Directional heritability and the geometry of multivariate constraint

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15

This paper introduces directional heritability and geometric transformations to analyze multivariate constraint, finding that eigenvector alignment, not correlation strength, impacts its distribution, and over two-thirds of empirical populations exhibit low heritability in many phenotypic directions.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15 · read from full text

The paper studies how evolutionary responses to selection depend on the distribution of additive genetic variance across combinations of traits, focusing on directional heritability (the fraction of phenotypic variance that is additive genetic along a specific selection gradient). Using a geometric rescaling of trait space to make phenotypic variance isotropic, the authors derive that directional heritability can be written as a quadratic form of a whitened genetic matrix, and that under uniformly random selection directions the spread of directional heritability is linked to the relative eigenvalue variance of this whitened matrix. Simulations and analyses of 55 empirical genetic–phenotypic matrix pairs from 11 studies show that the alignment of eigenvectors between genetic and phenotypic matrices can drive variation in where low-heritability directions occur, with many populations exhibiting large fractions of directions with low heritability. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Evolutionary responses to selection depend on how additive genetic variance is distributed across trait combinations. We focus on directional heritability—the fraction of phenotypic variance that is additive genetic along a given selection gradient—and treat its distribution across directions as a central object for describing multivariate constraint. Using a geometric transformation that rescales trait space so that phenotypic variance is isotropic, we show that directional heritability becomes a quadratic form in a whitened genetic matrix G ∗ = P −1/2 GP −1/2 . Under uniformly distributed selection directions, the squared coefficient of variation of directional heritability satisfies CV 2 ( h 2 ) = (2/( p + 2)) V rel ( G ∗ ), where V rel ( G ∗ ) is the relative eigenvalue variance of the whitened matrix and p is the number of traits. Simulations show that alignment between the eigenvector systems of G and P has a larger effect on the spread of directional heritability than correlation strength. Analyses of 55 empirical G – P matrix pairs from 11 studies reveal wide variation across biological systems in how often selection encounters low-heritability directions: over two thirds of the populations examined had more than 25% of phenotypic directions with h 2 < 0.25. The eigenvalue spectrum of G ∗ provides a sufficient summary for characterising how matrix geometry shapes evolutionary constraint on the phenotypic scale.
Full text 1,504 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Evolutionary responses to selection depend on how additive genetic variance is distributed across trait combinations. We focus on directional heritability—the fraction of phenotypic variance that is additive genetic along a given selection gradient—and treat its distribution across directions as a central object for describing multivariate constraint. Using a geometric transformation that rescales trait space so that phenotypic variance is isotropic, we show that directional heritability becomes a quadratic form in a whitened genetic matrix G∗ = P−1/2GP−1/2. Under uniformly distributed selection directions, the squared coefficient of variation of directional heritability satisfies CV2(h2) = (2/(p + 2)) Vrel(G∗), where Vrel(G∗) is the relative eigenvalue variance of the whitened matrix and p is the number of traits. Simulations show that alignment between the eigenvector systems of G and P has a larger effect on the spread of directional heritability than correlation strength. Analyses of 55 empirical G–P matrix pairs from 11 studies reveal wide variation across biological systems in how often selection encounters low-heritability directions: over two thirds of the populations examined had more than 25% of phenotypic directions with h2 < 0.25. The eigenvalue spectrum of G∗ provides a sufficient summary for characterising how matrix geometry shapes evolutionary constraint on the phenotypic scale. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0