Immunogenicity and Safety of the Booster BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis Treated with Biological Disease-Modifying Drugs

preprint OA: closed
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

Background: Vaccination confers relatively short-term protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), indicating the need for booster doses. Immunocompromised individuals, including those with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), may have pronounced immune response waning. Vaccine-boosted humoral and T-cell responses minimize poor coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) outcome without increasing adverse events (AE). There is limited evidence of third-dose vaccination in axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) patients. We investigated immune-response persistence after primary vaccination and immunogenicity and safety after the BNT162b2 booster vaccination.Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled an AxSpA cohort treated with interleukin-17 (IL-17) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) inhibitors. Serum SARS-CoV-2-specific and virus-neutralizing antibodies for humoral response and flow cytometric detection of intracellular cytokines following SARS-CoV-2-specific peptide-based stimulation for T-cell immune responses were assessed, and safety was evaluated via a clinical questionnaire.Findings: Fifteen male AxSpA patients treated with TNFα (73·3%) or IL-17 (26·7%) inhibitors were enrolled and had humoral response persistence at 6 months: 905·6 (±186·1 SD) and 409·1 (±335·7) U/mL. Specific antibody concentrations further increased after booster vaccination to 989·7 (±12·62) and 1000 U/mL and T-cell responders from 53·3% to 80%, with no differences between AxSpA (including “vaccination only” and “hybrid immunity” subgroups) and healthy control (HC) cohorts. No severe AE occurred; the AE spectrum was comparable to that of the general population.Interpretation: Immune-response persistence after primary vaccination and immunogenicity after booster vaccination were unaffected by anti-IL17 or anti-TNFα therapy with similar AE as in the general population. Funding: Rudolf Horvath received funding from the Czech Health Research Council (AZV project no. NU20-05-00320); Tomas Milota from Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (grant no. TJ04000443) and the Czech Health Research Council (AZV project no. NU22-05-00402); and Jitka Smetanova from the Grant Schemes at Charles University (reg. no. CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/19_073/0016935).Declaration of Interest: Jitka Smetanova, Tomas Milota, Michal Rataj, Hana Zelena, Jana Hurnakova, and Rudolf Horvath declare that they have no conflict of interests.Ethical Approval: The study was conducted from March to November 2021 in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Motol University HospitalEthics Committee (EK-1729/20; issued on January 06, 2021).

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-21T06:50:27.635823+00:00