Best BLAST hit alone cannot be used as evidence of fraud

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

In a recent study, Blanco-Fernandez, et al. 1 applied molecular tools to authenticate fish products and conclude evidence of “worrying international fraud”. They revealed mislabeling in recognizable and unrecognizable fish products labeled as anchovy, hake and tuna commercialized by European companies. Their analyses consisted on extracting DNA from the fish product to be authenticated followed by amplification and sequencing of a suite of DNA markers and on comparing the resulting sequences to the GenBank sequence database using BLAST (Basic Tool Alignment Search Tool) ( https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi ). By carefully reanalyzing their data, we identify errors in their species identification and conclude that best BLAST hit alone cannot be used as evidence of fraud.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0