Regenerative failure of sympathetic axons contributes to deficits in functional recovery after nerve injury

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Renewed scientific interest in sympathetic modulation of muscle and neuromuscular junctions has spurred a flurry of new discoveries with major implications for motor diseases. However, the role sympathetic axons play in the persistent dysfunction that occurs after nerve injuries remains to be explored. Peripheral nerve injuries are common and lead to motor, sensory, and autonomic deficits that result in lifelong disabilities. Given the importance of sympathetic signaling in muscle metabolic health and maintaining bodily homeostasis, it is imperative to understand the regenerative capacity of sympathetic axons after injury. Therefore, we tested sympathetic axon regeneration and functional reinnervation of skin and muscle, both acute and long-term, using a battery of anatomical, pharmacological, chemogenetic, cell culture, analytical chemistry, and electrophysiological techniques. We employed several established growth-enhancing interventions, including electrical stimulation and conditioning lesion, as well as an innovative tool called bioluminescent optogenetics. Our results indicate that sympathetic regeneration is not enhanced by any of these treatments and may even be detrimental to sympathetic regeneration. Despite the complete return of motor reinnervation after sciatic nerve injury, gastrocnemius muscle atrophy and deficits in muscle cellular energy charge, as measured by relative ATP, ADP, and AMP concentrations, persisted long after injury, even with electrical stimulation. We suggest that these long-term deficits in muscle energy charge and atrophy are related to the deficiency in sympathetic axon regeneration. New studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying sympathetic regeneration to develop therapeutics that can enhance the regeneration of all axon types.
Full text 2,006 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Abstract Renewed scientific interest in sympathetic modulation of muscle and neuromuscular junctions has spurred a flurry of new discoveries with major implications for motor diseases. However, the role sympathetic axons play in the persistent dysfunction that occurs after nerve injuries remains to be explored. Peripheral nerve injuries are common and lead to motor, sensory, and autonomic deficits that result in lifelong disabilities. Given the importance of sympathetic signaling in muscle metabolic health and maintaining bodily homeostasis, it is imperative to understand the regenerative capacity of sympathetic axons after injury. Therefore, we tested sympathetic axon regeneration and functional reinnervation of skin and muscle, both acute and long-term, using a battery of anatomical, pharmacological, chemogenetic, cell culture, analytical chemistry, and electrophysiological techniques. We employed several established growth-enhancing interventions, including electrical stimulation and conditioning lesion, as well as an innovative tool called bioluminescent optogenetics. Our results indicate that sympathetic regeneration is not enhanced by any of these treatments and may even be detrimental to sympathetic regeneration. Despite the complete return of motor reinnervation after sciatic nerve injury, gastrocnemius muscle atrophy and deficits in muscle cellular energy charge, as measured by relative ATP, ADP, and AMP concentrations, persisted long after injury, even with electrical stimulation. We suggest that these long-term deficits in muscle energy charge and atrophy are related to the deficiency in sympathetic axon regeneration. New studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying sympathetic regeneration to develop therapeutics that can enhance the regeneration of all axon types. Full Text Availability The license terms selected by the author(s) for this preprint version do not permit archiving in PMC. The full text is available from the preprint server.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-10T06:41:27.906138+00:00