Increased vaginal bleeding: the reasons women give for consulting primary care
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
Abstract
A previous study identified interference with life as the main reason for consultation with increased vaginal bleeding. The purpose of this study was to determine the reasons why the heaviness of periods interferes with life and how this may be related to consultation. The design was a case-control study in which questionnaires were sent to women who consulted primary care with new episodes of increased vaginal bleeding and two groups of controls: consulting controls with another illness and non-consulting community controls. Of the 186 women who reported that heaviness of periods interfered with life the most common reason given was 'mood' (87%). There was no difference in the reporting of 'mood' interfering with life or general health questionnaire score between cases, consulting controls and non-consulting controls. Women who report heavy periods interfering with life complain most commonly of mood as one of the reasons. This does not distinguish consulters and non-consulters and is not reflected in objective measures of psychological distress. Clinicians should focus initially on treating the presenting physical symptoms.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
Cited by (2)
- Health-related quality of life and economic burden of abnormal uterine bleeding 2009
- A randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in primary care against standard treatment for menorrhagia: the ECLIPSE trial 2015
References (8)
- Why women consult with increased vaginal bleeding: a case-control study. via openalex
- W1577524338 via openalex
- W1976021192 via openalex
- W1977275196 via openalex
- W183395229 via openalex
- W2012165536 via openalex
- W2088534870 via openalex
- W1978711334 via openalex
Cited by (2)
- A randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in primary care against standard treatment for menorrhagia: the ECLIPSE trial 2015
- Health-related quality of life and economic burden of abnormal uterine bleeding 2009
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-15T06:18:04.506796+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK