Perceptions of Community Nursing: A Comparative View Between Students and Professionals Through a Mixed-Methods Study

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

This study found that nursing students have significantly lower perceptions of community nursing compared to practicing professionals, with divergences in knowledge, practices, and placement preferences evident in both quantitative and qualitative data.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: /Objectives: Background/Objectives: Community nursing is central to equitable, preventive care, yet its role is often underexposed in undergraduate training. We compared perceptions of community nursing between first-year nursing students and practicing community nurses, identifying convergence/divergence to inform education and workforce strategies. Methods: Explanatory sequential mixed-methods study in Spain. Phase I: cross-sectional online survey with sociodemographics, ad-hoc items, and the Scale on COmmunity care PErceptions (SCOPE). Phase II: Photovoice groups (two student groups, one professional group). Quantitative data used medians (IQR)/proportions with χ² and Mann–Whitney U (α=0.05). Qualitative data underwent participatory thematic analysis; integration used joint displays and follow-the-thread. Results: Sixty-seven participants (students n=48; professionals n=19). Students scored lower than professionals in SCOPE affective perception (6.2 [5.4–7.1] vs 8.3 [7.4–8.9]), perception of practices (5.4 [4.8–6.3] vs 7.8 [6.7–8.5]), and placement preferences (4.1 [3.5–5.0] vs 6.1 [5.3–7.2]) (all p<0.001). Knowledge and orientation also differed: asset-mapping knowledge (27.1% students vs 84.2% professionals; p<0.001), preference for hospital placements (89.6% vs 5.3%; p<0.001), and interest in community specialization (22.9% vs 57.9%; p=0.01). Photovoice generated seven categories (e.g., “More than techniques,” “The invisible nurse,” “Technology with a human face,” “Learning by doing,” “Care in teams”) that explained students’ uncertainty and professionals’ multifaceted, community-embedded role. Integration showed convergence on hospital preference and low institutional visibility, and divergence between high stated importance and superficial student knowledge. Conclusions: A marked perception gap separates students from community nurses. Earlier, mentored community exposures and participatory pedagogies, alongside institutional strategies to increase the visibility of community nursing, may narrow this gap.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0