appaiah, Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii UAC09 using coffee cherry husk. J. Food Sci. Technol. \u003cstrong\u003e50\u003c/strong\u003e, 755\u0026ndash;762 (2013)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eA.A. El-Henawy, A.H. Basta, H. El-Saied, E.H. Abdel-Shakour, M.S. Hasanin, H.H. El-Sheikh, Discovery Potent of Bagasse (CMC-L-Phe) As Bioactive Material Based on DFT Calculations. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2018;13\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eC. Sonenklar, Famous for egg waste. Research/Penn State News, Penn State University \u003cstrong\u003e20\u003c/strong\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;2 (1999)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJ. Hecht. Eggshells break into collagen market. NEW SCIENTIST PUBL EXPEDITING INC 200 MEACHAM AVE, ELMONT, NY 11003 USA; 1999\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eW. Daengprok, W. Garnjanagoonchorn, Y. Mine, Fermented pork sausage fortified with commercial or hen eggshell calcium lactate. Meat Sci. \u003cstrong\u003e62\u003c/strong\u003e, 199\u0026ndash;204 (2002)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZ. Wei, C. Xu, B. Li, Application of waste eggshell as low-cost solid catalyst for biodiesel production. Bioresour. Technol. \u003cstrong\u003e100\u003c/strong\u003e, 2883\u0026ndash;2885 (2009)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eS. Best, A. Porter, E. Thian, J. Huang, Bioceramics: past, present and for the future. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. \u003cstrong\u003e28\u003c/strong\u003e, 1319\u0026ndash;1327 (2008)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eC. Tan, A. Yaghoubi, S. Ramesh, S. Adzila, J. Purbolaksono, M. Hassan et al., Sintering and mechanical properties of MgO-doped nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite. Ceram. Int. \u003cstrong\u003e39\u003c/strong\u003e, 8979\u0026ndash;8983 (2013)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eM. Sivakumar, T.S. Kumar, K. Shantha, K.P. Rao, Development of hydroxyapatite derived from Indian coral. Biomaterials \u003cstrong\u003e17\u003c/strong\u003e, 1709\u0026ndash;1714 (1996)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eL.S. Ozyegin, F.N. Oktar, G. Goller, E.S. Kayali, T. Yazici, Plasma-sprayed bovine hydroxyapatite coatings. Mater. Lett. \u003cstrong\u003e58\u003c/strong\u003e, 2605\u0026ndash;2609 (2004)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eM. Ozawa, S. Suzuki, Microstructural development of natural hydroxyapatite originated from fish-bone waste through heat treatment. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. \u003cstrong\u003e85\u003c/strong\u003e, 1315\u0026ndash;1317 (2002)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eG. Gergely, F. W\u0026eacute;ber, I. Luk\u0026aacute;cs, A.L. T\u0026oacute;th, Z.E. Horv\u0026aacute;th, J. Mih\u0026aacute;ly et al., Preparation and characterization of hydroxyapatite from eggshell. Ceram. Int. \u003cstrong\u003e36\u003c/strong\u003e, 803\u0026ndash;806 (2010)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eD. Goloshchapov, V. Kashkarov, N. Rumyantseva, P. Seredin, A. Lenshin, B. Agapov et al., Synthesis of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite by precipitation using hen\u0026apos;s eggshell. Ceram. Int. \u003cstrong\u003e39\u003c/strong\u003e, 4539\u0026ndash;4549 (2013)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eD.S.R. Krishna, A. Siddharthan, S. Seshadri, T.S. Kumar, A novel route for synthesis of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite from eggshell waste. J. Mater. Science: Mater. Med. \u003cstrong\u003e18\u003c/strong\u003e, 1735\u0026ndash;1743 (2007)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eE.M. Rivera, M. Araiza, W. Brostow, V.M. Castano, J. Dıaz-Estrada, R. Hern\u0026aacute;ndez et al., Synthesis of hydroxyapatite from eggshells. Mater. Lett. \u003cstrong\u003e41\u003c/strong\u003e, 128\u0026ndash;134 (1999)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eK. Sanosh, M.-C. Chu, A. Balakrishnan, T. Kim, S.-J. Cho, Utilization of biowaste eggshells to synthesize nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite powders. Mater. Lett. \u003cstrong\u003e63\u003c/strong\u003e, 2100\u0026ndash;2102 (2009)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eA. Toibah, F. Misran, A. Shaaban, Z. Mustafa, Effect of pH condition during hydrothermal synthesis on the properties of hydroxyapatite from eggshell waste. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. \u003cstrong\u003e13\u003c/strong\u003e, 4958\u0026ndash;4969 (2019)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eV. Trakoolwannachai, P. Kheolamai, S. Ummartyotin, Development of hydroxyapatite from eggshell waste and a chitosan-based composite: In vitro behavior of human osteoblast-like cell (Saos-2) cultures. