Grade Expectations: Generative AI Use Does Not (Yet) Alter Student Achievement

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16

This study found that declared generative AI use in student projects was not associated with higher or lower grades, with overall performance and writing complexity being stronger predictors.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16 · read from full text

The study analyzed 4,489 student projects submitted between 2022 and 2025 to examine how self-reported generative AI use relates to linguistic features of student writing and academic achievement, using mixed-effects regression models and an institutional dataset. Declared AI use was not systematically associated with higher or lower project grades after controlling for contextual factors, while overall performance, attempt number, linguistic complexity, and submission length were robust predictors. The paper is presented as a preprint and has not been peer reviewed, which the authors explicitly note. Relevance to endometriosis: this paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract The rapid diffusion of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has reshaped academic practices, yet its implications for transparency, authorship, and academic performance remain insufficiently understood. This study analyzes 4,489 student projects submitted between 2022 and 2025 to investigate the relationship between self-reported AI use, linguistic characteristics of student writing, and academic achievement. Using mixed-effects regression models and a comprehensive institutional dataset, we assess to what extent declared AI use, overall academic achievement, demographic variables, and text readability metrics predict project grades. The findings show that declared AI use is not systematically associated with higher or lower marks once contextual factors are controlled for, while overall performance, attempt number, linguistic complexity, and submission length emerge as robust predictors. The results highlight the importance of nuanced, evidence-based institutional policies that balance ethical AI integration with the safeguarding of academic integrity. By offering a large-scale empirical examination of declared AI usage in authentic coursework, this study contributes critical insights for universities navigating the pedagogical and regulatory challenges of AI-supported learning.
Full text 11,869 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Grade Expectations: Generative AI Use Does Not (Yet) Alter Student Achievement | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Grade Expectations: Generative AI Use Does Not (Yet) Alter Student Achievement Mareike Mueller, René Arnold, Stefan Wagenpfeil This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9053629/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 5 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The rapid diffusion of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has reshaped academic practices, yet its implications for transparency, authorship, and academic performance remain insufficiently understood. This study analyzes 4,489 student projects submitted between 2022 and 2025 to investigate the relationship between self-reported AI use, linguistic characteristics of student writing, and academic achievement. Using mixed-effects regression models and a comprehensive institutional dataset, we assess to what extent declared AI use, overall academic achievement, demographic variables, and text readability metrics predict project grades. The findings show that declared AI use is not systematically associated with higher or lower marks once contextual factors are controlled for, while overall performance, attempt number, linguistic complexity, and submission length emerge as robust predictors. The results highlight the importance of nuanced, evidence-based institutional policies that balance ethical AI integration with the safeguarding of academic integrity. By offering a large-scale empirical examination of declared AI usage in authentic coursework, this study contributes critical insights for universities navigating the pedagogical and regulatory challenges of AI-supported learning. Generative Artificial Intelligence Higher Education Student Achievement Observational Data Multilevel Modeling Academic Performance AI Governance Readability Metrics Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Reviewers agreed at journal 11 May, 2026 Reviewers invited by journal 20 Apr, 2026 Editor assigned by journal 16 Apr, 2026 Submission checks completed at journal 22 Mar, 2026 First submitted to journal 19 Mar, 2026 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9053629","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":626620502,"identity":"693a462b-0d58-414e-bd4c-dce9f51b1b5d","order_by":0,"name":"Mareike Mueller","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Hochschule Macromedia","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mareike","middleName":"","lastName":"Mueller","suffix":""},{"id":626620507,"identity":"74acb127-8f7e-4a37-a97a-57e9c20362f4","order_by":1,"name":"René Arnold","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Hochschule Macromedia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"René","middleName":"","lastName":"Arnold","suffix":""},{"id":626620511,"identity":"4851c8ae-fc21-4163-99c5-039bf9f95c0d","order_by":2,"name":"Stefan Wagenpfeil","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"PFH Private University of Applied Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Stefan","middleName":"","lastName":"Wagenpfeil","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-03-06 20:08:32","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9053629/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9053629/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":107422957,"identity":"ea64728f-bd65-4cd6-888c-9dea55201c5d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-21 10:50:54","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":425863,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"GenerativeAIUseDoesNotYetAlterStudentAchievementV2.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9053629/v1_covered_499cef2f-8d92-4574-b3a7-20824cbe5d60.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Grade Expectations: Generative AI Use Does Not (Yet) Alter Student Achievement","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"international-journal-for-educational-integrity","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"ijei","sideBox":"Learn more about [International Journal for Educational Integrity](https://edintegrity.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"40979","submissionUrl":"https://submission.springernature.com/new-submission/40979/3","title":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Generative Artificial Intelligence, Higher Education, Student Achievement, Observational Data, Multilevel Modeling, Academic Performance, AI Governance, Readability Metrics","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9053629/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9053629/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThe rapid diffusion of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has reshaped academic practices, yet its implications for transparency, authorship, and academic performance remain insufficiently understood. This study analyzes 4,489 student projects submitted between 2022 and 2025 to investigate the relationship between self-reported AI use, linguistic characteristics of student writing, and academic achievement. Using mixed-effects regression models and a comprehensive institutional dataset, we assess to what extent declared AI use, overall academic achievement, demographic variables, and text readability metrics predict project grades. The findings show that declared AI use is not systematically associated with higher or lower marks once contextual factors are controlled for, while overall performance, attempt number, linguistic complexity, and submission length emerge as robust predictors. The results highlight the importance of nuanced, evidence-based institutional policies that balance ethical AI integration with the safeguarding of academic integrity. By offering a large-scale empirical examination of declared AI usage in authentic coursework, this study contributes critical insights for universities navigating the pedagogical and regulatory challenges of AI-supported learning.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Grade Expectations: Generative AI Use Does Not (Yet) Alter Student Achievement","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-04-21 10:50:36","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9053629/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"16344565462742500112860118518625544679","date":"2026-05-11T14:19:47+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2026-04-20T23:31:08+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2026-04-16T23:27:24+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2026-03-23T02:45:43+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","date":"2026-03-19T11:28:37+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"international-journal-for-educational-integrity","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"ijei","sideBox":"Learn more about [International Journal for Educational Integrity](https://edintegrity.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"40979","submissionUrl":"https://submission.springernature.com/new-submission/40979/3","title":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"18fd63af-efeb-40a0-b72d-b70baa2f6a1e","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 21st, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"16344565462742500112860118518625544679","date":"2026-05-11T14:19:47+00:00","index":27,"fulltext":""}],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-21T10:50:36+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-04-21 10:50:36","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9053629","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9053629","identity":"rs-9053629","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0