Enhancing Supply Chain Management Risk Mitigation: A House of Risk Methodology Applied to Brick Manufacturing in Aceh Besar Regency

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

This paper applies the House of Risk (HOR) methodology to identify and prioritize supply chain risk factors in brick manufacturing in Aceh Besar Regency, using a risk assessment approach rather than biomedical experimentation. It focuses on mapping possible risk events and selecting mitigation actions based on their relative priority within the HOR framework. The main finding is the structured identification and ranking of supply chain risks and the associated mitigation actions to reduce those risks in the studied manufacturing context. The paper does not state biomedical outcomes or include patient populations. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Effective supply chain management is imperative for the seamless operation of manufacturing facilities, ensuring the timely delivery of goods and services to customers. However, the inherent complexity of supply chain systems introduces various risks and uncertainties that can significantly impact factory performance and the broader business sector. This research addresses the challenges faced by a brick manufacturing factory in Aceh Besar Regency, highlighting the absence of a well-structured risk management framework, inadequate mitigation planning, and suboptimal risk identification methods within the supply chain. To address these shortcomings, this study employs the House of Risk (HoR) methodology, utilizing it to identify risk events and agents within the supply chain. Mitigation strategies are designed based on the Aggregate Risk Potential (ARP). Data for the study were gathered through interviews and questionnaires completed by 12 respondents from three brick manufacturing factories and consumers. A combined quantitative and qualitative analysis approach, incorporating severity and occurrence risk levels assessed by each respondent, was used. The application of the Supply Chain Operation Reference (SCOR) model revealed 21 risk events and 23 risk agents. Notably, risk agents such as adverse weather conditions, weak contractual agreements with suppliers, adverse weather during production and delivery processes, and damaged products displayed the highest ARP values (649, 826, 1521, 473, 276) across key business processes (plan, source, make, deliver, return). In response to these findings, proposed mitigation strategies include executing tasks during inclement weather, managing raw material inventory, establishing fair long-term contractual agreements with suppliers, selecting appropriate transportation during adverse weather, and choosing high-quality suppliers. This research contributes to the field of supply chain management by addressing gaps in risk mitigation within the brick manufacturing sector. The combination of the HoR methodology and ARP provides a comprehensive framework for identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks, thereby enhancing the resilience of the supply chain. The results are particularly relevant for practitioners seeking effective strategies to manage risks in brick manufacturing and other similar industries.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0