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. \u003cstrong\u003e134\u003c/strong\u003e, 557\u0026ndash;564 (2019)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eS.-C. Wu, H.-C. Hsu, S.-K. Hsu, Y.-C. Chang, W.-F. Ho, Effects of heat treatment on the synthesis of hydroxyapatite from eggshell powders. Ceram. Int. \u003cstrong\u003e41\u003c/strong\u003e, 10718\u0026ndash;10724 (2015)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eS.-C. Wu, H.-C. Hsu, S.-K. Hsu, Y.-C. Chang, W.-F. Ho, Synthesis of hydroxyapatite from eggshell powders through ball milling and heat treatment. J. Asian. Ceam. Soc. \u003cstrong\u003e4\u003c/strong\u003e, 85\u0026ndash;90 (2016)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eM. Abdelraof, M.S. Hasanin, H. El -Saied, Ecofriendly green conversion of potato peel wastes to high productivity bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr. Polym. \u003cstrong\u003e211\u003c/strong\u003e, 75\u0026ndash;83 (2019)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eM. Abdelraof, M.S. Hasanin, M.M. Farag, H.Y. Ahmed, Green synthesis of bacterial cellulose/bioactive glass nanocomposites: Effect of glass nanoparticles on cellulose yield, biocompatibility and antimicrobial activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. \u003cstrong\u003e138\u003c/strong\u003e, 975\u0026ndash;985 (2019)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eG.L. Miller, Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar. Anal. Chem. \u003cstrong\u003e31\u003c/strong\u003e, 426\u0026ndash;428 (1959)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eH.Y. Ahmed, N. Safwat, R. Shehata, E.H. Althubaiti, S. Kareem, A. Atef et al., Synthesis of Natural Nano-Hydroxyapatite from Snail Shells and Its Biological Activity: Antimicrobial, Antibiofilm, and Biocompatibility. Membranes \u003cstrong\u003e12\u003c/strong\u003e, 408 (2022)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eS. Mignardi, L. Archilletti, L. Medeghini, C. De Vito, Valorization of Eggshell Biowaste for Sustainable Environmental Remediation. Sci. Rep. \u003cstrong\u003e10\u003c/strong\u003e, 2436 (2020)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eE. Bilgi, E. Bayir, A. Sendemir-Urkmez, E.E. Hames, Optimization of bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus using carob and haricot bean. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. \u003cstrong\u003e90\u003c/strong\u003e, 2\u0026ndash;10 (2016)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJ. Rocha, A. Lemos, S. Kannan, S. Agathopoulos, J. Ferreira, Hydroxyapatite scaffolds hydrothermally grown from aragonitic cuttlefish bones. J. Mater. Chem. \u003cstrong\u003e15\u003c/strong\u003e, 5007\u0026ndash;5011 (2005)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eR. Murugan, S. Ramakrishna, Production of ultra-fine bioresorbable carbonated hydroxyapatite. Acta Biomater. \u003cstrong\u003e2\u003c/strong\u003e, 201\u0026ndash;206 (2006)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eC. Rodrigues, P. Serricella, A. Linhares, R. Guerdes, R. Borojevic, M. Rossi et al., Characterization of a bovine collagen\u0026ndash;hydroxyapatite composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials \u003cstrong\u003e24\u003c/strong\u003e, 4987\u0026ndash;4997 (2003)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eM.M. Farag, M.M. Ahmed, N.M. Abdallah, W. Swieszkowski, A.M. Shehabeldine, The combined antibacterial and anticancer properties of nano Ce-containing Mg-phosphate ceramic. Life Sci. \u003cstrong\u003e257\u003c/strong\u003e, 117999 (2020)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eP. Tamilselvi, A. Yelilarasi, M. Hema, R.J.N.B. Anbarasan, Synthesis of hierarchical structured MgO by sol-gel method. 2013;2:130106\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eS. Ummartyotin, H. Manuspiya, Eggshell waste: An effective source of hydroxyapatite for photocatalyst. Journal of Metals, Materials and Minerals. 2018;28\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eM. Akram, R. Ahmed, I. Shakir, W.A.W. Ibrahim, R. Hussain, Extracting hydroxyapatite and its precursors from natural resources. J. Mater. Sci. \u003cstrong\u003e49\u003c/strong\u003e, 1461\u0026ndash;1475 (2014)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eM.M. Farag, Z.M. Al-Rashidy, M.M. Ahmed, In vitro drug release behavior of Ce-doped nano-bioactive glass carriers under oxidative stress. J. Mater. Science: Mater. Med. \u003cstrong\u003e30\u003c/strong\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;15 (2019)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eT. Numata, Y. Okada, Molecular determinants of sensitivity and conductivity of human TRPM7 to Mg2 + and Ca2+. Channels \u003cstrong\u003e2\u003c/strong\u003e, 283\u0026ndash;286 (2008)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eE.S. Day, L. Osborn, A. Whitty, Effect of divalent cations on the affinity and selectivity of \u0026alpha;4 integrins towards the integrin ligands vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1: Ca 2 + activation of integrin \u0026alpha;4\u0026beta;1 confers a distinct ligand specificity. Cell. communication \u0026amp; adhesion \u003cstrong\u003e9\u003c/strong\u003e, 205\u0026ndash;219 (2002)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eM. Goldberg, P. Krohicheva, A. Fomin, D. Khairutdinova, O. Antonova, A. Baikin et al., In situ magnesium calcium phosphate cements formation: From one pot powders precursors synthesis to in vitro investigations. Bioactive Mater. \u003cstrong\u003e5\u003c/strong\u003e, 644\u0026ndash;658 (2020)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eH.W. Kim, J.C. Knowles, H.E. Kim. Hydroxyapatite and gelatin composite foams processed via novel freeze-drying and crosslinking for use as temporary hard tissue scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. 2005;72:136 \u0026ndash; 45\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eS.V. Dorozhkin, Dental applications of calcium orthophosphates (CaPO4). J. Dent. Res. \u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e, 1007 (2019)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"journal-of-inorganic-and-organometallic-polymers-and-materials","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"joip","sideBox":"Learn more about [Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials](https://www.springer.com/journal/10904)","snPcode":"10904","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/10904/3","title":"Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Bacterial cellulose, Hydroxyapatite, Fermentation, Food industrials waste, Biomaterials","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1670361/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1670361/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis work aimed at the preparation of cost-effective bioactive composites based on bacterial cellulose (BC) and eggshell or hydroxyapatite (HAp) by a green method using bacteria. HAp was prepared from eggshell wastes, and another one was synthesized from chemical precursors for comparison. The BC productivity was evaluated, and the resultant composites were characterized by XRD, FTIR, and SEM/EDX. Furthermore, the biodegradation and bioactivity were assessed in SBF, and the cell viability was studied against oral normal cells. The results showed that the productivity of BC was not affected by HAp at lower concentrations; however, the yield was decreased at higher concentrations. Moreover, the eggshell was converted to Ca\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e(PO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e)\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e in BC/eggshell composite, while HAp in the composites contained either eggshell-derived HAp or chemically-derived HAp was a combination of\u0026nbsp;Ca\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e(PO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e)\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e and HAp phases. The in vitro bioactivity test in SBF showed that all composites were induced the formation of a bone-like apatite layer on their surface. Finally, the in vitro cell viability test was confirmed good biocompatibility against the composites which expectedly are as pure as to be used safely in different biomedical applications.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Green synthesis of bioactive hydroxyapatite/cellulose composites from food industrial wastes","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2022-05-31 15:58:25","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1670361/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2022-05-26T00:47:55+00:00","index":0,"fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2022-05-24T12:42:15+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials","date":"2022-05-18T12:22:13+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"journal-of-inorganic-and-organometallic-polymers-and-materials","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"joip","sideBox":"Learn more about [Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials](https://www.springer.com/journal/10904)","snPcode":"10904","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/10904/3","title":"Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"a7c7850a-c7b7-4e4e-a1b1-3a8dec78c0f8","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 31st, 2022","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2022-08-01T10:50:59+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2022-05-31 15:58:25","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-1670361","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-1670361","identity":"rs-1670361","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"WrCJVZZCHTDjtuVLN7oU0","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}