QGIS plugin or web app? Lessons learned in the development of a 3D georeferencer

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

Collections of historical images are currently being scanned to stop their degradation and to enable a numeric exploitation. These collections have a high cultural, artistic and scientific value. However, they are not fully exploited because the photographs do not have a georeference (geographic information cannot be extracted from the picture) and are poorly labeled (makes searching in a database inefficient). During the last years, we developed a QGIS plugin and a web app dedicated to the georeferencing of photographs and the linking of images with spatial data. In this paper, we discuss the technologies involved and compare both implementations. The results suggest that both approaches are valuable but provide different advantages in term of target users and development effort.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0