The endometrium: is thickness all that counts?
article
OA: bronze
CC0
AI-generated summary
This paper examines the significance of endometrial thickness in reproductive outcomes and reviews current understanding of the endometrium's complex role beyond just its measurement.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
The commonly used 7 mm threshold for endometrial thickness in assisted reproductive technology lacks strong evidence and stems from outdated data. Recent studies show that live birth outcomes are comparable even with linings of less than 7 mm, particularly when using euploid embryos. Measurement variability, confounding factors and differing clinical practices limit the reliability of endometrial thickness as a standalone predictor. While extremely thin linings may warrant further evaluation, rigid cut-off values are unjustified. Endometrial thickness should be integrated into a broader, individualized assessment rather than drive clinical decisions in isolation.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
References (6)
- W2010773834 via openalex
- W2078275269 via openalex
- W4322772171 via openalex
- W4382933480 via openalex
- W4409880034 via openalex
- W4412363314 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK